Property talk:P1464
Documentation
category item that groups people born in this place
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Target required claim P971, SPARQL
if [item A] has this property (category for people born here (P1464)) linked to [item B],
then [item B] should also have property “category combines topics (P971)” linked to [item A]. (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#inverse, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Item P17, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Single value, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Type Q618123, Q82794, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Item P625, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464#Entity types
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
Discussion
[edit]Make sense
[edit]Why don't we have simply a have a class "people born in whatever" which would have a definition like "people with a <born in: Whatever> statement and a "people born in whatever" <category : Category:People born in whatever> ? I think these kind of properties are useless. author TomT0m / talk page 14:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- What's different from last time you asked the question? --- Jura 14:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Remind me, what was the answer? author TomT0m / talk page 14:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Strange bug in Constraint
[edit]Hi,
There is a {{Constraint:Type|classes=Q7703766, Q7275|relation=instance}} but apparently something is wrong (though this syntax is give as an example on Template:Constraint:Type) as a lot of territory (Q7703766) are listed as violation on Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P1464. Right now, there is 16254 violations on 16762 uses, near 97%...
Could someone see what is wrong and why ? Poke Ivan A. Krestinin
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 18:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, fixed, redirects are not supported in constraints. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 19:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- All Properties
- Properties with wikibase-item-datatype
- Properties used on 10000+ items
- Properties with conflicts with constraints
- Properties with constraints on type
- Properties with target required claim constraints
- Properties with inverse constraints
- Properties with constraints on items using them
- Properties with unique value constraints
- Properties with single value constraints
- Properties with scope constraints
- Properties with entity type constraints