according to you right

at least according to me

light acts as a wave and then it decides to act like a particle. make up your damn mind

emphasis on "at least"

smh

for now, muhahaha

wait

as a flat earther do you believe at all in subatomic particles? @Umwhat

I don't think Einstein liked the idea of the vacuum being able to polarize

or particles at all?

i mean <:happy:507991686320750592>

oh sorry... earf flad

quantum mechanics and astrophysics cross over a lot

if you reject one you're likely to reject the other

i reject all science including the real stuff

I don't reject quantum mechanics. I just don't agree with some of the interpretations.

lmao

why would you reject all science?

let me clarify, I don't agree with some interpretations *that people make* about quantum mechanics

i don't was just joke

o

i see

yeah...

like the science that the earth measures flat!

interpretations or theories? 🤔

well

according to science its pretty curvy

just take up a curve calculator

take into account atmospheric refraction

and take some pictures

EZ

id rather not go into it as i gotta peace out

in 321 bye

The data says that when you let go of an apple, it falls, light bends around massive bodies, and galaxies far away are red shifted. All that, I agree with. That is the data. What I don't always agree with is how the data is interpreted.

can you give an example?

I don't believe that it all happens because of what Einstein called "Geodesics"

space is flat

that's my interpretation

Ok wait

Space flat?

huh, I thought flat space was already accepted by most scientists