Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inamul Hasan Kandhlawi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui  08:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inamul Hasan Kandhlawi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Muslim scholar from India. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 16:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 16:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why the emirship of an Indian Islamist movement is notable? ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, he was a emir of the movement. I think the emirship of a movement isn't reason of notability. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, he was office holder of an Islamist organisation. But unable to pass even the WP:GNG. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep he is notable person, being Amir of Tablighi Jamat should engough for WP:GNG. 16:45, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Why he is notable? ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 18:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.