Property talk:P4264

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentation

LinkedIn company or organization ID
identifier for an official company, school, organisation page, or showcase page, on LinkedIn
RepresentsLinkedIn company or organization profile (Q125207805)
Applicable "stated in" valueLinkedIn (Q213660)
Data typeExternal identifier
Domain
According to this template: companies and other organisations
According to statements in the property:
organization (Q43229), metropolitan area (Q1907114), website (Q35127), project (Q170584), service (Q7406919), technology park (Q1281153), sports venue (Q1076486) or brand (Q431289)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values[a-z\d][a-z\d-]+[a-z\d]
ExampleBritish Airways (Q8766)british-airways
LinkedIn (Q213660)linkedin
Brazilian Red Cross (Q47072433)cruzvermelhabrasileira
Sourcehttps://www.linkedin.com/
External linksUse in sister projects: [ar][de][en][es][fr][he][it][ja][ko][nl][pl][pt][ru][sv][vi][zh][commons][species][wd][en.wikt][fr.wikt].
Formatter URLhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/$1/
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P4264 (Q43543158)
Related to country United States of America (Q30) (See 771 others)
See alsoLinkedIn personal profile ID (P6634)
Lists
Proposal discussionProposal discussion
Current uses
Total31,534
Main statement30,88397.9% of uses
Qualifier1730.5% of uses
Reference4781.5% of uses
Search for values
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4264#Single value, SPARQL
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4264#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Format “[\p{Ll}0-9&_'.-]+: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4264#Format, SPARQL
Format “[^\s/]+: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4264#Format, SPARQL
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4264#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Conflicts with “website account on (P553): LinkedIn (Q213660): this property must not be used with the listed properties and values. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4264#Conflicts with P553, search, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P4264#Entity types
This property is being used by:

Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Discussion

[edit]
[edit]

I use this property for SMATRICS GmbH & Co KG (Q87212466). The correct link is this one. The only problem is that converts a & to a %26 and a ? to a %3F. If this wouldn't happen, the link would work. Any ideas for fixes? --D-Kuru (talk) 01:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

required qualifier constraint: online access status

[edit]

A lot of LinkedIn accounts qualify for registration required. - Coagulans (talk) 11:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If registration required or not to view content often depends on user agents and previous visits, I can often see an account on one device but not another one, or can bypass login by using another browser... Is there any company pages that always requires login? Abbe98 (talk) 19:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Before adding this as a constraint, I would like to see at least one account that is universally not accessible. I'll revert until such proof is posted. Ainali (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ainali, Abbe98: I see we've been discussing this in two places --Azertus (talk) 12:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There does not seem to be consensus, nor is it actually clear if it's valid for LinkedIn accounts. I don't have LinkedIn and have yet to be unable to access an account. Feel free to point to an account which is universally inaccessible. Abbe98 (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you read the linked discussion, you'll see I share your arguments ;-) --Azertus (talk) 15:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I mistakenly addressed OP. Abbe98 (talk) 10:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]