Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Zhuo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Comments suggest that nomination was either frivolous or bad faith. Closing under WP:CSK criterion 3. Kinu ^t/_c 05:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Zhuo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no independent news for her, very clearly fails Notability and GNG. Niligirinorbert (talk) 18:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Multiple in-depth RS including some already cited in article. I am surprised a "Before" search missed, for example, this profile of Zhuo in the Harvard Business Review. On the other hand, considering that nominator's only three edits to Wikipedia have been devoted to AfD-ing Zhuo's bio, perhaps nominator is too inexperienced to be know how Wikipedia works. HouseOfChange (talk) 20:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per WP:CSK criteria 2–3 and HouseOfChange. Sources in article establish notability. This is an extremely fishy nomination. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Utterly groundless. Spite nomination after a promotional page created by the nom was deleted. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 20:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - Not sure that OP looked hard enough (if at all). —{Cryptic Canadian} 21:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk ) 21:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 21:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 21:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 21:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 21:46, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious, strong keep - Profiles in Harvard Bus Review and Fortune? Why are we having this discussion? LadyofShalott 01:25, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep as others have said. On a side note, odd to me the nominators first (and only?) ever edits are to create an AfD. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Why was this nominated? by a jealous ex lover? :-) Deathlibrarian (talk) 13:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.