Sfs90

Second round for Haitian Senate

Hi Since 1/3 of the Senate will be elected in October for the first round and the second round will take place in January 2017, I propose is renaming "Haitian parliamentary election, 2015-16" in "Haitian parliamentary election, 2015-17" or to create an article on the two rounds of the Senate vote. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

It's done. --Panam2014 (talk) 18

57, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Telenorte, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Calama and Julio Martínez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christian Democratic Team of the Spanish State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Left. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Democratic Agreement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Thayer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Valdivia's Deutsche Zeitung

Please read WP:PROD. Anybody (including IPs and article creators themselves) can remove a PROD and it should then not be placed back. Doing so repeatedly is disruptive. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 14:50, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Democratic Party (Chile), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1973 coup d'etat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberal Progressive Party (Spain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Liberal Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

changes made on cds peoples party

Good afternoon about a week ago you made changes on the cds people's party page. I had noticed a mistake and decided to correct it. You changed this information back to what it previously was which was information back from 2004 that did not have much to do with the topic. Thank you for your understanding — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deportivo2016 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

PDECAT/PDECat and PDPC/PDC

On the PDECAT issue, ok, I won't engage on endless edit warring on this. PDECAT may surely lead to confusion (because "P", "D" and "E" stand for their own words, whereas "CAT" doesn't). PDECAT and PDECat have been used interchangeably, and here in Wikipedia we're not required to strictly abide for a party's registered name in a template (the UK's Conservative Party registered name is Conservative and Unionist Party, but its template uses just "Conservative"). However, the party is new and still in the process of forming itself, with the name itself being a rather rushed one after their previous one was cancelled, and with it now seeking a logo (which may or not may change how the acronym is spelled). Since there are no new elections expected anytime soon, we can still wait for seeing what the most-commonly used form of the name is.

For PDPC/PDC I don't agree. There are options for both of them, but you currently can't claim what the Ministry of the Interior says because the coalition is not registered anymore. Both are valid, but PDC is more consistent with how the coalition was spelled ("Pacte Democratic per Catalunya", not "Pacte Democratic Per Catalunya").[1]. It's also more consistent with its successor's spelling, CDC. Impru20 (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

More: In Google, for Book searching pdc "pacte democratic per catalunya" gives you 36 results, whereas pdpc "pacte democratic per catalunya" gives you only 2 results. On a normal Google search, pdc pacte democratic per catalunya gives you 3,290 results, whereas pdpc pacte democratic per catalunya gives you only 152. It's pretty obvious which one is more common and widely used. Impru20 (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

So, of course, I'm not saying that "PDPC" is wrong, but that "PDC" is more correct in this case. I'd have chosen "PDPC" if finally the original name for PDECAT had remained, to prevent confusion, but it's no longer the case now and the coalition was obviously much more widely known and shown in sources as "PDC" than "PDPC". ;) Impru20 (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sfs90. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

2015 Illapel earthquake

I noticed that you moved the page 2015 Illapel earthquake to 2015 Coquimbo earthquake by copying and pasting material. Per Wikipedia:Moving a page, this is not the proper way to move a page. At the top of every page is a "Move" button which should be used instead. That will work in cases where there is either no redirect at the new title or where the redirect has no edits. This will not work in this situation, however, because neither of those conditions are met. That aside, why did you move the page? What is your rationale? At this point, you must initiate a move request if you think the current title is problematic for whatever reason. Thanks. Dustin (talk) 05:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

24 horas al día

Good evening!, I can understand all you said me, and i value all your effort, but that is not the proper way to move a page, and your argument is not valid, Why?, belive me they aren't the same show, they can share a main brand, but they are totally different, as example ITN (a british news company) as 24 horas in Chile, they do 5 News (of Channel 5), Channel 4 News (of Channel 4) and ITV News (from ITV), that is amazing because only BBC One has an independient news programme, maybe they had the same production, but at end they are different. Other example is BBC News (A cable channel, and too a producer of news programmes of BBC), for example they produce BBC News at Six, BBC News at Five, BBC News at Ten and all have different pages. I hope that you understood what I wanted to say, it is better have all separated that all tangled, and disagreements are resolved through consensus-based discussion, not by tightly sticking to rules and procedures. We are all brothers, ¿Why we fight?, better don't destroy others work, and help me to create nice contents. Have happy holidays! If u have a problem or a concern, say me, I'm here always. Finally a big thank, for take care of Chilean based contents! I appreciate you ChocolateCherryNight (talk) 23:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

If u want to make a big change as u want, u should make a proposal into Talk page, not here, and resolve it by consensus-based discussion, sorry that's all, you and i, we aren't Wikipedia God's, there are others users, talk there. --ChocolateCherryNight (talk) 23:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

24 horas al día

Please, can you stop to censorship Wikipedia. Please don't make that type of editions. At this point go to Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. Remember: The purpose of the discussion page is to achieve consensus upon a course of action. Individuals will express strong opinions and may even "vote". To the extent that voting occurs, the votes are merely a means to gauge the degree of consensus reached so far. Manuel.21 (talk) 23:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Pregunta

Yo sé que en general te disgusta casi cualquier aporte que hago, y ten la seguridad que al igual que en Wikipedia en español dejaré de colaborar en artículos sobre Chile en inglés. Pero tengo mi duda sobre el revertir el template de shortname del PPD, que al menos en inglés no se entiende que quiere decir y que todos los demás templates usan nombres abreviados y no acrónimos. Ni siquiera diste una explicación sobre la razón para la reversión antes de hacerlo. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 03:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Removing BLP Prod from Aryane Steinkopf

Hi. I removed the BLP Prod tag from Aryane Steinkopf because there are many Portuguese-language sources available about this person. I added some where I was able to confirm what they mean using Google Translate, but I hope someone with more fluency in Portuguese will be able to add more. If you're still concerned about the article feel free to AfD it. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 08:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Primarias 2017 Chile

Hola. ¿No crees que sería mejor tener un sólo artículo para las primarias presidenciales de 2017, como se hizo en 2013? Así se puede tener una tabla con los resultados de ambas primarias y comparar. Además, no creo que ambos artículos sean de una extensión tal que justifique separarlos. Saludos. Pristino (talk) 19:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

"Standard used on these templates do not include indirect elections"

Hi Have you got a source ? --Panam2014 (talk) 13:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

There wouldn't be a source for this. It's a long-standing consensus amongst editors that has been in place for at least 10 years I'd say. If you want evidence of other editors being aware of it, here are some: [2][3][4][5][6] Cheers, Number 57 13:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

That prove anything. There are no rule. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Nominating templates for deletion

Please be aware that you cannot nominate templates for deletion at AfD; I have closed your deletion discussion for this reason. Please use WP:TfD instead when nominating templates for deletion. Thank you. SkyWarrior 18:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Similarly, WP:RFD is the location for redirects that you would like deleted. Please do not turn redirects into articles purely for the sake of attempting to game the system and get the pages deleted out of process. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sfs90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, United Conservative Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, United Conservative Party. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – United Conservative Party (disambiguation). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at United Conservative Party (disambiguation). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

United Conservative Party

I disagree with your move and I will likely request that it be moved back. Please reply on my talk page. Me-123567-Me (talk) 03:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

There is a move discussion started at Talk:United Conservative Party. Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of United Conservative Party (Canada)

A tag has been placed on United Conservative Party (Canada) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 07:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

United Conservative Party (Canada) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect United Conservative Party (Canada). Since you had some involvement with the United Conservative Party (Canada) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 08:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Haitian general election, 1988

Just a quick query on the parties of the presidential candidates – you have Lysias Verret down as representing the Party of the National Rally. However, according to your source, the party was not recognised until 1995... Any idea whether Verret was actually a PARAN candidate? Number 57 22:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Fazio's Shopping Bag) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Fazio's Shopping Bag, Sfs90!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Passes review. Optional, but an infobox would add to the article

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Unione Sudamericana Emigrati Italiani.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Unione Sudamericana Emigrati Italiani.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi Sfs90! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I’m inviting you to join other people who edit conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where group members can ask questions and meet new colleagues. You'll also discover DYK: the easiest and funnest way to get your article on the Main Page. I hope to see you there! – Lionel^(talk) 07:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Muricy Curitiba 1976.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

S.A.C.I Falabella

Hey, noticed you have edited S.A.C.I Falabella description and eliminated most of the last updates. Just wondering why you find outdated information more relevant that the one included by the Company? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.10.170.90 (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sfs90. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Santiago2023.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Santiago2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Gala-Sears) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gala-Sears.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Gala-Sears. Note that other editors have questioned whether this organization is notable enough for its own Wikipedia article. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the page. If these concerns are not addressed, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Justificación de borrado rápido falsa

Buenos días. Me quería dirigir a Ud.. para pedirle que se abstuviese de realizar ediciones sin explicación suficiente. El archivo File:Logo Partido Republicano (2019) fue nominado por Ud. para el borrado rápido 2 veces, y en ambas yo había revertido la nominación, ya que las causas que se presentaron no son ciertas y se basan em especulación. Le ruego corrija este malentendido. Gracias James2813 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:08, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Santiago 2023 Pan American bid logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Santiago 2023 Pan American bid logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Union, Progress and Democracy

Hi Sfs90, I noticed that back in 2016, you added a section to the UPyD page discussing the WP:REFBOMB. Could you please take a look at the changes I've made to limit the number of ideologies in the infobox? Do you think it's okay, or would you prefer a different group of ideologies to be listed? Thanks, Ezhao02 (talk) 21:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Radixsaurus (talk) 22:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

I can't take seriously your warnings spams and i don't want to know if you have personal problems with me. We are a community and you must learn to tolerate and speak with reason before blocking every single edition. On this issue, a months ago, i stopped some important editions only for your concern and you couldn't made a constructive colaboration. If that's your procedure i simply have no choice than insist on this work. Radixsaurus (talk) 22:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Radixsaurus (talk) 22:52, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

• Sfs90, I am extremely close to blocking you for edit warring as well. WP:3RR is a bright-line rule and you've past it at this point on multiple pages. The only reason I haven't blocked you is that the potential disruption from making disputed changes across many templates can be far reaching as they are transcluded to so many articles and introduce accessibility issues. If you find yourself in a situation like this again, it's imperative that you don't get caught up in an edit war, and that you report the editor to WP:3RN to avoid being blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Haitian Tet Kale Party logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haitian Tet Kale Party logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Cuba SSM

AFAICT, the law comes into effect when published in the gazette, provided 5 days have passed since the referendum. it hasn't yet been 5 days. — kwami (talk) 23:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi. I'm sending you a transcript of what the Official Gazette points out in the header of its extraordinary edition today (which you can review in full here). The original text in Spanish says "NOTA: En esta edición de la Gaceta Oficial de la República de Cuba se publica la Ley No. 156 “Código de las Familias”, de 22 de julio de 2022, refrendada por el Presidente de la República el 26 de septiembre de 2022, al ser ratificada por Referendo Popular, realizado el 25 de septiembre del año en curso.", while in English it could be translated as "NOTE: In this edition of the Official Gazette of the Republic of Cuba, Law No. 156 "Family Code" of July 22, 2022, signed into law by the President of the Republic on September 26, 2022, after being ratified by Popular Referendum, held on September 25 of the current year, is published." Also, the forty-fifth final disposition (stated on the last page of that Official Gazette document) states this: "CUADRAGESIMOQUINTA: El presente Código entra en vigor una vez ratificado en el Referendo Popular a que se somete por mandato constitucional." (translated in English: "FORTY-FIFTH: This Code enters into force once ratified in the Popular Referendum to which it is submitted by constitutional mandate.") There's nothing that states something about a "5-day period". Sfs90 (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Good enough for me! — kwami (talk) 02:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sfs90. Thank you for your work on Huanchaca street scandal. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating the article. I hope you will create more articles in the future! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:31, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Force is with Cristal Beer

Hello! Your submission of The Force is with Cristal Beer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Z1720 (talk) 19:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Sfs90. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/The Force is with Cristal Beer.
Message added 07:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coalicion Galega.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coalicion Galega.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)