Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019

2019 Arbitration Committee Elections

Status as of 15:59 (UTC), Sunday, 10 November 2024 (Purge)

  • Thank you for participating in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections. The certified results have been posted.
  • You are invited to leave feedback on the election process.

The seventeenth annual election for the English Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee took place in November and December 2019.

Election process

edit

Before the election

edit
  1. Election Request for Comment (from 00:00, 1 September until 23:59, September 30) → the pre-election RfC is to run for 30 days in September.
  2. Electoral Commission Request for Comment → the Electoral Commission is to be selected across three weeks in October:
    (i) 7-day self-nomination period (from Saturday 00:00, 5 October until Friday 23:59, 11 October) → open to users who: a) are at least 18 years old, b) satisfy the access to nonpublic personal data policy, and c) are otherwise eligible to vote.
    (ii) 7-day evaluation period (from Saturday 00:00, 12 October until Friday 23:59, 18 October) → in practice, community feedback is open throughout the self-nom period
    (iii) 7-day selection deadline (must be completed by Friday 00:00, 25 October)

Election timeline

edit
  1. Self-nomination period (from Sunday 00:00, 03 November 2019 until Tuesday 23:59, 12 November 2019, UTC) → interested editors are invited to submit a candidate statement. An editor is eligible to stand as a candidate who:
    (i) has a registered account and has made at least 500 mainspace edits before 1 November 2019,
    (ii) not subject to active blocks or site-bans,
    (iii) meets the Wikimedia Foundation's criteria for access to non-public data, is willing to sign the Foundation's non-public information confidentiality agreement, and
    (iv) has disclosed any previous or alternate accounts in their election statements (legitimate accounts which have been declared to the Arbitration Committee before the close of nominations do not need to be publicly disclosed).
  2. Voting period (from Tuesday 00:00, 19 November 2019 until Monday 23:59, 02 December 2019, UTC) → eligible voters can vote on the candidates, using the SecurePoll system. An editor is eligible to vote who:
    (i) has registered an account before Tuesday 00:00, 1 October 2019
    (ii) has made at least 150 mainspace edits before Friday 00:00, 1 November 2019
    (iii) has made at least 10 live edits (in any namespace) in the one year prior to Friday 00:00, 1 November 2019 and,
    (iv) is not blocked from the English Wikipedia at the time of their vote.
  3. Scrutineering period (immediately following the voting period) → scrutineers, consisting of stewards whose main wikis are not the English Wikipedia, will check the votes (e.g. for duplicate, missing, and ineligible votes), and compile a tally of the results. The instructions for scrutineers are outlined here.

Community notification

edit

When voting starts, a mass message will be sent out to all eligible voters that have been active within the last 12 months and meet other criteria. If this cannot be done within 72 hours of the voting starting, the election committee may elect to notify all eligible voters.

Results

edit

Following the voting period, the scrutineers examined the votes and released a tally of the results. The tally ranks candidates by their performance according to the criteria for success in this election, defined as the number of votes cast in support of the candidate divided by the total number of votes cast both for and against (commonly described as "support over support plus oppose" or "S/(S+O)"). "Neutral" preferences are not counted in this metric. A total of 1783 ballots were cast including 88 duplicates, leaving 1695 votes. Twenty-two votes were further invalidated, thereby resulting in 1673 votes which are tallied below.

Candidate Support Neutral[note 1] Oppose Net[note 2] Percentage[note 3] Result
Newyorkbrad (talk · contribs) 803 665 205 598 79.66% Two-year term
Casliber (talk · contribs) 709 769 195 514 78.43% Two-year term
Worm That Turned (talk · contribs) 729 713 231 498 75.94% Two-year term
KrakatoaKatie (talk · contribs) 742 614 317 425 70.07% Two-year term
Xeno (talk · contribs) 618 781 274 344 69.28% Two-year term
SoWhy (talk · contribs) 547 861 265 282 67.36% Two-year term
Beeblebrox (talk · contribs) 611 756 306 305 66.63% Two-year term
David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 505 909 259 246 66.10% Two-year term
Maxim (talk · contribs) 486 936 251 235 65.94% One-year term
DGG (talk · contribs) 599 726 348 251 63.25% One-year term
Bradv (talk · contribs) 506 864 303 203 62.55% One-year term
Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) 485 889 299 186 61.86%
Thryduulf (talk · contribs) 518 831 324 194 61.52%
Gadfium (talk · contribs) 461 913 299 162 60.66%
Llywrch (talk · contribs) 428 961 284 144 60.11%
Enterprisey (talk · contribs) 322 1002 349 −27 47.99%
Richwales (talk · contribs) 356 921 396 −40 47.34%
Kudpung (talk · contribs) 409 711 553 −144 42.52%
Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 388 714 571 −183 40.46%
The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 390 693 590 −200 39.80%
Isarra (talk · contribs) 377 718 578 −201 39.48%
Calidum (talk · contribs) 207 932 534 −327 27.94%
  1. ^ All voters were required to register a preference of either "Support", "Neutral", or "Oppose" for each candidate. The "Neutral" column is simply the total votes for which voters did not select the Support or Oppose option.
  2. ^ Net = Support − Oppose
  3. ^ Percentage = (Support / (Support + Oppose)) * 100 (rounded to 2 decimal places)
Results certified by
  1. Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  2. einsbor talk 07:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Base (talk) 16:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vacant seats

edit

For the 2019 election, four current arbitrators will remain on the committee. This will leave 11 vacant seats to be filled in this election: eight seats may be filled for either a two-year term (January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2021) or a one-year term (January 1, 2020 – December 31, 2020), and three seats may be filled for a one-year term only. Candidates will be appointed in decreasing order of their percentage of support, as calculated by support/(support + oppose), until all seats are filled or no more candidates meet the required support percentage. There will be a neutral option; choosing this option will not affect the support percentage for the candidate, and will be treated as though you did not vote in the election with respect to that candidate.

The minimum percentage of support that is required is 60% for a two-year term, and 50% for a one-year term. Candidates who receive 60% support will be appointed to a full two-year term if they are in the top eight of support percentage, and to a one-year term if they are between ninth and eleventh place of support percentage, inclusive. If there are any remaining seats to be filled, candidates who receive ≥50% support but fall below the 60% threshold will be appointed to serve a one-year term. In this event, if the candidate is in the top eight of support percentage, the seat will be refilled by a one-year term in the next election. If any of the four current arbitrators in midterm resign or otherwise leave the committee before the start of voting, the seat they vacate will be filled for a one-year term in this election. If there are more vacant seats than candidates with the required minimum support, those seats will remain vacant until the next election.

User:Z1720User:ToBeFreeUser:SdrqazUser:MaximUser:HJ MitchellUser:FireflyUser:CabayiUser:AoidhUser:Worm That TurnedUser:WugapodesUser:Opabinia regalisUser:IznoUser:EnterpriseyUser:Donald AlburyUser:CabayiUser:BeeblebroxUser:SilkTorkUser:PrimefacUser:MoneytreesUser:L235User:GuerilleroUser:GeneralNotabilityUser:CaptainEekUser:Barkeep49User:PrimefacUser:MaximUser:L235User:BDDUser:BradvUser:CaptainEekUser:Barkeep49Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020

Coordination

edit

The Arbitration Committee elections are organized entirely by community volunteers, independent of the Arbitration Committee itself. Before every election, an RfC is held so that the community may propose and implement any changes to the format of the election. Any rules or practices that were not specifically changed by the RfC are carried over from the previous election.

Ordinary editors who help run the day-to-day operations of the election are known as coordinators. Election coordinators have no special authority or abilities, but facilitate the smooth running of the election in any way that is needed. Editors interested in helping run the election can add their names here.

The three-member Electoral Commission is appointed by the community in a separate RfC before the election. Commissioners are responsible for addressing any unforeseen problems that may arise in the election process, and for adjudicating any disputes relating to the election. The Election Commission has the full mandate and authority to decisively settle any issues that arise. In addition, while the Electoral Commission itself is not inherently responsible for logistics of the election, Commissioners should ensure that preparations for the election move forward in a timely fashion. As such, Commissioners are de facto coordinators and usually have an active role in running the election.

The last group of volunteers are the scrutineers. Three scrutineers are drawn from Stewards who primarily work at other projects. Scrutineers are responsible for providing oversight for the voting process itself. Scrutineers' responsibilities include guarding against abuse and technical errors, ensuring that valid votes are counted while invalid ones are discarded, and confirming that the final tally of votes is correct and certifying the official results. Scrutineers work behind the scenes and are not otherwise involved in coordinating the more minor areas of the election. The Electoral Commission is the liaison between the scrutineers and the rest of the community.

Guides

edit

For candidates

edit

Nominations for candidates will open at 00:00 UTC, 3 November and will close at 23:59 UTC, 12 November. During this time, any editor in good standing who meets the criteria stated in the "Election timeline" section above may nominate themselves by following the instructions to create a candidate statement on the candidates page. Once a candidate has made their statement, they may proceed to answer individual questions as they wish (see the questions page for details and instructions). Candidates may continue to answer questions until the end of the voting period (23:59 UTC, 2 December).

For voters

edit

Once candidates have nominated themselves, voters are invited to review and discuss them. Voters may ask questions throughout the election.

To facilitate their discussions and judgements, voters are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the candidates. This can be done through reading the candidate statements, the answers to the questions put to each candidate (linked from their candidate statements), and the discussion of each candidate (a centralized collection of which will be made available at the discussion page). In addition, a summary guide to candidates will be made available, and augmented by a set of personal guides by individual voters.

Voting will run for 14 days, from 00:00 UTC, 19 November to 23:59 UTC, 2 December. The process will be conducted using the SecurePoll extension which ensures that individual voters' decisions will not be publicly viewable (although technical information about voters, such as their IP address and user-agents, will be visible to the WMF-identified election administrators and scrutineers).

Voters will be invited to choose one of three options for each candidate: "Support", "Oppose" or "Neutral"; and the number of "Support", "Oppose" or "Neutral" preferences a voter can express is otherwise limited only by the number of candidates. After voters have entered their choices for all of the candidates and submitted their votes, they may revisit and change their decisions, but attempting to do so will require expressing preferences for all candidates from scratch. Because of the risk of server lag, voters are advised to cast their vote at the latest an hour before the close of voting to ensure their vote will be counted.