Kaciemonster
|
|
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juliette Gordon Low, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James E. West. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you!
editI'm glad you enjoyed it! I've had fun writing it too, though initially it was a bugger to get off the ground, thanks to Wikipedia's paranoia about internet culture. Serendipodous 08:32, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
GA review for Taman Shud Case
editHi, I've looked over most of what you've done so far and I've left a few messages. --Anarchyte 02:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Kim Kardashian: Hollywood
edit | On 13 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kim Kardashian: Hollywood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that within five months of its release, Kim Kardashian: Hollywood had been played 5.7 billion minutes, or over 10,000 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kim Kardashian: Hollywood. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Kaciemonster. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of courtesy
editOut of courtesy I thought I'd let you know I undid your edit to the chernobyl accident page. I wrote the section, so may be a tad biased, but from what I've read, the issue of the number of abortions after the accident, is treated with far more notability by the medical community and apparently even the IAEA themselves, that I think it clearly necessitates that any scholarly discussion on the accident should have the "mutation worries->abortion requests" dimension to the accident, to receive its fair dues, specifically that is, to place the information closer to the top of the article, and not to bury it way down in the page, where the page is interspered with terribly researched claptrap and therefore again, it does not belong.
If you disagree, I'd be more than willing to be persuaded on the talk page of the article if you feel you have a good reason for the move, that your edit resulted in?
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Kaciemonster. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Slender Man
editSlender Man has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~ A412 talk! 16:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)