Wikidata:Property proposal/maintain
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
maintain
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
Not done
| Description | item maintain by the organization |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | GLAM (Q1030034), archive (Q166118), library (Q7075), museum (Q33506) |
| Example 1 | Mémoires d'Ici (Q27488714) → Q57394958 |
| Example 2 | Royal Conservatory of Brussels (Q336968) → Heritage collections of the Royal Conservatory of Brussels (Q60217513) dont fait partie Jean-Lucien Hollenfeltz Fund (Q27042815) |
| Example 3 | National Archives and Records Administration (Q518155) → Records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (NAID 404) (Q59405045) |
| Planned use | WikiProject Archival Description, Infobox Lua, Atelier Archives et Wikidata |
| See also | maintained by (P126) |
Motivation
[edit]We are involve in a WikiProject Archival Description and we have impulse a Lua Infobox project in Wikipedia in French. A inverse proposal of maintained by (P126) is missing for us. We have already open a discussion on it in the bistrot in French but now we need it for complete our project of Lua Infobox. @Tomo8 5, Gilliane, Anchardo, LuciOle, Flor WMCH, MHM55: @Dominic, Shonagon, Beat Estermann: 2le2im-bdc (talk) 20:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]
Support David (talk) 07:04, 9 February 2019 (UTC)- Support Would be very helpful for building efficient & complete LUA infoboxes in relation with archives --Tomo8 5 (talk) 19:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Gilliane (talk) 15:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Amandine 10:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Anchardo 09:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Comment It seems to me that the second example should read: Example 2 = Royal Conservatory of Brussels (Q336968) → Heritage collections of the Royal Conservatory of Brussels (Q60217513). --MHM55 (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- It's right. I have change it. Thanks. --2le2im-bdc (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment We have given some clarifications on [bistrot] (in French) --2le2im-bdc (talk) 13:53, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Oppose inverse should be sufficient. --- Jura 08:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)- Oppose Current description doesn't say much about what the property is about that goes beyond the label. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 18:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. Unnecessary inverse. --Yair rand (talk) 01:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)