Kaciemonster

Joined 25 September 2014

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Protonk (talk | contribs) at 16:18, 29 November 2014 (Your Gamergate draft: the best place for feedback on a user draft). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 9 years ago by Protonk in topic Your Gamergate draft

OMG you deleted my favorite movie ever. Protonk (talk) 23:42, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:00, Friday, November 15, 2024 (UTC)


Lotso Huggin Badges

Holy crap that's a lot of badge thingies on your user page. Protonk (talk) 22:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hitachi Magic Wand

Thanks again for taking on the review! I've responded, at Talk:Hitachi Magic Wand/GA1. — Cirt (talk) 12:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Okay, all now addressed/responded at Talk:Hitachi Magic Wand/GA1. :) — Cirt (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. Dreadstar 04:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please review Hitachi Magic Wand

Notifying you as you were the GA Reviewer, no obligations or expectations. :)

As part of a Quality improvement project, I've recently put the article Hitachi Magic Wand up for Peer Review.

Participation would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Hitachi Magic Wand/archive1. — Cirt (talk) 06:18, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your Gamergate draft

User:Halfhat recently mentioned your Gamergate userspace draft. I just wanted to remind you that WP:BLP applies everywhere on Wikipedia, including in userspace. Your version makes several BLP claims cited to self-published and unreliable sources which I would strongly suggest removing. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • I have questions. What, specifically violates BLP in this draft and which sources would you recommend removing (I'd also appreciate an explanation as to why). Thanks. Protonk (talk) 15:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Hi User:Woodroar, seconding Protonk's question. I appreciate your feedback, but you haven't presented me with any actionable changes that I can make to my draft. You referred to several BLP claims that I made, and I would love to change them, but you didn't tell me what they are. Telling me my draft is terrible without making suggestions on how to improve it isn't really helpful. Kaciemonster (talk) 16:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply