Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Queryzo

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

closed as successful, however, it is on the edge. Please consider very carefully comments you received, especially from the oppose votes.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

---

Queryzo

Vote

RfP scheduled to end after 27 May 2017 08:09 (UTC)

• Queryzo (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

As my previous speaker I heard of the fact, that admins are needed in Wikidata. At Wikidata:Forum we identified many empty items (~ 6.700) which now are flooding Wikidata:RfD. If the community gives me sysop rights, I can help with that and everyday work.

I am Admin at dewiki and wikipedia user for over 10 years. I have started to contribute to Wikidata in the end of 2013. Since then I did over 700,000 edits, mostly with helping tools like Quick Statements, Harvest Template and Pet Scan. Mainly I contribute in the film section. As member of the Wikidata:WikiProject Movies I tested a lot with Mix'n'match catalogs. Further more I am very active in working with constraint violations.

If you support my request, I would be happy about your vote.

--Queryzo (talk) 08:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Votes

1.  Support --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
2.  Support Steak (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
3.  Support. Thanks for your work! − Pintoch (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
4.  Support Definitely! -- Hoo man (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
5.  Support --Rschen7754 18:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC) Moving to  Oppose per concerns over requests for deletion. --Rschen7754 00:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
6.  Support --Mirer (talk) 00:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
7.  Support ChristianKl (talk) 13:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)  Oppose Given the latest issue that User:XXN highlites of nominating multiple Dutch items with have references to RKDartists ID (P650) I'm not anymore comfortable about giving out deletion rights, because I fear valuable items like this would be deleted. ChristianKl (talk) 18:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
8.  Support Jonathan Groß (talk) 13:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
9.  Support. Geagea (talk) 13:36, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
10.  Support --Epìdosis 14:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
11.  Support Taketa (talk) 15:36, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
12.  Support Mahir256 (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
13.  Oppose Lymantria (talk) 19:25, 23 May 2017 (UTC) See my comments below
14.  Support - yona b (talk) 06:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
15.  Support Rzuwig^► 18:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
16.  Support steady contributor in different fields. --- Jura 09:22, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments

• today I marked some 200 deletion requests by you as not done, including some high quality items like Saint Margaret of Antioch church in Ciechocin (Q29974825). If you have the admin rights would you have deleted all these items? --Pasleim (talk) 15:28, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

  The items are taken from WDQ, they are all empty except for some valid items, which are wrong listed. I would, of course, not delete them. Queryzo (talk) 20:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC) PS: I apologize for listing the Civil Parish items, but I couldn’t withdraw them as I recognized they are notable.

  Why couldn't you? Lymantria (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

  Because I don't know how. PetScan etc. have opportunities to select items from descriptions (so I could add some statements for them), but the RfD website only have blank item numbers, so that it is very tough to refind sth. Queryzo (talk) 13:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

  I hope you are aware that all your requests have to be handled manually and are checked one by one by administrators. Those are checks you could have done as well. You should have in fact. But the portion of incorrect requests is more than I can neglect. Then saying that you don't know how to withdraw them and that they are hard to check manually, is simply not good enough. If you are careless like this in doing your request, I am not confident in your administrator abilities. Lymantria (talk) 19:24, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

  As I said, the items are taken from WDQ. I nominate them by a given query (see Wikidata:Forum). Most of these items has been deleted. In the last days I nominated some items from User:Pasleim/Items for deletion/Page deleted, Now I see I have to be more careful with these items. I am still learning to deal with notability guidlines, thank you all for your patience. Queryzo (talk) 20:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

• BTW, how easy it is to undelete page here? d1g (talk) 17:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

  @D1gggg: What do you mean with that? Queryzo (talk) 20:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

  Just like on any other wiki, it can be done by users with undelete right (but how is it relevant here?). Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

  I thought it is something complex after first comment. d1g (talk) 12:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

  @D1gggg:Any admin can undelete but users who aren't admins only see the ID of an items and not their label so it's not easy for them to complain that an item they created was falsely deleted. ChristianKl (talk) 18:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

• Most of your RfDs are fine. However, I am concerned with what Pasleim has said. It is good that you want to help, but I am not sure if you took the time to check the items thoroughly before nominating them for deletion. Accuracy is more important than speed. I have declined some of your RfDs. Anyway, I am striking my support for now. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 18:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

  See my comment above. Queryzo (talk) 20:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

• Items like Jean Moréas (Q20642804) sould not be deleted as you proposed but sould be merged! I agree with Jianhui67 that you didnt took the time to check the items thoroughly before nominating them for deletion. --Nikosguard ^talk 13:08, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

  Sorry for that but we're about to delete thousands of items (over 3.000 have been deleted in the last week), so there is not much time to check single deletion requests. I would like to ask all members of this project to help, either give statements to empty items or if they are admin, delete them. Queryzo (talk) 13:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

• I see there are again many invalid deletion requests. Seems that Queryzo does not check items and their histories before posting DRs, even after other users tried to draw their attention on this fact, following previous bad DRs. I'm not sure if the candidate is aware of Wikidata notability criteria, common deletion outcomes and consensuses/outcomes of some relevant RFCs. --XXN, 12:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.