Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Zhiping

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 00:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chen Zhiping (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. The two Forbes articles are Forbes contributors, which per RSP is not RS. Bloomberg Profiles is not RS per RSP. That leaves one source, which arguably isn't significant coverage anyway. Fails WP:GNG. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete Are me and the nom seeing different Forbes articles? They are marked as Forbes Staff which RSP marks as reliable. Though that doesn't have SIGCOV of the actual guy so it doesn't really matter. Looking at Chinese sources the best one I could find was this one. Not enough to meet GNG. Jumpytoo Talk 00:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.