User talk:Mattbuck/Archive11

Archives October 2007 - June 2008 June 2008 - August 2008 August 2008 - December 2008 December 2008 - April 2010 April 2010 - September 2010 September 2010 - May 2011 May 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - March 2012 April 2012 - July 2012 August 2012 - October 2012 November 2012 - January 2013 February 2013 - April 2013 May 2013 - July 2013 August 2013 - October 2013 November 2013 - December 2013 January 2014 - February 2014 March 2014 - April 2014 May 2014 - July 2014 August 2014 - September 2014 October 2014 - November 2014 December 2014 - February 2015 March 2014 - September 2015 October 2015 - December 2017 Current

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare railway station MMB 05 67017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments qi --Rjcastillo 13:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Statue of Artemis

File:Artemis - Palatine Museum.JPG

I see that a bot has generated a link to my image a statue of Artemis on your user page User:Mattbuck/Sexuality/2012 November 1-10.

That is not a problem of course, but I am just curious to know what that bot is up to? Gaius Cornelius (talk) 14:04, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

The bot checks all categories that have Category:Sexuality as a parent (grandparent, etc) category and notifies me of new uploads. Clearly Artemis is one of those categories. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

I see. I have seen this statue a couple of times and on each occasion found it very striking and I imaging that it was technically very difficult to carve. The result is certainly beautiful. Happy editing. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 17:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Andreasegde

Hi,

I am discussing with a user who is now uploading lower quality versions of photos over older ones. I was trying to convince him to stop or change his method, but he refuses to accept the fact that his uploads are of lower quality than originals. Could you write a few words confirming that new versions are poorer. Beside of course, the tilt, wich this person corrects, but other factors get worse. disussion. --sfu (talk) 19:32, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Andy !

Hi, Mattbuck. Thanks for promoting "Baby Andy" and a few words to answer your question. This photo was taken in the Col du Tourmalet, which was a legendary spot of the Tour de France when I was 10 (just after the middle of the last century !). But this graffiti is only a part of a big set concerning the Schleck brothers and their team mates. For instance, on the day I took the picture, the COA of Luxembourg had been painted on a big rock, near the road, but was in a deep shadow, under trees, i. e. not QI for me... Some other parts were difficult to shoot because of other disturbing shadows (trees and cars). I took many photos but this one seemed to me the most significant : for supporters sport is sometimes a "story of love and hate", even if they don't always really know why. -- Last point : the photo was taken in august 2011 but the graffitis had been painted on the road in july 2010. That year (2010), Contador arrived in Paris with the yellow jersey but he was banned a few month later (positive test) and Andy Schleck became the first rider to win a Tour de France in... January ! -- Sorry for my English. Regards. JLPC (talk) 08:26, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB Y1 Melton Hall photo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 17:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aberglaslyn xWHR MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 16:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB S4 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good - A.Savin 16:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 75 55022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CA on the tracks in the lower part of the pic. A bit S-curving would be nice too. --Jastrow 20:07, 24 October 2012 (UTC) S-curving? I assume you mean playing with the contrast, if so, which way? Mattbuck 23:33, 24 October 2012 (UTC) Sorry, I was referring to this handy trick to make the pic "pop" a bit more. --Jastrow 18:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 00:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC) Good quality and good timing. --Jastrow 20:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 85 DR98923 20312 92032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 13:37, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yate MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. - A.Savin 13:57, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Mardi Gras 2010 MMB 12 Ruby White.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 20:07 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 28 158955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawlish MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Albertus teolog 12:51, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clifton Down railway station MMB 12 143620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 17:19, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB G4 Djanogly LRC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rjcastillo 03:47, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Gossam

Hi Mattbuck, i was busy taking photos the last days, so i couldn't do the correction of the Gossam picture earlier. Could you have another look please? --Ailura (talk) 17:04, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Promoted. Sorry to decline, I do it after 5 days uncorrected, which is usually enough time, and gets a definitive result. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:28, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

thx. --Ailura (talk) 14:47, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starcross railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 20:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 95 378216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Too dark for me. --Kreuzschnabel 09:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC) Brightened. Mattbuck 20:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC) OK for me now. --Kreuzschnabel 07:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

A cat for you

This cat needs lowering, I leave to your care, the cat needs to eat healthy things --The Photographer (talk) 03:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avonmouth railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB O7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «19 Sir Colin Campbell Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:14, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finsbury Park station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:50, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 22 43003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 39 395017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff MMB 29 Caroline Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB Y2 Melton Hall photo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Obvious copyvio is obvious

Thanks for your closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yogapee.jpg (although you neglected to block the deceptive uploader as requested). Would you please take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nudist couple walking at the beach.jpg? It is another copyvio. Two editors have voted to keep the image despite the fact that I included one putative source and another cropped version of the image which dates from some time prior to the upload here. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:06, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not blocking someone for a single copyvio, even if it is their first upload. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:13, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

This isn't intended to be a trick question, but how many copyvios does a user need to upload before you are willing to consider blocking them? Given the user's description, there is no question that this was an accidental copyright violation, so why would you not block them? Do you seriously expect this user to return to this account and contribute material which will not be suspect? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

How about now? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:12, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 10 378014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 06 357021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:11, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheltenham Racecourse railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 02:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf tube station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 35 153380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --The Photographer 15:38, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «03 National College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for a night shot. --NorbertNagel 19:26, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guildford railway station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Rjcastillo 02:24, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf DLR station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality in spite of minor CA --Poco a poco 03:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hackney Central railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 54 221125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redland railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 85 390107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --The Photographer 18:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Please re-review

Could you please re-review my File:Ruhrtalbruecke-Sonnenuntergang.jpg on Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list. I've tilted (thanks for your tip) and sharpened it a bit. Thanks! --Tuxyso (talk) 13:11, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 12 60007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 32 G-CODM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:04, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 13:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Rolf-Nesch-Bro-Over-Elben.jpg

It is strange that some "Mattbuck" without ANY evidence could cause the deletion of this picture!!!!

The copyright to the artwork and the photo of the artwork belongs to the rightful heir of Rolf Nesch, R.M. Hjelle, Oslo, and is published with the permission of the copyrightholder. The documants that proves this was sent wikimedia commons in 2006!

I find the communication on wikimedia very confusing, and don't know how to stop this image from beeing deleted. So please "Mattbuck" call back your claims and be sure the image is not deleted because of your actions.

I have replied on the image talk page - let's try and keep it all in one place. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minehead railway station MMB 03 9351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 17:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Washford railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:08, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp and good light. --NorbertNagel 19:27, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 47 220XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 62 158952.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done --The Photographer 15:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff MMB 30 Park Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 21:05, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 12 G-BEWX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments weak  Support. Everything is fine, but it would be much better to have illumination from your side. However, it was not under your control, I suppose --Ximeg 17:26, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portishead MMB 09 Marina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. Biopics 10:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare railway station MMB 20 57303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA could be fixed, see notes. - A.Savin 13:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 14:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC) QI for me now. - A.Savin 10:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Romford railway station MMB 05 321355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me - A.Savin 20:28, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is nice. Lens flare does not disturb too much --Ximeg 16:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB O1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Ximeg 16:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

e-mail

Please refer to your e-mail for two private messages.

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:11, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Um, what just happened?

Matt, I saw that you unblocked User:Othertree and posted your reasoning for the unblock on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Othertree. That statement, which seemed completely innocuous, is no longer visible in the history because you have hidden it. Was that necessary? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it was. I should not have unblocked someone who was blocked by a CU. In the interests of privacy, I revdeled the whole thing. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. All is correct now. The actions have been reviewed privately by several CUs and an Oversighter. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:57, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure how the second revision deletion protected anyone's privacy, but the ways of admins are mysterious. Is there any reason why the main account remains unblocked? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

As I said above, "All is correct now." Privacy prevents any further comment. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

If there is cause to block the Othertree account, there is cause to block the main account. I'm not sure how privacy comes into this at all, since none of us are identifying the main account or revealing the information that checkuser revealed. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guildford railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymington Pier railway station MMB 06 Wight Sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA, otherwise QI Poco a poco 17:27, 16 November 2012 (UTC) CA fixed Mattbuck 02:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC) Not totally gone, but good to go Poco a poco 20:29, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 21 150261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rjcastillo 19:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File:University Park MMB H9c.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB H9c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 16:24 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham Eastcroft Light Maintenance Depot MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thirsk railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 19 220033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me - A.Savin 09:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB R5 Business School North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 19:50, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymington Town railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CA fixed Mattbuck 02:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC) * Good quality. --Smial 09:51, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kings Cross railway station MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, but still good quality. --Smial 09:51, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB Z2 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymington MMB 06 Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:50, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nibley Lane, Yate MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dynamic range between sky and darker green of the trees is well managed. Probably slightly oversharpened. --Tuxyso 14:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishops Lydeard railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, suggest to lighten a bit. - A.Savin 23:25, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 23:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now Poco a poco 20:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 13:05, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aberglaslyn xWHR MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI - A.Savin 13:10, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI. --Selbymay 15:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «16 Aspire, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham Geospatial Building and Sir Colin Campbell Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA on column - A.Savin 23:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)  Fixed. Mattbuck 03:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC) It's OK for QI. - A.Savin 13:35, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB L5 The Exchange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very nice Composition! But a little bit unsharp on the right edge. --W like wiki 19:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Jubilee Campus MMB X7.jpg

File:Jubilee Campus MMB X7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FA2010 (talk) 18:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Jubilee Campus MMB X9 Café Aspire.jpg

File:Jubilee Campus MMB X9 Café Aspire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FA2010 (talk) 18:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Jubilee Campus MMB Y7 Café Aspire.jpg

File:Jubilee Campus MMB Y7 Café Aspire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FA2010 (talk) 18:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

File:University Park MMB I8 Graduation.jpg

File:University Park MMB I8 Graduation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FA2010 (talk) 18:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Help: no-FoP Italy

Hi Mattbuck. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawlish MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marylebone station MMB 09 165005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 31 444035 444025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 21:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 82 56312 57309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view -- MJJR 14:30, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Your harsh comment on QI

Sorry, but I cannot understand your offending comment on Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#December_2.2C_2012. You state that I "hound" contributors. Let me briefly reconstruct:

1. I declined because of ethical concerns. These concern matter much more (also for QI) that marginal CAs or other unimportant stuff. I explained my negative assesment in detail.
2. The Photographer answered that he asked and the person "agree[ed] to be photographed under this License"
3. I was not convicned, explained my considerations again in detail. Different opionos are daily grind on QI. Thus why not discuss?
4. The Photographer answered again
5. I made some clarification that I have not distrust in The Photographer, but general ethical consideration with this kind of photos.
6. In the end: Your accusing comment against me.

I think your formulation "hounding" (nearly the same as hunting) is not OK and I expect an excuse of you. My arguments were solely factual, no personal attack (as you've done). My position is: No QI at all costs. Please accept my assesment or discuss, but do not attack me personally. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I felt that your implication that The Photographer would lie to us was out of line. While I accept that there are personality rights to consider, you seemed to be taking it too far to me, however, upon reflection, I see you retracted most of it with your final statement, but still, it was enough that The Photographer decided to withdraw the image rather than continue the argument. I think we can both learn something from this. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

OK.  Done --Tuxyso (talk) 13:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Washford railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB K4 Business School North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colors and good quality. --Lucasbosch 19:57, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB U7 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB 69 Exchange Arcade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 16:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 63 221144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 90 158953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:55, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longbeck railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok to me. --Ralf Roletschek 14:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 34 50008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok to me. --Ralf Roletschek 14:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2009 MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality though I would like it a little bit brighter. -- Lothar Spurzem 19:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swindon railway station MMB 07 43153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment noise in sky and dust spot(see note), but acceptable imo. QI --Rjcastillo 13:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff MMB 31 Millennium Stadium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 15:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

File:H-rostovskaa-03-09-7674.jpg

I have already done perspective correction in this image, for it was shot from the belltower. Could you please explain, where is the problem? Maybe I will check the image again and fix it better. Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:28, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Buildings are leaning outwards towards the top. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I see now. Wow, it's hard to fix, as far as I see. If you could try and tell me the values for photoshop filter, I'd be very grateful . Anyway, now I know the problem and will fix it. Thanks a lot.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

It does not work. In Lens correction filter, I make Vertical pespective = 4, and the tops of the building on the left and right sides become narrow, but their bottom parts and the lampost in the left side drive outwards and look not narrow. To fix top means to distort bottom, and vice versa. This is because the image was shot from the level of roofs. Any more advice for me?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Huh. I guess maybe a warp, or split the image in 2 and perspective each bit individually. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Tried warp, tried squeeze. Thanks for the interesting idea, yet it does not help. Looks like some trouble from the source position of view, or some damage in the building in the left bottom corner. OK, the question is closed, I won't do anything to this image, let's assume it's a sudden fault.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 17 43018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB S0 Auditorium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Kadellar 13:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Coyau 17:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2009 MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rjcastillo 19:04, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:University Park MMB J4 Millennium Garden.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB J4 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:25, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackhorse Road station MMB 09 172007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 07:55, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 84 390107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 21:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «12 International House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB Q1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --A.Savin 11:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Bay railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI, true-to-life. --Isiwal 13:06, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 21 43009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Could use some advice

Hi there Mattbuck, I could use some advice on this issue --> User_talk:Cirt#File:Mr._Hankey_the_Christmas_Poo_says_Howdy_Ho_and_Happy_Holidays.jpg, any input you might have would be appreciated as I respect your views on these matters, -- Cirt (talk) 14:19, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. What about those that are Cosplay? Can those be kept? Can I upload more of those? -- Cirt (talk) 17:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Blimey, I hope cosplay is okay. Several of the Gay Pride photos I just uploaded this week have chaps dressed as Wonder Woman (or tributes thereof). --Fæ (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 86 92032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 21:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice colours. --Harsh 2580 15:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «27 Sports Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Bridge station MMB 09 465008 376007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Poco a poco 23:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:14, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Williton railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 20 150122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 16.jpg

Thanks.. Don't forget to close the 'related' DR's , same reasoning applies.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

I didn't know about all the others. You really should use a single DR for this stuff. Thanks for letting me know. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Also, haveing your user/talk pages redirect is very confusing - I checked contribs and thought "huh, nothing since 2011? wtf?". Perhaps you could consider using ShakespeareFan00 to make a null edit to User:Sfan00 IMG with summary "see Special:Contributions/Sfan00 IMG", or something like that. Would help deconfuse people. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:35, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB S9 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Rjcastillo 16:05, 19 December 2012 (UTC)lol--Jebulon 18:31, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 61 221144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB B3 Radford Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB 71 Market Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 43 395017 373XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:11, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 33 G-UPOI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --A.Savin 19:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kenilworth Castle MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polish War Memorial MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Merry Christmas !!!

  Merry Christmas !!!...Best regards, --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:08, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanway House MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit of noise in the sky, but good to go --Poco a poco 16:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

2013!

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Yours faithfully, George -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:09, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bethnal Green railway station MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality! --Tupungato 18:35, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 13:25, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot. --Kreuzschnabel 16:19, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kings Cross railway station MMB 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Odd perspective, but good resolved --Poco a poco 21:53, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB T1 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice colours. --Tupungato 18:35, 22 December 2012 (UTC)lol, as usual--Jebulon 21:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB B8 220XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 13:17, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymington MMB 09 Quay Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:49, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 72 55022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redcar East railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 15:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midland Main Line, Nottingham MMB 03 158906 43048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd prefer more contrast, but it's sufficient for QI as it is. --A.Savin 17:48, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Battersea Park railway station MMB 12 456011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:41, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Q4 Biology.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Queen Street railway station MMB 01 150229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 06:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «13 Aspire and the Amenities Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. For a FP I would suggest a view without those leaves. --Smial 16:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC) If you would like to crop and nominate for FP, feel free, but I won't nominate anything myself. Mattbuck 22:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC) Simple cropping would disturb the proportions, this wouldn't help. I only wanted to say that this really good image possibly could have been a great one with slight different camera position, if there is enough space to do so. -- Smial 01:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymington MMB 04 Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but acceptable --Poco a poco 19:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 38 43XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Half a second later (or maybe less!) it would be better, but QI for me. --Kadellar 11:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf DLR station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hackney Central railway station MMB 12 378005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toddington railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB E4 Tower Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Washford railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB W6 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Williton railway station MMB 01 9351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brockenhurst railway station MMB 01 444010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanway House MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good color and composition, well done. --Daniel Case 19:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 90 150263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice light --Ralf Roletschek 16:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bethnal Green railway station MMB 10 315807 315859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebbsfleet International railway station MMB 03 395018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please revert, you updated the wrong image. --Iifar 16:21, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Oops. Mattbuck 17:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebbsfleet International railway station MMB 08 395004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good composition but strong CAs --Haneburger 07:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 14:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)  Not done Green and purple CA on both sides. --Iifar 16:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I uploaded over the wrong file. Fixed now. Mattbuck 17:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)  Weak support --Iifar 11:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximeg 15:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB 85 Goose Fair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good one --Poco a poco 17:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB Z9 Djanogly LRC, The Exchange and Computer Science.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 60 43023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 10:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Niederwaldkirchen Blasiuskapelle - Fenster 1a Betender.jpg

Hi, I've done the crop and a perspective correction on this picture :File:Niederwaldkirchen Blasiuskapelle - Fenster 1a Betender.jpg (QI candidates of the 31th of December), is it ok now ? And also I like your picture File:Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 21.jpg, but there is a bit too much magenta IMO, otherwise I'd promote it.--Vassil (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Checking your image, fixed mine. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

I promoted. Thanks for your answer. --Vassil (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2009 MMB 00 «04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parson Street railway station MMB 21 221XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 55 158951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swindon railway station MMB 06 59206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pwllheli railway station MMB 02 158825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 18:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB K7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please add the species of the tree in the description and/or categories, because that's the main subject. --V-wolf 19:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC) It was a broken branch on the ice in the middle of a lake. I have not the slightest clue. Mattbuck 22:41, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Interesting mood nevertheless. QI. --Martin Falbisoner 12:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Magdeburg Skulpturenpark 2629.jpg

hi mattbuck, could you please explain in which image guideline the picture failed? looking like a toy is afaik not forbidden... thx, --Ailura (talk) 23:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

I'll go for that under composition rules and appropriate focus. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

i'm also not really content with the arrangement of the objects (and i definitely will not take the picture into discussion), but what's wrong with the focus?

• Every important object on the picture should be sharp, considering the idea of the image.
• The overall image should have clearly defined focus, for example, the main subject is in focus and the foreground and background are out of focus, or else, the whole scene is in focus.

--Ailura (talk) 06:48, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

The rules say: Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you can not make a decision, add your comments, but leave the candidate on this page.--Ailura (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

I have made my decision, you ask for 2nd opinion, that means discussion. You don't want it, fine. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC) -mattbuck (Talk) 17:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry if i didn't make myself clear, i did not ask for a second opinion but for an explanation of yours. That's what you did, so thank you. --Ailura (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 13 221131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «69 Netham Weir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Nice! --Moroder 17:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willesden Junction station MMB 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Rjcastillo 17:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice for a marginal PD-text case

Hi, just a heads-up that I have removed a tag you added to a Queer Nation poster. I think the PD-text that was added after your notice probably is sufficient, but if you think it is debatable, I'd be happy to explain that further in a DR. Cheers --Fæ (talk) 15:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

OK, let's DR it. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

No worries, will comment there later. --Fæ (talk) 16:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Martin Falbisoner 15:42, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Williton railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 15:28, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Rjcastillo 16:03, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Water transport cats

Umm.. This and this edit appear to be somewhat silly - one's a beach and the other is a gull - what possible connection is there to water transport? You might want to review that batch of tagging for any similarly odd ones...--Nilfanion (talk) 07:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

My bad. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Mattbuck. You have new messages at voy:User talk:Stefan2#Nowcommons. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brockenhurst railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 38 159102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is there any British train you haven't pictured yet? QI for me. --Kadellar 14:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC) I haven't seen any Scottish EMUs, other than a 380 which was at Railfest. Mattbuck 22:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC) Haha ok, I hope we'll see it here someday. --Kadellar 18:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

What does "shame lighting" mean?

Hi Mattbuck! Thanks for your positive review of File:Looper-Innenhafen-Duisburg-2012.jpg. In your second review you wrote "shame lighting isn't ideal". What is "shame lightning"? Do you mean lightning was not optimal in the shooting situation? In this case I would agress, additionally it was VERY windy at this day (see the flag). --Tuxyso (talk) 06:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

I meant "it is a shame that the lighting isn't ideal". Would have been nicer in sunshine, is all. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Info

This style user page is actually bot created spam. Delete/block on sight. Cheers --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Yegorievsk_Aug2012_listed_objects_07.jpg

Please, consider to revisit your vote, as the new version is not just a Photoshop correction but a full reprocess. Thanks --A.Savin 00:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

WP:AIV equivalent?

What is the method for reporting vandalism here, such as this?[1] In wikipedia they have a WP:AIV, but I don't see one here. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

COM:AN or COM:AN/U are probably the closest. When stuff happens to other prominent users, it's usually noticed pretty quickly. This seems to be part of an ongoing harrassment spree. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:37, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

OK, sounds good. I gather that activity of all kinds here is at a significantly smaller order of magnitude than at wikipedia. And when someone was calling someone else a "Nazi", my first thoughts were (1) wow, how original; and (2) where does one go to report those characters. Thank you! ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 12:57, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Pretty much yes. People think of wikipedia to vandalise, they don't know about Commons. Vandalism here tends to be more personal. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:30, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

That figures. Not really an improvement. Maybe just fewer of them. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 15:49, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 53 4468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 17:14, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «25 Canons Marsh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 17:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawlish MMB 16 South Devon Main Line (Coryton Tunnel) 220XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 17:38, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Humor

"Damn, scrolling that is a mindfuck." Not too many people seem to have humor in their reviews. Thanks for the laugh... --Godot13 (talk) 23:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB V9 Nightingale Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burton-on-Trent railway station MMB 04 66717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filton Abbey Wood railway station MMB 06 150243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Exit the train station, there is a world out there waiting to be discovered. I followed the advice of a friend in this section, it is sometimes good joke. :) --The Photographer 21:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watford Junction railway station MMB 07 390013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Z1 Humanities.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - though a bit dark --Martin Falbisoner 07:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

FYE

[2]

Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Bay railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bath MMB 20 Recreation Ground.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Overseen your comment, please take a further look File:Muelheim-Hochhaeuser-Hans-Boeckler-Platz-03.jpg

I've overseen your annoations. Please take another look on File:Muelheim-Hochhaeuser-Hans-Boeckler-Platz-03.jpg. Perspective is IMHO OK now. Thanks! --Tuxyso (talk) 13:36, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridgnorth MMB 03 Castle Hill Railway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Aguilas del Zulia.jpg

 Hi, Mattbuck.

  Sorry, I thought as was on a wall at the Sambil Maracaibo was valid, Thanks for observation.

--Rjcastillo (talk) 13:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Poco a poco 11:12, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawlish MMB 10 South Devon Main Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willesden Junction station MMB 03 508303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 09:44, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crowcombe Heathfield railway station MMB 05 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tight crop but ok --Poco a poco 11:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gotherington railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Kadellar 13:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB H2 Science City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Decline because I'm jalous you have FoP in UK. Good quality for me. Maybe the building on the right has not enough contrast (but I guess increasing the constrat there would mean not having a nice, cloudy sky). --Léna 21:07, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB I7 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality given the conditions. --Léna 20:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Léna 20:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 41 30 St Mary Ax.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:58, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 11 43131 43139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:49, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 30 St Mary Ax MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB R7 Djanogly LRC, the Exchange and Computer Science.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 09:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 24 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 08:26, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kings Cross railway station MMB 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare railway station MMB 21 57303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 29 222101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 21:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 19 221137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadows are very dark on my screen. Léna 21:07, 20 January 2013 (UTC) Duly brightened. Mattbuck 09:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB W8 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadows are very dark on my screen. Léna 21:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC) You're right, I've tried to fix this. Mattbuck 09:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC) OK for me now :) --Léna 17:56, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «I5 Bristol East Junction 43122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Persistent uploader

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#Jamjam625. Thanks. // moogsi^(blah) 20:57, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burton-on-Trent railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me --A.Savin 11:37, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finsbury Park station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney railway station MMB 06 150245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney Junction railway station MMB 03 73002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «59 Silverthorne Lane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:05, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

File:London MMB 13 St Paul's Cathedral.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Ecosport.jpg

Hi Mattbuck, What is unsharp in this photo? Regards!!! Ezarateesteban 15:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Uh... I'm honestly not sure I'd say there's anything in that photo which I'd call sharp, so, to answer your question, all of it. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «F3 Chatteron House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 50 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf tube station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments See notes --The Photographer 20:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC) I have uploaded a new version, but I'm not sure it's any better really. While the object was distracting, it centred the escalator. Mattbuck 04:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)  Info QI Now --The Photographer 05:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 10 143605 150236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fix chromatic aberration and QI for me, please, see notes --The Photographer 20:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Done my best. Mattbuck 04:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)  Info QI Now --The Photographer 05:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheltenham Racecourse railway station MMB 03 5619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and intersting. --Tuxyso 08:56, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB T8 Lincoln Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «08 National College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:20, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 07 365517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment side right distraction, imho, cut be better --Rjcastillo 23:30, 26 January 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 06:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC) Support --Rjcastillo 13:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Question, request for advice

I posed some questions in 2 subsections here [3].

1. This image http://www.flickr.com/photos/kenny_lex/3189210759/ is probably fine to upload to Wikimedia Commons, yes?
2. http://www.flickr.com/photos/fezwitch/8259438213/ = is this one different enough as a form of satire and artistic expression?

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 00:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes but I hate you for making me look at that before breakfast. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:15, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Haha, lol. -- Cirt (talk) 13:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenford station MMB 01 165134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 17:26, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney Junction railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments See notes --The Photographer 20:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Brightened. Mattbuck 04:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC) * Good quality now. --Smial 13:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)