Performance Appraisal

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 56
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that performance appraisal refers to procedures used to evaluate an employee's personality, performance and potential. Different methods discussed include weighted checklist, forced choice, graphic rating scale, behaviorally anchored rating scale, MBO and field review.

The different types of performance appraisal methods discussed include weighted checklist, forced choice, graphic rating scale, behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS), MBO, ranking, paired comparison, forced distribution and field review technique.

Some characteristics of an effective performance appraisal system mentioned are that it is a step-by-step process, examines employee strengths and weaknesses scientifically and objectively, is ongoing and continuous, and secures information for making correct decisions on employees.

Performance Appraisal

Amit Sharma B.Tech, MBA, SAP(HR), PHR|SHRM [email protected]

Performance Appraisal :
Performance Appraisal (PA) refers to all those procedures that are used to evaluate the personality, performance, potential, of its group members

Relationship between jab analysis and performance Job analysis performance performance appraisal:
standards Describes work & Personnel Requirement Of a particular job appraisal Describes the Job relevant strengths and weakness of Each individual Translate job Into levels of To acceptable Or unacceptable performance

Question arises?

Why do we measure performance? Effective performance appraisal systems How do we measure performance?

Characteristics
It

is a step by step process It examine the employee strengths and weaknesses Scientific and objective study Ongoing and continuous process Secure information for making correct decisions on employees

Needs and Objectives:


Provide

feedback about employees Provide database Diagnose the S & W of individuals Provide coaching, counseling, career planning to subordinates Develop positive relation and reduce grievance Facilitates research in personnel management

Appraisal Benefits (cont.)

Appraisals offer employees:


Direction Feedback Input Motivation

Appraisal Benefits
Appraisals

offer the
Development

company:
Documentation Employee Feedback Legal

protection Motivation system

Why Appraisals Are Important

Recognize accomplishments Guide progress Improve performance

Why Important (cont.)


Review

performance Set goals Identify problems Discuss career advancement

Steps in performance appraisal


Establishing job standards Designing an appraisal programme Appraise performance Performance interview Use appraisal data For appropriate purpose

Process of PA
Taking corrective standards Setting performance standards Communicatin g standards Measuring standards Comparing standards

Discussing results

Issues in appraisal system


Formal and informal What methods? When to evaluate? What to evaluate? How to solve? Appraisal Design? Whose performance? Who are the raters? What problems?

What to evaluate? (Philip Model)

H Potenti al L L

Problem children Planned separatio n Performanc e

star s Social citize n H

How PA contribute to firms competitive advantages


Improving performanc e Values and behavior Competitiv e advantage

Making correct decision

Minimizing dissatisfaction And turnover

Ensuring legal competence

1.

Problems in performance appraisal


Errors In rating Halo effects Stereotyping Central tendency Constant error Personal bias Spill over effect

2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Problems in performance appraisal (Contd) Incompetence


Negative approach Multiple objectives Resistance Lack of knowledge

Essentials of an effective appraisal system


Mutual trust Clear objectives Standardizations Training Job relatedness Documentation Feedback and participation Individual differences Post appraisal review Review and appeal

Appraisals and Discrimination


Title ADA Other Laws

VII fair employment

Discrimination (cont.)
Failure

to communicate standards Failure to give timely feedback Failure to allow employees to correct performance Inconsistency in measuring performance Failure to document performance objectively

Define

performance expectations Describe measurement tools Use a rating system Cover specific examples Set measurable goals

Appraisal Forms

Measure Performance
Measurement

systems need to

be: Specific Fair Consistent Clear Useful

Measure Performance (cont.)


Systems can be: Numerical Textual Management by Objective (MBO) Behavior oriented

Make

sure documentation is objective Document performance of all employees Provide complete and accurate information Document performance on a regular basis

Document Performance

Based

on job requirements Realistic Measurable Observable Challenging Prioritized

Set Goals.

Employee Input

Employees

take an active role:

Setting goals Designing action plans Identifying strengths and weaknesses Employees participate in the PA meeting

Preparation
Employees: Review performance Think about new goals

Preparation (cont.)

Supervisors:
Review

performance Complete written appraisal Think about new goals Schedule time and place

Start the Meeting


Lay

out agenda Talk about money Encourage input Give good news first

During the Meeting


Review performance: Based on previous goals Noting strengths and accomplishments Identifying areas for improvement

Focus

on the professional Give objective examples Invite response Listen actively Create we mentality

Presentation Tips

During the Meeting (cont.)


Set

goals: Based on company goals Building on areas that need improvement

End the Meeting


Encourage

good performance Lay out action plan Communicate outcome of goals not met Confirm understanding

Continuous Feedback
Formal

appraisals Informal appraisals Open communication

Recognize Good Performance


Verbal Public Tangible Monetary

Identify Poor Performance


Act

early Take the right approach Deal with employee reaction Handle continued poor performance

Discipline Poor Performance


Recognize

problems Talk with employee Follow company policy

Handle Hard Cases


Reviewing

highly emotional

employees Rating former peers

Key Points to Remember


You

must conduct objective appraisals on a scheduled basis. tell employees how theyre doing and how they can improve. help create a system of motivation and rewards based on performance.

Appraisals

Appraisals

Performance Appraisal Methods


Individual

Evaluation Methods

Confidential

report Essay evaluation Critical incidents Checklists Graphic rating scale Behaviorally anchored rating scale MBO

Critical Incident method


Ex: A fire, sudden breakdown, accident Workers reaction A B C D E scale

informed the supervisor immediately 5 Become anxious on loss of output 4 tried to repair the machine 3 Complained for poor maintenance 2 was happy to forced test 1

Checklist method
Simple checklist method Weighted checklist method Forced choice method

Simple checklist method: Is employee regular Y/N Is employee respected by subordinate Y/N Is employee helpful Y/N Does he follow instruction Y/N

Weighted checklist method


weights performance rating (scale 1 to 5 ) Regularity 0.5 Loyalty 1.5 Willing to help 1.5 Quality of work 1.5 Relationship 2.0

Forced choice method


Criteria Rating 1.Regularity on the job Most Least Always regular Inform in advance for delay Never regular Remain absent Neither regular nor irregular

Graphic Rating Scale


Continuous Rating Scale Discontinuous Rating Scale Employee name_________ Deptt_______ Raters name ___________ Date________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------Exc. Good Acceptable Fair Poor 5 4 3 2 1 _ Dependability Initiative Overall output Attendance Attitude Cooperation

Indifferen t
Attitud e

Enthusiasti c

No Interes t

Intereste d Discontinuous Rating Scale

Very enthusiast ic

BARS( behaviorally Anchored rating scale)


Step 1. Step 2. Step 3. Step 4. Step 5. Identify critical incidents Select performance dimension Retranslate the incidents Assign scales to incidents Develop final instrument

MBO Process
Set

organizational goals Defining performance target Performance review feedback

Performance Appraisal Methods


Group

Appraisal

Ranking Paired

comparison Forced distribution Performance tests Field review technique

Ranking method

Employee Rank A B C D E 2 1 3 5 4

Paired comparison method


A B C D E Final Rank A - - - + + 3 B + + + 2 + + 1 + 4 5

C + + D E -

No of Positive evaluation Total no. of evaluation * 100 = employee superior evaluation

Forced Distribution method

No. of employee s

10% 20% poo r

40%

20%

10% Excellen t

Below averag goo averag e d e Force distribution curve

Field review method


Performance Dimension Leadership Communication Interpersonal skills Decision making Technical skills Motivation subordinate peers ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ superiorcustomer ^

Performance criteria for executives


For

top managers

Return

on capital employed Contribution to community development Degree of upward communication from middlelevel executives Degree of growth and expansion of enterprise.

For middle level managers


Departmental

performance Coordination among employees Degree of upward communication from supervisors Degree of clarity about corporate goals and policies

For supervisors
Quality

period Labor cost per unit of output in a given period Material cost per unit in a given period Rate of absenteeism and turnover of employees No of accidents in a given period

and quantity of output in a given

You might also like