User talk:Attaboy

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

SPI

Your report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mw0001 was exceptionally thorough and clear. Thanks. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

WP:AN3

Hi. At the edit-warring noticeboard, you stated that I had broken the three revert rule on Brad Marchand. The 3RR states that users may not have MORE than 3 reverts on the same page in 24 hours. Given that I have only ever edited the page in question 3 times, and have therefore not broken the 3RR, I'd appreciate it if you would retract your comment at the noticeboard. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 04:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

My apologies. On my way. Higgyrun3 (talk) 04:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Much appreciated. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 04:47, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Brobb1

First, a good morning to you; concerning your last message on the users talk-page I disagree: he is indeed allowed to blank his talk-page ("Simply deleting others' comments on your talk page is permitted, but most editors prefer archiving....... removal of a comment is taken as proof that the user has read it."). So, I would have left his blanking alone. Just saying. He is plastering me with email half of the time, btw. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out to me. I guess I was being overzealous. I went back and undid my changes Attaboy (talk) 07:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, and no problem, of course. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Hi, I'm LuisCerni who wrote about Wernicke and it seems that you did not like. This disease is terrible and affects 2% of humanity. Oddly enough, is poorly studied and is convenient an updated Wikipedia page. Long ago I did with that page in Wikipedia in Spanish. Some say that I have much knowledge of the subject. I hope your help to edit and save many lives and suffering. Luis Luis cerni (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	hello again, about wernicke. I understand that the main text were missing references, but the final scheme was perfect. You need to understand the theme to give fair value of content and form. Luis Luis cerni (talk) 00:55, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Citation Barnstar

hello, thanks for your answer. My native language is Spanish language and appreciate your corrections. My research about Wernicke has been highly appreciated by the British Medical Society, which has distinguished me asking me to review other neurological research. Please do not fear for the conceptual content. Definitely make mistakes related to the rules of Wikipedia and lenguage. I have chosen to publish also in W. because it is a very fast channel to reach many people. .............. The value of the list is precisely the number of links, that makes sense, please do not remove it, is OK even to WP:NOTLINK .......... This disease is terrible, very widespread and poorly studied. I hope your cooperation in the changes I make in the near future. Cheers!! Luis Luis cerni (talk) 03:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

CONFUSION

	CONFUSION
	knowing your interest in the order in W. , We reported that 2 pages referring to the same and that should be unified. Obviously one is very complete and some not. Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome and Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. Only one difference capital letter in the title. Cheers again. Luis Luis cerni (talk) 03:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

antipsychotic

Hi attaboy, this article, even though has quite a lot of information, and is generally accurate, is a bit confusing for most readers. I am trying to add a simple paragraph summarizing the actions, and making ir clearer, as most people dont know what dopamine is. You should discuss it rather than just deleting the whole thing. Same thing happens with the dopamine article is too scientific and too much detail for most readers who will be put off. Discuss please. Thanks