User talk:Túrelio/Archive16

Talkpage archive from 2021

Necacar5277's contributions

Hello, happy holidays! You've blocked Necacar5277 (talk · contribs) in the past because of overwriting existing images. He started again with it, + now he uploads copyvio images as own work. Could you warn him again and delete revisions? Best regards, Kizule (talk) 12:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

A favor

Hello. It's me again. Could you please process this deletion request as soon as possible? It is for an image I uploaded but now regret ever having done so. I would really appreciate your assistance. StellarHalo (talk) 14:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification

Hello. I would like to notify you about this subject as you have shown in the past an interest in it. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 04:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Requesting support

New year greetings,

Earlier in Octo.2020 @ village pump Copyright received your positive response for assistance in uploading old images from a research paper in PDF but the web link did not open then.

Now I find a new PDF link @ academia.edu

Subsequently after some wait resource request @ Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange got positive response that 2 images are already on commons and with assistance is now needed in uploading 4 images according to following info.:

Page number and image numbers in bracket: 244(8.2), 252(8.3), 254(8.4), 259(8.6) of new PDF link @ academia.edu ( For article en:Superstitions in Muslim societies )

8.2: Better image here

8.3: Better image here

8.4: Better image here (on the dropdown at the top of the image viewer, select "f. 38 b")

8.6: Better images here

8.2, 8.3, 8.4 are certainly out of copyright, as understood by Commons policy; they're either super-old two-dimensional works,... 8.6 consists of photos (of a three-dimensional work) over which the Smithsonian claims copyright, and so may still be copyrighted (need to be confirmed for copyright status).

I do not find myself technically competent to complete activity on my own hence Requesting your kind assistance in above respect.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bookku,

I will look into that, but it may take some time. --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Greetings, I hope I am not making request too early again. It's not that it is too urgent, and you can take your time, but it is quite likely that I might forget myself over a period of time. Since I was visiting commons thought it's better to drop in a message.

Thanks for your support and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 10:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Garfeld12

Hello, Túrelio. I wanted to ask you if you can check the uploads of Special:Contributions/Garfeld12. He has been uploading many images, and in several I have suspicions that the licenses he adds are fake, but I do not have enough experience to determine it reliably. It is also a suspected block evasion account on the Spanish Wikipedia, a matter that is pending to be determined. Best regards. --Vareloco (talk) 03:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Temporary undeletion

Hi, can you temporarily undelete File:Viaducto Las Polvorillas.jpg so that I could check if it's a deletion in error? It might be the same case as File:Cataratas Foz de Iguazú.jpg where there are indeed matches in Google Images, but aren't really exact matches. Thanks, pandakekok9 03:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi @pandakekok9,  Done. Totally different from the linked image. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

But indeed, I do not find any valid Google-hit for it. The available Google-hits are for a different photo from the same point[3][4]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Turelio. In that case, should I convert the speedy into a DR or just remove the tag completely? pandakekok9 08:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Turelio, can you also check File:Luna Llena de Cerca.jpg as well? Thanks, pandakekok9 04:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

User:PMRMaeyaert

Hi, Túrelio. I see you have contacted PMRMaeyaert concerning duplicates. It appears there are many duplicates and yet he keeps uploading today almost non-stop. I became aware of that, because my attention was drawn to another problem with PMRMaeyaert's older uploads. While he accuses other people of messing with some 15.000 of his uploads from around 2011, the fact is that he himself has uploaded files, described them on the file page as well as in the file name, only to then overwrite the file with an image with another subject. See f.i. the file history of File:27439 Oudenaarde Eine Sint-Eligiuskerk 21.jpg and others in that sequence. Yet he blames others and apparently now he is giving other people work with duplicates also, while not even bothering to answer my concerns and only bragging about the quality of his pictures and the size of his archive etc. Since you are a sysop, wouldn't you think it might be warranted to instant block PMRMaeyaert, because he is giving other people quite some trouble now, and it might be good if he calmed down and review his own work. Or do I have to go to ANU? Greeting, Eissink (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

I see you are not active the recent hours, so I will go to ANU. Eissink (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

Clearing the temporary category

Hi. You deleted Category:WLM/6900001593 by my request, it`s OK.
But 4 files below remain tagged with this category, could you remove it from them too?

• 
• 
• 
• 

Thank you. - Gerarus (talk) 10:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I tried this already before deleting the cat. But these images have no regular entry for this cat. I assume the link is coded in the WLM-template, which should probably not be removed. --Túrelio (talk) 11:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I guess I needed to rename this temporary category first, and then create it under a normal name.
I'll try to go that way next time. - Gerarus (talk) 13:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

OTRS and license laundering

Hey, as I don't have access to OTRS tickets, can you confirm than the OTRS permission of this file mentions a photographer and proves that it has been released under CC-BY-SA-4.0?

Because the uploader uploaded this file (and a bunch more) multiple times this summer, claiming to be the creator. He then uploaded them to Flickr to be able to upload them here with license laundering. If you look closely at the source, the Flickr file includes a Commons template (an OTRS Commons template!), indicating that the Flickr user copy-pasted the file description from Commons.

So if the OTRS permission clearly identifies the creator and gives a permission to publish the file under CC-BY-SA-4.0, I presume everything is fine. If the OTRS permission simply refers to Flickr, then we still have a problem. Thanks, Gyrostat (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I too don't have access to OTRS, I just trust their judgement in general. Anyway, you will find the OTRS-volunteer, who added the final ticket in the edit-history of the file. --Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Ich bräuchte da mal einen Rat...

Hallo Túrelio,

ich bin heute [5] darauf gestoßen. Was mache ich am schlausten in diesem Fall? Einiges habe ich schon getagged oder zur Löschung vorgeschlagen. Die letzten beiden Uploads von heute sind jetzt als eigene Werke deklariert, stammen aber in Wahrheit von da. Der Rest stammt, mitsamt Quellenangabe, von irgendwo. Freie Lizenzen sind für mich nicht erkennbar. Das Time-Magazin stammt von einem fandom, das zwar eine brauchbare CC-Lizenz ausweist, aber mit Sicherheit auch keine Rechte daran hat. Die historischen Fotos sind zwar irgendwie alt, abe rmeist ist der Autor unbekannt, genauso wie die Rechtslage.

Danke Dir für einen Rat und viele Grüße, --Druschba 4 (talk) 11:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Druschba 4,

puh, russ./sowjet. Copyright ist ähnlich kompliziert wie US-copyright. Generell ist es bei Fotos, bei denen man das Bauchgefühl hat, es könnte vielleicht doch PD sein, das beste einen regulären LA zu stellen (also kein speedy), weil dieser keinen Zeitdruck hat und den Input von Dritten erleichtert. Eine Benutzerin, die sich sehr gut mit russ./sowjet. Copyright auskennt, ist User:PlanespotterA320. Versuch mal, sie dafür zu gewinnen, zumindest für die histor. Fotos. Für die beiden Karten habe ich auf Basis deiner Quelle eine LA gestellt. Mal sehen, ob der Hochlader reagiert. --Túrelio (talk) 13:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Danke Dir soweit. Ich schaue mal, was die nächsten Tage ergeben und meld emich ggf. wieder. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 05:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Why did you even delete one of my pages?

Well, you deleted my request once on the help desk for operating a bot, stop deleting or i mute you. Patrick901, January 6th 2021 at 9:01 A.M Eastern Standard Time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick901 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Another threat like above and your account on Commons might meet the same fate as on :en. Your request Commons:Bots/Requests/Patrick901 has been deleted already 3 days ago, as it was tagged for speedy deletion due to being obviously vandalism. --Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Young Farmers Solidarity Protest Slogan HK.jpg

Hello. I don't edit much on Wikimedia Commons - why was this file deleted exactly? I messaged the author of the work and asked for his explicit permission to release the image into the public domain. How exactly are you able to determine whether an image doesn't meet a license requirement? I explicitly included the name of the author and added a free domain tag. The deletion of this image feels more like it was an assumption of bad faith on your part, not of legitimate concern. I apologize if I'm coming off as a bit indignant - can you tell me what I was supposed to do instead while uploading this image? User: Esmost ^talk 21:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

In general, media on Twitter are not free and, without a positive confirmation, you cannot be sure that the poster is also the author - same problem as on Facebook and alike. When uploading media to Commons, which are not your own work, you need to provide verifiable evidence that they were released by the legitimate copyright-holder under a Commons-compliant (COM:L) license. In cases where the license is not reliably published on the source-site, a confirmation of authorship and of the free license needs to be sent directly from the rightsholder to OTRS ([email protected]), see Commons:OTRS#If_you_are_NOT_the_copyright_holder for details. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Simone

Hi, I´ve just uploaded my own work, my picture is authorized for Simone´s article. Can you please upload it? I am the prefessional photographer who has authorized it. Formiguinhas (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)~

By the way, why did you delete it, if I did authorize it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Formiguinhas (talk • contribs)

Hi Formiguinhas, when discussing a deletion, you should provide the name of the file you are talking about. I've performed more than 500 deletions today. Likely you are talking about File:Cigarra20192020.jpg, which even hasn't "Simone" in the filename.

Now to your question: this image was found to be pre-published at https://fotografia.folha.uol.com.br/galerias/1666153644601066-imagens-da-cantora-simone in higher resolution and uncropped compared to your upload. Also your upload had no metadata. All these factors are a strong suggestion that your upload was taken from this source. You were told of this problem already on your talkpage. If you want to contest this decision, you need to open a "undeletion request"; the link to that was provided on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Portada de Aquí están los Montesinos.jpg

Hi. I've realized that I should not have uploaded that image. Can you, please, mark it for deletion. Thanks. --Chalisimo5 (talk) 02:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much!

Good evening, I kindly ask you if you can remove other personal files from Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavmi (talk • contribs) 16:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks!

No it absolutely does not belong to me that file. You didn't discuss it with me. I took care of several graphic replacements, as you were very kind in removing my old files within the morning. Can I leave you other low-quality files to remove? Flavmi (talk) 16:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Maps from Istorijski atlas oslobodilačkog rata naroda Jugoslavije

G'day Túrelio, I see you have been deleting images of maps from the above book, stating in the edit summary "It's not PD. It's not any kind of official documents. It is a illustration from historic book". I do not understand the logic behind this edit summary. The book in which it was published IS an official historical work of the Yugoslav government, it was published by the Historical Institute of the Yugoslav National Army. The map is a work of applied art, for which the copyright term in Yugoslavia was 25 years. It therefore became PD-Yugoslavia in 1978. In terms of the US licence, the book was only published in Yugoslavia, so it meets the criteria of being:

• first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days); and
• first published before 1978 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities or after 1978 without copyright notice; and
• it was in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date.

And therefore meets the requirements of PD-URAA. Can you provide further information about your thinking regarding these deletions, and please do not delete any other maps until we have been able to resolve this issue? Thanks, Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Peacemaker67,

as you didn't provide filenames (please do so, next time, as I may perform hundreths of deletions per day), I assume you are refering to File:Druga neprijateljska ofanzi.jpg, File:Treća neprijateljska ofanzi.jpg, File:Operacija Weiss.jpg, File:Operacija Weiss II.jpg, File:Operacija Užice.jpg, File:Operacija Schwarz.jpg and File:Desant na Drvar.jpg.

Just to clarify: the wording of the edit-summary is not mine, but by the tagger User:ShinePhantom. It is automatically copied from the copyvio-template when performing the deletion.

However, the rationale of the tagger seemed plausible to me. The mentioned source-URL yields a 404. The appearance of the maps looks far more recent than 1952 to me.

Anyway, if you are strongly convinced that these maps are out of copyright, I can undelete and put them into a regular DR to provide a platform for discussion with input from other users. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

There you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Druga neprijateljska ofanzi.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about not listing the files. The rationale is definitely not correct, I am very familiar with the book as I have personally seen it in a partially destroyed high school library when I was in the former Yugoslavia in 1995-96. It was definitely published in 1952. The licensing of several of these files that I have uploaded has been checked by experienced image reviewers during image reviews of several Featured Articles on en WP which I have been the primary contributor to. I will fix the url for them all. If you could put them in a regular DR I will address all of this there. Thanks very much. Regards, Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Now all undeleted and put into above linked DR. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Fotos von Lena Nesic

Moin Túrelio,

kannst Du bitte wiederherstellen:

• File:Lidia Baich, 2020 Foto- Lena Nesic.jpg
• File:Lidia Baich.jpg

Wir haben unter Ticket:2021011410009914 eine Freigabe der Fotografin.

Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done; hier die korrekten Dateinamen: File:Lidia Baich .jpg und File:Lidia Baich, 2020 Foto- Lena Nesic .jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Danke! :-) Hab die Freigaben eingetragen. --Mussklprozz (talk) 17:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

User:Wowiskwpoopi

Hi Túrelio, and I hope you are well. The aforementioned user has continued to upload files claiming it's own work and file warring despite being warned several times. Can you please take actions on them? Thanks. Destroyeraa (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Wowiskwpoopi (talk) 20:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC) I didn’t say it was mine I just didn’t post a source

Could you please tell me the bad part of the image I uploaded?

I uploaded the same image that was on this site.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SpongeBob,_You%27re_Fired!_scene.jpg) I wanted to use this image on the Japanese Wikipedia, so I uploaded it to Wikipedia comons. This site (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SpongeBob,_You%27re_Fired!_scene.jpg) says fair use, but the image I uploaded (File:SpongeBob You're Fired scene.jpg)

has become a copyright violation. 

Could you please tell me the bad part of the image I uploaded? I'm sorry for my bad English.Hijikatayyy (talk) 01:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Hijikatayyy

"fair use" is a sort of exception from copyright, but is only valid for the country that has this exception in its law. As the U.S. law has this exception, :en-Wikipedia allows such material and has defined a specific exception policy for that. Other wikipedias might do so, depending on the relevant laws. However, per U.S. law and per our policy Commons (Commons:Fair use) cannot host such material. So, if Japanese copyright law has a similar exception and if Japanese Wikipedia has such a policy, you should be able to upload the image locally to your Wikpedia. --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you.Hijikatayyy (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Karamjeet Madonna

Hallo Túrelio, Du schreibst, Deutsch ist Deine Muttersprache - dann also auf Deutsch! :-)

Erstmal danke, dass Du Dich um diese URV gekümmert hast. Der Nutzer hat einen ganzen Haufen Bilder von dieser Frau hochgeladen, einige davon praktischerweise gleich mit "during a photo shoot" gekennzeichnet, also gewissermaßen selbsterklärte URV. Etliche davon findet man auch auf ihrer Website wieder; ich hab's jetzt nicht bei allen überprüft.

Ich hatte hier schon angefragt, ob es für sowas nicht eine Art Stapelverarbeitung gibt, aber ich weiß nicht, ob das da jemand sieht. Muss man womöglich jetzt jedes Bild einzeln markieren? --217.239.15.103 13:29, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Inzwischen alle gelöscht und Konto global gesperrt. --Túrelio (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Category for deletion

Hi there, would you kindly delete Category:Stop signs with "تمهل"? It was improperly created. The Arabic word does not mean "stop", it means "slow down". Fry1989 ^eh? 17:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done--Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Deleted image

Thank you for deleting this image. This image and this one were derived from the deleted image. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done--Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Transfer of an image to Commons

Dear Túrelio,

I just found out that you are also a member of Kathpedia, so I thought that you might be able to answer me whether this picture of Georg Ratzinger may be transferred to Commons.

Sincerely, --Rossel44 (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Rossel44, as kathpedia has CC-NC .. as their default license, the image cannot simply be transferred to Commons. You might ask kath.net editor-in-chief Roland Noé whether he would be willing to release the image under a Commons-compatible CC-BY-SA license.[6] --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Penguinz0.jpg

Can you check the logs and previous incarnations of File:Penguinz0.jpg? If the 3 incarnations are the same file, I will want to start one of these on the 3 contributing accounts. Two of the accounts are blocked on en-wiki. If it's not related, then that will be a relief. Davidwr (talk) 22:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Davidwr, all 3 image-versions (2 deleted, 1 online) are totally different photos. Common is only that all 3 uploaders claimed them as own work. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, it's a relief to hear it. It is interesting that the 14 January revision was also a copyright violation, but it's good to see it was a different image. Davidwr (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Inviting you to join the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Túrelio,

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a draft policy (available in many languages). We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am perfectly aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Carte Poitevin-Saintongeais

Bonjour,

You erased the File:Carte-poitevin-saintongeais.jpg, of my contributions. I'm a graphic designer and volunteer for the dissemination and promotion of minority languages. I made this greeting card for two associations of defense of the Poitevin-Saintongeais language : Parlanjhe Asteur and Anrantéle. As an author I published it on my site too : lu-chapeu.jimdofree.com/ , and on commons.wikimedia.org/ because it's a free work, available to everyone.

Please make this file available to all. It makes it possible to present this language on a current medium, in its standardized record.

Thank you to respect this choice. Merci.

Jiròni B. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiròni B. (talk • contribs) 10:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

did you also shoot the background photography (Harmonia bug etc.) or was this a stock-image? --Túrelio (talk) 11:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Folkki2080

Hi!

You seemed to file two of my uploads as not following copyright. Could you specify what kind of information you would need. Since these are quite basic pictures of people that have a wikipedia-page it did not seem relevant to add so much meta data. Especially info that Graham Hunter would own one of the pictures seemed really odd, I have no clue who this person is.

EDIT: seems that the metadata might have came from the fact that the camera the picture is taken with is bought from someone in the UK, even though of course the picture is taken in Finland and not by the previous owner of the camera.

EDIT 2: The easiest way for me to load the picture was to take it from a messenger chat where it was, the original was not available at just that point. Does not take away from the fact that I have the right to put it to Wikimedia Commons. I have not uploaded so many times so that I would know how exactly I can make sure that these unnessecary tags of violation could be taken away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Folkki2080 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Best regards, Folkki2080 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Folkki2080 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

It is not so much about missing information, but about your claim of "own work", which is put into question by the clues found.

File:Peppi Seppälä.jpg: relatively small resolution, metadata contain code showing it's taken from Facebook or Instagram. In addition, on the website of the depicted person, there is an image shot in the same setting[7].

File:Bicca Olin.jpg: metadata identify Graham Hunter as the photographer, and contain code showing its taken from Facebook or Instagram.

Finally, you had earlier uploads of images of Bicca Olin which were deleted under suspicion of being copyvios.

So, if you want to contest my evaluation, you need to do that at Commons:UDR. --Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

How is one supposed to prove to you/ Commons community that I have the right to upload my own photos even though similar photos are on other places on the internet or I have loaded them to Facebook to the person to see/comment and then onwards to Wikimedia? The previous Bicca Olin picture was also taken by me but it was used by a newspaper without them crediting me, and it seemed easier to just use a unused picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Folkki2080 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

HI, as I told you already, you need to discuss this at UDR. A possibility to support your claim, might be uploading temporarily the original raw or untouched image-files, as it came out of the camera. You would not need to put it really under a free license, just upload it as evidence. --Túrelio (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Маша Вебер.jpg

Hello. Restore this, please. photographer sends a permit to the OTRS - Ticket#2021012210006072 --NoFrost (talk) 07:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done, but now we have a duplicate File:Masha Weber.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

• Sorry. Didn't check before asking you. Now delete, please, again File:Маша Вебер.jpg. --NoFrost (talk) 08:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
• Thanks --NoFrost (talk) 08:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

PRO.jpg

You listed my image in Wikimedia: Deletion List.

Why????????????????

I made it myself on MS Paint and TUX Paint and several other apps.

There is no copyright issue with it.

Then Why??????????????????????/

Akshat2103 (talk) 15:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, there is no pro.jpg. Likely you are talking about File:PRO_akki.jpg, right? Well, if you look at the edit-history, you might understand what actually happened. Your file was tagged for speedy-deletion by somebody else. I converted this to a regular (slow) deletion-request to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 16:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate of Rank insignia

Oh, dear Túrelio! Please replace duplicate (old modification of the picture) two file: File:1870ir036-p12r.png → and File:1870ir036-p12.png → . These are the same shoulder straps for the period 1874-1904. The author of these figures will confirm this. — Niklitov (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Niklitov,

I have put your requests into regular DRs. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Livioandronico2013 global ban

Is Livioandronico2013 globally banned? Would you suggest that I open an RFC on Meta for the ban of him and his sock puppets? Elizium23 (talk) 16:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, yes, the account is globally locked since Febr. 2020 and banned on Commons since 2018[8]. --Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Restoration request

Hello. Following an error this morning, can you restore the following 4 files:

• File:Printemps de Bourges 2019-26, palais d'Auron et affiches.jpg
• File:Printemps de Bourges 2019-27, façade et affiches.jpg
• File:Printemps de Bourges 2019-29, façade et affiches.jpg
• File:Printemps de Bourges 2019-35, point recyclage - Printemps Durable.jpg

Thank you. --Cjp24 (talk) 19:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

You are aware they were duplicates? --Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Redirects are irrelevant. --Cjp24 (talk) 20:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I do not understand. You first asked the currently deleted and redirected files to be restored. Now, if they are irrelevant, shall they NOT be restored? --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Please, see the history for each file (error). --Cjp24 (talk) 20:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

See also here. --Cjp24 (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Foto de mi propiedad eliminada.

Si la Fotografía de "Viaducto Las Polvorillas" es mía y fue eliminada y no está en google cómo e leído, entonces se a hecho contra mi Vandalismo, ya que la foto es mía y por eso mismo la volveré a subir ya que es Injusto. EduWiki EduWiki 22:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

See thread below. --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Genesis block

Hi, i also pinged you here File_talk:Bitcoin-Genesis-block.jpg and I pinged you on the article. Please chose one of those venues to respond to my question (I think more suitable than here on talk), I am pining you here as you didnt respond to my pings. I would prefer to discuss on wikipedia than wikimedia (if all is the same) since I dont often login to wikimedia, but if we must discuss copyrights on wikimedia, that is ok too. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 10:13, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I get far too much pings to follow them. Better use this talkpage. As I'm not so often on :en, local messages on :en don't make much sense when it's about a deletion on Commons, where we follow our policy, which may differ from :en-policy. File:Bitcoin-Genesis-block.jpg was a sort of borderline (though within PCP policy). However, I am willing to undelete the file and put it into a regular DR to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, please undelete and we can do a DR. Thanks! What part of the file was considered borderline? It would not be all those numbers, are you referring to the quote? I dont think a short quote from the newspaper that is already attributed to Times of London could be construed as copyright issue. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 13:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

"Borderline" referred to the copyvio-suspicion and associated decision. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Lion and Lamb now Libertys Great Yarmouth 20 July 2013.JPG

Hi Kolforn, in case of duplicates usually the older version is kept. More importantly, the 2 versions have different authors to be credited: Cheeseladder and Kolforn. What's behind that? --Túrelio (talk) 09:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Cheesladder was a former user name that I once used but has since been deleted on wikipedia. This was due to the fact that I was being trolled and cyber bulled at the time, so changed my user name!Kolforn (talk) 10:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Undo delete for this file

Hi Turelio, too late I have renamed File:BS290 RK-27 moored at Quay and BS255 RK-37 alongside her in Port of Sozopol 17 June 2018.jpg yet and I have deleted a correct file, undo delete, thanks, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 09:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, Túrelio! --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 09:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Túrelio

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Before I tag for deletion

Hi Túrelio! I was just going back over some of my contributions, and came across the following two images again: File:Mary Gaylord Mclean and The Five gaited Mare, "According to Lynn" (3930800948).jpg and File:Mary Gaylord Mclean and The Five gaited Mare, "According to Lynn" (3930800948) (cropped).jpg The cropped version removes the watermark which is more desirable, so we can probably delete the file with the watermark, or should we simply replace it by uploading the cropped version over it? ^Atsme _Talk 📧 10:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Atsme,

contrary to our practise and to the message in {{Watermark}}, removal of watermarks, which contain (C) information, might have some legal risk, als outlined in Commons:Watermarks#Legal_issues_with_the_removal_of_watermarks. Though this was never translated into policy, one should keep that in mind. Now, in order to maintain transparency, it might be better to upload the no-wm-file over the wm-file, which would easily allow to switch back to the original wm-version of the image. However, that's not more than a suggestion. Redirecting (and deleting) the wm-file to the no-wm-file (via duplicate-process) would also be in policy, but would remove the record of the Flickr-Review bot, which confirms the CC license at time of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 13:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Interesting - so are we now accepting watermarked images at the time of upload, unlike what we used to reject?? As for the two images, I have no issue with keeping them as is - it was just a suggestion because it's silly to have 2 of the same image. Perhaps if the watermark issue is a problem, we should delete the one that cropped-out the watermark. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

"so are we now accepting watermarked images" — I never said that. Also "we used to reject" isn't really true. We discouraged them and asked uploaders whether they could re-upload without visible watermark (invisible ones aren't a problem). After upload their fate was likely determined by the value of the image. If you, as the uploader, now prefer the wm-cropped image to be deleted, please first remove it from its use on :en. Thereafter I can delete it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Actresses from Turkey born in the 2000s

Hi. Revive Category:Actresses from Turkey born in the 2000s please. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 11:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Datei gelöscht

Hallo Túrelio, ich glaube Sie haben meine Datei File:Saeed Habibzadeh 1.jpg gelöscht, die ich hochgeladen habe. Ich habe das Urheberrecht an dem Bild, daher möchte ich Sie bitten, die Datei wieder herzustellen. Das wäre sehr schön, vielen Dank! Beste Grüße, --Maverick7x (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Maverick7x,

die Datei wurde wegen URV-Verdacht gelöscht, weil sie anderswo publiziert gefunden wurde, z.B. hier: https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91R8gooflwL._SY600_.jpg. Außerdem hatte sie keine Kamera-Metadaten. Hast du das Foto wirklich selbst aufgenommen oder hast du es vom Abgebildeten erhalten? --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, vielen Dank für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich bin der Verleger des Abgebildeten. Wir haben mittlerweile eine große Sammlung an Bildern. Das Bild wurde von unserem Verlag oder vom Abgebildeten aufgenommen, wobei wir uns gegenseitig jeweils sämtliche zeitlich und räumlich uneingeschränkten Nutzungs- und Verwertungsrechte einräumen. Das Bild auf Amazon, welches Du als Referenz angibst, wurde ebenfalls von uns hochgeladen. Vielen Dank und Beste Grüße, --Maverick7x (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Maverick7x,

ok. Dann solltest von deiner Geschäftsadresse eine Bestätigung der Lizenz an [email protected] (OTRS) senden. Dazu benutzt du am besten dieses Formular: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber). Sobald du das abgeschickt hast, gib mir 1 kurze Nachricht hier, dann entlösche ich das Bild. --Túrelio (talk) 15:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, ich habe das Formular soeben versendet. Beste Grüße, --Maverick7x (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! Bild ist direkt wieder da gewesen! Beste Grüße, --Maverick7x (talk) 18:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Bilder entfernt

Was ist der Grund, weshalb die Zwei Bilder gelöscht worden. Das Thema: File:Marcelo Hernandez, Hamburger Abendblatt.jpg. Auf welchem Weg kann man diese Bilder bestehen lassen? Wname1 (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Foto: Marcelo Hernandez / HA und © Hamburger Abendblatt 2020 – Alle Rechte vorbehalten. D.h., in beiden Fällen keinerlei Evidenz für die beanspruchte cc-by-sa-4.0-Lizenz. Du müsstest den Abendblatt-Fotografen dazu bringen, dass er sie unter einer brauchbaren freien Lizenz freigibt, was er kaum machen wird. --Túrelio (talk) 17:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Informationen. Wname1 (talk) 17:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Flag map of poland

Why did you delete Poland-Flagmap.svg ? it was my own work and different from other versions. I have made flag maps for other countries and I will make for all soon.Kamran.nef (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, as it had been tagged as duplicate of File:Poland map flag.svg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

It is not, my maps are from OpenStreetMap and do not exist in other pages.Kamran.nef (talk) 11:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

You did not understand, it's not about copyvio or alike. Duplicate means we had two identical images on Commons: File:Poland-Flagmap.svg and File:Poland map flag.svg. --Túrelio (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

ok please return Poland-Flagmap.svg and I'll make sure that it will be my version. I have created the page.And please tell me how to prevent others from changing the page so that does not happen.Kamran.nef (talk) 11:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done, now you have exactly the version on which I acted. Anybody can add such a tag if they see 2 identical images. We have a policy that there should be no duplicates. --Túrelio (talk) 11:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much.Kamran.nef (talk) 12:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Túrelio,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Privacy

Uploader request. --E4024 (talk) 16:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 taken care.--Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Copyright violations

I notice you have already cautioned this editor about copyright violations. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 taken care.--Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Undeletion

Hi Túrelio. Can you please restore Georgina-Gascoyne-Cecil-ne-Alderson-Marchioness-of-Salisbury.jpg and Catherine-Gladstone-ne-Glynne.jpg? These were not duplicates. Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 01:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

KY pic

It's my picture. Do not delete. I am Kim's student and close friend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huertamor (talk • contribs) 20:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, image has already been deleted by a colleague. However, be honest, you hardly shot an image of her, when she was around 10 years old. --Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Why did you delete the photo of the painting by Jack Osterroth? File:Jack Osterroth - Worms.jpg

I'm very confused, you deleted the photo of the painting for the Jewish Cemetery in Worms by Jack Osterroth. Why? Are you a government official in the area of rights management? Do you believe you own the copyright to that photo/painting? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpage66 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, sorry that the image-tagger didn't notify you about the reason. The painting is still in copyright, as the artist died only in 1981; so it will remain in copyright til end of 2051. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

The painting belongs to me. It was a gift from the artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpage66 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Doesn't matter. See my reply on your :de-talkpage. And please sign your postings. --Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm confused. It matters to me and everyone who would enjoy viewing this painting. Are you an heir to the family? Are you a government official that enforces rights management? Who are you and what is your position? I am very confused about your interest in this matter. Thank you. Hpage66 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpage66 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Could you stop focusing on me, instead of the facts! Did you even read what I wrote on your :de-talkpage? Fact 1: A work of art is under the copyright of the artist til 70 years after his/her death. Fact 2: If you buy (or get donated) a painting, you own that material piece. But the copyright for the work remains with the artist (or his heirs), as long as he/she didn't transfer it. So, you can hang up the painting in your house, but you cannot make a reproduction of the painting and distribute it, as this would violate the copyright of the artist. EOD. If you want to contest my decision, go to Commons:UDR. To satisfy your curiosity, I am an Admin or sysop. But your image was first spotted and tagged by a recent-uploads patroler. --Túrelio (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

How do you know that I don't own all rights to the painting ? I have now idea what a de-talkpage is. All I know -- apparently -- you are not a government official, you are not related to the artist, you have not served anyone with a DCMA takedown notice. I have no idea what an upload patroler is. Sincerely, Hpage66. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hpage66 (talk • contribs) 05:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

"your :de-talkpage" is your own talkpage on :de-Wikipedia, where you already posted a comment: de:Benutzer Diskussion:Hpage66. For any further discussion go to Commons:UDR.--Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Niniva Sirija.jpg

OK. My mistake, sorry.--Ванилица (talk) 21:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Seitsmeste Uudiste saatejuht Ingrid Teesalu.jpg

Hi!

The photo I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons is my personal photo from my mobile phone. I own all the rights. I also gave the article where it was published the rights to use it.

All the best! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:7D0:82AB:580:9C56:5408:45BF:660E (talk) 15:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Unknown,

if that is the case, then please send a plain confirmation from your email address to [email protected] . --Túrelio (talk) 16:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi

Do you also see a troll activity around User talk:SuperSucker or it's just my imagination? Should this not be stopped? Danke. --E4024 (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Talkpage of globally locked user. --Túrelio (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Conflict on File:Stary Oskol Kapitan Guryev.jpg

Hey Túrelio, I conflicted with you on File:Stary Oskol Kapitan Guryev.jpg. You deleted it as I was declining the CSD, as the file was published by the Royal Navy under the OGL. I've restored the image, but if you have any objections I'd gladly take it to DR. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I am fine with that. No need for DR. --Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

About the VictorBeer.jpg image

I've provided a link for license information about this image on my discussion page. Here is my message: I do not feel like this is true. According to TikTok's community guidelines (https://www.tiktok.com/legal/copyright-policy), people are not allowed to upload media or content of other people's intellectual property, meaning this image should not be copyright protected. Can you please look over this and hopefully reverse this action? Hugo Rydman (talk) 22:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

well, that's the theory, like with Facebook. Most people have little understanding of copyright. If you assume that this tiktok-account belongs to Victor Beer, why don't you simply ask him directly for an image under a free license? Though you will tell him that you need it for his article on :sv-Wikipedia, you need to make clear that we do not accept images "only for Wikipedia", but that images on Wikipedia need to be released by the rightsholder under a free license, which allows anybody to use it, see Commons:Licensing/sv. If he has a suitable image for which he has the full copyright from the photographer, he can send a permission directly to [email protected], using the template in Commons:E-postmallar. --Túrelio (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

File: VTMM Logo.png

Hi, I’m currently drafting an article about VTMM and I had uploaded a PNG logo for the Virtual Team Maturity Model. However, I discovered that you may have deleted the image. I didn’t receive any notice that the image was queued for deletion. It is a copyrighted image, and I had used the correct tags. Additionally, I have written authorisation from the copyright owner to use the image for the wiki article I’m writing. Please let me know the next steps. Thanks. Camrybrown (talk) 23:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Camrybrown,

as a general advice, it might be better to first draft the article and get it on Wikipedia, and thereafter upload eventual media files. Otherwise the notability or being-in-scope might be brought up, as it happened now.

The permission, which you received from the rightsholder of that logo, needs to be send to [email protected] (OTRS). You may forward to them what you have received, however, our OTRS-volunteers usually require that it gets sent directly from the rightsholder. For privacy-reasons, I have removed all the email-content, which you had pasted into File:Logo VTMM.jpg, as it contained your and the other's email address.

As you will probably need to communicate again with the rightsholder, there are more issues: any media uploaded to Commons need to have been released under a so-called free license, which allows anybody to use it, provided the terms are met. So, a permission (only) for use on Wikipedia is not accepted, neither on Commons nor on Wikipedia. This needs to be communicated clearly to the rightsholder; otherwise they may feel betrayed, when they realize it. Acceptable free licenses are mentioned on COM:L. The rightsholder needs to mention a specific license in his permission.

In addition, you should ask the rightsholder whether they have trademark-protected their logo. That is not a problem for Commons/Wikipedia, but may be for certain external re-uses. So, it should be mentioned. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

My uploads

Thanks for letting me know re my uploads. I have permissions in each case. Sorry re what happened. The Lothlorien pics - I am in contact with the flickr author and sent her the link to authorize. Will her authorization here through OTRS work or would she need to change the CC on her Flickr? Re kingman and casa zimbabwe pics, what should be done with the file info so that I can send the authors OTRS links? I can forward you emails authorising uploads for each batch of pictures, so that they don't get speedy deleted. What is the issue with Alice in Wonderland Kingman.jpg aside from authorisation? Copyright permission from the painter of the mural? Thank you Rybkovich (talk) 22:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The Lothlorien pics are already deleted. If the Flickr-author is willing to switch temporarily to CC-BY oder CC-BY-SA license, you should agree with him/her over a specific time frame (of 2-3 hours), preferably morning in the U.S and evening in Europe. I could then undelete the images and let Flickr-review-bot run again and confirm the license. If the Flickr-author doesn't like that process, he/she needs to send an email from his Flickr-account to [email protected] in which he/she needs to declare that he is the photographer and Flickr-author and that he confirms the choosen Commons-compliant license (which differs from Flickr).

File:Alice in Wonderland Kingman.jpg has 2 copyrights and thereby 2 problems: you need to obtain permission 1) from the photographer and 2) from the painter, who needs to give permission that the image, which said photographer took from painting, can be released under the choosen free license. (U.S. has no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works) Both permissions need to be sent directly from the rightsholder to [email protected] . I am offline now, as it is already late night for me. --Túrelio (talk) 16:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Re lothlorian pics: The author has switched her license to CC BY-ND 2.0. Thank you Rybkovich (talk) 22:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

"CC BY-ND" doesn't help, as it is not accepted as a "free license" (see COM:L). It should be CC-BY oder CC-BY-SA (or CC-Zero). --Túrelio (talk) 22:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

I see its the NoDerivs. Thank you. Rybkovich (talk) 19:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

CC-BY-2.0 will work? The 2.0 means that there have been changes in the legal clauses, but the essence is the same? Rybkovich (talk) 23:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes. AFAIK, Flickr offers this version of the CC-BY license among their defaults. Though there are differences in the fineprint, CC-BY is CC-BY, independant of the version. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Temporarily reduce protection on India location map

I simplified layering for India location map (no nested layers inside groups like there is now) and merged all international provinces/subdivisions in the other countries layer into a single path and reduced the document size to ~1.3 MB. I can't upload these changes currently so is it possible you can briefly reduce protection to semi-protected or extended-protected (please ping me when u respond so I know the timespan u will do so) so that I can update it? I have made no changes to the actual territory under consideration, least of all any disputed territory.all this was was reorganizing. C1MM (talk) 06:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

@C1MM, could you provide the file name. Are you on-wiki now? General advise: a better place for such requests is COM:AN. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

I am now. I want to overwrite an existing file File:India location map.svg so is it better if I upload the new file under a different name, some admin downloads it and makes the change themselves? Not sure what to do. C1MM (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

@C1MM, if you are ready, I will reduce protection in 2 minutes from now on, for a short span. I trust that you will only make non-controversial changes. --Túrelio (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

@C1MM, regrettably you did not update, despite my additional notification on your talkpage. So, after waiting for 15 minutes, I renewed the original protection level. Next time, please request at File talk:India location map.svg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I had some other work I was doing and wasn't paying attention. I'll pay better attention to the talk page request on the file itself. C1MM (talk) 17:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio: see this section of the India location map talk page. No one has responded yet. I uploaded a new file containing the changes I want to make to the India location map here so if u could merge that file with File:India location map.svg instead that would be good. C1MM (talk) 01:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

@C1MM: , today I'm too busy in RL. As I don't know in which time-zone you are living, please propose a fitting time-frame for tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Since I don't have admin privileges I don't think I can merge files. I'll ask on the admin noticeboard and see what comes up. C1MM (talk) 16:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

If you are ready, we could do it NOW. --Túrelio (talk) 16:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I can't merge files though, I thought that was reserved for admins. I published on the noticeboard and nothing happened. I can't do anything now that I've uploaded a duplicate copy, it has to be an admin that does the merger. C1MM (talk) 17:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

File: Эдмон_Марукян_1.jpg

Dear Túrelio,

This photo was made by me as I am the Advisor of Mr. Marukyan on media and international issues. By different Armenian media platforms this photo has being actively using (same was done by http://politik.am/am/hayastani-gortsox-ishkhanutyuny-hashvi-chi-arel-ynddimutyan-kartsiqy-edmon-maruqyan). But photo was done by me as a representative of Mr. Marukyan and I have all the rights to use the photo. Tigrangasparyan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigrangasparyan (talk • contribs) 11:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Tigrangasparyan,

ok. But then you should send a confirmation-email from your official/business email address to [email protected] confirming your authorship and intent of the choosen free license. Please confirm if you will do that, then I can remove the speedy-tag from the file. --Túrelio (talk) 11:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Deletion for Copyright violation of File:Gary caos.jpg

Hi Túrelio, I saw you set the file to be deleted because it was used on the Tracksource page of Gary Caos. I have the permission of the artist and the photographer to publish the photo.

Kindly Regards, Antonio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoniolaccetti (talk • contribs) 22:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Antonio,

ok. Then he (Gary Caos) needs to send a confirmation of the choosen free license for File:Gary caos.jpg to [email protected] . --Túrelio (talk) 22:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Creating File:1st Glass Work (2021).jpg

Hallo Túrelio, das war eines der ersten Bilder, die ich hochgeladen habe. Ich wollte es zu einem Artikel hinzufügen auf wikipedia. Es ist die Arbeit eines Künstlers. Das Bild wurde gelöscht. Ich habe die Erlaubnis des Künstlers (ist auch gleichzeitig der Fotograf). Kannst du mir erläutern wieso? Und evtl. helfen, es noch einmal hochzuladen? Danke und viele Grüße. Hllmld (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Hllmld,

nun, das Problem war 1) dass es ein aktuelles Kunstwerk ist und offensichtlich in einem Innenraum steht, womit die Ausnahmeregelung der Panoramafreiheit entfällt; also geschützt und somit Erlaubnis-bedürftig, und 2) dass du keinen Lizenzbaustein gesetzt und eine Quelle angegeben hast, die das "Das Urheberrecht aller dargestellten Bilder und Texte liegt bei Michael Bacht und den Autoren. Copyright 1976-2007" sagt. Also nahezu beliebig viele URV-Argumente. :-)

Um die Sache in Ordnung zu bringen: bereite für Herrn Bacht eine Genehmigungserklärung vor, auf Basis dieser Vorlage, in du den Dateinamen deiner Datei (oder die komplette URL auf Commons) einfügst, sowie die Lizenz, auf die du dich mit Herrn Bacht geeinigt hast (hast du?). Die fertige Erklärung schickst du ihm dann per Email und bittest ihn, sie zu unterzeichnen (einfach seinen Namen drunterzuschreiben) und zu datieren, und dann von seiner offiziellen Emailadresse an [email protected] zu schicken (also nicht von deiner Emailadresse aus). Wenn du das an ihn geschickt hast, gibst du mir hier kurz Becheid, dann entlösche ich die Datei vorübergehend; also nicht neu hochladen. Ist das Originalwerk tatsächlich von 2021?--Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Πατριάρχης Δημήτριος.jpg

This image is fotomontage. The original file is File:Varfholomey (2019-01-05) 25 (cropped).jpg. In the photo editor, I likened the features of Patriarch Bartholomew to Patriarch Demetrius. RC-1841 (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi RC-1841,

thanks for this clarification. However, we cannot do this especially with living people, as it violates their personality rights. In addition, it's unencyclopedic. It's might be o.k. in art, however, his requires that it be clearly stated. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Permissions on recently tagged photos

Hi Túrelio,

You tagged these files:

File:Author-kathryn-trueblood.jpg File:Siamak Baharloo.png

I have permission to use both. I will email the permissions to [email protected].

Thank you.

-Wendy

Niente21 (talk) 21:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Wendy,

as I tagged 3 of your uploads, for which do you have permission? In addition, the permission needs to be sent directly by the rightsholder to OTRS ([email protected]), not forwarded. --Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Josh Smith photo

Hi,

You marked the photo I posted as copyright. I work for Josh Smith at his nonprofit foundation. I will delete the file and repost it when I get written permission from Josh to post it. Thank you.

Sincerely,

cedsall 2.24.2021 Cedsall (talk) 21:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you do not need to delete it (which you actually can't). If you send a request for permission to the photographer/rightsholder, I will tag the image "permission pending". --Túrelio (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Is there a way I can request for the picture to be deleted until we obtain the proper permission? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedsall (talk • contribs) 21:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Sure. You can add {{speedy|1=G7}} to the image page. --Túrelio (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Where can I access the image page if I removed the image from the page it was originally posted on? Cedsall (talk) 21:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC) cedsall 2.24.2021

Oh, you are very new here. Go to your userpage User:Cedsall, even if it's still empty. See the lower box to the left and click on "contributions". --Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I believe I deleted the images by adding {{speedy|1=G7}} when I hit edit on both pages. 24 February 2021 (UTC) cedsall 2.24.2021

Not exactly, you requested deletion, and I performed it. Deletion of files requires "higher rights" on Wikimedia projects. --Túrelio (talk) 21:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help. 24 February 2021 (UTC) cedsall 2.24.2021

Fotos

Recientemente subí unas fotografias de mi autoria y tienen mis derechos y por eso las subí a la pagina de Camargo Lalof3 (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, if you want to contest some deletions, you need to get more specific to what file you are refering. --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Löschung

Hallo! Bist du bitte so nett und löschst die Datei File:Warendorf, Freckenhorst, Wohnhaus -- 2014 -- 8635.jpg. Es ist, wenn ich das richtig sehe, die einzige Aufnahme eines Wohnhauses, die ich seinerzeit gemacht habe. Ich möchte einfach eventuelle Konflikte vermeiden. Ich weiß auch, dass der Antrag spät kommt. Danke! --XRay 💬 06:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Ala Hadrat.jpg

File:Ala Hadrat.jpg must be deleted as it is from a non authentic source ie. a random Facebook fan page Saudmujadidi (talk) 04:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Saudmujadidi,

with regard to copyright this image seems to be unproblematic, as it fulfills the criteria for PD-India, at least if the depicted person is the person who it is claimed. In this regard it doesn't matter what the actually source is.

Oh the other hand, from an encyclopedical standpoint it is important whether the image is authentic, as you stated. However, we at Commons can hardly decide this question. Therefore it would be better to open a discussion about this question on the project where this image is/was used. --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Firuze Nesibli

Hallo. I understand User:Firuze Nesibli wants to delete the Category:Firuze Nesibli. I think she has the right to it. Please help her. --E4024 (talk) 12:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Hypnotized album cover.jpg and File:Together- A New Chuck Mangione Concert album cover.jpg

I need to insert the {Non-free album cover|image has rationale=yes} template for these images and have forgotten how to do it. Can you assist? J. Van Meter (talk) 22:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

@J. Van Meter: Hello there. Please note that Commons does not accept fair use, so I had to delete your files. All uploads here need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose. Please upload those album covers directly at the English Wikipedia or any other Wikipedia that does accept fair use. De728631 (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

--Okay. It's been years since I edited. my error. J. Van Meter (talk) 22:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

File:001 Suzanne Ciani - LIVE Quadraphonic Box Art 201115-1920x1920.png

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind taking a look at File:001 Suzanne Ciani - LIVE Quadraphonic Box Art 201115-1920x1920.png? I think you might have deleted this file before either as File:Suzanne Ciani - LIVE Quadraphonic (Vinyl Box Set).jpg or as File:Suzanne Ciani - LIVE Quadraphonic.jpg. The same editor uploaded the each of the three files. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly,

you are right. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio. I own this image. I supplied it to wired for the article about suzanne and i and I also own the CyKiK.com website. Please leave the image up. Kamranv (talk) 14:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Deleted Family Tree

Hi,

You flagged a file that I uploaded as a copyright issue. I contacted Migebert who said you deleted it. I created and own this file and I uploaded it. I also own www.britonthemove.com Please remove the copyright flag and re-load the image. Thanks, Nikki

Hello Nikki, This page answers questions about the photo competitions. I can not help. Please ask User: Túrelio. He deleted the picture. Please excuse my bad english, translated with google.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jürgen Lehmann

‪Migebert‬ left a message on your talk page in "‪File:Vanderbilt Family Tree.jpg‬". File:Vanderbilt Family Tree.jpg wurde als mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung gekennzeichnet. Auf den Wikimedia Commons werden nur Dateien, die unter fr… View message ‪Migebert‬ View changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9001:2707:2863:157a:48:ced7:3933 (talk • contribs)

Hi Nikki,

next time please log-in under your username.

File:Vanderbilt Family Tree.jpg had been tagged as copyvio-suspected, because the source site[9], from which it was taken, 1) is labeled as "Copyright © Brit on the Move 2020 All Rights Reserved" and 2) below the image in question there is an expressed statement "This image is subject to copyright, and it may not be used without explicit permission from Brit on the Move."

I have no idea who is Jürgen Lehmann, as he isn't mentioned in the image description. In addition, when the file was patroled by User:Migebert it had no author-entry and the source-entry was https://britonthemove.com/the-biltmore-estate, which is an ARR-site. So, the assessment of the file as having no evidence of permission (=copyvio) was quite correct.

Now, to solve the problem: if you are the rightsholder of britonthemove.com, then send a mail from your official britonthemove.com-email address to [email protected] (OTRS) and confirm 1) that you are the author or rightsholder of said image and that you want to release the uploaded image File:Vanderbilt Family Tree.jpg under the choosen free license. When you have send the email, drop me a note, so that I can undelete the file. --Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Done - please re-load the image — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 97.100.192.144 (talk) 14:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I had expressedly asked you to log-in under your username before commenting here. The next time I will not simply assume that some random IP is User:Moving On With Brit. --Túrelio (talk) 14:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I am logged in now. I assumed you meant "next time I raise an issue".

Please reload the image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moving On With Brit (talk • contribs) 19:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I had the image had already un-deleted when I postet my last comment on Sunday. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Waldow-Laendernotarkasse Leipzig Treppenhaus.jpg

Hallo Túrelio,

wir haben mit Ticket:2021030110011182 eine Freigabe hereinbekommen, die definitiv von Wolf v. Waldow stammt. Stimmt das mit den Metadaten des Fotos überein? Falls ja, kannst Du das Bild bitte wiederherstellen? Falls nein, bitte nur kurz Bescheid, ich schreibe ihm dann zurück, dass seine Freigabe nicht zu den Metadaten passt.

Danke und Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Jetzt ist mir beim Abarbeiten der Support-Warteschlange File:Wolf v. Waldow Hilfestellung VI. Schulsporthallen Kniprodestraße 27, Berlin-Pankow, 2016.jpg untergekommen. Offensichtlich ist Wolf von Waldow der Künstler, und die Genehmigung des Fotografen steht noch aus. Ist das bei dem oben genannten Bild ebenso? --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

also die Metadaten sind fast leer. Es gibt nur 1 IPTC-Eintrag "rolfkaliske.de/fotos" (die Website gibt es). Das könnte auf den Fotografen hindeuten. Wir haben hier ja 2 Urheberrechte, des Künstlers und des Fotografen. Der Hochlader User:Kunstimraum hat es (Foto) ja als eigenes Werk angegeben. In der Beschreibung steht "Wolf v. Waldow: Kunstprojekt ...", was sich offenkundig auf das Kunstwerk bezieht. --Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Wolf von Waldow hat in Bezug auf das zweite Foto geantwortet. Er will die Freigabe des Fotografen besorgen. Ich denke, wir können es riskieren, das erste Bild genauso zu behandeln, d. h. wiederherstellen, ich setze dann OTRS received rein und schreibe ihm zurück, dass wir auch hier die Freigabe des Fotografen brauchen. Einverstanden? – Gruß und schönen Abend, --Mussklprozz (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC) Ich geh jetzt Pfannkuchen backen.

 Done. Guten Appetit! --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Help me delete this picture

Hello!

Would you like to help me deleting this photo that I uploaded some time ago? I don't have copyright for it. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:10_august.jpg

Thank you!

Alexmarzea1 (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Youtuber timo Klop

hey ik zie dat je mijn foto die ik heb gemaakt heb verwijderd — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenkHuizers (talk • contribs) 19:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, as you were notified on your talkpage, the image was found prepublished on Spotify and thereby suspected a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

But the influencer himzelf give perms for using it — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenkHuizers (talk • contribs) 19:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

request to speed delete a file

Dear Túrelio,

I am Tea0602 and would be grateful, if you could delete this file as son as possible: File:Queen-barbie-loge-barbie-deinhoffs-berlin.jpg .

I bought the photo, but should not have uploaded it on wiki commons. Please delete - thank you!!! Tea Tea0602 (talk) 16:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Recent file deletions

Hi, hope you are doing well. You have deleted File:Vice Admiral (Rtd) Shah Sohail Masood.jpg and File:Vice admiral Muhammad Fayyaz Gilani.jpg for copyright violations. Both files are published by ISPR under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 which is mentioned by the organization at https://ispr.gov.pk/disclaimer.php TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, my bad, sorry. Both restored. --Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Deleted picture

Hi, I noticed that you have deleted a picture I have uploaded, File:Leni von Bonsdorff.jpg. I got the picture from Leni von Bonsdorff herself and she submitted an OTRS permission on January 27:th 2021 to [email protected] CC [email protected] so I wonder if there has been some kind of mixup? Kind regards Lina Fredrika (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Lina,

the OTRS agent, who dealt with the permission, stated: "Uploader states in OTRS ticket #2021012710006358 that she has misunderstood the terms. The photo was taken by a professional photographer, but the uploader has forgotten the name, so she can't get back to ask for permission. This is therefor to be considered copyright infringement and the photo must be deleted." That was the reason for the deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 11:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your quick reply, I did not realize that she submitted that information. Is there anything I can do yo get the picture restored? Lina Fredrika (talk) 11:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

You might contact the OTRS agent User:Riggwelter, But there is no magic trick. If she really doesn't remember the name of the photographer, though unlikely that sounds for a photo from 2020, he/she can't be asked for permission. --Túrelio (talk) 11:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! :) Lina Fredrika (talk) 12:17, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Logo Garoa CC-BY-SA

Olá @Túrelio: , you had not cited my username so I was never notified of your answer.

About what you claim the license is, I must say that it is more likely a misuderstanding on your part. The page I linked does not state anything like what you say. Instead, it is says very clearly and in bold letters that «O logotipo do Garoa está disponibilizado sob licença Creative Commons como CC-BY-SA». So, please, could you bring back the logo?

Abraço, and thank you again for your attention,

Solstag (talk) 17:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Solstag, when I go to https://garoa.net.br/wiki/Logotipos I still read "Os desenhos então registrados sob a licença Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)." --Túrelio (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Keisha-White-3.jpg deletion yesterday

Hi there - Indra Lazinda took the photo of Keisha White and Keisha White owns the copyright to this photo. Please advise on un-deletion. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mn2spr (talk • contribs) 17:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, ok, then Keisha White needs to send from her official/business email adress an email to [email protected] confirming 1) that she owns the copyright and 2) that she wants to release this image under the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 17:38, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Grieben (Tangermünde).jpg

Hallo, eine Frage: Ist eine Löschung nicht besser, als eine Weiterleitung? Gleiches Bild, aber falscher Titel. Grieben gehört zu Tangerhütte - nicht zu Tangermünde. Habe wohl die falsche Vorlage erwischt. Gruß --Georgfotoart (talk) 18:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

nein, eigentlich nicht. Der Grund dafür ist, dass externe Nutzer des ursprünglich inkorrekt benamten Bildes bei einer bloßen Löschung im Nirvana landen (insbes. bei Hotlinking), während dank der WL das Bild weiterhin angezeigt wird. Bei Dateien, die erst vor wenigen tagen hochgeladen wurden, kann man sich das natürlich sparen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Danke --Georgfotoart (talk) 11:47, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Elijah Onyeagba

Thank you for your query on the jpg file. But I have corrected that and added the details of the original owner of the jpg file. I wish to request that the file be retained. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torksimlife (talk • contribs) 09:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

You stated that the jpg. file is not free per se. Kindly expatiate on that because the file has been granted permission for use by the owner Elijah Onyeagba

Hi Torksimlife,

I have no idea about which file you are talking about. Please mention the full filename. --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

postazione Umarell Tjikko

hello, I'm the author. I'm Alessio Sarra, the person the articles talk about — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibralex (talk • contribs) 10:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you are the photographer or the mural-artist? In the latter case, please send an informal confirmation of that fact per email from your official email address to [email protected] (OTRS). The content of your email will not be made public, but can only be accessed by our OTRS-volunteers. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Frage zu Fotos

Hallo Turelio, danke erst mal für die schnelle Löschung eines Fotos vorgestern! Wenn ich richtig sehe, haben Sie alle anderen der hier unter diesem Link gelisteten Fotos als unklar markiert: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Queen+Barbie+Loge&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&advancedSearch-current=%7B%7D&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&ns106=1

Ich würde deren Löschung in 3 Tagen gern vermeiden, daher zur Info: die Mails a permissions-commons mit Bitte um Autorosierung der Fotos sind heute rausgegangen. Mfg, Tea0602 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tea0602 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hallo @Tea0602, du kannst bei all den Bildern, für die du eine Genehmigung veranlasst hast, folgenden Code einfügen: {{OTRS pending}} . Ich entferne dann das no-perm-tag. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Image deletion

Hey, I was wondering whether you could undelete the image that was located here - if it wasn't tagged as such, it was a political party logo and should have had the non-free logo tag. It should have looked like the leaf and text visible in the upper-left corner of this website --85.130.28.19 23:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bkaradzhov (?),

yes, it was identical to the appearance of the logo on the cited source-site. As this source-site is not released under a free license, all contents has to be considered copyrighted. One might discuss whether it reaches threshold of originality, but such discussions are complicated. However, if you want to go into such a discussion, I can temp-undelete ths image and put it into a regular deletion-request, which allows for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

??

I received notification for delectation yesterday at 20:00 then after 3 hour u deleted it. I don't have time to represent any Evidence that the source is reliable. Is that how wiki do business? Mojackjutaily (talk) 06:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

there is a misunderstanding on your side and a mistake on my side.

When a file is considered copyvio-suspected, a speedy/immediate deletion is appropriate and required (for legal reasons). If the uploader thinks the copyvio-suspicion is wrong, he/she has the possibility to either contact the deleting admin (as you did) or go to COM:UR, present his rationale and ask for undeletion.

My fault was to rely in this case solely on the copyvio-tagger, instead of checking which I normally do. I've undeleted the image now, performed a license-review, which should have been done immediately after upload, as its record would prevent such mistaggings. Sorry for my mistake. --Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Chin & Chilla, 1986.jpg - permission

Hi Túrelio, the author, Christian Zecha, has sent the permission mail to [email protected] on March 4th. I hope my picture (Chin & Chilla) will not be deleted today? Thank you! --Preschit (talk) 07:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Moin,

ok, hab den Baustein geändert. Da unsere OTRS-Leute, die solche Genehmigungen bearbeiten, seit langem überarbeitet sind und es deshalb etwas dauern (Monate, wenn man Pech hat) kann, ist es wichtig, denjenigen, der den Problem-Baustein gesetzt hat, möglichst sofort zu informieren, sobald die Genehmigungsmail abgeschickt ist. In diesem Fall war es ja noch gerade rechtzeitig. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright issue Lcbkl (talk) 20:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello!

I uploaded a file : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cho_Miyeon_from_(G)i-dle_in_March_2021.jpg and I saw that it was a copyright violation because of this "해당 콘텐츠는 상업적 목적으로 사용이 불가합니다." (this content cannot be used for commercial purposes), I didn't know using a photo for a Wikipedia header was a commercial use and I deeply apologize I didn't want to violate any copyright and if it does then my file should be deleted. If I want to upload another recent picture of Miyeon that doesn't violate any copyright, can I take a screenshot of a YouTube video from Mnet or another professional channel? Then should I upload it as a file that I own or not?

Thanks in advance for your reply,

Cordially — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcbkl (talk • contribs) 20:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Lcbkl,

per our policy all uploads to Commons need to be freely licensed also for commercial use. Whether Wikipedia itself is considered commercial or not, is not relevant here. So, by your upload itself you did not violatey copyright, but only our policy. Nevertheless, the image needs to be deleted. Whether you can upload a screenshot taken from a Youtube-video, depends on the licensing-terms of the video. Most material on Youtube has the "standard" license for Youtube and cannot be uploaded to Commons. However, a number of videos were released under a Creative-Commons license. You can recognize them by the words "creative Commons" in the video's description (usually you need to click on More)example. These can be uploaded to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Foto: Fallow deer - Albino

Hallo Túrelio,

I´m writing to you because I used your foto of an albino fallow deer (Bild: © Túrelio (via Wikimedia-Commons), 2006, CC BY-SA 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1633556) in a presentation for my pupils - and I read that you wanted to be notified when someone uses this Foto. Just as information: I am a Biology teacher and I teach in a school in Oldenburg in Holstein in north Germany (Holstein). Thank you for your work and for sharing it with the general public. Warm greetings, Miguel Goncalves — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.37.110.189 (talk) 11:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Danke für die Benachrichtigung. --Túrelio (talk) 11:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Erich Nelson

@Túrelio: Guten Abend Túrelio,
könntest Du bitte die hochgeladen Bilder dieses Users: [10] prüfen.
Ich halte diese Werke noch nicht frei von Urheberrechten.
Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Mal sehen, was dabei herauskommt. Aufgrund des Kontonamens wäre es denkbar, dass es mit der Nelson-Stiftung verbunden ist. --Túrelio (talk) 20:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

....vielen Dank. Ich bin auch gespannt, ob die Stiftung o.k. gibt. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 21:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Leere Kategorien

Moin Túrelio, zuerst vielen Dank für die prompte Erledigung meiner Schnelllöschanträge (bad name categories). Jetzt habe ich mal eine grundsätzliche Frage: Zurzeit gibt es einige IPs, die fast täglich Kategorien von abgewrackten Schiffen erstellen, von denen es gar kein Bild gibt. Kurzum, die Kategorien sind leer (siehe z. B. Category:Ships scrapped in Alang). Gibt es da eine Handhabe oder Policy, diese Kategorien schnell löschen zu können? Gruß von der Küste --Ein Dahmer (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Ein Dahmer,

gemäß unseren Lösch-Richtlinien ist eine leere Kategorie (sogar welche mit nur 1 Inhalt) ein Schnelllöschkandidat. Einfach {{speedydelete|C2}} einfügen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Danke, danach hatte ich gesucht! Da kommt jetzt Arbeit ... Gruß --Ein Dahmer (talk) 19:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Білий ворон (2021).jpg

Hi, you've deleted the first file I've uploaded. I HAVE THE PERMISSION to post it here, and the copyright holder has sent an email with all the details to [email protected]. So please don't delete it again, as it's totally legal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Марія Балабанов (talk • contribs)

Hi, the initial upload didn't have this information. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Wild Mouse (Flamingo Land) !.jpg

Hey! Could you please delete File:Wild Mouse (Flamingo Land) !.jpg, because I made a mistake? - Wacky Windjammer

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Gemma Collins 2021 headshot.jpg

Hi, I noticed that you tagged File:Gemma Collins 2021 headshot.jpg as a copyvio earlier this month. I started a deletion request since it had all the red flags of Flickrwashing, but wondering if you could provide some info, since a reverse image search didn't yield any results. Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ytoyoda,

the nominator hadn't provided any evidence. However, the metadata stated "screenshot". That was likely my rationale, if I remember correctly. As it is not the most solid evidence, a regular DR is appropriate IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 16:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of Peruvian commemorate coins

Hi, Your bot deleted nearly all the photos I made and published of Peruvian commemorative coins. I am referring my work to the Wikipedia page of German commemorative coins. The German government obviously has no problem publishing fotos of commemorative coins. I am very sorry that the Peruvian BCRP is more restrictive than the German government and I hope you checked this fact briefly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BennoBu (talk • contribs)

Löschen alter Bildversionen

Hallo, ich bin mir gerade unsicher über die Vorgehensweise: Könnten die älteren Bildversionen hier Category:Pipe organ of Kirche Mutter vom Guten Rat (Frankfurt am Main) ausnahmsweise gelöscht werden? Die hatte ich sowieso nur zwecks Bearbeitung durch andere hochgeladen und nun der Einfachhheit halber teils mit anderen Inhalten überschrieben. Es gibt auch öfter (Cache-?)Probleme mit der Anzeige, das stört. Danke! --Subbass1 (talk) 11:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Subbass1, damit ich das richtig verstehe: es geht um all die Dateien, bei denen du die ursprüngliche Version mit einer anderen Version überschrieben hast, ja? Und du möchtest nur die "alte" Version "versionsgelöscht" haben oder die ganze Datei? Möglich ist hier übrigens beides, da sämtliche Dateien für G7-Speedy infrage kommen. --Túrelio (talk) 11:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Nur die jew. alten Versionen bitte löschen (wenn es welche gibt). Ja, das "speedy" habe ich gerad erst richtig verstanden (und Du hast prompt reagiert). Danke und Grüße --Subbass1 (talk) 15:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Danke! Letzte Bitte: hier auch die alte Version löschen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rottenburg_(Neckar),_St._Moriz,_Orgel_(5).jpg --Subbass1 (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Lambis lilikae

Bonjour Túrelio, Pourquoi me dîtes-vous que la photo sur Lambis lilikae ne respecte pas les droits d'auteurs alors qu'elle est sous licence libre ? Cordialement--D24S092008 (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @D24S092008, ähem, I cannot see any free license on https://www.forumcoquillages.com/t19225-lambis-lilikae-villar-2016. Or are you Picardo Villar? --Túrelio (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

nochmal alte Version

Hallo, sorry, eins war mir noch durchgerutscht, bitte alte Version löschen (wirklich störend, wenn nach Klick aufs Vorschaubild diese alte Version kommt, ist das wirklich ein lokales Cacheproblem und nicht vielleicht ein Bug?): https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winfried_Albiez#/media/Datei%3AKrauchenwies%2C_St._Laurentius%2C_Orgel_(11).jpg Künftig werde ich an speedydelete denken... --Subbass1 (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Das ist fast immer ein Cache-Problem.--Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

User uploading a significant amount of probably copyvios

Hey, I noticed you deleted my recent speedy deletion nomination, so I'd kindly request you look at that user's other contributions. From what I can tell, every one is a probable copyvio incorrectly marked as "own work". Thanks for your help! Elli (talk) 09:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Screenshot of suspended account realDonaldTrump on Twitter 2020-01-09.png

Why did you replace the previously uploaded file (original screenshot) with the one uploaded later (third party post-processed screenshot)? Here is the original resolution. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

• In addition, the second file has a fake date in the title. Source article was published Jan. 16, 2021. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:30, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

I fell for the nominating user. Reverted now. --Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you! --sasha (krassotkin) 12:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Wade Poster.jpg

Hi Turelio, can you please undelete this image temporarily? I'm going to transfer it to enwiki, since the article where this poster was used is now approved for mainspace. Thanks, pandakekok9 04:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @pandakekok9,

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, please redelete. :) pandakekok9 03:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Bikaji Logo.png

On File:Bikaji Logo.png you rejected the G10 nomination with "image is in use on a project". If it was it isn't any more. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 13:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Bitte um Umbenennung

Hallo @Túrelio: ,
bei der Aufarbeitung der Humboldtfotos habe ich was verwechselt, 29 Bilder in der inzwischen korrekt umbenannten Chan Chan Kategorie laufen fälschlicherweise unter "Vichama-Kultur", beim ersten Foto habe ich schon eine Verschiebung zu "Chimú in Chan Chan 01" beantragt. Gibt es ein Tool, um die 28 anderen umzubenennen, mit dem ich das vielleicht selber machen könnte? Und noch was: Die Kategorien für die Einzelthemen der Humboldttour habe ich jetzt mit dem Datum vorne benannt, so wie wir das früher bei den WAF-Exkursionen praktiziert haben. Dazu setze ich jeweils noch die Themenkategorie wie bei wie bei den umzubenennenden Bildern "Chan Chan". Sollen die Datumskategorien mit hidden versehen werden. Cat a lot ist mir inzwischen geläufig, dank TKarcher, der mir das beigebracht hat. Vielen Dank und herzliche Grüße aus München --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 16:56, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

@Pimpinellus Könnte ich mit User:Perhelion/massrename.js erledigen. Ansonsten könntest du eventuell COM:Filemover-Rechte beantragen, um das in Zukunft selbst klären zu können. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Vielen Dank 1234qwer1234qwer4 für die Informationen, ich werde gelegentlich mal versuchen, die Filemover-Rechte zu erlangen. Da ich bei den Commonsrules nicht so versiert bin, wäre dennoch gut, wenn jemand auf meine Aktionen weiterhin ein aufmerksames, wohlwollendes Auge hätte. Grüße aus München --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 06:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

@Pimpinellus Alles klar. Habe die Dateien mal selbst verschoben. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:30, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For quickly cleaning up things I tag with speedy deletion, thank you! Elli (talk) 08:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

bogeyvisit

Hello Túrelio, Today, you deleted the picture File:Frédéric_Fréry_en_mars_2020.jpg However, there is no copyright violation with this picture: it is fully free of rights, and this is the reason why the website https://www.premium-communication.fr/conferenciers/inno is using it. Please undelete this picture and restore it on the Frédéric Fréry Wikipédia page: there is no reason to delete it from Wikimedia Commons. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.94.185.105 (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Unknown,

problem is that this image is just a b/w version of the image File:Frédéric Fréry.jpg, which was dealt with in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frédéric Fréry.jpg. So, we still need a permission by author Wojciech WOJCIK. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

Thank you for your prompt answer. I confirm that author Wojciech WOJCIK sent a permission to [email protected] on September 24, 2020.

Can you check this mailbox and restore the image? Thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.94.185.105 (talk) 08:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I can't check that by myself as I have no access for that. But I've asked at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Now we have an answer; see Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Permission_by_Wojciech_WOJCIK_for_File:Frédéric_Fréry.jpg_?. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

Thank you for your answer. Can you tell me what is a « completed permission statement » and where it must be sent ? I will transmit this to the author, Wojciech WOJCIK. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB09:8047:C7F:9079:1771:7C95:D39C (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, better you contact directly the OTRS-volunteer, who answered this question (linked above). I am not on OTRS and have no access. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Stop remove my image

Im owner ExtremeOnly its this is my image i create this

https://i.imgur.com/0uGF51A.png https://i.imgur.com/gzwtAWC.png https://i.imgur.com/RfLS89V.png The author of the background of the logo has agreed to share it, if I do not make money on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zabujca997 (talk • contribs) 11:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

For my serwer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zabujca997 (talk • contribs) 11:51, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Just some facts:

1) I have not removed "your" image File:ExtremeOnly HL2RP.png (next time provide the filename), but tagged it as copyvio-suspected.

2) Your above statement confirms the suspicion that you are not the author of the main image (background).

3) Per our licensing-policy, uploads to Commons need to be free also for commercial use, which had been forbidden by the true author.

4) The CC-BY-SA license, under which you uploaded this image, does expressedly allow commercial use, which is in contradiction to your said own permission.

So, if you still want to "share" this image, including for commercial use by others, you need to ask the original author of the background-image to confirm the choosen license (CC-BY-SA) per direct email (not forwarded) to [email protected] . --Túrelio (talk) 13:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:ExtremeOnly HL2RP.png

If this is simple enough for a speedy deletion, then I'm happy with that. But as it seems to be challenged, I've filed a DR too. Any discussion that's needed belongs there. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:46, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

No problem with that. I've removed the speedy-tag. --Túrelio (talk) 14:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Yuri Semerenko.jpg

Hey Túrelio, you have deleted a File:Yuri Semerenko.jpg for Copyright violation. But in this photo I am myself and all rights to this image belong to me. This image is used by me on my facebook page https://www.facebook.com/yuri.semerenko/. YUS2017 (talk) 22:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi YUS2017,

ok. Problem is that metadata state (с) Makhanov Oleksander. So, the best solution would be if Mr. Oleksander could send a confirmation (to [email protected]) of the free license under which you uploaded this image to Commons. 2nd best solution might be if you send from your official email address a confirmation that you are the rightsholder, if you are, and that you want to release it under the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

SINC

Saludos Túrelio.
File:Almoloya Diadema.jpg
File:Almoloya Vaso.jpg
File:Almoloya Urna.jpg

In the page SINC
Abajo, en el pie de página se puede leer:
In the end of page you can read:

Creative Commons 4.0 Puedes copiar, difundir y transformar los contenidos de SINC. Lee las condiciones de nuestra licencia.

El contenido es CC, incluye imágenes. All the content is CC.
Sanador2.0 (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Greetings, Túrelio. I am the user who has reported in the last hours the files that Sanador2.0 is citing, along with other uploaded by other users. In this case, it seems that I have made the mistake of indicating as copyvio files that, according to the web page where they were originally hosted, have a compatible license. I translate the notice for you:

Most of the contents of agenciasinc.es are published under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license, which allows copying, distributing, publicly communicating and transforming said contents, including for commercial purposes, with the following conditions:

• Cite SINC as a source in the case of content signed by SINC.
• Cite SINC and the author of the work in the case of content signed by an author.
• If the contents are broadcasted through the internet, they must be linked to our website (agenciesinc.es).

The use of the contents under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license does not allow, in any case, the exploitation, whether or not for commercial purposes, of the contents of SINC for the creation of publications, in any medium, when they are mainly composed of contents of agenciesinc.es.

Agenciesinc.es may link photographic, graphic or audiovisual material from various sources with a CC license different from that of the content produced by SINC. The type of use of said material will be subject to the license signed by the source.

The CC 4.0 license does not apply to textual, audiovisual or graphic content published by agenciesinc.es from other information agencies. All rights to these contents are reserved to their owner and, therefore, they may not be reproduced, distributed, transformed or publicly communicated without the consent of their owner. Agenciesinc.es will exonerate itself from the responsibility for the improper use of said contents that is made by third parties.

Agenciesinc.es may take the appropriate legal actions for the improper use that is made of the published content in contravention of all the provisions above.

-- P4K1T0 (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hola @Sanador2.0 and @P4K1T0,

before I performed the deletion, I had actually visited the source-site and read the comment on licensing, which is rather confusing, as they seaem to exclude commercial use, which is allowed per the CC-BY license. I will undelete the files and put them into a regular (slow) DR, which gives space and time for discussion, which seems to be necessary IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Prince418

Hi. You have already deleted, as have done other admins before, several uploads by this user. I understand they have no interest in contributing positively to Commons. Why don't you simply delete all their junk uploads and give them a warning? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 20:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you very much. Can you also close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portrait Picture of Ozge Sezince Varley.jpg please? The hubby understood there is no need to remove the pic. (Look at its TP also, bitte.) --E4024 (talk) 21:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hello, Túrelio,

I saw you on the recently active admins list and was hoping that this deletion request could be addressed sooner rather than later. Thank you. Liz (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Already performed by my colleague 4nn1l2. --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Photo enquiry https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MotherTeresa_090.jpg

Dear Turelio, I am an English language professor at the Moscow State University of Foreign Relations. We would like to use the photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MotherTeresa_090.jpg in the coursebook we are writing now, in the section about the leaders that have changed the world. Could we possibly do it? Looking forward to your reply. Best regards, Tatiana — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 5.181.211.254 (talk) 08:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear Tatiana,

sure. Just try to credit it properly. If space is limited, "© 1986 Túrelio" would be sufficient. Thanks for notifying. If your book is regularly published (externally), I would be glad to get its title. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

File:CB logo.png

Hi,

I don’t think this logo is above COM:TOO, I think a regular DR should be started instead and the CC template replaced by {{PD-textlogo}}. This Japanese IP address is known for making bogus speedy requests (see [11][12][13], etc. I’ll try to make a list).

Regards. --Thibaut (talk) 11:40, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. I've restored the file and put it into Commons:Deletion requests/File:CB logo.png for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I created a page for this LTA, if you see them again, don't hesitate to add their IP in the list.

Could I ask you to restore all the files listed here? He's a known youtuber in Japan and I checked all the videos, they're all {{YouTube CC-BY}}, the LTA seems to dislike this youtuber for some reason. I think the speedy template should be either removed or converted to a regular DR.

Thanks! --Thibaut (talk) 18:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Logo Garoa - license fixed

Ni! Hello Túrelio. Thanks for noting that there was an inconsistency between the page I was basing my request on (<https://garoa.net.br/wiki/Manual_de_Identidade>) and the one you had been considering (<https://garoa.net.br/wiki/Logotipos>). It's been fixed now and we're grateful for that. Shall we bring back the logo at File:Logo_GaroaHC_verde.png now? All the best, --Solstag (talk) 22:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Solstag, I've undeleted the file. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Homo naledi holotype specimen (DH1).jpg

Hello Túrelio. I noticed you deleted File:Homo naledi holotype specimen (DH1).jpg with the rationale Copyright violation: © 2015, Berger et al. However, the source indicated clearly states This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License... Could you please revert your deletion? AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done. They have hidden it really at the end. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Bin gut drauf und schick dir jetzt ein Kätzchen! Ach ja, bleib gesund!

RealAppleFreak (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind looking at File:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg? I think it's a reupload of a file you deleted on February 19, 2021. This latest version is now at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg and there is a post by the uploader at File talk:Johnny McGhee Trumpeter.jpg. I came across this file via en:WP:THQ#Johnny Mcghee where the uploader was asking about it at the English Wikipedia Teahouse. For what it's worth, I think the uploader means well, but perhaps might be getting some bad advice. She states she asked a lawyer about the photo, but I wouldn't have too much confidence in any lawyer who says or implies that photographing someone else's creative work means there's been a transfer of copyright. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Sofia-bohdanowicz-viennale-2020.jpg

Hallo Túrelio, der o.g. Deletion request läuft jetzt schon seit Januar. Meinst du, man könnte das Bild nun löschen? Die abgebildete Person hat sich bei mir wieder gemeldet und gefragt, warum das Bild noch da ist. Eigentlich gibt's doch keinen Grund...? Das Bild braucht ja niemand, die abgebildete Person möchte es gelöscht haben, ich als Fotografin bin auch dafür, und niemand hat gegen den Löschantrag Einspruch erhoben. Gruß von Kaethe17 (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Flying_dodo_brewery_inside.jpg

Hi Túrelio! You deleted this picture because CambridgeBayWeather inititally thought it belonged to a lady who credited her name to it on an article on Metro. Here is the link: https://metro.co.uk/2018/03/11/mauritius-at-50-25-things-to-see-and-do-while-youre-on-the-indian-ocean-island-7372334/. But As I explained to him, I gave this picture to the brewery back in 2016. The same picture I uploaded on wikipedia. You can see that the logo on the picture is an actual signage that is on the bar. The brewery rightfully used this picture and edited the logo to make it more apparent and even added another higher up. They posted it on their website: http://www.flyingdodo.com/flying_dodo_1.jpg. The journalist of Metro used this picture for her article and put her name on it. My version is therefore the original. I would greatly appreciate if you could put it back. Thanks! --Mauritianbeerguy (talk) 09:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Wow, what a chain of events. But, why do you let Stephanie Takyi commit copyfraud and credit the image to herself? Are you aware that in some legislation this might result in loosing your ability to pursue illegal uses of this image? As you by yourself credited your upload to "Amaury Bouchet", I will not publicly ask you whether you are indeed Amaury Bouchet. However, as a confirmation I would ask you to declare that towards [email protected] (OTRS). This way it will not "compromise" your username, as OTRS-people are bound to confidentiality. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Túrelio To be honest I only saw it now that she took credit for it when CambridgeBayWeather tagged it. I will for sure contact metro. thank you! --Mauritianbeerguy (talk) 06:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Neitengrad aturschutzgebiet uphof.JPG

Hallo Dombrese, bei letztgenannten Foto hast du "M.Listander_Lachetta" als Autor eingetragen. Es scheint also nicht dein Werk zu sein oder was? --Túrelio (Diskussion) 09:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Hallo es ist mein Foto. Grüsse M.Listander -Lachetta (Dombrese). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dombrese (talk • contribs) 11:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

@Dombrese, ok. Jetzt fehlt aber immer noch ein Lizenzbaustein. Und sich selbst als Autor gibt man so ein: User:Dombrese . --Túrelio (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the deletion

We apologize for any inconvenience caused by posting images that violate the rules. Thank you for this time.––わーい123 (talk) 00:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

No problem. You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 11:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Sobre el uso del Escudo del Huila

Hola, Túrelio He subido una nueva versión del escudo del Huila (en Colombia), que conozco por nacimiento. Como verás, la versión de 2010 no se parece en mucho a la versión oficial, como podrás comprobar en varios enlaces como el de la Gobernación, el de los símbolos del Departamento, y otras versiones (1) (2) que se han intentado publicar en Wikipedia. Te agradezco puedas ayudarnos a conservar este nuevo archivo SVG e, incluso, si puedes, ayudarnos a borrar las versiones anteriores, que son imprecisas en su apariencia heráldica y representativa del Departamento del Huila.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jose Collazos (talk • contribs) 13:59, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

special:diff/550730164

Why does this file not qualify for G7? The uploader wanted it deleted. --Wcam (talk) 20:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

As the code already suggests, G7-speedy is allowed for 7 days after upload. The image was uploaded in 2019. Besides, there was already a regular DR going on. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks a lot for your deletions! :)

Sannita (WMIT) (talk) 20:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Vista panoramica lde la Ciudad de Danlí.jpg

Hola Tulio mucho gusto saludarte. Estoy con mucha duda, porque simpre que subo una fotografia la borras? Siempre que subo una foto, esa es de mi procedencia no e violado derechos de autor de nadie ni lo are pero simpre que subo una foto es tomada de mi propia cama o sino con permisos de el dueño como lo era File:Vista panoramica de la Ciudad de Danlí.jpg bueno a lo que bengo es a preguntar porque siempre borras la foto que subo te agradeceria muchisimo si me lo aclararas, saludos.😁 Fernan bth (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

I write to you in Spanish ayudeme porfabor Fernan bth (talk) 21:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hola @Fernan bth,

File:Ciudad de Danlí Honduras.jpg had been tagged by User:Rodrigobaaz as copyvio-suspected, as it was found at https://posicinamientoweb.pro/photo-collection/secretaria-de-salud-honduras-wikipedia.

File:Vista panorámica de la Ciudad de Danlí.jpg had been tagged by User:Rodrigobaaz as copyvio-suspected, as it was found at https://www.top-rated.online/cities/El+Para%C3%ADso/place/p/3411983/Cerro+La+Cruz.

If you prefer a discussion of the issue, I can put the in a regular DR, tomorrow, as I'm to bed now. --Túrelio (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

La fotografia que subi no es la que sale en ..secretaria de salud honduras.. ay muchas que se parecen que an sido tomadas en el mismo lugar ..cerro la cruz.. Bueno entonces que puedo aser para recuperarla o volverla a subir sin que sea borrada denuevo. gracias por la antencion. Fernan bth (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

HI,

I've undeleted the images and put them into a regular DR to allow for discussion; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ciudad de Danlí Honduras.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vista panorámica de la Ciudad de Danlí.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Muchas gracias por recuperarla una pregunta mas ¿se puede asegurar que no bolvera a borrar por accidente?. Fernan bth (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, "will not be erased by accident?" Usually nothing here is deleted by accident, but after an administrator made a decision based on the available evidence and his experience. Of course, we admins are humans and can err. But that's not a big problem, as any deletion can easily be reverted, as you have seen in your case.

However, please remember that your 2 images are now in a regular (slow) deletion-request. In order to have them kept, you need to present your arguments/evidence against the presented deletion-rationale in the deletion-discussion, as linked above. --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok entiendo. Lo que paso esque marcaron la foto para su eliminacion porque se parese a la que sale en en https://www.top-rated.online/cities/El+Para%C3%ADso/ lugar / p / 3411983 / Cerro + La + Cruz Pero no es la mima, si ve la que subi yo fue tomada en invierno sale mas verde todo y a mas altura, y con mas color, que la que fue confundida con la mia. lo que pasa esque fue tomada en el mismo lugar que se yama serro la cruz es un monumento muy popular de mi ciudad. Debo de ablar que es nasesario volver a ponerla en la pagina Danlí ya que no sale niuna panoramica que se vea garn parate de la ciudad como lo es la que subi. Gracias por su comprecion. Fernan bth (talk) 15:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Please put all your arguments on the above linked DR-pages. So far, you have not done that. My talkpage is the wrong place for that. And I will not decide these requests, as i have opened them. --Túrelio (talk) 18:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Question

Greetings! You have blocked my files. I sent a copyright confirmation email ([email protected]) . But I can't get files and account recovery https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Media-17 How can I restore my account? I see only your complaints, after which the bot deleted the files and blocked my account. Therefore, I am writing to you in order to understand how I can recover files

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Media-17#top --Media-17 (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Media-17,

your account on Commons is not blocked. (Most of) Your uploads were deleted for being suspected of license-laundering on Flickr, as they were uploaded to Commons the same day as to Flickr. If you sent a "copyright confirmation" to [email protected] (OTRS), an OTRS-volunteer will evaluate the permission and eventually confirm it. Then these uploads can be undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

copy vio

i don't know anything about copyright and such. I wanted to use an image for my userbox, however all of the images were massive and looked terrible. the original image, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TigerITankTunis.jpg, has no copyright, I assumed I could make a smaller copy more reasonable for a userbox. please help. KommanderC (talk) 15:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi KommanderC,

well, editing on Wikipedia and/or uploading to Commons "without knowing know anything about copyright" is not really wise. You need to learn at least the basics.

Your upload File:Tiger 1 tank for userbox.jpg has been deleted, as you claimed it as own work, which obviously it is not. It would have been sufficient to put File:TigerITankTunis.jpg into the source-entry.

A similar problem has your upload File:KV-2-2-2-2-2-2-2.png, which is likely also not your own work, even though you have eventually photoshopped it. You always have to credit the source.

However, back to your File:Tiger 1 tank for userbox.jpg: it would likely also have been deleted, if we had known the source-image, as it was simple an identical duplicate. AFAIK, even though File:TigerITankTunis.jpg seems to be big, you can control the size that is actually shown in a MediaWiki-project, by adding the proper format-code. You need to ask that on the project where you want to use it. --Túrelio (talk) 17:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

I added the link to the kv-2 thing. please fix it. I never really wanted to use commons anyway. If there was a way to upload your own files directly to wikipedia I would do that. It also would be nice if you were to notify me instead of straight up deleting the file. KommanderC (talk) 19:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

That source doesn't help, as there is no evidence of a free license; just the statement "© 2021 Tank Encyclopedia".

Notifying you about the problem-tagging is the job of the tagger, which wasn't me. --Túrelio (talk) 19:42, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Review please

Hello Túrelio, I have uploaded this image of the new year in Times Square in 2021 but I have doubts, is the censorship that I did in the upper part correct or do you want me to also censor the lower part? Because at the bottom where it says "HAPPY NEW YEAR" I can't tell if it's an image or just letters, you know more, could you help me and check it please? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kia_New_Year_in_Times_Square.jpg --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 18:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

• @Túrelio: and also review it please?--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 18:17, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Aurelio, I see no problem with the image. You might eventually add a note that you redacted it slightly to avoid any thinkable copyright-infringement. --Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

• @Túrelio: Oh thanks--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
• @Túrelio: Thank you for reviewing my image, how do I add the note and what information do you have?--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

HI, you could put it into the description-entry "other versions=". Just use plain text. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

• @Túrelio: Oh thank you--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 19:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Suppression de photo suite à erreur de copyright.

Bonjour, Je suis un employé de l'organisation du Trophée Andros, course automobile sur glace, et suis en cours de mise à jour sur les pages de nos plus illustres participants, en y ajoutant des informations sur leur venue à notre événement. Agissant en tant que graphiste, j'ajoute également des photos de notre banque d'image, pour illustrer notre propos. Ces photos sont la propriété du Trophée Andros, celui-ci ayant signé un contrat avec ces auteurs pour en acquérir les droits d'utilisation. Je vous remercie pour votre travail de surveillance des utilisation des droits, mais comment dois-je noter ces renseignements lors du téléversement des images ? Et ne pensez-vous pas qu'il serait plus courtois de signaler l'abus à la personne avant de supprimer en quelques clics une matinée de recherche et de travail ? D'avance merci pour votre retour. Thibault Messiaen (talk) 12:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC) Thibault MESSIAEN, graphiste chez 2MO/BICEPS S.A., créateur et organisateur du Trophée Andros depuis 1990, dirigé par Max Mamers.

Ähem, you were notified about the copyright-problem on your talkpage User talk:Thibault Messiaen. It was definitively not o.k. to claim photographies as own work, which were shot by other people, even if you had their permission.

Now, how to proceed? If "Trophée Andros" indeed has obtained full copyright from all these photographers to release their photos under the choosen free license, which also allows commercial re-use (!), then they need to issue a formal statement from their official email address to [email protected] (OTRS), in which they declare for each of the concerned photographies (use the filenames from Commons) that they have obtained enough copyright from the respective photographer to release it under the choosen CC-BY-SA license. The OTRS-volunteers, who process such emails/permissions, will then evaluate whether they accept that statement or request a confirmation from the photographers. I am not involved in that process. When they give their o.k. for the permission, the images can immediately be undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 18:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Vendingmachinesg.jpg and related

Hi Túrelio, I cannot access File:Vendingmachinesg.jpg which you recently deleted, but I suspect the uploader was part of a prolific sock farm that has uploaded a variety of copyrighted images. Some have been deleted already, but a few others can be found at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cestush. I'm unsure if there is a centralised commons process for these sorts of situations, but at the least perhaps you could handle the images on that deletion request? Best, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

uploader was Cata Sqip and this was his only upload. Out of this DR I could identify 4 as likely copyvios and speedy-tagged them. However, for the others, I found no evidence. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! As it's all the same person with a history of copyright violation, my presumption at this point is to presume they're not own work, but at least that's four fewer copyright violations. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 11:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Isabelle Pilloud.jpg

Hallo Túrelio, Sie haben das Foto (File:Isabelle Pilloud.jpg) gesperrt. Soweit ich verstehe, lautet die Begründung Verletzung des Urheberrechts. Die auf dem Foto abgebildete Person ist Isabelle Pilloud. Über diese Künstlerin existieren Wikipedia-Seiten (de:Isabelle Pilloud + fr:Isabelle Pilloud), die ich mit anderen Editoren zusammen editiert habe. Nun ist das Foto, das von Isabelle Pilloud selbst erstellt und hochgeladen (user:Ellebasip) wurde, gesperrt. Was muss unternommen werden, damit dieses Foto nicht als illegale Kopie, sondern als von der Rechteinhaberin hochgeladenes Foto unter Commons Creative-Lizenz wieder freigeschaltet wird? Danke für Ihre Unterstützung. Matutinho 06:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Matutunho,

es wurde gelöscht (nicht gesperrt), weil es unter URV-Verdacht gekommen ist, da es auf https://www.fr.ch/mahf/actualites/livre-heroines-isabelle-pilloud gefunden wurde und dort unter © Tous droits réservés steht. Dass Ellebasip die Abgebildete selbst ist, konnte ich natürlich nicht wissen. Wenn du mit ihr in Kontakt stehst, dann bitte sie von ihrer offiziellen Emailadresse eine Bestätigung an [email protected] (OTRS) zu senden, in der sie bestätigt (Sprache beliebig), 1) dass sie das Foto selbst aufgenommen hat (wenn das wirklich stimmt), und 2) dass sie es unter der gewählten CC-Lizenz freigeben möchte. Falls es dagegen von einem Fotografen aufgenommen wurde, müsste dieser eine Bestätigung der freien Lizenz an OTRS schicken. Sobald ihre Email unterwegs ist, kannst du mir Bescheid geben, dann entlösche ich das Foto. --Túrelio (talk) 06:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio,

danke für die erhellende Erklärung. Jetzt verstehe ich das Problem viel besser und glaube, dass ich zur Lösung beitragen kann. --Matutinho 07:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio,

Inzwischen hat Isabelle Pilloud das Mail an [email protected] geschickt mit dem erforderlichen Inhalt bezüglich Identität und CC-Lizenz. Halt mich bitte auf dem Laufenden, sollte noch etwas nachgereicht werden. Und ganz herzlichen Dank für deine Hilfe. --Matutinho 15:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

OK, ich habe das Bild wiederhergestellt. Am Genehmigungsprozess bin ich nicht beteiligt. Die OTRS-Bearbeiter sind eine geschlossene Gruppe. Wenn etwas fehlen sollte, werden sie sich aber beim Versender der Genehmigung melden. --Túrelio (talk) 15:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Noch zu meinen eigenen hochgeladenen Bildern (also nicht file:Isabelle Pilloud.jpg). Bisher musste ich keine solche Bestätigung für meine eigenen Fotos senden. Meine Fotos sind "own work" und natürlich mit einer CC-Lizenz hochgeladen. Müsste ich auch eine Mail-Bestätigung [email protected] beim Hochladen eigener Fotos senden? -- Matutinho 16:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Nein, natürlich nicht. Nur wenn der Verdacht aufkommt, dass ein Foto nicht vom Hochlader selbst aufgenommen wurde, ist eine solche Bestätigung nötig.

Diese "Musikinstrumente" vom Sinn- und Klangweg in Büdingen sind dort dauerhaft aufgestellt, ja? (Ich frage das, weil für die Panoramafreiheit i.a. eine dauerhafte Installation erforderlich ist) --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Ja, die Sinn- und Klangobjekte stehen schon seit Jahren da. Natürlich muss auch mal eines repariert oder ersetzt werden. Es handelt sich nicht um eine befristete Ausstellung; der Sinn- und Klangweg ist vom Düdinger Tourismus portiert und befindet sich auf öffentlich zugänglichem Gelände. --@Matutinho Matutinho 19:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Kizuna AI 新種のSCPが怖すぎる件【SCP Foundation】.webm

Hello, Túrelio. File:Kizuna AI: A new kind of SCP is too scary 【SCP Foundation】.webm is released by the author under CC BY-SA 3.0（in Japanese: "※この動画はクリエイティブコモンズ　表示-継承3.0ライセンス(略して、CC BY-SA 3.0)で公開されています。", in English: "This video is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license (CC BY-SA 3.0 for short)."）. I want this file to be restored to its original state as soon as possible. Thank you. --組曲師 (talk) 10:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Additional information: User:Techyan, the administrator, has done the same thing with other files. Please, just do it. --組曲師 (talk) 10:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi 組曲師|組曲師,

the deletion-rationale was "The video itself is a copyright violation for splicing a significant amount of Kizuna Ai footage without apparent permission. It's far from de minimis". So, this isn't changed by a seemingly proper license on YT. Anyway, I will undelete the file and put into a regular DR to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 12:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

About deleting my work.

Hey!

My name is Betar!

You have recently deleted my work, because of a picture that I took of "Oliver C Beats", but you have boldly stated that it was from SoundCloud, if you would have paid closer attention to the details of the portrait that I've uploaded, you would have made out the differences, and would have known that it isn't compressed. Also the picture on SoundCloud of Oliver C Beats, is up there because I've granted him the right to use it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betar2000 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

assuming that you are talking about File:Oliver C Beats's Portrait.png: I did visually compare your upload and the soundcloud-hit then and now again, and I don't see any difference. Therefore, please take this to Commons:Undeletion requests, where an undeletion can be discussed, independant of me. --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

File history deletion

Hi, thanks for deleting the uncropped version of File:League of Legends Cosplay by Elementalist Lux 05.jpg. However, would you be able to RevDel it instead of outright deleting it (like here)? I have concerns that the original author may not get attribution for the image because the file history doesn't include them (despite what the author table says). Regards, Anarchyte (work | talk) 17:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:13, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

questions from an old fan

I am going to need a cat deleted, but it needs to be emptied, etc.

I have a question about it though. I thought that we (me or anybody) are unable to make category names with a "/" in it. See Category:Bentley's Miscellany, Vol. 4/Number 23.

It was my intention that all of the issues be subcatted, so I have messed up a few volumes ago, but this name perplexes me.

Thanks for this time and all the other.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 00:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi RaboKarbakian,

I am surprized too that sucha cat-name was possible. If I understand you correctly, you want Category:Bentley's Miscellany, Vol. 4/Number 23 to be deleted and replaced by Category:Bentley's Miscellany, Vol. 4, Number 23, right? --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Maybe the rule is just at the uploader for filenames.... These mistakes for me happen when the day is too young or too old. An experienced (A) should be good for the occassional wtf moments! And that at least went as expected!--RaboKarbakian (talk) 12:44, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Recalbox logo.svg

Hi Túrelio,

kannst du die Datei File:Recalbox logo.svg [14] wiederherstellen?

Du warst schneller mit löschen, als ich mit editieren... :(

SVG ist aus einem MIT lizenzierten Projekt.

Jetzt ist das eine leere Seite ohne Bild...

--Laserlicht (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Files from U.S. Embassy Jerusalem Flickr stream

Hello Túrelio,

You have speedy deleted files from U.S. Embassy Jerusalem Flickr stream with the rational "© Mati Milstein, not works from the US Government)". In my opinion it worths at least regular DR. Anyway see for example File:Olympic Purim Party (5549079275).jpg. it's from the British Embassy Israel Flickr stream CC-BY-2.0. The EXIF says Copyright - (C) 2011 Mati Milstein. His linkedin says that he was Official Photographer ot the British Embassy Tel Aviv. So this file should be deleted also. -- Geagea (talk) 20:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Geagea,

no problem with a DR, despite the amount of click-work it will produce for me.

Could you check whether there is any hint that he was also official photographer of the US Embassy? I went to speedy in this case, as we know that US institutions tend to distribute other people's work. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

No, it's not written but it look like a work for U.S. embassy. Why we should doubt U.S. Embassy license. -- Geagea (talk) 20:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Because US Federal government works, which fall under the US Gov PD clause, are usually expressedly labeled as such in their metadata. Anyway, here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robert C. O'Brien visit to Israel, December 2020 01.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you and sorry for the bother. -- Geagea (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Frank Cipolla

Please check images being added to Draft:Frank Cipolla at Wikipedia. The creating editor restored images you tagged a copyright infringement, and has added others that clearly are not "own work." David notMD (talk) 09:58, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Files_for_SVG_benchmark

Danke für deine fleißigen Bearbeitung als Admin (da könnte ich mir eine Scheibe abschneiden).

Auf Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Files_for_SVG_benchmark habe ich eine Wiederherstell-Anfrage zweier "Duplikate" angefragt die für einen SVG Benchmark für phab:T40010 benötigt wird. Da die gleiche SVG-datei von verschiedenen Bibliotheken als PNG gerendert werden, schauen sie auch ähnlich aus und wurden von User_talk:A1Cafel#Files for SVG benchmark als {{Duplicate}} gemeldet, jedoch haben diese unterschiedliche Bugs/Ungenauigkeiten die für ein normales Bild unerheblich wären, aber für einen Benchmark eben nicht, die genauen Unterschiede sind auf File_talk:Mahuri_batik.png sowie auf File_talk:Mahuri_librsvg.png genannt. In beiden Fällen wurde auch das mMn jeweils schlechtere Bild behalten. Gemäß dem Vorschlag von @Nat: mag ich dich fragen ob das in Ordnung geht, wenn die beiden Dateien wiederhergestellt werden.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Natürlich, kein Problem. --Túrelio (talk) 19:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

 Done Danke  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 14:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Tonton Bicha aka Daniel Fils Aime

Hello,

Noticed you deleted the picture of Tonton Bicha that I uploaded that was on his Youtube channel and Facebook page. I have the subject's authorization to use this picture of him, as well as the photographer's information include the country and date this picture was taken. Can you please undelete this picture. I want to use it for his Wikipedia entry. Thanks.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:%22Tonton_Bicha%22_aka_Daniel_Fils_Aime.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

Amazone55 (talk) 21:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC) Amazone55 4/23/21

Hi Amazone55,

we accept only verifiable permissions. If Daniel Fils Aimee is the photographer and rightsholder, he needs to send an email from his official /business email address to [email protected] confirming that he is the photographer and that he wants to release this image under a Commons-compliant free license, such as CC-BY-SA 2.0[15] (you did actually not add any license to your upload). You need to be aware that a "permission for Wikipedia (only)" is not acceptable. So, you should talk again to the photographer. After he has send his permission, drop me a note and I will conditionally undelete your upload. --Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Barlas borjigin 3.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind taking a look at File:Barlas borjigin 3.jpg? You deleted a file by the same name on January 14, 2021. In fact, a file with this same name has been actually deleted three times before: the aforementioned time by you, once on January 5, 2021, by Nick; and once again by you on December 23, 2020. Three different accounts have reuploaded the file each time it's been deleted; so, if it's the same file being deleted each time, then there's a good chance it's also the same person trying to use multiple accounts to upload the file. The latest account Imperialreal has also uploaded other similar files as well that might need a closer examination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. Yes, likely Imperialreal (talk · contribs), JUDDHO (talk · contribs), Iam.20.O (talk · contribs), Iam.i.120 (talk · contribs), Iam.90.1 (talk · contribs) and ArmdShahAbdali (talk · contribs) are SPs. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for looking into this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Change of author's name under a picture

Greetings, Túrelio. I understand this must be very time-consuming for you so I will be short. This is a picture I uploaded on March 8, 2020, which is currently used by a number of pages in Wikipedia. If you look at the Metadata you will see my name, the date, and the equipment I used. Somebody, however, removed my name as an author and placed another one. Is it possible to reverse this? I am the author of the picture and not the person who possibly removed my name and not only placed his but also added his Flickr link. I thank you in advance. George. P.S. That is the name of the file: File:Portrait of King George I of Greece, National Historical Museum, 8 March 2020.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by George E. Koronaios (talk • contribs)

Hi George,

ok. It's a bit complicated. The original painting is in the public domain, so, you could legitimately make this photography. I have now added a template (Self-photographed), which fits for such cases, and added your name. What remains is the question under which license we should put your photography. The PD-Art, which was added by User:Levivich, is nonsense, as this is for cases without permission by the photographer. For now I have changed it to PD-old. But you could also take CC-Zero. --Túrelio (talk) 14:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Alejandro Hernández Jorrín

Hola, por favor necesito que no revierta la etiqueta de eliminación que puse a la imagen, esa fotografía es de un artista con el cual trabajo y el no está conforme con la fotografía, y me pidió retirarla de wikipedia. Saludos Alejandro Hernández Jorrín (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, are you talking about File:Autorretrato. 2020.jpg?

If yes, ok, but the proper way is to open a regular deletion-request, not a speedy. --Túrelio (talk) 07:06, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

How?

How a public domain image (1) is copyright infraction? Erick Soares3 (talk) 14:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Erick,

the notification on your talkpage could have advised you about the first problem with this image. It is a screenshot, that contains single images at least 12 TV channels (my assumption). Does the Flickr-account really hold the full copyright for all these images? The second problem is the "license" PD-Mark on Flickr, which is actually not a license. It's just a statement that the uploader thinks that it is free of copyright. Usually PD-Mark is used for works which are not the own work of the uploader. But in this case this is the minor problem. If you want to contact the Flickr-owner and ask him whether he really holds copyright over the depicted channel content, I can put the image into a regular (slow) deletion-discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 18:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

AIV

Hi Túrelio, Could you take a look at the history of Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism and block the Johnson editor please?, Myself and anotther editor went to 2 noticeboards but unfortunately no one's been on. (I looked through the deletion log and found you :) ) Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

My colleague AntiCompositeNumber blocked him already. --Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Indeed they have, I left soon after asking you. Thanks for revdelling the disgraceful material. Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 19:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

WHY DID YOU DELETE MY IMAGE?

I OWN RadhaStirling2.jpg; You deleted it. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CatJon1 (talk • contribs) 06:55, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, stop shouting.

1) as the image-tagger noted "image was previously on mynewsdesk". 2) While you claimed it to be from April 2021, the image was published elsewhere quite earlier: 2019, 2020, Twitter. All this makes your claim of "own work" quite unlikely. --Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

PD-Art for photographs of old paintings

Hi. Can you please explain to me why PD-Art was wrong here [16]? I added the template and I don't understand the reason why it isn't applicable. Thank you! Levivich (talk) 16:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, PD-Art is used when the final image (the reproduction of the original PD work) was not created by the uploader, but simply taken from the web. In the present case, the reproduction was produced by the uploader, who put it under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 17:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Thanks! Levivich (talk) 17:28, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Please cancel the deletion of Stdi.jpg

Please cancel the deletion of Stdi.jpg screenshot (you made yesterday), since it refers to a program distributed under a FREE LICENSE - this is indicated in the top line of the screenshot Stdi.jpg (in Russian). The same link to the free license is listed on the download site of this software http://statsoft.msu.ru/Podr2~1.htm (in Russian: "free version for self-study and work under a free license"). Therefore, I can freely use any screenshots of this software everywhere without any permission! AKU-47 (talk) 10:07, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi AKU-47,

I have put the image into a regular DR, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stdi.jpg, to allow you to defend the image. --Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Blooding.jpg

Hello, it appears that I incorrectly tagged this as a copyvio. It appears that it is just a duplicate of File:Bleeding wound on thumb.jpg. I guess you might want to adjust the deletion rationale. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok. But it's nevertheless a copyvio, as the uploader claimed it as own work, which it isn't. --Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Saskia Marka, 2019.jpg

Lieber Túrelio, du hast das folgendes Foto, welches ich gestern hochgeladen habe, aufgrund vermeinlicher Copyright-Verletzungen löschen lassen - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Saskia_Marka,_2019.jpg Das Foto von Saskia Marka, welches von der Art Of The Title - Website (Quelle: https://www.artofthetitle.com/assets/sm/upload/tu/5d/8b/l7/SM-660px.jpg?k=41d399d40f ) stammt, muss die verantwortliche Fotografin, welche mit der Verwendung des Bildes in der Wikimedia-Datenbank unter Verwendung der Creative-Commons-Lizenz "CC BY-SA 4.0 einverstanden ist, noch freigeben. Ich hatte ihr schon die Einverständniserklärung zukommen lassen und sie wird schnellstmöglich der Wikimedia-Bildredaktion eine Einverständniserklärung zusenden, damit das Bild freigegeben werden kann. Ich ginge davon aus, dass Fotos bei denen die Rechte nicht geklärt sind, mindestens 7 Tage online bleiben und erst dann gelöscht werden, wenn die Rechte nicht geklärt wurden. Denn ich bin beretis ein paar Male so vorgegangen bei Fotos, die ich hochgeladen habe. Vorher hatte ich die Rechte mündlich geklärt und nach dem Upload des Bildes von mir, hat der Rechteinhaber so schnell wie möglich eine Freigabe per Email an die Wikimedia-Bildredaktion gesendet. Kannst du daher bitte in dem Zusammenhang das Foto wiederherstellen, da die Einverständniserklärung der Fotografin der Wikimedia-Bildreaktion so schnell wie möglich vorliegen sollte? Oder wird das Bild unter dem Link "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Saskia_Marka,_2019.jpg" automatisch wiederhergestellt, wenn der Rechteinhaber/Fotograf seine Einverständiserklärung an die Bildredaktion gesendet hat. Ich würde mich über eine Antwort von dir freuen und wünsche dir noch einen schönen Sonntag, --FilmMusikUndAnderes (talk) 14:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Hallo FilmMusikUndAnderes,

auf der Bild-Seite gab es leider keinen Hinweis auf die Genehmigungseinholung. Im Prinzip ist es so, dass der OTRS-Mitarbeiter, der die eingereichte Genehmigung bestätigt, mich oder einen anderen Admin dann um Wiederherstellung bittet. Sobald du von der Fotografin hörst, dass sie die Bestätigung geschickt hat, kannst du mir auch eine Nachricht geben; dann stelle ich es vorab wieder her. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, herzlichen dank für deine hilfreichen Infos und pardon, dass ich den Hinweis nicht vermerkt habe. Aber klasse, so machen wir das. Ich gebe dir umgehend Bescheid, sobald ich weiß, dass die Fotografin die Freigabe an die Bildredaktion gesendet hat. Mit bestem Gruße,--FilmMusikUndAnderes (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Move request

Hi administrator, can you move these:

• File:Sitas Exile by Raja Ravi Varma (1848 - 1906).jpg to File:Shakuntala lost in Dushyanta's thoughts.jpg
• File:Raja Ravi Varma, Sita (1901).jpg to File:Raja_Ravi_Varma,_Shakuntala_lost_in_thoughts_(1901).jpg

Reason: Misidentification of the painting, for further details please check the description of the move requests on their page.

Since no one is responding and you are an admin I know, please help me. 245CMR (talk) 04:16, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done. However, as the files were on Commons since 5 / 10 years, I've left redirects in order not to break external (outside of Wikimedia) uses. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok, Thank you very much 245CMR (talk) 10:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Joseph Lubin (24961255915).jpg

File:Joseph Lubin (24961255915).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

These pictures should not have been marked for speedy deletion. It's very common for conferences to hire photographers who put their copyright tags in the EXIF. The conference buys the copyright and then gives them a CC-license on Flickr. This is a very common thing. Vera ^(talk) 09:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Image incorrectly deleted

Hi there, you deleted this [file](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jordan_Harrod_Headshot_2020.jpg) for a copyright violation -- this is incorrect, the image was uploaded by Jordan Harrod herself. Happy to provide an email screenshot from her confirming this, but please reinstate the photo file. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catyeo18 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Catyeo18,

that alone doesn't help. She wrote by herself, that the photographer was "Lensy Michelle", who is a professional photographer. In such cases we require a confirmation by the rightsholder. So, said Lensy Michelle should send a confirmation of the choosen free license (cc-by-sa-4.0) for this image to [email protected] . --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please cancel the deletion of File:ZdravkovaBG.jpg

This picture is my own. All instances of publication online are taken with or without permission from myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Euskate (talk • contribs) 14:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Hmm. How can an image, which you uploaded only today, be used already externally? Please take this to COM:UDR. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

TSK, instalaciones, CEO y Presidente

Hola¡ Gracias por la ayuda.Es mi primera vez y lamentablemente creo que no será mi último error. he enviado un email solicitando el permiso tal y como aparece en la ayuda. --Ischutze (talk) 10:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Revdel

Hey! You have been very helpful in cleaning up copyvio uploads by LsnIg334 and their alt, Lsn113. However, one deletion request has been pending since January. That is the second revision File:Microsoft at City Center East, Bellevue, with old logo.jpg, which would require a revdel. Aside from that, it is probably relevant to note that the actions from Lsn113 could be counted as block evasion, as they occurred after LsnIg334 was blocked (for the third time). Regards, IceWelder [✉] 12:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done, thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 12:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Help !

Hi Turelio. I need your help ! For days I have been putting in order all the categories of Popes, Papacy, Papal States, Holy See, Vatican City, etc. A big mess everywhere ... but slowly I'm succeeding. Now in Category:Pontificum Romanorum effigies there are all the portraits of popes but without giving the name of each pope. I'm adding them. Now I have come to all the popes named Ioannes. For the file of Pope Ioannes XX was given the file name Ioannes XXI. I thought it was a mistake and moved the file to the name given in the etching. But later I discovered that Pope Ioannes XX never existed. So the error is in the image not in the name given to the file. And indeed the pope's iconography is correct. The same happens in the two successive popes: Ioannes XXI is the image of Ioannes XXII. Ioannes XXII is the image of Ioannes XXIII. Now could you please rollback my file moved from Ioannes XXi to Ioannes XX? I would be very grateful to you. Thanks so much. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 22:18, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Wow, I didn't even know of this historical oddity. --Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much Turelio ! Yes, the history of popes and papacy in the middle Age is really incredible and crazy !! Cheers, DenghiùComm (talk) 07:45, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Steve Jobs (book) File:Steve jobs translte book.jpg

Hi Túrelio, I got a Persian version of Steve Jobs (book) with a mobile camera and a cam scanner app, but you deleted it without informing me, so I wanted to know why this was so bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krp sash (talk • contribs)

Hi Krp sash,

sorry that I didn't notice that you weren't notified by the user, who had tagged the image as copyvio-suspect.

I do not doubt that you created the image of the cover. However, bookcovers which contain more than the title and author's name, are usually copyrighted; see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Book_covers for more. So, when you reproduce them, you violate the copyright of the author or rightsholder of the cover. The portrait-shot of Steve Jobs is very likely still in copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 18:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Theresa May election infobox.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Can you please restore the original file? I tagged this by mistake. Thanks, ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Túrelio, can you also please restore Theresa May.png? ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 19:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, although could you just restore the first three versions? ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Commons talk:Deceased contributors

Hello . On Commons talk:Deceased contributors, you add User:SlimVirgin but suppress User:Moroboshi [17]. Are you sure ? Père Igor (talk) 16:16, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, not "suppress", but remove from the to-do list, as he is already in COM:RIP. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Sunil K. Deore

Hi. I have seen some images of Sunil K. Deore being speedily deleted for F10... Mr Sunil K. Deore seems to be well in scope of Commons. If the files were deleted for some other reason, that should be clarified, IMHO. --E4024 (talk) 16:20, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Found only one, File:Sunil deore 11.jpg, which has been restored. --Túrelio (talk) 20:27, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

My file

Why do I need to tell you the hell do those images I damn used? For this image, why do I need to tell the images I used? I DONT UNDERSTAND COMMONS. ALL I WANNA DO IS UPLOAD SKYLINE PICTURES WHILE I LIVE IN CHILE? --Mausebru (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Stop shouting! If you don't understand Commons, then you should stay away. --Túrelio (talk) 16:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for shouting, but why isnt the new version of File:SyrianCivilWarMap.png not appearing? Is it because I did it a few minutes ago? `Mausebru (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mausebru, should be visible now. Sometimes it helps to clear your browser's cache. For your other questions please see at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Political Crisis in Peru.png for answers. --Túrelio (talk) 18:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Dua Lipa for Warner Music.jpg

Hello there. Please restore the aforementioned file. I fixed up its licensing, but apparently another user (Jeff G.) readded an incorrect speedy deletion request. --Kuatrero (talk) 03:13, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Kuatrero, no, it was different. The uploader Alexismata7 himself requested deletion per G7, which I then performed. If you think the image is worth to stay, you should first contact the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Restore File:Farnborough Air Show 1 - Request Permission Rich Cooper Photography.jpg

Hi @Túrelio, can you help restore File:Farnborough Air Show 1 - Request Permission Rich Cooper Photography.jpg. We have received an OTRS email regarding the same. Satdeep Gill (talk) 08:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Help

You previously deleted that Hindu goddess image, which deleted because of Criteria G3, an image intended as an attack, treat or vandalism. It also serves no educational value. This was reuploaded by previous uploader alt account. Is there a way to stop this? This is creating religious hate, please stop this.🙏

Also, I have requested on Wikidata to protect Lakshmi entry from this vandalism. Sorry if I am panicking..245CMR.•^👥📜 10:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, image deleted; it's also a copyvio. Which accounts were used to insert this image into Wikipedia or Wikidata? The 2 uploading accounts obviously weren't used for that. --Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much, but is there a way to stop its recreation. Right now, I am saving Lakshmi Wikidata from being vandalised by that img .245CMR.•^👥📜 10:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Is there a way .. — if they use continuously different accounts, not so easy. Best would be for now to put the filename on your watchlist and the article that is vandalized. If it goes on, you might request full protection of the article that is vandalized. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I am telling... Wait a sec, i am checking .245CMR.•^👥📜 10:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

• User:Inter Services Intelligence PAK
• Burhan.ahmed.k
• Right now, he ia using this IP 46.134.20.146 and most probably threatening me. .245CMR.•^👥📜 10:41, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok, but that's on Wikidata. I am not an admin there. --Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok, Thanks for all of your help. I will remain grateful.245CMR.•^👥📜 10:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		You are a hero on commons. Thank you for your help and guidance..245CMR.•👥📜 10:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Question from POitor

Hello Túrelio, you have deleted File:Անմոռանալի օր ֆիլմ.png, please delete this file as it was accidentally uploaded.--POitor (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi POitor,

there is no file with such a filename. Did you mean File:Անմոռանալի օր(ֆիլմ).jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 08:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes it's that, Sorry I replied late, I just did not receive a notification that you replied. Thanks for deleting --POitor (talk) 18:23, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Norbert Feher map of crimes committed in Italy

the map is different, in the colors it is modified. the image is trimted and edited — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter39c (talk • contribs) 20:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Doesn't matter. Changing an existing work does not make it "your work".[18] --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ralf Roletschek

FYI, while closing this deletion request I noticed some of the files had already been speedydeleted by you so I restored them as part of this deletion request. Multichill (talk) 21:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Rob van Dorssen, Een huis vol vragen, Le Mans

Hello,

You deleted these images, but I own the rights. The sources you refer to use my image, not the other way around. Can I please reupload the images? Aededj (talk) 09:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

• File:Een huis vol vragen voorkant.jpg showed a bookcover with artwork likely above COM:TOO. Reproduction of such works violates the copyright of the the original artist/designer. So, you need to provide his/her permission.
• File:Voorkant le mans.jpg — same problem as above.
• File:Rob van Dorssen.png (not yet deleted) — you claimed this photo to be from 2021, when in fact it was published as early as 2019; also a license is missing.

--Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

I know the publicer and the person that made the artwork. I asked permission for the usage of the images and they agreed. What do you want me to do now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aededj (talk • contribs) 10:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Aededj (talk) 11:43, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

you need to prepare a permission draft using the boxed text in Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, add the filename (or URL on Commons) and the name of the choosen license and send it to the artist (or rightsholder), ask him/her to date it and to add his/her name and send it directly to [email protected] (OTRS). Our OTRS-volunteers will check the permission and either approve it or ask for more information. The email will not be published. If one artist has created 2 images (or what's reproduced in the images), you can put them together into 1 permission, so he/she doesn't need to send 2 permissions. --Túrelio (talk) 12:20, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you very much Túrelio for the speedy deleletion of my last upload. Sorry for my mistake. Even if the photo of the postcard was taken in 1914 or earlier, I had not realised the author just died in 1975 ! Regards Cquoi (talk) 09:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Bernhard Fragner DUK.jpg

Hi, cause you deleted the forementioned file, I just wanted to let you know that the same problem exists with the files File:Bernhard Fragner, 2020.jpg and File:GlobeAir DreamTeam.jpg. Bye --Frank Murmann (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Für das letzte Bild liegt aber eine Genehmigung bei OTRS vor. Hast du event. Kontakt mit dem Hochlader? --Túrelio (talk) 14:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Nein, ich habe keinen Kontakt zum Autor. Der Artikel, in dem die Bilder verwendet wurden, wurde mittlerweile auch wegen zweifelsfreier Irrelevanz schnellgelöscht. Gruß --Frank Murmann (talk) 04:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Landslide scene on Alishan Highway 01.jpg

Please tale a look at special:diff/418661541 and special:diff/419506745. The original file name should not be deleted in order to discuss the dispute in which he is engaged. Because I can't see where the photo originally discussed is. He didn't give reasons in the edit summary to explain his edits. When I asked: "How do you know that the photo shows Alishan Highway," he was angry and he attacked me.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

I can't read Chinese. I deleted only a redirect from File:Landslide scene on Alishan Highway 01.jpg to File:Chang Shih Bridge 2005.jpg, and that was a full year ago. The rationale by the tagger (Solomon203) was "wrong file name." --Túrelio (talk) 18:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Please tale a look at special:diff/412530858. Actually, I reminded him that you inputted the "incorrect" category on the file, and also reminded him why the photo looks like it is "Chang Shih Bridge" which located near Kuaigu. I don't know why he attacked me, but I feel that he has no intention of cooperating with me. For example, that when I tried to get us back on track in a discussion, he berated me based on what Reke said. Obviously, he wanted to “escalate” the dispute and show everyone I have XXX syndrome. So, I want to request deletion of the insulting comments made by User:Solomon203.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Cosplay of Alcina Dimitrescu (Resident Evil Village) • 2.jpg

Hey! You deleted this image under fake reason ("Video Game Screenshoot"). I'd like you to restore it.--Александр Мотин (talk) 18:23, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Reason might have been erroneous, but not fake. Restored and put into DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cosplay of Alcina Dimitrescu (Resident Evil Village) • 2.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

File oriental woman

Почему мои работы удаляются?! Вы удалили уже не первый мой файл на тему Восточных женщин, какие проблемы?! 😠 Я публикую файлы не для того чтобы их удаляли! Ana Avdeeva (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

did you ever look at your talkpage User talk:Ana Avdeeva?

• File:Muslim wedding dress and pelerine from fluff black swan ( photo 29 june 2016 year Arthur Milner and Yulia Roskoshnaya).jpeg — file had no license-template. In addition: "Author=Anna Avdeeva" and "Permission= Yulia Roskoshnaya" doesn't make sense.
• File:Yulia Roskoshnaya oriental woman ring white gold Swarovski.jpg — background-image found to be an undeclared stock-image[19]

--Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Rollback

Hey, just wondering if you would mind granting me rollback, so I could undo bad edits / block evasion faster. Per the rollback policy, asking an admin is preferred, and you've done me some favors before with deleting some files, so I hope you wouldn't mind. Thanks! Elli (talk) 01:26, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Important note

Hello Túrelio ... You have recommended an image that you uploaded for deletion! Under the pretext that the site https://paketaninternet.com/gallery/palestinian-israeli-update-5-12-2021-israel-palestine-war-intensifies.html... He uses the image, but please note that the site has taken the image from Wiki Commons and this appears when you click on the image inside the site. Therefore, the image you uploaded is free and exclusive. I hope you will undo the deletion. This means that the site is the one who took the picture from Commons! I hope to recover the image as soon as possible. Image : File:Israeli bombing of a civilian building 2021.jpg.

Osps7 (talk) 11:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Osps7, I've undeleted the image for now. However, why does the image no EXIF/metadata? --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Stegophiura nodosa.jpg

Hello. Could you please notify me first when you have a problem wih one of my picture rather than deleting my work without any discussion ?? This is extremely rude and non-collaborative, whether you are right or not. Now I can't even check if there was actually a mistake or not, so this is more trouble for everybody, and several pages are probably disfigured but impossible to know which ones. So now I need you to put it back so we can see the problem and fix it without harming the encyclopedia. Please remeber that contributors are not machines... Regards, FredD (talk) 05:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, you were notified about the problem: User_talk:FredD#File:Stegophiura_nodosa.jpg. The image[20] is under CC-NC, which is not compatible with COM:L, as you surely know. So, IMO there is no room for discussion; except, you want to askt the photographer for releasing the image under a compatible license. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Anti-Lithuanian activity on Commons

@Túrelio: Hello, thanks for deleting the falsely named category of "Lithuanian occupation of Vilnius". Could you please take a look at this dispute as well: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Files_named_with_meaningless/disruptive_names_(motivated_renaming_was_reverted_without_any_valid_reason) because it is a similar anti-Lithuanian story, which is full of disruptive naming and editing. The activity is performed by a Belarusian ultra nationalist who calls the Lithuanians as rubbish (1, 2, 3). -- Pofka (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Please delete

Please delete File:Thakurgaon Govt. Boys' High School Administrative building.png‎ and File:Logo - Thakurgaon Govt. Boys' High School.png‎. Uploader said to my talk page that they uploaded those photo from facebook. I advised them to request deletion and they did but later you declined the request. I think those photo should be deleted. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done already by a colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Possible copyvio's

Hi Túrelio, Thank you for earlier deleting a file I tagged copyvio File:Fateh rifle.jpg, but I fear this users uploads may all be copyvio for instance see File:Gaza (drone).jpg and Euronews Persian, the others I spot checked also show up on various arabic/persian language sites. I'm not sure how to go about such mass tagging (11 files left) on commons as I only came across them on en-wiki when draftifying problematic articles by a new user. Thank you and apologies for the intrusion. Joseywales1961 (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

I've checked all his uploads and tagged them for copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Joseywales1961 (talk) 14:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

why

why did you delete my photos Ronan letsholo (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Did you look at your talkpage User talk:Ronan letsholo? Both images were found to be prepublished on other sites, suggesting they are not your own work, contrary to your claim. --Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

On File:YCOD Primary Logo.png

While reviewing the page on en.wp which this file was used , the website at that time had no release of copyright information. Which then, I tagged the file and other files uploaded by Evanroden1 for copyright violation (and also for other issues on the page itself). Almost immediately after, the editor pinged me on my en Talk page asking for reversion of the images with this: They're all available under this link. At the top of the page, they're licensed under the creative commons 4.0 license (listed as a white bar at the top of the page). I checked the website again, and it is now with the CC banner. Do you think the file can be/should be restored based on that? Robertsky (talk) 10:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. I've restored the file File:YCOD Primary Logo.png. However, it needs still to be clarified who is the author or rightsholder. What is the role of the uploader? Even a freely licensed work cannot simply be claimed as own work by a non-author. --Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Eurovision logo

Hi Túrelio, Could you temporarily undelete File:Song Contest 2017.png please so that I can transfer it to EN?, Many thanks, Warm regards, –Davey2010^Talk 14:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

@Davey2010,  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, Many thanks, Unfortunately I didn't realise the logo is already at EN, Should've checked the article before asking you so apologies for that, Many thanks for temp undeleting tho I appreciate it, Take care and stay safe, thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 18:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello. Please can you delete this image: File:Quincyallen.jpg another copyright violation from the same user who uploaded the File:210519-quintin-jones-mb-1514.jpg which I see you removed. The mugshot is clearly not his own work and violates copyright. Thank you. Inexpiable (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Julian Walder Foto-Urheberrecht (File:Julian Walder - Wien 2020.jpg)

Hi Turelio! Sie haben heute mein hochgeladenes Foto von Julian Walder gelöscht, obwohl ich in die Bezeichnung geschrieben hatte, dass ich alle Rechte besitze für eine FREE LICENSE, dies aber noch belegen muss und so schnell wie möglich nachholen werde. Ich werde von Julian Walder eine schriftliche Einwilligung zur Verwendung des von Ihnen gelöschten Fotos heute nachreichen und die Einwilligung vom Fotografen, falls auch nötig, habe ich bereits per Messenger erhalten. Können Sie das Foto, dann wieder restaurieren und hochladen? --Celklavio (talk) 15:52, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Celklavio

Hi Turelio! Sie haben heute mein hochgeladenes Foto von Julian Walder gelöscht, obwohl ich in die Bezeichnung geschrieben hatte, dass ich alle Rechte besitze für eine FREE LICENSE, dies aber noch belegen muss und so schnell wie möglich nachholen werde. Ich werde von Julian Walder eine schriftliche Einwilligung zur Verwendung des von Ihnen gelöschten Fotos heute nachreichen und die Einwilligung vom Fotografen, falls auch nötig, habe ich bereits per Messenger erhalten. Können Sie das Foto, dann wieder restaurieren und hochladen? --Celklavio (talk) 15:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Celklavio

Hallo Celklavio, wenn Herr Walder die Genehmigung abgeschickt hat, kannst du mir kurz Bescheid geben, dann stelle ich das Foto wieder her. Du brauchst es nicht neu hochzuladen. Falls du das noch nie gemacht haben solltest, siehe Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber). Vor allem sollte Herr Walder die Genehmigung selbst an OTRS schicken, also nicht über dich. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, die Erklärung zur FREIEN LIZENZ des Fotos "File:Julian Walder - Wien 2020.jpg" wurde heute von mir als auch von Julian Walder selbst an '[email protected]' versendet! Vielen Dank für die Wiederherstellung! Liebe Grüße --Celklavio (talk) 19:55, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Celklavio

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear Túrelio!

You have blocked the picture of "Julian Walder - Wien 2020" [Ticket#2021051410010299] FREIE LIZENZ, but in the meantime I have all permissions (written and sent to '[email protected]'; 'Permissions - German Wikipedia' <[email protected]>! Tomorrow I additionaly get the signature of the photographer as well, the permissions of Julian Walder (owner) and Andrej Grilc (author, photographer) I had from the beginning on! Unfortunately nobody is answering (nearly two weeks now) and nobody is releasing this picture for Wikipedia! I was in contact with Mr. Neumann, but he is lost! What else do you need - I have all rights! Thanks in advance - yours --Celklavio (talk) 09:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Celklavio

Hmm, ich hatte File:Julian Walder - Wien 2020.jpg doch schon vor 10 Tagen (s.o.) wiederhergestellt. Auf die Bearbeitung der eingesandten Genehmigung usw. habe ich keinen Einfluss, da ich nicht zur OTRS-Gruppe gehöre. Das kann aber erfahrungsgemäß schon mal ein paar Wochen dauern. Ggf. kannst du hier Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard mal nachfragen. --Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

VIELEN DANK!!! für deine rasche Antwort! Ich bin etwas beim Verzweifeln, gelöscht wurde es schneller als ich reagieren konnte, aber das Wiederherstellen scheint dort niemanden zu interessieren.... ich bekomme einfach keine Reaktion, Formular auf der OTRS-Gruppe vom Inhaber ausfüllen und unterschreiben lassen, alles ordnungsgemäß ... ich werde morgen noch zusätzlich zur Erlaubnis die UNTERSCHRIFT des Fotografen einholen, mehr kann ich nicht tun. Das Foto ist wichtig!--Celklavio (talk) 11:29, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Celklalvio

Удаление файлов

По какой причине вы удаляете файлы, который я публикую?! Это уже не первый раз, и вам уже писала ранее, но ответа не получила! Объясните причины! Ana Avdeeva (talk) 17:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi, well, you are mistaken: my reply to your first post is here, since 4 days: User_talk:Túrelio#File_oriental_woman.

However, File:Yulia Roskoshnaya oriental woman ring white gold Swarovski.jpg might be the next candidate, as its source and author entries are invalid. --Túrelio (talk) 18:16, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Del vandal

Hi Túrelio, thanks for deleting File:Kingdom of USA.png and File:Canadian.png despite a vandal's attempt to prevent it. May I also ask you to temp block that vandal - 2001:12B4:2EA:8601:3DBE:3D33:2E39:E3DF who keeps vandalising other files here? That IP is an attempt of block evasion by User:Lass-Lass[21], whose other sock uploaded these files. Thanks. — kashmīrī 19:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Cheers. — kashmīrī 20:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

This sock too, please: User:Arthur_Reader. It might come alive anytime. Thx! — kashmīrī 20:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Brawl Stars

Hello, good morning Túrelio. I come to tell you that on the Brawl Stars page you have deleted some images for copyright reasons. I have come to tell you that what you have done is wrong, because it is a work done by a Wikipedian and you cannot delete works that are made by someone from Wikipedia. --Estuar2 (talk) 05:54, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Estuar2,

assuming that you are refering to File:Logotipo de Brawl Stars.png: it was deleted under the assumption that it is not really own work. While you uploaded this logo May 27th, it can be found all over the web, which suggests it is not your own work. But even if you really created by yourself a true copy of the original logo, this would be a derivative and likely violate the copyright of the original designer. In addition, it's a re-upload of an already deleted copyvio File:256-2568642 brawl-stars-logo-brawl-stars-logo-png-transparent.png, which is a blockable offense. --Túrelio (talk) 06:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Help

Hi

Can you help me by deleting Talk: Jeff G at one of my accounts please

🤗 Thank you

Have a good evening Naledi Mathatho (talk) 16:12, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

@Naledi Mathatho: Túrelio already deleted Talk: Jeff G. Where in the world are you that it is already evening?   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:25, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Which world are you? please answer that before I answer you 😃 by the way thank you Naledi Mathatho (talk) 16:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

@Naledi Mathatho: I live in New Jersey, USA, North America, on Earth, in Universe A1.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:53, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

What 😲 we live far away from each other I live in South Africa in Gauteng on Earth Naledi Mathatho (talk) 17:07, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so should we continue with our conversation or what ☺️ what are you doing 😍 I really enjoy talking with you Naledi Mathatho (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

@Naledi Mathatho: Continuing here would not be respectful to Túrelio.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 18:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry Naledi Mathatho (talk) 10:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of non-duplicates as duplicates

Why did you delete File:33643-Lisbon (36226898580).jpg, File:33641-Lisbon (35814350143).jpg, File:33651-Lisbon (36454542062).jpg, File:33661-Lisbon (35788490494).jpg, File:33639-Lisbon (35814346643).jpg and ‎File:33637-Lisbon (36623668035).jpg as duplicates when they were not duplicates by different versions of the same photo? Different versions of the same photo are allowed and are not duplicates. Please undelete them. Tm (talk) 08:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, to me they looked like duplicates. But let's see. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

For example: File:33643-Museu Nacional de Arqueologia (36226898580).jpg vs. File:33643-Lisbon (36226898580).jpg — IMO duplicates, minor differences in lighting. Should we really keep both? --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes. Different lighting, different white balance, exposure, clarity,etc. i.e. different versions, not duplicates. Tm (talk) 08:47, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your undeletions and sorry for the bother. Tm (talk) 08:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Newspaper screenshots

You have cancelled a screenshot of a newspaper cover page because you say was a copyright violation. I would like to understand this better because the screenshot contains the headings and cropped articles hardly readable and incomplete. It does not seem to me equivalent to copying a full article. Do you mind directing me to a justification of the copyrights for this use of newspapers, which BTW WP is full of. Thank you. Tytire (talk) 17:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Tytire,

I had copyvio-tagged this image per general copyvio-consideration, as the image contained the main portion of several articles and at least one photography with author-credit. With "general" I mean that in most countries of the world copyrighted works (text as well as images) are protected for 70 years after the death of the author. So, I did not take into account the theoretical possibility that Italy has different rules for copyright-protection for newspaper-content. In case such special rules exist, I can put the image into a regular deletion-request, which allows a discussion with input from other editors. --Túrelio (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback Túrelio. I am not competent in Italian copyright law, I just know those general terms you refer to. I think that in the particular case of reproducing the first pages of newspapers of historical significance, which is so common in WP, it would be very useful to see whether some experts of Italian law could help. I think this might be one of those cases where there is a risk of being more royalists than the king in WP, depriving maybe unnecessarily (may be) of the possibility of documenting history and collective memory for the legitimate non commerciale goals of WP. I would not be surprised even if newspaper editors would not only not oppose, but be pleased with snapshots of their archives being used for that purpose, which underlines the historical importance of their newspaper, without subtracting a dime from them. Laws are full of exceptions, an expert may advise about this case. Is such expertise available via Commons? --Tytire (talk) 20:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

and BTW for the little I know of Italian law, the presence of a photograph in a newspaper page does not change the rights, which belong entirely to the editor of the paper, being this a collective product, whatever the content.--Tytire (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Photo Francis nomination.jpg

Hi Túrelio,

Please put the photo back onto: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Drouin ...we are the owners of the copyright of that photo. This photo was taken by us.

-Andrew — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aphil2024 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi Andrew,

this image has been found prepublished nearly 2 years ago on Facebook by Francis Drouin. Please take this to Commons:Undeletion requests. --Túrelio (talk) 18:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Inaccurate deletion request

Greetings, Túrelio, and apologies for bothering you. Earlier today I uploaded this image "File:View of the National Garden of Athens and Zappeion Gardens from Mount Lycabettus on May 31, 2021.jpg" Sometime later the user Louis Carpon asked for my image to be deleted because as he wrote, "It is nonsense." My image is not nonsense. I am Greek and I am Athenian. I know my city. The title of the image is accurate and I tried to explain in the description what it is depicted in the image. After the request, I also added notes to make clear what I am talking about. Is it possible for the deletion request to be removed? It is a bit offensive, unfair, and totally inaccurate. Once again my apologies for bothering you and thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by George E. Koronaios (talk • contribs)

Hi George, I've contacted the nominator and asked him what he means. I understand that you are angry, but don't take this personally. Such things can always happen on collaborative projects as Wikipedia and Commons. One needs to get a bit of a thick skin. I would like to wait for an answer from the nominator, before closing the DR. And, by the way, don't forget to sign all your postings, using this code .--~~~~ Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Removal of my screenshot for File:Screenshot of the loading screen from Almighty- Kill Your Gods.png

Hi Turelio, why did you delete my photo of the games loading screen. I took that as I own the game and could not find a creative common photo to use. It was therefore from my gameplay and my fair use...there are other game covers and screenshots taken by other users which don't get removed so why was mine? --RailwayJG (talk) 21:36, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi RailwayJG,

most has already been explained by theinstantmatrix on your talkpage. Fair-use material is not allowed on Commons (per U.S. law). Even when you are the legal owner of a piece of art, as parts of a game are, by buying it you only acquired a license to use (play) it, but you did not obtain the copyright. So, you cannot make a reproduction (screenshot) and publish it or even release it under a free license. Not my choice, but copyright-laws. --Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Census 2021 India.png

The copyvio file you deleted File:Census 2021 India.png was recreated almost immediately. Note the user Neburner11 is also Neburner where they used File:Census India 2021 Logo.png, so this is the third time they create it. --Muhandes (talk) 11:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 12:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Pranay Dongre 27

Hi. All of the images this user uploaded are copyright violations. Would you look into it and delete them when you have time? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2603:301D:22B2:4000:95EB:5DB9:B94D:1C83 (talk) 14:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 11:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Çarşamba genel görünüm.jpg

Hi. I uploaded the photo by mistake. I was a beginner 4 years ago. It needs to be deleted urgently please İsmetby (talk) 10:09, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi İsmetby, but why? Is it a copyvio? During the >4 years of stay on Commons, many external users may use this image as it was offered to be under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 10:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Undelete request Category:GCR class 9K / LNER class C13 and Category:GCR class 9L / LNER class C14

Hi, can I get an undelete on these two please: Category:GCR class 9K / LNER class C13 and Category:GCR class 9L / LNER class C14 I don't know why one was deleted as "stupid", but they're both in use, linked from en:WP and were just emptied by a passing IP this morning. They shouldn't be Category:GCR Class 9K / LNER Class C13 because "Class" isn't a proper noun and so shouldn't be capitalised. Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 19:05, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done. But both were and are empty. The "stupid" came from the original tagger; I had replaced it by "empty" for the 2nd one. --Túrelio (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. That's why just being empty isn't a speedy deletion reason for categories, because so many are emptied by the nominator immediately beforehand. Edit-warring over the capitalisation is pointless (we are nowhere near consistent on this), but there were lots of existing links involved. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:38, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

ٖFilm Posters

Hi Túrelio, I asked the CEO of the film company Fuuse to upload poster of their two films "America's War on Abortion" and "Muslim In Trump’s America". These were meant to add to articles about these films.That was done by them, but deleted by you after few days. Do you think it is not allowed to add film posters anymore or there is some way that it can be done and not be deleted.--Jogibaba (talk) 14:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jogibaba,

could you post the filenames? (I have hundreths of deletions per day) Likely it wasn't clear from the descriptrion that they were authorized. Anyway, as we can never be sure about the identity of user-accounts, they will need to send a permission from their business. --Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio

these are the filenames. (1) File:America's War on Abortion - A two time BAFTA nominated film by Deeyah Khan.jpg. (2) File:Muslim in Trump's America - A film by Deeyah Khan.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jogibaba (talk • contribs) 17:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, ok. Both images were uploaded by Fuuse Films (talk · contribs). As sometimes users claim to represent a company or person, though not being associated with, in such cases, a formal permission needs to be sent. If you are in contact with Fuuse Films, you could prepare for them a permission-template by copying the text of the gray box on Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, pasting the filenames of the above mentioned images over the text-string "exact URL of the file uploaded on Wikimedia Commons", then mail them the resulting permission-text and ask them to complete the variable portions and, after dating and signing it, mail it from their official/business email address to [email protected] . --Túrelio (talk) 18:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Löschung von File:StadtbahnGleisplanAarhus2020.png

Hallo, vor Kurzem wurde mein o.g. Werk einer Schnellöschung durch Sie unterzogen. Da sich mir leider weder die Begründung noch der Vorgang insgesamt erschließt, muss ich auf eine Wiederherstellung bestehen. Zukünftig möchte ich darum bitten, solche Anträge mit der notwendigen Sorgfalt zu bearbeiten, und nicht "mal schnell" ohne genauere Prüfung durchzuwinken.--Stef.muc (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, da die Löschung bereits 1 ganze Woche her ist, kann ich mich nicht mehr an Details erinnern und was mich letztlich vom SLA überzeugt hat. Gemäß history war die Datei von User:Hjart G1-markiert worden, wenngleich in seiner edit-summary "broken" steht. Ich habe die Datei nun erst einmal wieder hergestellt. BTW: Bist du der Stefan Bauer, der im Bild als Urheberrechtsinhaber angegeben ist? --Túrelio (talk) 09:42, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Ja, der bin ich höchstselbst. Mag sein, dass der besagte Nutzer Probleme bei der Darstellung/Betrachtung der Datei hat. Das beschriebene Netz ist aufgrund seiner Genese (teilweise aus Regionalbahnstrecken hervorgegangen) größentechnisch nicht ganz unerheblich und ich bin nun mal ein Freund topographischer Darstellung…--Stef.muc (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Reqest to restore image Loremipsum.jpg

Hello Túrelio,

I ask you for restoration of this picture. It's me and I am a contributor and an employee of Wikimedia Czech Republic and I need the picture to be on my Meta page.

Thanks in advance, Natálie

--Natálie Schejbalová (WMCZ) (talk) 12:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Natálie,

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Another deletion request

Greetings, Túrelio. Yesterday I photographed the City Hall of Athens and published the photo in Commons (File:The City Hall of Athens on June 8, 2021.jpg). Almost instantly I got a deletion request for copyright violation in German. The City Hall of Athens dates to the 19th century and the third floor was added between 1935 and 1937. Another picture is used in the article of the Greek Wikipedia where you can find the necessary information about the date of the building (https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%94%CE%B7%CE%BC%CE%B1%CF%81%CF%87%CE%B5%CE%AF%CE%BF_%CE%91%CE%B8%CE%B7%CE%BD%CF%8E%CE%BD). Please, also, notice that there are no copyright claims on this image. If I am not mistaken, the Freedom of Panorama restrictions apply only to buildings constructed from 1990 onward. I hope I do not miss anything. Thank you once again for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by George E. Koronaios (talk • contribs)

Hi, I've commented in the DR. Please, always sign your postings! Otherwise, nobody knows the author. Also, on talkpages like this, you should add a new comment at the bottom, not at the top. --Túrelio (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

What is said on user page

Greetings: I think we need COM:OTRS regardless of what is on the user page of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Kaldym1952. This user has uploaded works by multiple people (sent to D and Speedy) and states on user page "my name is...", but I do not recall another single instance where we take FRzOO99 and decide that's "John Smith" based on self-statement without OTRS. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Ok. However, if he hadn't written this/his alleged realname into the description of these images, we wouldn't even take care of them, but take "own work" for granted. Also, the fact that he has uploads with his realname and others with different names (not labeled as "own work"), IMO is a signal the he did differentiate. That the latter files weren't detected since 2011, is our fault, not so much his. --Túrelio (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Please undelete File:Robot typing.gif

Hi, you have deleted File:Robot typing.gif refering to [22]. The website says "Credit: Rosa et al." I am Rosa. And I did mark the work as my own work. Rur (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Rur, I am sorry, but in such a scenario (upload of prepublished image), it is necessary that you send a confirmation from your official email address to [email protected] (OTRS) confirming that you are the original author/artist and the choosen license. The OTRS-volunteers will treat your email confidentially and will notify me when the image can be undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Can an author change the licence after publication ?

Hello,

I recently uploaded many useful pictures of rare species from iNaturalist, taken by Claude Nozères. However, he recently changed his settings on iNaturalist so all of his pictures which were previsously uploaded under a CC BY SA licence are now CC BY SA NC. This is why INaturalistReviewBot is tagging them for deletion, operated by you. But I thought that a CC licence was deemed "irrevocable" once published, isn't it ? This is hours of work vanishing for me, which is quite frustrating, all the more that all of these pictures were important on Wikipedias. Thanks and regards, FredD (talk) 07:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi FredD,

we have the same problem with Flickr. Though the community likes to repeat the mantra "CC irrevocable", that seems to be too simple. The author can decide to stop offering his work under a specific license at any time. However, that has no effect on previous publications of that work. It has also no effect on repositories, such as Commons, which have copied the work at a time when it was under a free license. The problem is the total intransparency of the change of license on Flickr. Therefore, we use a bot to check the license at the time of transfer, so there is no legal doubt about the license at that time. And we have {{Flickr-change-of-license}} to tag images for which the license was changed after upload to Commons. As the change-of-license problem with INaturalist has increased recently, we may need a similar process as with Flickr (bot-created record of license at source at time of upload and change-of-license-template). I would recommend you to address that problem by opening a thread on COM:VP or COM:AN.

For File:Psolus fabricii.jpg I have checked whether the original URL had been archived at archive.org or archive.is, regrettably not. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, it is now fixed for File:Uokeaster ahi.jpg, can you undelete it please ? Thanks. FredD (talk) 06:36, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

A question

Please see, this. Has it violated any copyright policy? —MdsShakil (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I don't think so. Image-metadata are in accordance with data on Flickr. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

I was a little unsure because there was a problem with some of the pictures I uploaded earlier. Should I continue uploading? —MdsShakil (talk) 19:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Sure. The problem with the 2 images mentioned at the bottom of your talkpage, was not your fault. Though they seemed to be under a free license, as declared by the license shown on the Flickr-page, their metadata (EXIF) stated that they were "All rights reserved" and the photographer-name was different than the Flickr-user name. That may have happened per ignorance or per bad intention by the Flickr-user. Some people abuse Flickr for license-laundering (aka Flickr-washing). You could not have known this. However, it would be wise not to upload any other images from this Flickr-account, as it is unreliable. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I haven't uploaded any more images of that user —MdsShakil (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Friedensstatue - foPgermany template

Du hast in eines meiner Bilder von der Friedensstatue das FoPgermany template eingefügt. Das ist natürlich richtig, aber ist es auch notwendig? Ich frage, weil ich ohnehin über alle meine Uploads gehen werde und dann bei etwa 15000 dieses Template einfügen könnte (auch bei Demo-bildern, wo ja im Hintergrund Häuser zu sehen sind) das ist nur ein geringer Extra-Aufwand. Ich habe die Notwendigkeit für dieses Template aber eigentlich nur bei ganz wenigen Einzel- oder Sonderfällten gesehen? --C.Suthorn (talk) 11:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Eigentlich gehört das auf alle Bilder, die nur aufgrund der Panoramafreiheit legal sind. Dass wir davon weit entfernt sind, ist mir durchaus klar. Praktisch kann dir das Vorhandensein des Bausteins im Laufe der Zeit zumindest den einen oder anderen LA von Leuten ersparen, die sich mit Panoramafreiheit nicht so auskennen. --Túrelio (talk) 12:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

A question

I wanna know how is File:Univision 41 2019.png a Copyright violation?ItsJustdancefan (talk) 20:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Well, you took it from a site that expressedly states "Copyright ©2021 Univision Communications Inc. All Rights Reserved". It's not a mere text logo. Whether it's above COM:TOO can be decided definitively only in court. However, in cases of doubt our policy COM:PRP demands deletion. If you want to use it on :en Wikipedia, you can upload it locally and try to claim fair-use. --Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Help in overriding file

Hello Túrelio. Would you be able to assist me in overriding a file at File:Flag of Singapore.svg with this? I have contacted two administrators on Commons, and a few on Discord, but none have had the time to reply or assist me so far. This would be greatly appreciated. The discussion has already been held at File_talk:Flag_of_Singapore.svg#Redrawn_based_on_official_construction_sheet., and my overwrite request has been pending for nearly three months. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 14:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Seloloving,

ok. Are you online now? --Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I am. Seloloving (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

So then, it's open for upload NOW. --Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! I very very much appreciate your assistance. You may lock the file again and delete this. Seloloving (talk) 15:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks.  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Move from Wikimedia Commons to Wikipedia

Hi, Could you please reupload the image at to Wikipedia? The original file should still be accessible to you, so I please ask for you to move it to the appropriate project as it is allowed on Wikipedia under Fair Use. It is a non-free logo with a rationale to be used on WP, as was the case with the old logo. Thanks in advance! - 62.24.138.24 19:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi 62.24.138.24,

it would be better if you did that by yourself. However, I can temporarily undelete the file for you, if needed. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Leo Regan Photo

Hello there,

I think you have mistakenly removed a photograph from Wikimedia Commons linked to a biography I have submitted, on the filmmaker Leo Regan.

Details: 10:09, 24 May 2021‎ CommonsDelinker talk contribs‎ 5,117 bytes −69‎ Removing Leo_Regan(1a).jpg; it has been deleted from Commons by Túrelio because: Copyright violation: Taken from Vimeo. [https://i.vimeocdn.com/portrait/504170 undo

The photograph was uploaded by the photographer who took it and not taken from any of Leo's videos. The link to the first video is Leo's own Vimeo page where he uses the image as his profile photograph, as he does on all of his other sites on the web. The second link above is to a woman neither I nor Leo know.

Can you reverse this edit from your end or do I just have to ask the photographer to upload again from hers? She went through all of the normal processes first time around to establish that the image was hers. Thank you. Captbalbo (talk) 13:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Captbalbo,

ok. As a first act, I've restored File:Leo Regan 2.jpg, as it is even a bit different than the external "hit" (which doesn't have the camera-label). However, as you seem to be in contact with Sarah Ainslie, could you ask her to send from her business/official email address an informal mail to [email protected], in which she just confirms to be the photographer of all her uploads concerning Leo Regan? That would avoid future problems like this one. --Túrelio (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Would you mind restoring Leo_Regan(1a)? Sarah removed the Sony logo on the original photo because we were worried that might be a copyright issue. I will get Sarah to write the email today so everything else from her is covered. Thank you 77.102.100.153 13:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

I had restored File:Leo Regan(1a).jpg already 3 days ago. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Sarah has emailed permissions as you suggested. All the best 77.102.100.153 10:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Circum Peak stone runs.jpg

Hallo Túrelio, über File:Weddell-stone-runs.jpg stieß ich heute zufällig auf die von Dir 2009 gelöschte Datei File:Circum Peak stone runs.jpg. Hier wurde das originale Bild fälschlicherweise als Duplikat gekennzeichnet, obwohl es das Original ist. Die überlebende Datei ist ein Ausschnitt des gelöschten Originals (es wurde oben und unten beschnitten). Ich würde Dir daher nahelegen, das Original wieder zu restaurieren. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 07:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! --AFBorchert (talk) 13:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Little help

I found this image on pt.WP uploaded under a fair use rationale. As the image was uploaded on Flickr under a 2.0 license, I decided to upload it here and nominate the Pt.WP image for deletion. However, when the image was already uploaded I find out that another identical, but with lower resolution, image was uploaded here sometime ago. What to do in this case? Regards.

Tulério, it seems that things are more serious than I thought. Could you please give it a look at this user uploads (see his Talk page). It seems that he's engaged in COM:LL. He uploaded several images from Flickr accounts that only uploaded images to be uploaded on Commons. I created a thread here, but things seems worse that I thought, and I would like someone experienced to look into beforehand. Thanks again for your time.--SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 02:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi SirEdimon,

the account in question seems to be a sort of complex case. While he has many uploads deleted as copyvios, the above mentioned image, the 2nd version (low res), got an OTRS-confirmed permission. As I am on holiday for some weeks, I cannot devote too much time currently to analyze his upload-pattern. We should simply be on watch and check all his uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Tulério. First, I'm sorry to bother your holidays, and thanks for answering my message. What should I do about the images? Can we merge both? Which of them should be deleted? What should I do? Regards.--SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 00:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Lag3

Zu der gerade von dir gelöschten Revision von File:Lag3.jpg noch ein Nachtrag: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arbeitsgericht und Landesarbeitsgericht München.jpg ist mittlerweile genau die selbe Situation. Und dann ist das erstere ein Duplikat des zweiten :-) Ich schreib dich nur an weil du dich schon reingedacht hattest. No pressure. Agathoclea (talk) 14:20, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden with Queen Elizabeth II.jpg

Hi Turelio, could you take a look at the deletion request above? You deleted File:President Joe Biden meets with His Majesty The King of Belgium and Prime Minister Alexander De Croo.jpg under similar circumstances, and I'm not sure why. Bait30 (talk) pls ping me when you reply 14:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bait30, wrt the later image: it seems I missed to realize the version-history. However, as both files were uploaded this month, it seems justifiable to retain the high-res image over the low-res image, though the latter was uploaded a bit earlier. --Túrelio (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Ok, but why not rv File:President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden with Queen Elizabeth II.jpg to the high res version, which I uploaded first, and then delete File:P20210613AS-1419 (51269148664).jpg as a duplicate instead? By doing this you can keep the version and page histories intact. Bait30 (talk) pls ping me when you reply 22:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Hallo

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DerHexer&diff=569004125&oldid=569002037

Bitte DAS versionslöschen.

--Fan636 (talk) 19:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done.--Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Danke. --Fan636 (talk) 20:10, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Redirects

Hi Túrelio, Hope all is well my friend, Just wanted to ask if you could undelete the redirect File:Cosplayer of Yoko Littner 20180520a.jpg please as the file has been here since 2018 and so could break any links that may exist on websites,, Thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 13:10, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Davey, undeleted and speedy reverted. --Túrelio (talk) 14:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Hey Túrelio, Brilliant thank you so much :), Take care my friend, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 16:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Requesting closure

Hello Túrelio, Thank you for responding to many of my speedy deletion requests. Could you perhaps close Commons:Deletion requests/File:TESTF76550W3E.png? You already deleted this file. Thank you for all of your help! Jerm (talk) 17:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Request for delete

Hello. please delete File:Order of Shafa Ribbon.png (you can also check this image) (Here I mean something else and I mispronounced it) --Matin.A «بحث» 12:46, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Flag of Dobruja tatars.png

FYI: The discussion at this Deviantart post might have some additional information: It does excist but perhaps only for the organization.. so it might be used as a flag for their union.. yeh. Apparently not a hoax flag, though I could not find out what organisation they were talking about. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Ok. I've undeleted it and put into Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Dobruja tatars.png to allow for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 19:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Photo you deleted on the basis of copyright violation

Hello - I see that you deleted the photo that I included of the subject (Marcia Cebulska)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Marcia_Cebulska --- inquired with and was given the photo by the subject – of which she owns the photo; I also provided the name of the photographer that took the photo, which is used by the subject for a variety of purposes, including on her publisher's website and other. Consequently, I'm confused on what I have done wrong / why the photo is not acceptable. Your time in response is appreciated. Limestone9 (talk) 14:35, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

@Limestone9: Marcia Cebulska obviously has the right to use the photo for some purposes. For the photo to be allowed on Commons the rights for all purposes are needed and a permission by the rights holder to commons has to be sent. You will find templates as com:OTRS. Once the rights holder has sent a permission release to OTRS by email, the photo will be undeleted. --C.Suthorn (talk) 15:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your response, insight and link. I will further review and try and remedy the photo issue. Limestone9 (talk) 18:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Limestone9, there is a similar problem with File:Patricia Traxler-Kansas poet.jpg. Did you reproduce this image from the mentioned book-backcover oder did you obtain it from the depicted person? --Túrelio (talk) 19:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello. Pretty sure this file: File:Gerald Bordelon.jpg is clearly not his own work. Can you delete/remove? Thank you. Inexpiable (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Official VM Council picture.jpg

Hi Túrelio. A while ago I tagged File:Official VM Council picture.jpg as a copyvio because of a copyright notice on the source's website, but I recently received this message on enwiki from the photographer. Looking more closely, it apears works on the City of San Diego's website are in the public domain if proper attribution is provided [23]. Could you take a quick look and restore if appropriate, or otherwise advise on how to proceed? Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. DanCherek (talk) 16:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:40, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Redirect Category:Duchesse brisée → Category:Broken duchesses (furniture)

Guten Abend Túrelio, Entschuldige, ich habe Dich gerade in der falschen Sprache gepingt. Ich glaubte, Du wärest auch in der französischen Sprache firm. Es geht um verschiedene französische Möbel des 18. Jh., die in englischen kunsthistorischen Publikationen ihre frz. Bezeichnung beibehalten, wie z. B. das Louis-Quinze Himmelbett lit à la polonaise, das in der engl. Wikipedia fälschlicherweise wörtlich übersetzt als en:Polish bed auftaucht. In diesem Zusammenhang entdecke ich diesen redirect von der früheren Category:Duchesse brisée zur Category:Broken duchesses (furniture). Auch das lässt sich nicht übersetzen und heisst richtig auch im englischen Duchesse brisée und wird unter dieser Bezeichnung in mehreren Wörterbüchern definiert , , , , . Wärest Du bitte so freundlich, die Weiterleitung rückgängig zu machen ? Vielen Dank im Voraus und frohes Schaffen, --Bohème21 (talk) 20:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

References

— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAafi (talk • contribs) 08:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Bohème21, ich habe Category:Duchesse brisée wieder hergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Ich danke Dir, Beste Grüße --Bohème21 (talk) 22:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Type 075.jpg

This is my original drawing and I have only uploaded this drawing to wikimedia. I am asking for an undo of the deletion.--星海军事 (talk) 10:11, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Broken duchesses

Hello, see here please. Cordially.Finoskov (talk) 19:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Finoskov. I am sorry, but at the moment I don't have a clue what you want to say me. Is a related to performed or rejected deletion? --Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Reshmi Rumal

Hi Túrelio I've uploaded the image File:Reshmi Rumaal Sharyantra.jpg locally on Urdu Wikipedia under the non-free rationale. Since this is a copyrighted image, it cannot stay on commons despite its usage over the months in few places. I had uploaded it when I was new to the project. I hope this makes sense. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 08:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Deleted now. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Deletion

Pretty sure this file File:Toncst.png and this file also File:215x90_toocast-1374090994374.jpg is not there own work, can you delete or remove it? ItsJustdancefan (talk) 00:53, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision deletion

Dear Túrelio,

Please check this user uploads. Some of the uploads need to be deleted, especially the unnecessary uploads like on these files:

• File:Wikipe tan by SigurdHosenfeld.png
• File:Klaudia Cieśla 5439.jpg
• File:Wain cats 6.jpg
• File:Miejski Ogrod Zoologiczny w Warszawie - Tygrys.JPG
• File:Kemonomimi tiger.png
• File:Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.png
• File:Olga sukhareva.jpg
• File:20110901 Zoo de Pont-Scorf (42).jpg
• File:Kiwix icon transparent.svg
• File:LG전자, 새로워진 ‘소녀시대 쿠키폰’ 출시-2.JPG
• File:05 Nathalia Department - Flickr - rgvzoomin.jpg
• File:A bikini girl posing near beach.jpg
• File:Beautiful Muslim Woman from Malaysia.jpg
• File:Model Desiree Ortiz.jpg
• File:Young Woman in Red Dress.jpg
• File:Jimbo.svg
• File:European Union politic personality icon.svg
• File:Cut Nyak Meutia.jpg
• File:Tabakspfeife.jpg

Yours sincerely,
Anonymous user — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 114.125.245.90 (talk) 09:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi 114.125.245.90,

I have checked all above listed files, but did not find any which I would consider definitively out of COM:SCOPE of Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections

Hi Túrelio! Maybe you can help me? [24]? --ManFromNord (talk) 14:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Transfer of the body of Jovenel Moïse.png - Wiederherstellen

Hallo Turelio, wärst du einverstanden, die Datei zu erst zu diskutieren bevor wir sie löschen? Denn evtl ist das ein Legitimer Uplaod, siehe Commons:Deletion requests/File:ANBILANS Fenk Vin Leve KÒ P JOVENEL MOISE, DCPJ Gen Kontwòl Zòn Nan (The Body of Moise is transverd away).webm zum Video welches der Datei zu grunde liegt.--Sanandros (talk) 20:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi Sanandros,  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Thx.--Sanandros (talk) 22:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Die ältesten Höhlenbilder der Welt

Hallo Turelio,

ich möchte Bilder zu den ältesten Höhlenbildern der Welt hochladen. Ich habe dafür die Erlaubnis durch den Forscher Maxime Aubert per email erhalten. Wie kann ich diese permission nun so angeben, daß die rechtliche Seite für WP geklärt ist? Mr. bobby (talk) 09:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Mr. bobby,

zunächst solltest du einmal schauen, ob in der Email eine konkrete Lizenz genannt wird oder nur eine Erlaubnis zur Nutzung in der Wikipedia erteilt wurde. Letzteres reicht leider nicht aus. Falls eine konkrete Commons-kompatible Lizenz (siehe COM:L) genannt wird, könntest du diese Mail an [email protected] weiterleiten. ABER: eigentlich wird die Weiterleitung von Genehmigungen vom Supportteam (früher OTRS, seit kurzem VRTS) nicht mehr akzeptiert. (ich weiß dass das lästig ist, habe die Regeln aber nicht gemacht und gehöre nicht einmal zum Supportteam.) Verlangt wird vielmehr, dass der Rechte-Inhaber bzw. -Geber die Genehmigung selbst direkt ans Supportteam sendet. Falls die vorliegende Genehmigung aber noch keine konkrete oder nur eine "für Wikipedia"-Genehmigung enthält, müsstest du den Rechte-Inhaber ohnehin kontaktieren und bitten, dass er/sie eine adäquate Genehmigung erteilt. Vorlagen dafür gibt es hier: Commons:Email templates (engl.), Commons:Messages_type#Envoyer_directement_par_email (franz.) und Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber) (deutsch).

Da du grundsätzlich bereits ein positives Signal vom Rechte-Inhaber erhalten hast, kannst du die Bilder bereits hochladen und fügst dann folgenden Baustein ein: {{OTRS pending}} . Das hat auch den Vorteil, dass du in der Genehmigungsvorlage, falls du dem Forscher eine neue schicken musst, gleich die exakten URLs der Fotos einfügen kannst. --Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

So lautet die email:

Dear xxxx,

No problem. The images are here: <censored>

Best wishes, Maxime

-- Prof. Maxime Aubert

Professor of Archaeological Science | ARC Future Fellow (2017-2021) Top-10 scientific breakthroughs of 2020

Top-20 scientific discoveries of the decade (2010-2019)

Top-10 scientific breakthroughs of 2014 Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural Research (GCSCR) and Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution (ARCHE) Griffith University | Gold Coast campus | QLD 4222 | G06 Room 2.19A T +61 7 5552 7843 | email [email protected] W https://experts.griffith.edu.au/18859-maxime-aubert/

Disclaimer: This email and any attachments or annexure hereto are confidential and no use may be made of them without the consent of, or pursuant to a written agreement with, the sender.

Mr. bobby (talk) 10:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Ich muß sagen: das Prozedere ist kompliziert. Und zeitaufwändig. Würde es genügen, einfach das wichtigste Bild hochzuladen und zu schauen, was passiert? Mr. bobby (talk) 10:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. Aber es ist halt ein Rechtsakt, ähnlich wie ein Vertrag. Ich denke, diese Fotos sollten den Aufwand doch wert sein. Aus der AW des Professors kann man leider nicht schließen, welcher Lizenz er zugestimmt hat. Falls du in deiner ursprünglichen Anfrage keine Lizenz erwähnt hattest, musst du spätestens jetzt eine auswählen, der der Prof. dann noch zustimmen muss. Ich würde dir die französisch portierte CC-BY-SA 3.0-FR [25], in der Annahme dass er eigentlich Franzose ist, oder halt die aktuelle internationale CC-BY-SA 4.0-Int [26] empfehlen.

Andererseits, soooo viel Aufwand ist es auch nicht. Du lädst zunächst die Bilder hoch. Dann kopierst du dir entweder in die französische oder in die englische Vorlage, fügst die Adressen der bereits hochgeladenen Bilder darin ein, mailst ihm das ganze mit der Erklärung, dass die Wikimedia-policy halt eine konkrete freie Lizenz verlangt (wichtig: lass nicht die o.g. Adresse zu der Lizenz weg, die du ihm vorschlägst), und der Bitte, es sich durchzulesen und mit Datum und seinem Namen unterzeichnet an [email protected] zu mailen. Wenn er das dann tut, ist schon alles fertig. --Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Habe jetzt drei Bilder hochgeladen. Ich maile mit Aubert auf Englisch. Den Rest muß ich morgen mal angehen. Mr. bobby (talk) 11:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi, is it possible to remove the initial upload File:SIAN-markering i Oslo 31 juli 2021-04.png and just to keep the edited, later one? (I originally uploaded a version with unblurred faces by mistake). If that isn't technically feasible, plese just speedy delete the whole entry, and I'll re-upolad the correct version instead. Thanks in advance! Asav | Talk 13:43, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Danke schön! Asav | Talk 17:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Andrey Aksenov

Good afternoon. You have deleted the photo, stated the reason for the copyright infringement. This photo was thrown to me personally by this politician, the site that you indicated is not the owner of this photo. 02.08.2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustang397 (talk • contribs) 07:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mustang397,

as I didn't delete any image uploaded by you so far, you are likely refering to File:Андрей Аксёнов.jpg, which had been uploaded by User:Anatolii192. So, I wonder: are you using both user-accounts?

Now, for your own upload File:Andrey Aksenov.jpg, which was also found prepublished 2 months ago here. Was this also given to you by the depicted politician? If yes, then you cannot claim to be the author. Also, in such cases our policy requires that the photographer or the rights-holder sends a permission to [email protected] (VRT). The permission should have the content as the template shown in Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file and needs to be send directly from the photographer or the rightsholder to VRT. (Regrettably we seem to have no Ukrainian version, also Russian an Bielorussian.) --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Machine-gun tactics (IA machineguntactic00appl).pdf

In the deletion comment, you appear to have given the work a 90 year copyright term. Why? --Fæ (talk) 14:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fæ, that was the comment by the original nominator[27], which has automatically been copied by the template-script into the edit-commentary. Correctly, the term would last until 2027. The file had anyway been saved to Wikisource. --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of category SVG logos of companies associated with telecommunications

I do not understand how this category was Empty and nonsensical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheEarth1974 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi TheEarth1974,

you can be quite sure that I do not delete categories that are not empty. However, as you didn't specify the exact category-name, I could not find and check it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Finally, I was able to dig it up: Category:SVG logos of companies associated with telecommunications was deleted already in May 2021. It had been tagged by User:Adamant1 and is still empty. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

speedydelete

Hallo Turelio! Wo hast du die Sichtbarkeit von file: Furth 1 Emmering 1 jpg. geändert? Es ist immer noch die alte Version, wo man diese Chiara und das Nummernschild ihres Autos noch sieht. Ich habe doch ganz deutlich geschrieben, daß das Bild bis zum 10.8. gelöscht sein Muß!!!!!!!!!!, sonst geht die zum Rechtsanwalt. Also SPEED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 07:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

@Edelmauswaldgeist, das liegt an deinem Browser-Cache. Starte den Browser neu, dann wirst du sehen, dass links im Foto der Bereich mit dem Auto weggeschnitten ist. Da du diese schreiende Chiara ja irgendwie zu kennen scheinst, kannst du ihre Behauptungen bestätigen, dass 1) sie irgendeinen Bezug zu dem Haus hat bzw. in dem Foto auftaucht (ich sehe da niemanden) und dass 2) das "Denkmalgeschützte Haus" tatsächlich nicht abgebildet ist? Und, gemach, heute ist der 5.8. --Túrelio (talk) 11:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio!Vielen Dank, das Auto ist tatsächlich weg, nachdem ich den Laptop neu gestartet hatte. Diese "schreiende Chiara" ist damals mit ihrem Auto aufgetaucht, als ich das Haus fotografieren wollte. Sie scheint dort zu wohnen. Wenn man das Bild stark vergrößert, sieht man sie tatsächlich ganz schwach an der Hausecke stehen. Der rechte Hausteil ist laut bayrischem Denkmalsamt denkmalsgeschützt. Da habe ich halt das ganze Haus fotografiert, was diese Dame scheinbar gestört hat. Du hast schon recht, irgendwie habe ich jetzt Panik bekommen. Vielleicht könnte man ja vorsichtshalber die schreiende Dame auch noch rausschneiden, dann kann die sich nicht mehr beschweren.Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 13:58, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

So, war einige Friemelei. Aber nun ist auch das "Geisterbild" weg. Schau mal ob das für dich so ok ist. --Túrelio (talk) 16:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request.

Hello. Pretty sure this file: File:Larry Gene Bell.jpg is clearly not their own work. A duplicate here as well: [28] Can you delete/remove both? Thank you. Inexpiable (talk) 16:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I've tagged the file on Commons. However, I am not an admin on :en-Wikipedia and, due to geo-blocking, I have no access to the claimed source[29]. So, I cannot verify if it's really a mugshot and if from a state where such images are in the PD. --Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi there. I was able to track this photo to a series of mugshots from the Lexington County Sheriff's Department [30], so it is not a federal US work and non-free. I deleted the file at Commons and added a fair use rationale at the English Wikipedia. And here's a tip for Túrelio: You can often circumvent geoblocking by searching the original URL at the Wayback Machine of archive.org. I did this for the NY Daily News Article and there was no credit for the photo, so I used an inverse image search with TinEye. De728631 (talk) 21:18, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Image exports

Hello. Do you think these images of Pauls Kalniņš and Frīdrihs Vesmanis are able to be exported to Commons? They are probably taken around the same time as Janis Cakste.jpg and Zemgals.jpg, which both use Anonymous-EU. Thanks. --Reppop (talk) 02:51, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Reppop,

not so easy. In both cases the source-link is not working, i.e. it does not show the image. (For the second one, I was able to correct the link now) So, there is currently no information about the true source and the date of photo (original). Thorough research would be required to show that the photo was in fact never attributed to an author. If you are willing to do this, go on.

Generally: When moving such images from a local project to Commons, there is always a risk that here it will be judged more strictly, which may result in deletion and then it may even be lost for the local project. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Alright. Thank you. --Reppop (talk) 23:28, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

User:MOHA2000MOHA

HI WHY YOU DELETED MY JPG AT MARYAM SHEIKHALIZADEH IAM OWNER OF PICTURE AND MRS SHEIKHALIZADEH ADMIN RESPECT TO MY WORK — Preceding unsigned comment added by MOHA2000MOHA (talk • contribs) 15:04, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi MOHA2000MOHA, the answer is on your talkpage User talk:MOHA2000MOHA. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Jane Fraser, President of Citigroup at Singapore FinTech Festival.jpg

Moin Túrelio,

Du hast die Datei am 29. Juli gelöscht. Wir haben eine Freigabe per Ticket:2020121910000289. Hatte ich vergessen, das einzutragen, oder stimmte sonst etwas nicht mit der Datei? Der Einsender hat sich nochmals gemeldet und fragt, warum die Datei jetzt weg ist.

Gruß und schönes Wochenende, --Mussklprozz (talk) 05:43, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Mussklprozz,

oops. Ich hatte nicht gemerkt, dass die Permission von einer IP entfernt worden war. Jetzt wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Danke für die rasche Hilfe! Kannst Du bitte auch überprüfen, ob das bei File:Bill Gates at Singapore FinTech Festival 2020.jpg ebenfalls so ist? Der wurde von @Wdwd: gelöscht, der auf meine Anfrage auf seiner Diskussionsseite noch nicht geantwortet hat. Schönen Sonntagnachmittag noch! --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:32, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Löschantrag

Hallo Turelio! Danke erstmal für deinen Einsatz. Wenn man das Bild normal anschaut, ist das Auto und Chiara weg. Aber bei der Vergrößerung ist alles wieder da. Hoffen wir mal, daß sie das berüchtigte Foto nicht vergrößert, sonst geht es mir doch noch an den Kragen. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 08:59, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, du hast offenbar schon wieder ein Browsercache-Problem. Wenn ich auf das Bild klicke und es vergrößere, sind Auto und Geisterfrau weg. --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Mein Computer ist schon ziemlich alt. Nochmal vielen Dank für deinen Einsatz. Ich hoffe, diese Frau gibt jetzt endlich Ruhe, nachdem ihr Achim so deutlich geschrieben hat. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 11:52, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of Patera Building image

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Uploading_images#:~:text=If%20the%20image%20you%20wish,with%20a%20fair%20use%20rationale. "If the image you wish to upload is not under a free license, but meets all of Wikipedia's fair use criteria, then you are permitted to upload it directly into the English Wikipedia with a fair use rationale." I have worked this image through [Ticket#2021080610006134] and e-mails with Alfred Neumann found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content, and I can see nothing that would support your action.Nigel PG Dale (talk) 22:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

See Commons:Fair use. Fair-use material cannot be uploaded to Commons, but needs to be uploaded locally, i.e. on :en. --Túrelio (talk) 22:38, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi, can you remove the files shown here. Thanks! Ltn12345 (talk) 23:27, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion

I accidentally uploaded a file that I thought was ok to add but I have realized I was mistaken. Can you delete it please: File:John Thanos.jpg. Thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:25, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Another issue. This user is back at again uploading content that is not his. Can you ban him? Image in question is here once again: File:Gerald Bordelon.png and you deleted the file once already. Perm ban him? Thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 19:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for notifying. Image deleted. Well, we don't ban people for uploading 2 copyvios. Now he got his first general copyvio-warning. If he continues, he will get a temporary block. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Please undelete

• Category:Unidentified advertisements on Lisbon trams -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you! But now we uncovered its parent Category:Unidentified advertisements, still red. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Barracks

Regarding, "Túrelio (A) deleted page Category:Military barracks ‎((incorrectly named) duplicate, content moved to Category:Barracks)." Please be informed that this particular word has two meanings: (a) "a building or group of buildings used to house soldiers," and (b) "a building or group of buildings used to house a specific group of people, such as laborers or prisoners, in austere conditions." Hope this helps, --Taterian (talk) 02:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

@Taterian. Thanks for the language-lesson :-) . However, if you view the edit-history[31] of the now restored cat, you will see that the above cited edit-summary wasn't mine and that a discussion with User:Minderbinder might be required. --Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Delete

Hello. Can you please look at my request (it was archived with no response) and uploads by this user? NMW03 (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 18:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Question

You asked why I wanted them deleted. I don't think I have copyright on them. Do I? King Pius (talk) 13:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Then tag them accordingly as copyvio or no permission. --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Claas Relotius Reporter.jpg

Hallo Túrelio. Danke für die Umwandlung ist einen normalen Löschantrag. Falls der Uploader der Fotograf/Rechteinhaber ist, was müsste er konkret tun, damit die Bilder bleiben können auf Commons? Ich kenne mich nicht gut auf Commons aus. Danke und Gruss --KurtR (talk) 18:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Hallo KurtR,

ich habe den aus der externen Quelle identifizierten Fotografen direkt angeschrieben und um Klärung, d.h. entweder Bestätigung oder Ablehnung/Löschaufforderung, gebeten. Habe bislang keine Reaktion erhalten; aber falls er ans Supportteam bestätigt, muss ich das auch nicht, da dort kein Mitglied.

Zu deiner Frage: wenn der Uploader der Fotograf J.H. ist, müsste er das gegenüber dem Supportteam ([email protected]) glaubhaft darlegen (z.B. durch Senden seiner Antwort von bekannter H.-Emailadresse). Außerdem müsste er bestätigen, dass die 4 hochgeladenen Bilddateien sein Werk sind und er sie tatsächlich unter der gewählten Lizenz freigeben möchte. Das kann informell erfolgen oder mit dieser Vorlage Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber).

Wenn der Uploader nicht der Fotograf ist, muss er den Fotografen bitten, das oben beschriebene zu tun. Das Supportteam akzeptiert keine von Dritten weitergeleiteten Genehmigungen. --Túrelio (talk) 18:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Besten Dank für deine Erklärung und dass Du den Fotografen angeschrieben hast, ist eine sehr gute Idee! Ich muss mich mal mehr in Commons einlesen, damit ich das besser verstehe. Auch die E-Mail-Vorlagen sind gut, die kann man sicher gebrauchen. Viele Grüsse KurtR (talk) 21:14, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Kristin_Sutton_in_the_recording_booth,_2021.jpg

Hello. You deleted File:Kristin_Sutton_in_the_recording_booth,_2021.jpg on the basis that it was allegedly sourced from her Twitter page. Kristin Sutton is my sister-in-law and we own that image. What I uploaded is the original. Please undelete? Thanks in advance. CaptainChaosDunDunDun (talk) 19:27, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi CaptainChaosDunDunDun,

nevertheless, for prepublished material a permission to VTRS (formerly OTRS) is required. So, if Mrs. Sutton is the rightsholder of this image, she needs to send from her business/official email addresse an email to [email protected] in which she should state that she is the rightsholder (if she is) and eventually who is the photographer and confirm the release of this image under the choosen free license. To make this easier, you can copy the boxed template in Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion help

Hello. Could you help me out here and if possible on the other uploads below it? I have been contributing for a while but haven't run into something like this before. --2405:201:4013:80F1:14F7:A9E9:251D:9B28 20:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Uploads by Gandhian Activities (talk · contribs) too need to be looked at. They are the same people — Gandhian Activities is blocked on enwiki for inadvertent sockpuppetry. 2405:201:4013:80F1:14F7:A9E9:251D:9B28 20:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you :) 2405:201:4013:80F1:14F7:A9E9:251D:9B28 21:40, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

bizarre situation

Hello.

I noticed now an email in which you mentioned the removal of images from the page https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Jorge. I've been on vacation and I haven't been to email. I just saw it a few minutes ago. I couldn't participate in the discussion and now I can't.

I also don't understand why the debate begins written in German, as it would be equally strange if it were in Portuguese. Logically the English language should have been used, because it is global. How can I explain or defend a position in German?

I don't understand the reason for removing the images. The images are from paintings by Manuel Jorge, who was my father and one portrait by his friend Daciano Costa. I inherited all the paintings. The paintings are from my private collection and some I have given to museums, which are referenced in the text. I was the one who photographed the paintings. I do not realize. Thank you for an explanation.

Kind regards, João Barbosa — Preceding unsigned comment added by João Pacheco Barbosa (talk • contribs) 22:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I did send you an email? At least, I am not aware of. May be you got a notification-email from Wikimedia. And what debate are you talking of? Do you mean the deletion-discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bairro típico de Lisboa.jpg? It's in English, not in German. In addition, even if a discussion would have been started in one language, anybody who is not versed in that language, can use another common language.

Now to copyright: 1) How should anybody recognize that João Pacheco Barbosa is the son of Manuel Jorge? On-wiki we have no means to verify identities. 2) As Manuel Jorge died in 2015, his works are copyrighted til end of 2085, per current copyright-laws. So, provided you are the only legal heir of Manuel Jorge and that he did not transfer his copyright to any other institution, you need to send an email from your official (real-life) email address to [email protected] explaining that you are the only copyrighted holder for the original works of art (paintings) and that you want to release the uploaded reproductions of these paintings (each image/file needs to be mentioned) under the choosen free license. You should also mention who created the reproduction, i.e. who made the photography of the painting. You might also use the PT-queue at [email protected], but it has a huge backlog.

For the mentioned painting by Daciano Costa it's different: his works are copyrighted til end of 2075. The fact that you own or are in possession of a painting, has no meaning for copyright. If there has been no contractual transfer of copyright to you or any institution, the copyright will likely remain with his heir(s), i.e. spouse or children. They need to send a permission to [email protected]. You may prepare a permission-form for them using this template Commons:Modelo_de_mensagem#Português_Europeu. --Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

I made a mistake

May you delete this upload of mine, please? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bob_Ross_plushie_in_2021.jpg

Thanks in advance. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) - The file is currently at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bob Ross plushie in 2021.jpg where it looks like it's going to be deleted anyway and there's no great urgency for it to be deleted IMHO. –Davey2010^Talk 18:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Belle dephine no makeup.png

Deleting admin User:Túrelio, the image is still accessible at the source given with correct CC license, all as described on the file page. Why was it deleted?--BevinKacon (talk) 21:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, CC license is correct. However, even after viewing the WHOLE video, I couln't find the still/screenshot. Could it be from another video of her? --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi, can you remove this category. Ltn12345 (talk) 09:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Sobre Patria Roja

Hola, la imagen proviene del Facebook donde yo tenía guardado ese link para luego dar derechos del autor, lo que pasa es que la imagen se había eliminado del perfil y yo tenía esa imagen guardada en mi escritorio pero estoy dando todos los derechos al autor verdadero. La imagen no está para nada editada y espero que no la borren. Saludos--Junior2912 (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Junior2912

Hola Junior2912, you are talking about File:Patria Roja.png, right? 1) I have corrected the link to source to [32], as you linked only to the logo without the 2 captions. 2) You claimed this image to be under a free license (CC-BY 2.5). However, images on Facebook are not automatically under a free license. Also, the Facebook-site of PCP does not mention that its material is under a free license. So, there is no evidence for your claim of a free license for this image/logo. Of course, you may contact PCP and ask them to release the log/image under a free license. They may do this by sending a permission to [email protected] or by placing the license besides the image on Facebook. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi, I wonder whether you could delete this file? I made this map a few months ago, and at that time, I just do it for fun and I don't devote much research effort, so I think this map might not be 100% correct and contain many errors. And I think no one apart from me and maybe a couple of editors has seen this map anyway, according to this Ltn12345 (talk) 14:19, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request for File:Sajan Prakash (swimmer).jpg

Hello, Thanks for starting this delete discussion. As I had mentioned in the speedy request it is quite obvious by comparing the original uncropped image and the wikipedia image of Cherantha de Silva that this image has been wrongly labeled. Also google search for the two swimmers, Sajan Prakash and Cherantha de Silva can confirm the mistake. I was wondering if any more information is needed to confirm the deletion. Shantham11 (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

You are invited to comment!

You commented in the original Heather Moreton-Aboudaner RfD. Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Continental European breed files from Heather Moreton-Abounader Flickr stream is now open, your comments would be appreciated. --Pitke (talk) 20:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion confirmation for Copyrighted Screenshot images

this image was confirmed and nominated to delete long time ago, please delete this Copyrighted Screenshot images as soon as possible.--61.5.67.125 17:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

• Metadata shown it's edited screenshoot image, It wasn't a free common image, the uploader stealing image by capturing Débora Hallal's Instagram Live Streaming Session [1]
  Metadata shown it's edited screenshoot image, It wasn't a free common image, the uploader stealing image by capturing Débora Hallal's Instagram Live Streaming Session [1]

Deletion Request for Copyrighted Screenshot images

• there is NO Metadata shown that it's Camera image, It wasn't a free common image, the uploader stealing image by Screenshoting Miss Supranational 2021 finale, which aired Live on Television/Streaming media Watch Final video and check on 2:26:49-the end (same angle, same clothes, hairstyle, flower bucket, background and make up)
  there is NO Metadata shown that it's Camera image, It wasn't a free common image, the uploader stealing image by Screenshoting Miss Supranational 2021 finale, which aired Live on Television/Streaming media Watch Final video and check on 2:26:49-the end (same angle, same clothes, hairstyle, flower bucket, background and make up)
• 
  Metadata shown it's edited screenshoot image, It wasn't a free common image, the uploader stealing image by Screenshoting Miss Supranational Instagram Live Streaming Session at DECEMBER 14, 2018 check this post, same clothes, hairstyle and make up, while the uploader mentioned that this image captured on 18 August 2021, which totally fake.

This images is Obviously copyright violation, Metadata shown it's edited screenshoot image, Please delete this images as soon as possible.--61.5.67.125 17:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion confirmation for Copyrighted Screenshot images

this image was confirmed and nominated to delete long time ago, please delete this Copyrighted Screenshot images as soon as possible.--61.5.67.125 17:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

• Metadata shown it's edited screenshoot image, It wasn't a free common image, the uploader stealing image by capturing Débora Hallal's Instagram Live Streaming Session [2]
  Metadata shown it's edited screenshoot image, It wasn't a free common image, the uploader stealing image by capturing Débora Hallal's Instagram Live Streaming Session [2]

Delete Request for instagram image uploaded on commons

• the uploader stealing [zoyaafroz instagram image] then upload it here, the real image was posted at instagram on APRIL 12, 2021 vs. commons file uploaded on 4 July 2021.
  the uploader stealing [zoyaafroz instagram image] then upload it here, the real image was posted at instagram on APRIL 12, 2021 vs. commons file uploaded on 4 July 2021.

It's obvious Copyright violation, this images was not a free commons images at all!! It was uploaded so many months before he uploaded on commons.wikimedia.org. please delete!--61.5.67.125 19:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Please, god be careful

Please, see User talk:CoccinoR., and @King of Hearts: : there are a series of images that you have proposed as copyright infringement that if you had had the time and desire to check and simply by clicking on the site put as source you would have noticed that the whole site has a cc-by-sa license. I know the situation well because I am the external tutor of a collaboration between Wikimedia Italia and a museum association to which the images you have suggested refer to are violations. I'm sorry experienced administrators like you make such tacky mistakes, I hope it's just for the huge amount of work you have, but if this is so high that you have the possibility of an error, blowing up not only a handful of images but also the trust that I have had to build over time with entities that have recently decided to collaborate on the project, you should have the humility to reflect on your work. My greetings.--Threecharlie (talk) 18:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi @threecharlie,

I don't know what additional information I should get from User talk:CoccinoR. Let's take for example File:Maschere femminili.jpg. When I click on the alleged source-site https://www.museialtovicentino.it/ the image is not shown. Where is it? Where could I check the claimed free license? When I look for copyright-information at https://www.museialtovicentino.it/credits/, I am told that some images on that site are under CC-BY-SA, but others are All rights reserved. (I did check all that before tagging the images) So, with the data provided by the uploader, it is not possible to evaluate the copyright-status. --Túrelio (talk) 18:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I'm User talk:CoccinoR., the uploader of the photo. At the moment I'm cooperating as volunteer with the office that manages the entire museum's web of Altovicentino here in Veneto. During this period, under the supervision of Threecharlie, that helps us to understand and work correctly on Wikicommons, I'm uploading on wikicommons photos that you can find on our website https://www.museialtovicentino.it and some more that every museum of our web sent me in private, that are enclosured with a signed deliberation that allows me to publish and share them. If you need to verify this fact, I can send You via e-mail the signed deliberations. Hoping on your undestanding I'm at your disposal.--CoccinoR. (talk) 06:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi @CoccinoR.,

ok. As you are in contact with or being "mentored" by Threecharlie, I trust and expect that he is helping you to develop a permission that is valid and will be accepted by our Commons:Volunteer Response Team. Just a few basics: images must be released under a free license, not only "for use in Wikipedia". A photo of a 3-dimensional original work of art, which itself is still in copyright (artist/author not dead since >70 years), requires two permissions, 1) by the original artist and 2) by the photographer. A true reproduction of a 2-dimensional original work of art strictly requires only permission only by the original artist. Museums per se don't have the copyright for the original works of art they show, except they got transferred by the artist(s).

With regard to what I wrote above: for all the images I checked, your source-entry did not lead to the image. That needs to be changed at least for all images which were taken from their website. --Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Afbeelding geblokkeerd

Beste,

U heeft de afbeelding File:Anja Van Engeland.jpg geblokkeerd. Ik ben zelf nog nieuw in wikipedia maar wel de webmaster van de website van deze. Kan u mij vertellen wat ik fout doe en hoe ik dit kan corrigeren? Fonnysmets (talk) 20:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fonnysmets,

you wrote in the image-description that you are the photographer. Is that true? A license for a copyrighted photography can only be given by the photographer or the rightsholder, provided he/she obtained the full rights from the photographer. So, if Mrs. Van Engeland has obtained the full rights from the photographer, she (or her legal representative) needs to send an email to [email protected] (OTRS) confirming that she is the rightsholder and that she wants to release this image under the choosen free license. Forwarded emails will not be accepted by OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio,

Anja Van Engeland has send now an email to [email protected] with the release under CC license. Do I need to re-upload the image again Fonnysmets (talk) 10:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

no. As soon as OTRS-volunteers have accepted the permission, they will either undelete the image or notify me to undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 15:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Univision TDN 2019 logo

Hi, yesterday I uploaded an SVG of the Univision TDN 2019 logo, please don't erase it because we need an SVG version of the logo. Thank you --Oscar (talk) 15:27, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, seems you didn't understand what I did. It was like this: Somebody else requested the SVG version of the logo for speedy-deletion, as being a duplicate of the PNG-version. I converted the speedy-request to a regular deletion-discussion, as always required for for such type of duplicate-deletion requests. It's unlikely that it will be deleted. However, you should comment here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Univision TDN 2019.svg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:06, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Löschung von File:Haplochromis aeneocolor female.jpeg

Warum wird ein eigens von mir aufgenommenes und hochgeladenes Bild gelöscht, aufgrund von abgelaufener Lizenz? YFRag (talk) 23:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Moin YFRag,

"abgelaufener Lizenz"? Du hattest es ohne Lizenz(baustein) hochgeladen und warst darüber am 17.8. informiert worden. Da du nicht reagiert hast, ist es 11 Tage später gelöscht worden. Wenn du nun bereit bist, den Lizenzbaustein zu ergänzen, kann ich es entlöschen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Wo wurde ich informiert? Ich habe keine Benachrichtigung erhalten? Dann lass es halt gelöscht gibts halt kein Foto YFRag (talk) 18:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Auf deiner Diskussionsseite: User talk:YFRag. --Túrelio (talk) 19:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

WVIT logo

Hi Túrelio, can you please reconsider your deletion of File:WVIT Logo 2017.svg? That logo seems to be below the U.S. TOO in my opinion. The "flower" (it's not even a flower, but the feathers of a peacock) is not complex enough to be copyrightable, otherwise we would have deleted the NBC logo a long time ago. Even if you think it should be deleted, I don't think it qualifies for speedy deletion, and should've been DR'd instead. Thanks, pandakekok9 04:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi pandakekok9, there you are Commons:Deletion requests/File:WVIT Logo 2017.svg. --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

False Claim of Copyright violation.

You have made a false unsubstantiated claim involving my solely own picture of my 1954 Studebaker Conestoga. Yes the picture was originally uploaded by me to Station Wagon Forums. The picture has been shared on numerous sites. I however have never given up the rights to that picture. I did use a screen capture of the picture from my computer because i could not get my file picture to successfully upload. As a new user i would have hoped you would have reached out to me with your concerns instead of making a false claim of Copyright violation. NickWilson1964 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickWilson1964 (talk • contribs) 05:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

You falsely claimed that a picture of my own 1990 Corvette taken by me is in violation of copyright. The picture in question is my own picture. Yes it was uploaded to facebook if you would have taken time to look you would have seen it was uploaded by me to my personal facebook page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NickWilson1964 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

@NickWilson1964: Please see my post on your talk page. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi NickWilson1964,

sorry that I didn't notice you are a newby on Commons. However, you were notified on your talkpage about the perceived problems. On Commons, if there is any indication of a possible copyright infringement, we act rather fast per our policy COM:PCP to avoid legal risks for the uploader as well as for re-users, who may face litigation by copyright-holder. Also, a file can easily be undeleted, wheras a legal process usually cannot. As the files have been undeleted by my colleague and a regular deletion-discussion Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:NickWilson1964 has been opened, I can save myself going into the details of the individual pictures.--Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Non-identical files

File:Last American Soldier leaves Afghanistan.jpg and File:Final American soldier leaving Afghanistan, 2021-08-30.jpg clearly have differences in their file size and the coloring of the night vision. I don't know which one is original or best but they are not identical. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

I don't recognize any visual difference between the two. Pixel numbers are also identical. The different file-size is likely resulting from different JPEG compression-rate. --Túrelio (talk) 15:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Delecte picture

Hi Túrelio

You deleted this picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bateau_WIMBI_EXCLUSIVE%C2%A9.jpg

I'm the photographer and owner of this picture and I agree to give to wikimedia

So what is your advice ? Request to delete on the website ttp://boats.wimbi.com.au/company/ this pictire ? Add a special copityght ?

Or aonther advice

Thanks for your assistance

Jeni

--Jennifer55 (talk) 08:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Jeni,

but it wasn't even your upload, but that of User:Travelworld1606. Is this also your account? (It's not forbidden to have 2 accounts, though it's recommended to disclose it)

WRT your question: No, that is neither necessary nor would it help. When an upload to Commons, claimed as own work, is found prepublished elsewhere[33], this is a suggestion of copyright-violation, i.e. that the uploader might not bei the photographer.

Now, in such cases it is required that the photographer or the rightsholder sends from his/her official/business email address a statement to [email protected] clarifying the copyright-holdership and the intent to release this image under the choosen free license (Be aware that a release "only for Wikipedia-use" is not possible. The accepted free licenses allow everybody to use such images, even commercially!). You may use the highlighted permission-text from Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file as a template. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Re:File:Antonio Quarracino (recepción) 1.jpg

Hello Turelio, Already verified. I got the wrong URL and I have already corrected it. Thank you very much and regards, Macucal (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

File:TW 0068 Purim.jpg

The Dek-D page is dated to October 2020 the earliest, and clearly copied the image from Commons. The image is also clearly a crop of File:Purim AngKaew.png, which doesn't seem to appear elsewhere on the web. I don't see any evidence of copyvio. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Cc: User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh, who tagged the image --Paul_012 (talk) 22:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

@Paul 012: Hmm... Seems that I made a mistake. Sorry. Unnamed User^{Name me} 22:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

You are right. Image undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Help

Hello Túrelio. I'd like to report to you about a spelling error and a user who's continuing misspelling it. The error is the name "Ciriè", an Italian town that should be written "Cirié". All the articles of Wikipedia in any language spell it correctly "Cirié", as it's spelled in the official site of the town ([34]). A few months ago an IP changed the accent of all the categories in Commons on his own and requested to delete the previous category names too, you deleted them believing that renaming them to "Ciriè" was correct, but as you've seen now it isn't, it was correct before. This IP did the same in Wikidata, where all the Wikipedian articles listed are spelled "Cirié" while all the labels are spelled "Ciriè". Quite ridiculous... Well, today the errors were corrected, but a registered user, Arbalete, almost immediately started restoring the wrong spelling. I suspect that Arbalete and the IP are the same person, but apart from this consideration the point is that in Commons and Wikidata the town name is misspelled. I've told you because you're the one who deleted those categories months ago, I've preferred to tell you about this error and explain the situation than start an edit war with Arbalete. So, please, could you restore the correct categories and descriptions? You're an administrator, so I believe that I did the right by calling on you to fix this issue. If, instead, you thought that I should ask someone else, I'd write to another user. Please let me know, thank you. Otaperab (talk) 21:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

I've asked User:Arbalete for an explaination, User_talk:Arbalete#Cirié. --Túrelio (talk) 09:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I'd like to ask you what's your opinion, as an administrator, about this issue. Do you think that my request was right? Or that Arbalete's reverts were correct? Should we leave the things as they are to avoid possible edit wars? To me it isn't so important that his mass edits are reverted, but I think that I've shown quite clearly why they were actually inappropriate. Anything you say would be ok for me! Otaperab (talk) 21:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Otaperab,

as an administrator on Commons I don't have specific competence or authority for such questions. We usually prefer such questions first to be answered/decided on the Wikipedia concerned, which would be :it in this case. However, I acknowledge that this didn't seem to work in this specific case. I'll try to put the question up for discussion on the COM:VP over the weekend. Let's see if that works, which is not guaranteed. --Túrelio (talk) 21:50, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Túrelio. In the concerned Wikipedia there was a discussion indeed, linked by Arbalete, where it was proposed to change the name to Ciriè but the proposal was rejected precisely because Cirié is the name used in the website and in the Stature of the municipality, linked by me, and nowhere else it was proposed such a move as far as I can see. Anyway, putting the discussion where you said is a good idea. May I ask you to wait doing it because in the next days I'll have very short time to follow a possible discussion, please? I could do it when I'm back online. In my humble opinion, I really hope that dictionary won't be considered a more authoritative source than an official Statute, not so much for this specific town name but because there's the risk that many more pages of Italian towns will be renamed to an unofficial name, such as "Jesolo" to "Iesolo" in my example... Otaperab (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Ciriè

Hallo, it.wiki is not a good source. The question is disputed there, anywhere I used the ortography of the official dictionary of writing and pronounce of the Italian language.--Arbalete (talk) 10:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Here. The official site of the town is not a good source (unfortunately Italians use often to mistake é with è or also with e', and on this site you can find Cirié, Ciriè and Cirie'.--Arbalete (talk) 10:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

And also the Italian national enciclopedy, the Italian Touring Club and the Italian statistical institute write Ciriè.--Arbalete (talk) 11:00, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Has there been anywhere an on-wiki discussion about this issue, which reached a consensus? --Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

There is a discussion on the page Cirié of it.wiki. As it often happens, nothing was decided.--Arbalete (talk) 12:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

The official site of the municipality spells the name "Cirié", also in its statute ([35]). There's no doubt that the correct name of the town is that (I've also checked my paper geographic encyclopedia and it spells it "Cirié" too). Do you think that the "official site of the town is not a good source", Túrelio? It happens sometimes that the official name of an Italian municipality, when ending in -é or -è, is spelled differently somewhere else, such as in some dictionaries like the one linked above. Well, in Wikipedia as far as I can see it's always been preferred the "official" version, contained in the institutional website or in the statute, over any different version contained in dictionaries. The official spelling always prevails. An example: that dictionary also spells "Roé", but in the institutional website of the town it's spelled "Roè" and this has always been the spelling of this Lombard town in any page of Wikipedia. The decision is between a correct name, officially spelled "Cirié", and a wrong name that somebody writes "Ciriè". Luckily, in Wikipedia it's always been spelled correctly everywhere, even if here in Commons and in Wikidata there's a user who for some reasons is now disagreeing with the rest of the Project. Not too bad actually, there're just categories and file names here, rather than start edit wars we might leave things as they're now. Otaperab (talk) 12:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

The communal statute is not a good source about ortography. Anyway the same statute also uses somewhere Ciriè, so it's clear that it was written without care, as unfortunately often happens in Italy. The other sources I mentioned are much more precise.--Arbalete (talk) 12:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

You, Arbalete, are saying that. Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, and an ordinary dictionary can't prevail over an official statute. According to the dictionary you linked, the town of "Jesolo" should be spelled "Iesolo", and the same goes for other towns starting with J-. What should we do now, rename all Italians town like Jesolo, Jesi and similar to their dictionary versions starting with I-? Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, an institutional website fulfils this requirement, if other less reliable sources disagree we can't prefer them to an official source. I don't see any reason in your massive renaming of your own accord and against a stable situation since the beginnings of Wikipedia... But let's stop using Túrelio's talk page for our own conversation (I apologize!), if you want we can continue in yours or mine, and in case he has anything to ask us we'll come back to reply. Otaperab (talk) 13:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Image deletion help

Hi Túrelio, I hope you are well. I was wondering if you could please help me delete two images. A few years ago I uploaded two images and I no longer want them to be on Wikipedia but I am having trouble deleting them. I was wondering if you could please help me with deleting them for me? Thanks so much.

Hallo Turelio, ich hoffe es geht dir gut. Ich habe mich gefragt, ob Sie mir bitte helfen könnten, zwei Bilder zu löschen. Vor ein paar Jahren habe ich zwei Bilder hochgeladen und möchte sie nicht mehr auf Wikipedia haben, aber ich habe Probleme sie zu löschen. Ich habe mich gefragt, ob Sie mir bitte helfen könnten, sie für mich zu löschen? Vielen Dank Fabi121302 (talk) 06:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Fabi121302,

I did find only 1 image: File:Giovanni Niubo Freak Night 2015.jpg. However, as the first DR (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giovanni Niubo Freak Night 2015.jpg) has been keep-closed, you need a new rationale (and a bit of luck) to "win" a second DR. If you are still active in public life, you might consider releasing a newer, more suitable image, which could then replace the older one. In case of non-success you might also request that your username is removed from the author-entry of the image, if that is a problem. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Grafika na Commons

Czemu wy zgłaszacie grafiki do usunięcia i nie informujecie autora o powodach? Explain me your actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Campió99 (talk • contribs) 09:07, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Did you ever read your own talkpage User talk:Campió99? There you find the rationale in each of the problem-notices. For File:Grafika FCB.jpg there is also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos and symbols of FC Barcelona. Your uploads are not your own work, violate the copyright of its creators and expose re-users to litigation for copyright-infringement. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

So why this image wasn't deleted yet? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FC_Bayern_München_logo_(2017).svg Campió99 (talk)

That's not the same logo. Different logos and legislation may have different copyright-rules. Also see File talk:FC Bayern München logo (2017).svg. --Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

and those File:FC_Barcelona,_Camp_Nou(Ank_Kumar_)_02.jpg, File:FC_Barcelona,_Camp_Nou(Ank_Kumar_)_01.jpg, File:FC_Barcelona,_Camp_Nou(Ank_Kumar)_08.jpg, File:FC_Barcelona.jpg, File:Camió_FC_Barcelona_-_Campions_Lliga_2012-13.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Campió99 (talk • contribs) 23:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

First, sign your posts. Second, link images properly (wiki-syntax) please. I will look into these. --Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Creation blocks

Hi there. You've deleted a few files I've tagged as speedy G4. I've had to retag some, as they've been uploaded yet again. Could you put a creation block on them? These are the ones I've found so far:

• File:Sharon @ Nellie's (2589701696).jpg
• File:Sharon @ Tubby Dog (2588858369).jpg
• File:Sharon @ JAROblue (2589684412).jpg
• File:Mack with Edmontosaurus (3361068469).jpg
• File:Mack & Sharon (3361052493).jpg
• File:Brittney & Sharon (3466988509).jpg
• File:Mack @ The Cactus Club (3467808698).jpg
• File:Sharon @ Dairy Lane Cafe (3361239395).jpg
• File:Calgary Zoo (3361899874).jpg
• File:Calgary Zoo (3361078845).jpg
• File:Mack & Sharon (3361883002).jpg
• File:Sharon on the bridge (3361858578).jpg
• File:Twittering (2589703280).jpg

Could we also do something about this user, who continues to upload previously-deleted files even after numerous requests to stop. The user has promised to stop, but also states that he is "trying to finish that photographer". (See, for example, User talk:Orizan/Archive 3#Please quit re-uploading files). Mindmatrix 00:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

He just uploaded two more for the third time:

File:CHG Top Chef Finale (5790209107).jpg

File:CHG Top Chef Finale (5790208201).jpg

This needs to stop. Mindmatrix 00:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I've deleted all files, except one which could eventually remain in the cropped version, which I've created. I've instructed Orizan to adjust his upload-process to avoid such a mess. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Portret van Gerardus Johannes Petrus Josephus Bolland, hoogleraar Wijsbegeerte te Leiden Icones 313.tiff

Hi Túrelio, thanks for deleting this file yesterday, I guess, with the argument: (The author Georg Rueter died in 1966; the source says emphatically "This resource is protected by copyright"). That sources indeed now states the work is copyright, because it was altered three days ago after I had contacted them four days ago. Now I was still in the process of discussing this matter and wanted to check one more thing. Could you tell how you came to delete the image right now? Was it tagged as copyvio and if so by who? -- Mdd (talk) 13:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, I think I found the answer myself:

1. First I added the NoUploads template two days ago to the Category:Georg Rueter, see here, which might have triggered Gouwenaar
2. Second the next evening instead of tagging the file as copyvio (which I would have contested), @Gouwenaar: filed a speedy delete request, and notified the original uploader Mr.Nostalgic, see here
3. Third you deleted the file about five minuted later on.

Personally I would appreciate if I would be given a chance to contest the speedy delete request based on the local copyright policy here, and the precedent of a previous case. -- Mdd (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mdd,

at least I put the file into Category:Undelete in 2037. Now, if there is a serious possibility that the image will not infringe the painter's copyright, I can undelete and put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, but I pass. I found another way, see here to check the one thing, and might start a discussion at the appropriate place. -- Mdd (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Mohammad Hassan Akhund (cropped).jpg

Hi Túrelio, I am unable to see File:Taliban Leader-Mohammad Hassan Akhund.jpg, but File:Mohammad Hassan Akhund (cropped).jpg has been uploaded as a derivative of that claiming the deletion reason does not apply. This seems dubious, but bringing it to your attention in case there is something an admin could see behind that deletion. Thanks, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 14:43, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Afghanistan new emblem

You shouldn't have deleted the new emblem of afghanistan. You clearly did'nt read the refernces. It is comfirmed to be the official. Next time don't delete a file without knowing — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.38.159.39 (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

As you didn't specify the files you are talking about, I cannot comment. On Commons we usually do not delete for "not being correct", but for missing permission. --Túrelio (talk) 17:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Possible copyvio

Hello, you deleted File:UCP.png on copyvio grounds. The same user has also uploaded File:Umesh CP.png -- another photo of the same guy. I haven't been able to find a copy on the web, but I find it highly unlikely for the user to be a photographer. FYI, the same user has also attempted to create an article on en.wp, only for it to be declined. 2405:201:4013:802D:B92A:3B90:3279:A294 21:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

They have also uploaded File:Umesh Padala with Sonu Sood.jpg, File:Umesh Padala Image.jpg which are from the Padala's Facebook page (as per Google), File:Umesh Padala .jpg, possible copyvio from 1/2/3. Overall, seems like a paid editing scenario though. 2405:201:4013:802D:B92A:3B90:3279:A294 21:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

About File:DEM logotipo(2007).png and File:Datena (cortado).jpg

Hello @Túrelio: how are you doing? Both of these images shouldn't be deleted. The fist File:DEM logotipo(2007).png is a former political party symbol. Party logos are not copyright free but they have what is called fair use by wikipedia, which allows the redistribution of the photo. The licensing should have this information:

This is a logo of an organization, item, or event, and is protected by copyright. The use of low-resolution images on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use under the Copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. Certain commercial use of this image may also be trademark infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Logos. Use of the logo here does not imply endorsement of the organization by Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation, nor vice versa.

Plus, the very same image is already on Wikimedia Commons but without the png format: File:DEM2.jpg

About the second photo, it was already on wikipedia, and I uploaded cropped version of it. File: O Governador do Estado de São Paulo, João Doria, participa ao vivo do Programa Brasil Urgente do Datena. Local São Paulo-SP. Data 23 07 2019 Foto Governo do Estado de São Paulo (48359534426) (cropped).jpg

Thank you, Przelijpdahl (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Przelijpdahl,

wrt to your fair-use rationale: you need to know that on Commons we are not allowed to host fair-use material. Such material can only be uploaded locally, i.e. to :en, if you want to use it on :en.

The 2nd image, File:Datena (cortado).jpg, had already been deleted by a colleague. But that is a bit your own fault: you claimed it to be own work, which it is not, and you did not mention the source-file from which it had been cropped. Cropping an image does not give you any own copyright. I've restored it now with a corrected description. --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Hello, then I don't understand how virtually every political party has its logos on Wikipedia and this one can't. I searched for the wikimedia commons guidelines on this subject (political party logos), but all I could find was this page in which they say that party logos are fair use but we can upload them into wikimedia commons anyway. I am currently working on these articles (I'm expanding everyone of these election articles from 1945 to 2022) and I need the former symbols of the parties. Even though a few parties only recently changed their logos, someone not concerned with information and archive deleted them from wikimedia commons! Hence why I'm reuploading them, but as I told you, I didn't find the proper guidelines as how political party logos operate on Wikipedia. Do you mind sending me a page with this information if there is one? Oh and thank-you for the help with the second photo. Przelijpdahl (talk) 19:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

First of all, you have to make a strict distinction between Wikipedia and Commons. Our policies are not identical. As I had explained (and linked) already above, fair-use material is not allowed (per US law) on Commons. :en Wikipedia has an exemption policy. It requires local upload (on :en) and presenting a fair-use rationale for each such image/use; see en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. I don't know whether other Wikipedias also have such exemption-policies. You need to ask that locally. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Closed to prevent comments now that the discussion has moved to the proper venue, COM:UNDEL, at section § File:111122-M-MM918-006 (6425584105).jpg and File:091205-N-4021H-004_(4161307030).jpg. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 16:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

File:111122-M-MM918-006 (6425584105).jpg and File:091205-N-4021H-004_(4161307030).jpg

Can these files possibly be undeleted? I completely understand the user's concerns, but IMHO, it is not the job of admins to respond to threats of harm, rather the job of WMF office staff; there is the [email protected] email list if an image poses a threat to those depicted off-wiki, and WMFOffice may decide to delete files if they believe that it is in the interest of the public. I do see there is a line in the deletion policy that images that are used in a way that violate their personality rights (like by doxxing them) can be deleted by admins, but I do not know otherwise. If needed, the deletion discussions can be reopened so Commons users can address those concerns. Aasim 05:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not simply going to restore these images in this case. I see my approach justified by my responsibility as an admin to avert potentially threatening damage if I come across it. See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#how_to_deal_with_DRs_of_identifiable_Afghans_feeling_threatened_by_Taliban?. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

 Support. Let's not erase Afghans from the Commons please. Ongoing discussion at COM:AN. The sky is not falling, even in Afghanistan. Awesome Aasim has the right idea. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 15:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

what is ur problem

what is ur problem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pehlivanmeydani (talk • contribs) 09:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

See User talk:Pehlivanmeydani. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dalida image on commons

Hi, thank you very much for your quick intervention on File:Dalida Ciao ciao bambina EP.jpg. I haven't used wiki uploader for a while so I accidentally uploaded the image to commons rather than usual wiki. I went nuts cause I was scared of some admin report... I wanted to request speedy deletion immediately, but you were quicker! Thank you very much! Cordially.~~~~ Dalida Editor _{please ping or message me} 10:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Help me please

I need upload the profile picture of the professional soccer player Luis Carlos Sánchez, if you can do it for me I will appreciate it. Thank you so much. Bipro23 (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bipro23,

I am sorry, but I don't have time for that. You might search on Flickr for a image of him, which is under a Commons-compliant free license (CC-BY, CC-Zero, CC-BY-SA; but not CC-NC or CC-ND). Or you may try to find a Wikipedian in es:Vitória (Brasil), who might go to a game an take a shot of him. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Redirect still here

You may also want to delete this redirect File:Irish stamp. Roger Halpen, 2003.jpg of a file you recently deleted. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 10:24, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:54, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ger%C3%A7ekler#:~:text=File%20tagging-,File%3ANazis-%20Nzhdeh%20propaganda%20brochure-.jpg,-%5Bedit%5D

This is a Nazi Propaganda brochure that was made in 1942 you can find it everywhere in internet. There is no copyright owner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerçekler (talk • contribs) 10:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

"There is no copyright owner." Well, then how can you release them under a CC license, which can be done only by the copyright-owner? The images/photographies on these 2 pages/leaflets may still be under copyright. Usual copyright lasts for 70 years after death of the author, not 70 years after publication. Even if you want to claim unknown-author ({{PD-anon-70-EU}}), you need to do research and try to identify the original source/author. --Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Category:Lingua_Libre_misleading_items_by_WikiLucas00_12.19

Hello, and thank you for deleting some of the files of this category. May I ask why you proceed 20 by 20? Is it possible to massdelete them, so the task is solved earlier? See my talk page if you need the rationale of this deletion request.

All the best — WikiLucas (🖋️) 13:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

I am not aware of a possibility for mass-deletion; Nuke works account-related, not cat-related. So, I have to delete them one by one, which means at least 3 mouse-clicks per file. --Túrelio (talk) 15:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Eric Brown.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you take a look at File:Eric Brown.jpg? You deleted it a file of the same name on December 9, 2020 for not having proper permission. That file was attributed to someone's Facebook page who doesn't seem to be the uploader. A few weeks later the same uploader uploaded another photo with the same name, but this time claimed it as their own work. I can't see the first file that was deleted, but you can. Perhaps this is just file is just a misunderstanding of what "own work" means or maybe it just needs to be VRT verified, but I wanted to check with someone before tagging it again with {{Npd}} since this might be a case of a previously published image needing further verification. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

It's the same image, as the previous one. Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of the image "File:MasafumiNakagawa.jpg"

Recently the image "MasafumiNakagawa.jpg" was deleted from Wikimedia Commons, which I had uploaded. The picture was supplied from Dr. Masafumi Nakagawa (中川雅文) himself with a word of copyright free. Therefore I uploaded it as my own picture which is handed over personally from the image owner. Is this a copyright violaton case? If so, how do I re-upload it properly? Thank you for your advice in advance. Cf: the page 中川雅文 in ja.wikipedia (https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E4%B8%AD%E5%B7%9D%E9%9B%85%E6%96%87&action=history) --IyataYada (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

To Túrelio: I uploaded a new image which is new on the Web. See "File:MasafumiNakagawaMD.jpg" for the detail. Thank you --IyataYada (talk) 16:06, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi @IyataYada, it took some time to reply, as I was busy with other things.

With regard to the currently deleted File:MasafumiNakagawa.jpg: it was likely not shot by Dr. Nakagawa himself, right? So, if you want to have it undeleted, you need to ask him who shot it and whether he (Nakagawa) has really the full copyright over it. If he has, then he should send a confirmation of the choosen license (cc-by-sa-4.0) from his business email address to [email protected] (VRTS). If he has not, then he needs to ask the photographer to send such a confirmation to VRTS. (You can find a template for such a confirmation here: Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file). --Túrelio (talk) 21:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

To Túrelio: I gave up this image. I prefer new image upload to re-upload of this image, because new one is better than this. Danke!--IyataYada (talk) 00:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Dr. Nakagawa's picture again: Additional explanation

I found the site ”https://researchmap.jp/masafu3_naka/cover_picture.jpeg” but this might be a mirror site. Visit ”https://researchmap.jp/masafu3_naka/" instead of "https://researchmap.jp/masafu3_naka/cover_picture.jpeg," you'll find no image page, because the "researchmap.jp" violated the copyright of the image (Dr. Masafumi Nakagawaa). However, my picture on Wikimedia Commons is my own because Dr. Nakagawa gave me for the purpose of upload to the Wikimedia Commons. Thank you again! --IyataYada (talk) 16:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

To Túrelio: I uploaded a new image which is new on the Web. See "File:MasafumiNakagawaMD.jpg" for the detail. Thank you --IyataYada (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi @IyataYada,

for the new image, the same procedure as described above is required. So, Mr. Hirofumi Nakagawa needs to send a confirmation of the choosen license for this image from his official email address to [email protected] (VRTS). My personal advise: do not use a CC-Zero license for portraits of living persons, as you give up nearly all your rights. Better choose a CC-BY-SA license. --Túrelio (talk) 21:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

To Túrelio: I asked the original photographer for an Email confirmation of copyright transfer limited to the Wikimedia use. Vielen Dank!!!--IyataYada (talk) 00:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Фото

Доброго дня. Ті фото, що ви хочете видалити, мої власні. Так ми їх розміщували раніше, аде це наші фото, і ми маємо повне право. Lizabenet777 (talk) 04:52, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

You need to specify about which images you are talking. Otherwise, I can't comment. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

pics source

Túrelio hi, I took these pics from the author's website where he put a note allowing FLA usage:

"Images and screenshots on this webpage are distributed under the Free Art License. You are free to redistribute it and/or modify it according to the terms of this license. ArtLibre.org"

--Ghost of Shamil (talk) 06:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ghost of Shamil,

you claimed to be the author of these photos. If you took them from somewhere else, you cannot claim them as own work and you need to mention the source. --Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of "File:A Juggler's Tale Cover Art.jpg"

Hi Túrelio,

thank you for your work! You recently deleted the cover image for our game "A Juggler's Tale", which I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons so that websites and press outlets can use the correct cover. I also wrote to [email protected] (Ticket#2021092110005793) to clear that we are the actual devs of the game making the cover available here. Could you look into this? We would be very happy if this file is undeleted again :) Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaleidoscube (talk • contribs) 12:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Kaleidoscube,

the file has already been restored by one of our OTRS-volunteers, who has processed your permission. Next time, when you upload material requiring permission, and have already sent one to OTRS, add {{OTRS pending}} to the image-page. --Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Thx

Hallo, ein kleines Dankeschön für das schnelle Service. Gruß - Bwag (talk) 20:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleting duplicate

Hi Túrelio. You have deleted File:Under Secretary Nuland Meets With EU European External Action Service Deputy Secretary General and Political Director Enrique Mora (51500279004).jpg, File:Under Secretary Nuland Meets With EU European External Action Service Deputy Secretary General and Political Director Enrique Mora (51498769267).jpg and File:Under Secretary Nuland Meets With EU European External Action Service Deputy Secretary General and Political Director Enrique Mora (51499789523).jpg, but please look at the time of upload, it is my upload first, so please restore them and delete the one upload by RandomUserGuy1738. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi A1Cafel,

I've re-checked the upload-dates of the 3 pairs. All were uploaded the same day, just 2-3 hours apart. So, is it really worth the effort? --Túrelio (talk) 10:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

If you think that's fine, I have nothing to say. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

piston-propeller engines

Guten Tag. Erst einmal ganz herzlichen Dank für die zahlreiche Mithilfe bei Löschungen nicht mehr benötigter oder von vorneherein unsinniger Kategorien! Sicherlich hast Du bemerkt, dass ich diese Funktion nicht missbrauche, sondern erst nach gründlicher Prüfung beantrage.

Ein allseits gleichermaßen bekannter wie unbeliebter Mensch hatte nach seinem üblichen Motto der Massenproduktion neuer Kategorien "drop & forget" auch neue Unterkategorien zu "piston engines" hinzu erfunden, nämlich jede Menge mit "piston-propeller engines". Nun ist es aber so und wieder mal ein Produkt seiner fehlenden Sachkunde, dass Flugzeuge mit Kolbenmotoren immer durch Propeller angetrieben werden. Das wäre so, als würde man neue Unterkategorien erfinden wie "Düsen-Strahltriebwerk-Jets".

Dies nur als Erklärung für meine mühsamen Zurücksortierungen und Löschanträge für die Kats mit "piston-propeller engines", von denen - dies als Vorwarnung - allmählich noch eine ganze Reihe folgen müssen. --- Herzliche Grüße --Uli Elch (talk) 14:11, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

File:Kim Eung-Su.jpg

I don’t understand. I have a copyright of that logo, and I’ve got permission from Kim Eung-Su himself directly. Muodraa (talk) 13:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

you need to provide evidence for that claim. Per our policy it's required that the author or copyright-holder him/herself sends a statement of permission to [email protected] (OTRS). To facilitate this, you should copy the boxed text in Commons:Email templates#Email message template for release of rights to a file, add the filename of the image and mail this template to Kim Eung-Su. Then ask him to read and sign it and to sent it from his official email address to the above cited address. --Túrelio (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Not duplicate artworks

Hi Túrelio, File:Giovanni bellini, madonna di brera, 1510, 01 adjusted.JPG is completely different colors than File:Giovanni bellini, madonna di brera, 1510, 01.jpg. You shouldn't delete those kind of cases as a duplicate. Multichill (talk) 16:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Multichill, ok. Though my deletion wasn't based on that, should we have 2 color-different versions of the same painting? --Túrelio (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Picture deleted File:Maestro Nery Cano Arreaga.jpg

Hi Túrelio,

I am working on the article Nery Cano. I attached a picture that previously the daughter of the master Nery Cano (who died two months ago), gave me for this article. Her name is Patricia Cano. The picture was taken by her. She lives in Guatemala City and she and her husband have a small company called ̊"APC Fotografía", which has a facebook page onlyː https://www.facebook.com/alexanderypatriciafoto Their website is not working anymore.

Patricia Cano (Master Nery Cano's daughter) authorized me to publish the picture in the article. She is still in grieve, but she gave her contacts for any questionː Personal emailː <censored> Company emailː <censored> Facebook pageː https://www.facebook.com/alexanderypatriciafoto

Do you think that an email from her could work for the permission?

I am a journalist and I'm attached to my professional ethics.

Thanks a lot for your attention. --Claudysagal (talk) 01:20, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Claudysagal,

sure. Please go to Commons:Modelos de mensajes#Declaración de permiso para todas las peticiones and copy the text in the square. Then paste the filename of the (deleted) image at NOMBRE DE LA OBRA and send the completed permission-template to Patricia. Ask her to read it and, if she consents, to put her name and the date under the declaration and email it from her official email address to [email protected] or [email protected] . --Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Image deleted is mine

The image of rice pudding « リオレ »that was deleted the other day is an image by me. If it is a problem because it is published on other people's Twitter first, is it okay if the image is from a different angle? File:リオレ_小泉敦子.jpg. CookForJapan (talk) 01:46, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Túrelio. Thank you for your daily management activities at Commons. I am pleased to inform you that now discussing the deleted image at talk page. Thank you.--Krorokeroro (talk) 05:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi CookForJapan and Krorokeroro,

it's good that the case is discussed among native-speakers of the same language. If there is an acceptable explaination, I can undelete the image. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Herne Baudenkmal 455 Siedlg Königsgrube Hannoverstr. 10a 9852.jpg

Wie ich auf de-WP schon mehrfach schrieb: Bitte stelle diese Datei wieder her. Es gibt hier keinerlei rechtliche Probleme und wir löschen nicht einfach auf Zuruf von IPs, die angeblich Gebäudeeigentümer sind, Fotos mit hoher enzyklopädischer Relevanz. -- Chaddy (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Ich habe das deshalb gelöscht, weil 1) der fotografierende Wikipedianer offenkundig unter Realnamen arbeitet, was ihn einem gewissen Risiko aussetzt, und weil 2) der Fotograf, also keine IP, um die Löschung gebeten hatte. --Túrelio (talk) 12:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

"schon mehrfach" - ich habe die Diskussion auf :de gerade erst gesehen, weshalb mir deine früheren Aufforderungen nicht bekannt waren. --Túrelio (talk) 12:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Ich habe jetzt erstmal den Hochlader kontaktiert, um sein Risiko abschätzen zu können. --Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

BNS Abu Bakr photo

Hello, I hope you are fine. With all due respect, may I ask why have you added a copyright violation tag on my own photo?? Shariar 375 (talk) 13:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, if you look at the version-history[36], you will see that I am not the original tagge, I only modified the deletion-request. Any discussion should happen at: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bangladesh Navy Type 053H2 (Jianghu-III) class frigate BNS Abu Bakar (F15).jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

Can you delete File:Hoa cải trắng Mộc Châu.jpg for copyvios and all files from this category? These images were all uploaded by myself. Sorry for any problem caused.--Ltn12345 (talk) 07:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Please undelete

Please restore deleted revision of Category:June 1968 in Kiel, meanwhile recreated. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Please untag

Hi, you tagged the photograph https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stefano_Lo_Russo.jpg as with missing copyright information. Here is the page from the Comune di Torino that clarifies the attribution (CC BY 3.0) http://www.comune.torino.it/condizioni.shtml#copy I don't know if I should untag it myself or where to add this information. Thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by GiAbTankred (talk • contribs) 15:59, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hi, I noticed that you deleted File:Basheer Jones.png due to "No permission since 19 September 2021." I don't know if you noticed but there were 5 other images uploaded by the same user, all taken from the same YouTube video. All 5 have had a "no permission" tag since September 19, because the YouTube video they were taken from was not uploaded with a Creative Commons license. Can you please delete them? They are all over a week past the deadline for evidence of permission. The 5 images are File:Sandra Williams.png, File:Zack Reed.png, File:Kevin Kelley.png, File:Justin Bibb.png, and File:Ross DiBello.png. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 19:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Nils Grandelius

This image is not a photoshop – here is the link to this photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/184346544@N06/51541321857/in/album-72157719947571486/

Best regards, Jurek10 (talk) 11:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok. That was the opinion of the initial tagger. Anyway, it's (C) ARR on Flickr and cannot stay on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Deletion requests/File:Oliv Tempe, evening of August 21st, 2020, from A Mountain.jpg

Hi Túrelio, I am the original uploader of this image and deleted it specifically at the request of the author. While it is not controversial, it is time-sensitive. Similar images have been removed rapidly via G7 and I hope that this can likewise be removed asap. Thanks --Goldenroman (talk) 16:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Goldenroman,

you uploaded this image >1 year ago under a free license. Files qualify for G7-deletion within 7 days of upload. If you are indeed Brad Peterson and the presence of that name in the metadata of the image is the problem, we can easily remove that name from the metadata. However, then you should first confirm this identity per email to [email protected]. If you are not Brad Peterson, the image likely violates his copyright, which was the rationale for my DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Oliv Tempe, evening of August 21st, 2020, from A Mountain.jpg. If the latter is the case, you should confirm that, either on-wiki or by email to me or to [email protected], which would allow a speedy-deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Derivative work not deleted

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Periyar_E._V._Ramasamy_(cropped).jpg#mw-jump-to-license is a derivative work of deleted image.157.46.117.114 11:29, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of an image from H. E. M. James Wikipedia page

Hi Tureilio

You have deleted an image I uploaded claiming that it was a copyright violation. It did not breach copyright.

This image came from the National Portrait Gallery website which actually provides low res images, free of copyright restrictions, for non-profit making sites: https://www.npg.org.uk/business/images

I have checked with the National Portrait Gallery today and they have confirmed that they are happy for low res versions of their images to be uploaded to Wikipedia, so long as the image is credited as copyright NPG, which I did in the reference section.

Here is their email reply:

Please will you now reinstate this image on the E.M.James article.

Simon Edwards Esq (talk) 16:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Simon Edwards Esq,

the letter of permission clearly states "non commercial". But Wikipedia and Commons require all images to be free also for commercial re-use, see COM:L. In addition, you put your username into the author-entry, which is not correct, as you are not the author. The photographer Walter Stoneman died only in 1958, whereby his works are protected til end of 2028. However, it seem that some photo-collections such as the wellcomeimages.org offer some of his works under a Commonns-compatible CC license, see File:Leonard Rogers2.jpg for example. The same is true for Library and Archives Canada[37], see File:James Lorimer Ilsley1.jpg. You should do a research in their collections. --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

File:VladimirKeilis-Borok.jpg

I got this image from UCLA, they gave it to me when I asked them for a free image of him for Wikipedia. Kurzon (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Kurzon,

ok. But, as the image was uploaded in 2020, and did not carry any ticket/record from OTRS, it seems that UCLA did never sent the requested permission. In case you know otherwise, please ask at Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard for the permission record. --Túrelio (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Dark Green Storm.png

hello because you deleted the file that I uploaded for my profile page in the Spanish Wikipedia Dark Green Storm (talk) 21:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, yes. What are you asking? The file was without a license-template and you had neither provided an author nor a source. It was finally suspected a copyvio from https://www.enjpg.com/green-aesthetics-background-9/. --Túrelio (talk) 21:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Help

Hello, I can't put any picture on Wikipedia Commons, although I put all the details from where I got the picture and who posted it, even the picture that I designed has been deleted. You can look at my discussion page to see for yourself.

I might be banned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LatrBye (talk • contribs) 16:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi @LatrBye, no, you are not banned. But you have been warned not to upload more copyvios. Please study Commons:Licensing to learn what you can upload to Commons and what not. It is not enough that you just properly add information about source and author of an image which you have found somewhere in the web, when the image itself has not been released under a free license by its author. Please remember that nowadays every newly created image is considered copyrighted by its author/photographer. This copyright lasts, in most countries of the world, for 70 years after the death of the author. Anothr practical guide is Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

deleted pictures

you deleted the pictures I uploaded, but I actually did it for the company which holds the copyrights... — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuliaWuggenig (talk • contribs) 10:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Lies bitte mal was ich auf deine Commons-Disku geschrieben hatte. Davon abgesehen, habe nicht ich deine Uploads gelöscht, sondern lediglich copyvio-markiert. --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Undelete request

Hi Túrelio, you recently deleted Category:Organisms with objects as an empty category. If you look at the history, you will see that this page was originally created as Category:Objects with organisms, which is not empty, and then moved to the title you deleted, leaving behind the latter title as a redirect to a non-existent page. The reason that category was empty was that Category:Objects with organisms is entirely populated by a template, and the category name format is hard-coded into that template. My proposed solution is (1) undelete Category:Organisms with objects, and then (2) move it back to the original title, overwriting the redirect. Hope this is clear, and feel free to let me know if you have any questions. --R'n'B (talk) 21:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi R'n'B,

 Done, as requested (hope so). --Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Moving

Is there a painless way to move the categories 'Category:Cosplay of Asuka Langley Soryu wearing plug suit' to 'Category:Cosplay of Asuka Langley Soryu wearing plug suits' and 'Category:Cosplay of Asuka Langley Soryu wearing Japanese school uniform' to 'Category:Cosplay of Asuka Langley Soryu wearing Japanese school uniforms'? By that i mean without having to correct every individual picture? --Trade (talk) 00:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Not that I am aware of. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

File:6 blainehoward ss mg 9858.jpg

This file might be a re-upluad of a file tagged by you as coyvio in 2010 (as seen on uploaders talk page, file of very similar name). --Denniss (talk) 08:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

A user from Vietnamese Wikipedia believed files uploaded by this user might constitute advertising or self-promotion. All these files seem to be about real estate projects somewhere in Vietnam and are linked to some external websites (backlink?). I hope you can take a look at these images. Ltn12345 (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Ltn12345, over the last days/weeks I have deleted a lot of images from Vietnam under that rationale, which had been tagged as such by another :vi-user. Of course, I do not know whether the uploader(s) is/are acting as a spammer or in good-faith but with ignorance of our policies. In case my latter assumption is true, it would be good if you or other :vi-users, being native vi-speakers, could explain the uploader(s) what is o.k. to upload to Commons and what is not o.k. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:Vespa (zespół muzyczny)

Haie Túrelio,

wenn Du eine Kategorie mit einem "falschen" Namen löschst, stell bitte sicher, dass sie nicht in der einzigen Wikipedia die einen Artikel dazu hat noch verlinkt ist. Sonst ist die Löschung eine Verschlechterung der Wikipedia. Ich habe es inzwischen erledigt ....Sicherlich ^talk 19:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Ah, ok, ich war natürlich davon ausgegangen, das der Markierer, der die cat auch verschoben hatte, das überall angepasst hatte. Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Please "undelete" Photo_of_Rita_C._Richey_courtesy_of_Wayne_State_University_web_page.jpg

Good afternoon, Turelio:

I just noticed that you have deleted File:Photo_of_Rita_C._Richey_courtesy_of_Wayne_State_University_web_page.jpg.

I had contacted Dr. Richey requesting permission to use the picture, and she granted permission stating that the picture had no copyright as it was just a casual shot taken by her husband.

I,then, emailed to her the following: “If a copyrighted file is uploaded by someone who is not the copyright holder, or the copyright status is not stated at the external file's source, then the copyright holder needs to explicitly grant permission for the distribution of the file under a free license. You can send permission statements to Wikimedia using the release generator (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team

Later that same day (October 8, 2021), she confirmed that her husband had completed the steps on the release generator. Therefore, I am surprised to see that the picture has been deleted.

Please "undelete" the picture, or advise me of the steps needed to fix this.

Thanks in advance. Andrea — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrea Peart (talk • contribs) 19:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Andrea, it was deleted as there was no notice in the description about a pending permission. Next time, when you have a positive signal wrt permission, add {{OTRS pending}} to the image. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Restore

Hello Túrelio I hope you're doing well. Could you restore Category:Eisha Singh. Thanks --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 07:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Dear Turelio; I understand you have left me message on talk page somewhere, however it is nearly impossible to find it in all the confusing layout of the wikimedia page [design very badly thought out!] So please let me send a brief message here then maybe you can send response more easy to find? I am representing user GREYMANBY [yes the one that so offended everybody on your publication by honest portrayal of human male form. That aside now; my query regarded more a couple of files which were I strongly believe deleted unnecessarily ; in a way I believe was most unfair and done with no regard! 1; Twitchy Bird [small bird at a window]. 2; Globe nude and dance sequences[ webm video] Firstly twitchy bird' I never realised was obscene or even explicit [may be I should knit some pants for it?] next time I see it? 2; Globe nude dance sequences; is a normal almost idealistic portrayal of normal human [nude] form; it is NOT EXPLICIT SEXUALLY, it instead represents a contrast to other files, which are gone, by its too good to be true setting [archive video ] in a lovely field with blue sky [and no rude bits happening!]] This film is in tradition of the nude in art and was placed separately to other explicit titles deliberately so as to show a complete contrast to the male human nude representation as a moving image. You will not find that ideal setting now as that was years ago preserved on analogue 8mm tape. Forgive me for going on here in your 'barn star' box but wikimedia is very confusingly layed out [and with awful spell checker too} I am not usually this bad at typing! If the other files offended so much; I can put up with that. But tell me why a small 'twitchy bird. and incidentally a photo of a red poppy, and naturally photographed video of male nude form without any sexual content, have being sliced out of wikimedia commons for good? What will you be left with?? A few almost Victoriana bodies covered with pantaloons ? or for that matter many offensive still existent images which personally offend me too [of which age captions printed may actually be illegal}? Have a look and you will find two photos which I think are suspicious on the now emptier page on [Penis]. Sorry to say that rude word again..! Pleas Turelio don't take this personally; it is jut that I cannot find where to reply fully on the confusingly laid out pages.. So bare with my angst [I am not really fuming]It is the principal that matters. I am certain that I have truly being singled out unfairly to 'set an example' to others [possibly as far back as September?]. I still request my 'twitchy bird' and Globe nude and landscape WEBM video be undeleted. As I believe the process was undertaken in a confusing and unfair manner; and with not a little bit of a one person viewpoint I feel? Could it be [i do not like to say for certain] an abuse of one particular administrator's protocol as well [ I am not not saying it is..but?] In meantime let your admin have this note they can all read it.. in fact every user can read it as well. [I could always put a PDF file together with my complaint if it is easier]. Thank you Turelio for your time in reading here and for attempting to contact me which is not easy in the very poorly designed media pages. Also I could not find an accent to put on your name as it is not in the type setup either. Will my twitchy bird ever fly home to roost?Will that nubile unrude male human nude ever dance freely in the fields again? Thank you ; and at least a 'Barnstar' for at least trying to comment to me [wherever it is in virtual space!]. PS' as I await a no doubt ineffective result to my complaint; I shall knit some trousers for that small Dunnock bird when it it appears at a window [if I can catch it! as it is very nervous!!] ONE TIME USER GREYMANBY of WIKIMEDIA COMMONS OCTOBER 19th 2021. Greymanby (talk) 15:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Image

Hello. Why you delete my image?! Лишина Ольга.jpg Viktorikus (talk) 08:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Viktorikus

Hi, please see your own talkpage: User talk:Viktorikus. The image was found prepublished, suggesting it's not your own work, as you had claimed. Now you state it's someone else's work. The photographer needs to confirm the choosen free license. See Commons:OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

the deletion of a category and its images

I was wondering if Category:Goblin Market (Rackham) could be deleted and all of the images within.

I have a strong feeling that not only was the USA version printed at the same time, making it in the Public Domain since there is no copyright notice, but that it is actually and also a reprinting of an earlier work, whose records were lost in the war.

Those feelings cannot be confirmed, so they should be deleted until 2029.

If you feel like there should be some discussion somewhere, I am a strong believer in feelings like that and will comply. --RaboKarbakian (talk) 18:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I am not an expert for U.S. copyright. Now, I wonder what is the rationale for 2029? Christina Rossetti died in 1894, so, at least her poems should be in the PD everywhere. I didn't check who created the illustrations, but they might be of similar age. Anyway, if you insist (or want to be on the safe side), you, being the uploader, could also voice a G7-request. --Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

The problem is the Rackham illustrations. I have two books that claim this work was published in 1933 (the biblios are 1960 and 1994). So the last year of copyright is 2028. Rackham died in 1939. My problem with these books being the last word is that they also claim that the first publication of two other books of Rackhams were in the 1930's (he did a lot in the last six or seven years of his life, according to those bilbios), and yet, I have a dust cover advertising those books in the 1910s. Actually, about when the war started.

What is G7? I might have a voice for that!--RaboKarbakian (talk) 21:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC) OH! G7 is for deletion!! I was thinking it was a "Gray area type discussion", gray area describes my feelings about this.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 21:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Ah, sorry. G7 is the official code for deletion on request of the uploader within 7 days of upload, which requires no further substantiation, provided the files are not in use. --Túrelio (talk) 06:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Image

Hi Túrelio, Not quite sure what Cropperfield was doing but could you delete File:CPAM 1410 AM logo (cropped).png and undelete File:CPAM 1410 AM logo.png please as I think they only wanted the file cropped?, Many thanks, Kind Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. However, it was like this, as you can see from the history: Cropperfield had req File:CPAM 1410 AM logo.png for dupe-deletion to File:CPAM 1410 AM logo (cropped).png, which I had performed. Thereafter he req deletion of the redir-page. Before he had removed the description etc. from the first file. --Túrelio (talk) 12:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Túrelio I appreciate that, I see - but i can't understand why he wanted the original file deleted as he wasn't the uploader of it but I guess that's a question only he can answer :), I've speedied the other image :), Thanks for your help my friend, Take care, –Davey2010^Talk 13:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

I intervened here, as I can see some user requested to crop a file to reduce blank spaces around. I tried to do it too, but with crop tool I can't overwrite the file. If someone can help me for that.--Jean Ernest Pierre (talk) 17:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Indeed, I was originally asked to crop this and when I did I was told it wasn't good enough hence myself reverting. You're more than welcome to ask at COM:Help Desk or failing that contribute (not GAME but contribute) to the project until a time where the restrcitions on things pass. –Davey2010^Talk 20:41, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Since that I deposed my message here, I discovered that I can overwrite files of others with crop tool after four days. Soon as I can, I will crop it leaving a little bit of blank spaces around to not delete partial peaks of the logo (I know it because I've seen history of Davey2010 talk page). By then, maybe someone else can do it at your sole discretion.--Jean Ernest Pierre (talk) 20:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Problem to upload pictures 23/10/2021 TaishiboTaishibo (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I am writing an article for a celebrity and every pictures I m trying to upload are being refused.... What can I do ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taishibo (talk • contribs) 18:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Taishibo, always sign your posts (use: --~~~~). You need to search for a freely licensed image of Romy Indy; flickr.com might be a good choice. However, as Flickr has different licenses, remember, we accept only CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and CC-Zero. If you don't find an image, you might directly contact Mrs. Romy Indy, as she should also have an interest to have a nice image in her Wikipedia-article. Though you need it only for her Wikipedia-article, the image must be released under a free license, which also allows others to use it. See Commons:Email templates for a template, which Mrs. Indy must provide to [email protected] (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 19:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

G7 deletion revert

Hi There, This (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Boro_Phali_with_peacock_and_headgear_motif.png) was uploaded by me. Why does it not qualify for G7 deletion? Northeast heritage (talk) 12:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, because G7 means "within 7 days after upload". Depending on the circumstances, I sometimes take some liberty about the 7 days. But, this image was uploaded in 2020 AND it is in use. You are still free to open a regular deletion-request (non-speedy). However, the chance for being decided with "delete" are probably slim, as the image is valuable and in scope. --Túrelio (talk) 18:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Module deletion

Thanks for deleting Template:Equirectangular projection (G7). Could you also delete the corresponding module Module:Equirectangular projection? (It's not possible to use a speedy deletion template there.) Kanguole (talk) 23:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Redirect deletion

Could you please delete this redirect File:Flag of Mexico (1934–1968).svg, so this file File:Flag of Mexico (1934-1968).svg could be renamed to File:Flag of Mexico (1934–1968).svg. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Delete this File:Flag of Mexico (1934–1968).svg, not this File:Flag of Mexico (1934-1968, 2).svg, could you please restore the file you deleted. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 07:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Deletion Request for Gallery views

In regard to the exhibition views you have nominated for deletion: 1) Can you direct me to the copyright regulations regarding works viewed in a gallery? 2) Is it permitted to blur the works so that they are not recognizable? Thanks.Trouver (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, the problem here is copyright, as I assume that the shots were taken with the consent of the gallery owner. Artworks are copyrighted til 70 years after the death of the artist. Even if you legally buy an artwork from the artist, you don't automatically have the copyright of it. So, you can't make a photography and sell it (or upload it under a free license). This would require the consent (a license) from the artist (or his heirs, if he/she is already dead). Now, there is an exception from this copyright for works that are permanently installed in public space. This is called freedom of panorama (FoP), though it's terms differ heavily from country to country. For example, in the U.S. FoP-exception covers only buildings, nothing else. However, exhibitions in museums or galleries meet none of the two FoP conditions. So, if the depicted Artwork isn't already in the public domain (70 years pma), you need a permission from the artist.

Sure, you could blur the infringing artworks, however, many of the images would become more or less worthless by that. --Túrelio (talk) 17:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, all photos were taken with gallery & artist's verbal but not signed consent. I believe the artists have passed, but copyright is obviously still in force. They can be replaced with more recent photos of different exhibitions accompanied by appropriate consent from both the artists & gallery. Thanks again.Trouver (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Should have thought of this before: If the artists of the works exhibited in the gallery views are identified in the caption underneath the photos, is that acceptable, or will the photos still be deleted? Also, some of the photos have works that are hardly recognizable. Your response would be appreciated. Thanks.Trouver (talk) 07:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Just mentioning the name of the artist, which is even a moral duty, does not replace a license. Whether or not the admin closing Commons:Deletion requests/File:ViewingExhibit-2.jpg (which will not be me) decides to keep or to remain will also depend on the visibility of artworks and whether they are considered to be de minimis or not. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

NOT Copyright violation

Dear Túrelio you deleted my picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ANSKF.jpg

because you said (Copyright violation: Copyvio of https://www.facebook.com/299177186768550/photos/a.1633642769988645/3758262330860001/) which that page (ANSKF ) BELONGS TO ME I uploaded it on social media platforms .

thanks for your support

Alawi00 (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Alawi00, ok, but, honestly, how could I have known that Facebook-account ANSKF belongs to you?

Anyway, in such cases our policies require that from an email address evidently associated with Facebook ANSKF a confirmation is sent to [email protected] (OTRS). The filename or URL (on Commons) of the image should be mentioned in that mail. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Stamps of Azerbaijan in PD

Hello, Túrelio. Please, could you restore this file: File:Stamps of Azerbaijan, 2011-944.jpg?

See my comments at the page: File talk:Stamps of Azerbaijan, 2011-944.jpg. --Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 08:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

You are right. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 08:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:Seals of Lungwen Semen Olgerdovich

Is there a rule that the name of the categories should be exclusively in English and strictly coincide with the title of the article on enWikipedia? I've seen category names in Spanish, French, and Polish. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 09:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, see Commons:Naming_categories#Language as general guidance.

Personally I would say, if the item/thing of the category is known only in the original country and has little relevance outside of it, then the original language/name might be used for the category, as likely nobody will search for it in a different language. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

File:HeatherWatson2016 Wimbledon.jpg

I think you made this deletion in error. The user is a vanished account, and their username used to contain "Daniel" (I won't post their full username to respect their privacy, but you can easily find it in the file history of any of their uploads). They have clearly asserted that their Wimbledon series is self-photographed, and I don't see any evidence to the contrary. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:58, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Restored and converted the pre-existing speedy into regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Re

Sorry if I'm kind of a newbie on Commons despite the fact that I've been around for quite a few years by now, but isn't it enough to flag an image as duplicate if there exists a copy with better file format (in my case PNG over JPG/JPEG)? Also, is there any procedure if I want to replace a JPG with a PNG without asking for deletion then reuploading (so that I could save the file history). Thanks for your patience :^) Claudio Dario al Dopolavoro ☕ 21:06, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Claudio,

our deletion policy requires in cases of several file-format-crossover duplicates not to use the speedy-duplicate template, but a regular deletion-request to allow for discussion; see Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates for details. In case your second question refers to wikipedia, that may depend on the local policy. But usually there is no problem to replace an image in a wikipedia-article by a better one. In cases of doubt, just propose the replacement on the talkpage of the article. --Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

My second question referred to here on Commons (I only upload files here), because I've looked around for a procedure here (e.g. renaming File:<fileName>.jpg to File.<fileName>.png without having to reupload and ask for deletion) but couldn't find much. I'm reuploading many of the images I've uploaded years ago with new versions in png (since it's loseless, I don't like lossy formats) and in higher resolutions, so that's why I'm putting {{Duplicate}} in many places, I don't know if there's any better way to do this tho so any advice would be appreciated. Claudio Dario al Dopolavoro ☕ 14:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted picture of Tomasz Makowski

Hello! The picture of Tomasz Makowski, which You deleted is my own work, so I have all the rights to it. It was just my inexperience with Commons and licensing - as I am an employee of National Library of Poland, I thought that I will connect this work more officialy with institution. That was my mistake, and i understand why You deleted it. I will send the picture again, this time with proper license as my own work, and please don't delete it this time and accept the change on his Wikipedia page, as the current picture doesn't suit the present look and status of Tomasz Makowski, and definietly need changing. With regards Conla (talk) 21:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Conla,

wait. Better not re-upload it; it can easily be undeleted. However, first you/we should clarify the overall situation. 1) Are you intending to upload more images/material created on behalf of the created Biblioteka Narodowa? If yes, you should internally (Biblioteka Narodowa) discuss how these image shall be labelled with regard to the author, i.e. per the institution or per you as an individual. If 1) answers yes, you might also consider verifying your user-account as "Biblioteka Narodowa-account", see {{Verified account}}. This is not compelling, but might make some things easier.

Now, back to the deleted image: if it remains associated to the Biblioteka Narodowa, then an official from the Biblioteka Narodowa needs to send from their official email-address a confirmation to [email protected] (OTRS), see Commons:Pozwolenia for more. --Túrelio (talk) 06:48, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for reply. This is definietly one time situation, as it was request from Tomasz Makowski himself - he was very upset with his latest picture (and rightly so, as it was really bad, unfitting and outdated). It was rather urgent and important case for me, so i have already uploaded it again last night, this time with proper license and no association to Biblioteka Narodowa, so there should be no legal controversions. And thank You for information about how it should be done properly, until now I was only uploading pictures from public domain, so I didn't have issues with licensing. I'm sorry for causing problems. With regards Conla (talk) 11:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Foto Amelie Albrecht

Beste, Wat is het probleem met de foto van Amelie Albrecht? Vriendelijke groeten, Dirk Annemans — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirk Annemans (talk • contribs) 21:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I tried to understand that by myself, but I was unable to grasp the intricacies of the discussion on: nl. Anyway, as the image is hosted on Commons, the final discussion should run here.

Practically: the image had been tagged by an IP for speedy deletion. I have converted that speedy into a regular (slow) DR to enable a discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Frances Ginsberg Photo

Why is there a problem with copyright in Frances Ginsberg's photo, it has been uploaded from en.wikipedia site to tr.wikipedia with clear sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merthanyakisan (talk • contribs) 13:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Did you ever read en:File:Francis Ginsberg.jpg? "non-free". :en-Wuikipedia has an exception-policy for such material. Commons does not and cannot legally allow such material, see Commons:Fair use. --Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

photos de plus de 70 ans

bonjour Túrelio, vous mettez en suppression des photos de documents qui on au minimum 70 ans, souvent plus, j'ai mis pas mal de sources (retronews.fr, la BNF) sinon ce sont des photos des magasines d'époque que je possède, je ne peux pas obtenir d'accord de gens qui sont morts depuis 1932 et bien avant). merci --Jpbrigand (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Bonjour @Jpbrigand, sorry, I am not good in writing French by myself, so I have to write in English (or German, if you prefer). I have no wish to delete any of your uploads and I am aware that likely most may be in the public domain. But, you really need to to provide the source and author information in such way and detail, that any recent-upload-patroler can check and evaluate it.

Let's take File:Pomiane 2.jpg as an example: for the description you wrote ".. Science et monde ... 1933", which I assume is the true source of the photography.

For the source you wrote "Retronews.fr = BNF", which likely is the source from which you obtained either the image itself or a print. But, the URL does merely lead to the portal, not to the image or the newspaper-page containing the photo. If there is a digital/online source, it is indispensable that you provide a link (URL) to the specific site, from where you took the source-material and where it is described (information about author, license, etc.)

For the author you wrote your username, which is not correct, as you did not shoot the original photo. You may have scanned it or simply copied from the source; I don't know. The correct author-entry is the original photographer. Either the original newspaper or the BNF portal should contain his/her name. If you have scanned the image from paper, you could use {{Self-scanned}}, or, if you scanned merely the photography, use {{Photo scan}}.

If you are willing to correct/adapt the description-data of your uploads, I can remove the problem-tags from the files. --Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Kouider bounama

HELLO, YOU MAKE DELETE MY FILE File:تامر حسين.jpg ITS UNIQUE FILE THERE ARE NOT ON THE INTERNET .YOU MAKE MISTAKE FOR THIS I HAVE COPYRIGHT TO USE IT . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kouider bounama (talk • contribs) 19:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

@Kouider bounama, sorry, but that's not credible. The file has no legitimate metadata from the camera, which it would have, if you had shot the image. Also, you have used the bogus Flickr-account "wiki lover" for license-laundering of most of your uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio ....Sorry, I don't know that using Flickr is against this way. Can you teach me how to upload a picture of an actor legally? For example, a company logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kouider bounama (talk • contribs) 20:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

@Kouider bounama, logos are a complicated issue. If they are very simply, they may not be copyrighted. But that depends on the jurisdiction of the country of origin, see COM:TOO. But, if they are copyrighted, you cannot simply copy or redraw them and upload them to Commons. If you live in a country which has freedom-of-panorama exception also for other works than mere buildings and if you find the desired logo pinned to a wall/building in public space, then you could take a photograph of it and upload it under a free license to Commons, while claiming FoP; as I have done here: File:LogoHerzstiftung s6777.jpg. If that options doesn't exist, then you may ask the logo-owning institution/company/whatever whether they would release this logo under a free license (COM:L), so that it could be used in Wikipedia. Before trying this, consult Commons:OTRS for our terms. For further guidance about logos, sse Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Trademarks. --Túrelio (talk) 22:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

image use

Many thanks for message regarding use of the image of 'David Braid with mandolin' by Martyn Adelman. I have written to Martyn now to ask him to mail you his agreement of usage.

Kind regards,

Psai Basani. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psai Basani (talk • contribs) 10:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Victo Solé.jpg

Hello, I understand your meaning about the File:Victo Solé.jpg. It's published on the web site of Amnesty International Belgique franchophone, but your right: there's a @DR under the picture (which was offered to AIBF, therefore the confusion). So, I'll check if I can find another picture (or the authorization from the photographer), and the picture can be deleted (I don't know how to do it). At least it isn't on the page anymore. Thanks! --Phensmans (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Túrelio, I'm quite new on the system... Did you get my previous message on this photo? Thanks for your work, Sincerely --Phensmans (talk) 19:36, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, yes. However, in my time-zone it's already late evening. I've seen that you opened a DR, which is fine for me. If I understood you correctly, you've given up about the image at hand, and are trying to find another one, right? --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Exactly! --Phensmans (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Images

Those images I'd uploaded are better than the ones currently used (colour for Beth and more identifiable for Lauren. Please reconsider those deletions. Ava Bacon263 (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

And that justifies uploading images, which you didn't shoot, but which are in the copyright of their photographers/agency, under a false free license, which will expose re-users to litigation for copyright-infringement? --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

True, I have found them online (Google search), is that a problem? Ava Bacon263 (talk) 10:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Oh. I see you are completely new to the Wikimedia world. Please jump to Commons:Licensing and just study the two cartoons to the right. Thereafter, you can read the page if you want. In a nutshell: every creative work (photo, drawing, painting, etc.) created today, is under the exclusive copyright of its author/creator. If you use such a work without having obtained a permission (=license) from the copyright-holder, you can easily be sued and will have to pay several hundreths of $. Of course, the author/photographer can release his works under a free license, as many of our contributors (and also on Flickr) do, which then can be used by everybody, providing the terms are met. --Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Tekhelet ties.jpg

Zackdu (talk) 14:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)I am just inquiring about the File:Tekhelet ties.jpg that you deleted. I was wondering why you deleted it because from my understanding under the copy write laws I can not use the photo for commercial use or derivative works and my wikipedia article is neither a commercial use as it is not for profit nor a derivative work. So if you can please reverse your deletion of the picture that would be appreciated.

The image was released on Flickr under a CC-NC-ND license, which is not compatible with our policy. Not all images on Flickr are allowed on Commons, only those licensed CC-BY and CC-BY-SA, but not CC..NC and CC..ND. --Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

MEP official photographs copyright

Hello, sorry to bother you. I was looking at the official Member of the European Parliament photos. For example, let's take the photograph of the President of the European Parliament David Sassoli https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/official-portrait-of-ep-president-david-sassoli-9th-parliamentary-term_SASSOLI_David_official_portrait_p As you can see, there is no license listed, however the only copyright requirement is listed as "Identification of origin mandatory" which I understand to be equivalent to a CC BY generic license. Would you think I'm allowed to upload it to Wikimedia Commons? And if so, which license should I choose? Thanks, best regards GiAbTankred (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi GiAbTankred,

it might be read as you did. There has been a lot of back and forth w. EP images in the past. I would say, just do it. The upload might be contested and requested for deletion. But there is a basis for considering it sufficiently free. --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your input. GiAbTankred (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: File:Official portrait of David Sassoli, president of the European Parliament.jpg GiAbTankred (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Why was this image removed?

This image literally has no copyright and is considered a public domain image. Ordnerud (talk) 21:41, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

What makes you think the image has no copyright? Everything above a low COM:TOO is copyrighted. The video was created in 2017 and its creator is still alive. In addition: Different laws apply to Wikipedia/Commons than to the press. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

It is a screenshot from a video uploaded online in December 2017 by a mass murderer located in Norway (no:Espen Andersen Bråthen) who recently murdered five innocent people. The creator has not copyrighted the video, and according to COM:Norway "Photographs that depict a person cannot be reproduced or displayed publicly without the consent of the person depicted, except when [..] the image has a current and general interest", and the image and person is clearly a current and general interest. Ordnerud (talk) 20:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Ähem, there seem to be a lot of misunderstandings. 1) In very former times you may have lost your civil rights when being convicted for certain crimes. AFAIK, this no longer happens, and surely not in Europe. 2) A creator does not need to "copyright" a work, whatever you mean by that. The copyright is with him automatically. He can give it up in certain jurisdictions, but that requires a separate legal act. 3) The statement, which you cite, has nothing to do with copyright; it's about the personality-rights of the depicted person. --Túrelio (talk) 21:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

I don't know on which project you wanted to use this image. Some projects, such as :en-Wikipedia, have so-called exception policies, which allow the local use of unfree images, better known as "fair use". You should find out whether there is such a rule on your target project. However, such images need to be uploaded locally, not on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Re: File:Semper Fidelis.jpg

Unfortunately, I don't know who designed this statuette, regards W2k2 (talk) 09:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Well, then it cannot stay. It's a creative work and if the sculptor is not dead for >70 years, it's still in his copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Even if it's a work photo? W2k2 (talk) 11:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

What do you mean by "work photo"? As a general guidanec see Commons:Copyright rules by subject_matter#Art (copies of).--Túrelio (talk) 11:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Re: File:INNR okładka.jpg

The editor-in-chief of the Institute of National Remembrance Review will send consent to use the cover. It's enough? regards W2k2 (talk) 09:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, if he is the creator or copyright-holder, yes. My main concern is about the real photo used on the cover. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

The author of the cover photo is Franciszek Dąbrowski, deputy editor-in-chief W2k2 (talk) 11:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

The editor-in-chief sent a letter of consent to the following address: [email protected] W2k2 (talk) 11:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For both handling and further examining copyright violations. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:06, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleting a file

Hello @Túrelio, I hope you're doing well.

I nominated a file- File:Mowtushi Troye ( Mowtushi Binte Troye ).jpg- for missing permission. It is been 10 days from the uploader was notified and has crossed the 7-day mark. Thanks in advance for deleting. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here} 18:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Taken care of. --Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Bai Ling

Why was a photo provided by Bai Ling deleted. She is the copyright holder as it was a work for hire she arranged and owns. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:989:4280:3150:B039:FA51:C4D2:DA42 (talk) 10:49, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

What file are you talking about? --Túrelio (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:National coats of arms of Lithuania in 1990-1991

This category allows to structure files by period. Why are you deleting it again? --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Because it was tagged for deletion[38] for being empty. Currently it is again tagged for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Koh Talu.jpg

Sorry, I pasted the wrong URL in the coyvio tag. It should have been https://mgronline.com/travel/detail/9640000055181 . Not sure if the log item can somehow be corrected. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Photos of Mother Teresa for the Mother Teresa Center

+ LDM Dear Túrelio, Greetings of peace! I am contacting you from The Mother Teresa Center. The Mother Teresa of Calcutta Center (MTC) is a non–profit organization established and directed by the Missionaries of Charity (Religious Order Mother Teresa founded) to promote deeper knowledge of Mother Teresa’s life, work, holiness, spirituality and message through the preparation and publication of her authentic writings, distribution of devotional materials, maintaining of a website, etc. For more information, please visit www.motherteresa.org . The MTC is an extension of the Office of the Postulation of Mother Teresa which was responsible for bringing to completion her process of canonization (sainthood). We came across your beautiful two photos of Mother Teresa at a pro-life meeting in 1986 in Bonn, Germany on July 13, 1986 and are incredibly touched by the incredible way you have captured Mother in this image. We are contacting you now to request you to share a copy of these photos for our records and also permission to use if needed for our MTC projects to spread Mother Teresa’s message. We would also be interested in any other photos of Mother Teresa that you might have taken. Any information or detail about her is of great interest to us, much in the same way that the memories of their mother are precious to her children. Every photo, document or testimony forms an important piece in a mosaic in her rich life and the more pieces we put together the more complete the picture. We would be very grateful for your help in this and will abide by any conditions that you might have regarding our request. And here comes another special request. We would be delighted if you would be so kind (if and when your schedule permits it) to write for us a short testimony about your experience when you met Mother and took these photos. We would like details if possible: what were your impressions, and what was that interaction like and did she give you any message etc as we would like to keep this testimony of yours in our record. We do not use any other social media except email and so I would be so grateful if you could email me back as soon as possible with your reply. God bless you Sr. M. Callisita, MC Mother Teresa Center of the Missionaries of Charity www.motherteresa.org [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sr. Preseilla (talk • contribs) 08:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Wrongly deleted pictures

Hello, I noticed that you deleted several sourced pictures which were copyrighted under:Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Please restore these images and check the sources I provided. Such as:https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-020-01162-2

I am also informing other administrators, if there was a possibility personal motivated activity. Thank you.Mev Shreb (talk) 18:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

FYI: see Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Northwards_migration_of_Basal_East_Asian_lineage_(model_A_and_B).jpg. Эlcobbola _talk 18:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

@Mev Shreb, did you read your own talkpage? There you have all the required information why these images are not allow on Commons. "Open access" is a rather unspecific term, which does equal "free". Relevant are the terms of the permission (= license).

• File:East-Eurasian migration routes.jpg came from a paper[39], which expressedly states "This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND)." Per our policy COM:L neither CC-NC nor CC-ND licensed material is allowed on Commons.
• File:Basal East-Eurasian genetic tree.jpg came from the same paper[40].
• File:East-Eurasian and non-East-Eurasian ancestry (Eurasia).png came from a paper[41], which allows only non-commercial use[42], which is not allowed on Commons.
• File:Northwards migration of Basal East Asian lineage (model A and B).jpg came from a paper[43], which states "© Genetics 2016 / This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model", which is restricted to personal, non-commercial use[44].

All this information was made available to you before deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Commons

Following, the warnings that you have given me, I have noted them and will not repeat. The campaign I was involved in were not clear on the photos so I went ahead and uploaded. its still a learning process. Thank you for the corrections. My username is Faith Buyaki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faith Buyaki (talk • contribs) 09:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Вознесенский Д.В.png

По какой причине Вы удалили изображение персоны которая опубликована в других источниках с правом распространения ? Если вы не читаете по-руски, то воспользуйтесь переводчиком. Считаю удаление не обоснованным, прошу привести статью в нормальное состояние — Preceding unsigned comment added by Вознесенский Д.С. (talk • contribs) 13:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I am not convinced that the source-site really has the right to release this photography without restrictions, if they can't even identify the photographer. AFAIK, copyright in Russia may last longer than 70 years pma, due to wartime-extension. So, for an image from 1936 you can't automatically assume it's in the public domain already. Please take your request to COM:UDR. May be my colleagues come to a different judgement. --Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Header - Copy.png

Could you have a look at this please? Does this meet the requirements for PD-text? If not, it's a copyvio (not own work; copied from https://aspectus.york.ac.uk/}}. Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 13:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Apology

• File:Etnografiska museet Thai mask Vanadis 1884.jpg and two other images.

I am very sorry for the wrong deletion request due to my lack of confirmation. I apologize for the inconvenience. I will be very careful not to do anything like this. Please accept my apologies. Krorokeroro (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok. It was also my fault. --Túrelio (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

(Retrait du lien Claude_François_dessiné_par_Michel_Bourdais_en_1963.jpg, supprimé sur Commons par Túrelio ; motif : No permission since 16 Oct)

Bonjour Túrelio, Je viens d'apprendre que vous avez supprimé sur la page Claude François, le lien vers une photographie déposée par une personne nommée Kakupi. C'est très certainement avec juste raison. D'après ce que j'ai compris vous veillez à ce que les droits d'auteur soient respectés. Pour cela, je vous remercie.

Comme je suis l'auteur du dessin représenté sur cette photographie et que ce dessin est exposé au moulin de Dannemois, je ne vois aucun inconvénient à ce que cette photographie prise par Kakupi soit publiée. Pouvez-vous m'indiquer la marche à suivre pour donner mon autorisation. Je vous en remercie. Je vous souhaite une bonne soirée. --Michel Bourdais (talk) 18:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Bonsoir Michel,

as my French is no longer sufficient, I need to use english. That's a good surprise that you are indeed the painter of the portrait in File:Claude François dessiné par Michel Bourdais en 1963.jpg. To make it easy, just write an informal email from your official/business email address to [email protected] (OTRS) in which you state that you are the painter of the portrait depicted in File:Claude François dessiné par Michel Bourdais en 1963.jpg and that you confirm the free license, which the photographer has choosen for this photo. This way you give permission only for this photography, while retaining full copyright over the painting itself. Bonsoir --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Túrelio, Thank you for your prompt response. I will immediately follow your advice. I wish you a good afternoon. --Michel Bourdais (talk) 14:10, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Persitam Tamban.png

Hello and thanks for the response, how do I change the license of the football club logo? so that the logo is not deleted --Siddicq (talk) 14:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

the problem is that there is no permission for this logo. Images on Instagram are not free. Only the author or the rightsholder can issue a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Crystal Bayat headshot jpg

Why did you pull this down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbrcomm (talk • contribs) 23:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Because it is copyvio-suspected[45], as you had been notified on your talkpage User talk:Lbrcomm. --Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

File restoration

Could you please restore this deleted file File:Flag of Bulgaria (1948).svg, Thx. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 08:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you are aware that it was deleted as a duplicate of the remaining File:Flag of Bulgaria (1946-1948).svg? I can temporarily undelete it, if you need anything from the data/description. But a permanent restoration should go through COM:UDR.--Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio: I changed my mind, i really need it for something, please undelete it, thx. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Exxentric speedy deletion

Hi, I just noted that you marked two images for speedy deletion:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LegExx_Regular_Leg_Extension2.jpg
• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:18282_LegExx_3.jpg

I represent Exxentric AB who is the original copyright owner, and we have licensed them under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. What can we do to avoid their deletion? Thanks, /OriginalFlywheel (talk) 11:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, the company resp. their legal dep. should send a permission for all those uploads for which they are either the author/photographer or the copyright-holder. Use the template on Commons:Email_templates#Email_message_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file, add all concerned filenames, give the name/abbreviation of the choosen license (if the default in the template), sign and date it and send it to [email protected] (OTRS). Email will not be published, but can only be seen by our OTRS-volunteers. If they have sent such a permission, you may add {{OTRS pending}} to each image.--Túrelio (talk) 13:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

OK thanks for clear advice, we'll fix this later today. /OriginalFlywheel (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Now done. /OriginalFlywheel (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Regrettably a colleague has deleted both files already. Don't worry, the OTRS-volunteer who processes this case, will notify me or the deleting admin to undelete the images, when he/she has evaluated the permission. So, as of now, you don't need to do anything. --Túrelio (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, any chance we could have Category:KPulley and Category:LegExx recreated too?

Category:LegExx is currently empty. It could be easily re-created (or undeleted) when populated. However, "LexExx" and "KPulley" sounds to me like a proprietary product-name. While such cat-names may not be generally forbidden, they might be an unwise choice, as they may be considered as advertising. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hiddenfigures.jpg

"Something" is now present at the page, coupled with unpleasant accusations. It does appear that the uploader may have sent OTRS permission. The files is of Emunah La-Paz (who is the uploader using their name V Hubbard) standing in front of a posted of the movie "Hidden Figures". Timtrent (talk) 08:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

No matter. It has been deleted by another admin. Sorry to bother you Timtrent (talk) 08:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Logo Explodium

I'm the creator to these logo. I'm the graphist of Explodium. 2A02:8440:8340:B16E:C9BD:47D3:B61B:A0E6 10:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

In case you are Ascol57 (talk · contribs) and refering to File:Logo d'Explodium v1.png: please log-in when posting. As explained on your talkpage, you resp. the legal dep. of your company needs to send a permission to [email protected] (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Pics

Would you delete all the pictures I have uploaded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrs99 (talk • contribs) 13:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Ähem, are you requesting me to delete them? --Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Female figure.

Hello. This image Jordan Wolfson(NY.1980).jpg was taken in Stedelijk Museum (Amsterdam), and it's not marked as copyright violation. The image of the page Female Figure reunites exactly the same conditions but it's considered copyright violation. It doesn't make sense because both images have the same conditions. Enciclopedia1993 (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. Both have the same problem. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:PD & CC Commons files

This page does not exist. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference.

14:35, 18 November 2021 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page Category:PD & CC Commons files (empty. Then we can close CFD) (thank)

you have been deleted this category, but I've worked with logos in this. How can I find logos, categorized earlier in it?--Albedo (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

Category:PD & CC Commons files was empty before I deleted it. If you see a legitimate need for its existance, just recreate it. --Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

some of template categorized into. what of?--Albedo (talk) 09:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Its latest content was:

{{Speedy|empty. Then we can close CFD}} {{Category for discussion|1=Category:PD & CC Commons files|month=08|year=2021}}Lots of totals [[Category:Public domain]] [[Category:CC-BY-SA-3.0]] --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

It seems that Albedo is interested rather in where the files went that used to be in that category. @Albedo: Unless you know the file names, I'm afraid there is no easy way of tracking the new categories. Technically speaking, category pages do not keep a record of the content in the category itself because categorising actually happens on the individual file pages. By the way, when you add categories to a file that do not yet exist (red link), please be sure to also create the new category page. De728631 (talk) 10:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Goblin Market, revisited and maybe restored?

I had you delete some files, I think they were put into the 2029 stuff. I just read s:en:Wikisource:Copyright_discussions#USA_publication,_no_copyright_notice and it seems that having you delete them was premature and wrong.

I am not going to wait for more "votes" as the proof of compliance is there, and I am wondering what you (or another admin, of your referral or discretion) would need from me to restore the files (in addition to the apology to the extra work that is due to you from me).--RaboKarbakian (talk) 17:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

as they seem to have been deleted, though on your request, under the assumption of being unfree, I would ask you to open this as a case on COM:UDR, just state shortly the facts/events and link to the mentioned Wikisource-discussion. Also you should add a list of the affected files. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! I watched a little when they were removed, following links and such. They were put in some cat for 2029. Years ago, I heard/read that all "deleted" files like this went to some German server dedicated to this kind of thing. So, I thought they could just be put back. But I have been wrong about so many things!

If it will be easier for me to reupload them, I can do this.

I will go to that link and follow the instructions there, but can "consensus" over ride "legal" and "illegal"?--RaboKarbakian (talk) 15:09, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Scans_for_Goblin_Market As you suggested.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Murmansk Puppet Theater

Hello!

• File:Евгений Суханов.jpg
• File:Владимир Пьянков.jpg
• File:Натялья Петрунина.jpg
• File:Валентина Варшавская.jpg

It's cc-by 4.0. See below at site: "Все материалы сайта доступны по лицензии: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0".Insider (talk) 12:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. File:Владимир Пьянков.jpg, File:Натялья Петрунина.jpg and File:Валентина Варшавская.jpg could be traced to the source https://www.murmankukla.ru/. Though, there remains the question, who is the author? For the first image we have no source found, only the credit in the metadata. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

See this discussion. The author is also the administrator of the theater's website - Пётр Макаров (Peter Makarov). Insider (talk) 13:52, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Insider, I've no conditionally restored File:Евгений Суханов.jpg. Please add all available evidence for its legitimacy to the file-page. --Túrelio (talk) 11:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Status

What's https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D8%B1%D8%B3%D9%85%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B1_%D8%B1%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A8%D9%86_%D8%BA%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%85.jpg status ? permission granted or no ? CorrectionKSA (talk) 23:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I am not involved in this process. You may ask at Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Ethnic map of Turkey

Hello, I am involved in a content dispute about the following map [46]. I have reverted the map in a version where its legend and the colors used in the map were coherent with each other and were in accordance with the cited source. A user has repeadelty reverted me without engaging in any kind of discussion. I have asked multiple times that user to explain themselves on the talk page but to no avail. Could the file be somehow protected? Ahmet Q. (talk) 13:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ahmet Q.,

I have fully protected it for 2 weeks. Let's hope that helps. --Túrelio (talk) 15:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Ahmet Q. (talk) 22:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Glòria Sabaté i Marín.jpg

Hola, El dia 22 de novembre de 2021 vau esborrar la fotografia de la següent pàgina de la Viquipèdia sobre Glòria Sabaté i Marín. https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gl%C3%B2ria_Sabat%C3%A9_i_Mar%C3%ADn Aquesta imatge és una selfie que es va fer la mateixa autora i ens la va cedir, renunciant als drets d'autor. Abans de penjar la foto li vam deixar clar que al deixar-nos publicar-la renunciava als drets d'autor i hi va estar d'acord, així que et demanem que la tornis a penjar.

Esperem la teva resposta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saoovf (talk • contribs)

Hi,

this image had been uploaded with the claims "source=Enviament personal" and "author=Glòria Sabaté i Marín" by User:ToniAlvarez.

In such cases the (true) author or the rightsholder needs to send a statement of permission to [email protected] (COM:VRTS). On the VRTS-page you find a permission-template, which is available in different languages. What is important in such a case ist that the person who provided the image, gives a legally clear statement whether he/she really is the photographer him/herself or, if not, that he/she has obtained full rights from the photographer. The permission needs to be send by the photographer or rightsholder directly to VRTS, no forwarding accepted. --Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015, Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you had already uploaded a file this year, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--13:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Files that have wrongfully been deleted

I need some help, please.

These files were nominated for deletion and were deleted: File:The Chosen - A toast at the wedding banquet.jpg, File:The Chosen - Disciples at the wedding banquet.jpg, File:The Chosen - Jesus at wedding with kids.jpg, and File:The Chosen - Simon and Andrew on Galilee.jpg.

And the following have been noon nominated for deletion: File:The Chosen - Nicodemus talks with Mary.jpg, File:The Chosen - Simon fishes at night.jpg, File:The Chosen - Nicodemus and Jesus.jpg, File:The Chosen - Jesus touches the leper.jpg, and File:The Chosen - BTS Roman Authority.jpg.

It would appear that they're just lock, stock, and barreled copyrighted, but each file from the season one section is CC-BY-SA, as noted on each upload of the official Chosen website. It's kind of hidden, but it's there. On each upload, click the links on the source (which leads to the official Chosen TV show website), then, click the arrows at the top left hand corner of the photo, and it'll show more info on the picture, and clearly display the CC-BY-SA license.

Because of this, may these be undeleted, please? StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Addition

May this file be undeleted as well, please? (File:Dallas Jenkins.jpeg)

The licensing proving that it's free from the source is hidden too, like the other Chosen publicity material on Commons. Here's the source link: https://www.press.thechosen.tv/?pgid=judjmpl7-4f2d78a7-a342-4220-b154-b6379a88c8b5

Thanks again! StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks again! I appreciate it. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 11:12, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request

@Túrelio: Can you take a look at this? Do you think all these files should be deleted? Or we should decide case by case? Ltn12345 (talk) 14:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

"case by case" might not be necessary, but they should be divided into groups: monks, pretty young lady (model), praying girls, artist. As you mentioned "ethical issues", likely personality rights: I have the impression that nearly all depicted persons (except the monks) are models, not snapshots of ordinary people, even the standing praying girls. So, this is likely not a relevant issue. Currently the main problem for their usability (and thereby being in scope) is the lack of a (meaningful) description. IMO, the images of the praying/meditating monks and the praying girls are potentially useful, also the image of the incense-pot. The artist behind the desk might be, if used in an article. --Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio Your description "pretty young lady" is a bit worrying. Perhaps it would be better to use a more neutral description like "woman posing in various situations". Brianjd (talk) 08:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Bunch of deletions

Please could you delete every single one of these images from a known vandal and sock puppet on Wikipedia. Every single one of these images is breaking copyright. Thank you.

Images to delete: File:Charles Albanese.jpg, File:Ripper Crew.jpg, File:Edward Spreitzer.jpg, File:Andrew Kokoraleis.jpg, File:Robin Gecht.jpg, File:Thomas Kokoraleis.jpg, File:I11kzAIfPPAAAAAASUVORK5CYII - Copy.png, File:Eddie Mays.jpg, File:Flippen.jpg, File:Smithk.jpg. Thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 21:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. He added these two images a while ago as well: File:Turpinmugshot.jpg, File:Ronald Turpin.jpg, Not 100% sure if they violate copyright but I suspect they do. They were created in 1962 so clearly the copyright tag added is not correct on those images because they were created after 1949. Inexpiable (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Account still making copyright violations / Deletion requests

Hi. Sorry to bother you but this user is still making copyright violations and has uploaded one of the images you deleted again: File:Charles-albanese-prison-mug.jpg.

In addition the other images they added a while ago: File:Ronald Turpin.jpg, File:Turpinmugshot.jpg, are also copyright violations. The tags they added to these pages are not correct because the images were made after 1949 and the publisher was not a person and therefore has not died. Could all be deleted? Perhaps user be banned as well? Thanks. Inexpiable (talk) 08:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Ashley alexiss smith.jpg

Hi,

I just realized that you deleted File:Ashley alexiss smith.jpg as a copyright violation after I created Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ashley Alexiss Smith 1.jpg. I don't know if this is the same file you already deleted but uploaded under a different name. -- Whpq (talk) 14:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

I actually deleted that image twice today; was uploaded by Guffens (talk · contribs). The one in your DR is a different photo, though the uploader is the same. --Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

OK. thx Whpq (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

I made a picture with my camera and worked on the file. So I think the picture/file is mine. But if you say so I leave it. Guffens (talk) 16:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Uploads by user:Артемий Булычёв

Hi Túrelio, you've recently deleted some of this young user's uploads. Please note, that all other ones (except maybe this) are clear copyvios as well. --188.123.231.42 08:37, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Löschung eines Bildes

Lieber Túrelio,

ich würde mich gerne erkundigen, weshalb das von mir hochgeladene Bild (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wiccan_Priestess.jpg) entfernt wurde. Der Quelle des Bildes war die Lizenz zu entnehmen. Das Bild ist als CC0 gekennzeichnet, somit habe ich sowohl laut CreaticeCommons, als auch laut Wikimedia das Recht, dieses Bild hier auf Wikipedia zu nutzen. Zitat des Urhebers: "Free for commercial use. No attribution required." Die Lizenz, als auch die Quelle des Bildes hatte ich verlinkt - die Person die ursprünglich das Bild zur Löschung vorgeschlagen hatte, hat sich sogar nach Nachfrage von mir entschuldigt, falls ein Fehler vorliege.

Ich bitte um Klärung dieses Konflikts und würde mich über die Wiederherstellung freuen, da ich das Bild in einem meiner Artikel auf Wikipedia verwenden möchte. --Ruhrgur (talk) 21:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Ruhrgur und Túrelio. Hierbei gilt es zu beachten, dass Pixabay, wo das Bild herstammt, seit dem 9. Januar 2019 keine CC0-Lizenzen mehr vergibt, sondern eine eigene "Pixabay-Lizenz" aufgelegt hat. Nach einer längeren Diskussion wurde hier bei Commons damals beschlossen, dass die Pixabay-Lizenz nicht frei genug ist und dass nur noch solche Bilder von Pixabay hier hochgeladen werden dürfen, die dort noch vor dem Lizenzwechsel unter CC0 veröffentlicht wurden. Wie man auf der Quellseite sieht, wurde dieses Bild aber am 30.10.2019 bei Pixabay eingestellt ist damit nicht unter CC0 verfügbar. Siehe dazu auch {{Pixabay}}. De728631 (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Moin Ruhrgur,

sorry, ich hatte die ursprüngliche Löschbegründung desjenigen, der das Bild zur SLA markiert hatte, nicht korrigiert bzw. um das ergänzt, was mein Kollege dir dankenswerterweise oben erläutert hat. Dadurch stand auf deiner Disku nicht der eigentliche Löschgrund. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Uploads by Manishrajputphotography

Hi Túrelio, I notice that you have deleted at least one file uploaded by Manishrajputphotography (talk · contribs), File:Food Photography Service in Delhi — Best Service At Lowest Rates.jpg. Today I came across multiple additional files from this uploader that appear to have exactly the same issue that led you to delete the prior file: "No sign of CC-BY-SA license on given link", manishrajput.com. Perhaps you could have a look? Thank you. Marbletan (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Taken care of and user blocked by colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 11:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Bitte um Abschluss/Entscheidung zu Löschdiskussionen

Hallo Túrelio,

ich bitte um Mithilfe zum Abschluss von zwei Löschdiskussionen:

1. Staffelsee alte Karte
2. Vanuatu Gazetteer

In beiden Fällen geht es um von mir hochgeladene Dateien, die anfänglich von einem Bot zur Schnelllöschung markiert wurden, aus unterschiedlichen Gründen. In beiden Fällen wandelte ich den Schnelllöschantrag in einem normalen Löschantrag um. Im Ersten Fall ist dabei seit Anfang September nichts mehr passiert (außer mir noch eine Stimme für Behalt, keine für Löschen). Im zweiten Fall ist ein Löschantrag offensichtlich unbegründet, da die Lizenz klar im Dokumenet angegeben ist. Das ist zeitlich ein aktueller Fall, aber hier gibt es m.E. nichts mehr zu diskutieren. Viele Grüße,--Ratzer (talk) 12:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Objektbeschreibungen im Germanischen Nationalmuseum in Nürnberg

Hallo Turelio,

nachdem wir im Jahr 2019 in einer ähnlichen Angelegenheit miteinander korrespondiert haben, möchte ich dich bitten, hier Stellung zu nehmen. Vielen Dank. --Schubbay (talk) 13:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

<stöhn>, ich denke, das ist - als 1. Schritt - im Forum gut aufgehoben. Du könntest die Diskussionsbeteiligung aber etwas erleichtern, in dem du dort 1 typisches Beispielfoto (wie File:2021 — Zweite Julireise Mateus2019 Batch (176).jpg) sichtbar plazierst. Denn sich durch die volle Kategorie, mit zudem ganz unterschiedlichen Problemstellungen, zu klicken, wirkt eher abschreckend. Ich tue mich mit Schöpfungshöhe-Fragen etwas schwer und genau darum geht es hier m.E. Deshalb würde ich auch die Überschrift auf dem Forum ändern oder ergänzen: z.B. Schöpfungshöhe oder nicht? --Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die schnelle Antwort. Die URL für das Beispielbild habe ich eingefügt und den Text meiner Anfrage etwas moderiert. Ein Zweifel an der Schöpfungshöhe der Objektbeschreibungen besteht bei mir nicht (bei den von mir damals (1919) eingestellten Pflanzenbeschreibungen der Innenräume des Ökologisch Botanischen Gartens der Universität Bayreuth, die ich wegen des Nichtvorliegens der Panoramafreiheit löschen lassen musste, ergab sich vergleichsweise die Frage nach der Schöpfungshöhe ebenfalls nicht). --Schubbay (talk) 13:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for converting {{dupe}} to DR

I wasn't aware of the limitation on the file type. I'll open DRs in the future. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 14:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hey

How come u removed my logo? It is not copy right since club allow everyone to use online. At least u should ask me. WNkh (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you were notified on your talkpage. Nearly everything (except if very old) is copyrighted. Allowing "to use it online" is not the same as a free license, such as required by our policy COM:L. The creator or legal rightsholder needs to send a permission to [email protected] (OTRS) to be acceptable on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Why do you want to delete this image of Sadhana Ji ?

It's My Personal Colourized Images I'm Copyright Holder of This image 2409:4063:4D8B:1D11:0:0:24CA:BE02 12:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Log-in and provide the filename. --Túrelio (talk) 13:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Picture of Mother Teresa in Bonn

Dear Sir, I found a beautiful photo of Mother Teresa of Calcutta (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/MotherTeresa_090.jpg) of your authorship, with an annotation that I can ask for a higher resolution photo. If possible, please send me this photo in the highest possible resolution. I would like to use them in the charity work of the Polish Movement of Solidarity with the Poor of the Third World "Maitri" (in publications, leaflets, on the Internet). Mother Teresa, through her example, became an inspiration for the creation of our Movement, she is our saint patron, for many years we have intensively supported her works in Calcutta, we draw from her spirituality... In one word, she is a very important person for us. Thank you in advance and best regards :) --Muzyk98 (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Replied per email. --Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

File:PasayEmi.jpg and File:RAdvincula.jpg

Those photos are mine. I took it using my iPhone 6s. 152.32.112.250 09:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Then why did you say the 1st one is from https://mb.com.ph/2021/07/27/mayor-emi-bike-lane-will-help-reduce-air-pollution? And why does the 2nd one carry Facebook/Instagram code? --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Ponytails in the United States

You deleted this category under CSD C2 because it was empty. The reason it was empty is because Ruff tuff cream puff emptied it using Cat-a-lot shortly before your deletion. I think these edits should be reverted, and the category undeleted. We already have Category:Ponytails in Ukraine. @Ruff tuff cream puff: Why did you empty this category? Brianjd (talk) 05:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

• We should probably get rid of that one, too. There is no point to a category tree dividing images of ponytails by country. Ponytails look the same no matter what country they are located in. You can't tell what country a ponytail is located in by looking at it. There is no one out there searching for pictures of ponytails unique to one country. People who are looking for pictures of ponytails do not want or need to search through geographical categories to see all of the pictures. But please, if you find it useful, recreate it, I'll leave it alone. Thanks, have fun. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

@Brianjd, if there are enough, I would guess more than 5, images of ponytail-carrying people associated with the US, i.e. either per description or ideally per the image setting or a flag, you could recreate the cat. Just as a reminder, Cats are created to help people to find images. However, a subdivision makes usually little sense if the overall population is small. --Túrelio (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

I learned about this because my watchlist had 23 entries in a row where Ruff tuff cream puff removed files from this category. And those files all come from just one event, so there are plenty of files that could fill this category. But I accept their point that these categories may not be useful; I have nominated the other one for discussion. Brianjd (talk) 04:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Michèle Sebag.jpg

Dear Túrelio, I'm very surprised you deleted the file Michèle Sebag.jpg although the source, which was clearly indicated, is a file containing a photo from which this portrait was extracted (page 31), which states on page 1: "Except where otherwise noted, content of this report is licensed under a Creative Commons BY 3.0 Unported license". Please restore the file or tell me why I made a mistake while uploading this photograph with the Creative Commons BY 3.0 Unported license. Thanks in advance! --FreeCorp (talk) 12:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi FreeCorp,

I've restored the image. After checking the pdf document, the uncropped photography seems to be included in the CC license statement. So, you made nothing wrong. --Túrelio (talk) 12:53, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Removal of two photos without permission

Please explain your rationale for removing https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pagliaro_Selz_Hall.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mary_Fisher_Dining_Center.jpg. I took both of these photos myself and you cited "no permission" from "Halkin Mason Photography." Wikieditor19920 (talk) 14:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

I'm going to ask you to restore these photos immediately and save me the trouble of having to re-upload them from my phone. I'm annoyed at this sloppy removal of photos from a relatively active page, done without even checking with the user who uploaded them. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 14:47, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Let's see the facts. Uploader Goucherwebmaster was notified 5 weeks ago about missing permission for both images. 4 weeks ago, i.e. 7 days after the no-permission-tagging by my colleague DMacks and notification, I deleted them, as both carried a clear copyright-statement "© Halkin Mason Photography" in their metadata. Now, what remains from you accusations? By the way, why do you claim to have taken them, when they were uploaded by User:Goucherwebmaster claiming them as own work? --Túrelio (talk) 16:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Turelio,

I apologize, there may have been a misunderstanding. I previously uploaded two very similarly named files that were indeed my own work. It looks like someone from the organization that is the subject of the article decided to replace those with their own selected photos of the same subjects w/ similar file names, which it seems you properly removed for CR vios. I thought you had removed the versions I uploaded, not those that were replaced. The sloppiness here was mine, I should've checked. My bad! Thanks for keeping lookout. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 16:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

@Wikieditor19920, ok. Just to avoid further surprises, I've tagged another uplod of Goucherwebmaster, File:Haebler Memorial Chapel on the campus of Goucher College.jpg, which is currently in use on :en, as no-permission, as he/she gave just "Goucher College" as author and source. In case that is your work or you know about the circumstances, please eventually correct the entries, if possible. --Túrelio (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Not my work. I have a photo of the chapel whose author did provide permission (via FlickR). I'm going to replace it in the article since it's apparently on the chopping block. Thanks for the heads up, and again, my apologies for the confusion! Wikieditor19920 (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Also, my guess is that a photographer for the school is uploading these but perhaps forgetting to provide permissions as an author? Maybe a notice on their talk page would be helpful. Happy to do it myself if needed. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 18:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Incisione-del-1854-1855-di-luigi-litta-raffigurante-la-collegiata-nuova-di-san-vittore-terminata-ma-senza-cupola-con-di-fronte-il-campanile-quattrocentesco.jpg

CIao, la litografia è del 1800, i diritti fotografici sull'opera sono decaduti, o mi sbaglio? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teoriva (talk • contribs)

Hi Teoriva, I was somewhat misled by your CC-licensing of that image, as the source-site is under an imcompatible NC-license. Provided the image is a true reproduction of the original painting from 1854/5, the license should by PD resp. PD-Art, as we don't have expressed permission from the source. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Model późnośredniowiecznego Lwowa Ihora Kaczora - widok z góry.jpg

Hallo Túrelio, du hast eine Datei gelöscht, die von mir auf Commons eingestellt wurde, mit der Begründung, dass sie angeblich die Urheberrechte verletzt. Die Datei stammt von der ukrainischer Wikipedia und wurde dort als eigene Arbeit von dem Benutzer Яким (Jakim) [wenn ich mich nicht täusche] eingestellt, der mehrere Fotos der Modelle von Ihor Kaczor dort einstellte. Da die Datei als eigene Arbeit keinen Einschränkungen unterliegen sollte, habe ich sie in bestem Glauben auf Commons hochgeladen und verstehe nicht, wo das Problem sein sollte. Grüße --Mewa767 (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Could you please restore this file as it was tagged as copyright violation by mistake. This is truly original photo, done by user and authors of this article just "stole" it. Sorry for the inconvenience. --Renvoy (talk) 19:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I've restored the file. --Túrelio (talk) 19:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Please undelete

Category:March 1954 at Brisbane Airport was wrongfully emptied and marked as empty. Bidgee (talk) 22:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Oops, sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Could you please undelete the following;

• Category:May 1972 at Sydney Airport
• Category:January 1971 at Sydney Airport
• Category:October 1970 at Sydney Airport
• Category:September 1970 at Sydney Airport
• Category:April 1970 at Sydney Airport
• Category:October 1970 at Bankstown Airport

The user who is listed them for speedy is deliberately emptying them for no reason other than to get their user edits up, rather getting a consensus regarding categories with one or so images. Thanks Bidgee (talk) 13:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, though sadly some more. Not too sure why this user is removing files from them and having them deleted, it's becoming rather disruptive.

• Category:February 2016 at Adelaide Airport
• Category:February 2012 at Adelaide Airport
• Category:May 2009 at Adelaide Airport
• Category:September 2008 at Adelaide Airport
• Category:August 2008 at Adelaide Airport
• Category:April 2008 at Adelaide Airport
• Category:March 2008 at Adelaide Airport
• Category:December 2003 at Adelaide Airport
• Category:November 2003 at Adelaide Airport
• Category:October 2003 at Adelaide Airport

Bidgee (talk) 10:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Javadnazari کیست

جواد نظری کیست؟

او متولد ۳۰ ژوئیه ۱۹۸۲ میلادی و هشتم مرداد ماه سال ۱۳۶۱ در جنوب شهر تهران به دنیا آمد و تحصیلات خود را در رشته حقوق به پایان رسانده ولی از آنجاییکه علاقه زیادی به هنر منجمله موسیقی و خوانندگی و بازیگری و همچنین طنز نویسی داشت فعالیت خود را در موسیقی آغاز کرد و چندین قطعه موسیقی فیلم از خود بجا گذاشته است و همچنین آلبوم خود را با نام تشویش به ثبت رساند که از جمله آهنگ های معروف خود نیز میباشد و در رادیو نیز بارها اجرا داشته است وی در زمینه نقاشی و طنز نویسی نیز بصورت حرفه ای فعالیت داشته است و از این رو دارای طرفداران بسیاری میباشد و صفحه اینستاگرام او با ای دی jvad.nazari یکی از پرطرفدارترین صفحات اینستاگرام میباشد او هم اکنون دارای هنرکده بوده و مشغول به تدریس در رشته های هنری به هنرجویان خود میباشد

ا Amirkhosro69 (talk) 00:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Amirkhosro69,

images from Instagram[47] are not free, but require a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted File The Little Mermaid (1989 Film) Official Poster.jpg

Hi, If This File Can't Be Here So Which poster should I use? One was in English Wikipedia, I put the name of the file in the movie info box, but it did not appear in Farsi Wikipedia. تیرتاوافن (talk) 09:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi تیرتاوافن,

likely it was unfree fair-use material on :en. :en-Wikipedia has an exemption-policy, which allows such material under certain conditions. However, Commons does not (and for legal reasons cannot) allow such material. If the wikipedia, where you want to use that image, also has an exemption-policy, you could upload the image locally, i.e. direct on that wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for so promptly deleting six items relating to the not-out-of-copyright author Bernard Evans (1929-2014) which I had uploaded in error. Much appreciated. Storye book (talk) 18:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Dorney Park in 1961 and Category:Allentown, Pennsylvania by year

Just so you know, I created and populated all of the empty categories within those structures, but thousands of those edits were reverted as discussed here. I chose not to bother arguing further about it but that is why there are many empty categories that will probably be listed and subject to deletion. Basically, any change other than having them in the thousands at Category:Allentown, Pennsylvania by decade will be reverted. If you would like, I can list them myself. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:06, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

ElDado77 (talk · contribs)

please stop deleting or posting all of my work, I own these posts and take full responsibility for them. The images that are used are for a presentation of our Club to your understanding — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElDado77 (talk • contribs)

Deletion

Hi. Both these files are definitely not the users own work, please delete, thank you: File:Joseph-holt.jpg, File:Joseph-holt2-jpg-1551145465.jpg. Inexpiable (talk) 08:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 10:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Can you check if these files are qualified for deletion: File:Rome Marcelo.jpg, File:TinChing.jpg and File:DingSantos.jpg. It is stated in each page of the files there that they are unsourced. Thanks.

In addition, as these files are tagged as derivative work: File:RSPasay.jpg, File:WBTPasay.jpg, File:ICRPasay.jpg, File:JWTPasay.jpg, File:CCPasay.jpg, File:ETPasay.jpg, File:CCCPasay.jpg, File:JDRPasay.jpg, File:JAFRPasay.jpg, File:RRMPasay.jpg, File:MCDPasay.jpg, and File:AGCPasay.jpg.

NewManila2000 (talk) 11:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi NewManila2000,

I had checked the first 3 ones some days ago (and rechecked them today), but couldn't find any direct external hits. Let's wait until 12th; then they can deleted per the no-perm tagging from the 5th. --Túrelio (talk) 13:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. NewManila2000 (talk) 15:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi, can you check if File:RAdvPasay.jpg is a derivative work or not. It seems that User:AtorniYormeJKLlamera and User:JKLlamera is keeping on uploading works that are not allowed to be posted here. NewManila2000 (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi again. Can someone process the deletion of some files that I have mentioned here? Thanks. NewManila2000 (talk) 03:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Tool

I had to rename the files in a category with a wrong name. Is there a tool for mass renaming files in a category? Cat-a-lot does not do that.--Stunteltje (talk) 12:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

I am not aware of. Previously I would have directed you at User:Fæ, but he seems to have left Commons in August. --Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

O.K. Thanks.--Stunteltje (talk) 12:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Impfung COVID-19 Gewinnspiel, Villach, Kärnten.jpg

Hello Túrelio; the photo was taken outdoors, on 10 October Street in Villach and I have re-uploaded the new version. Best greetings --Naturpuur (talk) 20:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Naturpuur,

ah, das sah zunächst nach einem Handy-Screenshot aus, was ja auch beabsichtigt war, allerdings vom Designer. Dann könnte also die Panoramafreiheit (FoP) greifen, wenn das nicht nur ein vorübergehend gezeigtes Poster wäre. Weil es bei dieser FoP-Bedingung (dauerhaft installiert) in letzter Zeit etwas Bewegung gab, wandle ich das Speedy in eine reguläre DR um, weil das ein Forum schafft, die Sache in Ruhe zu diskutieren. Und mit etwas Glück kann es dann event. bleiben. --Túrelio (talk) 21:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Vish kumar vk 2021.jpg

Hi Túrelio. The uploader of this file has added a {{OTRS pending}} template to their user talk page at User talk:Sikhkuch#File:Vish kumar vk 2021.jpg. I'm not sure whether an email has actually been sent in yet or if the uploader just thinks that adding the template to their user talk page is enough. Do you think the file should be restored with an {{Npd}} tag placed on it instead with the "OTRS pending" template then added to its page? -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly,

as he originally claimed "own work", I would prefer to leave the file deleted for now. If OTRS/VRTS judges the permission to be valid, they will either undelete it themselvers or notify me to do it. --Túrelio (talk) 09:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thanks for taking a look and clarifying things. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Bolaji Owasanoye on Plus TV.png

Hello Túrelio, I see you deleted the above mentioned file for being a "screenshot". It was a screenshot quite alright but it was from a YouTube video that allows reuse. See here. Kindly review and rectify.
Princess of Ara (talk) 06:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Ok, restored. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Mehr images

Hey, it looks like images from Mehr News (such as File:Seyed Bashir Hosseini in Mehrnews agency.jpg) are freely licensed: {{Mehr}}. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Is this true for all images from their website? The statement on the website says "All Content by Mehr News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License". However, for the above mentioned image, the in-image caption says "Mehr Newsagency / Photo: Mohammad Khodabakhsh". --Túrelio (talk) 22:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

To me that means Mohammad Khodabakhsh is a journalist from Mehr. Feel free to start a DR if you still have doubts, but this is definitely not a speedy deletion IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 11:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Template:Unsigned

Thank you for using it, but please ensure there is a timestamp.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 22:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
	Your Information is Helpful Subashshamis (talk) 02:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

hasty deletion

Hello. You recently deleted the file File:The leggiest animal on the planet, Eumillipes persephone, from Australia—female individual with 1,306 legs.jpg as alleged Copyright violation. However, no matter how widely the photograph is reproduced, the copyright holders published it under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 in the original journal article. Please undelete the file. Thank you. --Animalparty (talk) 20:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi, wrt the image you are correct. However, the "own work" claim by the uploader is dubious and needs to be clarified or corrected; therefore I've put the file into Commons:Deletion requests/File:The leggiest animal on the planet, Eumillipes persephone, from Australia—female individual with 1,306 legs.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Ellen Pompeo and Jimmy Kimmel.jpg

File:Ellen Pompeo and Jimmy Kimmel.jpg was released as a Creative Commons Licensed photo by Jimmy Kimmel's team. Here is the source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyS_rifwYwY. Kindly resolve the situation ASAP. Suddhadeep (talk)

Hi, what makes you think that the YT source, which you provided above, is under a CC license? It is not. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Have you watched the video? In the video, he declares that he is uploading the photo to wikipedia. Please read what I mean. Suddhadeep (talk) 02:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Really sorry if I wasn't clear. The video is not the CC source. It is the proof that he released the video to the public. Time stamp 10 mins.Suddhadeep (talk) 02:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Now I've watched the video from about minute 9:30 on. Though the whole episode is really fun and nice, I honestly can't take this as a valid permission. If you want to "fight" for it, I can temp-undelete the file and put it into a regular (slow) deletion-request, which provides space for discussion and input from other. --Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, please do that. Thank you very much. However, their team uploading a photo clicked by them to wikimedia with the CC license selected and Jimmy Kimmel himself declaring he is uploading it should count as permission. I am not sure why you would think otherwise. This was already discussed once on the English wikipedia talk page, I am pretty sure you can have another discussion. Suddhadeep (talk) 00:07, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Done already. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ellen Pompeo and Jimmy Kimmel.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

File File:Papa Celestino V (cropped).jpg

online translation.

Hello, I hope you are well.

The file in question is a clipping that I mainly made, an anonymous user wants to change its name, if I do not accept. In the edit summary I already told you to stop, I fear on my own and / to be blocked, so I am writing to you to give me a help or solution. It also argues that only the reviewer can remove the name and that the copyright remains with the non-cropped version. --Marium Alberto (talk) 06:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This Special Barnstar is awarded to Túrelio by Gampe: Thank you for your work! Gampe (talk) 12:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas Túrelio
	Hi Túrelio, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,    –Davey2010Talk 18:18, 23 December 2021 (UTC) Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.

File:MANO LUDOPLASTIA.png

You may want to delete this again. 1989 (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Túrelio! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Smallworld Smallband.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind checking File:Smallworld Smallband.jpg because a file with this same name seems to have been uploaded, deleted, re-uploaded and the re-deleted more than a couple of times and you were the last admin to delete it? — Marchjuly (talk) 11:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

This file appears to have been deleted by Herbythyme so I guess that nothing more needs to be done. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy Christmas and new year holidays

	Merry Christmas and new year, Túrelio
	Hi Túrelio, Have a sweet and a safe Christmas and New Year holidays. Wishing you a colorful Christmas season. , --Contributers2020Talk to me here 13:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Weihnachtsgrüße

Hallo Túrelio.
Ich wünsche Dir ein gesegnetes und frohes Weihnachtsfest.
Hoffen und wünschen wir, dass das neue Jahr 2022 uns allen viel Gutes bringt.
Beste Grüße für Dich.Orchi (talk) 17:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Da schließe ich mich gleich an. De728631 (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2021 (UTC)