Talk:Q83210
Autodescription — Golan Heights (Q83210)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Golan Heights” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for administrative territorial entities
This list of queries is designed for all instances of administrative territorial entity (Q56061). It is generated using {{TP administrative area}}
.
- Places in Golan Heights (query)
- Map of places in Golan Heights (query)
- List of monuments (Monumental (Q29167605))
- List of places ordered by altitude (query) (elevation above sea level (P2044))
- Count of buildings by architectural style (query)
- List of highest buildings (query) (height (P2048))
- Organizations with headquarters in Golan Heights (query)
- List of items which have power over or which apply to Golan Heights (query) (applies to jurisdiction (P1001))
- People born in Golan Heights, sorted by number of sitelinks (query)
- Main occupation of people born in Golan Heights (query)
- People dead in Golan Heights, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of death (P20))
- People buried in Golan Heights, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (place of burial (P119))
- People living in Golan Heights, sorted by number of sitelinks (query) (residence (P551))
- List of items with narrative location in Golan Heights (query) (narrative location (P840))
- List of movies with filming location in Golan Heights (query) (filming location (P915))
- See also: Wikidata:WikiProject Country subdivision
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
@Liuxinyu970226: Which law or legal evidence was you talking about when you claim JordanSyria have de jure ownership over Golan Heights? C933103 (talk) 08:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- @C933103: He should answer your question, but please note that, except the Trump-controlling United States, there are entirely no other countries agree that this area is an Israel territory, instead they (even European Union, APEC except USA, G20 except USA, NATO except USA and OPEC) still support Syria's legal role here, so please do not remove Country=Syria at the moment, unless if you have evidences that Syria does entirely loss their controlled areas, and entirely loss their international recognizations. --117.13.95.116 09:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Remember that this area is truely "Internationally recognized as Syrian territory occupied by Israel", not just an entire Israel territory. --117.13.95.116 09:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- @C933103: If you don't say sorry about your removal, and revert (just if you did so once), then I will report your edits to emergency-{@}-wikimedia.org, and then, you know what you will be sanctioned by them. --117.13.95.116 09:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- @117.13.95.116:But then is "internationally recognized by all other countries" same as "de jure"? I would not oppose if you use other appropriate quantifiers to add Syria back to P17 of this feature. C933103 (talk) 09:42, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- @C933103: Yes, that's a facet of meaning of "De jure" Latin word, unless if you fully know that Latin word, please do not remove again and again. Thx. --60.26.9.220 00:57, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @60.26.9.220: What??? "De jure" mean "according to law", "internationally recognized by all other countries" doesn't mean "according to law". Of course it can be both, but then again it is not necessary. Again please show your sources.C933103 (talk) 03:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @C933103: Yes, please see Constitution of Syria (Q2484340), that already explained the legal status of Syria in this area. --60.26.9.220 08:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @60.26.9.220: What??? "De jure" mean "according to law", "internationally recognized by all other countries" doesn't mean "according to law". Of course it can be both, but then again it is not necessary. Again please show your sources.C933103 (talk) 03:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @C933103: Yes, that's a facet of meaning of "De jure" Latin word, unless if you fully know that Latin word, please do not remove again and again. Thx. --60.26.9.220 00:57, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @117.13.95.116:But then is "internationally recognized by all other countries" same as "de jure"? I would not oppose if you use other appropriate quantifiers to add Syria back to P17 of this feature. C933103 (talk) 09:42, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
الإحداثيات
[edit]يبدو أن خريطة الشارع المفتوحة تعرض كامل الهضبة داخل دولة إسرائيل وهوَ انحياز خاطئ لا أساس له ولا يمكن اعتماده في ويكي بيانات. الهضبة وفق القرارت الدولية تقع ضمن حدود سوريا، وجميع مواقع الخرائط تضع حدودها ضمن سوريا مع تبيين خطوط وقف إطلاق النار والمنطقة منزوعة السلاح، لكن القائمين على خريطة الشارع المفتوحة يصرون على الانفصال عن الواقع وإدراج وجهات نظرهم في الخرائط، لذا لا يمكن الاعتماد عليهم هنا. Philip Ib (talk) 12:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC)