Wikidata:Property proposal/observed in
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
observed in
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science
| Description | To be used as reference to location, condition, variant where upon the subject property object statement is based. |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | references and qualifiers |
| Example 1 | Aadat (Q18255583) "has phenotype" abnormal neuron morphology (Q61731056) → Aadattm1Tag/Aadattm1Tag (Q61731631) |
| Example 2 | Aadat (Q18255583) "has phenotype" altered righting response (Q61731417) → Aadattm1Tag/Aadattm1Tag (Q61731631) |
| Example 3 | Aadat (Q18255583) "has phenotype" early eyelid opening (Q61731496) → Aadattm1Tag/Aadattm1Tag (Q61731631) |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
| See also | "has_phenotype" property proposal |
Motivation
[edit]This property proposal is related to the property proposal for "has phenotype". We would like to enrich Wikidata with genotype-phenotype data from MGI. The gene phenotype association is observed in a given genotype which we would like to capture as a reference using the "observed in" property proposal here. Andrawaag (talk) 22:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]
Support David (talk) 05:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)- The proposal mentions that it would also be used for qualifiers. In what situations would it be used like that? --Yair rand (talk) 21:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Yair rand: The examples presented are all uses as qualifiers of statements for the proposed "has phenotype" property. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- @ArthurPSmith: Oh, I thought those were supposed to be references. Where would this property be used as a reference, then? --Yair rand (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Yair rand: I want to use the property in references. The examples given should be read as being a reference. The reason I suggested using the property in both qualifiers and references it to leave room for extended usage of the property, but if we really need to be strict, let it be bound to references. --Andrawaag (talk) 20:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- I was also originally thinking that this would be for references, but thinking about this more I can also see the case for allowing this property to be used for qualifiers. So I agree with Andrawaag's suggestion -- I support allowing it on either, but binding it to references only if people feel it necessary... Andrew Su (talk) 00:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Yair rand: The examples presented are all uses as qualifiers of statements for the proposed "has phenotype" property. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support Andrew Su (talk) 00:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, ArthurPSmith, Andrew Su, Andrawaag, Yair rand: 
Done: observed in (P6531). − Pintoch (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)