Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Párvusz
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 13:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Párvusz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find any evidence that this artist passes WP:N; one small gallery exhibition and a cartoon character in a magazine that has a whole two issues does not inherent notability make - and does not make general notability unless there's reliable sourcing to back it up. Ironholds (talk) 10:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -fails WP:CREATIVE. ukexpat (talk) 13:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence of notability. Vanity page. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Should we let the other 20 Wikipedias that have machine translated clones of this article know about this crap? Sven Manguard Wha? 15:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It was deleted from fi-wiki a year ago as cross-wiki spamming. Reasons were: References only self submitted profiles, comics are published in magazines nurturing a very small language (Sami, Retoroman), which do publish e.g. stories by children, whatever available in that rare language. Seven works displayed once in a norwegian small town gift and souvenir shop [1]. No real exhibitions, articles, collections, studies in art etc. Has asked users in various wikis to translate the article after making a few himself in small rare languages: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], -BluePuddle (talk) 18:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.