RR
Welcome~
editWelcome!
Hello, RR, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Lisatwo 13:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Catalan navbox
editHi. I replied on your question in village pump (technical), just in case you didn't realise. HУтaяtalk2mecontribs 20:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, so you want the England and Scotland part above to be shown, but when you press show, it shows the both and UK, which is what both has in common. Hmm... that requires good programming sense. I've tried but to no avail, or I misunderstood your problem. HУтaяtalk2mecontribs 22:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
reply
editI meant {{winners}}, and if you watch articles of the previous Champions League you'll see its got it as well chandler • 20:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Casals
editI have reverted your deletion of my edit to the discussion page. As I stated in my edit summary, it might be unconventional to place it at the top of the page but the idea is for newcomers to see it and check out the link I provided - a Wikipedia guideline which happens to much clearer on the issue than the one you choose to substitute it.
My rationale for sticking it up at the top is that many inexperienced editors make good faith edits without first having read the appropriate guidelines. If you wish to discuss the matter further, I'd be happy to do so here, on the Casals discussion page or over at my talk page, but please do not delete my edit again without first obtaining consensus. Thank you.--Technopat (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Kingsroad.jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kingsroad.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:05, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
edit You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Winter Is Coming. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Network Template TFD 2
editYou participated in the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_October_7#Network_templates. A new discussion about the same templates has been restarted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_October_19#Network_templates_2. Feel free to express your thoughts at the new discussion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:54, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
editHi. When you recently edited The North Remembers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alan Taylor and Game of Thrones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
editHi. When you recently edited Owen Teale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Game of Thrones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Compromise of Caspe
editHello, RR, ¿why you deleted my contributions? The compromise begining the March 29. One reference: Cronologies històriques Valencianes de Jaume I fins als nostres dies.--EeuHP (talk) 10:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Excuse me, RR. I asked twice about the issue and you have not answered me. Why did you eliminate the participation of nine commissioners? Give me an explanation.--EeuHP (talk) 11:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- I do not think it's controversial. The two kingdoms and a principality are on the Iberian Peninsula. The remaining territories of the Crown of Aragon are islands or are in Italy. But if you still do not convince you, we can put Nine commissioners of Aragon, Valencia and Catalonia to elect a new aragonese king after the death of Martin I without issue.--EeuHP (talk) 12:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I think that is not bad expand minimally. This is a summary table. The existence of nine delegates in Caspe is an objetive fact. The circumstances of the overall process are specified in the article.--EeuHP (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
DYK for And Now His Watch Is Ended
editOn 30 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article And Now His Watch Is Ended, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Game of Thrones episode "And Now His Watch Is Ended" introduced the fictional tongue of High Valyrian on television, which was created by a linguist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/And Now His Watch Is Ended. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
DYK for The Rains of Castamere
editOn 16 June 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Rains of Castamere, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the central event of the Game of Thrones episode "The Rains of Castamere" was the initial inspiration for the producers to adapt A Song of Ice and Fire for television? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Rains of Castamere. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andbank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luxemburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
A page you started (Andbank) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Andbank, RR!
Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
The page is reviewed.
To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Article Castle Black
editHello. I've reverted your blanking for now. If you believe that the redirect should be deleted, please bring the matter up at WP:RFD. Thanks. KJ click here 12:46, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, RR. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, RR. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, RR. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editOrphaned non-free image File:Baker Tilly international logo 2018.png
editThanks for uploading File:Baker Tilly international logo 2018.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Charles III requested move discussion
editThere is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place
editSince you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:18, 30 July 2023 (UTC)