User:ZfJames/sandbox/templates
page name! Edits Reverted (September 2024)
[edit]
Edits Reverted Hullo, and thank you for your efforts to help Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I [diff! reverted one or more] of your recent edits to the page name! page since haha!. hello, what's for dinner? As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! 19:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
User:ZfJames 09 2024
[edit]
Hullo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I reverted one or more of your recent edits to the User:ZfJames page since this is a test of my template. BLAH BLAH BLAH! As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thank you for editing! —zfJames Please add {{ping|ZfJames}} to your reply (talk page, contribs) 15:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
page name! Edits Reverted (September 2024)
[edit] Edits Reverted Hullo, and thank you for your efforts to help Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I [diff! reverted one or more] of your recent edits to the page name! page since haha!. hello, what's for dinner? As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! 19:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
page name! Edits Reverted (September 2024)
[edit] Edits Reverted Hullo, and thank you for your efforts to help Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I [diff! reverted one or more] of your recent edits to the page name! page since haha!. hello, what's for dinner? As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! —zfJames Please add {{ping|ZfJames}} to your reply (talk page, contribs) 19:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 91.90.180.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- 91.90.180.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- 91.90.180.22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 2A02:C7C:8927:6100:A851:DD53:FD88:21ED (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently only vandalising pages - Also: 2A02:C7C:8927:6100:F58E:4308:467A:73BB, 2A02:C7C:8927:6100:3403:F009:2FB1:E132, 2A02:C7C:8927:6100:34A1:2C45:A967:4640 persistently making similar edits to the same page Captainllama (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Regionalrelations (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Obvious block-evading sock of Informationsort. Skitash (talk) 18:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. Bbb23 (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Farshwal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) WP:NOTHERE. All they do is alter or remove sourced info. Never written an edit summary (except once, which was a disruptive edit where they added their own username [1]), let alone used a talk page. Their own talk page is already full of warnings. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- 77.34.160.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – LTA MAB. Knitsey (talk) 20:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 3 |
| Empty articles | 1 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 4 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 16 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 6 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 3 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 15 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- LizlFC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Dookiebooty11 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Profagama (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "fag" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- InTheFamily3 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Zalika Consulting Africa (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Dirty Kong (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "dirty" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- SpaceMouseIndustries (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- WrittenInPublic (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- ExitDos2040 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: (ltd|pty). Violating string: exltdos2040" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 23:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Undisputed Ruined King (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "ruin" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:30, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- FactAttackMe (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Reellifestudios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- BarSeed (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Regionalrelations (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Homogenics (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "homo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file Homo is Latin for "man" and Greek for "same". Please keep this in mind when evaluating a name. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Upgrade to extended-confirmed indefinitely: Related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, and to the recent 2024 Lebanon pager explosions. ѕιη¢єяєℓу ƒяσм, ᗰOᗪ ᑕᖇEᗩTOᖇ 🏡 🗨 📝 22:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP users repeatedly make changes and insert brand names and related content for those brands. Contrary to WP:MEDMOS. Also WP:COI, WP:NPOV. Whywhenwhohow (talk) 23:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of logo that is nearly identical to current logo by several IPs, including two blocked as LTAs, without consensus. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:RUSUKR due to his past work as recruiter. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by Anonymous IP Address. Gunther : Talk 00:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Non-EC users participating in EC-only discussions. Would suggest one month as that probably will be enough time for this to get out of the spotlight, can always be extended later. Awesome Aasim 02:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Frost 09:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article seems to be a recurring problem and there is good evidence of sock-puppetry being used to revert edits. Aszx5000 (talk) 11:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Banner talk 13:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Still, the election is going on and some people are trying to change the president. PLEASE PROTECT THIS. IDB.S (talk) 13:21, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent IP-disruption:[2][3]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Attacks on religious sites during the Israeli invasion of Gaza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion by User:Brettandelle. Binksternet (talk) 15:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Protection requested atleast until December 2024 to avoid unsourced additions by both IPs and new users. Eviction status keeps on getting updated based on speculations without any sources despite advicing not to do so. Even before premiere the speculations are being updates. The article was semi-protected twice in the span of 21 days. Thewikizoomer (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also edit warring on the eviction issue by IPs too is observed. Thewikizoomer (talk) 15:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: It's Sunday, it's a referee, what else can I say. Unknown Temptation (talk) 16:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term sockpuppetry by autoconfirmed accounts and IPs of WP:GENSEX POV-pusher Raxythecat since July 2023.
Here is a list of socks:
- How I could just edit a wiki article (edited from July to August 2023; confirmed sock, same pattern of using "fixing"/"fixed" on edit summaries while removing content and editing on mobile devices)
- 2804:431:F73C:AD80:3591:2D22:DADB:C459 (August 2023; started editing the article shortly after the account above was blocked for socking, same pattern of editing on mobile devices, same interest in mythology/occult religions articles as other socks of raxy)
- 2600:6C4A:717F:B637:348B:313C:B838:E42E (Jan 2024; same pattern of using "fixing"/"fixed" on edit summaries while removing content and editing on mobile)
- 107.77.209.82 (Jan 2024; same pattern of using "fixing"/"fixed" on edit summaries and editing on mobile, same range as multiple IPs listed at this spi section)
- Big Money Threepwood (Feb 2024; confirmed sock, same pattern of removing content from the article)
Raxy has a high degree of interest in this particular area of GENSEX and has been using autoconfirmed accounts to POV-push in this area for a long time, as seen at A person from nowhere, How I could just edit a wiki article and Underwoods Witch. He is an experienced sockpuppeteer and, judging by his reappearances in this article for the span of at least 8 months, he seems to have this page on his "watchlist", so a temporary semi-protection would be of no effect here in practice. Badbluebus (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated IP block evasions and repeated reverting. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Susbush (talk) 18:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by sockpuppet accounts. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Prevention of edit war. Cundebuff (talk) 19:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined, if you get reverted by multiple users you should go to the talk page and discuss. Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined. (edit conflict) You're edit warring against several users and therefore you would like the article protected? Yeah, no. Bishonen | tålk 20:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing barrage from many IPs "requests" from the LTA who has been harassing Magnolia677. Zinnober9 (talk) 20:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please protect for a day. Multiple Block Evasion by MAB IPs. Untamed1910 (talk) 20:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of content promoting a YouTube channel AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Unprotection: The company now likely meet WP:GNG due to new developments since 2015. A number of reliable sources now cover the studio: [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. A redirect to Koch Media or Embracer Group, or the creation of a new article is now likely. I am requesting this again because the closing admin last time declined the request as he confused this company with Draft:Vertigo Gaming, which is not the same company. OceanHok (talk) 05:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Declined for now. Given the lengthy deletion history on this, I'd like to see a draft first. Your first source has no byline and looks like a press release. The second one has a byline but reads like it was taken from a press release. The third one (Reuters) is OK but not really about the company, more about an acquisition, and wouldn't be significant coverage. The other sources look fine. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]
| 21 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC) |
| 13 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Hansmuller (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
A good editor and content creator, they have created a total of 133 articles. One was deleted via G14 in 2022, and another was deleted via A3 back in 2014. Since then, they have created many BLPs and other topic articles, none of which have been deleted. I think they are good to go. GrabUp - Talk 16:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done. I think it's been some ten years User:Hansmuller, since we interacted on nl:Lise Meitner. It's nice to see you here. I see you've been blocked indefinitely in the Dutch Wikipedia for various conflicts in Wikipedia space unrelated to article content, but this did not impact my decision.- I've checked ~10 creations and have noted & tagged one major issue (an uncited short para in a BLP), and a few minor ones (formatting, which I've corrected). You tend to WP:OVERCITE (having 4-5 citations after a paragraph, for instance in Sol de Carvalho), which makes it more difficult to connect sources to specific content. It might be better to put additional citations in a Further reading section if there is unused information in them. I'm also a bit concerned with the Car speed and energy consumption AfD, which resulted in a redirect. Created end of December, it shows essay and textbook tendencies which I don't expect in articles from autopatrolled editors.
- Overall, feel free to nominate yourself when you've created another 8-12 clean articles, as we're not far from the threshold. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 14:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- GnocchiFan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including 
seven Good Articles. They make extensive use of WMF Library to improve sourcing and prose. I believe they are both an excellent editor and also communicator, evident at sensitive article topics at 1984 anti-Sikh riots and Gender and sexual minorities in the Ottoman Empire. In short, let's reduce NPP backlog by giving them auto-patrolled status. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also worth mentioning GnocchiFan created 84 non redirect articles. One article was deleted Sophie Ottaway 8-months ago. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- UndercoverClassicist (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
has created 36 articles, of which over 60 percent (!) are B-class or higher. This was requested and (rightfully) turned down last year, but they have created many more articles and there's no need to patrol. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 05:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Suslindisambiguator (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to introduce another editor with a strong history of editing and article creation. They have created 2,114 articles, including 2 GAs. Their creations include BLPs, which are essential for obtaining the AP flag. Only one of their articles was deleted in 2023 via AfD, and others are G6. Since then, no articles have been deleted. I believe it would be beneficial to grant them this right to help reduce the NPP backlog. GrabUp - Talk 13:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- I found out after nominating that they had previously been granted AP by MusikAnimal, but it was later revoked in 2022 by Primefac due to copyright violations. I am not withdrawing the nomination, as it was two years ago, and the issue may have been resolved, so let’s see if they can be trusted now. GrabUp - Talk 13:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]
- 98Tigerius (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reapplying to have this user rights as I was denied by admin Elli on my first one because of my edit warring block. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for page mover declined in the past 90 days ([12]). — MusikBot talk 17:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- GhostInTheMachine (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I occasionally rename new articles to fix poor titles. I also sometimes want to move new articles to draftspace. Generally, neither case needs a redirect for the old title. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 11:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- RodRabelo7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I'm requesting the page mover permission to help deal with the backlog on Wikipedia:Requested moves, particularly the technical moves but also the requested moves with clear consensus. I have been participating in such discussions with some frequency for a while now, also suggesting the move of some pages myself (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc., all of them moved), and I believe my participation with this permission would be beneficial to the project, especially regarding the backlog, as previously mentioned. Sometimes I try to close obvious consensus, but without being a page mover, I cannot do so and have to rely on a page mover (e.g., 1, 2, 3). I have read the policy and, for what it's worth, I always adopt the maxim "if I am not sure, I won't do it" in my edits. Thank you, RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC) RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- KylieTastic (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, as part of working at AfC I come across submissions on editors main userpage or sandbox that need to be cleanly moved to draft (i.e. without leaving a redirect). I stopped moving such submissions years ago as if the editor starts another article I was then the creator rather the actual creator which never seemed right to me. It would also be useful for when new editors create/move drafts to the Wikipedia or Template namespaces either in error or attempting to promote/spam. KylieTastic (talk) 12:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Tvfunhouse (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have reviewed the criteria for receiving this permission, and feel my contribution history demonstrates an adequate knowledge of creating, expanding, and patrolling articles in accordance to Wikipedia policies. Tvfunhouse (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- Aliy Dawut (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- HypeBoy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([13]). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Mischellemougly (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have 16 months experience in editing Wikipedia. I wish to contribute whole lot of my time for betterment of Wikipedia and reduce the backlog in all possible ways that I can. As an initial step towards it, I am applying for granting this user right, so I can use it to improve pages in Wikipedia. Thank You! Mischellemougly (talk) 09:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done: user blocked. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Rofraja (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been reviewing and fixing bare URLs for the past year and I would like to try something different. I'd like to get reviewer rights to be able to start reviewing from a different angle. Rofraja (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cremastra (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm an experienced user, and would like to help out at pending changes. I know the backlog is small, but I see no reason why I can't spend a bit of time to make it smaller. I have experience in anti-vandalism, and already some *limited* experience reviewing changes at Wikibooks, where I hold the reviewer right (although I am not super active there). Cremastra (talk) 16:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- DM5Pedia (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- LR.127 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
While I haven't been editing for very long (only a few months), I have rollback rights and frequently revert vandalism. I also review Redirects for Creation, which is under pending changes protection. I've read the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. LR.127 (talk) 17:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Cysquatch (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now and frequently revert vandalism. However, I often come across constructive edits that I can't do much about. For this reason, I would like to have the pending changes reviewer tool to mark these edits as reviewed and broadly acceptable for public view , allowing me to take on new tasks. Cysquatch (talk) 18:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Bunnypranav (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like access to rollback for more efficiently combating vandalism. I have gained experience in patrolling RecentChanges. I also make sure to always warn (and welcome new users) after reverting their edits on their talk page. I declare that I have read through all the policies regarding vandalism. Bunnypranav (talk) 11:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I noticed you started actively reverting vandalism a few days ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend more time gaining experience fighting vandalism before assigning you advanced permissions. Keep up the good work, and consider reapplying in a month. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). Thanks, Fastily 07:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the positive advice. In all of my reverts till now I have always left a warning without fail. Bunnypranav (talk) 07:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- Matrix (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have made quite a few edit requests in the Template talk namespace, as well as edits directly in the template namespace. I always test my changes in the sandbox before making edits directly. I am also a Commons admin and have made lots of technical changes in templates there as well. I am currently focussing on turning templates to be dark mode compatible, and many templates and editnotices are template protected. Therefore I request template editor so it can be more easy to implement dark mode compatibility into templates. Thank you, —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 13:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
(guideline: >1 year, applicant: 2)- (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~4600)
- (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 174)
- (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
- (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: >3)
- (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: >5)
- Primefac (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Matrix, do you see this as a relatively short-term, get-all-dark-mode-sorted type of situation, or do you see yourself needing this for other applications? (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, more of the former. I would be happy with having this right for 3 months or so. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 17:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- To be honest, more of the former. I would be happy with having this right for 3 months or so. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
- Matrix, do you see this as a relatively short-term, get-all-dark-mode-sorted type of situation, or do you see yourself needing this for other applications? (please do not ping on reply) Primefac (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
- Done for the rest of the year. Primefac (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
end ----------------------------------
 | Moderate level of vandalism. [view • purge] 4.07 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 14:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC) change |
| Immediate requests | Entries |
|---|---|
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 107 |
| Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests | 66 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 19 |
| Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests | 85 |
| Copyright violations for speedy deletion | 0 |
Current discussions and requests
|
|---|
Vandalism reports
|
|---|
Enhanced editing toolbar: Bold text, Italic text, Example image, Heading text, Bulleted list item, Numbered list item, Indented line, Non-formatted text, Big text, Small text, Superscript text, Subscript text, Redirect, Table. MediaWiki toolbar: Link title, External link, Example sound, Formula, Strike-through text, Table, Footnote.
Reports[edit]
User-reported[edit]
|
Speedy and proposed deletions
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Speedy and proposed deletions[edit]
|
New pages
|
|---|
22 September 2024
|
Backlogs
|
|---|
|
Administrative backlog
Wikipedia backlog
Pages missing references list
|