140 sites?

edit

I'd like to see a reference to confirm that isn't a typo Gacole (talk) 02:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The corporate overview link in the reference list leads to a page which confirms those numbers Kotukunui (talk) 03:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't even include a logo of AsureQuality

edit

Hi, There! wondering why It doesn't even include a logo of AsureQuality. can someone please add its logo! It doesn't even include a logo of AsureQuality http://www.asurequality.com/app/templates/default/images/AsureQuality-Logo.png

Company logos are copyrighted to the companies, and Wikipedia prefers to show free content. We do show some company logo making a case under the "fair use" provisions of US law for an exemption from copyright. This is extra work for us, so usually we don't bother except for very major corporations with very well known logos.-gadfium 19:14, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Added logo and new citations for the topics to the best of my knowledge. New to the wiki as a contributor so apologises for the mistakes in advance.
Vikasanandaclick (talk) 06:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
The logo you added seems fine. It's certainly OK as {{Non-free logo}}, but might even be simple enough to be within the public domain per c:COM:New Zealand. The text content, however, that you've been adding might be a bit iffy; the idea is to look for sources like the ones described here that cover the company and provide critical commentary about the company that aren't really generated by the company. Sometimes a WP:PRIMARY source can be used, but the article is not really intended to be a Wikipedia version of the company's official website or a Wikipedia brochure for the company. Lots of the content you've added seems a bit WP:PROMOTIONAL and it might be better to trim some of it out; in other words, addition by subtraction. Finally, your account is quite new and one of the first things you started doing was asking about this article or editing this article. In fact, your entire focus has been this article. Are you connected to the company in any way? If you are, please take the time to carefully read through Wikipedia:Conflict of interest so that you gain a better grasp of the kinds of things Wikipedia expects from editors who edit articles about subjects they're connected to. I'm not saying you're committed some grave offense by editing the article, but an WP:APPARENTCOI can sometimes create problems with other editors; so, you might want to try and understand why that sometimes happens. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AsureQuality Limited. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply