User talk:Attaboy
Just in case you haven't found it...
[edit]The Teahouse Turns One!
[edit]It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!
|
Teahouse First Birthday Badge |
| Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. |
- --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:27, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
SPI
[edit]Your report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mw0001 was exceptionally thorough and clear. Thanks. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:13, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. At the edit-warring noticeboard, you stated that I had broken the three revert rule on Brad Marchand. The 3RR states that users may not have MORE than 3 reverts on the same page in 24 hours. Given that I have only ever edited the page in question 3 times, and have therefore not broken the 3RR, I'd appreciate it if you would retract your comment at the noticeboard. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 04:42, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- My apologies. On my way. Higgyrun3 (talk) 04:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! Much appreciated. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 04:47, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
First, a good morning to you; concerning your last message on the users talk-page I disagree: he is indeed allowed to blank his talk-page ("Simply deleting others' comments on your talk page is permitted, but most editors prefer archiving....... removal of a comment is taken as proof that the user has read it."). So, I would have left his blanking alone. Just saying. He is plastering me with email half of the time, btw. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out to me. I guess I was being overzealous. I went back and undid my changes Attaboy (talk) 07:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, and no problem, of course. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Hi, I'm LuisCerni who wrote about Wernicke and it seems that you did not like.
This disease is terrible and affects 2% of humanity. Oddly enough, is poorly studied and is convenient an updated Wikipedia page. Long ago I did with that page in Wikipedia in Spanish. Some say that I have much knowledge of the subject. I hope your help to edit and save many lives and suffering. Luis Luis cerni (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| hello again, about wernicke.
I understand that the main text were missing references, but the final scheme was perfect. You need to understand the theme to give fair value of content and form. Luis Luis cerni (talk) 00:55, 5 May 2013 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Citation Barnstar |
| hello, thanks for your answer. My native language is Spanish language and appreciate your corrections. My research about Wernicke has been highly appreciated by the British Medical Society, which has distinguished me asking me to review other neurological research. Please do not fear for the conceptual content. Definitely make mistakes related to the rules of Wikipedia and lenguage. I have chosen to publish also in W. because it is a very fast channel to reach many people.
.............. The value of the list is precisely the number of links, that makes sense, please do not remove it, is OK even to WP:NOTLINK .......... This disease is terrible, very widespread and poorly studied. I hope your cooperation in the changes I make in the near future. Cheers!! Luis Luis cerni (talk) 03:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC) |
CONFUSION
[edit]
|
CONFUSION |
| knowing your interest in the order in W. , We reported that 2 pages referring to the same and that should be unified. Obviously one is very complete and some not.
Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome and Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome. Only one difference capital letter in the title. Cheers again. Luis Luis cerni (talk) 03:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC) |
antipsychotic
[edit]Hi attaboy, this article, even though has quite a lot of information, and is generally accurate, is a bit confusing for most readers. I am trying to add a simple paragraph summarizing the actions, and making ir clearer, as most people dont know what dopamine is. You should discuss it rather than just deleting the whole thing. Same thing happens with the dopamine article is too scientific and too much detail for most readers who will be put off. Discuss please. What I mean is, I am editting in good faith and dont want to scare the shit out of people, but the average mom and dad need to know, very clearly, what these drugs do. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Booklaunch (talk • contribs) 07:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for including the SPI
[edit]I'm not quite sure this rises to barnstar level, but as a regular AIV admin I thank you profusely for including a link to the SPI with your report on Angry4321 (talk · contribs). It's often difficult for us to follow when someone reports an "obvious sock" but we don't know who the sockmaster is nor can we tell. Including that information made reviewing the report (and, obviously, the ensuing indefinite block) so much easier. It's appreciated. Daniel Case (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
"It"
[edit]I noted a message you left for an IP editor at Talk:Physical medicine and rehabilitation#Article is flawed, where you use the third person singular. Whilst the gender of IP editors is impossible to determine without more information, and therefore "it" could be argued to appropriate, it could also be interpreted as disrespectful. You can still address the person in question, instead of seemingly talking over their head as if they were not involved in the discussion. Since your comment links to basic wikipedia policies, including one about being polite, do you feel that these do not apply to you when speaking to IP editors? Lesion (talk) 21:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- On second reading of your comment, it wasn't disrespectful at all. Apologies I just woke up, Lesion (talk) 21:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Beasley
[edit]FYI, his number is listed here: [1] Zagalejo^^^ 00:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 11:58, Monday, November 11, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.
The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.
BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors
[edit]Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Medical Translation Newsletter
[edit]
Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce
This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice.
note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject MedicineSpotlight - Simplified article translation
Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.
Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
- WHO's list of Essential Medicines[2]
- Neglected tropical diseases[3]
- Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.
We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.
What's happening?
- IEG grant
I've (CFCF) taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
- Wikimania 2014
For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
- Integration progress
There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish.
What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
- Swedish
Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that.
Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May. - Dutch
Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie. - Polish
Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article.
(This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration - Arabic
The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.
- Integration guides
Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here [4]
News in short
- To come
- Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
- Proofreading drives
- Further reading
- Translators Without Borders
- Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign
 |
Thanks for reading! To receive a monthly talk page update about new issues of the Medical Translation Newsletter, please add your name to the subscriber's list. To suggest items for the next issue, please contact the editor, CFCF (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Medicine/Translation Taskforce/Newsletter/Suggestions.
Want to help out manage the newsletter? Get in touch with me CFCF (talk · contribs)
For the newsletter from Wikiproject Medicine, see The Pulse
If you are receiving this newsletter without having signed up, it is because you have signed up as a member of the Translation Taskforce, or Wiki Project Med on meta. 22:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
2010 IBSA World Blind Football Championship
[edit]Did you mean to nominate 2010 IBSA World Blind Football Championship for deletion rather than its talk page? Everymorning (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Stub tags
[edit]Please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article which already has a correct specific stub tag, as you did in this edit. It just wastes other people's time. Thanks. PamD 21:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- My bad, I didn't look for the tag at the bottom of the page as I should have Attaboy (talk) 21:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Royer (architect) has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Attaboy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!