Archive
Archives
  1. 2006
  2. 2007
  3. 2008 (older conversations)
Babel user information
en
es-3
sco-3
it-2
nl-2
de-2
da-2
Template:User pdc-2
la-1
fr-1
pt-1
ro-1
hu-1
uk-1
ru-1
ja-1
tr-1
ar-1
fa-1
ga-1
cy-1
Users by language

...Begin new discussions here...

Category talk:Bicycle transport

edit

Hi - could you please relook at this, as per my explanation? Cheers and happy editing. Ingolfson (talk) 06:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, me again, I responded. You probably watchlist the talk page of the category anyway, but just to be sure. See ya, Ingolfson (talk) 10:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Bossi, could you add your opinion to this discussion? Sorry if I am imposing - but it's something that I feel is rather important, yet I have no idea how many people will read / respond to this. Sometimes Commons can be (well, appear) rather dead in regards to people responding on non-personal talk pages. Ingolfson (talk) 11:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for supporting me on this. Sometimes I wonder why I go through this all (not complaining about the fact that other people have other opinions sometimes - just that I DO take these things a bit (too?) serious sometimes ;-) Too much time invested to feel casual about it, I guess. Ingolfson (talk) 06:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah... I get in the same situation... hence why I've been trying to distance myself from Wikimedia. Much less aggravation that way! --Bossi (talkgallerycontrib) 06:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unidentified Spider

edit

File:4915 - Mürren-Gimmelwald - Araneae.JPG and File:6168 - Meiringen - Araneae.JPG are Araneus diadematus / European garden spiders, and if you want to thank me you can do so on my wikipedia page, [1] --Bugboy52.4 (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! --Bossi (talkgallerycontrib) 05:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Roaring Spring pic

edit

Your pic of Main St. and Girard in Roaring Spring, Pennsylvania is misnamed. You have it named Main and Grand. A quick look at the street sign shows that it's Main and Girard. I fixed the description. Dincher (talk) 20:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

file:2415-2416 - München - Sendlinger Tor.jpg

edit

found on [2] --Martina Nolte (talk) 13:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

FP Nomination

edit
 

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:2007 10 25 - Greenbelt - Water drops on a Saab 9-3 roof 1.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2007 10 25 - Greenbelt - Water drops on a Saab 9-3 roof 1.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image of yours used elsewhere

edit

An image of yours is currently being used at Conservapedia [3]. The attribution is simply "WikiCommons" and doesn't state the GFDL license or its implications. I urge you to point this out.[4] As the copyright holder, you are the only person that can take action. --Shagie (talk) 17:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Curb_extensions_at_midblock_crosswalk.jpg

edit

This picture is described as "Bulb outs at a midblock crosswalk in Canada (likely in British Columbia)" but was taken in Denver. See [5].

Your photos at Category:Chagallfenster (Fraumünster)

edit

Hi Thisisbossi You pics from inside Fraumünster at Zurich are relaly beatiful, but I fear they are Copyright infringement. The Freedom of Panorama in Switzerland is only valid outside of a building, not inside. Combinded with the question of en:Swiss copyright law Marc Chagall (or his heritages) have to allow the use on commons, because Chagall died in 1985 and so we'll have to wait till 2056 for the end of protection. -- Badener  07:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Feel free to file a deletion request. --Iotatau (talk) 10:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nutzung deiner Fotos

edit

Hallo Thisisbossi

Das wiki Fotodok.ch dokumentiert die Fotografie im Kanton Luzern und anhand der Fotografie den Kanton Luzern. Du hast in Luzern fotografiert und ich möchte dich bitten, dass wir diese Bilder unter Namensnennung/Link diese Seite in unserer Lexikon einbinden zu können. Besten Dank im Vorraus Gruss_ --Nienetwiler (talk) 08:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Meines Wissens hat Thisisbossi Wikipedia verlassen. Zum Verwenden seiner auf Commons hochgeladenen Fotos ist seine Zustimmung nicht erforderlich, einfach die Regelungen einhalten, die hier wiedergegeben sind: Reusing content outside Wikimedia. Im Prinzip genügen Namensnennung und Verweis auf Wikimedia-Lizenz. Auf einer deutschsprachigen Wikipedia-Seite steht dieser konkrete Hinweis: "S. [Buchseite]: [Nutzername oder bürgerlicher Name], Wikimedia Commons, lizenziert unter CreativeCommons-Lizenz [by-sa-2.0-de (bzw. die jeweils im Bild genannte Lizenz)]." Ist nur eine GFDL-Lizenz verfügbar, muss das Druckwerk die GFDL-Lizenz wiedergeben. --Iotatau (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Danke für die Info_Gruss --Nienetwiler (talk) 07:32, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:1555_-_North_Berkeley_-_Aquaduct.JPG

edit
 
File:1555_-_North_Berkeley_-_Aquaduct.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jeanne Mozier (talk) 03:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hermosas fotos

edit

Saludos Bossi, he aqui solo para decirte que disfrute tus maravillosas fotos e incluso de tu interesante existencia, llena de virtudes y experiencias. En buena hora y mucha suerte! Te deseo lo mejor.<<Estrellafeliz (talk) 04:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)>>Reply

Muchos gracias! :) --Bossi (talkgallerycontrib) 01:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nicht-Lizenzkonforme Benutzung eines Bildes

edit

http://hpd.de/node/11747 Hallo! Unter diesem Link ist eines deiner Bilder nicht lizenzkonform weiterverwendet! File:IMG 0180 - Wien - Stephansdom 3.jpg Grüße, --PolskiNiemiec (talk) 16:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vielen Dank! Ihr Einsatz ist nicht perfekt, aber gut genug für mich. --Bossi (talkgallerycontrib) 01:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
File:6683 - Moscow - Krasnopresnenskaya naberezhnaya.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.181.19 21:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
File:6684 - Moscow - Krasnopresnenskaya naberezhnaya.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.181.19 21:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:0725 - Bad Mitterndorf.JPG

edit

Hallo Thisisbossi! Das Bild zeigt anscheinend den Bahnhof Bad Mitterndorf, die Koordinaten des Kamerastandortes liegen aber in der Haltestelle Bad Mitterndorf Heilbrunn. Kannst du das aufklären oder ändern? Gruß Priwo (talk) 09:39, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Connecticut_Avenue

edit
 

Category:Connecticut_Avenue has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mjrmtg (talk) 16:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Use of image in simple computer game

edit

Hi,

some time ago I've written a simple computer game called "Bojownicy Krwawych Wierszy" in which players get score for knowledge of lyrics of songs of polish band "Republika". You can download the game here - http://daltonlabs.tk/index.php/projekty/8-bojownicy-krwawych-wierszy-gierka-na-znajomosc-tekstow-grzegorza-ciechowskiego - and try it, it is in polish, but it's very simple. Now I want to create another (english) version with Genesis lyrics. May I use this image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2369_-_Philadelphia_-_Wachovia_Center_-_Genesis_-_I_Can%27t_Dance.JPG ?

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stolbovsky (talk) 09:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Seebrücke

edit
 

Seebrücke has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Hiddenhauser (talk) 08:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Lugislandturm

edit
 

Category:Lugislandturm has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Schofför (talk) 10:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Diverters

edit
 

Diverters has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:57, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Suburbs

edit
 

Suburbs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 04:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 11:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply