Welcome!

edit

Hi Technetium 99m! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — The Most Comfortable Chair 13:06, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Albertus Soegijapranata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch culture. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sayidiman Suryohadiprojo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Javanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Technetium 99m (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

can't find block log, or reason for blockTechnetium 99m (talk) 07:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

There is no block on this account directly. If you are prevented from editing, please follow the instructions in the message that comes up when you attempt to edit. 331dot (talk) 07:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Your request only needs to be placed once, in the large edit window, not the smaller section header window. You can avoid creating section headers by clicking "edit" instead of "new section" at the top of this page(which is easier to do in full desktop mode, even on a phone/device). 331dot (talk) 07:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • You successfully edited yesterday; if you are in a different physical location than you were yesterday, with a different internet connection, that could be the issue. 331dot (talk) 07:32, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello, I just saw your edit at Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Please do not add excessive wikilinks such as Bible and England in this edit. These links are not likely to aid the reader's understanding significantly. Your addition of excessive wikilinks to many articles are not helpful; they have to be corrected by other editors.

Please think twice before adding wikilinks and please read the relevant section in our manual of style, MOS:OVERLINK. Following MOS:OVERLINK will help you to avoid getting into wikipedia-trouble. Thank you JimRenge (talk) 08:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up Technetium 99m (talk) 06:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

You're still adding inappropriate links, why? FMSky (talk) 07:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

João da Costa Tavares moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, João da Costa Tavares, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~StyyxTalk? 20:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help Technetium 99m (talk) 01:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Olivio Mendonca Moruk moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Olivio Mendonca Moruk, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~StyyxTalk? 20:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: João da Silva Tavares has been accepted

edit
 
João da Silva Tavares, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nyanardsan (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bagindo Azizchan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batavia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Technetium 99m

Thank you for creating Himawan Sutanto.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Technetium 99m

Thank you for creating Soerjadi Soerjadarma.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Abdoel Hakim
added links pointing to Doctor and Batavia
Said Rasad
added links pointing to AMS and Batavia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Mas Pardi

edit

Hello, Technetium 99m,

Thank you for creating Mas Pardi.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Pretty sure notable and not hoax but not finding a clear reliable source to add to page

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slywriter (talk) 13:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, still in the early stages of creating and translating the page Technetium 99m (talk) 14:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mohammad Nazir Isa moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Mohammad Nazir Isa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Singularity42 (talk) 15:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Technetium 99m

Thank you for creating A.K. Widjojoatmodjo.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating Indonesian articles!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:12, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Widodo Budidarmo moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Widodo Budidarmo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 13:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Man, I was still working on translating it from Indonesian to English, now I have to wait days for it to get reviewed, you're experienced how am I supposed to avoid this Technetium 99m (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) I haven't looked at this particular page or article, but sometimes when working on getting things ready for an article before it's put in mainspace, you can create a WP:USERDRAFT. Singularity42 (talk) 13:59, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Translation

edit

Please refrain from copy-pasting machine translated blocks of text. Dahlan Djambek's article contained a lot of noticeable grammatical and text mistakes that I assume originated from poor translation of the Indonesian language version. Juxlos (talk) 16:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I might just suck at Indonesian Technetium 99m (talk) 16:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
The Indonesian version of the articles are fine. The English translations have illegible sections and very weird wording choices “Officer of the Indonesian Army Chief of Staff” or “military figure”. Translate the meaning, not the words. If you do not know what it means, I recommend being a bit more cautious with translating. Juxlos (talk) 23:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Indonesian Wikipedia is just plain bad, with flowery language all around, I usually compare the two versions and make it more factly, but I'm still getting used to the Wikipedia style Technetium 99m (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammad Nazir Isa has been accepted

edit
 
Mohammad Nazir Isa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:46, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Widodo Budidarmo has been accepted

edit
 
Widodo Budidarmo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nyanardsan (talk) 00:54, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Technetium 99m

Thank you for creating Ahmad Yunus Mokoginta.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy tagging

edit

Why did you tag Counter Revolutionary Warfare Unit Court Martial, Fiji as an WP:A3?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:42, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

It may be the wrong tag, but i Do think it should be deleted, the small paragraph says nothing about the unit, it also has no substance, a small paragraph that would probably be lumped in with the actual coup, it say nothing about a court martial, Technetium 99m (talk) 14:31, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

You can't just randomly pick a speedy tag because you think an article should be deleted. Don't speedy tag articles until you understand what they mean and when it is appropriate to use them.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Which tag should I use in the future Technetium 99m (talk) 14:36, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Technetium 99m. Thank you for creating Sintong Panjaitan. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A cup of tea for you!

edit
  Thanks for creating Sintong Panjaitan! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Olivio Mendonca Moruk

edit

  Hello, Technetium 99m. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olivio Mendonca Moruk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Olivio Mendonca Moruk

edit
 

Hello, Technetium 99m. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Olivio Mendonca Moruk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Infoboxes....

edit

You're going to need a better reason than "keeping in line with other articles". Especially when those articles are done badly.

I'm keeping it in line with [[Roaring Twenties and other articles. I'm also not pretending they are "former countries". And I'm using an appropriate infobox.

And it's also just rude to revert people's work without a decent explanation. --Merbabu (talk) 11:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why don't you try fixing all the articles linked here: Template:History of the United States sidebar. Good luck. --Merbabu (talk) 11:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your comment

Discussion

edit

Always helps - just reverting edits with limited explanation, can be a problem. Edit summaries are insufficient space to deal with issues - either the talk page of the articles - or the project noticeboard. Take care, reverting can lead to WP:3RR territory - discussion usually does not and shows more WP:AGF. JarrahTree 11:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mangkunegara VI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adipati.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Riau, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ithaca and Lanham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Ckfasdf (talk) 23:38, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jakarta MRT, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

June 2023

edit

  Hello, Technetium 99m. I noticed that your recent edit to Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 00:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Distracted boyfriend, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insider.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

edit
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Operation Alpha 29

edit

Hi: I am a coordinator for the Wikiproject military history. I have reviewed the assessment of the article Operation Alpha 29. Can you clarify these two sentences: "They also found traces in the river and saw three people next to the river but immediately disappeared. The task force team then tried to approach the unknown people in silence." It seems that the word "they" should be inserted between "immediately" and "disappeared." If so, does the next sentence need to be clarified or expanded. Otherwise, if the people disappeared, does it easily follow that the team approached the unknown people in silence without further explanation? I realize you did not write the article but only edited it. On the other hand, you appear to be the only recent editor who might know anything about this, can read the source and make any change that might be needed. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bahlil Lahadalia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maluku.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply