August 2018

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Do I Wanna Know? does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - FlightTime (open channel) 18:58, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Motörhead (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:38, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Changes to genres require discussion on the article's talk page first. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Marcos FTO. You have new messages at FlightTime's talk page.
Message added 17:50, 24 August 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

- FlightTime (open channel) 17:50, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Eruption (instrumental), you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:05, 29 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Genre list

edit

When editing genre list, only the first instance is capitalized. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Cult of Personality (song). SummerPhDv2.0 23:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ANI

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Dan56 (talk) 04:34, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 04:35, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at No Quarter (song), you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 17:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Genres

edit

Look, if you want to change genres, sourced or not, you should discuss the changes first or they will just get reverted. Doesn't matter what you think they should be or what sources say, consensus is the best way to do it. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 17:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

October 2018

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Surrender (Cheap Trick song). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 18:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Those genres have been there for years, if you want them changed, take it to the talk page and stop edit warring. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 18:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Faith (George Michael song). SummerPhDv2.0 04:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Marcos FTO. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fat Bottomed Girls. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pinging users

edit

Please review Template:Reply to/doc in regards to when the ping works and when it doesn't. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 15:55, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Fat Bottomed Girls.

Do not remove any discussion once it's been responded to - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 15:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Removing a discussion

edit

(edit conflict) It doesn't matter. You do not own that page or that discussion. If you start a discussion and then change your mind and remove it, that's fine, but once someone else comments in that discussion removing it is blatant content removal and vandalism. You removed my comments, you never remove other editors comments. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 16:18, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Power metal origin

edit

In summaries for edits you have made to articles such as Rising, Queensrÿche, and Stargazer, you claim that power metal did not exist in 1976, or even by 1983. Do you have a source for this claim? CJ-Moki (talk) 08:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

In the own page of power metal, is cited that the genre emerged in the mid-1980s, and that Rainbow was a precursor of the genre. But the term was created in the mid-1980s, and its movement crystalized in the mid-1990s.[1][2]
Note: The heavy metal genre is sourced in Rising and Queensrÿche (and power metal isn't sourced in this). --Marcos FTO (talk) 12:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
  1. ^ "Power Metal". Guitar Master Class. The word Power metal was first used in the middle of the 80s to some of the new metal bands that appered. But it was first in the middle of the 90s that the power metal genre established when the former speed metal band Helloween came with their album Kepper of the seven keys part 1 and 2.
  2. ^ "Power Metal Music Genre Overview". AllMusic. As a movement, though, power metal crystallized during the mid-'90s

Infobox song parameters

edit

Please note that the addition of {{hlist}}, {{flatlist}}, and {{plainlist}} to several parameters in Infobox song is unnecessary, since they already built in – just format the items as a normal bulleted list and the rest is done automatically (see individual parameter explanations in the documentation). —Ojorojo (talk) 18:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wanted Man (Ratt song), you may be blocked from editing. SolarFlash (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wanted Man (Ratt song). SolarFlash (talk) 15:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Removing sourced info

edit

Why did you remove the genre here? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 19:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Because there's no specific mention of the jangle pop genre for this song.
"Reckoning runs through a set of ten jangle pop songs that are different not only in sound but in style from the debut" is more about the album than its songs (correct me if I'm wrong). --Marcos FTO (talk) 19:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Marcos FTO, Thanks--good thinking. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 22:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

St. Anger

edit

Fine, my concern was Speed metal. Metallica is not speed metal. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost – Part 2

edit

Hi. Regarding your edit on Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost – Part 2 here, please do not cite student newspapers. Their writers are basically no better than bloggers with no credentials as they are almost always students writing for credit, and student newspapers are rarely, if ever, considered valid sources, even for critical opinions. Also, do not exceed more than 10 reviews in table form per MOS:ALBUM and Template:Album ratings. Please remember these things next time you add sources to an album article. Thank you. Ss112 08:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

You win this round, Marcos.

edit

Well played. But one day I will be back with more reliable sources . . . Lynchenberg (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Why did you changed the Security gender? worldbeat and new wave had reliable and acurated sources Ane Crawley (talk) 18:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hounding

edit

Please do not Hound my edits like you did with Out of Our Heads--Fruitloop11 (talk) 21:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm not hounding you, I'm just fixing some of your edits, I do this with a lot of users. Please, just don't bother me. Thanks. --Marcos FTO (talk) 22:03, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am allowed to contact you if you are causing me stress or annoying me. Please read WP:IDENTIFYUNCIVIL and WP:EW It describes a widely accepted standard that all editors should normally follow. Changes made to it should reflect consensus.’’’ --Fruitloop11 (talk) 22:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Carte-blanche on Genre's

edit

I don't understand, considering how much of a pain in the ass it is to monitor genre changes, We all revert genre edits and ask for sources and consensus and here you are working your own program changing genre's willy-nilly. You also need consensus on genre changes, you do not have carte-blanche on the genre parameter. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Removal Question

edit

I noticed that you removed Gothic rock from the page for Reptile. Why? 2600:6C5A:417F:794E:E400:4C15:61F0:5374 (talk) 00:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I removed it because you provided no source for gothic rock. (See also: Genre warrior and Verifiability) --Marcos FTO (talk) 22:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply