Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20190724

< Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

edit

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

edit
  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
  • Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • After examining an article:
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether a problem was found (add {{y}}) or not (add {{n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{y}}. The {{?}} template may be used for articles where you were unable to determine whether or not a violation occurred, but are prepared to remove the article from consideration – either because the material is no longer present in the article, or it is adequately paraphrased so as to no longer be a violation (please specify which).
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)
  • If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Background

edit

SockPuppetForTomruen

The amount of these articles created means that sifting through all the articles to remove plagiarism may be quite time consuming. Definitely should check all eclipses mentioned in those sources. Deep Gabriel (talk) 01:48, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All of the eclipse diagrams are sourced from NASA at [7]. Most should be tagged as Category:Eclipse_predictions_by_Fred_Espenak. Tom Ruen (talk) 10:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I did minimal history of the eclipses, but if I copied text, it is sourced. If it is too close to the original, I welcome someone else to edit it better. I'm not an article writer, and I don't know how to reword things in my own words without making the results inferior to the original sources I referenced. Tom Ruen (talk) 10:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Survey done for just the sock. Did a spot check of the main account where prose was added and found no issues. Wizardman 16:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution survey

edit

Pages 1 through 20

edit
Extended content

Pages 21 through 40

edit
Extended content

Pages 41 through 60

edit

Pages 61 through 80

edit
Extended content

Pages 81 through 100

edit

Pages 101 through 120

edit
Extended content

Pages 121 through 140

edit

Pages 141 through 160

edit

Pages 161 through 180

edit

Pages 181 through 200

edit

Pages 201 through 220

edit

Pages 221 through 240

edit

Pages 241 through 260

edit

Pages 261 through 280

edit

Pages 281 through 300

edit

Pages 301 through 320

edit

Pages 321 through 340

edit

Pages 341 through 360

edit

Pages 361 through 380

edit

Pages 381 through 400

edit

Pages 401 through 420

edit

Pages 421 through 440

edit

Pages 441 through 460

edit

Pages 461 through 480

edit

Pages 481 through 500

edit

Pages 501 through 520

edit

Pages 521 through 540

edit

Pages 541 through 560

edit

Pages 561 through 580

edit

Pages 581 through 600

edit

Pages 601 through 620

edit

Pages 621 through 640

edit

Pages 641 through 660

edit

Pages 661 through 680

edit

Pages 681 through 700

edit

Pages 701 through 720

edit

Pages 721 through 740

edit

Pages 741 through 760

edit

Pages 761 through 780

edit

Pages 781 through 800

edit

Pages 801 through 820

edit

Pages 821 through 840

edit

Pages 841 through 860

edit

Pages 861 through 880

edit

Pages 881 through 900

edit

Pages 901 through 920

edit

Pages 921 through 938

edit

This report generated by ContributionSurveyor.java at 2019-12-20T16:32:48.996107Z.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/20190724&oldid=1171062897"