User talk:Andonic/Archive 24

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Skunkboy74 in topic Protection Template?

Request

edit

Request you to revert back the Great power article that existed before the personal change by UKPhoenix79 to the version that existed with Hobiehunter. I would like you to warn UKPhoenix79 from removing things in the article with credible links and pushing his own version without any discussion or agreement. Thank you.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

No. You are not supposed to endorse personal opinion of persons. Check the history. It was agreed by many members and the previous version was the standard, which was changed in a single edit by a person and put his personal opinion without considering reaching any consensus. I don't think such a change is allowed in Wikipedia. I will be making to the previous version of the article. Let there be consensus for any change and then a change. But personal opinion will not be allowed.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 02:10, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Check the history of the article. You will come to know. The current version (the blocked one) is done without reaching a consensus by a single person. It's his personal version. Revert it back to the original version. Then let the discussion to continue. Where is India. You can see that India was removed in a single move.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 02:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Request you to change the article to previous version by UKPhoenix79. Some unknown user 24.205.234.250 has changed it resulting in the removal of India from the emerging power list. Request you to bring the article to the last level by UKPhoenix79. Also request user 24.205.234.250 be banned for vandalism.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm supportive of further measures against User:24.205.234.250. Was blocked yesterday for 24h, used proxy instead of stopping. Have taken this to admin incidents and 3RR noticeboard (there are two entries on latter). I believe though that it was User:UKPhoenix79 who changes India per this diff. Don't forget to provide one or more diffs in the future when you want to make a request or discuss something. Species8473 (talk) 08:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Hindu

edit

The issue regarding The Hindu was about the adherence to basic tenets of Wikipedia as it is visible in start Para itself that, Substantiation was not given to the entries made , besides raising trivial objections to thwart well prrof backed alternative views . A first hand look on to the article may guide to the same--Sahyadhri (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

History of timekeeping devices

edit

I do believe that we've dealt with everything that needs to be done before FAC. Do you think it's ready? Keilana|Parlez ici 16:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The FAC is up, should I spam all the Squad members to let them know? Keilana|Parlez ici 17:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Request for peer review and/or copyediting

edit

Hi. I am trying to get the article Insane Clown Posse to FA quality. Would you be interested in taking a look at it and offering some advice over at the WikiProject Biography peer review, or performing a copyedit on it? (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 22:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC))Reply

Happy First Day of Summer!

edit

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008

edit

The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot (owner) 23:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

*Sighs* Even more help

edit

Now I'm dealing with this user: 217.21.112.15. They seem to keep changing sports articles to suit their opinion, and are emphasising the facts related to cricket, to make them stand out. Such include changing the pages of Cricket and Football in England. When I warned them, I get called a dumb illiterate Here. I may have replied a little harshly, but I take back the comment I made on said user's talk page (Here). Is there any way of making this user see reason without it resorting in an attack? --Maurice45 (talk) 18:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good friend

edit

We've had so much fun. But nothing gold can last. It is time for me to move on.

I won't forget the time we spent huggling, editing, and bragging about my bots.

Farewell good friend. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 01:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fuck that shit ;-). You on GTalk? CWii(Talk|Contribs) 21:02, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of Detroit Red Wings head coaches

edit
  The Editor's Barnstar
For editing a hockey related article. For helping me get List of Detroit Red Wings head coaches back up at FLC (and literally "reviving" the table), I « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie hereby award you this Barnstar. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 01:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for fixing the comments as well :D « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 01:26, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protection

edit

Hello!

Please let me know if you'd rather not deal with this and if you think I should go through the prescribed channels but I wanted to see if you wouldn't mind semi-protecting Petar Brzica article the way you semi-protected Srbosjek (knife). The two articles are on related subjects and the issues that were alleviated by semi-protection on Srbosjek are the same issued by the same IP editors that are currently being experienced on Petar Brzica.

Thanks for your time either way and do let me know if you'd prefer I take this elsewhere.

Peace! SWik78 (talkcontribs) 16:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

FAC

edit

Hey, which books couldn't you find in Gbooks? Maybe I can help dig them up? bibliomaniac15 19:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't think we need to put page numbers for the PDF, do we? As for ref number 7, I checked it out from the library, and I'll be using Amazon's "Search inside" feature to help me jog my memory and find the page numbers. bibliomaniac15 22:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Maybe I should have elaborated. a is 55, b is 52, and c is 130. I'll fix it. bibliomaniac15 01:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cooperation with Rjecina?

edit

Why you are blindlessly supporting this user? You are protecting articles regularly when he made reverts and even worse - re-adding his tags and reverting to his version? --72.75.24.245 (talk) 03:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

My RfA

edit

Hello AndonicO! I just stopped by to tell you that I have open a request for adminship, here. If you would add a nomination, weather it be a support, oppose, or neutral, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thank you! -[[Ryan]] (me) (talk) 22:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

J. A. Comment sock

edit

It seems you're around (at least as of a few minutes ago). I've been told that this user is a sock of banned J.A. Comment (et al.). from a review of their mutual contribs, this seems likely, but since you were at least partially involved, is there something else i should know? The user who reported him to me seems to be on a mission, and I want to make sure I'm not stepping into something I don't fully understand. If I don't hear from you in a bit, I'm confident enough that I'm going to block, but I'd love some reassurance. --barneca (talk) 23:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Meanwhile, I'm reviewing the block of User talk:J. A. Comment. Checkuser confirmed the lack of a link between J. A. Comment and Velebit, and so I'm left wondering what J. A. Comment has actually done wrong. From everything I can see, J. A. Comment is merely trying to support text in an article with sources. Nothing seems particularly POV about it, since it is mainly sourcing of already-existing text. The other editor seems to be upset and constantly insisting that all sources be online, but this is not a Wikipedia requirement. Can you explain things better? Velebit doesn't even seem to have been interested in this one article J. A. Comment is involved in... and, J. A. Comment doesn't seem to have been that familiar with Wikipedia right off the bat, although this was apparently a contributing factor. (He requested unprotection from you on his 10th edit, but it was weeks after he showed up.) Mangojuicetalk 16:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.

edit
 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 25 23 June 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Board elections completed; results forthcoming WikiWorld: "John Hodgman" 
News and notes: Military media mention, milestones Dispatches: How Wikipedia's 1.0 assessment scale has evolved 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 26 26 June 2008 About the Signpost

Ting Chen wins 2008 Board Election ArbCom's BLP "special enforcement" remedy proves controversial 
Global group discussions in progress WikiWorld: "Raining animals" 
News and notes: Foundation hires, milestones Dispatches: Reliable sources in content review processes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Imperial Triple Crown Jewels

edit
 
On behalf of Durova, I recognize AndonicO with the Imperial Triple Crown Jewels for exceptional content improvements to Wikipedia. Thank you for all you do.Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
 
Nuts to you

! Your Imperial Majesty, it gives me great pleasure to bestow these Imperial Triple Crown Jewels in recognition of your contributions to Wikipedia. May you wear them well. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

User: Pinaypinay

edit

Can you do something about user Pinaypinay (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)? This user keeps posting info about this Ruvic Rea guy in the Tayabas City article without any source or proof about the existence of this person. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 12:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

"They"

edit

Ah! Gotcha. No biggie. I'm addressing your questions on the FAC page right now.--Pericles of AthensTalk 16:48, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Archiving

edit

No problem. RedThunder 18:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

QIn dynasty

edit

Hey Andonic, just to let you know, I've created a draft of the Qin dynasty article here (though it only has a lead so far). Thanks for joing the collaboration. Nousernamesleft (talk) 23:27, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Make sure the watchlist the draft's talk page, by the way. Nousernamesleft (talk) 02:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Egyptians

edit

You protected this page over a month ago because of edit warring between and Troy07, and now that we've come to a compromise (under the "Religion, Names" section of the talk page), I think it's highly unlikely another edit war will break out. Could you please unprotect it?--Yolgnu (talk) 23:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Yolgnu, but make sure to watch the article closely, because I really hate edit warring. ~ Troy (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proofreading a Ninja

edit

Hi, I am back to inquire if you are available these few days to proofread Ninja Gaiden (2004 video game)? Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 00:44, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. Jappalang (talk) 10:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, AndonicO. The sentence "despite taking advantage of the PS3's improved hardware, the ported version was regarded as inferior to the Xbox one" is incorrect. The PS3 version was regarded by several reviewers as inferior on technical achievement, i.e. it failed to exploit the hardware as much as the Xbox version did (besides introducing new software bugs). These reviewers are also split on the final quality (overall) of the PS3 port compared to the Xbox. Could you reword the final statement? Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 01:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that is better. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 01:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

SarekOfVulcan RFA

edit
 

Thank you for !voting on my RfA. If you supported, I'll make sure your confidence is not misplaced; if you opposed, I'll take your criticism into account and try to adjust my behavior accordingly.

See you around the wiki!--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 00:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.

edit
 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 27 30 June 2008 About the Signpost

Private arbitration case criticized, vacated Other ArbCom announcements reviewed in wake of controversy 
Statistical model identifies potential RfA candidates WikiWorld: "Mike Birbiglia and the Perils of Sleepwalking" 
News and notes: Board votes released, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Sources in biology and medicine Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Independence day

edit

Just stopping by to wish you a happy Fourth of July. I'd put firework gifs and stuff, but I'm just lazy like that. bibliomaniac15 15:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

edit

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

help

edit

Could you please help me with this?

Thanks!!

--Ricardo Ramírez (talk) 06:45, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

page protection on Coptic flag

edit

Hi AndonicO -

I'm contacting you since you are the protecting admin on the Coptic flag page. I've been doing some research on long-term page protection policy (in general, not about that page in particular) and noticed that page has been fully protected since June 1.

It looks like there's been almost no discussion there since then, and also that the edit-warring was mainly IPs, so I wonder if maybe the protection is no longer needed and you might like to unprotect it, or perhaps change it to semi-protected.

I am not familiar with what led up to the protection. If you'd rather keep it protected that's fine with me. I don't edit that page, so this is not a personal request, just something that came up related to the research I've been doing.

Thanks and have a good day... --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 03:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:HAU, Status, and you!

edit

As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible) system - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 22:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The traditional rfa thank you message

edit
  Thank you for the support!
Andonic, it is my honor to report that thanks in part to your support my third request for adminship passed (80/18/2). I appreciate the trust you and the WP community have in me, and I will endeovour to put my newly acquired mop and bucket to work for the community as a whole. Yours sincerly and respectfuly, TomStar81 (Talk) 02:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.

edit
 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 28 7 July 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency 
Wikimedia releases 2008-2009 Annual Plan Defamation case against Wikimedia dismissed 
WikiWorld: "Charles Lane" News and notes: Adminbots, abuse filter, ArbCom, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, June 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi AndonicO,

I am asking for a big favours of yours. I nominated the article Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Austria) for featured list, but there were too many small grammar problems, so we decided to withdraw it, and do a peer review first. The list is complete and very well sourced. It also followed all he suggestions given in Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Belgium) (recently promoted to featured list), so in general is in a very good shape. Only the description fields for the coins are in a need of a good copy/edit. Can you please help us to get this list promoted?

Many thanks, Miguel.mateo (talk) 06:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Might I Request your pen? says David

edit

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is help the aforementioned blighter copyedit a blinkin' article in preparation for FAC. Rewards may include a barnstar and drink, payable whenever you get your ass to D.C. to claim the first one owed. :P If you're not busy, any help would be appreciated. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 12:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Ioffer

edit

Hi! I created a page called Ioffer. Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ioffer Would you mind editing it? Thanks! Neptunekh (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

User:AndonicO/Membernotice

GA review

edit

Anything else on the Billy Pierce review? I think I've covered everything you brought up. MisfitToys (talk) 00:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Note: This was left on User:AndonicO/Tzatziki Squad/Membernotice. Keilana|Parlez ici 01:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wow, why'd he send it to you? Anyways, I had passed the article already. But, thanks for the note! :) Gary King (talk) 22:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Credible author

edit

Hello. A credible authors' reference is being "overrided" by edit-warring. I recently tried to add to the telescope article but this editor seems to think that his opinion overrides a VERY credible author in Mr. Richard Powers. I've been blocked before for edit-warring recently, so I don't want this to be another incident on my record.

Anyway, the other editor seemed to have asked his friend-type editors to form a consensus, so I will do the same. The Islamic connection here is, Al-Haytham. He is FUNDAMENTAL to the telescope and the FATHER of optics. By definition, the summary can include him since the radio and electro-magnetic telescopes are derogatory to the average person looking at the article; I wanted to add it to the history section since it looked cleaner. Can you help your fellow InternetHero?? InternetHero (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

edit
 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 29 14 July 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency 
WikiWorld: "Goregrind" Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 30 21 July 2008 About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "Cartoon physics" News and notes: New Board Chair, compromised accounts 
Dispatches: History of the featured article process Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

RFA thankspam

edit

Thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed with 140 supporting, 11 opposing, and 4 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have given to me. If I can ever assist you with anything, just ask.

Cheers!

J.delanoygabsadds 19:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Don't go!

edit

What's this "semi-retired" nonsense?! Well, if you have any time, if you could help me copyedit Wipeout 3, I'd be much obliged. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 16:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, you can't leave. What kind of business is this? Enigma message 16:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Apparently, he's going to have very limited internet access due to real life reasons which I'm not sure I'm at liberty to reveal. It's really too bad. :( Nousernamesleft (talk) 20:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Internet I'll probably have... just not time. Can't be helped, sorry. :( I'll never really leave, though. · AndonicO Engage. 21:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm semi-retired too, I think. At least I got your MSN nick. I hope we can chat someday when the both of us have the time.   -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 08:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Gah! Just when we were getting good. Ah, well, people come and go. bibliomaniac15 04:23, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

edit

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks!

edit
  Thank you...

...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazimoff 21:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Media franchises

edit

Dear AndonicO...If you are still interested in participating in WikiProject Media franchises, please remove your name from the inactive participants list and add it to the active participants list. If you don't have time, but would still like to show some support, you can always add yourself to the sympathizers list. It would be wonderful to see you in the project. Have a nice day! - LA (T) 19:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello there! I'm Back!

edit

Hey man, well glad to say i'm back to editing wikipedia full-time now? Any articles you think I should participate in? Uh, its Kliu1 by the way.....i forget how to put the signature thingo at the end.....:P —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kliu1 (talkcontribs) 21:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to delete

edit

Hey, thanks for the speedy page-protection at the telscope(s) articles. I was trying to do things "officially". InternetHero (talk) 16:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I think a general consensus has been formed on the telescope articles. If you look here, you'll see theres only about two users against the addition. Another user has joined our consensus, so that makes about 9 to 5 (3 of which aren't taking part in the discussion---so maybe 2 :-). I found a GF over the weekend!! Cheers. InternetHero (talk) 17:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Far Cry (film)

edit

At Talk:Far Cry (film), the anonymous editor has vandalized yet again with a different IP in the 91.108.xx.xx range. I've issued a final warning. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 15:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.

edit

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 31 28 July 2008 About the Signpost

Wikimania 2008 wrap-up WikiWorld: "Terry Gross" 
News and notes: Unblocked in China Dispatches: Find reliable sources online 
WikiProject Report: Military history Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 32 9 August 2008 About the Signpost

Anthrax suspect reportedly edit-warred on Wikipedia WikiWorld: "Fall Out Boy" 
Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, July WikiProject Report: WikiProject New York State routes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 33 11 August 2008 About the Signpost

Study: Wikipedia's growth may indicate unlimited potential Board of Trustees fills Nominating Committee for new members 
Greenspun illustration project moves to first phase WikiWorld: "George Stroumboulopoulos" 
News and notes: Wikipedian dies Dispatches: Reviewing free images 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 34 18 August 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Help wanted 
WikiWorld: "Cashew" Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Egyptians

edit

Hello AndonicO. I hope you are doing well. I had made some changes to the article Egyptians a few days and restored many of its contens that were removed by User:Dbachmann. This same user has been engaging in a war edit over this content in spite of many warnings to him. He seems to be engaged in edits that are not approved by any of the users contributing to the article. Please take a look at the article, and consider to take the necessary measures taken by Wikipedia in such circumstances. Thank you; --Lanternix (talk) 20:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Protection Template?

edit

Would it be alright to place {{pp-semi-vandalism}} on the protected Visored page since you protected it due to vandalism? I thought that this would make it easier for people to find out why they couldn't edit the page. --Skunkboy74 (talk) 00:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I'm sorry to make you do that. I was going to, but I always worry that I'm going to do something I'm not supposed to. --Skunkboy74 (talk) 01:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply