Wikidata:Property proposal/founded
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Try it! 
has founded
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
| Description | hat gegründet (de) – (Please translate this into English.) |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | mainly persons, companies, institutes |
| Allowed units | none |
| Example | has founded: William Booth (Q309882) -> The Salvation Army (Q188307) |
| Planned use | persons, who are founder of anything, need the property "has founded" or similar. There are so much persons in Wikidata, who are founder or co-founder of anything, but I could not find any similar property |
| Robot and gadget jobs | not yet |
| See also |
- Motivation
persons, who are founder or co-founder of anything, need the property "has founded" or similar. There are so much persons in Wikidata, who are founder of anything, but I could not find any similar property Doc Taxon (talk) 15:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
Oppose this would be an inverse property to founded by (P112); it really should not be needed. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)- Oppose per APS. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- but an inverse property is not been shown as property of the item, because if I open the item William Booth (Q309882) I cannot found the object The Salvation Army (Q188307), an object of relevance, founded by the item. Doc Taxon (talk) 17:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per the above. If you want to find these founded things, then run the appropriate query:
SELECT ?item ?itemLabel
{
?item wdt:P112 wd:Q309882 .
SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "de,en" }
}
LIMIT 1000
. (Incidentally, the pairing you mentioned is not present in Wikidata at all.) Mahir256 (talk) 03:02, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose as the sample isn't even present in Wikidata to other way round.
--- Jura 06:53, 2 August 2017 (UTC) - Oppose. Unneeded inverse. --Yair rand (talk) 02:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Doc Taxon: Not done, as the proposal has no support and broad opposition. ChristianKl (talk) 11:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)