Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/05/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 3rd, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty book page; single-page image doesn't make sense Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Nothing to do. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty book page Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@: Thanks for the hint; I wasn't aware of that category. I'll use it for this and for future blank pages. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Nothing to do. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 14:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nguyentanlap94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation SummerPhDv2.0 (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

iiiiikkiikiik Jethro Samuel (talk) 14:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Speedy kept – vandalism. --jdx Re: 17:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from here: Online=https://www.rugenbraeu.ch/ueber-uns/ Alpöhi (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 12:24, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.rugenbraeu.ch/ueber-uns/ --Krdbot 18:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/pr-marcio-valadao/ ServB1 (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-igreja/o-mais-que-ele-fara/ ServB1 (talk) 14:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-noticia/pastor-marcio-valadao-45-anos-a-frente-da-nossa-amada-lagoinha/ ServB1 (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-noticia/pastor-marcio-valadao-na-conferencia-destino/ ServB1 (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-noticia/a-digitalizacao-da-rede-super-nao-e-questao-de-luxo-e-sim-se-sobrevivencia/ ServB1 (talk) 14:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-noticia/tudo-pode-esperar-mas-o-amor-nao-disse-ana-paula-valadao/ ServB1 (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-noticia/o-pastor-paulo-ministrou-palavra-sobre-missoes-na-manha-de-sabado-do-congresso-do-diante-do-trono/ ServB1 (talk) 14:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ ServB1 (talk) 14:37, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ ServB1 (talk) 14:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ ServB1 (talk) 14:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ ServB1 (talk) 14:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ ServB1 (talk) 14:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ ServB1 (talk) 14:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-noticia/ana-paula-valadao-prega-sobre-a-constante-da-vida-no-encerramento-do-congresso-do-dt/ ServB1 (talk) 14:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-noticia/tudo-pode-esperar-mas-o-amor-nao-disse-ana-paula-valadao/ ServB1 (talk) 14:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-noticia/manha-de-celebracao-pelos-20-anos-do-congresso-diante-do-trono-adoracao-intercessao-e-missao/ ServB1 (talk) 14:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of https://www.lagoinha.com/ibl-noticia/tudo-pode-esperar-mas-o-amor-nao-disse-ana-paula-valadao/ ServB1 (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:48, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: as redirect, no need to delete, correct term in German. --Achim (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from https://auto.ndtv.com/tvs-bikes/apache-rr-310 The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 20:23, 3 Mai 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:TVS Apache 310.png --Krdbot 00:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from https://auto.ndtv.com/tvs-bikes/apache-rr-310 The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Category:Yulia Tymoshenko or wrongly constructed gallery? E4024 (talk) 06:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn by nominator. --E4024 (talk) 11:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Zimbio: http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/g9joHtvBMJs/Billboard+Women+In+Music+2016/xC_5muE7Ah1/Nick+Jonas Drown Soda (talk) 21:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Srittau at 06:55, 4 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.gettyimages.com/license/628757282 --Krdbot 12:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Previously nominated and reverted by Jeff G. with comment Deny Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC) Pinging original nom @Jaimmeeridlee and Jeff G.: Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Single image gallery with a strange title. E4024 (talk) 13:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, wrong namespace. --Achim (talk) 18:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SLV100 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from talk page: {{Proposed deletion}} {{subst:Dfu}} {{Db-f3}} {{Db-noncom}} Photographer does not have permission from artist, Andy Goldsworthy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniellewu (talk • contribs) 18:58, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Converted by me to DR, as this needs a bit of discussion. I assume the nominator's rationale means that the depicted garden/wall structure is a copyrighted work of art and thereby the image might violate the copyright of the architect Andy Goldsworthy. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image might be allowed, if there is freedom-of-panorama exception. However, there is no information where it is located. --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The statue seems to be in the US: http://collection.stormking.org/artist/andy-goldsworthy/ Icarusgeek (talk) 11:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.
Then, the most important question is, whether the depicted structure is a "building" in the sense of U.S. copyright law Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. --Túrelio (talk) 12:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is an artwork that is copyrighted by the artist. The artist has not given permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniellewu (talk • contribs) 22:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 08:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation of the depicted person's personality right or right of publicity - Commons:Project scope, Personality rights 최광모 (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation of the depicted person's personality right or right of publicity - Commons:Project scope, Personality rights 최광모 (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation of the depicted person's personality right or right of publicity - Commons:Project scope, Personality rights 최광모 (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation of the depicted person's personality right or right of publicity - Commons:Project scope, Personality rights 최광모 (talk) 09:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image apparently shows two plots of observed data over time, the upper one ranging 10pm to 10am, the lower one ranging from 10am to 10pm.

However, neither in the image itself nor in the description any information about the data is available. Therefore, the plot is of no use (except to intimidate laymen by ununderstandable scientific-looking curves).

Similar criticism applies to hundreds of other images without sufficient description. I randomly chose this image to start a principal discussion. Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info I have added the rubric (in French) which is in the document before the numeric tables. I have also marked this to be fully uncropped but using the following page on IA, which shows the graph unfolded. -- (talk) 10:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@: Thanks for adding the information. For this image, I'd withdraw my deletion request. (It wouldn't be possible to configure your bot to provide that information automatically, e.g. by including more context, by using regular expressions to detect un-understandable character sequences like the original before-image text Bu^fc/in de ZUcadennf ^' ^ ^ ^-iç /^^'7^rr,^ /^/r>. rtiiitf r/i /'fu/t .5J.O *.')", or/and by performing less image cropping?)

More generally, I understand (and appreciate!) that you are mainly concerned with mass uploads, and hence don't have time for tediously investigating each image and its description. Would you agree to delete an image if no information about its contents can be obtained, such that its purpose remains unknown? I guess this applies e.g. to many Flickr images when no additional source (like Archive) is available.

As a related issue, I sometimes searched in Commons for an ancient original scientific publication, and found an appropriate category, which, however, contained only selected images and drawings, but not the whole publication. In these cases, I'd have liked to find a Djvu of Pdf of the whole publication, or Jpgs files also from the text-only pages. I understand that this would increase the Commons data volume significantly; on the other hand, when an article or a book is valuable cultural heritage, it may be worth to have its digital version mirrored a 3rd and 4th time (assuming both Archive and Commons mirror their data once). For (e.g.) a whole scientific article the chance is much better that its purpose is apparent than for a few drawings from it. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The text in these uploads comes from the IA's own Flickrstream and was a project started three years ago, refer to User:Fæ/Project list/Internet Archive which has a lot of information about it. Though the IA has some OCR text, it is no more reliable that what they posted on Flickr back then, especially for harder to recognize printing and non-English texts.
With regard to deletions, where there is a historical context and more archive information like this one, I would recommend against deletion unless the background has been examined or the image was clearly outside scope, such as completely blank pages or irrelevant scanned modern pages like the library's index card.
If you find images where the whole book is of interest rather than just book plates, then for IA images (which includes the BHL collection), it is possible to upload the whole PDF, examples. Having both illustrations/plates and the full PDF makes sense as illustrating Wikipedia cannot be done with selected pages within a PDF, plus often it is useful for reusers to make crops and derivatives for illustration; most members of the public would be put off if this meant extracting those images from PDFs. Uploading PDFs for existing Commons files is something that could be automated, but truthfully, it would probably be as manually intensive as going to IA and downloading it yourself. The PDFs are links in the IA's catalogue page for an object. In general text pages from any book will be out of scope, unless the book is a manuscript or the print itself is of historic value.
Saying this, if you can put a case for, say, 1,000+ different books from the IA or BHL to be uploaded with obvious relations to categories, I would be happy to consider that as an upload project due to it being too much of a challenge to do manually. Feel free to raise on my talk page if it looks realistic.
-- (talk) 13:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
COM:SCOPE says "Files that might realistically be useful to one or more other Wikimedia projects, e.g. Wikisource or Wikibooks, should be kept; deletions should not be based on the sole ground that the file would be better hosted on one of those other projects. Any media file that is realistically useful to or is within the scope of even one other Wikimedia Foundation project can be hosted here." And basically any scan of an older PD book we don't have is useful to Wikisource. (At least English Wikisource is pretty broad on that; I don't know the exact scope rules for the other Wikisource projects.) So I don't think scope is much of an issue here. I do think value might be; it takes a lot of manpower to process a book, and finding the scans (provided IA has them) and uploading them is but a small part of that.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ and Prosfilaes: Thanks again for the information. I glanced at both User:Fæ/Project list/Internet Archive and COM:SCOPE and will read them in detail in the next future. I take it that if in doubt, upload/keep a file (provided there are no copyright isues). For the particular example image, I'm closing the deletion request. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion request withdrawn: image description is now sufficient. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:53, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jarodri15

[edit]

Multiple bishops and other personalities apparently from the Carabobo state in Venezuela with unclear few or no metadata at all. The image of the current governor, Lacava, is a copyvio, meaning there's the possibility than the rest of the files were found on the internet. I'm unsure if the public domain in Venezuela includes the coat of arms of the state. --Jamez42 (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own works. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of the business does not like the first photo. I already uploaded a newer version of the file, but the old file is still available here. He only wants the second file to be available, not the first. Thanks. QuinteroP (talk) 06:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete the overwritten file should be deleted because it depicts a work of art without permission. The current file is also problematic. However, I think we can blur the artwork or treat it as DM. Maybe the owner can send a permission statement through COM:OTRS. 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the overwritten file is a derivative work, and the new was grabbed from facebook "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploading user does not hold rights, taken from https://stv.tv/sport/football/1390162-scotland-midfielder-darren-fletcher-to-join-stoke-city/ Mattythewhite (talk) 01:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploading user does not hold rights, see http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Michael+Dawson/Hull+City+v+Watford+Premier+League/g3lbiFsVdp7. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploading user does not hold rights, see https://www.sbnation.com/2016/12/24/14076562/todd-bowles-is-having-the-worst-christmas-weekend-ever-jets-patriots. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - non-noteworthy band, image only used on abandoned draft at enwiki. Home Lander (talk) 03:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+photo of photo (unclear copyright status). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:25, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: not basic geometric shapes. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsused personal foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 05:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsused personal foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 05:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsused personal foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 05:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsused personal foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 05:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsused personal foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 05:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsused personal foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 05:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsused personal foto. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 05:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:09, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The internet wayback machine does not have the source page archived for any search for permission. The permission is missing. Secondly, this was uploaded by a banned uploader. Leoboudv (talk) 06:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage and sandbox were speedily deleted in October 2017 as spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 06:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roosterling (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in July 2017 as non-notable. Out of project scope.

xplicit 07:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - above ToO anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of http://acn.com.ve/lacava-vicepresidente-scarano-seria-gobernador-carabobo/ and https://www.el-carabobeno.com/gobernador-presento-presupuesto-2018-carabobo-cercano-bs-400-mil-millones/ (Photographer Ángel Chacón) Jamez42 (talk) 14:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 04:18, 10 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Jarodri15 --Krdbot 06:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

мешает при работе 83.220.236.25 12:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Animist Alan (talk) 05:11, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bigger copy here. Please send a permission, or upload the original file. Yann (talk) 04:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WRT "Bigger copy" - that's a misperception. The Commons image has 961 x 1642 pix; the external image, if excessive white space to the right and the left cropped away, has only 653 x 1094 pix. So, it's unlikely the source, but still may be a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 12:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, point taken. Yann (talk) 12:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jeff G., Yann, Túrelio and anyone else concerned, please stop rising this topic about Nokia N9 image deletion again and again. I hope the topic was closed on May 2, 2018, and I hope it was closed forever, see Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2018-05#Request_to_undelete_File:Nokia_N9.jpg. Referenced "Copyright © 2018 BD Mobile Phone" is nonsense, my image was uploaded in 2011, and the company contact email from the website <[email protected]> bounces. Why do you spend your and my time to promote this bdmobilephone.com on such a resource as Wikimedia? Thank you in advance, please close this discussion. --Animist (talk) 16:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: convinced by Animist: Image was uploaded to Commons in 2011, it's likely that the "BD Mobile Phone" website took it from here. As Túrelio points out, that external image is actually smaller with excessive white space, so it is an unlikely source, and no other possible external source has been mentioned here. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:43, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have never been used on any Wikimedia project since its upload in December 2012. The uploader has one other edit in a sandbox on the Spanish Wikipedia, which was simply self-promotion. Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. xplicit 07:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality out of scope Perumalism Chat 07:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - too low quality to be potentially of use. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:48, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blog owner has decided not to lend permission as it was not him who took this picture Chrishm21 (talk) 11:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per 4nn1l2. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:50, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blog owner has decided not to lend permission as it was not him who took this picture Chrishm21 (talk) 11:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per 4nn1l2. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NO longer useful Nivlek nk (talk) 13:06, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per 4nn1l2. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lots of rendering problems (mis-cropped and/or overlapping items). Unused, and could all be done as mathtex DMacks (talk) 07:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accident reupload (check Janella Salvador.jpg) Loyolla.c (talk) 03:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake. This holds license , and hasn't been approved by the owner for free upload Kramyapr (talk) 05:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 08:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 04:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 00:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anirutnoppanun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader claims "own work" but images can be found on Facebook and http://schoolweb.eduzones.com/bbtschool/ as well.

Migebert (talk) 09:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Anirutnoppanun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This series of uploads (number two of same type by same uploader) contains derivative works, copies of photographs not taken by uploader, posters, logos and so on. Prior DN referenced "Uploader claims "own work" but images can be found on Facebook and http://schoolweb.eduzones.com/bbtschool/ as well." That is the same for these images as well, see COM:L prior to making more uploads.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:49, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 14:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like the re-upload of a recently deleted file. E4024 (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:52, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small, no metadata, user has uploaded (and re-uploaded) many files as "own work" which were later deleted. E4024 (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:52, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anton biederwolf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Some likely recreation of previously deleted files.

— Racconish 18:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Anton biederwolf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish 18:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joaquin Abella Ojeda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish 18:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oliver Castaño Mallorca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope and/or too small to be of any realistic use.

— Racconish 19:26, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cju1688899 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very likely copyvios: inconsistent EXIF info and file sizes; uploader has a history of uploading nothing but copyvios.

Wcam (talk) 20:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:08, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akocsg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus PD claims - scans of newspapers and other publications. Turkey is pma +70, so PD status would be determined by author death, not publication date (and uploader is clearly playing with licenses - [1][2]). Given that most/all of these are from newspapers, authors could likely be determined with appropriate research (i.e., hypothetical anonymous claim would not be valid, as merely unknown to us is not unknown to anyone) - see also user talk (largely blanked), deleted contribs, and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fenerbahçe SK which had an image by this uploader with the same issue.

Эlcobbola talk 22:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Comment - No, they are not bogus claims, just because you would like them to be. Almost all of them are from old defunct newspapers, like Son Posta and Aksam. It's practically impossible to find the original author. So it's valid as it can be. What do the other notes on my talk page have to do with this anyway? What's your point and aim actually? It sounds like you have a personal problem with the content I've uploaded.

Have a try yourself if you see it differently. Because I tried and therefore I know. And another user with patroller rights (Xenon3) here already had the discussion about the pictures in question with me, see here:
diff
my talk page - section called "Genehmigung fehlt" The conclusion was that it's ok to keep them.

A few are even officially used by the Turkish Football Federation, who are not the authors but still use them, which proves that they are Public Domain. Here the links:
the picture of Harbiye
the picture of Muhafizgücü, at page 90 Akocsg (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other people use them is not an argument. Defunct is not an argument. I'd accept it if you had actually viewed the original papers--I don't know about Turkey, but universities and major libraries in the US tend to have fairly complete archives of at least microfilmed newspapers--and found no names, but you don't claim to have done that. The fact the names of the photographers have gotten detached over time does not mean they are anonymous.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's sure comfortable for you to talk like that. I have looked for an archive. The file "File:SonPosta 09.09.1935.jpg" for instance is from a website called "www.futbolistik.com". It (the only source) is down for some time now. The picture above is from there, and was nowhere else to be found. I didn't find an archive either. The newspaper is a leftist one that was closed in 1960 after the coup d'etat, and the article and its image is from 1935! How am I supposed to find the author?? Most of the pics above are under similar/or very resembling circumstances.
Here is an online archive that contains some issues of Aksam (and also Yeni Sabah), where some of the images are from. The archive:
archive
the issue containing "1933 Aksam gazetesi.jpg" (image is at left bottom corner of main page) See for yourself if you find an author/name. I can't see any at all.
I did research them, I do know what I'm talking about. If you think you can do better, then good luck. The 1930s and especially the 40s are quite scarce of material/sources concerning football (effects of WWII in Europe). You can't compare Turkey to the US. I can't really do much else. What do I still have to do to prove they are Public Domain and fair use? Akocsg (talk) 19:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You not being able to find the author does not make it anonymous. I support the use of {{PD-old-assumed}}, but 120 years from publication won't save you on any of these examples. If we can establish that the original newspaper publication did not offer an author (I suspect my lack of Turkish understanding will prevent me from helping), then that will establish they are PD in Turkey.
Fair use means copyrighted but falling under some specific exceptions; Commons does not accept fair use. You need to prove they are public domain.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I can assure you that you won't find any names in these old newspapers, such as in the example I've linked above. Thus they are PD in Turkey. That is also how I labeled them. And again, I've had this discussion with patroller "Xenon3", which can be seen in the links in my first post here.
Since I have shown that those issues in the archive are without names (you can check each one of them), can I put the tags out of the files in question? Akocsg (talk) 20:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Prosfilaes: So what's the status now? In the example above I've shown that the picture in question is indeed PD. Can I remove the tag from that one then? I will try to find the archives for the other ones too, if this is how it goes. Akocsg (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may not remove the tag from anything; it will be done when an admin closes the thread.
I'm not an admin; I won't be closing the thread. It's hard to look at a newspaper (one that obviously is using wire photos for certain elements) in a foreign language and say with assurance that it's truly anonymous according to Turkish standards. If I were an admin, however, I would have no hesitation in deleting files without the correct date and no mention of the original source on the description page.--Prosfilaes (talk) 09:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 21:10, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, found as early as 2012 at https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-_v6PbGj7TfI/UL2n-UOcR1I/AAAAAAAAOmk/bYDMOGs1odQ/s340/Hitruk_2010.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 14:24, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, if you have evidence, that the photographer died before 1948 or the photo was published in USA before 1923, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Imho simple enough. The logo only consists of simple geometric shapes and text just as required. --Frank Murmann (talk) 09:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Imho simple enough. The logo only consists of simple geometric shapes and text just as required. --Frank Murmann (talk) 09:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WetcoastTJL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small/middle sizes without EXIFs : unlikely to be own works but grabbed from social medias such as twitter or facebook

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 4elementtss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Accipite7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works. The sources of the maps must be provided

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 666xme (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:59, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Markdanielusa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

3  Delete --Achim (talk) 14:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photos without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Markdanielusa (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Blatant self-promotion in support of promotional en:User:Markdanielusa (and formerly en:Markdanielusa) and in violation of COM:ADVERT. See also the first DR above.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. By Mischel, Walter,Shoda, Yuichi Psychological Review, Vol 102(2), Apr 1995, 246-268 Keren - WMIL (talk) 06:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I do not see anything eligible for protection in this image. There are only circles and arrows, which are simple geometric shapes. I also think that data, information, and knowledge cannot be protected by copyright law. 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-ineligible}} (ללא סף מקוריות). -- Geagea (talk) 14:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus, too low quality for any educational purpose and we have better images of the entrance. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is our only night shot under this angle, but quality is really very poor. Taivo (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 16:35, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, quality is bad, but I do not find a better photo about the sculpture. If we get a better one, feel free to re-nominate for deletion. Taivo (talk) 17:58, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to have an educational purpose as product is brand new - author of the only draft this is used on is trying to promote product NottNott|talk 23:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the original uploader, it accidentally uploaded twice. I would like to delete the first due it's lower resolution/size. Loyolla.c (talk) 03:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reupload. Please delete this one, keep the most recent one File:Janella Salvador at Mano Po 7 press con.jpg Loyolla.c (talk) 04:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion above. P 1 9 9   15:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright. Shaiyee (talk) 05:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright. Shaiyee (talk) 05:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KichuKishore1995 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality out of scope

Perumalism Chat 07:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, no educational value. Lymantria (talk) 08:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Agree with nom. It's not a simple shop window picture, the WM makes it something else. --E4024 (talk) 08:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality out of Scope Perumalism Chat 08:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sohan Mali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality no exif data unlikely to be own work

Perumalism Chat 08:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NAPBS isn't mentioned in en.wiki and en:NAPBS was deleted. Maybe the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MaheshChorghe96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality

Perumalism Chat 08:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9   15:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del on DE, faulty pic Nolispanmo 08:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused out of scope personal image. E4024 (talk) 09:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope for Commons. If it's a reliable source, use it as ref in WPs. E4024 (talk) 09:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:32, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, out of scope Cabayi (talk) 09:37, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:32, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diego Morell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:33, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not understand, what is depicted. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 10:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Neutral It's a shopping center decorated for Christmas. It's not a great photo (I will point out it's a little awkward to carry a DSLR around in places like that, and you can be thrown out for taking photos), and underdescribed, but what it is seems clear enough for me.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9   15:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requested by subject PR, possible copyright material in forthcoming manuscript Eightnisan (talk) 10:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, out of scope too. P 1 9 9   15:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate; Requested by subject PR, possible copyright material in forthcoming manuscript Eightnisan (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, out of scope too. P 1 9 9   15:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate uploads, plus delete request by subject PR, possible copyright material in forthcoming manuscript Eightnisan (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, out of scope too. P 1 9 9   15:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an out of scope personal image. Was this file deleted before or just the same title? E4024 (talk) 11:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, reupload of previously deleted content. P 1 9 9   15:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image (youtube logo) lacks the proper copyright license. EdTre (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: fixed (you could have done this too). P 1 9 9   15:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry if I'm proposing the deletion of someone significant, but as the image is not used nor categorized I thought it might be out of scope. Is it? E4024 (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete He is płk Dariusz Chodyna, a colonel of the Polish army. Thus his picture should not be considered out of scope. However, it should be deleted as a copyvio [3] (available on the web since at least 22 July 2015). 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. P 1 9 9   15:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage without proper licensing. E4024 (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage without proper licensing. E4024 (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not Delete , Because : Yes. This Breed Diferent from Kangal : 1- Soft And Loose Skin 2- Koat Colors Black Gray and blendeld of white and black 4-dont have black masck on face 5-body anatomy like fish 6- soft and loose ears — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamad137026 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 3 May 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not address the licensing concerns. P 1 9 9   15:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Borderline case. Is the copyrighted artwork de minimis, and is the text below the threshold of originality? Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion is just standard text and a small blurred corner of a non-artistic image of the product. I would keep it. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 19:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Basilicofresco. P 1 9 9   15:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted artwork on box. Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted material. Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality out of scope Perumalism Chat 13:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cdjtv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted artwork on box. Ubcule (talk) 13:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: DM. You can't even make out the image. P 1 9 9   15:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted artwork on box. (Perhaps we can retain left hand side). Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just uploaded a cropped version: File:Sinclair ZX Spectrum 48k box (7160164308)c.jpg -- Basilicofresco (msg) 19:52, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarah.twostickers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Sarah.twostickers

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Sarah.twostickers (talk) 14:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 15:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artistic composition, overcast by direct sun. watermarks. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work, some kind of advertisement/billboard. Wdwd (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 15:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:56, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A stadium rendering, highly unlikely to be original work Ytoyoda (talk) 15:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, not original work Ytoyoda (talk) 16:00, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally published at http://jla-architecture.com/about/, needs OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 16:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamal Lamiri Alaoui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

EXIF credits Gilles TERVER/AtlasPhotos, not the uploader

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stadium rendering unlikely to be own work. Needs more source info. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely created by architect firm. P 1 9 9   15:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rendering, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 17:52, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaki CriStal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stadium renderings, unlikely to be own work

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic use: the translation of the title (cobra hunting) and a similar description (beige bench/desk cobra) show the author did not mean the photo to be used Czeva (talk) 17:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 18:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says "AP Photo/Elise Amendola" Ytoyoda (talk) 18:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:LL. P 1 9 9   16:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an AP photo, and EXIF credits San Francisco Gate: http://virginiaconservative.net/no-freedom-to-dissent/ Ytoyoda (talk) 19:00, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

family picture of an unknown football player, no educational purpose Wutsje 19:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

3 files uploaded by Rohitwithyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of three files, rather small-sized format, one rather for personal use, but all also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 20:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Not found on the internet using Google Images. P 1 9 9   16:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image à changer. Alain106 (talk) 20:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   16:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: for now. Suspicious, because image doesn't match style of this user's other uploads, but didn't find it elsewhere online using Google Images. P 1 9 9   16:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, rather small-sized one-file-upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Not found on the internet using Google Images and TinEye. P 1 9 9   16:16, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload without EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Not found on the internet using Google Images. P 1 9 9   16:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - The image has sat in "Unidentified vans" for the past 8 years and doesn't look to change, The image looks MOT related but that's a massive guess, Anyway IMHO out of scope, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Not found on the internet using Google Images. P 1 9 9   16:21, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously wrong license. No indication that the original painting depicts Safiye Sultan, probably another pseudo-identification. Phso2 (talk) 20:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je désire importer la même image mais en jpeg. Finoskov (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   16:22, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal portrait of unknown individuals - out of scope. Also, seemingly a portrait painted from a photograph, so the copyright seems highly questionable too. Themightyquill (talk) 21:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopaedic relevance. Zenwort (talk) 21:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   16:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot (http://www.kino-teatr.ru/acter/album/261492/118194.jpg), not own work, false date. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/912743605617426432/R4uY5gi0_400x400.jpg among others. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused one-file-upload without EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very low quality, little educational use. P 1 9 9   16:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor image quality, potentially outside the scope Fluorinated (talk) 23:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by Lali1080 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two unused uploads, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 23:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Not found on the internet using Google Images. P 1 9 9   16:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's google's logo, not own work, clearly a derivative. 81.131.220.124 23:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused rather small-sized upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Not found on the internet using Google Images. P 1 9 9   16:30, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:35, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A basic duplicate of File:National Assembly of Armenia 2012.svg ZYjacklin (talk) 04:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn special:diff/299468306. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Dw no source since (dw no source since) (talk) 18:06, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Info This is identical to Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Chienlit c'est lui! Support the revolutionary French students. Buy L'Enragé, their satirical journal. LCCN2015648448.jpg. So the outcomes will be identical. -- (talk) 18:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, artist is still living, no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 16:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Dw no source since (dw no source since) (talk) 18:06, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Per the LOC record, "No known restrictions on publication. Published without copyright notice." The license already on the image is correct and the sources are correct. -- (talk) 18:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@: I've already read what it is written; it's useless to repeat it. It's an 1968 work (not 1972) from French artist Jean Hillaireau (a.k.a. Hil) who is still alive so the French copyright law apply. The publication you're talking about is a DW --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC) updated --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:26, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps someone could write to Hil to check if they wanted to keep this as PD for the public benefit. -- (talk) 21:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Derivative of famous French 1968 poster by Hilaireau. Since almost all designers of May 1968 posters decline personal attribution and consider their work as collective/anonymous, will likely fall in PD 70 years after publication. — Racconish 10:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per Patrick Rogel. Author cannot be anonymous, if we know his name, so 70 years from death, not publication is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used personal file (and out of scope also because no real basis). E4024 (talk) 06:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, the form is the same, because Ankara Province has only one shape, that one. The colours are different. The Province has only one colour, purple (interestingly, and I swear, same as the shirt I wear today :). Returning to the DR'ed "map" or whatever it is, this is a "personal" file. If User:Pivox wished to use this flag or banner in their user page that could be understandable, but they did not. They just "made up" something that does not have a "real life" existence. I'm proposing the deletion of that invented map, not that of the Province (or Metropolitan city) of Ankara where I live. (Indeed I like the purple colour of that latter flag, reminds me of people who defend women's rights, like myself. :) BTW both files were uploaded by the same user. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 07:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Choi Pu Reum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio, not taken by the user. 1 is from [4], 2nd is found at [http://murutukus.kr/?p=12378, and 3rd is from 2009 and very doubtful it was taken by the uploader.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 07:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fnery99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images for for a ptwiki article which has been deleted: pt:Wikipédia:Páginas_para_eliminar/Jogo_Conclave. "Conclave" is apparently a home made / non-notable board game. I can't find any references on the Internet, so without any rules or players, the images aren't very useful.

--ghouston (talk) 07:09, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

edit of unattributed source, as are others by same editor (e.g. File:Washington_state_Therapod.png) Elmidae (talk) 07:37, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Détenteur du droit d'auteur © Philippe Weissbrodt, donc autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 07:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Détenteur du droit d'auteur Mathilda Olmi, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 07:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Link unter Quelle funktioniert nicht. Kein Hinweis auf den Fotografen. Die Datei wurde schon einmal gelöscht von Krd (talk · contribs). Verdacht auf Nutzung von Sockenpuppen. Hystrix (talk) 07:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep what are you talking about? There is both a source and an artist. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The specification of the source was changed after my deletion request. diff link. Hystrix (talk) 02:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as an upload of A3cb1 while blocked.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Admittedly, I've been uncomfortable with how we've treated this sockpuppeteer. He was originally blocked for poor sourcing/licensing and sockpuppetry. However, when his socks got their act together and started uploading only well sourced, free content, we're still mass deleting all his uploads. While I'm sympathetic to the idea that we want to discourage sockpuppetry, I think that's cutting off our nose to spite our face. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I posted about this at User talk:A3cb1#Path to unblocking.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: source, artist, and license are all good. Not a disruptive upload. P 1 9 9   14:39, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chrissymad as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.lostandfound.mu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Ali-Amel-on-Celluloid.jpg
Converted by me to DR, as this needs a bit of discussion. On its source, this image carries the note "This photo is available under the Creative Commons 3.0 license." However, it does not specify which CC license in meant. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will use the site's contact form and ask for clarification on the license. --Amy Mowatt (talk) 08:21, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The image is now a CC BY 4.0 license and they have updated the website to reflect the change from 3.0 to 4.0. --Amy Mowatt (talk) 08:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Liceense at https://www.lostandfound.mu/Ali-Amel-on-Celluloid is now CC-BY 4.0. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn (but I don't see how it is in scope...). P 1 9 9   14:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DhyaniJignesh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality No exif data

Perumalism Chat 08:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:41, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded by blocked user on frwiki (vandalism) ; no description ; unidentified subject Tractopelle-jaune (talk) 08:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Unused personal file; OoS. --E4024 (talk) 08:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny photo without metadata, bad quality, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because of very low quality. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader has problems with copyright. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by R. ORCAN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to SCSU athletics: http://www.sportsonct69.com/2017/08/michael-mallory-signs-professional.html?m=1 Ytoyoda (talk) 11:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On en.wiki, the uploader states that the photo was sent to them by Lucas Paris via Drop Box. Here at the Commons they declare it as own work. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 11:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not very credible that someone who has access to this type of material will not be able to add an English description. What's more, this image seems to be on the internet much longer than the uload date. Frankly, the other material uploaded by this user also looks a lot like copyrighted material. Dietzel65 (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Links to this image on web pages older than the upload date: on slide 10 from 2009. [5] from 2008. slide 8 from 2008. Dietzel65 (talk) 15:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No data maybe not his or here own work no cat ant small Reda Kerbouche (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. P 1 9 9   14:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits M.STIRA, relationship to uploader not explained Ytoyoda (talk) 16:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo dates back from 9th May 1977, and isn't "own" work from the uploader. Unfortunately, the URAA cut date for PD-Italy files is 1976. Ruthven (msg) 17:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work : small/middle size without EXIFs, the uploader already uploaded copyvios Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:47, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible image quality, not professional, use of amateur tools (and not even done well), and inappropriate representation of the intended material. Fluorinated (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC) If you don't agree yet, this image is flat out poor. There's a blatant watermark on one of the images, this guy has some weird obsession with celebrities, and it's made in MSpaint. It's meant to portray a school notebook's label, but has an "STD" field. What the fuck? Terrible quality on the images as well. I've went ahead and removed it from all English Wikipedia articles.[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

6 files uploaded by DSVSRK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Biswa-Kalyan-Rath.jpg nearly thumbnail format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 23:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly not own work: all inconsistent sizes, styles, and quality, obvious DW. P 1 9 9   14:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission for the depicted packaging Jcb (talk) 23:26, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://lunashoesworld.com/disenadora-nataly-mendez/

The uploader may or may not be the copyright holder, or closely connected. Guanaco (talk) 07:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: in my opinion these are utilitarian buildings, not works of art per Commons:Freedom of panorama#France. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, remplacé par une vue non marquée. Espirat (talk) 10:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, remplacé par une vue non marquée Espirat (talk) 10:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, remplacé par une vue non marquée Espirat (talk) 10:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, remplacé par une vue non marquée 86.204.4.159 10:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, remplacé par une vue non marquée 86.204.4.159 10:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, remplacé par une vue non marquée 86.204.4.159 10:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, remplacé par une vue non marquée 86.204.4.159 10:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, remplacé par une vue non marquée 86.204.4.159 10:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, remplacé par une vue non marquée 86.204.4.159 10:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo marquée, remplacée par une vue non marquée 86.204.4.159 12:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo,n marquée, remplacée par une vue non marquée Espirat (talk) 12:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo marquée, remplacée par une photo non marquée Espirat (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo marquée, remplacée par une vue non marquée Espirat (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo marquée, remplacée par une vue non marquée Espirat (talk) 12:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier marqué, sera remplaçé par l'original dès sa suppression Espirat (talk) 10:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - vous pouvez télécharger une nouvelle version avec le lien disponible directement sous l'historique du fichier. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Couldn't find its MD. Is this an "own work"? E4024 (talk) 12:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unnecesary 77.53.191.10 13:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not unnecesary, see File usage on other wikis--AlexanderRahm (talk) 09:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:32, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted artwork on box. Ubcule (talk) 13:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is just the plain low resolution reproduction of the top side of the product. It sounds strange to call it artwork. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 19:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Basilicofresco: You're probably correct that it's not "art", but that's beside the point. As far as I'm aware, legally it's still copyrightable in a similar way to actual "box art".
I know that in some European countries, the threshold of originality is higher and images such as this (which contain little sign of personal creative input) might not be copyrightable. However, as something originating in the UK that we wish to keep on Commons, it has to meet both UK and US standards for copyright. Ubcule (talk) 12:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PACKAGING. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:34, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

이미지가 잘 보이지 않아 대체 이미지 업로드 Pixelight (talk) 14:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

이미지가 잘 보이지 않아 대체 이미지 업로드 Pixelight (talk) 15:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

이미지가 잘 보이지 않아 대체 이미지 업로드 Pixelight (talk) 15:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment There's a lot of landscape in that Wiki Loves Earth image from Pakistan, and a mountain in the background. Description says "Group photo on our way back from Kandol Lake, Uthror, Swat." May it be possible to identify the mountain? And if yes - I would first check whether we have any usable images of that mountain before deletion. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:55, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say it's this mountain:
Object location35° 32′ 20″ N, 72° 28′ 44″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo
I don't know if there's a name, but it might be. The mountain lies just north of the town of Utror. The location where the image was taken is south of Utror near Kandol Lake. Here is another picture: File:Way to Paradise Kandol Lake.jpg. --Rupert Pupkin (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, other image found. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:36, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the image gallery on Bill Leverty's web site, no evidence of permission from photographer or copyright holder. Laser brain (talk) 16:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyvio, considering the other uploads by this user. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the image gallery on Bill Leverty's web site, no evidence of permission from photographer or copyright holder. Laser brain (talk) 16:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the image gallery on Bill Leverty's web site, no evidence of permission from photographer or copyright holder. Laser brain (talk) 16:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a crop of a copyrighted photo: https://www.bladi.net/maroc-fifa-coupe-monde-2026,51509.html Ytoyoda (talk) 16:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D recreation of a copyrighted 3D object Ytoyoda (talk) 16:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D recreation of a copyrighted 3D object Ytoyoda (talk) 16:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parent deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Panaadcollage.jpg. Presumably the same rationale for deletion applies to the crop; if this is a crop. (talk) 16:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clubi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works, note that two were grabbed from facebook ("FBMD")

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I realize Alamy has a poor track record, but this suggests the photo is not original work made on May 1, 2018: https://www.alamy.pt/foto-imagem-a-foto-mostra-o-paquistanes-de-campo-internacional-hockey-player-muhammad-saqlain-em-accao-durante-o-jogo-contra-a-alemanha-no-hamburg-masters-2006-em-hamburgo-na-alemanha-sexta-feira-25-de-agosto-de-2006-a-alemanha-perdeu-12-foto-sebastian-widmann-53961120.html Ytoyoda (talk) 18:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considering the username it may be a photo of the uploader; it is unlikely the uploader took his own professional studio portrait photo; the file is found on several websites such as this. Need info about the photographer and permission to license their photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader attributes the photo to this professional photographer, whose copyright information is also in the metadata. Need permission from that photographer to license his copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:42, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional singer headshot with copyright information in the metadata: "Author: Johan Meijrs, Copyright holder: MediaRakker." This does not appear to be the uploader, requires permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:42, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Alx.alexandre

[edit]

The first two have "Author: Felipe Moraes, Copyright holder: Felipe Moraes" in the metadata, the third has the name of a different photographer watermarked right on the image. The uploader can't be both people and is probably neither. Need permission from the photographers. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably not own work - seeː http://www.lotusinfra.net/commercial-projects - the same visualisation of the planned building, no info on the author. Oo91 (talk) 20:09, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the picture on the left which is probably not own work by original uploader. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No! It is picture from user Sahara. He is source. Picture is his own work. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 22:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What's your base for that claim? Jcb (talk) 22:28, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I know it user. And I can be sure to it is his own work. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 04:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How do you 'know' this? Jcb (talk) 06:10, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD in Russia until 2019 (see COM:CRT#Russia and former Soviet Union) Sealle (talk) 21:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not PD in RU, then delete the image in Russian pages on Wikipedia. In this case, the tag "PD-old-70-1996" fits perfectly: if the law in the country provides the different terms (specifically Russia 70+4 years) it is a special case. But the rest should not be discriminated.--Armenius vambery (talk) 14:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Familiarize yourself with Commons:Licensing: Uploads of non-U.S. works are normally allowed only if the work is either in the public domain or covered by a valid free license in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work. Sealle (talk) 15:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Correct explanation, based on the US copyright office interpretation, discussed with you at least three times. No need to repeat. Russia and Ukraine are not the same countries. The image is PD free in Ukraine and other countries with 70 years rule (all f-USSR but Russia) and US. Since Russia is the special case (70+4 years) then treat it as such. To spread the special case to all countries is not correct. You need to show the respect to people who restored the image with high historical value. --Armenius vambery (talk) 03:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We need more information if Mikhail Kalashnikov had work in Ukraine or Russia 128.68.86.34 18:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Impractical: how many images we should remove and restore 1 year later because of potential extreme edge cases nobody can prove? 128.68.86.34 18:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: undelete in 2019. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potentially personality right isusses, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to assume this is non-free. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 11:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to assume a personality rights violation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date. Can be found (with private acess) at https://psacunion.ca/user/login?destination=node/2498 Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/korean-dramusic/images/9/96/Kim-hyun-joong.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20151023222441&path-prefix=pt-br Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Smithsonian is somewhat independent of the US Government, and some of its works aren't PD. Likewise, even standard parts of the US government can hold copyrights transfered it. Moreover, physical possession of the mural does not transfer copyright; Jay Matternes may well have kept copyright.

I do not know who owns the copyright; it's possible it lost copyright through failure to have proper notice or renewal. It seems not unlikely the work is copyrighted by the artist or the copyright is owned by the Smithsonian, however, and the image page lacks nearly enough information to establish one way or the other.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that one of the licenses would apply. Jcb (talk) 22:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jarmo Loikkanen uses this photo as cover to his book ”Kaarlo Kivekäs – kolmen armeijan kenraali”. He could know the source of this photo. Or the source could be found in that book. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 08:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear copyright situation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:37, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Stated "owner" seems to be one of the depicted people rather than the photographer. Jcb (talk) 22:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license, even if there would be evidence for anonymous publication (which is not provided), 70 years have not passed since 1963. Jcb (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jcb, this file is provided by the State Archives of the Republic of Macedonia (DARM), Skopje Department, in collaboration with Wikipedian in Residence. There is an information about the source. Regards, - Violetova (talk) 09:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If there is a valid permission, please make sure we receive this at OTRS. Also the file has no valid license, Anonymous-EU can only be used if the file was published over 70 years ago, which is impossible in this case, and it is een anonymous work (which is not the same as 'we don't know who the author was), which is not demonstrated. Jcb (talk) 09:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are right about anonymous and 'we don't know who the author was'. The second is true for this photo, and it was my mistake, I choose the wrong license. Regards, - Violetova (talk) 20:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2 files uploaded by Aravind9909 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

two unused files missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 23:02, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sizes are consistent, EXIF is consistent with upload via Google. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

thumbnail format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 23:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

comment: see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DSVSRK, Roland zh (talk) 23:26, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: from Facebook. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]