[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sher Singh Rana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
“This individual does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. They are neither a politician nor a public figure of significance. Being a small-time criminal convicted and serving a sentence in a murder case does not establish notability. There are millions of individuals worldwide who face incarceration, and this alone is not a criterion for inclusion on Wikipedia.” Spider1217 (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spider1217 (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: This person Kingsmasher678 (talk) 20:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and India. Shellwood (talk) 20:40, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep unless I'm missing something huge this seems like an extremely significant crime and the coverage appears to be reasonably in depth. A search found more. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:54, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Delhi, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The subject passes WP:CRIMINAL straightway. As the primary perpetrator of the assassination of Phoolan Devi, a prominent national figure in India, there's a wealth of SigCov readily available online. The argument against the subject's notability is completely off-base, as the volume and quality of sources documenting the incident and its impact easily fulfill GNG.--— MimsMENTOR talk 08:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: i think the subject passes WP:CRIMINAL. Baqi:) (talk) 12:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm not convinced the nominator's rationale is correct at all, especially considering she is a well-known bandit/politician (just look at the legacy section on her). Definitely passes WP:CRIMINAL, specifically perpetrator point 1. Procyon117 (talk) 15:25, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The assassins of well-known politicians are usually notable. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 00:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comments what a hot mess. Bearian (talk) 03:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)