Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Saad Kandhlawi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 14:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Saad Kandhlawi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Indian religious scholar. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 16:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 16:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 16:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:35, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Saad Kandhlawi is the supreme leader of the larges and greatest Muslim movement named Tablighi Jamaat. Requesting to delete this article by User:Authordom, the contributor shows his ignorance about Muhammad Saad Kandhlawi, Islam, Tablighi Jamaat and its present activities.

References:

Keep My conclusion, after looking at the above deletion nominator's recent pattern of nominations at both Afd - India and at Afd - Pakistan, is that he's very biased against all other Islamic religious groups other than his own Barelvi group or school of thought. All one has to do is to look at his recent deletion nominations. He has been nominating for deletion all other Sunni Islam groups – Tablighi Jamaat, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan and Deobandi Group. A clear and obvious case of WP:PPOV where he has been pushing his Personal Point Of View and showing intolerance for other people's religious beliefs. Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as this is the leader of a large Muslim group in India who has many followers and it is not correct to state it as "non notable Indian religious scholar". He seems to be known in Bangladesh as well judging from this [1].--DreamLinker (talk) 04:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Move to draftspace. The subject of the article is notable. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 19:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ngrewal1 and DreamLinker. @Authordom: can you please mention a criteria for the nomination? A mere statement like Non notable Indian religious scholar does not help. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 07:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.