The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Linguisttalk|contribs 20:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abbas Shah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per recent discussion Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#The criteria of WP:NSPORT here are too inclusive : there is clear consensus that no subject-specific notability guideline, including Notability (sports) is a replacement for or supercedes the General Notability Guideline. Arguments must be more refined than simply citing compliance with a subguideline of WP:NSPORTS in the context of an Articles for Deletion discussion. "meets WP:CRIN" is not sufficient. Therefore I propose this article for deletion. This player is nothing more than WP:MILL Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.