The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – bradv🍁 04:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Janmabhumi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about non notable website janmabhumidaily.com and an epaper generated from its contents. Kutyava (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Explain the popularity with evidence.Kutyava (talk) 09:32, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I must confess I am trying to work out if there are AfD & tagging wars going on between various factions on the Indian Subcontinent at the moment but I can't prove it and whatever. Anyway this publiciation seem to have some substance. As far as I can work out Janmabhumi translates to birthplace which results in a lot of false hists to work through, but I note the following source: [1]. Its not so say the article doesn't have quality issues but in general I get concerned when publications are up at AfD. 21:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talkcontribs) 21:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is being reopened and relisted per conversation at User_talk:Missvain#Closure_of_Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Janmabhumi. The nominator (User:Kutyava) and User:Authordom) has a Arbcom discussion in place and this is just routine. Please check out the publication with a neutral eye to make sure it passes our notability guidelines. We have struck Authordom's !vote from this nomination. Thanks everyone for assuming good faith.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thankyou I've included WikiProject Newspapers on the article talk page. Some of those guidelines look excellent. I am really concerned about how Newspaper/Media articles are being wiped from Wikipedia at AfD.Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.