User talk:Mattbuck/Archive13

Archives October 2007 - June 2008 June 2008 - August 2008 August 2008 - December 2008 December 2008 - April 2010 April 2010 - September 2010 September 2010 - May 2011 May 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - March 2012 April 2012 - July 2012 August 2012 - October 2012 November 2012 - January 2013 February 2013 - April 2013 May 2013 - July 2013 August 2013 - October 2013 November 2013 - December 2013 January 2014 - February 2014 March 2014 - April 2014 May 2014 - July 2014 August 2014 - September 2014 October 2014 - November 2014 December 2014 - February 2015 March 2014 - September 2015 October 2015 - December 2017 Current

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB E0 395028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Florian Fuchs 06:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB B4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok --Poco a poco 08:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 38 43299 43296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harringay railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 52 158887 43071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now --Nino Verde 10:29, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filton Abbey Wood railway station MMB 33 150249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 76 158813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB S1 Chemistry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB 79 Nottingham to Grantham Line 158788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Re: he won't persecute the next until he's busy with the last

Or "as long as he's busy"? Thanks for letting me know, and feel free to correct my English mistakes any time. ;) --Nemo 13:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

photos of Phil Craig

Hi Matt, the photos I uploaded of Phil Craig, I do indeed have permission to use them. The black and white photo is his former official promo photo, for which Phil owns the copyright, and the colour photo was taken by me. Phil is a good friend who lives around the corner and all photos and material I've uploaded about Phil have been approved by him. Do not delete either photograph. If you have questions or concerns contact me direct at

John Cannon

OK. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northampton railway station MMB 06 350264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now imo. --JLPC 16:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 22 376036 375713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It seems a bit dark for me but good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:19, 02 May 2013 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worcester Foregate Street railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too much dark for me, but good quality. --Christian Ferrer 05:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Edgware road kearney tube

Hi, I understand the reasoning behind the deletion of Edgware road kearney tube.jpg. I only added this because there is precedent- there are several files like this which escaped deletion over the years, so I'm disappointed that mine was singled out while the others live on. What is to be the fate of en:File:Brixtonrailmap.png, en:File:Denham Map Mockup2.png, en:File:Northern Heights Map Mockup.png and others like them? All clearly derivative of the Tube map! Cnbrb (talk) 07:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

I did look through Commons's category of LUL maps, and I picked out those that I thought contained sufficient LU intellectual property. I agree with you on Brixton and Northern Heights, and have nominated those at en:WP:PUF, but File:Denham Map Mockup2.png is simple enough to get away with - the only bit of the LU map on it is a red line, a circle and "West Ruislip". You can't copyright the idea of making a tube map, only the map itself. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

OK, I understand. One thing though - the trouble is that the deletion log doesn't provide any notification on the Wikipedia pages where these images are actually used. It's really a fault in WP systems, but it means that image deletions are exclusively discussed on Commons and are not noticed by WP editors (who are generally not as active on Commons). The Edgware Road image deletion took me by surprise and I only discovered when it was a fait accompli. Not your fault of course, but I wish the deletion alert could feed into relevant article talk pages too.Cnbrb (talk) 09:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Barnstar of Peace
		I wanted to say that I really appreciate that Commons has administrators like you. Thanks! Sinnamon Girl (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Ooh, cool. Now to go burn some heretics. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stafford railway station MMB 03 221133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 03:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolverhampton railway station MMB 14 390044 221117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «57 National College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB D9 395028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the exposure effect on the "sea" of people.--Godot13 03:01, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long Eaton MMB 06 River Trent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:33, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit blurry and some CA in the off-center areas but OK. --Kreuzschnabel 02:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Ruislip station MMB 20 1992-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 09:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 09:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newton-le-Willows MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 21:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York MMB 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

2011 Deletion

I... have been putting off for quite a long time dealing with this because I saw the deletion too late and didn't feel like getting into a mess of requests and policies, and I must confess I was and still am completely baffled. So that means I have to contact the protest organizers who produced this leaftlet, which is by the way an historical record of one of the means used to pass the message, so they can confirm that it is okay to reproduce it? Well, thankfully they are actually easy to reach and so I've just done exactly that, and hopefully they will be kind enough to clear things up sometime soon. But... this is a pamphlet. Announcing a public protest. Which was *supposed* to be copied over and over and spread to as many people as possible. In my opinion, this was a bit of an overzealous deletion request.

Anyway, let's hope they can clear this up, and sorry for the two-year delay in actually saying something about it. - Ana Sofia Paixão (talk) 02:45, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back on this. I accept your reasoning, but I'm afraid copyright doesn't work that way - we need an explicit statement that the author released it under a free licence (or it needs to be uncopyrightable), otherwise we can't keep it. When you get permission, forward it to the OTRS team who will handle it. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 03 150148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice train. --Florstein 06:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dudley Port railway station MMB 07 323243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Kreuzschnabel 03:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 26 153362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starbeck railway station MMB 21 150118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirksworth railway station MMB 04 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment a bit dark --Rjcastillo 13:58, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Can't say I agree, but  Done. Mattbuck 00:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC) Support --Rjcastillo 14:12, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB M3 University of London Institute of Education.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Frank Hornby 150th anniversary materials

Hi Matt!
Regarding the "Frank Hornby 150" project poster and logo, they're uploaded with the permission of the Museum - we're required to share these graphics under at least the "CC BY-NC" licence so that other organisations can reuse them on their own materials to celebrate the anniversary, as part of our agreement with the Heritage Lottery Fund (who are funding the project). I should really also upload the bare logo, as a separate .SVG . I'm the FH150 Project Officer (you can confirm that my name's at the bottom of http://www.hlf.org.uk/news/Pages/FrankHornby150thanniversary.aspx ).

Regarding the museum map, that was created by me last year as a volunteer for the museum's use, and it's now in use within the museum as our standard public-facing map. The Museum's happy for it to be released to Wikimedia Commons, and so am I. I'll trudge off and send a couple of confirmation emails, as requested. ErkDemon (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC) (Eric Baird)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montpelier railway station MMB 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 03:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 12 66721 221131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 03:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB T0 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:17, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 14 43238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 17:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patchway railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the dark areas are too much dark but good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:36, 05 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 03 350267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect but Good Quality for me. --Christian Ferrer 09:41, 05 May 2013 (UTC)

Test on your picture

Hi Mattbuck,

You say you don't understand what I mean so I did a test on your picture (File:University Park MMB «04 Rutland Hall.jpg).

You can download it at http://we.tl/bSXs2YYHFb

Friendly

Christian Ferrer.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 12:05, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 76 170108 158796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:25, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 82 Marlborough Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 10:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harrogate MMB 02 Spa Lane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 09:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB B4 Middleton Boulevard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harringay railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hillingdon tube station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality & I like the composition.. --NorbertNagel 20:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB A0 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really sharp, but OK for me. --JLPC 16:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «M7 Bristol East Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 20:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloo station MMB 13 450XXX 450028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milton Keynes Central railway station MMB 02 350248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Bridge station MMB 13 376021 465237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 20:46, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB Q3 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice to me. --Christian Ferrer 16:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 28 43070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 19:18, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Croydon station MMB 11 378136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB K9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good--Lmbuga 14:46, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lawrence Hill railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 20:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stapleton Road railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 20:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hawnby MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much motion blur at the photo from the train window. --Steindy 09:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC) What train? Mattbuck 10:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC) Qualitiy ok for me -- Arcalino 21:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB F5 395027 395005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Gray as England can be --Moroder 23:39, 9 May 2013 (UTC) England is grey, not gray :p Mattbuck 12:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 01 G-CDMC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--S. F. B. Morse 01:22, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Undelete

You have deleted these 1 2 3 4 5 images without legitimate reasons, The file-image Zarb-e-Sukhan here, in this case all information and permission was provided to User:Sreejithk2000 in May 2012. I consider that all as a bad faith contribution. I ask you to undelete, if you require your concerns, I can discuss.Justice007 (talk) 16:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

The blog didn't say that the images were licensed as such. There was no OTRS template or other proof of licence. Whatever Sreejithk2000 was told, it was never added to the file pages. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Feedback

Hi Matt, how are you doin'? I still miss your feedback o my 2 pictures from April 29th. I fixed them 9 days ago but haven't got yet any feedback from you. Cheers, Poco a poco (talk) 14:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm stuck on an open wifi connection for the next few days, so I can't download photos really. Or at least not very fast. I'll look at them by this time next week, will bump for now. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality images of rolling stock

User_talk:Jtcurses#Quality_images_of_rolling_stock

Thanks, I'll look when I have time.--JT Curses (talk) 18:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Question

Hi, an issue was recently brought to my attention, and I'm curious if you see a way to address it within Commons policy. I'm sure you're familiar with the "toothbrush" search issue; this is similar. The first result for this search, which an external site has linked as part of its information about stroke (the medical condition), is a bit of a shock to most viewers. I thought I'd ask you because you're the only person who's put this image anywhere, and because I know you have a lot of experience managing files that involve nudity and sexuality. It seems to me that we would do better in fulfilling our educational mission if people could search our site for a word like "stroke" with reasonable confidence that they would not run into something that would surprise or offend them. I know that addressing that general principle is a big and complex issue, but do you think there is anything to be done about this particular instance? -Pete F (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Matt, I've handled this. I've also taken it to DR, I think it's a useless file given we have videos, etc available. russavia (talk) 20:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Much appreciated! Seems to me that the fact the old name is a redirect suppresses the preview -- I didn't realize it worked that way, and that makes a big difference. -Pete F (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swindon railway station MMB 05 43168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:22, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «K6 The Galleries.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 09:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «O2 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - there is however a hint of CA in upper image region. Please remove. --NorbertNagel 17:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Llandudno Junction railway station MMB 04 175103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 16 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «F2 Lamplighters Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting sign. Quality good. --Ikar.us 17:18, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney railway station MMB 04 150227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view. --Ikar.us 17:18, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «99 The Downs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The Photographer 02:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runswick Bay MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Poco a poco 19:06, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 30 153361 150127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 16:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highbury and Islington station MMB 21 378144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:45, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lincoln Central railway station MMB 08 153358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York MMB 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice. --Rjcastillo 14:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Question about scope

Hi Matt, question for you here in case you miss it. I was intending to ask you this anyway on your talk page, because I'm really struggling to see how Commons defines the word "educational". When I saw the issue raised there, I posted the question there instead. Hope that's okay. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

I was actually answering that when you interrupted me. *grumbles* -mattbuck (Talk) 14:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 73 222XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kentish Town West railway station MMB 04 378213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:47, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 12 390037 390046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Dirtsc 17:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 38 185103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 07:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebbsfleet International railway station MMB 06 395004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dark area in the middle of the image, but ok for me --Arcalino 19:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support surreal --A.Savin 10:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB D4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI to me --A.Savin 10:03, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support--Lmbuga 09:46, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «I3 Bristol East Junction 43122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Christian Ferrer 17:35, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 73 57308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 18:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leyburn railway station MMB 03 20166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 19:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountains Abbey MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I prefer the second description. If the focus of the picture is the portal, the picture is too tight at top. With the second description the picture may be QI--Lmbuga 10:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)  Support QI for me --Lmbuga 10:41, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountains Abbey MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:55, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 55 55002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 13:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Richmond railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice station. Good composition. --PJDespa 20:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 25 Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB X5 Café Aspire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments People look not into the camera (no implicit agreement for the photo is visible). Have you informed them of the publication? --Tuxyso 13:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC) I informed them when I put it on flickr. Mattbuck 22:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC) Then: QI. --Tuxyso 14:18, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB B7 SS Great Britain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 18 221139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Removing illustration for misogyny

Why did you remove the .jpg for the depiction of mass media misogyny of a music album picture of a woman being lynched? Why do you want to censor a definition of misogyny? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizabeth1848 (talk • contribs)

An image like that might be acceptable under fair use rules on en.wikipedia, but it is most definitely not acceptable on Commons. On Commons we accept only images which are freely licensed, meaning people are granted the right to use them for any purpose, including making derivative works or commercial uses. A Kanye West music video is definitely not freely licensed, and so any images derived from it are copyright violations. Whether it depicts misogyny is neither here not there. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:59, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for having restored my UserPage !

Hello dear mathematician fellow ! Thank you for having restored my UserPage !  :-)

London 70 meetup

Hello,

You recently expressed interest in attending meta:Meetup/London/70. Just so you know, following a brief talk page discussion, the meetup has been moved a week later to the 16th June to avoid a clash with WikiConference UK 2013. CT Cooper · talk 10:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Mi photo

Copyright violation. Who do you think is the author of the portrait of Joan Garces, if not me?

Best

rw

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lawrence Hill railway station MMB 12 220030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:31, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:53, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montpelier railway station MMB 17 150221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Christian Ferrer 16:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrews Road railway station MMB 13 66109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 17:16, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 15 G-CEKS G-CERC G-BZVU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though somewhat oversharpened. --Smial 09:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 01 180101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 19:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB N9 Ruislip.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:23, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 78 Smudge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newport railway station MMB 43 170101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 19:22, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --A.Savin 16:22, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB V5 Sherwood Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadows could be brightened a bit, but all in all QI already in this version. --Tuxyso 18:32, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB E0 Castle Combe Sports & GT Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 13:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishops Lydeard railway station MMB 15 4160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Ajepbah 09:29, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB N7 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe not very sharp at right but IMHO QI (nice colours, shot taken at the good time!) --Christian Ferrer 20:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham Autokarna MMB 07 Subaru Impreza and Ford Escort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Rjcastillo 13:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Low quality genitalia

Matt, I notice that you have made a number of recent deletion requests with statements like "low quality genitalia". While I think you mean that the images are low quality, not the genitalia, it would be nicer to the image subjects if you specified that explicitly. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 21 170103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 16:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rugeley Trent Valley railway station MMB 01 170630 350262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The track curve appears relatively flat. Is the cant really so great that the train is so wrong? --Steindy 19:22, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pickering MMB 01 North Yorkshire Moors Railway (Newbridge level crossing).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop not the best, but ok --Poco a poco 19:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 87 365511 365504 365530 365523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shepherd's Bush railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coventry railway station MMB 12 390014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Christian Ferrer 20:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Russell Square tube station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Christian Ferrer 20:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford station MMB 19 321365 321427.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peterborough railway station MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes railway station MMB 10 185123 144006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 20:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Bonner Münster QIC

Hello Mattbuck, I uploaded a new version of the image. Maybe you would like to change your voting? Thanks and regards, -- Wolf im Wald (de) 01:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Normans Bay

This image seems to be dated incorrectly

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Normans_Bay_railway_station.jpg

This line is meant to have been electrified by 1935. So this image must be post 1935 not 1900. See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Coastway_Line#Electrification

Regards Harveyqs

I wasn't the uploader, so you should probably talk to them, or you could edit it yourself. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highbury and Islington station MMB 10 378015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 18:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 53 43071 158887.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. --Christian Ferrer 17:37, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 22 185135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. --Christian Ferrer 17:37, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stourbridge Town railway station MMB 04 139001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Y5 Rutland Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not keen on the crop (esp. in the bottom) but ok I guess --Poco a poco 09:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 32 43301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dark areas are too much dark, look at the man in black, I can't see any difference between trousers and jacket --Christian Ferrer 20:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC) I've brightened it, but I think the guy was wearing black. Mattbuck 21:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)  Support I think it's better and it's enough quality --Christian Ferrer 05:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheltenham Racecourse railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 09:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes railway station MMB 03 185104 144006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support As usual I find it too much dark but QI --Christian Ferrer 12:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolton Abbey MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better Poco a poco 12:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Clevedon Court.jpg

File:Clevedon Court.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jezhotwells (talk) 16:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guildford railway station MMB 18 455725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Ajepbah 16:37, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice falls. --PJDespa 08:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 12 66088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:45, 02 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toddington railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avonmouth railway station MMB 23 150261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 19:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolverhampton railway station MMB 17 158820 158829 390044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 19:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Rejection of Wendy Maltz photo

Matt,

Regarding the Wendy Maltz photo that I was notified as having "missing permission information," I have asked her to send an email directly to the "permissions" email address to verify that she is the owner of the photo of herself.

I hope her email will suffice to allow her photo to appear on her Wikipedia page.

Thanks,

Todd Peterson

What is needed is permission of the copyright holder, which would likely be the photographer. Ownership of the photo is not at issue. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB H2 373231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PJDespa 19:27, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Yorkshire MMB 01 East Coast Main Line 185103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice--Lmbuga 08:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 07:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stapleton Road railway station MMB 21 150221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «04 National College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockport railway station MMB 04 221125 150215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB C5 Business School South.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 08:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matlock railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Nino Verde 09:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB C8 Middleton Boulevard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB C1 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapham Junction railway station MMB 15 377155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westerleigh Junction MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. I tried smoothing the blue parts of the sky but it did not make much of a difference, and with clouds it can be risky. -- Aisano 19:52, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 01 43045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:07, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «28 The Exchange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 23:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oakleigh Park railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuneaton railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wensley railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Is it possible less dark ? --Christian Ferrer 11:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Yes. Mattbuck 16:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)  Support Better --Christian Ferrer 05:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 47 170106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Kor!An 10:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB S8 Cripps Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PJDespa 21:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 30 507017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:46, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 36 350108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 07:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 75 156470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice train ! --PJDespa 18:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «37 Orchard Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 07 Humber Road South.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «B0 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stapleton Road railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB F7 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB K6 Tower Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok, the perspective don't disturb me --Christian Ferrer 16:36, 11June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --NorbertNagel 17:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 88 365511 365530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO, but below minimum size requirement. Do you have a larger version? --NorbertNagel 16:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC) It's about 9MP. Mattbuck 18:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Good quality - strange, yesterday I got a size warning from the QIhelper tool. --NorbertNagel 16:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stapleton Road railway station MMB 20 150221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you bright a little the shadow, please --Christian Ferrer 11:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 18:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:42 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hednesford Hills Raceway MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Centring is just, but ok --Christian Ferrer 11:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starbeck railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting image and good quality. Tsui 08:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 25 390026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 13:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 26 43062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs in the upper left and right parts should be fixed --Haneburger 09:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 18:36, 12 June 2013 (UTC) mow QI--Haneburger 05:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 68 170518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please less dark --Christian Ferrer 11:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 17:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:44 14 June 2013 (UTC)

"Nudity"? O_o

Hi Matt,

Can you possibly explain why erroneous photos are appearing in your image feed, tagged as 'nudity'? For example, User:Mattbuck/Nudity/2013 June 11-20 contains this image of Eden Atwood that I recently uploaded. I can assure you she's fully-clothed in the photograph, and I find it more than a little disquieting to see a notable jazz singer surrounded by photographs of bored teenagers' penises (penes?) in various stages of arousal. Care to explain? Bot malfunction? - Alison ^❤ 04:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

• That didn't seem to do much to help :/ - Alison ^❤ 09:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

  The plural of penis is penises. As for why it showed up, I don't know. I will ask the bot's maintainer to come and tell us. The reason is because nudity is a parent category of one category you added to it, probably quite a few levels up. The bot is not able to actually recognise penises and only show those. If you have a way of doing that, please inform your local AI lab. As for your second point, I've seen many images with OTRS templates which never get filled for years - npd seemed prudent. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

  To your first point, the English Wikipedia claims 'penes' to also be legit. Also, I never suggested for an instant that the bot actively recognized the male 'virile member', that would be your inference. The AI department is in the next building from mine, two floors down. And as for the final point, I'll assume you're just being diligent here and not being mean. The reason I bring this up in the first place is that the image subject is a notable intersex activist and having this happen here can be construed as egregiously offensive, as you can imagine. Hence my genuine concern here. I notice it's not just her image that's affected. Let's see what the bot owner has to say ... - Alison ^❤ 09:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

  Category:Intersex activists -> Category:Intersexuality -> Category:Hermaphroditism -> Category:Genitalia by gender -> Category:Genitalia -> Category:Erogenous zones -> Category:Eroticism -> Category:Nudity or partial nudity. We should probably put a filter on one of the first three categories. I'll leave the decision up to you as to which. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 10:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

  Thanks for that. To be honest, everything from Category:Hermaphroditism up should go. None of these are nudity-related and, indeed, hermaphoditism shouldn't be included anyway as it relates to non-human animals these days. Thanks again - Alison ^❤ 07:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P1080449 - Elena LENINA crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Yes, I do! --Christian Ferrer 20:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Wow! --Ralf Roletschek 23:08, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starcross railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camden Road railway station MMB 10 378230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «66 Si Yuan Centre, Amenities Building and Aspire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful. Trace 09:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB I7 Birkbeck College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice --Christian Ferrer 18:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Haneburger 10:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «D8 River Trym.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «P8 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 08:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality_images_candidates

You wrote "arely above 2MP and rather dark. Could you brighten it please?" under my picture on page

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates

I uploaded a new version of the file...

So I see. It still seems rather dark to me. Oh, and in future, add your reply at the QI page - that way it's easy for everyone to see you've taken on board the comments. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I see you did. You need to be careful - anything after the 2nd | in a nomination isnt shown. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

You wrote "Could you brighten some more please?" under my picture on page

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates

I tried to brighten some more, and uploaded a new version of the file...

Looking now. Please remember to sign your posts! -mattbuck (Talk) 15:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great contributions! Thank you! Brucebruce (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 50 158777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB W9 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «79 Netham Weir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 26 221132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosmont railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Croydon station MMB 12 378136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 16:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool Street station MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 07:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 57 390054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bolton Abbey MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clifton Down railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 11:48, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 11:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quality is just at right but OK --Christian Ferrer 04:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB C4 221123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 04:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your Signpost Op-ed article at en:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-06-19/Op-ed

Hi Matt

In your article, I wonder whether the phrase "Many of the images Jimbo deleted were in fact subsequently deleted again" should in fact read "Many of the images Jimbo deleted were in fact subsequently undeleted again". --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Actually I did mean deleted, as in Jimbo deleted them, they were restored to allow discussion, and subsequently found to be useless. But I need to work on it generally. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Ah, OK then. I didn't quite understand what you meant there. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh, they published it. I was going to make changes. oops. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:52, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for writing a response to the Signpost piece, explaining a little of our passion for this global project and the treasures to be found here. Hope we have a chance soon to meet up and talk it over at one of our local events. Cheers Fæ (talk) 00:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

DR closure

Ya, I'm just waiting to see if will be a office action and direct removal of tools or someone acting as a volunteer and requesting via Wiki, but I'm sure expecting at least the try. Béria Lima ^msg 00:20, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «81 Trent Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Proportion of sky is hazardous but OK --Christian Ferrer 18:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 58 Christmas tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice but bad crop (or centring) --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Cropped. Mattbuck 21:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)  Support Would be better with the entire star and the base but OK --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 19 June 2013 (UTC

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 07:54, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham Autokarna MMB 06 Vauxhall Chevette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 08:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 34 153380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:30, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tytherington MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 10:48, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Y6 Rutland Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the shadow are a bit too much dark --Christian Ferrer 04:14, 18 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 04:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB C0 373213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Neutral Quality seem good but I don't understand what I see, there too many things --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC) That end of the station is a bit busy. OK, there's the edge of the balcony, behind which is a wine bar, behind which is a glass wall behind which is a train behind which is a statue above which are olympic rings. Mattbuck 21:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)  Comment It's OK if you put this description in the file page --Christian Ferrer 05:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:38, 19 June 2013 (UTC)  Support OK now --Christian Ferrer 05:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB U5 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staithes MMB 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 15:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staithes MMB 17 Old Jack's Boat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 15:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staithes MMB 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 11:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB D4 Midland Main Line 156404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB S0 Chemistry and Engineering and Science Learning Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please bright a little the shadows --Christian Ferrer 10:48, 19 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 09:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)  Support Much better --Christian Ferrer 16:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#June 11, 2013

Hello. You wrote a review for this picture File:Rhododendron cv. 021.JPG. I uploaded new version. Please take a look. --Kor!An (talk) 07:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 10:27, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 44 158857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK--Christian Ferrer 20:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finsbury Park station MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK--Christian Ferrer 20:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB N2 Covent Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO (my monitor is a bit dark and I'm not sure with pictures with dark areas. Sorry, all your images have dark areas and, therefore, I do not comment)--Lmbuga 17:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Gloria Brame jpegs

I uploaded pictures of myself and my books -- over which I hold copyright. How would I provide you with proof that I have that copyright?

best, Gloria Brame

Hi Gloria. The reason I tagged them as lacking permission is that people come along all the time and claim to be public figures, and most of the time they're lying. We work to protect the legitimate copyright holders, so we ask for additional verification. This can be done by an email to the OTRS team, from one of your public email accounts, stating that you are indeed the copyright holder of the images and that you give permission for release under the relevant licences. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB F6 Wensor Avenue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Gm-gallery-9439.jpg

Where did you mentioned the posterisation? Thank you for the advice.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

OK, possibly not posterisation as opposed to... fuzz. It's quite blurry, there's not much colour depth. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

It is a night shot, there may be no color at all for some places. Where did you see the problem?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Like I said, generally fuzzy, but around the light I noticed particularly. I'm sorry, but I don't think it's QI. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:31, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

The trouble is, I cannot improve the image based on your reply, and I cannot catch the workaround. In case I suppose it into QI again, people will ask about the reasons .--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymington MMB 07 Harbour 421497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 01 158785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 49 43XXX 43XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All the image is a bit blurred and perhaps not QI for me, but there is a strange blurred area, see note, please--Lmbuga 17:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC) I can sharpen more if you want. That "strange blurred bit" is the heat haze from the exhaust. Mattbuck 17:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Sorry and thanks, I had no idea. QI for me--Lmbuga 11:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 92 57308 56312 57309 37419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK but your centring is just (legs of the young boy) --Christian Ferrer 04:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support not sharp and blurry --Christian Ferrer 04:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC) Sharpened. Mattbuck 19:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC) After reflection, I prefear and promote the first version, maybe I have decline too faster, the conditions of your shoot were not the best --Christian Ferrer 19:33, 27 June 2013 (UTC) Can I keep the 2nd version? I think it's a bit better. Mattbuck 19:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC) Yes, you can and thanks for informations for my talk page --Christian Ferrer 19:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Is there a little ca on the Help Point pylon at left? --Christian Ferrer 20:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Very mild, but yes. Fixed. Mattbuck 19:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok now --Christian Ferrer 19:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Question for QI candidates

Hi, I've one question. About how many time it's the usage to decline an image candidate when I've rewiewed it? --Christian Ferrer 21:16, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

You mean how long after asking for improvements you should decline? I tend to say 5 days. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it was my question, thanks --Christian Ferrer 21:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «F9 St Augustine's Reach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes railway station MMB 02 185104 144006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuneaton railway station MMB 10 170637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, but it seems a bit dark (underexposed) IMO--Lmbuga 12:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 04 153319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 11:51, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kentish Town West railway station MMB 02 378213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 70 Princess.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 51 158780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:57, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 88 M5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:57, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 29 153362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth MMB 01 Cross Country Route.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO and very nice and original reflection. Very good composition IMO--Lmbuga 20:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirksworth railway station MMB 06 79900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 23:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milton Keynes Central railway station MMB 20 221101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes railway station MMB 19 144006 185123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It need to be a little bit sharpenend and the left is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 04:10, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 19:57, 30 June 2013 (UTC)  Support Very much better Christian Ferrer 20:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Warning: Violation of Guidelines

[1] " (that includes calling anybody a 'troll'; please do not use that word - no, not even once!)."

This edit is completely unacceptable conduct and admin are expected to act better than that. If you refuse to strike it or refuse to mitigate your violation, then you are acting abusively and this qualifies as an action that can be used to rationalize a de-admin request. Either fix it or be put up for de-admin per our policies. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:35, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

You are trolling the discussion and no amount of threatening those who call you on it will change that. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

It is obvious that you don't know what the term means, or you are being purposefully disruptive. You have a long history of making such blatantly inappropriate accusations like the above, and it would be best for the project if you stopped or were prevented from acting that way. You know you are acting inappropriately, and that is the worst part of it. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Derivative uploaded

Hi - just dropping you a courtesy note to say I've uploaded a derivative of one of your images at File:London Underground banner.jpg. I don't know if you prefer to have derivative images in your user category or not (I haven't added it).  An optimist on the run! 17:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Disruptive editing by Ottava Rima. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Fæ (talk) 17:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB A5 350263 350266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney MMB 02 Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worksop railway station MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imho. --V-wolf 20:13, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 36 43017 43136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 21:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good detail, interesting composition. Geographic detail is also included. Bennett000 03:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham Autokarna MMB 17 Bus lineup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting buses, but slightly underexposed imo.--ArildV 14:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC) I can brighten it, but it was a really miserable day. Mattbuck 15:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Ok.--ArildV 16:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:17, 03 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichfield Trent Valley railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:42, 03 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goathland railway station MMB 04 D5061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Pretty --Christian Ferrer 21:22, 01 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 30 153380 143618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Right is leaning out and little CA at right: window and wall --Christian Ferrer 21:29, 01 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:59, 2 July 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:42, 03 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockport railway station MMB 18 150140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment right side cut and a bit sharpening would look better imho --Rjcastillo 23:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok for me --Christian Ferrer 17:20, 03 July 2013 (UTC)

Notes

Please, see notes of File:Weston-super-Mare MMB 56.jpg and delete then. I have no experience with that kind of photos. I have not ventured to make comment. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 06:35, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

I already withdrew, can't fix it for several days. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Ok, and sorry, I have been late--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 06:38, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

File:IsraeliBus.gif

Hello!

I have noticed your edits on File:IsraeliBus.gif. Why was the low res version restored? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:23, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

The thumbnail doesn't seem to work for high res. I imagine that was why. I tried again but still no joy. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for handling this. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 18:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

The thumbnail still isn't working for me. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:13, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Not on my device. Everything is shown perfectly on my system. --High Contrast (talk) 20:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Good quality--Llorenzi 19:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 07:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matlock railway station MMB 01 153313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay. --Florstein 07:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kentish Town West railway station MMB 01 378213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 06:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minehead railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 06 375808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:46, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB B6 153321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments how many stations are there in GB without QI? --Ralf Roletschek 15:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC) As of the start of May 2013, I had taken photos of 256 mainline railway stations in Britain. That's just over 10%. Mattbuck 18:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston railway station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 06:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bournville railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting perspective, QI for me. --Steindy 20:51, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB P3 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:51, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby MMB 31 Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:02, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 80 57309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:02 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:02 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross St Pancras tube station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:56 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 19 Rievaulx Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The left corner at top is disturbing, can you improve it? --Christian Ferrer 20:17, 03 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:12, 5 July 2013 (UTC)  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very darks shadows on the right side. --ArildV 08:24, 27 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:04, 30 June 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok for me --Christian Ferrer 04:32, 04 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Covent Garden tube station MMB 03 1973-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 11:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Mattbuck. You have new messages at Lmbuga's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry, Spanish. You must wait for Poco a Poco for translation--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 15:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:251, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:251, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Awarding you a barnstar for sticking around at Commons after "all these years" - you're doing a great job, keep it up! Finn Rindahl (talk) 14:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

You're still here?! -mattbuck (Talk) 17:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

yes, but don't tell anyone please :) After I unwatched all the noticeboards and the talk pages of the "usual suspects", uploading a few images and doing some minor category-maintenance is bearable (just). Can't help noticing that the same people who made the headlines at COM:AN/U three years ago are still around though. Finn Rindahl (talk) 18:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Mantis eating a Common Bushbrown (Mycalesis perseus) butterfly.jpg

Your closure did nothing to address the reason for the nomination, which was that the photo was already published on Flickr with a non-free licence. I have also nominated the photo for deletion on en:wiki for the same reason. It has nothing to do with the creators anti-commons complaints, but pure and simple licencing issues.Nigel Ish (talk) 08:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

It's the same guy. There is no issue. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:19, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Mattbuck, it is not me initiated that DR request; not I made any troll there. So it will be nice if you edit your closing note accordingly. JKadavoor Jee 11:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. JKadavoor Jee 18:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney Junction railway station MMB 11 E6001 3717 "City of Truro".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 07:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Battersea Park railway station MMB 16 456011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 07:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 30 220018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 22:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB P7 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 21:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB K9 Trent Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It seems there's nothing in focus... I like it though. Nice colors and an interesting atmosphere. --Martin Falbisoner 21:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 20 185107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice compostion--Flickrworker 08:39, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finsbury Park station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice with persons looking at you Christian Ferrer 19:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northallerton railway station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support Christian Ferrer 19:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «29 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:34, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Levisham railway station MMB 06 45407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «60 National College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left is a bit too much bright, it's disturbing, can you improve that? --Christian Ferrer 19:54, 03 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC) Very sorry but not enough IMO, can you darken the left a little more? --Christian Ferrer 05:25, 6 July 2013 (UTC) Tried again. Mattbuck 20:42, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Support It's ok --Christian Ferrer 05:15, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Appeal against blocking of Penyulap

Hello. I'm shocked to see Penyulap being blocked. There might be some problem with his postings for a few persons, but I've had greater problems with admins, and yet I ignored all these and simply moved ahead. To quote one example plz have a glance at this conversation:

A very sad thing on Commons is that many admins (NOT ALL) do not observe minimum conversational courtesies - An admin on AN/U accused me of having an axe to grind because I simply asked him to remove link of the website where he's selling pictures. An elderly admin threatened me with a block simply because he could not agree with me that aboriginal peoples of Australia are different from their Canadian counterparts. Recently, I made a mistake of wrongly classifying a file and a wonderful admin posted a sarcastic comment on my talk page: "Hi Hindustanilanguage. Do you have such dogs in India? ;-) --Leyo 16:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)" - While I've acknowledged the messy situation here, compare this with my humble message to an admin who deleted one of my uploads by a similar mistake. I must admit the speedy restoration of the file by the admin and his duty-consciousness when I alerted him. Can most of our admins not have similar good faith in other users? Can they not start polite conversations, discuss things and work in coordination and not conflict? Now there is a proposal to intrude into userpages and galleries - Are these people attempting to convert Commons into a dictatorial entity? Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:38, 15 April 2013 (UTC).

I feel the gentle cultures of the world are in conflict with the more confrontational cultures. On commons, that limits the opportunities for many people, they feel uncomfortable here because of the conflict. Commons can't appeal to the masses of gentle English as a second language countries. There are many hollywood movies based on the plot of what happens when you take a person from a gentle culture and place them onto the streets of a US city. I believe it is not a good thing to acclimatise to a sick culture, or to become nasty to survive in a nasty place. The social skills which enable harmonious living in high population densities across many parts of the world, are skills that we would do well to help pass onto our friends and colleagues. While it will help the commons project penetrate the English speaking Internet, it will also help teach useful skills and calm the Rl conflicts many people have to deal with. I feel the single most important idea here in this RfC is 'if the actions of a few people are causing no harm, there is no need to challenge them at all, just leave them and let's all live in peace' Penyulap ☏ 10:04, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Please revoke the block in the interest of the wider good - no offense to anyone. Regards, Hindustanilanguage (talk) 15:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC).

No. His comments were just trolling, he can take a few days out. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawlish MMB 15 South Devon Main Line 43003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 13 465043 465008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes MMB 03 Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Degagebouche

Mhhh, the picture you wants to delete are made by me, if you don't trust me you can look at the Meta Data --Degagebouche (talk) 09:18, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosmont railway station MMB 18 92214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tight crop, but good quality. --Smial 10:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peterborough railway station MMB 08 43308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good one. Thanks for contributing it --High Contrast 11:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 20 221119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 08:46, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «44 Orchard Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 11:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peterborough railway station MMB 20 91104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 11:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 08:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2009 MMB 00 «07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:54, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichfield Trent Valley railway station MMB 13 323242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:54, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «06 National College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichfield Trent Valley railway station MMB 09 323242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualiy. Interesting urban landscape. Good photo. --ArildV 12:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «47 Orchard Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:32, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 31 43186 150217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The photo has some Image errors. --Steindy 22:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC) All the "image errors" you found were legitimate - damage to trains, paint, SEAGULLS! Mattbuck 17:55, 12 July 2013 (UTC) OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 79 332003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎

You are invited to join Commons:WikiProject BSicon‎. Useddenim (talk) 17:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

reply

You might regard this as a minor point, but I believe you have mischaracterized my position. I did not say that 15 year olds should be barred from being trusted on WMF projects. I am happy to trust individuals who are not yet technically adults -- provided they consistently act responsibly, civilly and competently. As I have written elsewhere, we have had contributors who were demonstrably adults, who also, demonstrably were not able to act responsibly, civilly or competently, and I think we should stop trusting them too.

I am not the only contributor in that discussion to point out to Arctic Kangaroo the double-edged nature of the argument "don't hold me responsible for the actions I have taken here -- as I am only a kid, and I don't really know what I am doing".

IMO, AK should be strongly discouraged from declining or approving AFCs, not due to his claim to be a minor, but due largely to his decision to announce he could not be held responsible for his actions because he was a minor who didn't understand what he was doing. His threats to disrupt various WMF projects are another reason, as was his general incivility.

If the cohort of individuals who close AFCs include any other individuals who are technically minors I would ask them to bear Arctic Kangaroo's example in mind, and be doubly sure they always acted responsibly, civilly and competently. Geo Swan (talk) 19:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Panorama_Hafen_Cuxhaven_Alte_Liebe_2013.jpg FP nomination?

Thanks for your positive comment about the panoramic view of the harbour of Cuxhaven and your FPC suggestion. Unfortunately I have currently two FPCs running. I would be pleased if you nominate this image. Thanks. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milton Keynes Central railway station MMB 14 390XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 11:27, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 18:27, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 11 444020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «B8 Clifton Suspension Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Unusual perspective, but ok. --Smial 22:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finsbury Park station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 21:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coventry railway station MMB 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, expresive and natural. I like the composition--Lmbuga 11:54, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB H2 Mini 7s and Miglia Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good IMO--Lmbuga 11:53, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Degagebouche

Hi Matt. I've blocked this user for a month. He's given me the same innocent act in regard to copyright before: User_talk:INeverCry/Archive_4#File:Nicki_Minaj_At_Las_Vegas.png. He knows these Nikki Manaj images are copyvios. Just thought I'd let you know, especially if we see an unblock request. INeverCry (talk) 04:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newport railway station MMB 31 43187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 06:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 89 317342 365501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 06:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thirsk railway station MMB 16 185103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 06:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deganwy railway station MMB 08 175113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support And IMO you're right Christian Ferrer 11:29, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stanway House MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 19:27, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hillingdon tube station MMB 04 S-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support It's ok but there is aliasing on the red doors ot the train (like your other image on the same subject in CR) --Christian Ferrer 17:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB O8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK Christian Ferrer 17:18, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 13 DLR 25 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good--Lmbuga 09:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 05 221125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Strong reflection on the front of the train, but might be inevitable --Smial 14:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Some lens flare is imho not disturbing --Smial 14:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Ruislip station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support Christian Ferrer 12:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Newport railway station MMB 07.jpg

Hi, Mattbuck, I've changed my position for this picture, and I want to precice (I think you know it) my comment was very harch but not ill-intentioned. Friendly --Christian Ferrer 19:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Don't worry, I generally manage not to take comments about bad photos to heart. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion comments

Hi Mattbuck. I'd like to discuss some aspects of deletion policy/procedure. First though, let me get off my chest some concerns I have with the closing remarks below.

On Commons:Deletion requests/File:Doleschallia bisaltide bisaltide (Autumn Leaf) - male, January 2013, Singapore.jpg you closed with the comments: "As has been noted, free licences are irrevocable. Frankly, the DR could be closed with that one sentence, but I'll continue. I note that Arctic Kangaroo states that he thinks Commons "shows no respect" for authors. I disagree, our whole system is set up to respect authors - we respect their copyrights, we respect their attribution, we thank them for their generosity and we respect their decisions. Unfortunately some decisions cannot be unmade, and in circumstances like this we make a judgment call. Our general policy on this matter is that if the image is in use on other projects then courtesy deletions are declined. The wikisoftware cannot even list all the places this file is in use there are so many! I also note that, frankly, my decision is coloured by the respect Arctic Kangaroo gives us - namely next to nothing. Threatening to vandalise projects to get your way is pathetic and petty. That said, Geo Swan, your point that 16 year olds should not be allowed to contribute to AfC on Wikipedia is also out of line - we have many good contributors who are under 18, and your comments do them an injustice."

While Commons deletion policy requires you to "provide adequate explanation for [your] decision", I think in the above comments you strayed from explaining to lecturing. This is most apparent by opening "frankly" comment. You were confident this was in fact a simple case made over-complex by the community discussion. This may turn out to be misplaced confidence, as Jimbo has requested Wikimedia Legal to ascertain whether the CC licence granted by a minor is valid -- an issue raised in the discussion. You also admonish Arctic Kangaroo and Geo Swan in your closing comments. I think this is misplaced and unfair [to be clear, I'm not passing judgement on whether your admonishment is correct/fair, but where you chose to do it]. Closing comments by their nature cannot be responded to, nor is a deletion discussion the correct forum to raise issues of user behaviour -- their talk page is the place to begin that.

Those issues aside, I want to better understand Commons deletion. I appreciate that Commons deletion policy and procedures is different to Wikipedia and there are good and bad reasons for this. On Wikipedia, it is the admin's job to determine the consensus of the deletion discussion, constrained by any overriding policy issues. It is not the WP admin's job to form or express their own personal view. On Commons, the deletion policy doesn't even mention the word "consensus". The deletion request page (which isn't policy as far as I can see, just a document of process) does mention consensus but only that it "will be taken into account". This I believe gives too much power to the closing admin, and not enough to the community. On Wikipedia, the views of admins are not held any higher than that of other users [they can only do things other users can't], whereas here on Commons, the admins appear to be elevated. Is that a healthy situation?

In the above discussion, regardless of whether the licence turns out to be valid or not, I wonder: if the consensus at the discussion had been to delete, would you have carried that through? Such a (hypothetical) consensus wouldn't AFAIK "override Commons policy" but neither would it be explicitly required by Commons policy.

I note the deletion request page refers to the Admin determining if "the file can validly be kept" rather than whether the file should be kept. Hence the refrain "no valid reason to delete". In some of the discussions Commons has had recently, there seems to be a need for the community to choose to delete a file even if technically they are permitted to keep it. Do you agree with that need or do you feel we should only delete material when we absolutely have to? How could one express this ability to choose in policy?

I note you mention courtesy deletion and that this is declined if the file is in use. I am unable to find any policy or other written statement about this. Can you direct me to it? If it is missing, then I suggest the whole issue of courtesy deletion (whether requested by the photographer or the subject) be discussed at Michael Magg's "big discussion" in order to formulate some clear policy.

Sorry this is a bit long. Regards, Colin (talk) 21:16, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

You're right, that is quite long.

I possibly view DRs somewhat differently than others do - I see the closing comments as the closure of the discussion, a rounding up of all points into a final decision, and that can include comments on users' behaviour, just as when closing a section at the admin noticeboard. Consensus can be taken into account at DRs, but we are not bound by it, especially when legal matters arise. That said, unless there is a legal reason for deletion, we are unlikely to go against a keep consensus. I would say that there was really very little in the way of consensus in that discussion, and that those who favoured keeping made some valid points. As regards courtesy deletion, I can't point to a policy offhand, it's likely more just the way we work, and what I've picked up over years on this project. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I appreciate the community consensus can't keep an image that policy/law says we must delete. But I'm more interested in the other way round: does the community have the ability to choose to delete an image -- and would you comply with that? I would very much appreciate if you can find anything written about courtesy deletion. You see, sometimes people are very dogmatic about obeying the strict letter of policy and not budging, but this seems to be an area where there is no official policy. I think it would be helpful to record this and your experience there would be helpful. Are you aware of other deletion conventions that might not be recorded in our (rather poor, if I'm honest) policy. Colin (talk) 09:54, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

We do have the ability to choose to delete media, despite their being within scope and freely licensed, for various reasons, including user request, bad quality, etc. I fairly regularly nominate images on such grounds. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:00, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wirksworth railway station MMB 03 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:25, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB A7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Question

Hello! I'm an admin on Arabic Wikipedia, and i do participate here sometimes: translate files to Arabic and add old photos as well some new ones after i gain permission from their copy right holders. Anyway, i often find paintings and drawings of maps and events that concern the Arab world in particular and Muslim world in general, that are not found here and i'm reluctant to upload any fearing that the lack of info might cause their deletion. But now we are in need for some particular ones, so do you think these maps and painting of a siege here, as well as this painting and the Arabic maps here and the black and white drawing of the ship fleet (scroll down) are suitable for uploading? and if they are (or just some of them) which license would be the best?

can you please answer back in my talk page? Thank you--باسم (talk) 01:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 36 390036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 12:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 50 Sheffield Hallam University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI to me --A.Savin 11:34, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 82 222XXX 170103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newport railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Backwell MMB 02 Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB A8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Pictures deleted

Hi Mattbuck, I recognised that - on your initiative - a number of photos have been deleted from Wiki which I had uploaded for inclusion in Wikipedia pages. Originals of these photos (Photos, scans) are either taken by myself, or are given to me by the person in question (or in case of deceased person by the daughter). I believe that I followed correctly the rules of Wikimedia commons for the upload. Could you please give your reasons for your action and what I shall do differently? The pictures are:

• File:SolarSail-DLR-ESA.jpg
• File:HHKoelle.jpg
• File:HorstAntes-Documenta1968.jpg
• File:Mathias Schroeder-3.jpg
• File:Mathias Schroeder-sw.jpg
• File:Mathias Schroeder.jpg
• File:EmilvonSkramlik1967.jpg
• File:Burghuegel-Amrum.jpg
• File:Portrait-annamariasuppa2.jpg
• File:VonBraunErdmann1958.jpg
• File:VonBraunErdmann.jpg
• File:Keukenhofbos.jpg
• File:Spaceexpo noordwijk.jpg
• File:Wigbert Fehse.jpg

Regards dkassing

As you can see at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dkassing, several images were deleted because they were claimed as own work despite clearly not being so, and the rest were because, given the issues with the other photos, we couldn't be sure you were in fact the copyright holder, and so applied the precautionary principle (if in doubt, delete). If you did not take the images yourself, we need explicit permission from the copyright holder that they release the images under a free licence. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

If you are indeed the copyright holder of these items, you should send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the files for you. -FASTILY 20:51, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Bwm-1955.jpg

This is a baby picture of me. It's my photo and I scanned it. I've added information to it as much as I can. Bwmoll3 (talk) 11:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I think we can assume this counts as a work for hire. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pwllheli MMB 03 Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:31, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 54 144006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality  Support --Christian Ferrer 14:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 21 180102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 18:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 55 Ruislip.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB E3 395028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 10:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chepstow MMB 09 Gloucester to Newport Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. IDn of the purpley flowers would be nice. --Jastrow 14:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB C5 Castle Combe Saloon Car Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for meChristian Ferrer 18:14, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 23 170103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It can be QI for me, but see notes, please--Lmbuga 18:18, 27 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 09:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC) QI for me--Lmbuga 21:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:32, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 39 59203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Christian Ferrer 06:32, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «A5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice color and QI  Support --Christian Ferrer 13:07, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston Square tube station MMB 06 S-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me  Support --Christian Ferrer 13:07, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me  Support --Christian Ferrer 13:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)