User talk:Smalyshev (WMF)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Smalyshev (WMF)/Archive 1 on 2015-08-21.

This page will be moved and archived

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Hello

This is an important message regarding this page.

This page uses Structured Discussions/Flow, an obsolete tool that causes many maintenance problems. It has been decided to remove this tool from the wikis.

As of December 16, it will no longer be possible to add a new topic or post a message on this page.

Before this date, you can move or have this page moved to a subpage, in order to archive it. Once moved, this page will become a standard discussion page.

If you get this message on your personal talk page, it is probably because you turned Structured Discussions on, using the Beta features page. Please check there if you can to turn Structured Discussions off.

If you haven't moved this page by December 16, a script will automatically move the page to an archive page (the format will be Page name/Flow). The page using Structured Discussions/Flow will then be made read-only.

If you have any questions, please let me know!

Trizek_(WMF)

Reply to "This page will be moved and archived"

Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Greetings,

I'm following up on a message from earlier in the year about the prototype development for Special:MediaSearch. Based on community feedback, the Structured Data team has developed some new features for Special:MediaSearch and are seeking another round of comments and discussions about the tool. Commons:Structured_data/Media_search is updated with details about the new features plus some other development information, and feedback is welcome on Commons talk:Structured_data/Media_search. Media Search works in any language, so the team would especially appreciate input around support for languages other than English. I look forward to reading about what you think. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 01:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Reply to "Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round"

Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Greetings,

I'm following up on a message from earlier in the year about the prototype development for Special:MediaSearch. Based on community feedback, the Structured Data team has developed some new features for Special:MediaSearch and are seeking another round of comments and discussions about the tool. Commons:Structured_data/Media_search is updated with details about the new features plus some other development information, and feedback is welcome on Commons talk:Structured_data/Media_search. Media Search works in any language, so the team would especially appreciate input around support for languages other than English. I look forward to reading about what you think. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 00:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Reply to "Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round"

Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Greetings,

I'm following up on a message from earlier in the year about the prototype development for Special:MediaSearch. Based on community feedback, the Structured Data team has developed some new features for Special:MediaSearch and are seeking another round of comments and discussions about the tool. Commons:Structured_data/Media_search is updated with details about the new features plus some other development information, and feedback is welcome on Commons talk:Structured_data/Media_search. Media Search works in any language, so the team would especially appreciate input around support for languages other than English. I look forward to reading about what you think. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Reply to "Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Greetings,

The Structured Data team is working on an alternative, image-focused prototype for media search on Commons. The prototype uses categories, structured data as well as wikitext from Commons, and Wikidata to find its results. The development team would like your feedback on the prototype, as they are looking to work to further enhance the search experience on Commons. If you have a moment, please look over the project page set up on Commons to find a link to the prototype and leave your feedback on the talk page. Thanks for your time, I'll be posting message similar to this one to other pages on Commons. The team is looking forward to reading what you think. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Reply to "Commons - Media Search"

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging designs

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Structured Data - computer-aided tagging designs"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Structured Data - modeling data"

Help with Tora Wikidata:SPARQL federation input

3
Salgo60 (talkcontribs)

Hi you helped me with adding Nobelprize to the federation white list see change


I added TORA in 22 August 2019 and no feedback can you help me also this time?

phabricator T200066


Regards

Magnus Sälgö

Stockholm, Sweden

MisterSynergy (talkcontribs)

Stas has left his position at WMF and his account is globally locked. As far as I know, there is no direct successor for WDQS related matters yet...

Salgo60 (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Help with Tora Wikidata:SPARQL federation input"

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
The development team is starting work on one of the last planned features for SDC v1.0, a lightweight tool to suggest depicts tags for images. I've published a project page for it, please have a look. I plan to share this page with everyone on Commons much more broadly in the coming days. The tool has been carefully designed to try to not increase any workload on Commons volunteers; for starters, it will be opt-in for auto-confirmed users only and will not generate any sort of backlog here on Commons. Additionally, the tool is highly privacy-minded for the contributors and publicly-minded for the third party being used, in this case Google. The implementation and usage notes contain more information about these and other potential concerns as a starting place. It's really important that the tool is implemented properly from the start, so feedback is welcome. Questions, comments, concerns are welcome on the talk page and I will get answers as quickly as possible as things come up. On the talk page you can also sign up to make sure you're a part of the feedback for designs and prototype testing. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Reply to "Structured Data - computer-aided tagging"

changes missing in WDQS servers

7
MisterSynergy (talkcontribs)

Hey Stas (again)

There are sometimes changes which for whatever reason do not make it to the WDQS servers. As far as I know, you can somehow manually re-load complete items to the servers, or remove them from the servers if they have been deleted. Can we also do this as regular Wikidata users? If so, how? If not, would it be possible to make a tool that allows us to do this?

Thanks!

Smalyshev (WMF) (talkcontribs)

There's no tool (except for making another edit to the same item) but if you tell me where the problem is I could check it. It's not easy to make a user-accessible tool since it requires access that regular users would not have.

MisterSynergy (talkcontribs)

"Making another edit to the same item" is sometimes not so easy; unfortunately, we do not have "null edits" in Wikidata which one could make instead of actual changes.

There are quite a lot of problems, and I continuously stumple upon new ones. Deleted items which are still listed in the results months after deletion, or changes which are obviously missing on the servers. IMO it is not really feasible if Wikidata users have to contact you each time, thus I am asking for a tool. Would it be possible to provide some kind of an (internal) interface where a tool or gadget could report entity IDs (items, properties, or lexemes), and the actual re-loading process which requires elevated access rights was done somewhere internally on the server?

MisterSynergy (talkcontribs)

As there is no tool right now and it would probably take some time to make one in case it is possible, I report some items which need a purge anyways. They are all items which have been deleted a while ago, but they are listed in query results:

Q59829205, Q63052311, Q61055977, Q62778891, Q2895918, Q55659535, Q25632774, Q63058667, Q62781555, Q61138466, Q62008697, Q62781871, Q62713985, Q31828394, Q63069534, Q13178905, Q31828368, Q63040612, Q63074731, Q63081983, Q13046358, Q62780082, Q31828391, Q62702741, Q5686578, Q62721811, Q31828254, Q62676575, Q62675942, Q62717645, Q63075268, Q63041370, Q62781636, Q57792502, Q25390124, Q62777557, Q62986415, Q62716765, Q63065908, Q31828417, Q62698081, Q60995829, Q62703963, Q13183001, Q57793838, Q62750924, Q62734411, Q31828378, Q12962093, Q62703188, Q62772788, Q62667304, Q62716697, Q62753008, Q62728287, Q63036112, Q63120710, Q19682182, Q61117736, Q63067830, Q60578103, Q31828297, Q62752914, Q56327604, Q63068802, Q31828393, Q62667294, Q62755014, Q63065668, Q62738379, Q56306520, Q25538365, Q62754296, Q4229444, Q63084259, Q62705445, Q62747408, Q62724098, Q31828248, Q4229681, Q5281896, Q31828203, Q62476887, Q62675605, Q63007134, Q62734388, Q61059034, Q18815002, Q62765154, Q20086083, Q30526954, Q61129050, Q62761201, Q31828209, Q62690844, Q62706496, Q12111894, Q61118152, Q63043840, Q63066755, Q4291259, Q61359472, Q61131551, Q31344605, Q62762259, Q62766460, Q62752269, Q62690936, Q62667019, Q31828270, Q56415788, Q5793370, Q61118135, Q63077625, Q62745809, Q63077570, Q31828295, Q62746804, Q31828273, Q62719860, Q63343783, Q63065650, Q61123705, Q63065828, Q31828388, Q62792320, Q31828208, Q10878213, Q19730075, Q62702659, Q62709576, Q56312327, Q5151641, Q62708234, Q62988192, Q22236231, Q62764570, Q62588329, Q31840388, Q22906251, Q31828389, Q62755868, Q62713821, Q62987821, Q20084441, Q12962086, Q62762851, Q63064990, Q25678713, Q63043793, Q62675661, Q61065578, Q62702796, Q61117845, Q31828383, Q16962127, Q31828250, Q63065876, Q31828253, Q62703932, Q56321182, Q16437754, Q62711587, Q63079898, Q62738118, Q62705223, Q62750164, Q48961760, Q62695842, Q30893350, Q63121654, Q7195950, Q61065775, Q62704029, Q61082295, Q25708204, Q61061661, Q15925722, Q62688910, Q39096647, Q63079427, Q31828227, Q62711995, Q63044886, Q62758567, Q62749994, Q17047948, Q62754781, Q62751976, Q4105233, Q62736653, Q25691916, Q13025162, Q63069480, Q56309320, Q56306154, Q30892496, Q63043649, Q62706322, Q62700193, Q59618332, Q63033949, Q31828382, Q62751507, Q62760325, Q31828207, Q20086755

MisterSynergy (talkcontribs)

Something went wrong with this Structured Discussion thread. This post from earlier this evening is not displayed here properly, and it is missing in the topic history.

MisterSynergy (talkcontribs)

Here's a new batch of QIDs which should be reloaded to the WDQS servers (7 redirects and 42 deleted items):

Q20853277, Q28695917, Q32037287, Q32576285, Q32792041, Q33050456, Q37922564, Q2872686, Q16047840, Q25245306, Q31197865, Q56298752, Q60848444, Q60850122, Q60964533, Q63121999, Q64744514, Q65068861, Q65128001, Q65143971, Q65146067, Q65159508, Q65162116, Q65166842, Q65195036, Q65195116, Q65195200, Q65195297, Q65195597, Q65196057, Q65196640, Q65197353, Q65218926, Q65249871, Q65284233, Q65293943, Q65318251, Q65318268, Q65318285, Q65318435, Q65441491, Q65500943, Q65562355, Q65619923, Q65926234, Q65926756, Q65926793, Q65929161, Q65930233

Thanks!

Smalyshev (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Should be OK now, ping me if anything else is missing.