User talk:Joanbanjo

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Joanbanjo!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

--SieBot (talk) 23:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. Mardetanha ^talk 22:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Valldigna2006 (9).jpg

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Joanbanjo!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. Multichill (talk) 11:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Joanbanjo!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2 Grabadocalcografico.Perspectiva.jpg is uncategorized since 13 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Valldisna 081.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Valènciax 507.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Valldisna 076.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Santa Faç Alacant columnes.JPG was uncategorized on 8 November 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Museu de Belles Arts Gravina (MUBAG), Alacant.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MUBAG Museu de Belles Arts, Alacant, País Valencià.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Museu de Belles Arts Gravina, Alacant (MUBAG).jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Museu de Belles Arts Gravina d'Alacant, portada.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Accés al Museu de Belles Arts Gravina d'Alacant.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Llotja

Imagino que vols dir la pàgina Category:Llotja de la Seda. Això és una categoria on s'inclouen automàticament totes les imatges classificades en aquesta categoria. Una altra cosa diferent és una galeria, com Llotja de Palma, on es pot fer una selecció d'imatges, es poden comentar amb un peu d'imatge i es poden classificar en seccions. --V.Riullop (talk) 12:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

En aquest cas no existeix la pàgina, s'ha de crear: Llotja de la Seda o Llotja de València. --V.Riullop (talk) 20:33, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museu de Belles Arts de València, neoclàssic.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:00, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Please don't blank pages

Hi Joanbanjo,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Teulada on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. 15:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)–Krinkle^talk

Oriola

Hola! Abans de tot disculpa'm per la tardança. Bé, el nom del depòsit d'aigua es Pous del Cremòs, en plural; la porta de l'antiga muralla, al costat de Santo Domingo és anomenada de les tres formes (de l'Olma, de Crevillent i d'Elx), però crec que la més correcta és de l'Olma i l'edifici blau modernista normalment és anomenada Galerias Colón. Una abraçada! Xinese-v (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beniarbeig, pont trencat, octubre 2007.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:54, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Museu_Valencia_de_la_Il·lustració_i_la_Modernitat,_interior.JPG

File:Museu_Valencia_de_la_Il·lustració_i_la_Modernitat,_interior.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 14:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museu_Valencia_de_la_Il·lustració_i_la_Modernitat,_interior.JPG

File:Museu_Valencia_de_la_Il·lustració_i_la_Modernitat,_interior.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 18:38, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Teatre Chapí

Hola, Joanbanjo. Podries dir-me on es troba la maqueta del projecte del museu Chapí que vas penjar? No l'havia vista mai i la veritat és que m'interessaria molt saber on s'exposa. Gràcies de bestreta. Qoan (dis-me!) 13:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moltes gràcies per la resposta. Potser no és tan fàcil com esperava, però ja m'has ajudat per començar a resoldre el misteri. T'avisaré si descobrisc alguna cosa. Salut, i que vaja molt bé. Qoan (dis-me!) 23:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sant Marcel·lí

Veig que has ficat Sant Marcel·lí al mapa. M'agrada, moltes gràcies! B25es (talk) 15:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Joanbanjo,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:29, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos de València

¡Moltes gràcies per les fotos de València! Estic ficant al dia la distribució per barris i en dues setmanes n'has ficat un fum més. B25es (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos de València per identificar

Hem tingut darrerament un allau de fotos de monuments, força bones però no gaire ben identificades, com les dues de la llotja de la seda que avui has recategoritzat. Entre les que no hem pogut categoritzar, i que dubto que siguin monuments protegits, hi ha:

Dues fotos que se suposa que són del carrer dels Cavallers, tot i que això també ho dubto:

Tres fotos d'un edifici (aquest edifici) del costat del museu de la Ciutat, però que no són del palau del Marqués de Campos. Crec que no és un monument protegit, però no sé si té un nom:

Te les pots mirar?--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gràcies.

La casa del Punt de Ganxo diria que no és un monument protegit perquè no surt a la ca:Llista de monuments de València.

Crear les categories, tan la de la casa com la del carrer, em sembla bé. Ho pots fer tu?--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ferramentes per categoritzar

Veig que estàs fent molta feina categoritzant imatges. Hi ha dues eines que crec que et poden anar molt bé pel que estàs fent: el HotCat i el Cat-a-lot. Te'ls pots activar a l'apartat "Ginys" de les preferències. Bàsicament, t'eviten haver d'anar afegint categories a mà.--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:18, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Concurs

Veig que estàs pujant fotografies de monuments, però que no tenen la plantilla {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2012|es-cat}} per entrar al concurs. Aniria molt bé que l'hi afegissis.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Joanbanjo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This concerns images of yours in Category:Cathedral of Candlemas of the Lord . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover

Hi Joanbanjo. You've got plenty of experience, and I've seen numerous valid rename requests from you, so I went ahead and gave you the filemover right. INeverCry 02:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Laparotomia de Vicent Castell Doménec, Museu de Belles Arts de Castelló.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Marina, Eliseu Meifrèn i Roig, Museu de Belles Arts de València.JPG

Yours sincerely, Lymantria (talk) 15:19, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museu de l'Acròpoli d'Atenes des de l'Acròpoli.JPG

File:Museu de l'Acròpoli d'Atenes des de l'Acròpoli.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Veggies (talk) 12:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 00:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Benicalaf

¡¡¡Felicitaciones!! He visto las fotos nuevas de Sant Jaume de Benicalaf. Cuando fuimos mi mujer y yo casi ni pudimos parar el coche y tú has conseguido sacar el interior. Gran trabajo. B25es (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias

por establecer el orden en el caos, otra vez. B25es (talk) 06:44, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Caterina

Hola, vaig deixar-li aquest missatge a un altre usuari en compte de a tu, pensant que va ser ell qui va redirigir la categoria sobre la torre de Santa Caterina:

Hola, he tornat a canviar el nom de la categoria sobre la torre de Santa Caterina, que havies redirigit des-de Tower of Santa Catalina a Tower of Santa Caterina (Valencia). La política corresponent diu que hem d'utilitzar els noms preferentment en anglés (no una mescla), i açó vaig fer des de la primera vegada tras una búsqueda a Google, on vaig veure que Tower of Santa Catalina es com s'anomena majoritariament en anglés.

Espere que no ho prengues a mal, perquè l'altra persona ja m'ha acusat de dinamitar el projecte al fer el canvi de nom. Com l'he dit, el títol estava mal perquè en anglès no s'escriu València sino Valencia, i vaig aprofitar per a canviar de nou Santa Caterina per Santa Catalina, tras buscar a Google, que es l'única font de la que disposo per comprovar-ho. Si trobes que m'he equivocat i que anomenen l'església com Churh of Santa Caterina de Valencia, Church of St. Catherine o alguna cosa pareguda, doncs fem el canvi una altra vegada sense problemes. Anomenar les paraules en anglés no cal si la categoria està completament en valencià, però tin-ho en compte per a categories com Church towers in Valencia en lloc de Church towers in València. Lobo (howl?) 21:29, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reunió el 25 de maig al Lluís Vives

Ja veig que has trobat la foto de Bolbait. Me l'han regalada.

El dia 25 (dissabte) de maig tenim convocada una reunió a l'IES Lluís Vives (el de València, segur que el saps trobar). Tenim la intenció de ser-hi de 10:00 a 14:00 per parlar de les activitats de Wikimedia, i també de Commons, per supossat. Si vols vindre, estàs invitat.

B25es (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

23 de juny

Demà anirem a prendre fotos de Marxalenes i les Tendetes, i si es pot també del Calvari. A les 9-9h15 estarem per l'Escola d'Idiomes. Com sempre, estàs invitat. Si tot va be farem moltes fotos i supose que et donarem un fum de feina amb la categorització. Intentarem que aquesta volta no estiga massa malament. B25es (talk) 15:10, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mont-Olivet i falles

Sospite que a :ca gasten la forma "montolivet" (així com Bega Baixa [sic] per a parlar d'altre barri) perquè són, o serien al seu moment, els "noms oficials" d'eixos districtes/barris. Tanmateix segons este link el nom és Mont-Olivet, o siga que jo em plantejaria el demanar el canvi de nom de l'article a :ca. Pel que fa als ninots en exposició permanent, al no ser a l'aire lliure cauen fora del FOP. Tanmateix, en ser exposició permanent crec que hi han excepcions. Mira Estes dos discussions. Crec que podrien apujar-se per alguna excepció, però hauria de llegir una altra volta la llei. Quan tinga temps ho faré.--Coentor (talk) 18:36, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Conteste un mes després, que he recordat la discussió ara que he apujat més fotos falleres. Cite d'una anterior discussió: "FoP: Permanent vs temporary: The exhibited objects must be exhibited in a permanent way. If a work is presented on a public place temporarily, one may be obliged to get the explicit permission to take its picture. Whether a work is installed at a public place permanently or not is not a question of absolute time, but a question of what the intention was when the work was placed there. If it was put there with the intention of leaving it in the public place indefinitely or at least for the whole natural lifetime of the work, then it is "permanent"".--Coentor (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Este redactat ens permet, almenys, apujar fotos de qualsevol ninot a l'aire lliure. Sobre espais tancats, se que a Gran Bretanya les exposicions permanents als museus entren, ací són excepció.--Coentor (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Categorías

No te preocupes mucho por el nombre de la categoría. [[Category:Santuario de la Virgen de la Vega (Alcalá de la Selva)]] puede estar bien. Escarlati (talk) 15:49, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Línies i Lledó

Ahir anarem a prendre unes fotos de la Línia XYZ (fortificacions republicanes de la Guerra Civil) i passarem per Mascarell. Vaig fer-li una foto a una Verge de Lledó i a un casalici amb pense que Sant Miquel. Pot-ser t'interessin. Se repasses les altres -hi ha de La Vall d'Uixó, La Vilavella i Nules- ets benvingut també, perquè de coneixements sobre eixa línia no en vaig sobrat. B25es (talk) 18:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Codi WLM

Ep, bona feina amb els monuments. Però seria perfecte si també hi poses el codi a les fotos. Totes les del concurs es carreguen en una base de dades amb diferents utilitats i estadístiques a partir del seu codi. Només amb {{BIC|<codi>}} n'hi ha prou i ja diferencia en la majoria de casos si és BIC o BRL. Exemple. Alternativament pots utilitzar el botó blau (+) de les llistes. Precarrega les dades necessàries tretes de la pròpia llista i pots carregar diferents fotos del mateix monument d'una tongada. --V.Riullop (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Intruments musicals a l'estudi de la casa Benlliure, València.JPG

File:Intruments musicals a l'estudi de la casa Benlliure, València.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muralla d'Alacant

Com a monumentalista valencià, a veure si saps identificar la foto File:Is not China, it is still Alicante.JPG. Podria ser la Muralla del passeig de Ramiro? Potser la del carrer Major o simplement el Castell de Santa Bàrbara, no n'estic segur. --V.Riullop (talk) 18:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salutacions

Bon dia. Estic a Vila-real amb Dorieo i més companys wikipedistes i ens hem recordat molt de tu. Ahir estiguérem de recorregut fotogràfic per ací i en poc temps tindràs més meterial per a catalogar. Ens agradaria trobar-te alguna volta personalment (l'enveja, que és molt mala). El dia 13 d'octubre hem previst una mena de safari pel barri de Faitanar, que crec que és dels pocs que encara no has tocat. B25es (talk) 09:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Basílica de València, no file

La càrrega de File:Basílica de la mare de Déu dels Desemparats, llanterna de la cúpula.JPG ha fallat i no hi ha fitxer. Si el tens localitzat hi ha l'opció de carregar-lo en la mateixa pàgina. --V.Riullop (talk) 06:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Categories

Doncs no sabria dir-te quina és la millor classificació i els noms corresponents. Només se m'acut seguir el que diuen els articles d'aquests llocs sobre les parts més destacades. La veritat és que hi ha subcategories on m'hi perdo perquè no queda clar de què es tracta. Després cal conèixer el lloc per poder identificar les fotos. No sé, si hi ha algun cas concret el podem comentar, però d'entrada està embolicat i no sé per on començar. --V.Riullop (talk) 12:29, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Joanbanjo,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Joanbanjo,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Cova dels Arcs

Com autor de les fotos de Category:Cova dels Arcs a veure si em pots aclarir si aquesta cova és la mateixa que la Cova del Moraig del Catàleg de Coves situada a 38.707587,0.166343. --V.Riullop (talk) 12:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gràcies. Ho preguntava perquè estic pensant en fer una llista de coves a partir del catàleg com a part de ca:Viquiprojecte:Patrimoni natural. És possible que aquest any en lloc de fer Wiki Loves Monuments fem el Wiki Loves Earth sobre patrimoni natural. Ja he localitzar fotos teves relacionades amb el tema i segurament et pot interessar aquest nou concurs i el projecte per organitzar la informació de patrimoni natural. No està encara decidit però aviat hi poden haver notícies.

Sobre el refugi antiaeri veig que ja existeix Category:Air raid shelters in the Land of Valencia. Els noms de categories genèriques van en anglès, però pel nom d'un element en concret no veig problema en posar el nom local ja que és difícil trobar literatura en anglès. En el cas valencià, si no està clar si el nom local és català o castellà, doncs l'anglès per la part genèrica pot ser una solució. --V.Riullop (talk) 09:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:No canvies senda vella per novella, Museu Faller de València.JPG

File:No canvies senda vella per novella, Museu Faller de València.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/Joanbanjo⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

**2012 Picture of the Year**: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La Creu Coberta

L'altre dia ens adonàrem de que les garites del Parc d'Enginyers i del Parc d'Artilleria del carrer Sant Vicent les havien demolit. Com que no les haviem fotografiades (estavem tan acostumats a vore-les que les teniem per eternes) eixirem de safari pel barri i la meua dona va fer unes dotzenes de fotos de coses que no tenen el futur massa assegurat. Si mires en la categoria La Creu Coberta i en les subcategories que penjen d'ella potser trobes coses per a classificar. Hem fet ja alguna feina, però confie més en el teu criteri.

Moltes gràcies.

B25es (talk) 10:22, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Joanbanjo,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categoria:Celtis australis in Catalonia

Cal que revisis aquesta categoria que t'ha quedat penjada. Un saludo.--Isidre blanc (talk) 19:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cavallerisses

B25es (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

¿Saps l'horari? Dissabtes pel matí els tinc ocupats, però si fóra de vesprada ens agradaria anar. B25es (talk) 17:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Finalista WIki Loves Earth

Bon dia,

S'acaben de publicar les 10 fotografies finalistes de Wiki Loves Earth per a les diverses categories:

http://wikilovesearth.wikimedia.cat/

Ens complau informar-te que entre aquestes hi ha alguna fotografia teva que està nominada com a finalista. El lliurament de premis tindrà lloc el proper 2 de juliol a les 19 a la Sala Cotxeres del Palau Robert de Barcelona. Allà desvetllarem qui són els guanyadors dels diferents premis. Estaria molt bé t'hi apropessis. Preguem confirmeu la vostra assistència contestant a aquest missatge. Atentament,--Kippelboy (talk) 14:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trinquet de Pelayo

Sí. Trobe que eixe seria el millor nom ;)--Coentor (talk) 19:50, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bon dia!

Quina feinada de subcategorització! --Enfo (talk) 16:08, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Setmana de l'arquitectura

¡Hola! Volia dir-te que m'han passat aquest enllaç que pot-ser t'interesse. B25es (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Antonio Muñoz Degraín per Miquel Blay, Museu de Belles Arts de València.JPG

Yours sincerely, Discasto _{talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis} 13:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Joanbanjo! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 01:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Te comería a versos inscriptions in Valencia

Ens atrevim a buscar tots? ;)--Coentor (talk) 13:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gràcies per categoritzar per carrers

Com has pogut vore, he aconseguit, per Flickr, un bon grapat de fotos de graffitis. El problema és que en ser tants, la categorització serà difícil, i acabaran molts fitxers a poques categories. Gràcies per categoritzar per carrers, em facilita la faena de crear subcategories.--Coentor (talk) 09:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi and thanks for your work :-) I have a question: why this removal? --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 16:31, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monument a Alcoi

Se que, com a descripció i nom, doncs no ajuda massa, però no puc aportar molta més informació. Tota informació extra serà agraïda.--Coentor (talk) 12:55, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unes quantes fotos més

Diumenge passat varem donar una volteta. Hem pujat fotos de Casinos, Sacanyet, Teresa, Gàtova i Marines. B25es (talk) 17:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moltes gràcies! B25es (talk) 14:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Birds in L'Oceanografic

Please be careful when recategorising. Those birds were "in the water outside L'Hemisfèric" not "in L'Oceanografic". Thanks -- KTC (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exposició

Hola. Hem fet una petita exposició per a Wikimedia España. A hores d'ara està penjada a l'IES Juan de Garay. Hem fet ús de la teua foto Edifici de Santa Maria Micaela de València, de l'arquitecte Santiago Artal Ríos.JPG. L'hem ficada a una secció sobre llocs propers per tal d'animar a la gent a fer-ne més. Gràcies pel teu treball. B25es (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bots

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Gràcies per participar en Wiki Loves Earth 2015!

Benvolgut Joanbanjo:

En nom d'Amical Wikimedia i la resta d'institucions que organitzen Wiki Loves Earth, volem donar-te les gràcies per la teva participació en aquest concurs i et volem convidar a l'acte de lliurament de premis que tindrà lloc el proper dia 15 de juliol a les 19 hores al Museu de Ciències de Barcelona (Plaça del Fòrum, 1). Pots trobar tota la informació sobre l'acte al web del concurs wikilovesearth.cat

Cordialment, Amical Wikimedia --KRLS Bot (talk) 14:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi, Joanbanjo. I've seen your work: "File:Casc amb doble cimera, Hallstatt, tomba 259, exposició El Regne de la Sal.JPG" (Double-crested helmet, Hallstatt grave No. 259, around 600 BC.). Good job! I beg you to picture here - pic. 19 General view of the Combat helmet from city Vače, Slovenia (in Russian language "Рис. 19. Общий вид шлема из города Вач" - http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0211/005a/02110009.htm), inscribed with runes. And - pic. 16 Military Armor-particle (Cuirass) of VII century BC from Stična, Slovenia (in Russian language "Рис. 16. Воинский доспех из Стичны VII века до н.э.", identify here - http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0211/005a/02110009.htm), inscribed with runes. Regards --Krupski Oleg (talk) 10:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

La Vall d'Alba

Ahir varem estar de safari per La Vall d'Alba (amb les pedanies de La Pelejana, La Pelejaneta i La Barona), Figueroles i l'Alcora. A la Vall d'Alba trobarem un fum de plaques commemoratives amb els noms del President (Zaplana o Camps), l'alcalde (no recorde el seu nom) i Carlos Fabra. Fins i tot hi ha casos com una església construida pel bisbat en terres donades per una família o una estàtua finançada integrament per una altra... i el Fabra hi és al cartell! La qüestió és que intentarem fer una categoria coherent. Hi havia més plaques: ens avorrirem de fer-ne tot el temps de la mateixa cosa.
T'ho dic perque tu tens més mà per aixó de la categorització. Pot ser se t'ocorreix alguna categoria més.
De les plaques hi ha dues que no són de C.F. Una és la dels Caídos. Una altra, a l'ermita de Sant Cristòfol, recorda a un altre Fabra, el de 1906.

B25es (talk) 16:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ayora

Per si de cas! B25es (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hem fet el wikitakes i encara que no hem sigut molta gent, s'hi han fet un grapat de fotos. He afegit més categories de coses d'Aiora. Si pots pegar una ullada, pense que hi haurà més en els pròxims dies i procuraré categoritzar-ho tot adequadament, però una col·laboració vindrà be. Gràcies. B25es (talk) 18:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! A gift from fellow Wikipedians

Hi Joanbanjo,

You have been nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation through our Merchandise Giveaway program (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Merchandise_giveaways). Congratulations and thank you for your hard work!

Please email us at [email protected] and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt.

Thanks!

Demà a València

Hola. Hi ha una iniciativa de la Diputació per a demà ([2]) que permet visitar el palau de la Plaça de Manises 4. Pensem anar-hi. Abans anirem de visita amb una gent del Col·legi d'Arquitectes. Comença al Col·legi del Corpus Christi a les 10 i s'anomena "Murs" ([3]). Encara que demanen preinscripció, avui hem anat a una altra de les seues activitats i de fet tothom és benvingut, preinscrit o no. B25es (talk) 15:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I moltes gràcies per les categories d'Aiora.

File:Sulcorebutia cv. "Solantana", caseta del Romaní, jardí botànic de València.JPG

File:Sulcorebutia cv. "Solantana", caseta del Romaní, jardí botànic de València.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Juniperbushman (talk) 13:45, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ValenciaGrill.JPG‎

Thank you Joanbanjo for catogorizing my photos more precisely. This specific photo (File:ValenciaGrill.JPG‎) was twice deleted by User: Latemplanza from https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reja_(arquitectura), for reasons that I do not understand. Since I saw a photo of the same court in your discussion page, I would ask your kind help to undelete my photo if you find Latemplanza's deletion unjustified. I cannot speak any Spanish... Thanks & Merry Christmas! איתן טל -Etan J. Tal (talk) 23:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pregunta de nota

Hola! El cap de setmana passat vaig baixar a València i vaig visitar Sant Miquel dels Reis. Baixant per l'escala que hi ha darrere l'església es veien per la finestra unes alqueries enmig de l'horta (són les que apareixen en aquesta pàgina del Google Maps). Saps com es diuen? Per cert, com es diu aquesta zona d'horta que hi ha entre Sant Miquel dels Reis, Tavernes Blanques, Alboraia i l'avinguda dels Germans Machado? Molt agraït per endavant! --Enric (talk) 02:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aprovat, sí senyor! Algun dels documents que m'has passat ja els havia trobat, però no havia trobat la referència de les dues cases, i per això no vaig saber identificar-les. Pel que fa al nom, havia trobat racó de Sant Llorenç i horta de Sant Miquel dels Reis, i no sabia decidir-me per quin de tots dos. Moltes gràcies per tot! En tan sols dos dies vaig fer més de 800 fotos, i vaig aprofitar per visitar llocs de la ciutat que no coneixia, com Sant Miquel dels Reis, el parc de Marxalenes, l'Almodí, el Museu de la Ciutat, la cripta de Sant Vicent, la casa de les Roques, la Casa Museu Benlliure, el MuVIM o l'església de Sant Nicolau, i vaig pujar a les torres dels Serrans, que a dalt no hi havia estat mai. Els llocs més turístics (la Catedral, la Llotja, el Mercat Central, la basílica de la Mare de Déu, l'IVAM, el Centre del Carme, la Beneficència, la Ciutat de les Arts i les Ciències o el xalet de Blasco Ibáñez de la Malva-rosa) ja me'ls coneixia d'altres vegades. Ah, i vam aprofitar també per recorre'ns el Cabanyal i el Canyamelar de dalt a baix! En fi, que van ser uns dies profitosos. La setmana que ve me'n vaig cap a Mallorca per segona vegada i també cauran unes quantes fotos hehehe. Moltes gràcies per tot! --Enric (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gràcies!

Gràcies Joanbanjo! Gran feina la que fas categoritzant ací a Commons, mai estarà prou reconeguda.--Pacopac (talk) 17:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Una altra pregunta...

Continuant amb les fotos del periple valencià, en tinc una d'aquest edifici, diria que és l'únic que hi ha al c. Blanqueria a la banda que toca al riu, davant mateix del convent de Sant Josep i al costat del pont homònim. Saps què és? Ho estic buscant per diverses fonts i no ho trobo... --Enric (talk) 18:50, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gràcies! Jo he continuat buscant també, i l'únic que vaig trobar va ser que a la Guia de carrers de València hi deia «Dispensari». --Enric (talk) 11:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uns afegitons més

Hola. Hem aprofitat estos dies per a traure fotos d'alguns llocs més. Quesa, Xella, Estubeny, Rotglà i Corberà, i Benimuslem. A més també hem anat a fer-ne per al concurs de Llocs de la Guerra Civil (la sòcia en té un fum de València, a més de gaire de Torrent, la Reva, Alpont, el Villar i altres coses); pense que algunes coses més del País sortiran a aquest concurs. Moltes gràcies per Anna, que faltava totalment. La Costera, la Safor i la Vall d'Albaida són les comarques on más buits hi queden. Anem fent coses, però no hi arribem a tots els llocs. Però ja saps, entre tots ho farem tot.

Estem organitzan per al 9 d'abril una expedició a l'Horta de Vera amb el suport de la Secció de la Dona de l'Ajuntament de València i de la Universitat Politècnica. Hem de facilitar un llistat per a l'accés al Politècnic (ens deixen lloc per a editar).

B25es (talk) 11:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wiki Takes Camí de Vera

Bon dia. Ahir anàrem a fer el wiki-takes. N'eren uns deu i la gent va pujant les fotos. Pense que en trobaràs d'interesants. Per exemple, hi han bones del Molí de Farinós, a la frontera amb Alboraia. Estic fent una mica de categorització. Com que el terreny que varem recòrrer fa part de dos barris (La Carrasca a l'est i Camí de Vera a l'oest) a voltes la gent ha embolicat la categoria. No és massa greu, ja estic corregint errades. La cosa és que hi ha llocs dels que he trobat el nom: Casa Carles (senzill, ho fica a la façana), Casa del Moreno, Casa del Ferrero, Casa Zarza, Alqueria de Bayarri (eixa està tocant l'autovia i amb l'ampliació de segur que l'enderroquen). Si post pegar una ullada per si de cas coneixes més noms o si trobes altres errades, t'ho agrairia un fum. B25es (talk) 10:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti a Altea, Marina Baixa.JPG

File:Graffiti a Altea, Marina Baixa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ras67 (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinturas

Estoy organizando un poco las pinturas de Valencia y, como algunas ya están incluidas en sus respectivos museos, por eso les he quitado la categoría de Paintings in Valencia, en la que de ser posible sólo deben figurar las pinturas de los museos y las que no tengan categoría propia.

Aprovecho para felicitarle por sus magníficas fotos.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 14:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

En cuanto que me he puesto a arreglar el Museo de Bellas Artes de Valencia, allá que va usted detrás de mi. Le ruego, ya que se ha puesto a hacerlo, que procure hacerlo bien, porque, y sólo por poner un ejemplo, este cuadro lo ha categorizado mal. ¿Por qué no me deja a mi hacerlo?.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 13:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Le ruego que me deje hacer a mí lo del museo más que nada porque he sido yo quien ha comenzado y sobre todo porque conozco la estructura general, que yo mismo estoy procurando crear. Aunque soy cordobés, habrá observado que soy extremadamente respetuoso con la lengua catalana, y que no se me puede acusar de proespañolista, porque las categorías del museo las estoy poniendo en catalanglish, como por ejemplo Male portrait paintings in the Museu de Belles Arts de València.

De los varios centenares de cuadros del museo que hay subidos a Commons, yo mismo he subido por lo menos algunas docenas, sobre todo de retratos, y ahora que me puesto a arreglar el museo tengo intención, si Dios quiere, de subir bastantes más. Además, es una pinacoteca impresionante, y por hay que ir despacito y con buena letra. Ya sé que usted ha subido miles de fotos del Levante español, y yo, modestia aparte, ya he arreglado las pinturas de docenas de museos españoles y también las obras de muchos pintores concretos. Y de hecho, hace pocos días terminé de arreglar todas las obras del Greco ubicadas en museos españoles, que no es moco de pavo.

No tengo intención de llevarme mal con usted, sino al contrario, pero déjemelo a mi por favor.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 13:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santceloni-santaeulaliatapioles-6937-01.jpg

Hi Joanbanjo,

I trust you are fine. You described the above work as "own work". Are you ca:user:amadalvarez?. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 19:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comentarle una cosa

Quería pedirle un favor, aunque por supuesto sin obligación ninguna por su parte. Estoy procurando arreglar los museos de la Comunidad Valenciana, y por lo menos crear páginas de INSTITUTION para ellos siempre que sea posible y/o recomendable, porque hay museos que no constan en los ficheros de autoridades como VIAF.

Lo mío son las pinturas, pero no la arqueología, por eso venía a proponerle que, si tiene usted tiempo y valor y le interesa el tema de la Arqueología, intente poner un poco de orden en el Museo de Prehistoria de Valencia y en el Museo de Arqueología de Alicante, por ponerle dos ejemplos. Yo lo haría de mil amores, pero lo cierto es que para clasificar antiguedades y objetos arqueológicos hay que saber mucho más del tema de lo que yo sé. Pero si usted se anima, o sabe de alguien que pudiera estar interesado, lo dejo en sus manos.

He acudido a usted porque me da lástima que unos museos tan destacados estén tan mal organizados y porque es usted uno de los que más fotografías ha subido de Valencia y de toda la Comunidad Valenciana, (por no decir el que más con gran diferencia, lo que le honra). Un cordial saludo.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sueca - Arròs - Paella

Bon dia. Diumenge 11 de setembre anirem a Sueca per al Concurs Internacional de Paella Valenciana. Amb aquest motiu estem quedant uns quants socis i no socis de Wikimedia Espanya per a fer una invasió fotogràfica de la vila i del propi concurs. Si et vols afegir, tenim una pàgina per apuntar-se [4] i hem trobat molta col·laboració de part de l'organització del Concurs i de l'Ajuntament. Sueca és molta Sueca, ja ho saps. B25es (talk) 07:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De estos polvos vinieron estos barros. Anarem a Sueca i ferem unes poques fotos. A hores d'ara anem per 533 pujades. Hi ha del Concurs i també del poble. Estic obrint categories noves (ara mateix crec que n'he afegit unes 60) i vaig categoritzant. Però totes les fotos les pots trobar a Category:Images from Wiki Takes Sueca, que és la que utilitzem per a mesurar com va la cosa. Si trobes categories a faltar o el que siga, just help yourself. Pense que aquesta vesprada n'en pujaràn més gent, perquè de moment només ho fa fet la meua dona. B25es (talk) 08:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming!

Dear Joanbanjo,

As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again.

We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es

If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here.

We look forward to your free images!

Sincerely,

The team of Wiki Loves Monuments edition in Spain

Category:Comarques in the province of Valencia

Para que la plantilla {{Provinces of Spain}} funcione en las categorías contenidas en Category:Comarcas of Spain by province todas las categorías deben tener un prefijo igual en el nombre, por eso estoy renombrandolas de "comarques" a "comarcas", ya que el primero sólo se puede usar en las provincias de Catalunya y País Valencià. --JT Curses (talk) 14:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Bust del mestre Josep Serrano, museu de la Ciutat de València.jpg

And also:

File:Teodor Llorente i Olivares, obra de Marià Benlliure (1909).jpg

Yours sincerely, Discasto _talk 16:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

M'ajudes a categoritzar-les bé?

Hola Joanbanjo, pots fer-li una ullada a

Costers per fer la parada de la séquia 01.jpg i a

Costers per fer la parada de la séquia 02.jpg

i millorar la categorització? Li he fet una ullada i no sé quina seria la més adient. Gràcies --Pacopac (talk) 21:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moltes gràcies Joanbanjo! Millorades les categories i localitzat a un poblet de l'Horta Nord ;-) --Pacopac (talk) 21:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prehistòria

Supose que la millor manera seria anar classificant les fotos per exposicions. Puc consultar al personal del museu quan estiga allà i vore quina classificació utilitzem. Una vegada creades les categories, és fer una recategorització massiva. Si tens cap idea, seran benvingudes, també pots vindre al museu un dia .--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ja tinc resposta. En creu crearé les categories

--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ja tenim les Categories creades. Intentaré omplir-les segons les meues capacitats per a reconéixer els fondos.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quería pedirle un favor

Encantado de saludarle. Quería pedirle un favor. He estado arreglando un poco las pinturas del Museo Diocesano de Arte Sacro de Orihuela, pero no hay ninguna foto del museo y la verdad es que yo no sé ni siquiera dónde está emplazado, porque a lo mejor está en la catedral o algo así. ¿Tiene usted alguna foto del museo por casualidad? Yo para casos como estos suelo mirar en Flickr para ver si hay algo que poder subir a Commons, pero en este caso no ha sido posible, y como sé que usted abarca toda la Comunidad Valenciana, por eso se lo pido.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 18:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Les garrigues francaise

I see you erased the category Category:Garrigues from one of files showing the garrigues (landform). Please can you move these files to Category:Garrigue (sin esse) instead. Lo siento, no hablo catala.

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to [email protected].

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or [email protected]. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categoria duplicada

Hola Joanbanjo, he trobat estes dues categories duplicades: [[Category:Mountain huts in Aragon]] i [[Category:Pyrenees Aragón refuge]] com s'hauria d'actuar per fusionar-les? A commons no domine massa encara. Gràcies! --Pacopac (talk) 00:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cert! Anava errat, no m'havia adonat que eren una subcategoria de l'altra. He repassat els arxius d'ambdues categories, crec que ara està millor. Gràcies --Pacopac (talk) 05:43, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Falles

Hola Joanbanjo. Et contacte doncs eres l'usuari valencià més prolífic a Commons i veig que l'any passat apujares algunes fotos de Falles. Enguany hi haurà un concurs fotogràfic amb premis. L'única condició és apujar les fotos mitjançant este formulari durant el mes d'abril. Moltes gràcies.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Holis, em sap mal però enguany no podré fer cap foto de falles :(. T'ho deixe a tu que eres el fotofaller per excel·lència.--Joanbanjo (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Food in the Land of Valencia o cosa semblant

Hola! Ahir vàrem anar a la Safor i entre d'altres -que ja veig que les has trobades- prenguèrem aquesta foto File:Bizcocho de l'Alqueria de la Comtessa.jpg que he categoritzat de moment a L'Alqueria de la Comtessa (on compràrem el bescuit) i Food, perquè es pot menjar. Però no trobe categories de menjar ¿of/from/in? the Land of Valencia. Your wisdom is wellcome! B25es (talk) 12:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ja conteste jo, B25es: Category:Cuisine of the Land of Valencia, i més concretament Category:Confectionery of the Land of Valencia. Best whishes.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, sí, anava a contestar. Ja està el bescuit categoritzat. També està Food of the Land of Valencia però més com a producte, sense cuinar. Gràcies, una vegada més, per les fotos.--Joanbanjo (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr Ximo

No ús comercial i no ús derivat. No compatible. Hauré de parlar amb Amical per a que li pegue un calbot a Ximo.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

lògica del darrer canvi

Hola Joanbanjo, no acabe d'entendre la lògica del canvi que m'has fet ací https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Companies_of_the_Land_of_Valencia&curid=1422420&diff=238169561&oldid=236315913. Està explicat en algun lloc per guardar-m'ho i tindre-ho a mà? És que no li acabe de vore el trellat i sé que en té. --Pacopac (talk) 23:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah no, per a què el més pròxim temàticament estiga primer, potser són manies. O un poc de TOC, jo que sé. ---Joanbanjo (talk) 23:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Museums in Elx

Category:Museums in Elx i Category:Museums in Alacant, no estan a la província d'Alacant (Category:Museums in the province of Alicante)? .--JT Curses (talk) 22:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[5] .--JT Curses (talk) 22:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, però la categoria és redundant i innecessària, no cal complicar tant les coses, ja estan per tipus de museu o per city o el que siga.--Joanbanjo (talk) 22:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Si es fan categories de museus per províncies a la resta i hi ha prou elements per justificar cada categoria no crec que calgui fer una excepció per al País Valencià. --JT Curses (talk) 22:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Museums in the province of Alicante, en una primera classificació 11 subcategories i falta repassar les subcategories de tipus, els arxius, etc.--JT Curses (talk) 22:47, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evidentment que es pot fer una excepció, especialment si no feia falta crear la categoria. De les 11 subcategories que dius s'hagueren pogut classificar amb altres i no com ara, doblement categoritzades (com Category:Museo Arqueológico José María Soler de Villena, com archaeological i com a in the province of tal) Quin sentit té? Pense que es ganes de sobrecategoritzar, al final hi hauran categories loques com Category:Blue buildings in Vallès Oriental photographed in march 2009 --Joanbanjo (talk) 00:17, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Que un element es pugui classificar en una altra categoria pot ser que a tu et sembli innecessària, però si algú vol centrar-se en buscar museus en un territori determinat, hauria de rebuscar en totes les subcategrías de tipus i de ciutats per veure si troba el que busca . D'una categoria amb un nombre elevat de subcategories i fotos, totalment caòtica per qui accedeix per primera vegada per trobar alguna cosa (moltes de les subcategories nomes tenen el nom del museu, per saber on es aquell museu s'ha d'obrir la categoria y busca a quina categoria territorial esta), hem passat a una categoria on es poden seguir diversos camins depenent en què estàs interessat (territori, tipus, etc. Category:Museums_in_the_Land_of_Valencia).--JT Curses (talk) 00:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A mi em sembla més innecessària Category:Museums in the Land of Valencia by province per només 3 subcategories, ja existeix Category:Museums in Spain by province i que Category:Museums in the Land of Valencia tingui 6 subcategories en contes de 8 no veig que hi hagi un gran guany pel que fa a utilitat, però és una opinió personal.--JT Curses (talk) 01:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ja, l'he fet a la contra. Potser m'he columpiat. Si vols elimine les de les provinces que ara amb les altres subcategories de type quedaria més aseat. Bona nit.--Joanbanjo (talk) 01:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Si et refereixes a Category:Museums in the Land of Valencia by province, si que crec que no fa falta, però les de les tres províncies, jo les considero necessàries encara que sigui per no trencar el camí que s'inicia amb Category:Museums in Spain by province i, que a mida que es van clasifican arxius (no els de la categoria, si no els que encara no estan classificats, ben classificats, etc.), es va constatant la necessitat d'organitzar algunes categories, que és la raó per la qual em vaig posar amb Category:Museums_in_the_Land_of_Valencia (jo estava repassant i classificant altres categories), però no aniré més enllà aquest debat, ni desfaré res del que facis. Agraït per la teva bona disposició i una salutació.--JT Curses (talk) 20:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vall d'Albaida

Joanbanjo,

It would seem that you have some confusion about certain geographical locations and categories within Vall d'Albaida, in the province of Valencia.

For your information, the Paraje Municipal Natural of El Surar, which merits a category of its own, falls within the municipalities of Pinet and Llutxent, and is representative of both for those with and without local knowledge.

Additionally, El Surar lies on a variant of the Route of the Monasteries of Valencia, as can be seen by the numerous photographs of signposts for the Route taken, and duly tagged with their respective geolocations, within El Surar, and as such represents a noteworthy location on said Route for those wishing to find out information about the same.

These are simple examples which, independently of your personal preferences, can be easily verified by simple searches in the Interner or, alternatively, by physically visiting the locations themselves.

By placing such images within as many relevant and verifiable categories, they become easier to find for a greater number of users, which, as you surely know and which have already been informed of on your Talk page, is the purpose of their uploading to Wikicommons in the first place.

Furthermore, your desire to add additional categories, whilst simultaneously deleting existing categories without consultation, caused unnecessary, time consuming work which could be easily avoided through simple consultation with the user responsible for the original addition of the image, and the category, in question.

I hope this helps you to respect the contributions of others within Wikicommons to the diffusion of the natural and cultural heritage of Vall d'Albaida to the widest audience possible.

Hola! First of all thank you for uploading photos, go on :). I know where Pinet, Llutxent and el Surar are, but it seems that there is a problem of understanding how categories work. Is not a problem of personal preferences, mine or yours, the general rule is always place an image in the most specific categories, and not in the levels above those. See OVERCAT. For instance Category:Pinet (Vall d'Albaida) is a subcategory of Category:Populated places of Vall d'Albaida and Category:Municipalities in the province of Valencia, which in turn are subcategories of Category:Vall d'Albaida and Category:Province of Valencia and so on. The same for the route of the monasteries. I hope I have explained this as best I can. Ah, don't forget to sign your messages. --Joanbanjo (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ajuda per categoritzar senders

Bon dia! A [[Category:Hiking trails in the Land of Valencia]] volguera categoritzar els senders en de llag recorregut i de xicotet recorregut per separat, però enlloc trobe que eixes categories s'hagen usat ja. A [[Category:Hiking trails in Spain]] sí que apareix [[category:Long-distance paths in Spain‎]] però per als de petit recorregut PR no he vist res. Com ho faries tu? M'ajudes amb alguna proposta? Em venen grans les categories a Commons... Gràcies joanbanjo! --Pacopac (talk) 14:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Dooooncs, no sé. He mirat i no he vist a cap altre estat una categoria específica per als de petit recorregut. Només existeixen a l'estat espanyol? De moment ho deixaria com està, només hi ha cinc categories de PR. Si més avant s'ompli massa la categoria o es crea alguna cosa com short-distance paths si que estaria bé crear la categoria. Tampoc cal categoritzar al mil·límetre xD.--Joanbanjo (talk) 21:50, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diria que sols a l'estat espanyol hi són. Ja sé que no cal tot al mil·límetre, però veia interessant diferenciar els GR dels PR. Com vull crear-ne més de PR, si veig que creix ja la cree. Mil gràcies! --Pacopac (talk) 20:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

¿Puede saberse

porqué ha trasladado el nombre de la categoría del museo de Crevillente al catalán? Yo soy muy respetuoso con los regionalismos, y usted lo sabe bien, pero creo que ese traslado no es apropiado, o es que acaso los nombres de un museo, sólo por el hecho de estar en Valencia, deben ir en catalán?

Yo he creado la categoría con el nombre en español porque no domino el catalán.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 14:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! No hace falta que me trate de usted :). Hombre, pues estaria bien que las categorias de municipis valencianoparlantes estuviesen en valenciano, sí. No pasa nada si no domina el valenciano. También hubieras podido mirar su artículo en la viquipèdia. Y una cosilla, personalmente, con sólo dos fotos no creo que valga la pena crear la categoria. Saludos. --Joanbanjo (talk) 14:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A mi, francamente, me da igual que los nombres vayan en catalán o en castellano, pero usted debe comprender que como no domino el catalán es lógico que yo ponga los nombres en español. Si luego usted quiere trasladar los nombres al catalán es problema suyo.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vamos a ver

Estoy arreglando en Wikidata y también en Commons los museos de toda España, y precisamente ahora estoy con los únicos que me quedan, que son los de la Comunidad Valenciana. Eso que estoy haciendo lo he hecho en los museos de toda España y hasta ahora nadie se me ha quejado, sino al contrario, ya que han gradecido muchas de mis ediciones.

Es conveniente que las colecciones de los museos estén agrupadas, así como las fotografías del interior y del exterior de los museos.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 17:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lamentablemente esto no es una ciencia exacta, ojalá lo fuera pero no lo es. Ya sé que a veces es tontería crear categorías para unas pocas fotografías, pero piense que si se agrupan, luego pueden verse todas juntas en categorías superiores, por ejemplo la de Interiors of museums in the Land of Valencia.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 18:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iglesias

Le ruego que deje de ir revirtiendo mis ediciones, porque sé perfectamente lo que estoy haciendo y el únioo que se ha quejado hasta ahora es usted. Las iglesias de toda España ya están divididas en dos grandes grupos, interior y exterior, y precisamente esta misma noche voy a hablar con una administradora que conozco para ver si es posible que todas las categorías del exterior de las iglesias españolas queden agrupadas como ya lo están las del interior.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, le ruego que no me llame de usted hombre! Usted mismo admitió que es es tontería crear categorías para unas pocas fotografías no sé porque sigue haciendolo. Es sobrecategorización, veo más útil dejar la categoria principal como exterior por defecto y ya si se satura la categoria pues se hace alguna como facades of tal o exterior of cual si se requiere. Esto de Las iglesias de toda España ya están divididas en dos grandes grupos, interior y exterior básicamente se debe a su trabajito de hormiga, eh?--Joanbanjo (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

La verdad es que yo, por educación elemental, le hablo de usted a todo el mundo, y sobre todo a los usuarios a los que apenas conozco. Es cierto que muchas de las iglesias ya están divididas en interior y en exterior gracias a mi, pero no todas ni mucho menos, y además no soy yo el que ha inventado ese sistema, sino que lo aprendí de otros usuarios. Las únicas iglesias que aún me quedan por arreglar son las de la Comunidad Valenciana, y créame que lo hago con la mejor voluntad.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Estoy seguro que le guia la buena voluntad y ningún otro motivo :) Y bueno, lo aprendiste de otros, vale, pero estoy casi seguro que fue en grandes conjuntos monumentales con muchas fotos a los que si que les venía bien ese tipo o otra formas de categorizar, no le veo, otra vez, el sentido a hacerlo en iglesias pequeñitas de pueblos pequeñitos.--Joanbanjo (talk) 15:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Es inmensamente útil que el interior de las iglesias, cuando hay más de diez o quince fotografías, esté agrupado, porque para eso se inventaron las categorías de Interiors of churches in.... Y con respecto al exterior de los templos, ya le digo que voy a hablar con una administradora que conozco para ver si es posible que también todas esas categorías de exteriores estén agrupadas. Y al mismo tiempo aprovecho para felicitarle por sus espléndidas fotografías y por su inmenso trabajo en asuntos valencianos.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias, me pongo rojo. Coincidimos en lo de interiores por supuesto, y no en lo de exteriores claro. Para qué crear grandes árboles de categorias analógos a lo de interiores? Es doblar categorías, complica las cosas, le sigo sin ver la utilidad, lo siento.--Joanbanjo (talk) 16:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mírelo de esta manera: si los interiores de las iglesias ya están agrupados a nivel estatal, ¿Por qué no los exteriores? Naturalmente, ni se me ha pasado por la cabeza crear ponerme a hacerlo sin antes hablar con un administrador.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 16:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Porque para exteriores ya estaba la categoria principal hasta que se fue complicando la cosa xD. Ya le he diche que las veo más o menos útiles donde hagan falta, no que por defecto tooodas tengan que tenerla. Usted me dijo que no esto no es una cencia exacta, no hace falta ser tan cuadriculado.Joanbanjo (talk) 16:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vale, de acuerdo. Entonces agruparé las de los interiores y dejaré las del exterior sin tocarlas. Palabra de honor.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 16:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias, lo tendré en cuenta. Ya he terminado de arreglar los museos de la Comunidad Valenciana, puede estar tranquilo, y a partir de ahora lo que haré será ir subiendo imagenes de pinturas antiguas, que es mi verdadera pasión.Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cadaqués - CS 14072008 185851 29180.jpg

Hola Joanbanjo

Marcaste File:Cadaqués - CS 14072008 185851 29180.jpg como «una copia idéntica o una versión reducida de: File:WLM14ES - 14072008 185851 31166 - .jpg», pero File:Cadaqués - CS 14072008 185851 29180.jpg era una imagen de 2560×1920, siendo File:WLM14ES - 14072008 185851 31166 - .jpg de 1200×900, así que habría que haber subido primero la imagen de mayor resolución (o directamente fusionar las dos páginas).

Saludos

Platonides (talk) 22:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

duplicates

Hola Joanbanjo, como estas? When you tag images as duplicates, the {{Duplicate}} tag goes right on the duplicate image, usually above the infobox. Daphne Lantier 00:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a screenshot I made that shows you how to tag duplicate files: File:Duplicate tagging.png. Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dues coses: Albaida i contornada i geolocalització

Bon dia. Hem estant prenent fotos de municipis que no en tenien, i també de monuments i altres coses dels municipis que encara que estaven, en mancaven de varietat o de repressentació de certs llocs. La qüestió és que pel que fa als municipis, la província de Castelló ja està feta i de València en faltaven tres (Bufali, Bèlgida i Benissoda). Els hem fet aquesta setmana.

Aprofitat l'ocasió, també hem afegit fotos d'Albaida. Amb la nostra política eclèctica, a més de monuments hi ha coses com la caserna de la Guàrdia Civil o les vivendes socials del barri de la Verge del Pilar. La cosa és que no he col·laborat massa amb les categories perquè estic geolocalitzant fotos. Una mica a la brava: les del meu usuari, les de la meua dona, les del municipi de torn. Algunes teues n'he geolocalitzat. Estic utilitzant aquesta eina: [6].

Tornant dels Cerros de Úbeda, al País Valencià queden només onze municipis sense foto: Benferri, Benifallim, Benifato, Benijófar, Daya Nueva, Daya Vieja, Dolores, el Fondó de les Neus, Formentera del Segura, Orxeta i Rafal. La majoria del Deep South del Baix Segura.

La qüestió dels monuments la porta més la meua dona. Hi ha llistats en castellà i en català, amdos amb la característica comuna de ser imperfectes. Normalment acava per fer-se llistes ad-hoc depenent d'on anem. He tractat de fer una mica de ordre utilitzant una categoria invisible, però no és una cosa massa eficient ni currada.

I només una nota final. Hem anat a Bombas Gems. Les parts més cridaneres (celler, refugi) no són encara accessibles. Diuen que a octubre.

B25es (talk) 07:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

T'he traslladat una imatge per error

Per a harmonitzar amb esta imatge meua he traslladat sense voler esta teua (només afegint-li un «1» al final), convençut que l'havia pujada jo en primer lloc (he vist que no després d'haver pres el botó)... El canvi és mínim, però igual disculpa per la molèstia, promet comprovar millor l'autoria d'ara endavant. Qoan (dis-me!) 13:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Com si no t'haguera escrit res, pensava que no em podia desfer. Salut, Qoan (dis-me!) 13:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alboraia

Hola. El 12 de novembre pel matí anirem a fer un wikitakes a Alboraia. I ara estic obrint categories per a les coses que volem fotografiar. Les estic obrint a saco, potser no totes tinguen ús, peró ara mateix fan -en teoria- falta. T'ho deia perquè pot ser que hi hagi buildings que no siguin exactament buildings i coses així. Trobar-ne informació ha sigut complicat, d'algunes coses no sé com són i d'altres només les tinc localitzades aproximadament. Tot i això pensem fer-ne tots els llocs proposats posibles. I si vols vindre, ja saps que estàs invitat. B25es (talk) 17:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manhole covers

La meua dona es va trobar aquesta claveguera: Category:Riuà memorial manhole covers. B25es (talk) 18:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anda, què curiós, clavegueram personalitzat. N'hi han moltes més? Per on? Per si alguna volta me'n trobe alguna i li faig un retrato. Li he afegit la categoria Flooding of October 1957 in Valencia ;)--Joanbanjo (talk) 02:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Una altra cosa, ja que estem, mirant les fotos he vist que esta, File:Iglesia de los Santos Juanes de Valencia B.jpg, és de l'església de sant Nicolau; esta File:Iglesia de los Santos Juanes de Valencia A.jpg trobe que també però no estic segur. Una abraçada.

Category:Balconies in Ronda

If this is going to be useful, you need to create Category:Balconies in Ronda. - Jmabel ! talk 16:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Plan General de Ordenación Urbana de Valencia

Estic pujant fitxes de monuments procedents del PGOU de València. Pense que les pots trobar d'utilitat. B25es (talk) 14:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pense que la majoria de les imatges dintre de les fitxes no serán lliures. He ficat algunes categories, però molt poques. Moltes gràcies pel teu suport! B25es (talk) 13:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Consell Metropolità de l'Horta

Hola. Hem trobat dues trapes de claveguera a Alaquàs, signades pel Consell Metropolità de l'Horta. Fins ara no hi havia cap categoria i l'he oberta (category:Consell Metropolità de l'Horta (València). El que no tinc massa clar és on clavar eixa categoria. Mira si pots passar-te i afegir o modificar el que calga.

I moltes gràcies pels helipads & helidecks!

B25es (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Files from Visentico / Sento Flickr stream needing cleanup

Hola, Joan, gracias por ayudar a categorizar las imágenes que estoy subiendo de este usuario de Flickr. Me atrevo a pedirte una cosa más. Si revisas una imagen y la categorizas adecuadamente, elimina también la categoría Category:Files from Visentico / Sento Flickr stream needing cleanup. Me fío de tu criterio y no tiene sentido que invierta yo también tiempo en algo que ya está revisado. ¡¡¡Gracias!!! --Discasto _talk 18:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Puebla images

I saw you made some edits to a few of my recent photographs from Puebla, and I wanted to thank you for helping with categorization. I had such a great time in the city. If you're able to identify any of the images at User:Another Believer/Puebla without captions, you're welcome to add appropriate categories. I created a similar gallery for Mexico City: User:Another Believer/Mexico City, if you happen to be familiar. Either way, happy editing! -Another Believer (talk) 05:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Emparam

Hola Joanbanjo, has canviat el nom de la categoria (cosa que em sembla bé), però jo he seguit el patró usat en els anys anteriorsː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ofrena_de_flors_a_la_Mare_de_D%C3%A9u_dels_Desamparats Caldria canviat els anys anteriors també? Salutǃ Pacopac (talk) 22:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

per si pots mirar-t'ho

(no sé com etiquetar a d'algú en la discussió)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:La_taverna#Apropiaci%C3%B3_dels_drets_d'autor

Pacopac (talk) 21:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Art in Gata de Gorgos

Diferencia entre revisiones: ¿Gata de Gorgos no pertenece a la provincia de Alicante?. --JT Curses (talk) 22:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
		Dear Joanbanjo, Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? We think you are. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag. You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

mountains or hills

Hola Joanbanjo, (espere que estigues tu i els teus bé de salut)

Vaig crear fa temps la categoria Category:Views from mountains in the Land of Valencia per a categoritzar entre d'altres la Serra Perenxisa, que és més bé baixeta.

Sense recordar el que havia fet, remenant per a crear Category:Views of Quart de les Valls from Muntanya de La Creu he vist que existia Category:Views from hills, i jo he creat Category:Views from hills in Spain. I ara tinc el dubte de si seria més correcte usar esta darrera per a la Serra Perenxisa, i on estaria el límit entre mountain i hill. Pots fer-li una ullada i donar-me la teua opinió?

Moltes gràcies! Pacopac (talk) 16:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Com sempre, de gran ajuda. Prenc nota i mire d'arreglar-ho una miqueta. Gràcies i paciència. Pacopac (talk) 19:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El teu cudol

https://www.valenciabonita.es/2016/08/25/la-historia-del-cudol-de-torrefiel/ ;-) Pacopac (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quin és el criteri?

Hola Joanbanjo, has tret la categoria Category:Buses in Valencia però el títol de l'arxiu fa referència just a d'això, a l'autobús mal aparcat. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2016_03_22_Males_pr%C3%A0ctiques_aparcant_autobusos_a_Vivers,_els_alumnes_han_d%27invadir_el_carril_bici_del_carrer_General_El%C3%ADo_02.jpg&curid=83052070&diff=408893813&oldid=370380031&diffmode=source

Quin és el criteri per a categoritzar, si l'element hi és? Gràcies Pacopac (talk) 05:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ostres, no me n'havia adonat de la intenció de la foto. Com era poc visible l'he treta, perdó. El criteri que seguisc és que siga ben visible l'element categoritzat (no en el fons en una vista general per exemple), però si la foto té eixe objectiu cap problema. Una abraçada. Ah, i gràcies per lo del cudol! --Joanbanjo (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Muralles de València ciutat

Hola Joanbanjo. He tractar de ficar una mica d'ordre a la Categoria City walls of València.

El tema estava força desordrenat. De partida el llistat de monuments de la Generalitat no parla de la muralla romana, i parla de "muralla medieval" quan al periode es varen construir dues, una al segle XI i una altra al XIV. Un bon embolic de partida, que s'ha extès als llistats de Wiki Loves Monuments i als de ca:wiki i es:wiki, i de seguides a Wikidata.

He obert subcategories per a les muralles romana, del segle XI i del segle XIV. He obert alguna categoria d'elements concrets, com els trams del carrer Palomino o del Centre Octubre. El cas peculiar de la Porta de la Mar, que a hores d'ara és una obra de Goerlich de 1944, he optat per no afegir-la ni a cap de les tres muralles "feten".

He afegit en cada categoria la fitxa del Catàleg de Béns Protegits del PGOU de València -és un anexe a una norma legal i per tant es pot pujar a Commons- de manera que tenim ben definides cadascuna de les muralles.

Lamente no poder ajudar més amb el tema, però només m'hi he clavat per poder acabar els Q dels monuments del País Valencià. Em queden ja pocs, però per aixó mateix tendeixen a ser gaire complexos. Espere no haver trancat res!

Una abraçada!

B25es (talk) 09:47, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~ removal of categories ~ File:Ira Hobart Evans ~ Plaque.jpg ~

Nice to meet you! Can I ask you why you are removing categories on this file ~ I am reverting your edits if you would like to discuss, let do it on the file's talk page ~ ~ Regards Mitchellhobbs (talk) 13:50, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos de la Beneficència

Hola! He afegit tot de fotos de la Beneficència i dels museus que conté, de quan vam fer la Viquitrobada a València. Com que he vist que tu n'hi havies posades un munt, t'agrairia que hi donessis un cop d'ull per si les he categoritzades bé. N'hi havia algunes del Museu d'Etnologia (unes postals, una màquina d'escriure) que no sé ben bé de quina sala eren i les he col·locades a la categoria genèrica del Museu. Espero que hi estiguis ben entretingut. I gràcies! --Enric (talk) 20:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, com va? Doncs molt ben categoritzades, bona memòria quatre anys després. La màquina d'escriure i les postals no les ubique (alguna expo temporal?), potser @TaronjaSatsuma: que té més mà al museu o @B25es: també. Recentment han renovat la museografia i han fet una incursió fotogràfica, si categoritzen un poc podria ajudar a identificar-les. Bé, una abraçada. --Joanbanjo (talk) 03:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Si enllaceu les fotos, potser les identifique. A més, dijous tinc previst parlar amb gent del museu i preguntar és gratis. B25es (talk) 06:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bon dia a tots tres, @Joanbanjo: , @B25es: i @TaronjaSatsuma: . En aquesta pàgina hi trobareu les fotos de València que vaig carregar l'altre dia. A reveure! --Enric (talk) 11:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ara ho mire, la màquina supose que és la biblio de l'Etno.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 18:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie a te

Grazie a te x il tuo lavoro su Roma ! :) --Lalupa (talk) 22:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti per l'eixida del refugi del castell, Dénia.jpg

File:Graffiti per l'eixida del refugi del castell, Dénia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foios, altar lateral de l'esgléia de l'Assumpció.jpg

File:Foios, altar lateral de l'esgléia de l'Assumpció.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Chantellesarah (talk) 23:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Museu de la Setmana Santa Marinera + Museu de l'Arrós + Molí d'Umbert i Serra

Bon dia. Hui he anat a totes eixes coses que són al mateix lloc. Buscava informació sobre la Fàbrica de Roca al Camí de les Moreres (pots buscar-la a Wikidata Q107423979, però no a la realitat: va ser enderrocada fa anys) i no en tenen cap; la dona encarregada és molt amable, però sap que no té documentació, però pregunta molt.

Hi ha una mescla de coses i només una categoria. El museu de la Setmana Santa és una guerra, el del arròs n'és una altra i l'edifici és força interessant per ell mateix. Si un dia s'emporten els contiguts dels museus encara romandrà un monument d'arquitectura industrial curiòs.

Tractaré de separar unes coses d'unes altres.

B25es (talk) 13:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Les fonts del Jardí d'Aiora

Continue amb els Bens Immobles d'Etnologia (BIE). Ara estic amb fonts de València ciutat, una font de maldecaps. Al Jardí d'Aiora hi han al menys dues fonts. Voràs que lis he fet categories. La que té classificació com BIE és la utilitària. Sorprenentment, la més bonica i decorativa no està en el llistat. Pense que qui va fer la fitxa per a la Generalitat es va enganyar de font, però "donde hay capitán no manda marinero": he creat el Q de data (d:Q107677175) de la que menciona el catàleg oficial. Pel que fa a les fotos, al menys en tenim de les dues. El dubte que tinc és si no hi haurà alguna font més pel jardí. Tot açò era per a explicar-te les dues categories noves.

Un altre cas són les fonts del Cementeri General, que oficialment són dues, i que quan varen fer les fitxes una estava en un magatzem després de ser restaurada. No sé si són les mateixes, on estan exactament... fins i tot podrien estar encara emmagatzemades. De moment he deixat fets els Q (d:Q107676464 i d:Q107677010) i ja m'acostaré a dotorejar el cementeri una volta més. Són fonts utilitàries, no massa distintives.

B25es (talk) 10:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, bona faena com sempre i perdó per tardar en contestar, se me'n va. Sí, de vegades és complicat separar la institució (el museu) de l'edifici que l'allotja (el molí), per això preferisc no categoriztar-ho tot al mínim, però bé si son Béns millor que tinguen categoria. I pel que fa a les fonts gran treball també (potser posaria alguna pega d'algun nom xD), poc a poc estaran totes, si no estan totes les que es poden, incloses les que tenen amagades.

I que dir de lo de Castalla, molt bé, la wiki o la Generalitat vos hauria de pagar la gasolina. Una queixeta, mireu un poc la qualitat de les fotos abans de penjar (per ex: File:Iglesia de la Asunción de Castalla 12.jpg o File:Iglesia de la Asunción de Castalla 30.jpg), si voleu, no vull quedar com un tiquismiquis :). Ara mire si puc ajudar en algo, una baraçada forta. --Joanbanjo (talk) 17:23, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He repassat amb 19Tarrestnom65 les fotos de Castalla i les dos són errades. Una és directament no res. L'altra no era per pujar. Però com sempre va en plan industrial, si li'n colen d'eixes i de pijors.
Ara hi ha en funcionament un concurs [7] de fotografía dels Espais Valorians. L'organitza molta gent, però no pujen massa fotos. De fet volien veure si un tal Joanbanjo, que té fotos molt bones de per eixos llocs, pujaria unes quantes fotos més. T'ho dic i fas el que vulgues. Una altra cosa és que el 30 d'octubre hi ha un wiki takes a Castalla [8]. Si vols vindre, és passar el matí. No controlem massa el poble però volem acabar-lo. Una abraçada B25es (talk) 14:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pizarro 1

Hola. Estic afegint Q en Wikidata i he fet el que correspon a l'edifici del Carrer Pizarro 1 Q109062259. Fa cantó amb Colom; com a nota peculiar, és on té la seu Falange. En 1943 li va reformar la façana J. Goerlich i per aixó ix als llibres d'arquitectura. M'extranya que no tinga foto, de fet pense que alguna hi ha. Però no les trobe. Per si en tens o saps on estan. B25es (talk) 09:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, gràcies per avisar (i pel treball que feu). Mira a vore si tinc alguna cosa i si m'arrime més per la zona i faig alguna foto regulera :). Sobre l'edifici, doncs no m'havia fixat. Tampoc he trobat fotos. El mateix, si això li tire alguna foto si no s'avanceu (que serà el més segur). Una abraçada.--Joanbanjo (talk) 22:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PD:Mira't si pots les fonts del cementeri ;)

Re:

Bueno, vale, quedamos en eso. CFA1877 (talk) 00:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unes poques fotos de CIutat Vella

¡Hola! Hui matí hem pegat una batuda per Ciutat Vella. Hem fet unes quantes fotos de la zona de l'avinguda de l'Oest, per omplir buits a Wikidata. La majoria corresponen a edificis dels anys quaranta i cinquanta, que vaig catalogar hi perque eixen a un paper d'Arquitectura. Hi ha més coses les quals igual trobes interessants. Les puja 19Tarrestnom65, que les fa ella.

També hem fet alguna coseta per Sant Vicent, perquè estan enderrocant les tanques de l'antic parc d'enginyers. Tenim una foto sorprenent del 258 de Sant Vicent, què té un pati tot complet, en ús i bon estat, que mai no es podia veure des del carrer.

Res més de moment!

B25es (talk) 17:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to a reflection

I invite you to a reflection after I saw that you once again removed a category, Category:Sculptures in Mola di Bari, from another category, Category:Monuments and memorials in Mola di Bari‎. This I can also understand can be interpreted as a classical memorial, the memorial with sculpture, be it a statue, or a complex of statues or a simple plaque with or without reliefs. In reality, at least here in Italy, but I believe also elsewhere, it is considered a monument also, for example, a building where a massacre has been committed, or a chapel dedicated to the memory of the fallen in some war or battle. This, Category:Monumento ai caduti (Villamarzana), was the home and store of the barber of the village, but since they executed the partisans, or allegedly so, has become a monument to their memory and to the victims, in general, of Nazi-fascism. You can not consider only the writing, the wall, or the sculpture with the number 43, is the whole, I hope it is clear. In conclusion, not all monuments, let alone memorials, are sculptures, but they could be, even when in that specific category there are still no images of that type, so, do me the courtesy, do not remove those categories, they are the result of years of work in inserting service categories that allow with the tools of Commons to quickly move an image from a parent category to the most correct and easiest to find for those who make specific searches. It doesn't cost you anything, there's no need to strictly adhere to the no over-categorization rule if it creates more problems than it wants to solve. Thanks for your attention.--Threecharlie (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Corpus

Hola! Ja estem arribant al Corpus. La pàgina del viquiprojecte la van actualitzant. Ja es sap alguna cosa més. Les Roques que a hores d'ara estan a l'Estació del Nord no desfilaran; però les Àligues, la Cuca-fera i altres elements sí aniran. Es a dir, que els actes seran una mica "reduïts" en quantitat d'elements. En compensació, pots fer fotos a l'estació.

Hi haurà passos de premsa i si en vols podries tindre. D'altra banda, si mires els actes voràs que hi ha un fum de coses dintre de les dues cavalcades i als actes que les envolten, aleshores, la miés es mucha y pocos los operarios.

Esperem que pugues participar-hi!

B25es (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Coses rares diverses "in the Land of Valencia"

Hola! Estic pujant de coses provinents de parents diversos i són força variades i potser estranyes. He trobar una invitació als Premis Octubre de 1974, pense que és la segona edició. Hi ha altres coses de taxes municipals que veig que les has trobades ja.

Dins de Category:Rosa Bueno stuff hi ha algunes coses pintoresques. La categoria és només una categoria invisible de control, les coses també porten categories "normals".

Respecte de "Valencia, Spain", últimament estic fent categories amb "València" amb accent. El problema és que pot haver-hi categories de les altres Valències, especialment de la de Califòrnia. Pense que la tilde ja serà una diferència suficient i el text queda curtet i apanyat. B25es (talk) 09:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alqueria trobada a Sant Antoni

Dissabte passat anàrem al barri de Sant Antoni, per allò de la festa, i ens hi trovàrem una alqueria. En tinc cinc fotos (per exemple File:Alqueria al barri de Sant Antoni, València 05.jpg) i les he ficades a les categories del barri i d'Alqueries de València. Està als carrers Agustí Centelles Ossó, Ministre Mayans, i Germans Fabrilo.

La qüestió és que estic convençut de que l'alqueria té nom propi. He mirat el plànol històric de la web de l'Ajuntament, poerò el nom no es llegisc. Com que és una alqueria caldria que tinguera protecció, però tampoc no he conseguit cap informació.

Pot ser tu sàpigues alguna cosa. (O per si vols fer-li millors fotos, que això es nota que no és lo meu)

Gràcies! B25es (talk) 09:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interiors

Virtually all interior-related categories are categorized as architectural elements, hundreds of them, so please stop making exceptions. --Orijentolog (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC) s[reply]

Hello, how's it going? tThe fact that they are all categorized like this (seems like a recent categorization) does not mean that it is correct or useful. It should go to the architecture category since it is not an element of the building. Regards Joanbanjo (talk) 02:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's going awful, what a mess all around! :) Technically speaking you're correct, because in strict sense at least half those categories under architectural elements by country/style are disputable as true architectural elements, you can find various things: interiors, exteriors, furniture, building parts, ornaments, details, etc. However, there's no better alternative at the moment, considering existing category tree (metacats). Currently, the major subcats for architectural styles are buildings, bridges, architectural elements, landscape architecture, fortifications, and architects. If I see some consensus to treat interiors or other topics separately, I'll gladly change those hundreds of categories to keep unification. Take care. --Orijentolog (talk) 03:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thanks for saying I'm correct, the consensus was already there before you changed it, just leave it as it was, there is no need for it to be in elements. I don't want to start an edit war, please. Regards Joanbanjo (talk) 03:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Can you please show me the consensus? Now I feel like an idiot... :( :) As I said, if there's a consensus I'll personally change everything. All I want is to keep unification and order, that's it. --Orijentolog (talk) 03:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus that existed before you changed it, pretty easy ;) Joanbanjo (talk) 04:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in the Internet Archive you can pretty easy check how categories like Romanesque architecture, Gothic architecture, Renaissance architecture, Baroque architecture, Historicist architecture, Baroque architecture looked like a year ago. There was an utter mess, tens of various categories without any order (something like e.g. Modernist architecture in Argentina now). So there was a consensus to keep mess?! :) I dare to say that I've made a significant improvement, just see all these categories now. This discussions about interiors and similar things are now simply sweet worries. Regarding the situation of interiors before, I was checking and there was nothing on talk pages, and as far as I remember in most cases interiors were under elements, so I followed it. And I know there are many similar disputable cases of not true elements like naves, tiles, furniture, etc.

Anyway, I prefer to keep the major subcats as they are at the moment, but I promise you that in a short time I'll contact other categorist colleagues who are working hardly on architectural cats (like Themightyquill, Allforrous, Elkost, Auntof6...) so we'll make a decision about it. Also, if in future you notice something dubious or have the slightest objection about anything I've done, feel free to ping me here. OK? :) --Orijentolog (talk) 04:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was nothing on the talk page because there was nothing to discuss, it seems clear. If a single element is not clear just leave it on the main page. And I don't see an improvement in necessarily bringing together categories that are barely related or with one or a few subcategories. In the Argentine example, maybe a litlle order would be ok but in general there you can see everything without having to navigate ino a multitude of almost empty pages. Maybe it's a matter of taste. Well, good night.

ps: baroque ephemeral architecture is not a condition nor a style, just architecture. Joanbanjo (talk) 04:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually there is, in The Handbook of Interior Architecture and Design I can see there are even professional disagreements about definition of interior. Here, they are treated as "an integral part of the structures that contain them – usually buildings" (John Pile). Therefore, in architectural elements, which contains also various building/structure parts. Not necessarily a building element, otherwise we would put architectural elements under buildings. I strongly disagree on leaving anything on the main page which is not a very primary topic.

Regarding the Argentina example, just look at the counter case, Gothic architecture in Germany. Germany has a lot of Gothic architecture, but it is reduced to seven major subcategories, and it takes a few seconds to find what you're looking for. On the very contrary, in Argentina it takes several minutes. If I search some famous house, perhaps it's under major category, perhaps under subcategory like buildings or houses, who knows. Perhaps it has English name, perhaps Spanish. And perhaps all mentioned is under alphabetic order, or perhaps keyed. The similar case is with 19th-century architecture in Spain (order) and 19th-century architecture in Russia (mess). However, I do agree it's not always useful to make 20-30 subcats for 100 Modernist buildings in Argentina. But there are solutions for it, for example making category called Modernist buildings in Argentina by name. E.g. Bridges in Japan has 13 primary metacats, as well as other metacats, but you can find all bridges in Bridges in Japan by name. --Orijentolog (talk) 09:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. This is getting too long for a sweet worry xD. Let's see if I understand: you say that there are disagreements about what the interiors are and yet you transfer everything to elements, fine. "An integral part of the structures that contain them – usually buildings" doesn't seem like an integral part is a separate element, but ok. Therefore, in architectural elements, ... and Not necessarily a building element seems contradictory since the two concepts (architecture and building) are mostly interchangeable. Better to leave it in the main category and not hide it in the element category, right?

And as for whether you or I agree on, it doesn't matter. It should matter to the casual visitor who isn't used to navigating through layers and layers of categories.

Returning to this topic, Argentina or Germany. Maybe Argentina lacks a bit of order and Germany has too much. For example Gothic buildings in Germany (and all countries) didn't exist until you created it, only six types of buildings that could be in the main category (as they were). Clearer and simpler. Gothic fortifications in Germany not necessary since it only has one possible subcategory (castles) that exists at the same time in Gothic buildings, a bit circular. In the end, what it's about is to save the visitor who can look for something here to get lost in avoidable categories. Regards Joanbanjo (talk) 00:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Economía de la provincia de Valencia

Hola, No considero redundante la cuestión de que la economía de valencia se categorice a la vez en las categorías de por ciudad de la comunidad autónoma y de por provincia. Son jerarquías diferentes. Me limito a trasladar a Valencia el esquema que se aplica al resto de provincias españolas. Tampoco entiendo por qué la categoría Economy of the province of Valencia deba redirigirse a Economy of the Land of Valencia. De hecho, hay mucho material repartido en la categoría Economy of the Land of Valencia que puede (y debe) categorizarse a la vez por provincias. Esta la pauta corriente en el resto de provincias. Saludos Zarateman (talk) 10:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola! No sé si redundante, pero bastante innecesaria sí. Tampoco es obligatorio trasladar el esquema del resto de provincias a esta o otra autonomia, que cierta estandarización va bien pero en general categorizar por autonomia ya sobra (depende de cual también). Lo de la redirección era para eliminarla y el material repartido dentro está bien repartido en la categorias concretas y no debe añadirsele otras por seguir determinada pauta porque sí. Por ejemplo la pesca esta dentro de economia, si hubiera foto correspondiente a x provincia seria totalmente excesivo añadirle economy of tal cunado ya tiene una categoria apropiada y ajustada. Y lo mismo con el resto de categorias, no solo con esta. Por poner otro ejemplo de arquitectura (que nos gusta a los dos) si una columna esta categorizada como romana en Extremadura seria totalmente forzado añadirle otra categoria por provincia, vamos. Un abrazo. Joanbanjo (talk) 02:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola de nuevo. En mi opinión, existiendo el material categorizable, es apropiado y conveniente reproducir en las categorías de Commons, al menos las más importantes, el esquema tradicional de Estado > subdivisión territorial de nivel 2 (regiones, estados federados, comunidades autónomas) > nivel 3 (provincias, departamentos, distritos, condados) > nivel 4 (ciudades) que se aplica al general de los países. Por una consistencia geográfica y también para facilitar a los usuarios la localización de contenidos. IMHO, no considero redundante o innecesario el hecho de que un mismo contenido sea accesible desde distintas vías porque cuelga de diferentes categorías aun tratándose del mismo concepto (divisiones territoriales). Es más, ello resulta útil, también porque además informa sobre geografía. Commons es el correlato gráfico de Wikipedia. Saludos Zarateman (talk) 18:55, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Holi again. Commons es el correlato gráfico de Wikipedia no, son dos proyectos diferentes, uno no sigue al otro. Que existan determinadas divisiones territoriales no implica (o no debería) que se refleje en una categoria. Crear categorias así da como resultado categorias cuasi vacias, artificiales y forzadas. Un ejemplo extremo seria este Statues of Saint John the Baptist in France by department, multitud de categorias con apenas contenido. Commons no está para informar de geografia y cuantas menos vías haya para acceder al contenido (y mas dirigidas) mejor, de lo contrario se podrian crear categorias ad infinutum. En general seria que a cada divisón administrativa sus categorias necesarias y no las que tengan todas por seguir un modelo uniforme. Mantenerlo simple y accesible. Saludos Joanbanjo (talk) 20:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Una cosa son las categorías ad infinitum o artificiales y otra la existencia de contenido obviamente categorizable. Si existe este, sobre todo si lo hay en abundancia, corresponde colocarlo bajo la categoría conceptual adecuada. Y cierta estandarización es también pertinente, porque hay que aportar claridad, orden y homogeneidad. Todos los proyectos de Wikimedia son divulgativos, culturales y educativos. Si no lo fueran, no tendría sentido su existencia. Pienso sobre todo en las categorías de nivel jerárquico elevado. Poco tiene que ver enredarse con desglosar estatuas de determinado santos por regiones y prestar atención a una categoría tan elevada como la economía, la cultura o el transporte. Cuando se trata de provincias, obviamente, unas tienen más contenido que otras. Pero con los años, ya todas presentan el suficiente contenido como para ofrecer una estructura similar, incluso homogénea, en una serie de categorías básicas, sin apenas excepciones. Si hay 45 o 47 provincias con la categoría "Economy of the province of" (una categoría de nivel alto) ya existente, toca crearla para las que faltan, ya que también hay, dentro de ellas, numeroso contenido que entra en ese concepto. Y Valencia, desde luego, más que la mayoría. Este es mi criterio. Saludos. Zarateman (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

También soy de la opinión de que Wikipedia o Commons no deben dar la impresión de que se da preeminencia a determinadas áreas geográficas a costa de otras. Hay territorios subestatales o localidades que están muy trabajadas en cuanto a la organización de sus contenidos, mientras que otros, incluso con mucho contenido también, están poco menos que medio abandonadas en cuanto al diseño de su estructura de categorías, anárquica o paupérrima en ocasiones. ¿El motivo? lo ignoro. Pero creo que debemos corregir esto. Zarateman (talk) 00:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

En añadidura, en relación con el ejemplo que ha puesto de las estatuas de San Juan Bautista en Francia por departamento, me gustaría pregutarle si no considera artificiosa o forzada la categoría Statues of Christian saints in the Land of Valencia y que cuelguen de ella 18 subcategorías. Saludos.Zarateman (talk) 00:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, muchas cosas. Empezando por el final, no, no lo considero artificioso: la mayoría tienen una cantidad moderada de fotos y además las que existen se corresponden más o menos con los santos típicos de la zona (por ser oriunndos o tener mas devoción , lo que sea). En cambio si que consideraria innecesario bajar un escalón más, sea provincia, comarca, city, etc. En general es eso, aquí por ejemplo en el nivel autonómico sobra y dividirlo en más capas (statues of saint fulano by province o virgin mary by city, etc) excesivo.

Que determinadas áreas geográficas esten mas trabajadas no va a costa de las demás. Sideterminadas regiones tengan más desarrollada su categorización pues puede que se deba a que haya alguien o algun grupo que se haya dedicado a subir contenido y organizarlo y en otras no, no hay más (algunos trabajan su ciudad, los trenes de su provincia, la flora de su barrio, etc, etc). Seria mi caso con lo que tengo más cerca, pero simepre prefiriendo una categorizació más laxa y flexible; en otros rincones que no controlo me abstengo de crear nada. Por eso no creo que se deba corregir nada con una anivelación des de arriba forzada y no atendiendo las necesidades específicas de cada sitio.

Es la misma idea todo el rato, donde parar de categorizar? En algunas autonomías más grandes no te digo que funcione pero no por eso se ha de extender a todas. En algunas funciona mejor del nivel autonomico hacia abajo y no con categorias laterales que no aportan aportar ni claridad ni orden dispersando el contenido (no sé, por ejemplo en Extremadura con sölo dos provincias se podrían evitar algunas vias de categorizar, pero no me meto). Si hay 45 o 47 provincias (creadas recientemente y contando doblemente con las comunidades que eran una provincia) con x categoría no toca crear nada por seguir la corriente, que exista una determinada división administrativa no obliga a representarla en una categoría, se puede escoger no hacerlo en pro de una mejor accesibilidad, si se pede evitar una categoria mejor. Bueno, un abrazo. Joanbanjo (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atenes i Museu de l'Acròpoli d'Atenes des de l'Acròpoli.JPG

File:Atenes i Museu de l'Acròpoli d'Atenes des de l'Acròpoli.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walter White al carrer d'Antoni Suárez, València.JPG

File:Walter White al carrer d'Antoni Suárez, València.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

MrNoobNub2 (talk) 19:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you paying attention to your edits?

In this edit, you claim "not overcat". And yet File:Trinity_Church_nyc.jpg is already in Category:Trinity Church (Manhattan) in 2018 which is a descendant category of Category:Trinity Church (Manhattan). -- DanielPenfield (talk) 04:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yes, categories by years are not substitutes for the "real thing", they are just a side category, so there is no overcat. --Joanbanjo (talk) 04:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a link that supports your claim? And do you intend to literally put every last one of the hundreds or thousands of Trinity Church images in the topmost category? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 04:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll answer you in a few hours, good night. --Joanbanjo (talk) 04:58, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Not a link, but it is a common practice, common sense. Look for example in the category Category:History of St. Paul's Cathedral, you have categories by years but always together with the category with meaning (there is no overcat). Or even in Trinity Church itself where the category Category:Interior of Trinity Church (Manhattan) (the important category) it goes with the year category together (no overcat again). And do you intend to literally put every last one of the hundreds or thousands of Trinity Church images in the topmost category? Yes why not. It wouldn't be a crime. It would be much better than searching for a photo among 24 (!) categories. There are not thousands of photos of the church, some are already correctly categorized in the interior category or the cemetery category. You could create an exterior category (I'm not a fan either) or even more precise and useful ones, like Trinity Church tower or spire, Trinity Church from Wall Street, etc. The important (descriptive) category and then if you want the year category, but not only that. Regards --Joanbanjo (talk) 18:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carrer de Pelai

Buenos días Joan. En OpenStreetMap sale que esta calle está en el distrito de Extramurs. No es así? Un saludo, tyk (talk) 09:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, sí, en ese distrito está. Pero es necesario la categorización solo con una o 4 calles? Me parece excesiva. Joanbanjo (talk) 09:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno estaba empezando, pero seguramente va a llevar bastante tiempo. Son muchas categorías. tyk (talk) 09:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No hacce falta, no son tantas categorías, de verdad, la mayorí se concentran el Ciutat Vella. Joanbanjo (talk) 09:27, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categorías

Buenas, Joanbanjo. Lo cierto es que no entiendo qué tiene de "excessive" darle una categoría a una calle... Un saludo: Alavense (talk) 06:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categorías

Oye, te recuerdo que eres tú el que has entrado como elefante en cacharrería revirtiendo sin ton ni son, sin dar ni un solo argumento. Córtate un poco, que no eres el propietario del cortijo, que siempre haces lo mismo. CFA1877 (talk) 22:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, no te equivoques. Yo no tengo que esperar a nada, eh, no tengo que esperar a que me des tu bendición para poder editar, como si Valencia fuera tu cortijo particular. CFA1877 (talk) 22:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola buenas noches. Perdón por la brusquedad y la rapidez, queria evitar más estropicio. No soy propietario de nada, correcto, pero creo que se que va mejor por aquí por decirlo así. Es mejor dejar dos niveles de categorización, si solo hay unas 20 cooperativas agrícolas debidamente categorizadas (gracias por crearla), mejor dejarla así que profundizar más, complicando la cosa. Joanbanjo (talk) 22:53, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Estropicio el que estás montando tú, acusándome de falta de civismo cuando eres tú el que has empezado a revertir sin dar siquiera argumentos. ¿Pero quién te crees que eres? Lo de eliminar siempre por todos los medios cualquier cosa relacionada con provincia de Valencia...eso es manía tuya y no hay por donde justificarla. CFA1877 (talk) 22:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, no es provincia o no, es el numero inecesario de categorias. Con unas pocas ya en la de agricultural ya está bien organizado, no hace falta más. Te aconsejoo que rebajes el tono, seamos civiles. Joanbanjo (talk) 22:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Esa es tu opinión personal, y tu opinión personal ni me la puedes imponer a mi ni a otras personas. Es completamente válido usar el nivel provincial como forma de categoría, y tú no tienes ninguna pregorrativa para ir siempre saboteando a conciencia eso. Ya me lo hiciste con las infraestructuras. Eso sí, tiene gracia que vengas a sabotear, revirtiendo sin ton ni son, y luego pidas civismo. Respeta un poco más a los demás. CFA1877 (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola de nuevo. Opinión personal? Puede que tenga preferencias, igual que tu, es irrelevante a la hora de categorizar. Crear categorias con pocos items es complicar demasiado el camino para acceder al contenido, nada más. Si ya existen categorias apropiadas al maximo, es poco util hacer de mas. Un saludo. Joanbanjo (talk) 23:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

¿Te importaría dejar parar de una vez? Pides civismo, pides hablar y al mismo tiempo sigues erre que erre. Pero de qué vas. CFA1877 (talk) 23:16, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, creo que te lo he explicado bien, no? Son totalmente innecesarias y complican demasiado la comprensión del arbol de categorias. Joanbanjo (talk) 23:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, no has explicado nada, aunque parece que crees que lo has hecho. No tienes potestad para hacer lo que estás haciendo, a ver si te enteras. CFA1877 (talk) 23:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Holaaaa, claro que tengo potestad. Si considero, y lo es, que la categorización que estas armando es poco util intento pararlo, y ya. Buenas noches. Joanbanjo (talk) 23:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ajam, ya veo. Que te crees de verdad que eres el amo del cortijo. CFA1877 (talk) 23:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Claro que no, en absoluto. Puede que sea cabezota, un poco. De verdad, no crees que está mejor sin tanta categoria, mas facil y accesible? Si ya está en agricultural a nivel autonómico (y no hay muchas que justifique profundizar mas) no tiene mucho sentido a hacerlo. No sé, creo que está claro. Un saludo. Joanbanjo (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, no está claro, solo has expresado tu parecer personal en breves palabras. No tiene sentido que una categoría regional/autonómica acoja el material de varias provincias cuando este es extenso. Si hubiera poco material, me parecería razonable dejarlo solo a nivel regional. Pero tal y como estaba, aparecía abigarrado y sin mucha organización. El nivel de organización básico debe ser el municipio, sobre todo en categorías que tengan un ámbito de actuación municipal. Si de una provincia existe un extenso material, debe aparecer con categoría propia. Se hace así en otros muchos casos, no es capricho mío. CFA1877 (talk) 23:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. no es opinión personal. Si lo es, tu manera de categorizar también lo seria. No hay material muy extenso, en absoluto. Mas aún cuando sigues dividiendolo en categorias mas pequeñas (poco utiles entonces). De cooperative a agricultural a winemaking, cada vez con menos. El deber de hacerlo así no lo marca nadie, cada caso es diferente, usar una categorización así de rígida es inecesario. Espero que lo comprendas. Un saludo. Joanbanjo (talk) 23:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

¿Podemos llegar entonces a un punto de entendimiento? CFA1877 (talk) 23:42, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, estaria bien, si. Que propones? Joanbanjo (talk) 23:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ya he señalado que la provincia es un nivel básico, que en caso de haber material gráfico de sobra debe considerarse como rango de categoría. Sin embargo, viendo que ya había una categorización previa comarcal (ajena a las cooperativas) que no he considerado debidamente, te ofrezco recuperar su incorporación allá donde estuviera. Como solución de compromiso entre las dos partes, para cerrar este desencuentro. CFA1877 (talk) 23:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Volvemos a lo mismo, cuanto es material de sobra, una, dos, tres categorias?. La provincia puede usarse o no para categorizar, no es obligatorio ni es util en todos los rincones. Si te preocupa el abigarramiento y la organización con las categorias que has creado específicas (agricultural y winemaking) y quitando el escalón provincial se quedarían un arbol de categorias bastante resultón. Que me dices? Por favor. Joanbanjo (talk) 00:08, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, vuelves tú a lo mismo, por qué insistes in prohibir usar la categoría provincial porque sí (que por supuesto que es útil y es necesaria, en tanto que sigue existiendo como unidad administrativa). Te he ofrecido una solución de compromiso, ¿la aceptas o no?. CFA1877 (talk) 00:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Donde está el compromiso? Que siga existiendo no implica usarla categorizando, es obvio. En cuanto a usar las comarcas (o otra subdivision) para cooperativas seria el mismo problema, disgregar cada vez mas el contenido. Yo propongo usar las categorias adecuadas (agricultural y la otra) que has creado (gracias) y así se queda bein organizado. Joanbanjo (talk) 00:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mucho texto para volver al mismo punto en torno al cual llevas dando vueltas todo el rato. No, lo referente a Valencia está bien categorizado en sus respectivas categorías provinciales, es también una categoría adecuada. CFA1877 (talk) 00:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. Son 3 lineas, no creo que cueste demasiado. Ya se que llevamos dando vueltas a lo mismo. Está bien categorizado o no, te digo que puede ser de otra manera y mucho más util. No pasa nada porque no sea asi. Un saludo. Joanbanjo (talk) 00:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reversiones

¿Vas a estar revirtiendo absolutamente todo lo que hago? CFA1877 (talk) 00:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, a mi no me gusta estar haciendo esto, claro que no. Preferiria estar perdiendo el tiempo en otra cosa. Además queda un poco arisco esto de deshacer. Bueno, ni tu eres el amo ni lo soy yo. Esto ya es cabezonería. Del compromiso que te he propuesto no dijiste nada, no se ha movido nada. Puedo proceder a organizar de otra manera? O no tengo permiso? Un saludo, de verdad. Joanbanjo (talk) 00:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tú no me ha propuesto ningún compromiso, estás emperrado en eliminar cualquier referencia de carácter provincial, y en un sabotaje continuo. CFA1877 (talk) 00:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, paremos un poco. Si que te lo propuse. Si la preocupación es la organiación no tiene sentido hacerlo así. Dejame organizarlo de otra manera y veras que queda bien. Además, para de crear categorias, son mas que suficientes, por favor. Saludos. Joanbanjo (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, no tienes palabra, estás actuando abiertamente a mala fe, revirtiendo sin ton ni son. CFA1877 (talk) 01:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, que quieres decir con eso? No es mala fe hombre, ya dije que no me gusta esto. Simplemente no se ha aclarado el tema. Dejemos las cosas mejor de lo que estaban. Y por favor antes de seguir hacia adelante creando y revirtiendo, hablémoslo. Saludos. Joanbanjo (talk) 01:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sabes perfectamente a lo que me refiero. Yo ya he puesto sobre la mesa mis cartas, eres tú el que te lo estás montando bastante mal. CFA1877 (talk) 01:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, no te entiendo. Simplemente las categorias estaria mejor de otra manera mas leíble, llevo diciendolo todo el rato. Si revierto es para que lo veas nada más. Bueno, que hacemos? Continuar y dejarlo así no veo que sea opción. Joanbanjo (talk) 01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sí, se va a quedar así, es totalmente válido. Y como veo el plan que te traes, te aviso: si vuelves a las andadas, lo volveré a leventar una y otra vez. Vete haciendo a la idea. CFA1877 (talk) 01:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, oye, te dihe que paremos un poco no? Se va a quedar así porque lo digas tu? Y sobre los edificios, no está organizado así. Paremos esto, por favor. Joanbanjo (talk) 01:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pero qué dices, si eres tú el que vas detrás mía persiguiéndome constantemente y revirtiendo todo lo que hago. Reviertes masivamente sin ton ni son, pero literalmente (1). Para tú, en todo caso. Déjame editar en paz, que no eres el dueño del cortijo, entérate de una pajolera vez. CFA1877 (talk) 01:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, las categorias de Venta del Moro son las correctas. Revierto por vandalismo. No voy detras por gusto obviamente. Aun queda aclarar lo de las cooperativas. Un saludo. Joanbanjo (talk) 01:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lo de las cooperativas sabes de sobra mi opinión. Y ya te he dejado bastante claro lo que ocurrirá si vuelves a revertir masivamente sin ton ni son. CFA1877 (talk) 01:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, buenas noches ya. Entonces se queda como lo has hecho tu? Nadie te puede proponer otra opción? Los edificios de venta del Moro tienen las categories que deben, aquí hay menos discusón. Saludos. Joanbanjo (talk) 01:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Se quedan así, en efecto. Tú no me has hecho ninguna propuesta, solo has expresado cuarenta mil veces tu deseo de eliminar todo rastro de la categorización provincial [porque te da urticaria o por razones políticas, qué se yo]. Veo que en los municipios valencianos existen categorías para la provincia a nivel comarcal, provincial, regional...incluso dos niveles de categorización provinciales. Curiosamente, en estos casos no has metido mano y te has dedicado a deshacer sin ton ni son las categorías redundantes. En fin, la coherencia de tus argumentos. Ah, y estás advertido, si vuelves a revertir masivamente lo de la cooperativas, ya sabes lo que hay. Dedícate a cosas más productivas. CFA1877 (talk) 01:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Holaa. Te hice una propuesta bastante clara. Que razones tienes tu aparte de porque si, porque existe y se ha de hacer así? Los niveles de categorización valencianos tiene años ya (que da igual) y funcionan bien a distintos niveles. Pero siempre estoy abierto a cambios utiles. También te puedes dedicar a cosas mas productivas por Andalucía, por ejemplo. Y otra cosa, no me gusta estar discutiendo por esto, un abrazo. Joanbanjo (talk) 01:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No voy a repetir mis argumentos, te los he dado ya [varias veces], es inaudito que a estas alturas sigas sin enterarte de lo que te he dicho. Si quieres que me dedique a cosas más productivas por el sur, deja en paz los cambios que he hecho hoy en las cooperativas. ¿O vas a seguir erre que erre? CFA1877 (talk) 01:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. También te he dado los míos, parece que hagas oídos sordos. Lo de decirte de dedicarte a otras cosas ha sido un poco idiota de mi parte, lo siento. De verdad no crees que otro tipo quedaría mejor? Bueno, creo que se cual será la respuesta. No nos vamos a poner de acuerdo. Y si voy a seguir errere que erre, pues será que vo detras de otro que también va así. Dicho sin ánimos de ofender. Un saludo. Joanbanjo (talk) 02:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Esa sobrada que has soltado te describe muy bien. No hago oídos sordos, es que no has ofrecido nada tangenciable. Simplemente, que acepte tu santa voluntad de hacer lo que te de la gana. Y encima me lo dices en la cara, bastante sobrado también, que vas a seguir erre que erre. Mucho texto y mucho rollo para volver a decirme por enésima lo que es evidente desde el minuto, que aquí se hace lo que a ti te da la gana. CFA1877 (talk) 02:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola. La sobrada ha sido en respuesta a esto tuyo ''Dedícate a cosas más productivas''. Te he ofrecido organizar la cooperativas de otra forma, con categorias creadas por ti. Y ni caso. Estamos dando vueltas a lo mismo, con mucho o poco texto. Te digo que no se hace lo que me da la gana, faltaria. Entre las categorias que has creado tu para organizarlas ya se quedaria bien, seria entre los dos, no veo el problema. Lo erre que erre aplicaría a los dos, parece que igual de cabezotas. Un saludo. Joanbanjo (talk) 02:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, ''Dedícate a cosas más productivas. CFA1877 (Discussió) 01:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)'' y También te puedes dedicar a cosas mas productivas por Andalucía, por ejemplo. Y otra cosa, no me gusta estar discutiendo por esto, un abrazo. Joanbanjo (Discussió) 01:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC), creo que una va delante y otra después. Pero eso da igual, ya te dije que mi comentario no era apropiado, Una cosa moderate con las calificaciones, que a mi me dan igual, pero por aquí son bastante quisquillosos con eso, aconsejo que borres. Un saludo. Joanbanjo (talk) 02:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hala, ahora amenazando. Bueno, lo dejo aquí, porque total... CFA1877 (talk) 02:39, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, no te amenazado, te lo he dicho por tu bien, de todas maneras queda en el historial. A mí me da igual, no va a ir a ningún sitio. Ni Extremadura ni Andalucía me dan urticaria ;). he categorizado bastantes cosas por allí (no he creado categorias tho). Supongo que vemos las cosas diferente, a ti te gusta hacer cuantas más categorías mejor, yo prefiero una categorización más laxa. En fin, no nos tomemos esto muy a pecho. Un saludo y buenas noches. Joanbanjo (talk) 02:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing categories

Why do you keep removing categories from File:V-1 Flying Bomb on launch pad.jpg with no explanation? Dubidubno (talk) 23:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the photos. See [Commons:Categories#For more appropriate categorization For more appropiate categorization]. So yout photos beleng to the category Category:V-1 Launch ramp at Imperial War Museum Duxford I think, and this category is inside Military equipment in the Imperial War Museum Duxford which is inside (a subcategory) of Collections of the Imperial War Museum Duxford wich is a subcategory of the main Category:Imperial War Museum Duxford and so on. Cheers Joanbanjo (talk) 23:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And [9]: looks to me like there are two rocking chairs relatively prominently at right. - Jmabel ! talk 00:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Honestly I think they are barely visible, in a corner and are not the subject of the photo, they only appear incidentally. There are also "visible" windows and they are not categorized. Regards Joanbanjo (talk) 00:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Windows? Sure, there are windows in millions of photos. Rocking chairs, rather rarer. - Jmabel ! talk 05:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Immaculate, Rathmines

Why did you remove the dome category please? Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I removed the category because you add the category where you can see that there is a dome (as I have done here [10]) not to the whole category of the building. Greetings Joanbanjo (talk) 21:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Com:Duplicate

Hi. Noting the policy talks about exact duplicates and then explains what it is. Colour differences do not fall under the exact criteria. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

**2022 Picture of the Year**: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]