Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusuf Islahi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yusuf Islahi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Indian Islamist. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 21:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 21:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I cannot see anything in the Australian context which contributes to notability. While certainly the subject's lecturing in Australia is evident, there does not appear to be any third party reporting of those lectures. Witholding a !vote for the time being in hopeful anticipation from other editors who can provide either an Indian context or Islamic context. Aoziwe (talk) 10:13, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Above article is much improved now. Added many new references including newspapers. Replaced dead links and cleaned up. Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SCHOLAR. --BonkHindrance (talk) 20:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:SCHOLAR. Srijanx22 (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete warily though. The best I can find is this. To me it looks as though the subject should be notable, but without being able to find any reliable independent sources, at least in English, and no sign of any editor with an Indian or Islamic context coming forward to offer a sufficient basis for keep, I think delete is the way to go. Aoziwe (talk) 11:12, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Multiple independent reliable sources mention this subject [1] but I am not sure if these are all about this same person. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 08:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the correct version of the above search. The above search was not matching on the full name. There are not many hits. Aoziwe (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.