 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section a7 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request on the basis that: Multiple obvious claims of significance here, including those mentioned below. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits. Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely. |
DES (talk) 19:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
The publisher was the most notable publisher of a reference book on artists, one which is cited in many Wikipedia articles. It has a French Wikipedia page, and is well covered by many sources. The nominator appears to have arrived here as a result of an AfD unrelated to this publisher entirely. Collect (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (note the slew of deletion discussions started by one person -- and his !votes on the deletions. Note also the SPI [1] which means I am not giving him as much good faith as perhaps I ought - or I gave him more than I ought in the past. --Collect (talk) 18:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)