User talk:Ogmios

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Logo of Wikidata Welcome to Wikidata, Ogmios!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

--Ricordisamoa 13:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Example for Gewässerkennzahl (P1183)

[edit]

Hi Ogmios, property Gewässerkennzahl (P1183) was recently added at your request. You indicated GKZ= DE/48214 as an example of that property. Could you please:

  1. Actually assign Gewässerkennzahl (P1183) to the river or stream bearing code DE/48214 ?
  2. Fix the property documentation on Property talk:P1183, replacing "?? which item ??" by {{Q|nnnn}} of that item?

Thanks - LaddΩ chat ;) 18:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! You recently created that item, and gave an area based on OSM data. How did you come up with that measurement ? It seems off by two orders of magnitude. Alphos (talk) 20:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alphos,
I used the measurement tool from JOSM. Maybe I used the wrong factor. Thanks for cleanig it up. Ogmios (Tratsch) 20:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On it !
It was actually off by three orders of magnitude, 5.982 hectares are 58920 square meters
Thanks !
Alphos (talk) 20:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.
I guess, I have accidentially used the wrong multiplier. I'll check the other bogs. Ogmios (Tratsch) 21:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Population

[edit]

Please use male population (P1540) and female population (P1539) to specify male and female population, instead of using units. Thanks! Laboramus (talk) 22:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hint. I was looking for that information but I couldn't find it. Also thanks for changing that. 15:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Ogmios, da Wikisource keine Schlagwörter kennt, kann diese Information schlicht nicht aus WS importiert werden kann. Bitte nimm die Import-Fundstelle also wieder raus. Grüße --Dorades (talk) 09:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Dorades, Dass es um dieses Schlagwort geht, kann man aber aus dem Artikel leicht herauslesen. Wenn es als „import“ nicht akzeptabel ist, dann aber als „nachgewiesen in“. In dem Fall bitte nicht einfach die Arbeit anderer löschen, sondern korrigieren oder erst nachfragen. Ogmios (Tratsch) 12:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aber das ist doch Unsinn, in den beschreibenden Metadaten zu einem Artikel den Nachweis für ein Schlagwort im Artikel selbst anzugeben. Nirgends steht auf dieser Seite etwas von „Harzer Roller“ und weder Textbox noch Kategorie verweisen darauf. Deine (natürlich richtige) Schlagworterkennung ist eine Interpretation des Textes, die sich auf WS nicht wiederfindet. Warum verwendest du das Schlagwort nicht einfach ohne Eigenschaft? Ich habe nicht ohne Grund nur die Import-Fundstelle, nicht das Schlagwort an sich entfernt. --Dorades (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
„Nirgends steht auf dieser Seite etwas von „Harzer Roller““... Im Text geht es um die Kanarienvögel aus dem Harz. Die Rasse der Harzer Kanarienvögel werden als Harzer Roller bezeichnet. Ogmios (Tratsch) 14:58, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dann noch kürzer: Die wörtliche Nennung fehlt, die Verschlagwortung als Harzer Roller ist deine interpretatorische Leistung, die nicht aus der WS-Seite hervorgeht. --Dorades (talk) 15:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 18:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

[edit]
WMF Surveys, 01:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lustenau

[edit]

Hallo,


ich hab die Wappen-Darstellungen bewusst rausgenommen, weil dafür Löschanträge gestellt sind.

Gruß

Fränsmer (talk) 11:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Ogmios (Tratsch) 14:44, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ogmios,

Thanks for your help: I noticed you added a few statements with the above property. If possible, would you have a value we could add to them for determination method or standard (P459)? I think it could be either a tool or a (new) item describing the way it's done. Sample at Q55867161. --- Jura 10:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jura, I'd love to but what should I use? What I actually do is copying the content into a LibreOffice-Document pull the statistics. Ogmios (Tratsch) 11:41, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sounds good. I tried to re-do the same with the earlier OO at Q41556090, but got a difference of about 40 words. Maybe the algorithm is different or you include more parts than I (textbox??). Supposedly on a larger scale these minor differences don't matter, but it would be nice if the number were reproducible. Could you double-check your number? --- Jura 12:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

liegt in der Verwaltungseinheit (P131)

[edit]

Hallo Ogmios, du hattest bei einigen Dingen z.B. Q1659244 zusätzlich zu der bereits vorhandenen Verwaltungseinheit eine weitere, höhere eingetragen. Ich mache das teilweise rückgängig weil bei den Regeln (Hinweis zur Benutzung) zu Property:P131 steht dass nur die unterste Ebene eingetragen werden soll. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 13:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jo, Danke für den Hinweis. Ogmios (Tratsch) 14:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We sent you an e-mail

[edit]

Hello Ogmios,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email [email protected].

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Call for participation in a task-based online experiment

[edit]

Dear Ogmios,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender system that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our system based on your previous edits. Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.

The study will start in early March 2022, and it should take no more than 30 minutes. If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at [email protected] or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSees9WzFXR0Vl3mHLkZCaByeFHRrBy51kBca53euq9nt3XWog/viewform?usp=sf_link

I will contact you with the link to start the study.

For more information about the study, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa

In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Kholoudsaa (talk) 23:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Webseite Clausthal-Zellerfeld

[edit]

Hallo Omigos, du hast den Eintrag "www.Samtgemeinde-Oberharz.de" wieder hergestellt, darf ich nach dem Grund fragen? Es existert diese Seite nicht mehr und auch die Samtgemeinde gibt es nicht mehr. --Blacky75 (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Blacky75, Angaben die nur bis zu einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt korrekt waren, werden mit einem Entzeitpunkt versehen. Clausthal ist auch nicht mehr teil des Landkreises Zellerfeld aber statt die Information zu löschen, wird angegeben bis wann es Teil dieses LKs war und dazu ab wann es Teil eines anderen LKs war. Gruß, Ogmios (Tratsch) 12:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]