Eleni Stefanou
I am an archaeologist - museologist currently working at the Hellenic Open University where I teach the module Aspects of Cultural Phenomena in the MSc course of Cultural Organisations Management.
My research interests evolve around the ideological uses of the past in the present, as these are shaped through museum and heritage representations, memory practices, cultural tourism and education, i.e. the predominant fields that shape the intimate relationship of various social groups with the past.
From 2008 until 2013 I was teaching Museum Studies and Museum Education as an Adjunct Lecturer at the Department of Pre-School Education and the Educational Design, University of the Aegean, Rhodes, Greece.
I hold a BA degree in Archaeology (2002) from the Department of History and Archaeology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
I obtained my MA degree on Maritime Archaeology (2003) from the Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, UK, and my master thesis explores the relationship of Greek maritime museums and national identity in modern Greece.
I conducted a PhD (2008) at the Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, UK, under the supervision of Professor Yannis Hamilakis, funded by the Foundation of State Scholarships (IKY).
My PhD Thesis is entitled Aspects of Identity and Nationhood: Commemorating, Representing, and Replicating the Greek Maritime Past. It investigates the ideological parameters which govern the Greek maritime heritage representations in connection to the underpinning of narratives about modern Greek national identity, as these are shaped through a series of representation and memorialisation practices, namely maritime museum displays, ancient ship reconstructions, naval commemorative ceremonies, and naval-battle re-enactments. Issues of agency, such as the production of national maritime narratives by private agents, the role of Orthodox religion in maritime heritage representations, and the interaction of the local and the national within Greek maritime communities, are vital for the contextual approach of the interaction of nationalism with the uses of the material past.
Supervisors: Professor Y. Hamilakis
My research interests evolve around the ideological uses of the past in the present, as these are shaped through museum and heritage representations, memory practices, cultural tourism and education, i.e. the predominant fields that shape the intimate relationship of various social groups with the past.
From 2008 until 2013 I was teaching Museum Studies and Museum Education as an Adjunct Lecturer at the Department of Pre-School Education and the Educational Design, University of the Aegean, Rhodes, Greece.
I hold a BA degree in Archaeology (2002) from the Department of History and Archaeology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
I obtained my MA degree on Maritime Archaeology (2003) from the Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, UK, and my master thesis explores the relationship of Greek maritime museums and national identity in modern Greece.
I conducted a PhD (2008) at the Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, UK, under the supervision of Professor Yannis Hamilakis, funded by the Foundation of State Scholarships (IKY).
My PhD Thesis is entitled Aspects of Identity and Nationhood: Commemorating, Representing, and Replicating the Greek Maritime Past. It investigates the ideological parameters which govern the Greek maritime heritage representations in connection to the underpinning of narratives about modern Greek national identity, as these are shaped through a series of representation and memorialisation practices, namely maritime museum displays, ancient ship reconstructions, naval commemorative ceremonies, and naval-battle re-enactments. Issues of agency, such as the production of national maritime narratives by private agents, the role of Orthodox religion in maritime heritage representations, and the interaction of the local and the national within Greek maritime communities, are vital for the contextual approach of the interaction of nationalism with the uses of the material past.
Supervisors: Professor Y. Hamilakis
less
InterestsView All (21)
Uploads
Papers by Eleni Stefanou
The biography of the material past constitutes a challenging pursuit amongst those who study it. This venture is further complicated when ancient materiality is entangled with recent and difficult life-events, raw experiences, first-hand memories. Such is the case of the Eptapyrgio of Thessaloniki (Yedi Kule), a Byzantine fort, former prison (1890-1989) and at present, a UNESCO monument, the Ephorate of Antiquities of Thessaloniki City and a visited archaeological site. In the context of a politically aware archaeology and archaeological ethnography (2013-2017) with former political prisoners of Eptapyrgio (from the Junta period between 1967-1974), this paper throws light upon the interpretative and representational gap regarding the recent and difficult past of this ancient monument. It attempts to contextualise archaeological practice, while exploring its ideological and epistemological grounds, as well as the social connotations that link to it. This allows the discussion to go beyond the confines of local idiosyncrasy, as it widens the meaning of the past and it problematizes the larger issue of the politics of the past and the complexity of cultural representation.
The 2017 field school research topic was material culture, and what its use and distribution can reveal about local practices, traditions, beliefs and gender roles. This paper presents the processes and results of this season as experienced by its participants. Below is an account by the four international students in archaeology, anthropology and heritage management who, under the guidance of a small team of professionals, received training in archaeological ethnography whilst residing in Gonies and undertaking month-long fieldwork research through direct engagement with the local population. The outcome of the 2017 season was a small exhibition -located within the village but advertised throughout the region and in the city of Heraklion- of objects
which the team and its interlocutors together selected as most expressive of life past and present in the village of Gonies.
ρόλος του στη σύγχρονη κοινωνία και πώς αυτός αναδεικνύεται
μέσω των μουσείων; Τι έχει να πει το παρελθόν στο σήμερα και
ποια η σημασία της πολιτιστικής κληρονομιάς; Πώς τα ελληνικά
μουσεία διαχειρίζονται το παρελθόν; Τα ερωτήματα αυτά δεν
είναι καινούρια. Η διαμόρφωση της σχέσης μουσείου και παρελθόντος, η άρρηκτη σύνδεση της σχέσης αυτής με ζητήματα
ταυτότητας, οι διαδικασίες μέσω των οποίων προβαίνει το μουσείο στην ερμηνεία και τη νοηματοδότηση του υλικού πολιτισμού, καθώς και η πρόσληψη των μηνυμάτων του μουσείου για
το παρελθόν από το κοινό είναι ζητήματα που έχουν αποτελέσει αντικείμενο έρευνας τόσο στη διεθνή όσο και στην ελληνική βιβλιογραφία (βλ. ενδεικτικά Vergo 1989· Kavanagh 1996·
Μπούνια και Γκαζή 2012· Χουρμουζιάδη 2006).
Η καινοτομία της ενότητας αυτής έγκειται στο γεγονός ότι
τα παραπάνω, καίρια για την αρχαιολογική και τη μουσειολογική πρακτική ερωτήματα επιχειρείται να απαντηθούν μέσα από
την προσωπική, ματιά τριών πρώην διευθυντών σημαντικών ελληνικών μουσείων. Ο Νικόλαος Καλτσάς (Εθνικό Αρχαιολογικό Μουσείο), η Αναστασία Τούρτα (Μουσείο Βυζαντινού Πολιτισμού Θεσσαλονίκης) και ο Άγγελος Δεληβορριάς (Μουσείο
Μπενάκη) προβαίνουν σε τρεις προσωπικές προσεγγίσεις, καταθέσεις εκ βαθέων της εμπειρίας που αποκτήθηκε μέσω της
μακρόχρονης πορείας στον τομέα της διοίκησης μουσείων και
διαχείρισης συλλογών. Τα κείμενα των τριών συγγραφέων σκιαγραφούν την αναμέτρησή τους με το παρελθόν, τις καινοτομίες
που εφάρμοσαν στην προβολή του, καθώς και τις δυσκολίες και
τις προκλήσεις αυτού του εγχειρήματος. Παράλληλα αναδεικνύουν τις πολλαπλές και συχνά αντικρουόμενες προσεγγίσεις
που επικρατούν στη νοηματοδότηση του παρελθόντος, στη λήψη αποφάσεων και στη συγκρότηση των ερμηνειών του υλικού πολιτισμού.
This rhetoric is successfully manifested in Salamineia, the commemorative ceremony organized annually, on the last weekend of September, in celebration of the Naval Battle of Salamis (480BC), which is considered as one of the most significant historical events of classical antiquity. The dual role attributed to the sea, as an actual and a symbolic historical locus, brings forward a perennial, deterministic and biological interpretation of history (“the sea existing in the blood of Greeks”), religious and political syncretism, the urge for the revival of the 19th century Philhellenism, polarized local, national and transnational discourses, and universal ideas that portray Greece as the stakeholder of global values, such as democracy, moral ideals and liberal thought, thus as the founder of western culture.
The biography of the material past constitutes a challenging pursuit amongst those who study it. This venture is further complicated when ancient materiality is entangled with recent and difficult life-events, raw experiences, first-hand memories. Such is the case of the Eptapyrgio of Thessaloniki (Yedi Kule), a Byzantine fort, former prison (1890-1989) and at present, a UNESCO monument, the Ephorate of Antiquities of Thessaloniki City and a visited archaeological site. In the context of a politically aware archaeology and archaeological ethnography (2013-2017) with former political prisoners of Eptapyrgio (from the Junta period between 1967-1974), this paper throws light upon the interpretative and representational gap regarding the recent and difficult past of this ancient monument. It attempts to contextualise archaeological practice, while exploring its ideological and epistemological grounds, as well as the social connotations that link to it. This allows the discussion to go beyond the confines of local idiosyncrasy, as it widens the meaning of the past and it problematizes the larger issue of the politics of the past and the complexity of cultural representation.
The 2017 field school research topic was material culture, and what its use and distribution can reveal about local practices, traditions, beliefs and gender roles. This paper presents the processes and results of this season as experienced by its participants. Below is an account by the four international students in archaeology, anthropology and heritage management who, under the guidance of a small team of professionals, received training in archaeological ethnography whilst residing in Gonies and undertaking month-long fieldwork research through direct engagement with the local population. The outcome of the 2017 season was a small exhibition -located within the village but advertised throughout the region and in the city of Heraklion- of objects
which the team and its interlocutors together selected as most expressive of life past and present in the village of Gonies.
ρόλος του στη σύγχρονη κοινωνία και πώς αυτός αναδεικνύεται
μέσω των μουσείων; Τι έχει να πει το παρελθόν στο σήμερα και
ποια η σημασία της πολιτιστικής κληρονομιάς; Πώς τα ελληνικά
μουσεία διαχειρίζονται το παρελθόν; Τα ερωτήματα αυτά δεν
είναι καινούρια. Η διαμόρφωση της σχέσης μουσείου και παρελθόντος, η άρρηκτη σύνδεση της σχέσης αυτής με ζητήματα
ταυτότητας, οι διαδικασίες μέσω των οποίων προβαίνει το μουσείο στην ερμηνεία και τη νοηματοδότηση του υλικού πολιτισμού, καθώς και η πρόσληψη των μηνυμάτων του μουσείου για
το παρελθόν από το κοινό είναι ζητήματα που έχουν αποτελέσει αντικείμενο έρευνας τόσο στη διεθνή όσο και στην ελληνική βιβλιογραφία (βλ. ενδεικτικά Vergo 1989· Kavanagh 1996·
Μπούνια και Γκαζή 2012· Χουρμουζιάδη 2006).
Η καινοτομία της ενότητας αυτής έγκειται στο γεγονός ότι
τα παραπάνω, καίρια για την αρχαιολογική και τη μουσειολογική πρακτική ερωτήματα επιχειρείται να απαντηθούν μέσα από
την προσωπική, ματιά τριών πρώην διευθυντών σημαντικών ελληνικών μουσείων. Ο Νικόλαος Καλτσάς (Εθνικό Αρχαιολογικό Μουσείο), η Αναστασία Τούρτα (Μουσείο Βυζαντινού Πολιτισμού Θεσσαλονίκης) και ο Άγγελος Δεληβορριάς (Μουσείο
Μπενάκη) προβαίνουν σε τρεις προσωπικές προσεγγίσεις, καταθέσεις εκ βαθέων της εμπειρίας που αποκτήθηκε μέσω της
μακρόχρονης πορείας στον τομέα της διοίκησης μουσείων και
διαχείρισης συλλογών. Τα κείμενα των τριών συγγραφέων σκιαγραφούν την αναμέτρησή τους με το παρελθόν, τις καινοτομίες
που εφάρμοσαν στην προβολή του, καθώς και τις δυσκολίες και
τις προκλήσεις αυτού του εγχειρήματος. Παράλληλα αναδεικνύουν τις πολλαπλές και συχνά αντικρουόμενες προσεγγίσεις
που επικρατούν στη νοηματοδότηση του παρελθόντος, στη λήψη αποφάσεων και στη συγκρότηση των ερμηνειών του υλικού πολιτισμού.
This rhetoric is successfully manifested in Salamineia, the commemorative ceremony organized annually, on the last weekend of September, in celebration of the Naval Battle of Salamis (480BC), which is considered as one of the most significant historical events of classical antiquity. The dual role attributed to the sea, as an actual and a symbolic historical locus, brings forward a perennial, deterministic and biological interpretation of history (“the sea existing in the blood of Greeks”), religious and political syncretism, the urge for the revival of the 19th century Philhellenism, polarized local, national and transnational discourses, and universal ideas that portray Greece as the stakeholder of global values, such as democracy, moral ideals and liberal thought, thus as the founder of western culture.
This volume presents the theoretical and local contexts for the project, explains the methodology and the project outcomes, and reviews in detail some of the public archaeology actions with the community as examples of collaborative, research-based heritage management. What the authors emphasize in this book is the value of local context in designing and implementing public archaeology projects, and the necessity of establishing methods to understand, collaborate and interact with culturally specific groups and publics. They argue for the implementation of archaeological ethnographic research as a method of creating instances and spaces for collaborative knowledge production. The volume contributes to a greater understanding of how rural communities can be successfully engaged in the management of their own heritage.
It will be relevant to archaeologists and other heritage professionals who aim to maximise the inclusivity and impact of small projects with minimal resources and achieve sustainable processes of collaboration with local stakeholders.
The field of so-called ‘fringe’ or ‘alternative’ archaeology is vast and multifaceted, ranging from pseudoarchaeology, ‘bad’ archaeology practices, conspiracy theories and claims about lost civilizations to extraterrestrial cultures, (neo)shamanism, religious and/or nationalist demands. All these agendas have in common the fact that, through their differentiated readings and appropriations of the past, they create solidarities amongst their supporters.
Contents: From archaeology to archaeologies: themes, challenges and borders of the ‘other’ past (Anna Simandiraki-Grimshaw, Eleni Stefanou); 2) An insider‘s view of an alternative archaeology (Michael Cremo); 3) Performance, participation and pyramids: addressing meaning and method behind alternative archaeology in Visoko, Bosnia (Tera Pruitt); 4) Marginal and mainstream. Religion, politics and identity in the contemporary us, as seen through the lens of the Kennewick Man / The Ancient One (Liv Nilsson Stutz); 5) A clash of ideologies: Zimbabwean archaeology at the fringe (Paul Hubbard, Robert S. Burrett); 6) Academic constructs about the past and early education as (dis)entangled components of identity formation processes (Anna Zalewska); 7) Archaeology as allegory: the representations of archaeology in children’s literature in Brazil (Marcia Bezerra); 8) A look in the mirror and the perspective of others on the portrayal of archaeology in the mass media (Diane Scherlzler); 9) ‘Looting’ unveiled, archaeology revealed: case studies from western Greece (Ioanna Antoniadou); 10) Visual collision? prehistoric rock art and graffiti in an Armenian landscape (Fay Stevens); 11) The colours of the past (Cornelius Holtorf).
Στο πρώτο μέρος επιχειρείται μία σύντομη θεωρητική προσέγγιση του πεδίου της Μουσειοπαιδαγωγικής, καθώς και η ανάλυση βασικών όρων που αφορούν στο γνωστικό αντικείμενο.
Στο δεύτερο μέρος συζητούνται βασικές παιδαγωγικές θεωρίες, απαραίτητες στη διαδικασία σχεδιασμού εκπαιδευτικών προγραμμάτων, που αφορούν στη σύνδεση μουσείου-σχολείου και παιχνιδιού-μάθησης.
Το τρίτο μέρος επικεντρώνεται στη μεθοδολογία σχεδιασμού, στη στοχοθεσία, και στα συνήθη λάθη που γίνονται κατά τη διαδικασία ορισμού των στόχων ενός εκπαιδευτικού προγράμματος.
Το τέταρτο μέρος συζητά βασικές κατηγορίες πιθανού κοινού επισκεπτών με βάση τον ηλικιακό διαχωρισμό αλλά και τις ανάγκες τις κάθε ομάδας.
Η θεωρητική προσέγγιση θα συμπληρωθεί με πρακτικές ασκήσεις. Στους συμμετέχοντες θα δοθεί σχετική βιβλιογραφία, ελληνόγλωσση και ξενόγλωσση, καθώς και διαδικτυακοί τόποι με μουσειακό εκπαιδευτικό υλικό."
This paper will illustrate aspects of the public interpretation and reception of the 1920s and 1930s architectural heritage of the Fascist Italian regime within the urban landscape of the city of Rhodes.
Firstly, the results of ethnographic research conducted during the period 2012-2013 will be presented regarding the public perceptions of the buildings of the Fascist Administration, which are either viewed based on their current use (mostly administrative buildings), or as “undesired heritage”, or, deceptively based on appearance, as medieval.
Secondly, an application of public heritage education will be presented based on an audience-based perspective, with a particular focus on adult groups with kids. The aim is to encourage an engaging experience of local history through cultural walks and heritage trails designed around the architectural heritage of the Fascist Regime within the urban context of Rhodes. Urban landscape is understood as a “living museum” that facilitates a model of in situ informal education which stems from a holistic view of the place: by taking into account not only historical and literary sources but also current perceptions and oral narratives gathered with ethnographic research methods, flexible cultural itineraries are designed so that adult groups with kids can engage with the place’s past and present through discovery, educational and hands-on activities.
Αυτές και άλλες πολλές ερωτήσεις – εξαιρετικά ενδιαφέρουσες για μια πόλη παγκόσμιας κληρονομιάς όπως η Ρόδος – θα εξεταστούν στην ομιλία.
In this workshop on community engagement in archaeological heritage management individual colleagues and/or initiatives from all over Europe that do community engagement in Europe and beyond meet to discuss methods, limitations, prospects, and plan for the future.
In round tables participants will be divided into different working groups and with the guidance of the moderators they will engage in an organised discussion about (a) methods applied, (b) best practices implemented (c) selection of audiences, (d) non-participants and reasons for not getting involved, (e) power dynamics and issues of conflict, (f) common values emerging from community engagement heritage projects, (g) goals, objectives and future steps to be taken.
The purpose of this closed interactive workshop is to formulate a series of proposals for the development of a manual of best practices and methodologies for organizing actions to engage and activate local communities in archaeology and cultural heritage. Please note that this is not a workshop based on paper presentations, but an interactive one based on case studies and experience from the field.
To apply, please send us a short description (up to 250 words) of the project you are working on by 15 February 2024. If your application is successful, you will be notified by the end of February 2024.
Once selected, you will need to register at www.e-a-a.org to secure your participation.
The 2017 field school research topic was material culture, and what its use and distribution can reveal about local practices, traditions, beliefs and gender roles. This paper presents the processes and results of this season as experienced by its participants. Below is an account by the four international students in archaeology, anthropology and heritage management who, under the guidance of a small team of professionals, received training in archaeological ethnography whilst residing in Gonies and undertaking month-long fieldwork research through direct engagement with the local population. The outcome of the 2017 season was a small exhibition - located within the village but advertised throughout the region and in the city of Heraklion - of objects which the team and its interlocutors together selected as most expressive of life past and present in the village of Gonies.