Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Kung Fu Hustle characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 22:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Kung Fu Hustle characters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article do not signifies the characters' notability. So split article is not needed for the characters. The article maybe merged into Kung Fu_Hustle#Cast. SABRINA ELEXA (talk) 10:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)— [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A list of characters from a singular piece of fiction is excessive and basically trying to avoid WP:NOTPLOT. We allow brief comments on characters in a cast list, like 2-3 lines, if introducing the characters in more detail seems reasonable, but that's it without significant secondary sources . --MASEM (t) 14:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk note: This AFD was created by a now-blocked sockpuppet, but because User:Masem concurred with the deletion request, I'm not closing the AFD as created in bad-faith. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 22:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Well, since we're here, I'll agree that it should be deleted. Good film, but there's really no cause for a character list to be created. The main article is good enough. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.