Property talk:P8613

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• String length
• List of qualifiers
• Count

Regesta Ecclesiastica Salisburgensia ID
identifier of the Regesta Ecclesiastica Salisburgensia biographical Wiki

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Format “[1-9]\d{0,6}”: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8613#Format, hourly updated report, SPARQL

Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8613#Entity types

Conflicts with “instance of (P31): Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q4167410), Wikimedia category (Q4167836), Wikimedia template (Q11266439), Wikimedia list article (Q13406463)”: this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8613#Conflicts with P31, hourly updated report, SPARQL

Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8613#Unique value, hourly updated report, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)

Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8613#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL

Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8613#Single value, SPARQL

Item “religion or worldview (P140)”: Items with this property should also have “religion or worldview (P140)”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8613#Item P140, search, SPARQL

scope

User:Eihel has reverted a recent edit edit citing the following reason: Please look at the property description and property proposal discussion: there are only human Items. The items you add are not, so you have to remove the item identifier and not transform prop. In addition, he deleted all non-human identifiers, even though they have been around for months and were added shortly after the property was accepted.

I disagree with this course of action. The Wiki contains several non-human entries. It’s unclear to me why we shouldn’t include them into Wikidata as they might come in handy.

As for the formal arguments: The property description says identifier of the Regesta Ecclesiastica Salisburgensia biographical Wiki. The phrase “biographical wiki” doesn’t necessarily mean that only persons can be covered, just that the focus lies on persons. While the property proposal does mention the domain human (Q5), it’s not uncommon for a property to broaden its focus.

@Mfchris84, Epìdosis, Hannes Röst, Bargioni: Thoughts? --Emu (talk) 22:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello Emu , For this kind of modification, >>>as long as the discussion is initiated and accepted by the community<<<, I'm fine. —Eihel (talk) 23:02, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Tobias1984 Mfchris84 Katjos phaebz Jean-Frédéric PeterTheOne Gittenburg M2k~dewiki emu Haansn08 Maincomb

Notified participants of WikiProject Austria

Nojhan Yair rand Runner1928 TomT0m Capankajsmilyo ArthurPSmith John Carter Tris T7 Epìdosis Peter17 Bargioni Geogast Clifford Anderson Bello Na'im Mathieu Kappler Maxime StarTrekker Amqui Loft-ind

Notified participants of WikiProject Religions —Eihel (talk) 23:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Support broadening the scope. --Epìdosis 22:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Strong support - unfortunately this discussion is only based on my fault, creating the proposal a long time ago. i haven't noticed that not only humans are described in RES. So please let us remove this restrictions to human (Q5) and let's go ahead! --Mfchris84 (talk) 07:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for not only Q5, thx. -- Bargioni 🗣 09:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)