Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
5.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Chapple.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
{{copyvio|Given the other uploads of this user I doubt that they produced all these different songs themselves and own the rights. For this very song, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w-p72voWbM }} Malyacko (talk) 14:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
{{copyvio|Given the other uploads of this user I doubt that they produced all these different songs themselves and own the rights.}} Malyacko (talk) 14:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
{{copyvio|Given the other uploads of this user I doubt that they produced all these different songs themselves and own the rights.}} Malyacko (talk) 14:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
{{copyvio|Given the other uploads of this user I doubt that they produced all these different songs themselves and own the rights.}} Malyacko (talk) 14:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
{{copyvio|Given the other uploads of this user I doubt that they produced all these different songs themselves and own the rights.}} Malyacko (talk) 14:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
{{copyvio|Obviously the uploader is not the copyright holder}} Malyacko (talk) 14:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
corrupt file? Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: corrupt file, no content. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edgarpossas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – uploaded by a Wikipedia Zero abuser, no essential information. --jdx Re: 16:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope - Does not look educationally useful in itself and the user page sounds like self-promotion of a publishing house Malyacko (talk) 14:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope - Does not look educationally useful in itself and the user page sounds like self-promotion of a publishing house Malyacko (talk) 14:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope - Does not look educationally useful in itself and the user page sounds like self-promotion of a publishing house Malyacko (talk) 14:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- This is not only self-promotion. The user seems to be mistaking their user page for a web shop. --87.150.3.137 15:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Publicity. E4024 (talk) 15:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted by clément alloing, not Vnk414 Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 15:06, 2 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: see image tags --Krdbot 18:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful Malyacko (talk) 14:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – uploaded by a Wikipedia Zero abuser. --jdx Re: 19:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Droits d'auteurs, image issue d'un clip Heather.Ruby (talk) 23:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Qualifies for speedy deletion as a derivative of this video clip. --De728631 (talk) 01:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
unused template Jarekt (talk) 13:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Confirmed,
Delete. --Achim (talk) 18:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused template - recreate when needed. --Jarekt (talk) 11:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Musicpage.com 141.196.217.10 21:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Hystrix at 23:49, 2 Oktober 2017 UTC: Out of project scope (personal image) and / or COM:ADVERT - --Krdbot 06:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
unused template Jarekt (talk) 13:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- take it away --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Confirmed, not a dupe of and not to be confused with Creator:Gottfried Hempel. --Achim (talk) 17:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 13:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richard Crowe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:Richard Crowe naked 18.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 16.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 17.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe 15.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 14.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 13.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 12.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 11.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 10.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 7.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 8.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 9.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 6.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 4.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 5.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 3.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 1.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 2.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richard Crowe (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete all Commons is not snapchat... Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richard Crowe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (12).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (10).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (11).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (9).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (7).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (8).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (6).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (5).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (4).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (2).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (3).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, black and white (1).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, standing, hotel 07.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, seated, hotel 05.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, seated, hotel 04.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, seated, hotel 06.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, seated, hotel 03.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, seated, hotel 01.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked, seated, hotel 02.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 60.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 59.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 43.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 41.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 42.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 40.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 39.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 38.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 37.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 36.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 35.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 34.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 33.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 32.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 31.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 30.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 28.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 29.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 27.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 25.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 26.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 24.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 23.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 22.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 21.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 20.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 50.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 49.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 48.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 47.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 15.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 44.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 46.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 45.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 09.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 06.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 08.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 07.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 05.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 04.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 03.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 02.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe naked 01.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe, nude, frontal, acrylic.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe, nude, frontal, acrylic 2.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe, nude, frontal, pen and ink.jpg
- File:RICHARD CROWE naked with body hair.jpg
- File:RICHARD CROWE naked without body hair.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- I warned the user to stop uploading this kind of content. At least to stop as long the nominations are not closed, and to stop permanently if the files are not kept. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ihsan Podgorica (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ihsan Podgorica (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence of permission.
Wikicology (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Likely a copyright violation, also a PDF text which is outside the project scope. Guanaco (talk) 01:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Cover seems to be modern. What are dates of life of author? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation SDKmac (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- The claim "own work" can obviously be true only if the uploader is identical with the author of the picture, which does not seem likely and would be up to him to prove.
- The picture might in fact be o.k. for press use, as this website claims ("Alle Fotos sind für die Veröffentlichung in den Print- und Onlinemedien freigegeben."), but does that mean it has a CC license? --87.150.3.137 14:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
15:11, 2 October 2017 Jcb (A) deleted page File:ANTIHELD Presse 01 © Viktor Schanz klein.jpg (Commons:Deletion requests/File:ANTIHELD Presse 01 © Viktor Schanz klein.jpg: Possible copyright violation) --DCB (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fathibaity (talk · contribs)
[edit]University course and non-trivial logos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Agronomie Emploi du temps Provisoire.pdf
- File:Introduction-a-la-zoologie.pdf
- File:Introduction a la microbio alim ah 2013 2014.pdf
- File:Biochimie alimentaire.pdf
- File:Biologie - Emploi du temps Provisoire.pdf
- File:UE BALI-1.pdf
- File:UeBCA107.pdf
- File:Département de Biologie.pdf
- File:Département des Sciences Agronomiques et Vétérinaires.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fathibaity (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability.
- File:Resumer biochimie les glucides (L2 SNV.png
- File:Emploi de temp de science nature snv.jpeg.jpg
- File:Emploi temp.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fathibaity (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Stolen from here; copyright tag at bottom was removed by uploader. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 00:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
poor quality photo, no foreseeable encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
personal image - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
personal photo - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
personal photo - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlos Llanos Manzano (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: advertising or self-promotion, only in use on the user page of a user without useful contribution to the project.
- File:Novia Fallecida De Carlos Llanos .jpg
- File:Actor,Cantante,Modelo Carlos Llanos .jpg
- File:Actor,Modelo,Cantante Carlos Llanos.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 12:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlos Llanos Manzano (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal photos - out of project scope
- File:Carlos Llanos Y Su Hermano 2014 .jpg
- File:Rincón Juvenil De Carlos Llanos .png
- File:Carlos Y Su Hermana .jpg
- File:Carlos Llanos Finalizando el Año.jpg
- File:Actor Cantante Modelo Carlos Llanos.jpg
- File:Artista Venezolano .jpg
- File:Carlos Llanos 2017 .jpg
- File:Carlos Llanos 2015 .jpg
- File:Rincón Presidencial 2016 .png
- File:Presidente De Los Guerripson De Venezuela.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. Self-proclamated singer, but without career. --Taichi (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment Also include files uploaded by Guerripson De Venezuela (talk · contribs), an obvious sockpuppet of Carlos Llanos Manzano. Also, he believes is a parallel president of Venezuela, or something...
- File:Presidente De Los Guerripson De Venezuela Desde 2016 .jpg
- File:Bandera De Los Guerripson De Venezuela .jpg
- File:Logo Presidencial De La Presidencia De Los Guerripson De Venezuela 2016-2022.png
- File:Presidente DE Los Guerripson.jpg
- File:Carlos Llanos Renuncio .jpg
- File:Bandera de Los Guerripson.jpg
- File:Logo de el Gobierno de El Presidente Carlos Llanos .png
- Delete per Taichi Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused image of unknown people Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Commons is not a personal file webhost, out of project scope
- File:DJ Zarkin Offiial Logo.png
- File:Poolside Party with DJ Zarkin.jpg
- File:DJ Zarkin with ICC Indian Cricket Coach John Write.jpg
- File:DJ Zarkin in Shwedagon Pagoda.jpg
- File:Walking on the street.jpg
- File:DJ Zarkin as chief guest at Kolkata Bookfair.jpg
- File:DJ zarkin with his car.jpg
- File:Dj Zarkin On stage 2.jpg
- File:Dj Zarkin In Tantra Kolkata.jpg
- File:A little fun.jpg
- File:Photoshoot of DJ Zarkin.jpg
- File:Dj Zarkin On stage 3.jpg
- File:DJ Zarkin - Busy In studio.jpg
- File:Dj Zarkin On stage 1.jpg
- File:Picture Of Dj Zarkin.jpg
- File:Dj Zarkin On stage.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
PDF CV; outside the Project scope Guanaco (talk) 03:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 03:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 03:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GHODAKE.JEET (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Abhijeet Ghodake 3.jpg
- File:Abhijeet Ghodake 6.jpg
- File:Abhijeet Ghodake 4.jpg
- File:Abhijeet Ghodake 11.jpg
Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ekonkarseries (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Not useful for the project. The watermark advertises somerthing. Ruthven (msg) 07:36, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
no educational value Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abu Taher Ahmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
private vacation pic Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asimbahweg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album.
- File:Des jeunes en situation delicate.jpg
- File:Deux jeunes amoureux.jpg
- File:Une femme avec un bidon 2.jpg
- File:Gratien Asimbahwe au village2.jpg
- File:Gratien Asimbahwe au village.jpg
- File:Deux jeunes cineastes au village.jpg
- File:Bujumbura en beaute 2.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 09:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
advertising for "Biergarten Bürg Rötteln" Alabasterstein (talk) 09:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused and non-standard template, possibly redundant to Template:Low quality. Gapfall (talk) 11:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: per above. --Achim (talk) 19:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MoisesEliazerBalladares (talk · contribs)
[edit]Selfies, unused
seb26 (talk) 12:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Seems empty image, not working Elly (talk) 12:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: corrupt file. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ritlal kumar mandal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album.
- File:Ritlal mandal (delhi mall).jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal (delhi 1).jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal (giridih).jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal photo 2.jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal photo 1.jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal in (sister marriage).jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal mom.jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal khutababa mandir.jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal khuta baba 3.jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal khuta baba 2.jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal khuta baba.jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal (village).jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal & Rajesh mandal.jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal in office.jpg
- File:Ritlal mandal.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 12:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I looked around for Patrick Oluyide in internet but did not see much other than social media. If he may have an article some day, please stop me, if not let's go ahead with this DR. E4024 (talk) 13:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
low-quality personal images of pets, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Apparently uploaded for use in en:Maiyanbu, which has been deleted for lack of notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Not sure if there's any connection to the previous file uploaded under the same name and the associated sockpuppetry. Also: "google image" is not a verifiable source. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Again, unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deepak Sawakhande (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope; unused personal image.
- File:Deepak Sawakhande on set just mitre.JPG
- File:Deepak Sawakhande with BP team.jpg
- File:Aadesh powar of Law Deepak Sawakhande.jpg
- File:Deepak Sawakhande on set aadesh.jpg
- File:Director Deepak Sawakhande.jpg
Hystrix (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Commons is not Myspace Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by José Antonio Columbie Alfonso (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope; unused personal images.
Hystrix (talk) 20:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thegboss11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image
Hystrix (talk) 20:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
--Sapphiremind (talk) 20:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC) Image previously used, now updated. Can be deleted, it's not a great photo. Though neither was the photo there before ;)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
non free logo; copy from http://somoysangbad.com/ Aftab (talk) 14:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 16:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 20:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akash M. Deshmukh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:NOTUSED: Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills
- File:Manipulation (13).jpg
- File:Manipulation (10).jpg
- File:Manipulation (12).jpg
- File:Manipulation (9).jpg
- File:Manipulation (5).jpg
- File:Manipulation (6).jpg
- File:Manipulation (8).jpg
- File:Manipulation (2).jpg
- File:Manipulation (1).jpg
- File:Manipulation (3).jpg
- File:New pic. (1).jpg
- File:New pic. (2).jpg
Takeaway (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akash M. Deshmukh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:DSC 22521sx.jpg
- File:DSC 09761as.jpg
- File:Monochrom1.jpg
- File:Edited1.jpg
- File:Road kill snakes.jpg
- File:AAkash.jpg
- File:Akash Deshmukh.......deshmukh.jpg
- File:Akash Deshmukh.. Lohar.jpg
- File:Akash deshmukh akash.jpg
- File:Akash Deshmukh..Akkii.jpg
- File:New pic. (3).jpg
- File:Ak pen.jpg
- File:AkashDeshmukh.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jimbo808637 (talk · contribs)
[edit]More dick pics with no intention or possibility of being used on a project. COM:PENIS.
- File:My Lubricated, heavily Masturbated 7" Erect Penis.jpg
- File:Semi Hard Circumsized penis, about to masturbate.jpg
- File:HARD erect wet penis with homemade Cock ring.jpg
- File:Masturbating with flacid Penis.jpg
- File:Semi erect beginning to masturbate with no lube.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- THERE ARE PICTURES QUITE SIMILAR TO MINE! I JUST DONT GET IT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbo808637 (talk • contribs) 12:03, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pubali Halder (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope; unused personal images.
Hystrix (talk) 22:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope; unused personal image. Hystrix (talk) 22:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused artwork of a selfie, also at instagram. Achim (talk) 11:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Likely self-promotion; any such text could also be added as text and not in an image Malyacko (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of WLM Scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
personal image - out of project scope, no permission Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
photo of a person, not a monument photo LZia (WMF) (talk) 21:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Possibly professional celebrity image with no EXIF from new uploader, questionable "own work" claim. Other uploads (2 on Commons, 1 on en-Wiki) have been copyright violations from various social media sources. Delete per COM:PCP, unless the image's origin can be clarified. GermanJoe (talk) 02:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
low-res version of File:Ampola Durateston.jpg Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be uploader's own work. Image already appears at http://www.abidenews.com/stop-criticizing-ofori-amponsah-and-pray-for-him-daddy-lumba/ NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - " © Copyright 2015 AbideNews · Designed by MenyoTech ". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikkihoneywell (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:Oregon Ducks Cheerleader Nikki.jpg
- File:Nikki Honeywell High School Cheerleader.jpg
- File:Cheerleader Practice Nikki Honeywell.jpg
- File:Nicolette Honeywell.jpg
- File:Fiesta Bowl.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarkedMan666 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader cites different authors in these files, no evidence that any of these authors have given permission for their work to be licensed as they are here.
- File:JeremyPetrachonis3.jpg
- File:"Eliminate The Hate".jpg
- File:"Dare To Defy".jpg
- File:Jeremy Petrachonis 2.jpg
- File:Jeremy Petrachonis 1.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarkedMan666 (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal images, out of project scope
- File:JeremyPetrachonis Twindows.jpg
- File:JeremyPetrachonis Series.jpg
- File:JeremyPetrachonic Movie.jpg
- File:JeremyPetrachonis Comic.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also several of them infringe on the copyrights for the tee shirts. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarkedMan666 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Per FBMD grabbed from facebook
- File:A bela arquitetura.jpg
- File:A Beleza da Arquitetura da Igreja do Carmo.jpg
- File:A imponência da Igreja do Carmo.jpg
- File:Altar da Igreja da Ordem Primeira do Carmo.jpg
- File:Basílica de Nossa Senhora Aparecida1.jpg
- File:Beco em Olinda, Rua de São Bento.jpg
- File:Bike comum visto encostada virou lembrança ao olha-la.jpg
- File:Brasilia Catedral.jpg
- File:Cabo Frio RJ.jpg
- File:Casa em Olinda 1.jpg
- File:Casa em Olinda 2.jpg
- File:Casa em Olinda 3.jpg
- File:Casa em Olinda 4.jpg
- File:Catedral Angelopolitana - em diferente enfoque.jpg
- File:Catedral Angelopolitana - sob o sol missioneiro.jpg
- File:Centro Histórico Natividade.jpg
- File:Cidade Alta de Olinda com Recife ao fundo.jpg
- File:Conjunto arquitetônico Paraty Ruas Coloridas.jpg
- File:Conjunto Urbano Cidade Amparo SP, Brasil Vista do Morro do Cristo.jpg
- File:Conjunto Urbano Jardim Adélia Amparo SP Brasil. Vista panôramica.jpg
- File:Convento de São Francisco, interior 1.jpg
- File:Convento de São Francisco, interior 2.jpg
- File:Convento de São Francisco, interior 3.jpg
- File:Convento de São Francisco, interior 4.jpg
- File:Convento de São Francisco, interior 5.jpg
- File:Convento de São Francisco, interior 6.jpg
- File:Cristo Redentor de Serra Negra SP. Brasil.jpg
- File:Detalhes de Tiradentes.jpg
- File:Diamantina - Vista da Casa da Chica da Silva.jpg
- File:Elegância e Religiosidade.jpg
- File:Escola de Samba GRES Preto Velho, Olinda.jpg
- File:Festa do Carmo sendo preparada.jpg
- File:Forte das Cinco Pontas, pátio interno.jpg
- File:Forte das Cinco Pontas.jpg
- File:Forte de Santo Antônio.jpg
- File:Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosário - Foto Direta.jpg
- File:Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Rosário, e respectivas imagens e alfaias anoite.jpg
- File:Igreja de Santa Rita, e respectivas imagens e alfaias com rua alagada.jpg
- File:Igreja de São Francisco de Assis.jpg
- File:Igreja de São Francisco de Paula - costas.jpg
- File:Igreja do Bonfim vista do Museu de Arte Sacra da UFBA.jpg
- File:Igreja Matriz de Nossa Senhora dos Remédios Reflexo.jpg
- File:Igreja Matriz de São Francisco do Sul, Santa Catarina, Brasil.jpg
- File:Interior do Santuário.jpg
- File:Luz Divina iluminando a Igreja do Carmo e a Natureza.jpg
- File:Mais um fim de tarde na Província BUzios.jpg
- File:Marina das Barcas.jpg
- File:O belíssimo centro histórico - São Francisco do Sul, Santa Catarina, Brasil.jpg
- File:O charme do Casarão do Valongo - Santos, São Paulo, Brasil.jpg
- File:Pacobaiba 02.jpg
- File:Panorâmica Parque Lage.jpg
- File:Pátio do Colégio 2015.jpg
- File:Rotina e Fé.jpg
- File:Rua de São Bento, Olinda.jpg
- File:Selva de pedra em cabo frio.jpg
- File:Serra Negra SP Brasil.jpg
- File:Serra Negra SP, Brasil.jpg
- File:Serro - Vista Panorâmica.jpg
- File:TJPE.jpg
- File:Toque na luz.jpg
- File:Uma visão do Museu Nacional do Mar - São Francisco do Sul, Santa Catarina, Brasil.jpg
- File:Veja a cabo frio em pixels.jpg
- File:Vista do Forte das Cinco Pontas com Igreja Matriz de São José ao fundo.jpg
- File:Vista lateral do prédio da Bolsa do Café, Santos, São Paulo, Brasil.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 03:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Facebook images are not free. In order to restore any of these, the actual copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
sourced to US gov but has no link to exact source Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
possible copyvio - maybe a screenshot or scan? Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 04:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Book cover. CC license seems very unlikely. 87.150.3.137 06:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Book cover. CC license seems very unlikely. 87.150.3.137 06:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Pobably not own work (low resolution and no exif) Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Just curious: How does "low resolution" and "no exif" translate to "probably not own work"? --87.150.3.137 07:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's probably coming from Googles Images.Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- That is certainly possible. But is it more than guesswork? I can easily turn any of my pictures into "low resolution and no exif". As a matter of fact, all my pre-digital era images are low resolution and no exif. --87.150.3.137 14:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- I tried a Google image search, and Google could not find an identical image. But then, I am not really an expert at using Google image search, so I may have missed something. --87.150.3.137 20:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's probably coming from Googles Images.Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 14:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: It is up to the uploader to prove beyond a significant doubt that the image is his work or is freely licensed. When there is no camera EXIF or when the image is small, it is more likely than not that it is not, in fact, the uploader's own work -- it is a rebuttable resumption -- if the uploader had commented here, this might not have been deleted. However, this particular image has EXIF beginning with "FBMD" which shows that it was lifted from Facebook. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 07:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vicomtesse2017 (talk · contribs)
[edit]
VIGNERON (talk) 07:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused redirect, {{Infobox officeperson}} has already been deleted. Achim (talk) 08:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused and useless template. Achim (talk) 08:18, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I don't know if Saba Rad is a TV presenter, reporter or similar, but she has several unused images here. Either categorize her (and hopefully find an article in some WP) or delete those files.. E4024 (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 08:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep Keep. If you're not using the file in TR:WP, I'm sure that when he gets famous in a couple of years you'l be adding a "photo needed" tag to his article. What is the problem with young actors? (Let me tell you more openly, I was the champion of asking the deletion of their articles in TR:WP; but one thing is waiting a reasonable time to accept a young actor as "notable", because he has yet taken part only in on or two films or theatre plays, the other is destroying "documents"! When he is "more" notable who will run after the famous guy for a pic? You?) If you see a copyright violation etc write your reasoning in that sense. "Out of project"? You mean "out of project scope". He's not. --E4024 (talk) 08:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: There are thousands of young actors who might become famous -- we can deal with the very few that do become famous when and if it happens. More to the point, this image is claimed to be "own work" of the subject. Since it does not appear to be a selfie, it is a copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar) as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copy of Fig. 2 in this article. The contributor very likely did create the image but its copyright is owned by Elsevier. Is the image eligible for copyright? Discussion is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- My apologies if speedy wasn't the right option; I don't spend much time in Commons. It seems open and shut to me. The image is a copy of Fig. 2 in an article in the Journal of Geochemical Exploration, which is one of the Elsevier journals. From what I know of Elsevier, I would be very surprised indeed if it handed over the rights. RockMagnetist (DCO visiting scholar) (talk) 14:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- I believe, that no rights have been handed over. But if there's no rights at all, then there's no need to hand over the rights. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: A simple graph of factual data has no copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
براي شركت در مسابقه ميخواستم قرار بدم اشباهي اينجا گذاشتم Saeidjeybari (talk) 08:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
حذف بفرماييد Saeidjeybari (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Not a userpage but an article, out of scope. Looks like a backup of en:User:M9569489440. Achim (talk) 08:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Uploader has problems with copyright, the photo is found thousand times in Internet. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted material X-Javier (talk) 09:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. I suspect, that the logo is at least once deleted before. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan. The building was erected in 2009 (per https://www.zakon.kz/4462695-centralnaja-mechet-taraza-khibatulla-at.html) and the photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work. Unknown copyright status Discasto talk 10:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- It´s right. I uploaded some pictures and i didn´t think about the copyright status. Delete
OK Thanks (Gracias Discasto por tu tiempo). Vanbasten 23 (talk) 10:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- also redirect file:Atlant logor.gif
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Beatriz Sousa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per FBMD grabbed from facebook
- File:"Aquele que tanto se preocupa com a beleza, encontra-se na transparência,como aquele vidro com um lindo rótolo,porém sem nenhum conteúdo.".jpg
- File:"Quando as palavras fogem, as flores falam.".jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Bravo TV channel isn't mentioned neither in en:Bravo (disambiguation), ru.wiki nor in ro.wiki. Probably the channel is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
All main subjects are blurry. Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Blurred, watermarked image. Not reasonably usable for educational purpose, thus OOS. Ruthven (msg) 10:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Hkskgroup (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Alejandro Tinoco (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Alekhya.06 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except 3 userpages (all in sa.wiki) and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpages. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Alekribet (talk · contribs) made userpage in pt.wiki and uploaded a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. His only other edit was vandalism and reverted. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
David Aleandro (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Revista Cultural Sub-Urbano isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Logo of non-notable thing, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
A vague and non-standard template ("This gallery needs to be improved.") currently only being used apparently in error, on three non-gallery image files. Gapfall (talk) 11:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Not useful nor in use on any gallery. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Was not well instructed Asimbahweg (talk) 11:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
The image appears to have been added to promote Envoy Textiles on the Supply chain management Wikipedia page (this was quickly removed so the image is not now linked anywhere). Attempts by this user to create Wikipedia pages for Envoy Textiles and Envoy Group were also deleted --Nzd (talk) 11:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image. User does not react on talk page on NL Wikipedia Elly (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - On the other side: © AUTEURSRECHT DE NEDERLANDSCHE BANK NV - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image. User does not react on talk page on NL Wikipedia Elly (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
The copyright holder of the works is "YGP". Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team.
- File:Dancer at the ciciba for the tournament of the 9 provinces of Gabon.jpg
- File:Traditional group at the CICIBA for the tournament of the 9 provinces of Gabon.jpg
- File:Traditional singer at the tournament of the 9 provinces of Gabon.jpg
- File:Traditional african therapist 2.jpg
- File:Traditional african therapist at the tournament of the 9 provinces of Gabon 2.jpg
- File:Traditional african therapist at the tournament of the 9 provinces of Gabon.jpg
- File:Traditional african therapist 3.jpg
- File:Traditional african therapist.jpg
- File:African Dancer at the tournament of the 9 provinces of Gabon 2.jpg
- File:African Dancer at the tournament of the 9 provinces of Gabon 3.jpg
- File:African Dancer at the tournament of the 9 provinces of Gabon.jpg
- File:Central serous retinopathy 2.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Commercial posters inside. Solomon203 (talk) 14:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Notre-Dame de Royan
[edit]- File:Cathédrale Notre-Dame - panoramio.jpg
- File:Royan Stahlbetonkirche Notre Dame de Royan 45x22x60 m 1955-58 Foto Wolfgang Pehlemann DSC08638.jpg
- File:Royan-Eglise Notre-Dame.jpg
VIGNERON (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Notre-Dame de Royan
[edit]See also/voir aussi :
- File:Intérieur de l'Eglise ND de Royan, bas-côté droit.jpg
- File:Intérieur de l'Eglise ND de Royan, dans l'axe de la nef.jpg
- File:L'Autel et le vitrail principal de l'Eglise ND de Royan.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, déambulatoire nord.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, déambulatoire sud à deux niveaux.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, déambulatoires à deux niveaux.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, détail architectural de l'escalier sud du déambulatoire.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, détail d'un vitrail du déambulatoire.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, détail des vitraux du déambulatoire inférieur nord, emmaüs.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, détail des vitraux du déambulatoire inférieur nord, la cène.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, détail des vitraux du déambulatoire inférieur nord.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, détail des vitraux sud.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, entrée et cage d'escalier.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, entrée principale ouest.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, escalier côté sur de l'entrée principale.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, vue de l'autel et des vitraux du choeur.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, vue de la nef depuis l'entrée.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, vue des vitraux nord.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, vue du baptistère.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, vue du choeur depuis le sud.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan, vue du choeur.jpg
- File:Église Notre-Dame de Royan.jpg
VIGNERON (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RedLiquorice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from movie poster. Should be blanked/cropped to keep.
- File:DIG13743-130 (16682541394).jpg
- File:DIG13743-115 (17117280008).jpg
- File:DIG13743-112 (16682595234).jpg
- File:DIG13743-103 (17118863769).jpg
- File:DIG13743-065 (17305366475).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
The original in French is in the public domain, but the Spanish translation might not be. In same places, there is also a right for the publisher. Who is the translator? Who is the publisher? When and where was it published?
Yann (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1LYHeTVIAE49Y6.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope - unclear what is shown on the image and data could be presented in a table anyway. Malyacko (talk) 14:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- The French WP uses it and explains what is shown: "Chronologie des ouvertures de bureaux Roland Berger à travers le monde". Agree that this kind of image is more for a company brochure than for WP; we don't really need an image for that kind of information. Plus, copyright seems doubtful to me. The author claims "Travail personnel" - ? --87.150.3.137 20:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://dz323zad72hoh.cloudfront.net/media/documents/imagenes/BSC-Campeon.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Albeiror24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from photos.
- File:Parents of Mgr Joseph Chhmar Salas.jpg
- File:Mgr Joseph Chhmar Salas.jpg
- File:Father Marcel Truong Sang Samroni.jpg
- File:Father Joseph Chmar Salem.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
There is not a measurable reason of why these files should be deleted. They belong to the modern Cambodian history as these persons were victims of the Khmer Rouge Regime. This is, therefore, a very important material. Thanks. --AlbeiroR24 (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: They may be important, but they are all copyright violations. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Malkawi99 (file cropper, exif manipulator, Panoramio etc. grabber). Living examples: File:بركة العرائس 1.jpg (11.06.2016, photoshopped & cropped) --> https://www.facebook.com/363561470403282/photos/a.363564557069640.91002.363561470403282/1028293743930048/?type=3&theater (04.2016, © by "Ahmad Thyabat Photography") + File:بركة العرائس 4.jpg (11.06.2016) --> (watermark removed) https://www.facebook.com/363561470403282/photos/a.363564557069640.91002.363561470403282/990474241045332/?type=3&theater (02.2016, © by "Ahmad Thyabat Photography"). See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:بركة العرايس في إربد.jpg
- File:بركة العرائس بجانب نهر اليرموك.jpg
- File:بركة العرائس 10.jpg
- File:بركة العرائس 4.jpg
- File:بركة العرائس 1.jpg
- File:بركة العرائس 3.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 09:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:10, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Too big collection for user page.
- File:عارف محمد العلي الملكاوي.jpg
- File:عارف محمد ملكاوي.jpg
- File:Al.Malkawi Aref.jpg
- File:Aref Mohammad Malkawi - University Of Jordan.jpg
- File:UMS المدرسة النموذجية — الجامعة الأردنية.jpg
- File:Al-Malkawi Aref.jpg
- File:عارف محمد الملكاوي.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:وصفي التل مع أحمد أبو قورة عام 1931.jpg
- File:وصفي التل عام 1946.jpg
- File:الملك حسين ودوله الشهيد وصفي التل.jpg
- File:صورة لوصفي التل عام 1945.png
- File:وصفي التل في يوليو 1971.jpg
- File:وصفي التل قبل اغتياله بلحظات.jpg
- File:وصفي التل في جامعة الدول العربية.jpg
- File:جنازة شهيد الأمة وصفي التل.jpg
- File:وصفي التل.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 01:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Louise Horder Mc. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and [paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Percy Richard Morley Horder.jpg
- File:Portrait of Percy Richard Morley Horder.jpg
- File:Percy Morley Horder2.jpg
- File:Percy Morley Horder.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Sorry - mea culpa. I was attempting to submit some photos to the Wiki Loves Monuments project, including three I had previously uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The form came back with the message that the file I had tried to attach was identical to an existing photo, and asked whether to delete it. It was unclear whether it meant delete from the Monuments submission or delete entirely - I guessed wrong, and pressed delete. This photo was taken by me, there is no copyright issue, I do not wish to remove it from Wikimedia Commons. There are two other photos that may have been affected in the same way - Stornoway-Rockcliffe.jpg and Stone Circle.jpg. All these photos were taken by me, and I don't wish to delete any of them. They are used in the Rockcliffe Park, Ontario article. Apologies for causing problems, and thanks for fixing things. Anna Litickle (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i0.wp.com/terradomandu.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/POUSO-ALEGRE-EMPREGOS.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Scratch trademarks
[edit]As per section 5.4 of the Scratch Terms of Use, they retain the rights to the "Scratch Cat"
- File:'סקראטץ.png
- File:Graphical Effects.png
- File:Scratch cat large.png
- File:Scratch Cat.png
- File:Scratch Logo.png
- File:Scratch project deleted.png
- File:Scratch Screenshot, Stage.gif
- File:Scratch Screenshot, Stage2.gif
- File:Scratch Wiki Logo.png
- File:ScratchCat-Large.png
- File:Scratchcat.svg
- File:ScratchChiste.ogv
- File:ScratchClaveDeSon.ogv
- File:Slash Cat.png
- File:Toc website scratch.png
Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's probably worth adding a small note to {{Cc-by-sa-2.0-Scratch}} indicating that they do retain full rights to certain works. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Interview 16 October 1957 of Dale Whittaker and Wesley B. Harding re Sputnik-1 observations with recording of the satellite.wav
[edit]Recording by a commercial radio station; not a work of the US government. —howcheng {chat} 16:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
I have no idea how to enter a response. Let's see if this works. I found this tape in my father's effects. Why not contact the radio station and see if they have any objection. Wikimedia can decide. It has historical value, so I'll get it posted elsewhere.
- It's not a question of whether they mind or not. What we need to know is, is it still under copyright (and it might not be anymore; it would have had to been renewed in 1980)? If yes, then the station would have to change the licensing to a free license. If they didn't renew the copyright, then we are good. But it's your upload, so you would need to do the research. —howcheng {chat} 17:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Parliament members by Parikas
[edit]These photos are by Parikas per respective archive database entries or per superscription. So copyright hasn't expired.
- File:Karl August Baars.jpg [1]
- File:Walter von Pezold.jpg (superscription "PARIKAS")
- File:Mart Kiirats.jpg [2]
- File:Karl Ast.jpg [3]
- File:Anton Palvadre.jpg [4]
- File:Mihkel Martna.jpg [5]
- File:Karl Ipsberg.jpg [6]
- File:Oskar Amberg.jpg [7]
- File:Lui Olesk.jpg [8]
- File:Aleksander Oinas.jpg [9]
- File:Hans Pöhl.jpg [10]
- File:Juhan Kukk.jpg [11]
--90.191.76.154 17:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- File:AaduBirk.jpg [12]
- File:JüriJaakson.jpg [13]
- File:Herr Pöhl.jpg [14]
- File:Ado Anderkopp.jpg [15]
- File:August Kerem.jpg [16]
- File:Jaan Järve.jpg [17]
- File:Jaan Teemant.jpg [18]
--90.191.76.154 07:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Proceed with deletion. Chancellery of the Riigikogu had no idea where their images originated, but there was a good reason to assume that according to their age they should be under public domain. Photos by Parikas brothers are clearly not. Kruusamägi (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
1.) Inferior quality; 2.) seems to be taken from http://www.finemetal.ch/Site_mobile/inner_silber/1/ag Karl432 (talk) 18:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
1.) Inferior quality; 2.) seems to be taken from http://www.finemetal.ch/Site_mobile/inner_silber/1/ag Karl432 (talk) 18:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio: artist died in 1956 Sitacuisses (talk) 19:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This information about me is no longer valid. Please delete page and picture 65.51.220.242 19:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We rarely delete images at the request of the subject and never at the request of an anonymous third party who may be a vandal or enemy of the subject. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission. There is a statement that the depicted person would have given permission, but a) she is the wrong person (permission has to come from the photographer rather than from the subject) and b) the file has been uploaded after 31 December 2006, so that we require verification via OTRS. Jcb (talk) 19:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Pekka Sarkola. Uploaders name is stated to be Susanna Ånäs. Jcb (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Pekka Sarkola. Uploaders name is stated to be Susanna Ånäs. Jcb (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Pekka Sarkola. Uploaders name is stated to be Susanna Ånäs. Jcb (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Pekka Sarkola. Uploaders name is stated to be Susanna Ånäs. Jcb (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Pekka Sarkola. Uploaders name is stated to be Susanna Ånäs. Jcb (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Pekka Sarkola. Uploaders name is stated to be Susanna Ånäs. Jcb (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Pekka Sarkola. Uploaders name is stated to be Susanna Ånäs. Jcb (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Pekka Sarkola. Uploaders name is stated to be Susanna Ånäs. Also DW of maps with unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 19:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Pekka Sarkola. Uploaders name is stated to be Susanna Ånäs. Jcb (talk) 19:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status indeterminate. Taken from a website without photo credits, uploaded to Commons with pre-1923 PD template but there is no sign of first publication, nevertheless before 1923. czar 19:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Image uploaded under a false copyright claim of Creative Commons. This is the subject's official Canadian government portrait, but the Canadian government does not release its content under Commons -- it releases it under Crown copyright, a model which does not permit commercial reuse and is therefore incompatible with Wikipedia licensing requirements. As well, it contains captions embedded directly into the file, which Wikipedia photographs are not allowed to have. We have received takedown orders in the past for uploading and using Crown copyrighted content from the Canadian government, so we simply can't do it -- no Wikipedia policy requires us to use her official government portrait instead of the free image that the infobox already contained. Bearcat (talk) 19:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
This image occurs at the page given as source, however I was unable to verify license. Source page marked (C). Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio: en:Mabel Hill died in 1956. Sitacuisses (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 20:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Author? Are there "authors" in public headstones? This is a marble headstone which was put on a building in year 1935. What do you mean with "author"? The Municipality of Milan? Or you mean taht Commons needs to know who composed the text? or the mason who engraved the stone? Please explain your meaning for "author" of a carved headstone.--Paolobon140 (talk) 12:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Someone made this drawing in 1934. This person (and their heirs) are the copyright holder of this drawing until 70 years after his/her death. There are good chances that someone who made a drawing in 1934 is still alive in 1947, so that the copyright probably has not yet expired. Jcb (talk) 14:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- A public official of a Municpality does not hold any copyright on what he craetes in his official position.--Paolobon140 (talk) 10:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Frankly, the motivation behind this procedure is ridiculous. The plaque is held in an outside public space and was created by the municipality of Milan, a public institution. --Melancholia~itwiki (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's not known whether this would be a work of the municipality (seems improbable to me), so that we cannot go on such an assumption. Jcb (talk) 14:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- You are actually right: the headstone was commissioned by the en:National Council for Economics and Labour, a ministerial body founded by Mussolini in year 1930. It is clearly written on the stone and I am pretty sure you have read and understoood the text. So which is your question again? I can't understand your assumption that drives you to you mark Melalncholia's statement as "improbable". I strongly oppose the cancellation and i think you should bring some better motivation to your deletion request, that seems to be based on your personal POV. I think you are the one who should demosntrate the plaque has some copyright still held, ,instead.--Paolobon140 (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's not known whether this would be a work of the municipality (seems improbable to me), so that we cannot go on such an assumption. Jcb (talk) 14:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Frankly, the motivation behind this procedure is ridiculous. The plaque is held in an outside public space and was created by the municipality of Milan, a public institution. --Melancholia~itwiki (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- A public official of a Municpality does not hold any copyright on what he craetes in his official position.--Paolobon140 (talk) 10:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Someone made this drawing in 1934. This person (and their heirs) are the copyright holder of this drawing until 70 years after his/her death. There are good chances that someone who made a drawing in 1934 is still alive in 1947, so that the copyright probably has not yet expired. Jcb (talk) 14:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Well, JCB, are you suggesting an historic sign held on a public palace (it's the Milan Stock Exchange) is the result of the enterprise of a private citizien rather than a public office? (by the way, as PaoloBon suggested, it is written on the sign itself "Map of the remains of [...] edited by the concil for the Economy"--Melancholia~itwiki (talk) 16:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: the works produced on behalf of a public Administration (like "Consiglio dell'Economia") are protected for 20 years after their first exhibition; art. 29, Italian copyright act. No rights at all, fully legitimate reproduction. --g (talk) 21:29, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Per article 29. Note that this work did have a copyright until 1954 -- the comments above to the contrary are entirely wrong. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Unknown copyright accordig to source, not under a free license either. Sitacuisses (talk) 20:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Photo shows one of the band members who is transgender pre-op. As this image is the default image when searching the band's name, the picture should be removed. 2001:4898:80E8:2:0:0:0:4FD 20:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
No camera metadata, photographs are web-quality. Not likely to be uploader's own work.
- File:Femdom Foot Domination.jpg
- File:Foot Worship Mistress.jpg
- File:Female Domination-Foot Worship.png
- File:Female Domination.png
Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image. User does not react on talk page on NL Wikipedia Elly (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image. User does not react on talk page on NL Wikipedia Elly (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image. User does not react on talk page on NL Wikipedia Elly (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image. User does not react on talk page on NL Wikipedia Elly (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image. User does not react on talk page on NL Wikipedia Elly (talk) 12:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image. User does not react on talk page on NL Wikipedia Elly (talk) 12:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image. User does not react on talk page on NL Wikipedia Elly (talk) 12:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Bijzondere synagogedienst voor inhuldiging koning Willem-Alexander en Koningin Maxima.png
[edit]
copyrighted image Elly (talk) 12:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyvios. See here for example.
Wikicology (talk) 12:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RuaBreiner (talk · contribs)
[edit]The remaining 13 of this editor's uploads have been deleted as obvious copyvios. These do not show up in Google, but there is no reason to assume good faith.
- File:Beatie Wolfe start her week long album stream turntable & AR.png
- File:Beatie Wolfe plays New Theatre Royal.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Posters of May 1968 from France
[edit]Reproductions of derivative works of anonymous works above the threshold of originality for which {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} cannot apply as they were published in 1968. Per Commons:Anonymous works#France, they should be undeleted in 2039 if still anonymous then.
- File:Action 19 - 28 juin 1968.jpg
- File:Brisons l'étau.jpg
- File:Contre la répression patronale, organisons la lutte.jpg
- File:Délivrez les livres.jpg
- File:Halte au communisme totalitaire.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 02 Echec et Mat.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 03 Tricontinentale.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 04 Bicyclettes.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 05 SS.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 06 Universite Populaire.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 07 Chienlit.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 08 A Nous De Parler.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 09 Salaires Legers.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 10 Chacun de Nous.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 11 Reforme.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 12 Greve des Postiers.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 13 Lutte Continue.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 14 Remplacons Vieux Engrenages.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 15 Brisons Vieux Engrenages.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 16 Information Libre.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 17 RATP Tiendra.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 18 Jeunesse Avenir.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 19 Police ORTF.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 20 Unite Ouvriers Paysans.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 21 Nous Sommes Le Pouvoir.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 22 Renault Billancourt.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 23 Participation Gaulliste.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 24 Pouvoir Populaire.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 25 Resistance Proletarienne.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 26 Camarades Etrangers.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 28 Marionettes Populaires.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 29 Renault Flins.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 31 31bis.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 32 Lutte Prolongee.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 33 Pouvoir Populaire.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 34 Indesirables.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 35 Cohn Bendit Passera.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 36 Peuples Vaincront.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 37 Retour a La Normale.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 38 CDR.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 39 Aussi Des Hommes.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 40 Cadences Infernales.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 41 Et Apres.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 42 Lutte Prolongee.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 43 Police Beaux Arts.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 44 Machiavelique Moi.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 45 Police Vous Parle.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 46 Iran Chah.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 47 Bulletin de Vote.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 48 L Etat C Est Moi.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 49 Pouvoir Populaire Oui.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 50 On Vous Intoxique.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 51 Plus de Grand Patron.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 52 Sois Jeune.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 53 Quand Les Parents Votent.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 54 Ma Victoire.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 55 Capital.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 56 Revolution Essentielle.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 57 Garderie.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 58 Bourgeois.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 60 Moutons.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 61 Nous Participons.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 62 Brisons L Etau.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 63 Beaute Dans La Rue.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 64 Capital.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 65 Moi.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 66 Rectangle Blanc.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 67 Wolinski.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 68 Film Debats.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 69 Fete Populaire Du Marais.jpg
- File:Imagination Graphique 70 Bourgeois.jpg
- File:Je participe.jpg
- File:L'enragé 1 - 1 mai 1968.jpg
- File:L'intox vient à domicile.jpg
- File:L'ordre règne.jpg
- File:La beauté est dans le rue.jpg
- File:La chienlit c'est encore lui !.jpg
- File:La Chienlit c'est lui !.jpg
- File:Le cinéma s'insurge.jpg
- File:Mai 68 debut d'une lutte prolongee.png
- File:Paris May 1968 - Attention la radio ment.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - Cadences Infernales.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - Chienlit.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - CRS SS.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - Information libre.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - La beaut est dans la rue.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - La lutte continue.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - Lutte prolongée.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - Retour la normale.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - Réformes chloroforme.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - Révolution essentielle.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - Université populaire.svg
- File:Paris May 1968 - Usines occupées.svg
- File:Pas ça, mais la réforme avec De Gaulle.jpg
- File:Petit con révolutionnaire.jpg
- File:Pouvoir populaire oui.jpg
- File:Presse ne pas avaler - OpenClipart.svg
- File:Retour à la normale - 68.JPEG
- File:Tous unis camarades-Mai 1968.jpg
- File:Vive les occupations d'usines.jpg
- File:Votez toujours je ferai le reste.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 20:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Je ne sais pas pour les autres, mais les fichiers que j'ai uploadé depuis Gallica sont dans le domaine public:
- Conditions d’utilisation des contenus de Gallica
- 1/ Les contenus accessibles sur le site Gallica sont pour la plupart des reproductions numériques d'œuvres tombées dans le domaine public provenant des collections de la BnF. [19]
- S'ils disent que « La réutilisation commerciale de ces contenus est payante et fait l'objet d'une licence », c'est juste du fr:Copyfraud, on ne peut pas déclarer des droits sur le domaine public, même si on est la BnF (surtout sur des œuvres anonymes).
- Exemple d'affiche désignée comme « domaine public » : [20]
- Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ 23:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Trouvé ce matin : la notice BnF de La chienlit c'est lui ! (le bouton est difficilement accessible à cause d'un panneau mal foutu, aussi disponible ici (sous « Informations détaillées ») : [21]):
Titre : [Mai 1968]. La Chienlit c'est lui !, Atelier des Beaux-arts : [affiche] (Epreuve en blanc sur noir) / [non identifié] Éditeur : [s.n.][s.n.] Date d'édition : 1968 Sujet : France -- 1968 (Journées de mai) Sujet : Histoire Type : image fixe Langue : français Langue : français Format : 1 est. : sérigr. ; 43 x 32 cm Format : image/jpeg Format : Nombre total de vues : 1 Description : Affiche Droits : domaine public Identifiant : ark:/12148/btv1b9018186x Source : Bibliothèque nationale de France, ENT QB-1 (1968,7)-FT6 Notice du catalogue : http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb414369523 Provenance : Bibliothèque nationale de France Date de mise en ligne : 14/03/2011
- Que faut-il de plus pour prouver que cette œuvre (et toutes celles similaires) appartiennent bien au domaine public ?!. Le site de la BnF n'est il pas digne de confiance, surtout pour un fait aussi évident ? Quelle perte de temps pour rien...
- Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ 10:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment Although some individual artists have so far refrained from claiming authorship on these posters, some of them, such as Gérard Fromanger [22] [23], are well known. Jacques Carelman is known to be the author of CRS à la matraque [24] ; Bernard Rancillac, to be the author of Nous sommes tous des Juifs allemands [25] ; Jean Hillaireau, to be the author of La chienlit c'est lui [26]. Some of these posters, such as On vous intoxique, are collectively signed [27], which led some institutions, such as V&A or the Tate, to assign their authorship to a collective entity such as the Atelier populaire [28] [29] (which does not change anything to the PD calculation as the French copyright law is basically the same for collective works and anonymous works, "70 years from January 1 of the calendar year following that in which the work was published" per article L. 123-3 of the French Intellectual Property Law). In 2005, a French advertising campaign using some of these images raised concern about copyright infringement and the advertising agency stated they had "negotiated the rights" [30] [31]. — Racconish ☎ 16:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- J'ai écrit en français, merci de me répondre en français.
- Je parle dans le vide ou quoi ? Quelle partie de domaine public ne comprends-tu pas dans la notice de la BnF ?
- Les 70 ans ne concernent pas le domaine public, c'est autre chose...
- Marre de ces pertes de temps continuelles causées par des gars qui n'ont rien de mieux à faire que de nuire au travail des autres comme toi Racconish (ce n'est pas une « attaque personnelle », c'est juste mon ressenti concernant tes « contributions »). Amusez-vous bien, je m'en lave les mains.
- Şÿℵדαχ₮ɘɼɾ๏ʁ 19:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- + 1 --Noelbabar (talk) 21:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment Because of the multilingual nature of Commons, it is generally considered more polite to discuss in English, the lingua franca of the project (cf. Commons:For Wikipedians#Cultural differences). You stated on your user page you are fluent in English, therefore I assumed it would not be a problem for you. Nevertheless, if my comment above is not clear for you, I will be happy to translate it in French, si mon commentaire ci-dessus n'est pas clair pour toi, je me ferai un plaisir de le traduire en français. "The image is in the public domain because BNF says so" is not a valid argument on Commons. We have had many cases where we found BNF's assessments, often laxist, to be unsubstantiated or contradicted by facts. In this case, there is no claim by BNF of transfer of copyright to BNF itself, it is only an assessment, not a release in the public domain by the copyright owner, and this assessment is in plain contradiction with French copyright law with no indication of why there would be an exception and it is contradicted by other assessments from other cultural institutions, such as Tate, V&A, Musée Carnavalet, Library of Congress or Beinecke library. Your statement that 70 years do not apply to these images is a mystery to me. It is well documented that the intention of the authors was to remain anonymous, on the basis of a political opinion on the relationship between the individual and the collective authorship [32]. In most cases, these posters originate from Atelier populaire (ENSBA) or Atelier des Arts-décoratifs, and the best practice by cultural institutions is to describe them as anonymous works from such or such workshop. But it would be a mistake to assume that because a work is anonymous it falls in the public domain. — Racconish ☎ 07:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment Par ailleurs, certains de ces fichiers pourraient être placés sous cette licence. --Noelbabar (talk) 10:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
|
This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD § Fonts and typefaces or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information.
|
Comment La plupart de ces affiches ne sont pas signées, leurs auteurs ayant voulu volontairement rester anonymes, considérant que leurs créations participaient d'un commun du mouvement collectif et donc implicitement du domaine public. --Noelbabar (talk) 11:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Noelbabar you are making a confusion : an anonymous work does not fall ipso facto in the public domain. These works are protected by copyright even if they are anonymous. As for the threshold of originality, kindly clarify which one of the above would be under it according to you. I have been careful to avoid nominating text only posters. — Racconish ☎ 13:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment Les affiches sans maître de mai 68 / La contestation du droit d’auteur faisait partie des slogans de Mai 68. C’est dans cet esprit qu’ont été créées les célèbres affiches de mai 68, au sein de l’Atelier populaire installé dans l’Ecole des Beaux Arts de Paris. Même si on compte certains noms d’artistes célèbres, comme Gérard Fromanger, parmi les fondateurs de l’atelier, les affiches sérigraphiées furent volontairement publiées de manière anonyme, pour indiquer leur caractère d’oeuvres collectives et « sans maître ». -- « Rien n’est à nous ! » : Grandeur et misère du domaine public volontaire, lire en ligne. --Noelbabar (talk) 10:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment Reprenons : cette affiche, par exemple. 1 : Elle est ligne sur le site gallica.bnf.fr. 2 : En haut, à gauche de l'écran, Informations détaillées, dans la colonne qui s'affiche Droits : domaine public. Où est le problème ? --Noelbabar (talk) 11:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- As explained above, BNF's assessment as PD is not sufficient as it does not clarify why the work would be PD, in a context where such assessments by BNF have often been found unsufficient to establish PD on Commons. If, for example, BNF would claim the copyright has been transferred to itself, then it could release the image in the public domain, but such is not the case here. We can either consider the work is anonymous because the author(s) name has not been released ; or that the work is collectively signed by Atelier populaire, as other institutions such as V&A have done [33] (see also here). The distinction is irrelevant for copyright assessment purpose : the copyright duration is the same for anonymous works and collective works according to article L. 123-3 of the French Code de la propriété intellectuelle : 70 years from January 1 of the year following the publication. In any case the work is not PD yet. Also, the design of the factory and the flag are above the threshold of originality, which is why the derivative vector file File:Paris May 1968 - Lutte prolongée.svg should also be deleted. — Racconish ☎ 11:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment Donc, résumons. Vous contestez la pertinence du classement domaine public par la BNF en vous appuyant sur des sources de galeries marchandes... Et que pensez-vous des affiches placées sous la licence Open Clip Art Library dans la rubrique May 1968 Posters ? --Noelbabar (talk) 17:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, BNF itself also reckons the collective attribution to Atelier populaire. As for the Open Clip Art Library, what file other than File:Paris May 1968 - Lutte prolongée.svg are you asking about ? — Racconish ☎ 18:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment Cet autre fichier est encore plus éclairant : l'auteur physique et la BNF verse l'affiche dans le domaine public.
| Description |
Français : Titre : Les Affiches de mai 68 ou l'Imagination graphique : [exposition, Paris, Bibliothèque nationale, 17 février-31 mars 1982] / [catalogue par Charles Perussaux] ; [préface par Alain Gourdon]
Auteur : Perussaux, Charles (1920?-1995) Auteur : Bibliothèque nationale (France) Éditeur : Bibliothèque nationale (Paris) Date d'édition : 1982 Contributeur : Gourdon, Alain (1928-2013). Préfacier Sujet : Affiches politiques -- France -- 1945-1970 -- Catalogues d'exposition Sujet : France -- 1968 (Journées de mai) -- Affiches Type : monographie imprimée Langue : Français Format : [12] p.-70 p. de pl. : couv. ill. ; 22 cm Format : application/pdf Droits : domaine public Identifiant : ark:/12148/bpt6k6532558s Identifiant : ISBN 2717716254 Source : Bibliothèque nationale de France, département Recherche bibliographique, 2006-154060 Relation : http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb34670831w Description : [Exposition. Paris, Bibliothèque nationale. 1982] Provenance : bnf.fr Date de mise en ligne : 21/06/2013English: From the catalogue of anexhibition on French May 1968 protest posters: Les Affiches de mai 68 ou l'Imagination graphique. This exhibition was held at the Bibliothèque nationale de France (Paris) from 17 February till 31 March 1982.
Copyright holder of this exhibition catalogue is the Bibliothèque nationale de France itself, which has released this catalogue in the public domain. Permalink to the full scanned catalogue: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6532558s/f10.image |
| Date | |
| Source | http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k6532558s/f10.image |
| Author | Charles Perussaux (1920?-1995) & Bibliothèque nationale (Paris) |
--Noelbabar (talk) 22:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Both Alain Gourdon and Charles Perussaux are curators of BNF, i.e. employees of BNF. It is a standard practice in France to have stipulations in work contracts saying that the copyright of works done by employees as such are transferred to their employers. This may apply to their own work, the text they produced for this catalog. But this possible transfer of copyright to BNF does not imply a transfer of copyright on the posters to which the catalog refers. Gourdon and Perussaux are not the authors of these posters and cannot transfer to BNF the related copyright. Now concerning File:Paris May 1968 - La lutte continue.svg, it is a derivative of File:Imagination Graphique 13 Lutte Continue.jpg which is itself above the threshold of originality. The collective authorship of this file is claimed here by Atelier populaire (see also here). — Racconish ☎ 09:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- « Copyright holder of this exhibition catalogue is the Bibliothèque nationale de France itself, which has released this catalogue in the public domain. » --Noelbabar (talk) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- This is a circular reasoning, attempting to comfort an argument of authority, PD because BNF says so, by the same argument of authority, BNF because says so. You don't address the issue : why should we have here an exception to the French copyright law on anonymous or collective works ? — Racconish ☎ 13:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- « Copyright holder of this exhibition catalogue is the Bibliothèque nationale de France itself, which has released this catalogue in the public domain. » --Noelbabar (talk) 12:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- Anonymous works have a copyright for 70 years after creation. Collective works have the same copyright. If the authors are known, the right runs for 70 years after the death of the last author. While the new material in the catalogue may be free of copyright, there is no evidence that the posters themselves are. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Posters of May 1968 from France
[edit]Anonymous work published in 1968, not PD yet, above the threshold of originality.
— Racconish ☎ 05:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Posters of May 1968 from France
[edit]Anonymous work published in 1968, not PD yet, above the threshold of originality.
— Racconish ☎ 06:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Posters of May 1968 from France
[edit]Anonymous work published in 1968, not PD yet, above the threshold of originality.
— Racconish ☎ 06:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Posters of May 1968 from France
[edit]Anonymous work from 1968 will nter the public domain in 2039, unless their authorship is claimed before.
- File:Affiche contre le référendum - Archives nationales- AE-II-4203-38.jpg
- File:Affiche ORTF 2 - Archives nationales - AE-II-4203-43.jpg
- File:La police vous parle tous les soirs à 20h ORTF.jpg
- File:Unité contre le patronat, affiche - mai 68.jpg
— Racconish 💬 15:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Trademark. For sure not CC-BY-SA, and not own work. See https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_Libera.jpg Giovanni Cerretani (talk) 08:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The fact that it is a trademark is irrelevant. It is certainly PD in the USA -- type faces do not have any copyright in the USA. It is probably PD in Italy as well, but I would like another opinion. IF kept, the license should be changed to {{PD-textlogo}}. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Jim. --Guanaco (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
suplicate of file:Florent Lacasse coach.jpg Trizek from FR 09:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
There's no freedom of panorama in Canada. Main subject of the photo is a complex logo. OTRS-permission from school representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation (likely) Sebleouf (talk) 11:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence this was released under a Wikimedia-friendly license. FallingGravity (talk) 07:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I don't believe this is a work of the U.S. federal government. The Las Vegas Review-Journal indicates the image is from the suspect's driver's license. [34] You typically have to apply for a new driver's license when you move to another state. Because the subject last lived in Nevada, it's reasonable to assume that he also has a Nevada driver's license. If the police were to publish someone's driver's license photo, then it would make the most sense to use the most recent one. Therefore, this image is likely unfree. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Livet TheBeat Maker (talk · contribs)
[edit] | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
- File:Livet TheBeat Maker(Livet Beats ) 06.jpg
- File:Livet TheBeat Maker(Livet Beats ) 05.jpg
- File:Livet TheBeat Maker(Livet Beats ) 04.jpg
- File:Livet TheBeat Maker(Livet Beats ) LIVET.jpg
- File:Livet TheBeat Maker(Livet Beats ) 03.jpg
- File:Livet TheBeat Maker(Livet Beats ) 01.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 21:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trends.sky (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope; unused personal images.
Hystrix (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be TV screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Publicity. E4024 (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:36, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bICNFNCSgZQ - shared under Standard YouTube License Ytoyoda (talk) 15:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image PrayforLasVegas (talk) 21:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama for statues in USA. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://hikearizona.com/t2016/11/03/S_3483-42587_1478184413-02.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://s2.glbimg.com/fFhaR6BfOWHQGH-8YqyAgn9sDHI=/1200x630/s.glbimg.com/jo/g1/f/original/2015/08/06/bier_620.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-awKlDMmx6wY/UuUxP_qKv8I/AAAAAAAAADQ/F7TrMAdnlNA/s1600/377719_557761430909212_210380949_n.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
non-useful file Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:35, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
uploaded with error of framing Pastratopi (talk) 14:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:Miracle Foodmart Logo.jpg. czar 05:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Bild veraltet, neues Bild bereits unter Samuel Schürmann hochgeladen Timlovesblue (talk) 20:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. czar 05:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Fehlload, bitte löschen Timlovesblue (talk) 20:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion #7: uploader request. czar 05:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
imagen duplicada TerenceBird5584 (talk) 21:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of authorship; prior upload: https://tomefc98.deviantart.com/art/Angry-Birds-Chuck-Yellow-Super-High-Quality-329171551. czar 05:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
It's from some "soundcloud.com" website, which doesn't appear to be NASA website. Therefore, it may very well not be from NASA, but a fake instead. 213.164.103.154 22:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- keep - the recording was published by NASA. The Soviet satellite was transmitting scientific data coded in the duration and spacing of the beeps (temperature and pressure inside the sphere). There is no artistry to it, it is a brief excerpt of the transmission. Anyone in the world could have received and recorded the radio transmission when the satellite passed overhead, making the value of any particular recording low. -- Ke4roh (talk) 00:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Could you prove your statement, that "the recording was published by NASA"? For now I see, that it was published by "soundcloud.com", claiming it comes from NASA. Does NASA itself approve on its website, that the recording at "soundcloud.com" comes from them? Otherwise I don't believe, that it was published by NASA.188.69.194.33 08:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- NASA Audio and Ringtones page, published at nasa.gov, claims ownership of and links to the Soundcloud account that provided this recording. Barring hacking, it was published by NASA. -- Ke4roh (talk) 14:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'm satisfied with the proof. 188.69.210.27 20:37, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- NASA Audio and Ringtones page, published at nasa.gov, claims ownership of and links to the Soundcloud account that provided this recording. Barring hacking, it was published by NASA. -- Ke4roh (talk) 14:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Could you prove your statement, that "the recording was published by NASA"? For now I see, that it was published by "soundcloud.com", claiming it comes from NASA. Does NASA itself approve on its website, that the recording at "soundcloud.com" comes from them? Otherwise I don't believe, that it was published by NASA.188.69.194.33 08:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved per discussion, though NASA's listed cc-by-nc license was undiscussed. czar 05:12, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Marchjuly nominated the logo for speedy deletion with reason "No indication found on source url that file has been released under a "cc-zero" license" and I deleted it, but then started to think: maybe the logo is still simple? I restored it and created a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete : I nominated the file for speedy deletion per COM:CSD#F4 because it's license could not be verified. The file seems fair use to me, but the COM:TOO#India is not really clear and seems to imply that both the US and UK interpretations can be applied. If the UK's one is applied, this seems clearly to be above that TOO and the file should definitely be deleted; if the US's one is applied, this seems to be borderline at best so maybe it should be deleted per COM:PCP. After the Commons' file was deleted, someone uploaded en:File:Star India Logo.jpg as non-free content locally to Wikipedia. This non-free file is fine, but it will not be needed per en:WP:NFCC#1 if the consensus is not to delete the Commons' file. -- Marchjuly (talk)
- Delete - above TOO - Jcb (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: above TOO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright holder is "Juergen Hammerschmid". Evidence of permission is required. Wikicology (talk) 12:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
This is an old photo of Swami Brahmadeo Upadhyay, who was born in 1945. This is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Better source and copyright info is required, or evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Diannaa (talk) 13:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - seems a photo of photo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Poland for temporary displays. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
low-quality photo, watermark makes it unsuitable for encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+maybe out of scope+maybe copyright issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Cover art of unknown age. Stefan2 (talk) 18:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a scan of a newspaper or something. I can't find any date. Stefan2 (talk) 18:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a scan of a newspaper or something. I can't find any date. Stefan2 (talk) 18:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Own scan, but the copyright doesn't belong to the uploader. Needs a proper license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a newspaper or newsletter or something. Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: en:Darcy Nicholas is a contemporary artist; the date 1895 can't be found at the source page. Sitacuisses (talk) 19:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio: According to the source page, the artist died in 1965. The description and date is wrong as well. Sitacuisses (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Luxembourgh Vera (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 20:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Against --Yuriy Urban (talk) 15:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Why? Jcb (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Моя твоя не понимать) Against (wtf Anita Meyer?)--Yuriy Urban (talk) 20:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- You have to explain why you disagree with the nomination, otherwise closing administrator will just ignore your comment. A DR is not a vote. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Моя твоя не понимать) Against (wtf Anita Meyer?)--Yuriy Urban (talk) 20:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Why? Jcb (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information on the photographer of this 3D object, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:31, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
All boards and paintings from an exhibition. With Google translator I've understood from the description "Photograph: BATACHAN" ( 撮影者：BATACHAN). I conclude that BATACHAN isn't the author of the paintings and/or the boards. In that unfortunate case, they're all copyvio. (maybe someone more familiar than me with Japanese and FOP in Japan can check his others uploads, e.g. figurines, boards, screens,...)
- File:切り絵「天駈」説明パネル.jpg
- File:切り絵「天駈」2.jpg
- File:切り絵「天駈」1.jpg
- File:切り絵「神秋」「檜冬」（右側2枚・左より）.jpg
- File:切り絵「瞬春」「厳夏」「神秋」「檜冬」説明パネル.jpg
- File:切り絵「瞬春」「厳夏」（左より）.jpg
- File:北海漁祖折居姥神夷人示教之図・解説.jpg
- File:北海漁祖折居姥神夷人示教之図.jpg
- File:大型スクリーンによる映像展示.jpg
- File:姥神大神宮渡御祭・解説パネルと資料.jpg
- File:姥神大神宮渡御祭・8月11日行事の解説パネル.jpg
- File:姥神大神宮渡御祭・8月10日行事の解説パネル.jpg
- File:姥神大神宮渡御祭・8月9日行事の解説パネル.jpg
- File:13-政宗山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:12-清正山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:10-聖武山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:11-源氏山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:09-義公山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:08-譽山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:07-楠公山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:06-豊年山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:05-蛭子山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:04-豊榮山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:02-神功山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:03-新栄山・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:01-松寳丸・展示パネル（名刺・説明）.jpg
- File:13-政宗山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:12-清正山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:11-源氏山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:10-聖武山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:09-義公山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:08-譽山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:07-楠公山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:06-豊年山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:05-蛭子山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:04-豊榮山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:02-神功山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:03-新栄山・展示パネル（人形・水引・装飾等）.jpg
- File:01-松寳丸・展示パネル（山車・水引・装飾等）.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 20:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- 表記の件、了解しました。（Google翻訳による）
- 上記の画像につきましては、投稿時に作者に関する記述を加えてあり、各社が展示先の「江差追分会館・江差山車会館」館長及び「江差町役場」町長に属する作者であると表記していますので、それに付随した扱いとして頂けると助かります。
- 当方としては、投稿時の表記の併記で元々の所有者及び作者に対して考慮しておりますので、ご理解の程よろしくお願いします。
--BATACHAN (talk) 20:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment BATACHANさん、Commons:OTRS/ja#あなたが著作権者ではない場合をお読みください。「作者に関する記述」「表記」「考慮」だけでは足りません。「作者/著作権者」がコモンズで受け入れ可能なライセンス（BATACHANさんが記載されたのはTemplate:Attribution）によりコモンズへの投稿（それはすなわち、ウィキメディアだけでなく全世界の人がライセンスに従って「再頒布、二次的著作物の製作、商用利用等のあらゆる使用」ができるようになること）を承諾していただき、その証拠となる許諾メールを permissions-commons
wikimedia.orgに送付してください。承諾宣言書の電子メールひな型はCommons:メール・テンプレートにあります。--miya (talk) 11:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination- the uploder seems to be the photographer however the photos are derivative works, see https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BA%8C%E6%AC%A1%E5%89%B5%E4%BD%9C%E7%89%A9. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:43, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yutiwittiee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two social media photos with multiple hits on Google Reverse Search (Twitter, etc.). File:วิศรัตน์.jpg is watermarked and clearly taken from some website. Unlikely to be "Own work" for any of these low-res images. However, I can't read the language to check for further details.
GermanJoe (talk) 20:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
The poster is to prominent. De minimis does not apply. DW. The sole purpose of the image is to show the poster. And the image is used in that way in the corresponding articles at WP-de. 77.5.158.208 09:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream. Rahul Bott (talk) 10:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Andrey Selskiy is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
File:The illustrated companion to the Latin dictionary and Greek lexicon; forming a glossary of all the words representing visible objects connected with the arts, manufactures, and every-day life of the (14597818857).jpg
[edit]
doublon de File:The illustrated companion to the Latin dictionary and Greek lexicon; forming a glossary of all the words representing visible objects connected with the arts, manufactures, and every-day life of the (14781339611).jpg (même médiocre image) Ursus (talk) 15:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Different scans, possibly from different prints. Keep --Fæ (talk) 11:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. In my opinion both are valuable. Taivo (talk) 16:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
File:The illustrated companion to the Latin dictionary and Greek lexicon; forming a glossary of all the words representing visible objects connected with the arts, manufactures, and every-day life of the (14784073102).jpg
[edit]
doublon de File:The illustrated companion to the Latin dictionary and Greek lexicon; forming a glossary of all the words representing visible objects connected with the arts, manufactures, and every-day life of the (14781339611).jpg (même médiocre import de dictionnaire) Ursus (talk) 15:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hm... both files are not identical and in comparison File:The illustrated companion to the Latin dictionary and Greek lexicon; forming a glossary of all the words representing visible objects connected with the arts, manufactures, and every-day life of the (14781339611).jpg appears to me more blurred than the nominated file File:The illustrated companion to the Latin dictionary and Greek lexicon; forming a glossary of all the words representing visible objects connected with the arts, manufactures, and every-day life of the (14784073102).jpg. It is interesting to note that the same illustration appears twice in the companion, first on p. 133 as illustration for Cave canem, i.e. beware of the dog, then on p. 186 as illustration for a dog's collar. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Different scans, possibly from different prints. Keep --Fæ (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Fæ: Not different prints, but different pages of the same book, see my analysis above. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Faebot has 'uncropped' them, which makes their differences easier to appreciate. Users can choose to recrop the illustrations within the pages as they wish. --Fæ (talk) 18:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Fæ: Not different prints, but different pages of the same book, see my analysis above. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo, along with the rest of the account contributions. Artix Kreiger (talk) 17:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
At the original uploader’s request. Tyseria (d)(Sorry for my english !) 17:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused personal images. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
At the original uploader’s request. Tyseria (d)(Sorry for my english !) 18:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal images. per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
This file is an image of myself and was published without my consent. As I don't think this is in compliance with German personality and copyright law (§22 and §23 KunstUrhG), being no person of public interest, and the picture is not relevant to any Wikimedia article, I ask the uploader to remove this image. I respect his intentions, but seek to not have pictures of myself on the internet. Fossila (talk) 22:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Warum nur ein Bild. Besser ist noch 181 files. Zwiadowca 21 09:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with Fossila: Several of those images may have to be deleted if there’s no explicit constent from the depicted people. See also COM:PEOPLE. Imho those might even qualify for speedy deletion with reason F1/F5.
- On the other hand, for several of the images §23 Abs. 1 Nr. 3 applies, which allows images of events („Versammlungen, Aufzügen und ähnlichen Vorgängen“), including representative images, for which signle persons were selected as characteristical and exemplary for the event („repräsentative Aufnahmen, bei denen einzelne Personen als charakteristisch und beispielhaft für die Ansammlung herausgegriffen worden seien“ (BGH VI ZR 197/13)). Or in other words: The images clearly showing the sport event, even if there’s only a single person, are fine, the images showing only a portrait of a single person aren’t. --Nenntmichruhigip (talk) 10:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
I'd like this category page to be deleted so that the category page for Category:Images from the Geograph British Isles project can be moved to this name. This is in accordance with my unopposed renaming proposal.
I did mark the page for speedy deletion under criterion G6, uncontroversial maintenance, but Y.haruo had SteinsplitterBot remove the deletion template, so it's apparently more controversial than I thought.
Prior to that I mentioned this at the administrators' noticeboard, leading to a discussion in which it was suggested that the move should be reversed. Despite that, no admin has yet re-edited the (protected) {{Geograph}} template to move files back to the old category, so for now I assume that the move hasn't been vetoed.
Again I'd like to apologise to the community for the mess caused by my failure to rename the category page before having the template updated. I'll get it right next time. --bjh21 (talk) 00:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I have made a mistake. I make an opposite category redirection now.--Y.haruo (talk) 01:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- First wait for the server to move all the images, then delete the category as empty; it's the best way. Those maintenances due to updating templates can last a lot of time. --Ruthven (msg) 20:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: How would that work? The category page whose deletion I'm proposing is at the new name, the one that is filling up, so when the move is complete I don't expect it to be empty; I expect it to have 1.7M files in it. Furthermore, if I wait until the move is complete then there's a danger that the old category page will be deleted, and that's the one whose history I'm trying to preserve. --bjh21 (talk) 22:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- First wait for the server to move all the images, then delete the category as empty; it's the best way. Those maintenances due to updating templates can last a lot of time. --Ruthven (msg) 20:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: and move done as per Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/08/Category:Images from the Geograph British Isles project. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused, lower quality version of File:Roue des ODD - Transparente.png Louperivois Ψ @ 16:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
It is actually the content of a recent open letter in Persian 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 12:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC) The Photo is meant for WIKI LOVES AFRICA project. It does meets the guidelines. Laru0004 (talk)
- Comment There seems to be an issue with source, as there is no metadata and the image is Facebook sized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Aucune source fiable de qui est sur cette. Not reliable source of who is it. Unreliable source. Historien2208 (talk) 13:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Even if we are not sure who he is, can't we keep the file as pic of "some" Nazi officer? One day we may repent having deleted it because we may find out who he is and need the pic. What if we just change the name and leave it? --E4024 (talk) 13:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep La photographie a été prise le 27 juin 1943 lors d'un discours de Léon Degrelle en présence de Richard Jungclaus dont d'autres portraits (2) peuvent être consultés sur la source indiscutable du CEGESOMA. A conserver amha. --Madelgarius (talk) 16:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: there is a source; per Madelgarius. Ruthven (msg) 12:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
F. Cipolla took the other photographs generally with a Nikon but this one is Canon. Doubtful own work claim 141.196.217.10 22:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: it's a Canon probably because the subject of the photo is not the photographer. OTRS permissions needed. Ruthven (msg) 12:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
I strongy doubt that this file is a work of the uploader, confer date and description. I already asked on the uploader’s talk page for fixing source, author and licence attribution, but there is no reaction until now. So let me ask here for changes or deletion. Speravir 22:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I won't be at all surprised if this work turns out to be in the public domain, but certainly the information currently on the page provides no evidence for that. - Jmabel ! talk 22:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:13, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream. Rahul Bott (talk) 18:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Dieses Bild ist nicht das Ohrenbach wie im Text beschrieben. Bitte unbedingt löschen. Das Bild ist falsch. Bitte mit Google Earth oder ähnlich vergleichen. 87.164.63.4 09:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Damit bist Du hier an der falschen Adresse. Nur weil jemand ein Bild in einen falschen Artikel eingebunden hat, muss ja das Bild nicht gelöscht werden. Der Ort, um das zu klären, wäre die deutschsprachige Wikipedia, am besten auf der Artikeldisk. --87.150.3.137 11:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- English: Deletion request because the picture has been included in a wrong article, possibly a town with a synonymous name. This should be discussed on the article talk page and is no reason for deletion here. IMO, this request can be closed. --87.150.3.137 11:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 16:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
This video was uploaded to YouTube by someone who isn't related to RTL Nieuws and doesn't own the copyright of this leader 213.46.17.47 18:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- This leader is uploaded by TwoSense, Audiovisuele Producties (https://www.youtube.com/user/martijnbart/about) who uploaded their portfolio. http://www.twosensemedia.nl/ is offline, when I look at https://web.archive.org/web/20130819201625/http://twosensemedia.nl/ it doesn't seem this is a producer of leader animations. Bit doubtful if TwoSense is the copyrightholder. --Hannolans (talk) 09:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, and if you take a look to the videos on their YouTube channel, you see a huge difference in quality of the videos. So is the channel promo a simple animation, and do they have funny videos (Lol with Wireless Mic xD), with children (I don't think a child would make a leader for national television). And when you look at the upper-left corner of the leader, you see the logo of RTL XL, the video on demand service of RTL. So that means this video is a screen record. If TwoSense really was the copyright holder, it would be a full HD video without any logo. 213.46.17.47 18:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: even if TwoSense produced the intro, it is a work for hire and the rights belong to the News channel. Ruthven (msg) 08:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
The monumento all'operaosità bustocca has been made in 200 by Nazareno Panzeri (born in 1935). There is no FOP in Italy for modern artworks, and the copyright hasn't expired.
- File:Museo del tessile (Busto Arsizio) - monumento.jpg
- File:Museo del tessile e monumento.jpg
- File:Museodeltessile002.jpg
- File:Nel metallo.JPG
- File:NEL PARCO DEL MUSEO DEL TESSILE.JPG
- File:PArco Museo Tessile statua.jpg
- File:Statua museo tessile.jpg
- File:Statua Parco museo del Tessile.jpg
Ruthven (msg) 11:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ruthven, questi sono munumenti esplicitamente autorizzati per Wiki Loves Monuments, user:Cristian Cenci (WMIT) ha una copia delle singole autorizzazioni per ciascun ente, che fa da garanzia anche per eventuali diritti d'autore, come accadde l'anno scorso ad esempio per i mosaici moderni del museo di Ravenna (Chagall, Picasso e tanti altri autori moderni non in PD). Non so se queste autorizzazioni passano attarverso OTRS o comunque restano a Wikimedia, ma prima di partire in quarta con le cancellazioni forse dovresti prima farti qualche domanda e chiarire un attimo la situazione con i responsabili. Questo vale anche per i monumenti di Terni che hai cancellato. --Sailko (talk) 11:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Sailko: Ho cercato fra i permessi, ma non ho trovato questo monumento.
- I've looked through the permissions WLM for Busto Arsizio and haven't found this monument in any permission document. Maybe I missed something, and Cristian Cenci (WMIT) can help us, but, otherwise, it's a copyvio. --Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Per quanto riguarda Terni, era stata autorizzata postuma da Pomodoro in quanto una foto era stata selezionata tra le vincitrici. Era prima del mio arrivo: cerco di recuperare l'atto. Per Busto, l'autorizzazione è per il Parco del Tessile, ivi comprese le opere. --CristianNX 11:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- @CristianNX: Per Terni non ci sono problemi; infatti ho ripristinato la foto. Per Busto, si parla del "Museo del Tessile" e del "Parco del Tessile" [35], ma le opere non sono menzionate, il che lascia planare il dubbio (sopratutto per le opere di autori contemporanei). --Ruthven (msg) 20:50, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Per quanto riguarda Terni, era stata autorizzata postuma da Pomodoro in quanto una foto era stata selezionata tra le vincitrici. Era prima del mio arrivo: cerco di recuperare l'atto. Per Busto, l'autorizzazione è per il Parco del Tessile, ivi comprese le opere. --CristianNX 11:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Withdrawn: There is a permission for the "Park"; I presume that it is about the monuments erected there, and not for the plants. --Ruthven (msg) 10:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn by user. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused outside log pages and deprecated BSicon naming; semantically equivalent to File:BSicon fextBHFaf.svg. Jc86035 (talk) 04:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
This file is consistent with others with different colors, and looks better than File:BSicon fextBHFaf.svg. Probably should be consolidated but should be done consistently. Acnetj (talk) 07:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Acnetj: I didn't realize that the tunnel portal of the icon wasn't centred along the track. I'll be reuploading some of the "other colors" station tunnel portal icons sometime this/next week so they should look consistent soon. Jc86035 (talk) 07:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: looks obsolete. --JuTa 17:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
