Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
![45 File:"EUSSR" flag.svg](#File:"EUSSR"_flag.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_東北学院大学_仙台市.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![202 File:Perspective alignée et de niveau de "l'Hommage aux artistes peintres venus à Céret".jpg](#File:Perspective_alignée_et_de_niveau_de_"l'Hommage_aux_artistes_peintres_venus_à_Céret".jpg){kind=link}
![213 File:USSR poster "For the Motherland!".jpg](#File:USSR_poster_"For_the_Motherland!".jpg){kind=link}
Because it is Logo Fatimah Goldhirsch (talk) 22:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 02:50, 27 September 2021 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 08:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
This poor man’s leg is missing 72.189.178.93 00:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 18:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
this is a photo of a photo that is widely used (and within copyright unless released by the real photographer), one use is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ietCF1XAVyQ Flickr account doesn't own the original image, clearly —SpacemanSpiff 19:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
- Relax. I have requested speedy deletion. I can't be held responsible for a Flickr fraud.— Vaibhavafro 💬 03:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied previously. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that the blog author is the photographer at the blog site C.Fred (talk) 02:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
User forged the review and the source video at youtube is not freely licensed. Eatcha (talk) 05:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
fantasy party names, probably fake diagram ; out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Không dùng tới Buivanthanh2003 (talk) 07:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a publicity still for the 2016 movie en:Camp Sawi. A similar photo can be seen here indicating it to be a publicity photo. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 08:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
It is no more required to be here Kaisar2030 (talk) 14:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Unattributed copyright violation of Domenjod's CC4.0 work File:GIGN27 Domenjod 140618.jpg, very unconvincingly claiming it is in the "public domain" now for some reason. Domenjod compained at COM:AN, I'm opening this DR to leave a record of why file deleted. File already removed and replaced at wikis it was in use at. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 15:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Spam gambling (togel) Tukang Patrol (talk) 15:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious gambling spam. --Achim (talk) 20:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Because its no academic Trianon2718 (talk) 17:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Dubious cc-by-sa-4.0 license, without evidence. +mt 00:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BriefEdits as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Per COM:TOYS. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete: Toy figurine of a comic book character owned by Marvel Studios. Per COM:TOYS. — BriefEdits (talk) 01:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW by Flickr user. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BriefEdits as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posters not covered by COM:FOP Hong Kong. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Reproduction of copyrighted marketing materials by Marvel Studioes which is derivative. Also not marginal enough to qualify for de minimis. — BriefEdits (talk) 01:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
google maps screenshot; copyvio Enyavar (talk) 16:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of Google Maps - copyvio Enyavar (talk) 16:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
google maps screenshot; copyvio. Enyavar (talk) 16:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Apparently a Google Maps Screensjot; Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:27, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation per Commons:Screenshots —MdsShakil (talk) 17:27, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Own work to be doubted, cropped from facebook. Achim (talk) 17:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
copy https://www.google.com/search?sa=G&hl=pt_BR&tbs=simg:CAQSmgIJ4dEFFmLvDukajgILEKjU2AQaAghCDAsQsIynCBo6CjgIBBIU9Bf7JagUkDioKogQ2xGKHosvoSIaGtw4U3Xnn9Yts4omd0qfyTUr9NaQmiz1Ddf4IAUwBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBHwWFwkMCxCd7cEJGqMBChwKCWdlbnRsZW1hbtqliPYDCwoJL20vMDE5cDVxCiYKE3doaXRlLWNvbGxhciB3b3JrZXLapYj2AwsKCS9tLzAxa3EzeAocCglmb3IgYWR1bHTapYj2AwsKCS9hLzkzY3dfeQoaCgdmb3IgbWVu2qWI9gMLCgkvYS81NnpmY3IKIQoOYnVzaW5lc3NwZXJzb27apYj2AwsKCS9tLzAxMnRfegw&q=gentleman&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwi3_LKH2Z_zAhXDGbkGHY9TAOUQwg4oAHoECAEQMg&biw=1360&bih=625&dpr=1 Sérgio Castelar (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Fraudulent claims, false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Bugsinmyfood (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW, OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful CC license - w:File:Flying Dragon for N64, Front Cover.jpg is non-free video game boxart. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted CV -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
google maps screenshot - copyvio Enyavar (talk) 21:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
google maps screenshot, copyvio Enyavar (talk) 21:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
google maps screenshot - copyvio. Please consider using openstreetmap as background Enyavar (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
copyvio of https://m.facebook.com/girishmahajanofficial/photos/a.253496981486323/290240541145300 GreaterPonce665 (talk) 16:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 19:49, 27 September 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Shizhao at 01:59, 28 September 2021 UTC: No license since 2021-09-27. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about Internet images. --Krdbot 08:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, UI elements owned by Apple for iOS ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 10:09, 28 September 2021 UTC: Screenshot of non-free content (F3) --Krdbot 14:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 04:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep Just like almost every other fantasy flag deletion, this claim comes without merit. The project scope does not exclude depictions of fantasy, and the nominator has not clearly articulated a reason why this file falls out of the project scope (citing several policies without explanation is not a reason). This flag, in fact, is not just the random creation of some user but represents a fictional country that appears in a notable work of fiction: The Princess Diaries. The flag therefore has illustrative value to depict the fictional country of Genovia and it is in use on several projects fulfilling this exact goal. Mysterymanblue 07:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. I've seen the film this flag is from, it's an accurate depiction. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 04:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Just like almost every other fantasy flag deletion, this claim comes without merit. The project scope does not exclude depictions of fantasy, and the nominator has not clearly articulated a reason why this file falls out of the project scope (citing several policies is not a reason). This flag, in fact, is not just the random creation of some user but an image asset from ARMA 3, a notable video game, and therefore has potential illustrative value for articles about that game. Mysterymanblue 07:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
This image was nominated for deletion a while ago since it's fictious. Although it was kept. Presumably because it was in use at the time. That doesn't seem to be the case now though. So the image should be deleted as OOS since it clearly lacks any kind of educational value. Adamant1 (talk) 04:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete SVG available. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 04:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 15:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Flag of a Hoax Nation and it is an Flag of an Nonexistent Country and Violations of COM:SELFIE, COM:EV, and COM:NOTHOST. ThomasFan707 (talk) 04:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE. The nominator is clearly overzealous in his deletion nominations and should reread the whole policy they are quoting. χ (talk) 06:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Just like almost every other fantasy flag deletion, this claim comes without merit. The project scope does not exclude depictions of fantasy, and the nominator has not clearly articulated a reason why this file falls out of the project scope (citing several policies without explanation is not a reason). Indeed, the file is not just some random user's creation, but is the flag of a fictional country from a notable work of fiction: The Adventures of Tintin. The flag has illustrative value in depicting the fictional nation in coverage of Tintin and is being used to that end on several projects. Mysterymanblue 11:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 04:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Just like almost every other fantasy flag deletion, this claim comes without merit. The project scope does not exclude depictions of fantasy, and the nominator has not clearly articulated a reason why this file falls out of the project scope (citing several policies without explanation is not a reason). Indeed, the file is not just some random user's creation, but is the flag of a fictional party from a notable work of fiction: Nineteen Eighty-Four. The flag has illustrative value in depicting the fictional party in coverage of Nineteen Eighty-Four and is being used to that end on several projects. Mysterymanblue 11:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, is this even a serious nomination? this is a VERY common design. It's from the book "1984" and I have seen this flag many times in reference to this book. "Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host"." This doesn't even describe anything with this flag, probably look something up before nominating it for deletion, once something is deleted it is lost forever. This flag has been used in a lot of media related to 1984. In fact, trying to have this flag deleted using newspeak and new definitions for words is exactly how the depicted political party operates. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep obviously spurious request. GPinkerton (talk) 08:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Recreation of a flag from a copyrighted movie, too complex to be not copyrightable, hence - a likely copyvio. Ps. This problem also affects File:Ingsoc logo from 1984.svg and File:INGSOC logo.png, but I am not sure how to include them in this Afd. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment, please see: "Commons:Deletion requests/File:INGSOC logo.png" & "Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ingsoc logo from 1984.svg". Note that this flag is based on a free logo, so it's likely not a copyright violation, or if it is not one of an unfree license.--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. This is not an original creation simply inspired by the book by Orwell, but rather is specifically reproducing the logo depicted in the 1984 British film, created for that film. Relevant: COM:TOO UK -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Exact duplication of File:Flag of the region Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes.svg: The Lion and the Dolphin is in the Down of the Flag and the Flag of Auvergne and Savoy is in the Top. ThomasFan707 (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 10:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Just like almost every other fantasy flag deletion, this claim comes without merit. The project scope does not exclude depictions of fantasy, and the nominator has not clearly articulated a reason why this file falls out of the project scope (linking to several, tenuously related policies without explanation is not a valid or compelling reason). This flag, in fact, is not just the random creation of some user but an image asset from ARMA 3, a notable video game, and therefore has potential illustrative value for articles about that game. Indeed, the file is in use for just that purpose, and it should not be deleted. Mysterymanblue 10:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted: The image was subsequently deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of fictional countries. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 10:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 10:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - this file is a useful depiction of the flag of Gondor, and as such is in use on English, Czech, Spanish, French, Italian, Norwegian, Polish, Slovak and Ukrainian Wikipedias. In no way is the image a COM:NOTHOST-style vanity project of one editor, but as the policy requires it is "realistically useful for an educational purpose", in this case explaining what Tolkien meant when he described Aragorn's kingly standard on the Field of Cormallen; the image easily meets the requirement of COM:SELFIE/COM:EV (they're the same thing) of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative".
- If I may speak for all of us for a moment, we WikiProject Middle-earth editors have made use of a wide range of materials on Commons, and added to them when we felt that materials were required. On English Wikipedia, the image actually heads up the article in the infobox, and its caption is cited to Tolkien's Return of the King, book 6, ch. 4 "The Field of Cormallen", quoting his description: "a great standard was spread in the breeze, and there a white tree flowered upon a sable field beneath a shining crown and seven glittering stars". It can be seen that the file accurately represents Tolkien's intention, as its use on so many Wikipedias should amply demonstrate. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 10:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 11:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". ThomasFan707 (talk) 12:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per "COM:INUSE", the Wikimedia Commons is not an arbiter of truth and this user registered 6 (six) days ago, their user page reads "Hello There, Thomas the Tank Engine is the Best." And almost all of their edits include proposing the deletion of flags with the same summary. A careless admin would delete this and unfortunately we have too many careless admins "helping out" with DR's, so I propose closing this request as invalid and possible vandalism. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 13:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 15:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
It's his profile pic for the Washington Post. Almost certainly not own work or CC. Sumanuil (talk) 04:29, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: Pavin is known for making references to the show Absolutely Fabulous. If he is indeed the uploader this needs to be declared and verified. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedily deleted as copyvio by Túrelio. (non-admin closure) --Paul_012 (talk) 21:45, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Kein Grund für Gemeinfreiheit erkennbar Ralf Roletschek 08:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (speedy). Ruthven (msg) 14:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
from https://twitter.com/roynemer/status/1433033050355552261?lang=en Eatcha (talk) 06:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational use. --ghouston (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational use. --ghouston (talk) 07:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder noted in the metadata; need their permission to license the file. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Inge van Grinsven
[edit]Claimed as own work but likely from the same set as https://www.ingevangrinsven.com/en/fotos/ and probably taken from here - https://www.facebook.com/ingevgrinsven/photos/a.775754665952922/1605722516289462 - found in Feb, before upload
Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Josefranarq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Author Howard Chan per exif, unlikely to be own work, needs OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal pic of non-notable people, unused since six years. Fl.schmitt (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Copyright holder tomasz rogala and Aleksandra Kielichowska per exif. Needs OTRS
- File:Magia 3.jpg
- File:Magia 2.jpg
- File:Instrumenty 3.jpg
- File:Instrumenty 2.jpg
- File:Instrumenty 1.jpg
- File:Magia 1.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nittruzrupttor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from https://jucamaximo.com.br - I can't find a cc license on the site
- File:Juca maximo absence2.jpg
- File:Juca maximo absence1.jpg
- File:Juca maximo gravity 3.jpg
- File:Juca-maximo-divisory-jmax5 copy.jpg
- File:Juca maximo absences lightyourself copy.jpg
- File:Juca maximo touch installation.jpg
- File:Portrait colors vii juca maximo.jpg
- File:Juca maximo portrait colors 2 copy.jpg
- File:Juca maximo portrait colors 3 copy.jpg
- File:Juca maximo portrait colors 1 copy.jpg
- File:Intense I juca maximo.jpg
- File:Writer your story juca maximo.jpg
- File:Writer-your-story2-juca-maximo copy.jpg
- File:Gravity VII by Juca Máximo.jpg
- File:Gravity II by Juca Máximo.jpg
- File:Gravity I by Juca Máximo.jpg
- File:Absence III by Juca Máximo.jpg
- File:Connection Installation by Juca Máximo 4.png
- File:Connection Installation by Juca Máximo 3.png
- File:Connection Installation by Juca Máximo.png
- File:Juca Máximo Connection Installation .png
- File:Juca-maximo-connection.png
- File:Juca Máximo em Chicago.jpg
- File:Juca Máximo em Taiwan em 2019.jpg
- File:Juca maximo perfil.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio Dronebogus (talk) 10:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
I assume this photo is copyrighted, © GeoPro, 2021, все права защищены Drakosh (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Other 隐世高人 (talk) 00:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Other 隐世高人 (talk) 00:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
File:HK TWD Tsuen Wan Plaza 荃灣廣場 mall 百老匯院線 Broadway Cinema current films July 2021 SS2 01.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by BriefEdits as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posters not covered by COM:FOP Hong Kong. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Reproduction of copyrighted marketing materials by various film companies, which is derivative. Also not marginal enough to qualify for de minimis. — BriefEdits (talk) 01:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
The background likely puts this above the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pevnotios2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Based on the watermark, all taken from the company website so not own work as claimed. PCP for others
- File:Inspiration Wall Decoration and Accessories.jpg
- File:Lighting Units By Inspiration.jpg
- File:Living Room Furniture By Inspiration.jpg
- File:Bedroom Furniture By Inspiration.jpg
- File:Dining Room Furniture.jpg
- File:Almanara.jpg
- File:Reception Furniture By Inspiration.jpg
- File:Almanara 3.jpg
- File:Almanara Lighting Project Hall 2.jpg
- File:Almanara Lighting Project.jpg
- File:Al Manara Project.webp
- File:Inspiration Showroom.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aloksinghofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Based on the watermark, taken from a product website. PCP. Def not own work
- File:OAKSMITH – FROM BEAM SUNTORY.png
- File:CONTACT OAKSMITH GOLD INDIA.png
- File:CONTACT OAKSMITH GOLD.png
- File:CONTACT OAKSMITH.png
- File:Oaksmith Whisky.png
- File:Oaksmith Craft.png
- File:Oaksmith Japan.png
- File:Oaksmith Premium.png
- File:Drink Smart.jpg
- File:OAKSMITH INTERNATIONAL Whisky.jpg
- File:OAKSMITH INTERNATIONAL.jpg
- File:OAKSMITH GOLD INSPIRED BY ASSAM, INDIA.jpg
- File:OAKSMITH GOLD INSPIRED BY GOA, INDIA.jpg
- File:OAKSMITH GOLD INSPIRED BY KOLKATA, INDIA.jpg
- File:INSPIRED COCKTAILS COLLECTION.jpg
- File:JAPANESE TAKUMI RITUAL.jpg
- File:Oaksmith.jpg
- File:Oaksmith Gold.jpg
- File:Oaksmith Gold Whisky.jpg
- File:INSPIRED BY JAPANESE ‘GEMBA’.png
- File:THE PERFECT SERVE.png
- File:UNIQUE & RARE.png
- File:RARE CRAFTSMANSHIP OF JAPAN.png
- File:The world class blend of Oaksmith® Gold.png
- File:Oaksmith.png
- File:Oaksmith Gold Whisky.png
- File:Oaksmith Gold.png
Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrew Tupalev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most taken from https://tatintsian.com/exhibitions and the others are unlikely to be own work. All need permission from artists as there is no FOP for artwork in Russia
- File:Installation shot - Damien Hirst.jpg
- File:Installation shot - Chuck Close.jpg
- File:Installation shot - Mat Collishaw.jpg
- File:Installation shot - Wim Delvoye.jpg
- File:Installation shot - Ron Arad.jpg
- File:Evgeny Chubarov - Untitled Work.jpg
- File:Evgeny Chubarov - Monument to Victims of Soviet-Era Prison Camps.jpg
- File:Evgeny Chubarov - Untitled.jpg
- File:Evgeny Chubarov - Drawing.jpg
- File:Evgeny Chubarov - Drawings.jpg
- File:Evgeny Chubarov - Personal exhibition at Osthaus Museum Hagen.jpg
- File:Evgeny Chubarov in studio.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused diagram, useless without context. Fl.schmitt (talk) 10:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Blatant spam/promotion, no educational purpose Tukang Patrol (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. id:Pengguna:Promo Karoseri has been deleted. --Achim (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope -Killarnee (C•T•U) 13:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Blurred and unused. Lots of better pictures available in Category:Picus viridis. Zinnmann (talk) 13:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader's response:
Speedy delete Mistakenly uploaded jpg file. Video file newly uploaded at File:Juvenile Green Woodpecker digging for ants. Picus viridis video.webm. Thanks —Vis M (talk) 14:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 15:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 14:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 15:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Google maps screenshot; copyvio Enyavar (talk) 15:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 14:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 14:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 14:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 14:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Dear Krd, I guess you would delete the photo, but it is still present in Commons. Would you please finish this deletion request? --JopkeB (talk) 03:32, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 15:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 16:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 14:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 15:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 15:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sumaia Islam Shimu (talk · contribs)
[edit]CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
JopkeB (talk) 15:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Dewfall Donna Alvita
[edit]Out of scope - how are these files realistically useful for educational purposes?
- File:Dewfall a.jpg
- File:Dewfall 217.jpg
- File:Dewfall 157.jpg
- File:Dewfall 144.jpg
- File:Dewfall 191.jpg
- File:Dewfall 147.jpg
- File:Dewfall 146.jpg
- File:Dewfall 203.jpg
- File:Dewfall 194.jpg
- File:Dewfall 148.jpg
- File:Dewfall 202.jpg
- File:Dewfall 204.jpg
- File:Dewfall 201.jpg
- File:Dewfall 199.jpg
- File:Dewfall 158.jpg
- File:Dewfall 130.jpg
- File:Dewfall 145.jpg
- File:Dewfall 141.jpg
- File:Dewfall 197.jpg
- File:Dewfall 196.jpg
- File:Dewfall 212.jpg
- File:Dewfall 142.jpg
- File:Dewfall 132.jpg
- File:Dewfall 131.jpg
- File:Dewfall 206.jpg
- File:Continued dewfall.jpg
- File:Dewfall 143 continued.jpg
- File:Dewfall 200.jpg
- File:Dewfall156.jpg
- File:Dewfall 218.jpg
- File:Dewfall222.jpg
- File:Dewfall 161.jpg
- File:Dewfall 216.jpg
- File:Dewfall 198.jpg
- File:Dewfall 134.jpg
- File:Dewfall 143.jpg
- File:Dewfall 195.jpg
- File:Dewfall 159c.jpg
- File:Dewfall 160.jpg
- File:Dewfall 159.jpg
- File:Dewfall 192.jpg
- File:Dewfall 160 b.jpg
- File:Dewfall 146 continued.jpg
- File:Dewfall 160 contd.jpg
- File:Dewfall 131 contd.jpg
- File:Dewfall 145 contd.jpg
- File:Dewfall 146 contd.jpg
- File:Dewfall 161 contd.jpg
- File:Dewfall 135 contd.jpg
- File:Dewfall 147 contd.jpg
- File:Dewfall 148 contd.jpg
- File:Dewfall 135 continued.jpg
- File:Dewfall 161 continued.jpg
- File:Dewfall 141continued.jpg
- File:Dewfall 207 & 208.jpg
- File:Dewfall 158 contd.jpg
- File:Dewfall 144b.jpg
- File:Dewfall 209,210,211.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 15:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
The author does not own the right to the blog. copyvio Trade (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
The screenshot is de minimis and has not violated any copyright violation. It blurred any possible copyrightable material and what is left are tiny chunks of text that are mere summaries which are ideas and not sufficient for copyright. It is uploaded as a proof of a defunct website's existence in the past, and for the purpose of as an example of an islamophobe website which by U.S. Copyright law is considered Fair use. The "logo" of the website has no artistic expressions as well because it is merely a text with a generic serif font. Salim McDoom (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Adding
- Delete I don't see any educational purpose to a heavily redacted image of low quality, that is copyright problematic. — billinghurst sDrewth
Adding
We still don't have an clear answer as to whether or not the author actually took these similar pictures himself. --Trade (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi. The burden of proof is always on the accuser. Until you can prove that there is an actual copyright violation here, you have no right to nominate a deletion under copyright violations on any of my uploads. I have already rebuffed your first claim and you have not responded with a substantial counterargument to push for the deletion. I deem this nomination as maliciously motivated as well. I checked your uploads and there are lots of anti-Muslim media in there, specifically the "say no to burqas" images. I deem these unfounded copyright claims as motivated by political beliefs, specifically anti-islam wikipedia editors trying to clean up media that tackle the subject of anti-islam beliefs. I question the neutrality of the aiding administrator as well. I request arbitration from another wikimedia editor who is neutral on subject of politics particularly someone who is neither anti-islam, anti-muslim nor downright neo-nazi islamophobe white supremacist.
To add more context, the original file in question depicts an example of a neo-nazi anti-muslim website that contains the "True ruler quote" by neo-nazi leader Kevin Alfred Strom. It has been used as a motto or slogan by various neo-nazi anti-muslim websites as well, so producing media to depict that is of educational value for topics of organized discrimination. In regards to its copyright, again, the screenshot contains only generic typography and the texts are considered short quotations (which cannot be copyrighted).
The other photos are irrelevant to this nomination and if you want to nominate those for deletion for the reason of copyright violation please provide proof that you own the copyright or provide evidences that it has been copyrighted by someone else. If you cannot do that then please stop maliciously tagging my uploads for unfounded copyright claims because I deem those as personal attacks motivated by a clear conflict of religious belief differences. Salim McDoom (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: Response to the request of arbitration? --Trade (talk) 22:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- There is no need for arbitration in the argument over the retention of image(s) where it is about copyright and fair use. That argument stands on its own right here.
There is not a formal arbitration policy at Commons. If there are concerns that the two users are unable to work out about their interactions, then they probably need to review Commons:Dispute resolution and drop a note at Com:Administrators' noticeboard and seek advice. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- There is no need for arbitration in the argument over the retention of image(s) where it is about copyright and fair use. That argument stands on its own right here.
Comment Fair use is not a pertinent argument to be used at Commons for uploading and retention at Commons.
Please read Com:DR about the process the community uses where there are concerns about images, and the basis for arguing whether an image should be kept or should be deleted. This will help the administrator reviewing the nomination to make a decision against our scope.
Please do not default to throwing in this is a religious issue, that will not win the argument. This is not about the nominator, and their motivation; this is not about the uploader, nor their motivation; this is about demonstrating that the image is within scope for Commons. If you want to claim fair use, then it should be uploaded at the local wiki under their local policies, they cannot be hosted at Commons. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
The Fair Use part is in defense of the first photo claimed. The de minimis defense has been sustained. And your claim that it is "derived from other photograph" is baseless because I created the screenshot myself. If you have evidence that it is not my own creation, prove it. Show me any proof, any link that it has been created by anyone else. As for its elements I have also proven that none of its components are copyrighted. Excerpts and quotes are mere ideas and cannot be copyrighted. The header of the blog has no artistic expressions it cannot be copyrighted nor trademarked. I have also defended its educational purposes and the main reason it was uploaded in the first place.
Now for the other photos your claim that they are derived from other photos is also baseless. And being the accuser you must have a proof beforehand that they are "derivative of other photos." Provide link and evidence for that claim. I am not obliged to do so, otherwise anyone can also go around making baseless copyvio claims on anyone's upload, and if they were not that active on Wikimedia the photo gets deleted because they are not there to discuss and prove that they own it? Stupid act. All DMCA claims must provide sufficient proofs of ownership before it can be honored. You are not even owners of these photos. So why are you invested in taking it down? Of course, the motivation here is questionable. You have been taking down articles and pages across Wikimedia projects where these photos have been used, just to satisfy your claim that they have no educational purpose as a backup plan to your baseless copyvio claims.
So once again, if you cannot prove that there is a copyvio on any of these photos, so why initiate it in the first place? Pretending not to be politically motivated in doing so is being dishonest and abusive. This is pure harassment.
What you need to provide:
- Proof that the first image is copyrighted, and its elements are copyrighted.
- Proof that the other 3 photos are derivatives.
- If you are unhappy about how me or Billinghurst are handling this and want a second opinion from an another administrator you need to post your request at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. Nobody are going to see your complaint here. @Salim McDoom: --Trade (talk) 14:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- No but i would be happy if you removed your threat of reporting me to the authorities. This is not okay. @Salim McDoom: --Trade (talk) 16:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 14:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work , Logo held by "Warner Bros./Adult Swim" ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Math equation, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. Only use on 1 dormant sandbox page. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
L'ho caricata per errore Maresca Salvatore (talk) 19:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
L'ho caricata per errore Maresca Salvatore (talk) 19:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
L'ho caricata per errore Maresca Salvatore (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
This doesn't appear to be the official logo anymore (link, is hosted at en:File:Torch_Network.png as fair use) and either version of the logo might fulfill COM:TOO per the Prince logo precedent Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nintendofan885 as Copyvio (Copyvio) King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Krd 14:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Picture quality is not good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdf990 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - File is INUSE however it can easily be replaced by a higher resolution file - something this file isn't. –Davey2010Talk 01:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep File is in use. Picture quality is perfectly adequate. Pack My Box (talk) 04:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 19:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality image - We have plenty of better higher quality images at Category:Cock rings and Category:Close-up photographs of human penises, Since the last DR the file has been replaced so is no longer in use, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The file is in use on a Wikipedia. To quote {{COM:INUSE]] "Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough. " Pack My Box (talk) 03:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- "Since the last DR the file has been replaced so is no longer in use". Also as stated we have plenty of better images of cock rings and close ups. –Davey2010Talk 12:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- You removed the image yourself. I have reported your action. Pack My Box (talk) 03:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think it is low enough quality to be deleted. Certainly if it were not a sexual image, it is unlikely anyone would even consider deleting it on that basis. - Jmabel ! talk 06:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Jmabel I nominate poor quality images all the time and the subject of the image is irrelevant to me - We're Commons so we should host all sorts of images and as I said this purely based on the quality of the image, not on what the image is, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PENIS and COM:WEBHOST - the file is no longer INUSE and all this user has done is upload 2 photos of his penis to Commons - they aren't here to positively contribute. Adding it to pages to make it INUSE is a dodge Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete We have no real use of the picture --Trade (talk) 16:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Krd had today closed the DR as keep citing the file being inuse however unfortunately PMB has taken it upon themselves to spam the file everywhere, IMHO my arguement and those above should be judged instead of it being judged purely on inuse (I'm aware inuse always takes precedence), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- PMB has been inserting this in multiple articles and has been edit warring on them so INUSE should be ignored - The file was only ever used in one article (Penis ve testis işkencesi) prior to nomination and I had replaced the file multiple times since but as I say PMB keeps edit warring, Once this DR is closed I'll reinstate the replacement image on all affected articles, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Not in use at this moment. --Ellywa (talk) 22:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF80:F301:ED70:9A62:5AFE:440B 22:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Images labeled as by the photojournalist ED KASHI and uploaded from a newsite -- no evidence that the author has licensed the content under creative commons. Sadads (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Douglas, Wyoming
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama for sculptures in the United States and this statue seem pretty modern, so it’s certainly copyrighted.
- File:Douglas, Wyoming Jackalope Square.jpg
- File:Jackalope 2017-09-28 1559.jpg
- File:Jackalope head , Douglas, Wyoming 08.jpg
- File:Jackalope Square, Douglas, Wyoming 10.jpg
- File:Jackalope square, Douglas, Wyoming 12.jpg
- File:Jackalope Square, Douglas, Wyoming 17.jpg
- File:Jackalope, Douglas, Wyoming 06.jpg
- File:Jackalope, Douglas, Wyoming 07.jpg
- File:Jacolope Square in Douglas, WY - panoramio.jpg
User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 22:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like it was dedicated in 1990 [1]. The creator appears unknown. Since public display of a work doesn't count for publication in the US (at least, not since 1977; see COM:PACUSA), the sculpture likely won't be public domain until 2111 (120 years after creation, per COM:HIRTLE). Then again, if copies of the statue are sold as souvenirs (seems likely, given Douglas County's claim to be the home of the jackalope), that would count as publication, making the public domain date as soon as 2086 (publication + 95 years). If we knew who the creator was, it would become public domain 70 years after their death, which could conceivably be 2061, at the earliest. In any case, photos of this work won't be okay on Commons for a very long time unless permission from the rightsholder is obtained. clpo13(talk) 23:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Given that it’s the most prominent landmark in Douglas, Wyoming and the big thing the town is famous for, I would think that at least the images that show either partial elements or show it in context with surrounding buildings can stay. Montanabw (talk) 02:08, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Uncontextualized picture of trees and sky, without educational value, and brand mark which suggests it was not created by the original creator Sadads (talk) 22:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Fatimah Goldhirsch (talk) 11:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination OOS. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF80:F301:ED70:9A62:5AFE:440B 21:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF80:F301:ED70:9A62:5AFE:440B 21:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heoconbula (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivatives false claimed to be own work, no data of original work. Furthermore, the person seems to be non-notable. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cao Thu.jpg.
- File:Tham than nhan 2.jpg
- File:30 năm Bác về Kiến An.jpg
- File:Ông Cao Thu về Tỉnh đội.jpg
- File:OngCao Thu chu nhiem cau lac bo.jpg
- File:Ong Cao Thu Chinh tri vien.jpg
- File:Ong Cao Thu làm Giam doc Xi nghiep Co khi Kien An.jpg
Unnamed UserName me 01:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
It is obviously more than just geometric forms. It is therefore above the treshold. JTCEPB (talk) 01:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete My first version was already at the limit for geometric forms. But the new version is above. I think the file should be deleted. --Malo95 (talk) 06:48, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious license; photo from 1957 Mexico newspaper - no reason provided why it is cc-by-sa-4.0 ; {{PD-Mexico}} does not seem to apply. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
looks like advert for https://www.wedmegood.com/profile/House-of-Tushaom-707471 Eatcha (talk) 06:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Krd 16:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/ Barend Blankert
[edit]Artist is still alive - we need OTRS from the artist
- File:ING - Barend Blankert - Framed in the doorway (2006 - 2007) (3683729765).jpg
- File:ING - Barend Blankert - De strafschop van Frank de Boer (2001) (3683729533).jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SHB2000 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/can-you-spare-time-mentor-change-adebisi-ademola-alimi. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- But definitely not their own work SHB2000 (talk) 06:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: is see it above too. --Krd 16:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Google Map copyvio Enyavar (talk) 08:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
screenshot of GoogleMaps: Copyright violation Enyavar (talk) 09:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 09:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal pic, useless without context. Fl.schmitt (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused diagram, useless without context. Fl.schmitt (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
no value Kotofey2016 (talk) 11:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Google Map Screenshot: Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 11:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Google Earth Screenshot: Copyvio. (Please consider using OpenStreetMap instead?) Enyavar (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 12:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 12:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, not taken in 2018: https://www.geo.tv/latest/345197-pakistani-director-s-suleman-passes-away-at-the-age-of-80 MKFI (talk) 12:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Google maps screenshot; copyvio Enyavar (talk) 16:36, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Google maps screenshot; copyvio Enyavar (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, family photo JopkeB (talk) 14:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
|
This file has been superseded by Myclimate 201x logo.svg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
|
|
- Keep: We do not delete outdated versions of logos just because there is a newer one. --Achim (talk) 20:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Bad quality, blurred photo, not realistically useful for educational purpose JopkeB (talk) 14:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Krd This file still exists, despite your closing. --JopkeB (talk) 16:34, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 10:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:06, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not useful. The notes are in a font that is so small that they are barely legible when the image fills a 1980x1024 screen. It might be useful if redone with larger notes. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Meaningless deletion request - the image can be zoomed. The aspect ratio of the image was chosen to bring out the details of the "labor note". (Devrude) (talk to me)
Kept: in use. --Krd 17:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Najmul.joy23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:Najmul Islam Joy.jpg
- File:Najmul Islam Joy in Jamana Future Park.jpg
- File:Najmul Islam Joy in Univarsity.jpg
- File:Najmul Islam Joy wearing Alma Mater's Merchandise.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 16:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Self-promotion of CountMaes = Thomas Maes, art dealer. Subject figures on all images, most of them carry authorship watermarks, therefore not own work either.
- File:Count Thomas Maes at Monaco.jpg
- File:Count Thomas Maes at Belgium Diamond and Art event.jpg
- File:Count Thomas Maes Monaco.jpg
- File:Thomas Maes Count at Belgium.jpg
- File:Count Thomas Maes At Belgium Diamond Event.jpg
- File:Count Thomas Maes at Royal house and Napoleon museum.jpg
- File:Count Thomas Maes Belgium.jpg
- File:Count Thomas Maes at Select Art Event Chania Greece.jpg
- File:Count Thomas Maes given title.jpg
- File:Thomas Maes.pdf
- File:Count Thomas Maes Event Chania Greece.jpg
- File:Count Thomas Maes.jpg
Henxter (talk) 15:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Lacking evidence that Apple relased their UI elements under Creative Commons license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
In the second structure, there is an extra double bond. The file has been corrected as File:Wiki edit process.jpg, so this incorrect version is no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 17:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. However, the replacement is substantially lower resolution (screen-cap/thumbnail of the PDF), the image-description of it is useless, and doesn't give credit to the original from which is it clearly derived. Wonder if the original can be edited in situ, or better yet, exported as a vector image to correct without loss of resolution? DMacks (talk) 18:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @DMacks and Marbletan: I've done a quick and dirty conversion of the original to SVG and uploaded it at File:Atom Economy - Claisen and Wittig Example.svg for ease of editing/translation/etc. A SVG or PNG version of this structure would be preferable to a JPG. Keeping the attribution intact is also necessary, as DMacks pointed out. clpo13(talk) 19:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for creating this file! I edited it to apply the correction that was needed in the original PDF. It sounds like the original PDF needs to be kept, in which case I withdraw the nomination for that version. So now maybe the JPG version should be deleted instead, because it is low quality and no longer necessary? Marbletan (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @DMacks and Marbletan: I've done a quick and dirty conversion of the original to SVG and uploaded it at File:Atom Economy - Claisen and Wittig Example.svg for ease of editing/translation/etc. A SVG or PNG version of this structure would be preferable to a JPG. Keeping the attribution intact is also necessary, as DMacks pointed out. clpo13(talk) 19:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete both, File:Atom Economy - Claisen and Wittig Example.pdf and the low-quality JPG version File:Wiki edit process.jpg. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Piotr Swieboda (talk · contribs)
[edit]A mix of old images (mainly) and new images, none of which have exif. Unlikely to be own work
- File:Anna Kopyto.jpg
- File:Mgr inż. Piotr Świeboda.jpg
- File:Dr inż. Marian Zastawny.jpg
- File:Mgr inż. Piotr Dudek.png
- File:Mgr inż. Krzysztof Ruszczyński.png
- File:Dr inż. Andrzej Fórmaniak.png
- File:Prof. dr inż. Ryszard Chmielowiec.png
- File:Inż. Adam Ostrowski.png
- File:Dr inż. Jan Dzienisiewicz.png
- File:Inż. Jerzy P. Baraniecki.png
- File:Gen. dypl. inż. Jerzy P. Morawicz.png
- File:Inż. Jerzy Anatol Reicher.png
- File:Prof. dr inż. M. Sas-Skowroński.png
- File:Inż. Jerzy S. Kucięba.png
- File:Dr inż. Stanisław Wyrobek.png
- File:Inż. Zbigniew Świdziński.png
- File:Dr inż. Stanisław Karol Liszka.png
- File:Inż. Czesław Woyno.png
- File:Inż. Henryk M. Hajducki.png
- File:Prof. dr inż. Roman Wajda.png
- File:Inż. Marian A. Batkowski.png
- File:Inż. Antoni Wasiutyński.png
- File:Inż. Józef Zenon Różański.png
- File:Prof. inż. Feliks Olszak.png
- File:Inż. J Barcikowski.jpg
- File:Prof. dr inż. Stanisław Płużański.png
Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
|
|
This file has been superseded by Myclimate 201x logo.svg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
|
|
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
|
|
This file has been superseded by Myclimate 201x logo.svg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
|
|
Deleted: see above. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This image seems to a architectural concept drawing, likely not own work copyright status uncertain. MKFI (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 10:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Appears on teslarati with attribution: "SpaceX – Elon Musk". Cryptic-waveform (talk) 18:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Also appears on Elon Musk's twitter feed: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1422780001183834117. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 18:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work- Non free logo held by "AMC Network International " ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 06:10, 13 October 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Danut100 --Krdbot 13:38, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo —Andreitalk 21:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: copyvio. --Sîmbotin (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
拾い物の画像にトリミング、色調補正を加えて「自分が撮影した」と偽っているため。（ https://www.tohoku-gakuin.jp/info/top/190917-1.html ） ブルーメンタール (talk) 02:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Insertion of deliberately false information. Plagiarized from Tohoku Gakuin University's Website. --49.104.5.84 07:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
拾い物の画像にトリミング、色調補正、台形補正を加えて「自分が撮影した」と偽っているため。（ https://blog.imachizu.com/entry/2020/07/01/193000 ） ブルーメンタール (talk) 02:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Insertion of deliberately false information. Plagiarized from Website of Imachizu（いまちず！）. --49.104.5.84 07:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The concern is the UK's low Threshold of Originality , in releation to the logo left, The FA doesn't generally release logos under CC licence. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Watermark and metadata: Ivan Duda. Anatoliy (talk) 17:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
doubtful own work claim. - Non-free logo for !P.A.S.A. Irodotos F.C. " at English Wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- to be deleted immediately, far above TOO --Vale93b (talk) 22:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, Non-free logo/title art held by "Double Fine Presents" ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
unecessary nsfw image Orizan (talk) 18:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Human sexual behavior is within commons scope. However dubious website resolution photo with no EXIF by user with no other contributions; uncat, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:44, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
The copyright of this file was restored in the US by the URAA because in 1996 the file wasn't in the public domain in the United Kingdom. 79.151.30.172 21:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The image was created in the UK in 1936, so it entered the British Public Domain in 2006, when its copyright expired. Normally, where the image was first created takes precident over other countries.Angelgreat (talk) 01:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- The image was created in the UK in 1936, so it entered the British Public Domain in 2007, when its copyright expired. Normally, where the image was first created takes precident over other countries.Angelgreat (talk) 01:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- For stay in Commons, it must be in Public Domain in the country of origin and also in the United States.
--79.151.30.172 02:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.151.31.9 (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
- To the IP user, I highly recommend creating a Wikimedia account. It will make things easier. Angelgreat (talk) 03:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: URAA can't be the sole reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 79.151.31.9 as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free image. Previously this file was also uploaded in English Wikipedia by the same user that uploaded it here. In August, it was deleted from Wikipedia, see the link of that discussion. Previously kept at DR, ineligible for speedy. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- At the time, I didn't realize that it was public domain in the UK (where it was originally created), so I uploaded it under US copyright. Had I known that it was public-domain in the UK at the time, I would have uploaded it here. Angelgreat (talk) 20:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 23:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Unofficial mission patch. See https://www.launchpins.com/store/p23/starship-sn1-patch-pin.html#/. Out of scope. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 18:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 22:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it and I would no longer like it to be here. Thanks KRZMagister (talk) 00:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Commons license are irrevocable, useful photo. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Metadata credits Thomas Biarneix, which is a different person from the uploader. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Captiahmediasource (talk · contribs)
[edit]likely upload for promotion see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jameson_C._Montgomery
Eatcha (talk) 07:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Clearly self-promotional. Person not relevant for German Wikipedia (Article deleted). No other uses. KaKaulla (talk) 07:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Has OTRS and is use on Wikidata. --Gbawden (talk) 06:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
en:Draft:SEIMS was deleted, Simeon Bartholomew is not mentioned in en.wiki. Probably the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; probably copyvio as well. --Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused simple logo, seems out of project scope. en:Corgan Pictures was deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal diagram, useless without context. Fl.schmitt (talk) 10:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of Bellagio - statua della dea egizia Sekhmet - 202109271816.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
This image was uploaded despite the uploader was told that the copyright status was not clear and they said that they understood. When asked about it, they told me "I wanted to see what feedback I would get from the process. I understood that the image would be deleted."
User:Pigsonthewing changed the license to PD-UK-anon. The template says "This tag can be used only when the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry. If you wish to rely on it, please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was. " Pigsonthewing did not do this.
This is not an anonymous work. There is a credit given in the original source. It is unclear if this image is still copyrighted. It should not have been uploaded until the status was clear. It can be uploaded again if that question is resolved. Pack My Box (talk) 16:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Pack My Box I accept the ruling and will continue to do research to determine the copyright status. Thanks. Tchula65 (talk) 16:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Pack My Box: "There is a credit given in the original source." Then tell us where, and what it says, please. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- The license template you added says "This tag can be used only when the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry. If you wish to rely on it, please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was." What steps did you take to identify the author? Have you looked at the source? The credit below the image. Pack My Box (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Again: You assert that "There is a credit given in the original source." Where is it and what does it say? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Pack My Box Andy Mabbett I hope I am answering the question "There is a credit given in the original source" question. Mr Levin, Editor at British History Online provided a copy of the image that was enhanced so the names of the printer is visible, located in the lower right corner of the print. My next steps are to check with Edinburgh City Archive to see if they have any information on the business then see if I can actually locate the copyright information itself and see what status it is assigned. Should'a probably done that first but I'm on a path so I'll follow it to its logical end. Thanks. Tchula65 (talk) 13:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Pigsonthewing Again I ask - have you looked at the source? As I have already said, the credit is in the source, below the image. Go and look. You can read what it says for yourself. What steps did you take before you added that template? I think clicking on the link and looking at the source would be the very least you could do. Pack My Box (talk) 15:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'll try a third time, with greater emphasis: you say "There is a credit given in the original source." Then tell us where, and what it says, please. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sir, do you not understand what I have already written? Simply go to the source and look for yourself. Pack My Box (talk) 03:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- I understand every word that you have written; and what you have not. I have asked you - several times now - what the "credit given in the original source" says; and you either will not or can not tell us. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:50, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- ...and now it seems we will never know, as Pack My Box is indef blocked as "Clearly not here to contribute to Commons". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sir, do you not understand what I have already written? Simply go to the source and look for yourself. Pack My Box (talk) 03:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'll try a third time, with greater emphasis: you say "There is a credit given in the original source." Then tell us where, and what it says, please. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Again: You assert that "There is a credit given in the original source." Where is it and what does it say? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- The license template you added says "This tag can be used only when the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry. If you wish to rely on it, please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was." What steps did you take to identify the author? Have you looked at the source? The credit below the image. Pack My Box (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I would echo Andy's question, "Then tell us where, and what it says, please." I cannot see it. PMB's claim is not that such a thing might be discoverable by research, but that "There is a credit given" (which no-one else has found). That's just playing games for the hell of it.
- As a work that we can date to being 123 years old and anonymously unknown as best as current researches have found it, I'm happy to claim that PD status for it. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and Andy Dingley. --Gbawden (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
salah masuk portal Suhendro winarso (talk) 16:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
salah masuk portal Suhendro winarso (talk) 16:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
salah masuk portal Suhendro winarso (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation + CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) JopkeB (talk) 16:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Bienvenue sur la liste des artistes peintres accueillis à Céret, pour leur rendre hommage.jpg
[edit]
recent artwork (2020) and there is no FoP in France Culex (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Les 3 éléments composant l'hommage sculptural aux artistes peintres ayant oeuvré à Céret.jpg
[edit]
recent artwork (2020) and there is no FoP in France Culex (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 1996.
Martin Sg. (talk) 14:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FMSky as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted to regular DR as nominator did not provide any evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably taken from https://www.atreeinafieldrecords.com/wp-content/uploads/Alex-Buess-BW-1225x1222.jpg - PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Walter Camacho Marin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Was previously tagged as copyvio by Roqz, citing the FaceApp ToU. There are two things to discuss here: 1) whether these images are copyrightable; and 2) whether they are in scope. On the first point, they appear to be automatically generated by an AI based on a PD image from the Wikipedia article, so we need to discuss if FaceApp has contributed any creative elements that merit copyright protection (irrespective of what its terms of use say) or if it is uncopyrightable as the work of an algorithm. On the second point, the images are currently COM:INUSE on Spanish Wikipedia. However, they were all added by the uploader, so if anyone wishes to remove them, then they are no longer automatically in COM:SCOPE. Then it becomes a question of whether it is useful for Commons to host large quantities of modern AI recreations of historical portraits.
- File:Rodrigo Carazo Odio q.jpg
- File:Ricardo Jimenez Oreamuno.jpg
- File:Alfredo Gonzalez Flores 1.jpg
- File:Federico Tinoco.jpg
- File:Otilio Ulate.jpg
- File:Rafael Yglesias.jpg
- File:Jose Joaquin Rodriguez.jpg
- File:Bernardo Soto.jpg
- File:Carlos Durán.jpg
- File:Prospero Fernadez.jpg
- File:Saturnino Lizano.jpg
- File:Aniceto Esquivel.jpg
- File:Tomas Guardia Gutierrez.jpg
- File:Bruno Carranza.jpg
- File:Jesus Jimenez Zamora.jpg
- File:Jose Maria Montealegre.jpg
- File:Juan Mora Porras.jpg
- File:José Maria Castro Madriz.jpg
- File:Ascensión Esquivel Ibarra.jpg
- File:Cleto Gonzales Viquez.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Hi, another user and myself have now removed the sole usage of these files in es.wiki. In this particular case, the generated faces are a 'guess' and they look (subjectively) very different as how these individuals, which were in most cases mestizo latinoamericans, might have looked. The AI filters might have been trained with another ethnic group dataset to which it has a very strong bias (to my eyes the gallery look like members of a euro/american parliament or the like). Also, the files uploaded by these user and their alternate account 'Walter Camacho 5654' tend to be just copied from elsewhere, which is also troubling. There have been deletion requests made by another user and myself about this, but is a bit tiring doing reverse image searches for each one. --Roqz (talk) 03:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Assuming good faith from uploader, but dubious license per FaceApp, dubious results. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:45, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Walter Camacho Marin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, personal, non encyclopedic photos - propably made from popular mobile app.
Matlin (talk) 09:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
拾い物の画像にトリミング、色調補正、台形補正を加えて「自分が撮影した」と偽っているため。（ https://ameblo.jp/tgu-gakuseikai-hp/entry-12382000876.html ） ブルーメンタール (talk) 02:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Insertion of deliberately false information. Plagiarized from Website of the Student organization of Tohoku Gakuin University. --49.104.5.84 07:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- This file shot the monitor displayed the photo.--49.104.26.96 09:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
公式ページの画像にトリミング、色調補正を加えて無断転載したもの。（ https://www.tohoku-gakuin.ac.jp/info/top/140718-1.html ） ブルーメンタール (talk) 02:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Insertion of deliberately false information. Plagiarized from Website of Tohoku Gakuin University. --49.104.5.84 07:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Plagiarized from Website of Tohoku Gakuin University.--49.104.26.96 09:35, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
拾い物の画像にトリミング、色調補正、台形補正を加えて「自分が撮影した」と偽っているため。（ https://blog.imachizu.com/entry/2020/07/01/193000 ） ブルーメンタール (talk) 02:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Insertion of deliberately false information. Plagiarized from Website of Imachizu（いまちず！）. --49.104.5.84 07:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- This file shot the monitor displayed the photo.--49.104.26.96 09:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Clearly self-promotional. Person not relevant for German Wikipedia (Article deleted). No other uses. KaKaulla (talk) 07:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Clearly promotionial aim. Florian Goll is not relevant for German Wikipedia (Article deleted). No other uses. KaKaulla (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Clearly self-promotional intention. Source: Florian Goll, but he ist not relevant for German Wikipedia (Article deleted). No other uses. KaKaulla (talk) 07:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, not mentioned in en:Clever. In my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Info: https://www.prov.org/resources/technology-resources/clever, https://clever.com/ --Achim (talk) 08:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Purushotham9966 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copies of an interview and some old photos, taken from N.S.Krishnamurthy files - needs permission
- File:Coverpage of Andhra Dance Sculpture by N.S.K.jpg
- File:శ్రీమతి పార్వతి శ్రీకృష్ణమూర్తి ,శ్రీ నేలనుతల శ్రీకృష్ణమూర్తి.jpg
- File:N.S.Krishnamurthy.jpg
- File:A group photo with N.S.K and others.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.13.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.12.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.11.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.10.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.8.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.9.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.7.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.6.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.5.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.4.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.2.jpg
- File:Interview with N.S.K by Dr k.purushotham page.3.jpg
- File:Nagaratam (1).jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Too low resolution, unreadable map legend. There is a better version of the map: File:Where-to-be-born-index-2013.jpg Yellow Horror (talk) 10:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
I can't see that this has an educational purpose, and it has nothing to do with the UK charity that it has been categorised under WereSpielChequers (talk) 12:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/IOS 6 Map
[edit]ios map screenshots. Not free
- File:IOS 6 Maps New York 2012-09-20 SML Screenshots (8005564996).jpg
- File:IOS 6 Map Central, Hong Kong 2012-09-20 SML Screenshots (8005923382).jpg
- File:IOS 6 Maps Search Lung King Heen No Results Found 2012-09-20 SML Screenshots (8005931922).jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
mentioned license is unavailable at the source of image. Gpkp (talk) 16:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Dupliacte of "Bellagio - statua della dea egizia Sekhmet - 202109271816 2.jpg"
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, Cover art most likely copyright to it's artist or to the publishers "Penguin Books" . ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Animation work that is done professionally. Likely part of copyrighted work Orizan (talk) 18:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and no clear educational purpose. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that it's Satoshi Nakamoto or any other notable person. --ghouston (talk) 07:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, no evidence this photos is of who it proports to be. The uploader has been spamming multiple projects with nonsense about how they are the creator of bitcoin and asking people to email them. 192.76.8.77 14:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Изображение не соответствует действительности, поскольку взято с отзеркаленного видео. Последнее, в свою очередь, может поднимать вопросы об авторском праве, поскольку это не исходное, а обработанное видео Mike Somerset (talk) 07:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: there appears no creative input if this is a processed video. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Изображение не соответствует действительности, поскольку взято с отзеркаленного видео. Последнее, в свою очередь, может поднимать вопросы об авторском праве, поскольку это не исходное, а обработанное видео Mike Somerset (talk) 07:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: there appears no creative input if this is a processed video. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CollectifHUMANIS67 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed as own work but the author is clearly stated in the exif. The organogram also needs OTRS. Also scope?
Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
not own work: selfie from Giorgio Ferrero Bradipo Lento (talk) 09:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. This image has been bouncing around the web for sometime - try a Google search. Difficult to be sure of its origins. Given the low definition of this version, it seems probable that this was just lifted from a website. I think we need a bit more evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder as they claim Headlock0225 (talk) 09:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
This is not a PD image, because we do not know the death year for the anonymous author of this work, and we cannot prove that it was legally published online. PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
This is not a PD image, because we do not know the death year for the anonymous author of this work, and we cannot prove that it was legally published online. PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:58, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Not likely to be own work Pahlevun (talk) 15:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader with other proven copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
recent artwork (2020) and there is no FoP in France Culex (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
recent artwork (2020) and there is no FoP in France Culex (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: artwork DM, other buildings likely old enough. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- @P199: The 2020 artwork is the iron open door and its frame. The statue itself is in Public domain. As there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, this photo is a copyvio. Culex (talk) 15:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Culex: It's a small, incidental part of the whole image. Please read COM:DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Vue Nord-Ouest de l'ensemble sculptural de l'hommage aux peintres ayant oeuvrés à Céret.jpg
[edit]
recent artwork (2020) and there is no FoP in France Culex (talk) 15:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Vue Sud-Est de l'Hommage aux peintres venus oeuvrer à Céret, et haut de l'Av Clémenceau.jpg
[edit]
recent artwork (2020) and there is no FoP in France Culex (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Haut de l'Av. Clémenceau et place de l'hommage aux peintres pendant le confinement. Automne 2020.jpg
[edit]
recent artwork (2020) and there is no FoP in France Culex (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: artwork DM, other buildings likely old enough. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
- @P199: The 2020 artwork is the iron open door and its frame. The statue itself is in Public domain. As there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, this photo is a copyvio. Culex (talk) 15:42, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Culex: It's a small, incidental part of the whole image. Please read COM:DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? Found it on https://www.pinterest.com/pin/333125703665442325/, uploaded by Teresita Adorno, which does not look like the name of the author on Commons (Nueva Italia) nor the Commons uploader (Ellias Orellado) JopkeB (talk) 16:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Paramount logos
[edit]Bogus copyright claims. I don't know if they are old enough to qualify for {{PD-US-no notice}} or something.
- File:IEYKX5QFEFBCZPULXV5FJHIWDM.jpg
- File:Paramount Network (Black) Logo.png
- File:Paramount Network (Blue) Logo.png
Stefan2 (talk) 16:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: since the logo is from 1915, likely {{PD-US-1923}} applies. See File:Paramount Pictures logo (2021).svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Arkady Lander 3.jpg
- File:Arkady lander later.jpg
- File:Arkady Lander 1.webp
- File:Arkady Lander 2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please DO NOT DELETE my uncles photos. He was a renowned journalist in USSR and then Russia and was brutally beaten for providing an his opinions on government corruption which ultimately led to his death. He was recognized by many journalist organizations around the globe and while Russian propaganda slandering him is out there from Russian media sources, outside news sources have published many articles defending him. Please do not delete the honest legacy he leaves behind. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 73.246.95.47 (talk) 15:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Rudraksha adverts
[edit]- File:Ek Mukhi Rudraksha Price.jpg
- File:1-mukhi-rudraksha.jpg
- File:12-mukhi-rudraksha.jpg
- File:13-mukhi-rudraksha.jpg
- File:Mukhi-rudraksha.jpg
- File:Ganesh rudraksha of Java origin.jpg
- File:Indonesia-rudraksha-mala.jpg
- File:Turmericmala.JPG
- File:Infographic rudraksha.jpg
These files are advertisements for rudraksha beads, advertising the products sold at links listed as the source for each image. Being adverts, they should be deleted. --Scyrme (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Most files are in use, no visible advertising. --Krd 03:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ads being in use is no good reason to keep them. They are photos of merchandise for sale with shop links given as their source; I don't see how showing one's merch and linking where you can buy it doesn't qualify as an ad. The photos don't need the words "buy now" written on them to make the intent behind uploading them clear. This intent is even more clear in context, as putting these files into use has been accompanied by the addition of much less subtle advertising/spam into the same articles, particularly the English-language Wikipedia article for "Rudraksha" which has recently had its protection escalated due to this persistent spam.
- While these files could have their metadata edited to remove the source links, this would mean taking the images without proper attribution, which I'm fairly sure is discouraged on Wikimedia Commons and would contradict the Creative Commons license they have been uploaded with. Since the links can't be removed, the best solution is to simply delete these files.
- There are plenty of alternative photos these subjects which were not uploaded as adverts for merch (many of which are likewise in use), so there is no good reason to keep these files. Scyrme (talk) 03:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: most as copyvios (no free license at source website). Kept 2 with VRT ticket; little advertising content and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sumberjaya2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:PapanNamaStasiun PRU.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun GNG.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun SKI.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun GS.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun GPI.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun PDRG.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun PWJ.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun BDR.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun BJK.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun NGA.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun MGR.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun JMS.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun KTL.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun STP.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun KUN.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun TAS.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun GBA.png
- File:PapanNamaStasiun BSG.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- I uploaded these files mostly as anticipation if the station that will used will be reactivated. For those in Binjai-Besitang railway, an MoU was already signedto reactivate them, so i decided to incorporate the images today in each stations logo. For Sei Mangkei station As evidenced in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5o1NVyVuRU0, Sei Mangkei station are already passively used for freight operations, so i incorporate it as well. Station signs for small stations in Surabaya (listed in this deletion request) should be free to be deleted, since the stations are already dead. Sumberjaya2014 (talk) 02:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: At least 4 of these files are in use on one or more Wikimedia projects in main namespace. Since they all follow a pattern, it goes to reason all might be in scope. No objections against another DR for files not in use. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
incorrect file name Z225020 (talk) 12:38, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
KeepNot a valid reason to delete try changing file name with a a Move instead--Headlock0225 (talk) 10:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Z225020: Who took this photo? Can you upload a higher resolution complete with EXIF/metadata? Thanks. (The 3 other uploads by this user have camera data, this one is the exception...) --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: for now, so that it can be included in a mass nomination, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Z225020. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Fake licence. The artist died in1985 Kotofey2016 (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Please delete the shield with white/silver teardrops (argent). The teardrops should be yellow/golden (or). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phyllopteryx (talk • contribs) 19:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Procedural close: Looks like it was done already, and this is the wrong format for nominating files anyway. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:49, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Self-portrait by Tim Dodd. No evidence that the uploader is Tim Dodd, or that he agreed to publish this picture under cc-by-sa-4.0. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 18:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Falcon9guy:
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). → 
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever VRT has been received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted cropped version, File:Tim Dodd with SpaceX Falcon Heavy at Launch Complex 39A (cropped).jpg. Ellywa (talk) 23:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
The opening sequence is presumably copyrighted. Rest of video is probably fine. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have edited the video file: removed the opening credits, removed closing credits, removed unneeded audio track. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿)
- Gone_Postal: But you have not corrected the false categories that I pointed out on your talk page. Can you actually justify those categories? While this video was made by Digital Surveillance Los Angeles this looks like a UK post office per the oval red logo like this one File:Post Office Logo RGB.png. In the US you would expect to see a blue USPS logo. Ww2censor (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- I believe that you're correct. I have fixed the categories, templates, and description. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Gone_Postal: But you have not corrected the false categories that I pointed out on your talk page. Can you actually justify those categories? While this video was made by Digital Surveillance Los Angeles this looks like a UK post office per the oval red logo like this one File:Post Office Logo RGB.png. In the US you would expect to see a blue USPS logo. Ww2censor (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: resolved (but deleted the original version per nomination). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:45, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
This appears to be UK originated footage based on the Post Office logo shown. Copyright in CCTV footage rest with the operators or owners of the equipment. As it is not clear from the YouTube upload how a (presumed) US uploader obtained UK footage, the media here is under an invalid licence wth potentialy inaccurate attribution. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep CCTV footages do not have a copyright. Yann (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- UK courts seem to think differently: In the case Hyde Park Residence Ltd v. Yelland before the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, "ownership and subsistence of copyright [of the CCTV footage] were not in dispute", because, "as section 1 of the 1988 [Copyright, Designs and Patents] Act makes clear, copyright is a property right" which was owned by the security company. XxakixX (talk) 12:15, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete In addition to the above, the selection of footage and presentation likely add creative elements. The attention-grabbing filename and description suggest to me that this file also violates COM:NOTWEBHOST (someone should create COM:NOTYOUTUBE at this point). I am astounded that Template:PD-CCTV still exists. 69.174.144.79 22:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Theatrical performances and performances in general are copyrighted and cannot be uploaded without permission from the authors of the play AND the performers. Xia (talk) 07:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Theatrical performances and performances in general are copyrighted and cannot be uploaded without permission from the authors of the play AND the performers. Xia (talk) 07:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Yet more of this set of images of children being punished, of no encyclopedic merit The Anome (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Keep for the same reasons as:
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Welsh Not child in Wales Punished for speaking Welsh BIG 3.png
This image is of educational value, and is used on the Welsh Wikipedia page. It will also be used on the cywiki article, shortly. John Jones (talk) 15:27, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Strong keep. No physical punishment seen (other than in The Anome's eye). Excellent encyclopaedic merit, illustrates a difficult article (very political to English people), in a very sensitive way. Shows how the Welsh Not was worn by children in the 18th and 19th century. Cell Danwydd (talk) 16:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete This child abuse image has been replaced with more accurate one by the same contributor, following discussion on en wiki. Llwyld (talk) 06:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete: Fictional. Shall I upload a CGI image 'File:John Jones.jpg' with the rationale "I don't have a fitting photo but theoretically he might look this way"? --Achim (talk) 08:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep: Possibly the creator should add a note "Inspired by the picture on the cover of the book Under the Welsh Not (2019) by Myrddin ap Dafydd, ISBN 978-1845276836. (See here for book details)". Martinvl (talk) 15:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Image is in use across multiple projects and has no license issues. Commons deletion discussions should not be used as an end run around local project editorial consensus. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Looks fine to me, and better illustrates the topic than the image of an entire Welsh schoolroom. --RAN (talk) 23:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Yet more of this set of images of children being punished, of no encyclopedic merit The Anome (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Not educational - per discussion on en wikipedia, the uploader has replaced this child abuse image with a more accurate one. Llwyld (talk) 12:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Image used in discussion on English Wikipedia, previously used in article and has the potential for future educational use. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use on talk page. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Yet more of this set of images of children being punished, of no encyclopedic merit The Anome (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Not educational - per discussion on en wikipedia, the uploader has replaced this child abuse image with a more accurate one. Llwyld (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Image used in discussion on English Wikipedia, on Commons, previously used in article and has the potential for future educational use. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Looks fine to me, the image used in the article is a very poor representation, showing a whole school room. I do prefer when we stick to one style of illustration for a topic, like we did for the various sex positions. --RAN (talk) 23:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use on talk page. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Yet more of this set of images of children being punished, of no encyclopedic merit The Anome (talk) 12:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Not educational - per discussion on en wikipedia, the uploader has replaced this child abuse image with a more accurate one. Llwyld (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Wrong duplicate from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pablo_Daniel_Blanco.png MinervaAustral (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Theatrical performances and performances in general are copyrighted and cannot be uploaded without permission from the authors AND the performers. Although Attila József, the poet who wrote this poem has died long ago, the performer's rights are still there as there are no two performers who would recite a poem the same way. Xia (talk) 07:17, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- It's a public and not specially theatrical performance, therefore it's a libre material & not copyvio at all SZERVÁC Attila (talk) 07:27, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @SZERVÁC Attila: , you might make a screenshot in order to have a portrait of the performer. This is allowed if you own the copyright on this video. --Ellywa (talk) 20:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Theatrical performances and performances in general are copyrighted and cannot be uploaded without permission from the authors of the play/song AND the performers. Xia (talk) 07:18, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- We are the authors and performers :) Balázs & me :-) SZERVÁC Attila (talk) 07:30, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- The his written permission is also needed, not just yours. Xia (talk) 07:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @SZERVÁC Attila: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holders/photographer/filmer to publish the image(s) on Commons with a free license. If successful, the film can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
its an old logo of Qatar National Bank Smteamqnb (talk) 10:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:19, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
The logo is wrong and the source is not valid (Vektordaten:http://www.qnb.com.qa/csportal/BlobServer?blobcol=urlenglishdoc&blobtable=QNBNewDocs&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1277618519118&blobheader=application%2FpdfFarbinfo:http://www.qnb.com/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1355512253062&ssbinary=true) Smteamqnb (talk) 08:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Added a working archieved source. What exactly is wrong with the logo? Unfortunately the http://www.qnb.com.qa website does not seem to be working, so I cannot verify whether this logo is still used or not. Ankry (talk) 12:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 20:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
These are claimed to be "own work" which is obviously not correct -- the subject died in 1874. The B&W images are PD, but the colorized ones are not. Colorization creates a new copyright, so if the work was not done by the uploader, they are copyvios. Also, we have File:Josiah Warren.jpg which is properly described. I'm not sure we need any of these, as colorization adds little, particularly since we do not actually know his hair color or that his face was so ruddy.
As for the signature, no source is given and, again, "own work" is claimed. If it is "own work" then it's a forgery and has no value to us. If not, we need the source.
- File:Josiah Warren portrait.jpg
- File:Josiah Warren colored portrait.jpg
- File:Josiah Warren Colored.jpg
- File:Josiah Warren signature.png
- File:Josiah Warren 2.jpg
- File:Josiah Warren Face HD.png
- File:Josiah Warren HD.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
I would like to remove the following images. Reason: The images are duplicates.
- File:Josiah Warren 2.jpg Delete
- File:Josiah Warren Face HD.png Delete
- File:Josiah Warren HD.jpg Delete
p.s. The photos were based on a lower resolution image, since the original image has been found these images are no longer necessary - except Josiah Warren portrait.jpg. --RVD3 (talk) 22:26, 29 December 2021 (UTC)RVD3
- Keep It is easier to fix and link to the original, rather than delete. --RAN (talk) 23:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Delete three per COM:REDUNDANT, kept the others which are in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
The licence tag makes a good case that this is PD in India but if the copyright lapsed in 2016 it would still be under URAA copyright Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Please check this. Thanks.--Kanags (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: Any updates?--Kanags (talk) 06:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As far as I am aware we delete recent uploads if they are copyrighted under URAA. --Ellywa (talk) 20:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Frauenfriedenskirche
[edit]Building by Hans Herkommer (1887-1956), artwork by Ruth Schaumann (1899-1975) and Tobias Kammerer, not covered by FOP.
- File:Chororgel Frauenfrieden.jpg
- File:Frauenfrieden Altarinsel.jpg
- File:Frauenfriedenskirche Bockenheim innen1.jpg
- File:Frauenfriedenskirche, Frankfurt, Interior view 20210828 1.jpg
- File:Frauenfriedenskirche, Frankfurt, Interior view 20210828 2.jpg
- File:Frauenfriedenskirche, Frankfurt, Interior view 20210828 3.jpg
- File:Frauenfriedenskirche, Frankfurt, Interior view 20210828 4.jpg
- File:Frauenfriedenskirche, Frankfurt, Interior view 20210828 5.jpg
- File:Hochchor und Altarwand Frauenfrieden.jpg
- File:Innenraum Frauenfrieden.jpg
- File:Krypta Frauenfrieden.jpg
- File:Taufkapelle Frauenfriedenskirche .jpg
Didym (talk) 23:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Can the pictures be auto-undeleted in 2026, or do I need to mark my calendar? At least in my pictures, the artwork clearly is not the main subject. --DXR (talk) 06:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:FOP Germany. The interior of churches is copyrighted and cannot be published without permission. This is also the case of the church interior. --Ellywa (talk) 20:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)