Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharatkosh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Abasar. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bharatkosh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't verify that it meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. I considered a merge to Bangiya Sahitya Parishad or Abasar, but as this is unreferenced anyway, I'm not sure it should be merged, and couldn't identify which of them might be the best redirect target. Boleyn (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Abasar. The language barrier is indeed making sources hard to find. The Abasar article does mention this and cites a source (it's a deadlink, but it's something). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 01:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep On quick search I found source. One should keep in mind that we may find numerous more reliable sources in Bengali language. We may need a person who knows Bengali language. --Human3015^TALK 01:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Don't delete without searching for Bengali sources AusLondonder (talk) 09:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There may be foreign-language sources which would prove notability, but no one has found them. We have to bear in mind that information needs to be verified. A redirect could easily be undone and wouldn't need to wipe the article history. But we can't leave an unreferenced, unverified, potentially unverifiable article on WP. Boleyn (talk) 08:58, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Abasar I suppose as my multiple searches also found nothing good. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.