Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 926 views

    Equipment Criticality Ranking

    Uploaded by

    Jerome Morta
    The document discusses Pfizer Global Manufacturing's Equipment Criticality Ranking tool, which assigns criticality values to equipment based on factors like product importance, availability, impact, alternative options, and ease of repair in order to prioritize maintenance strategies. Equipment is ranked on a scale of 0.5 to 5, and minimum thresholds are established to ensure criticality rankings are not too low based on safety, environmental, or quality risks. Different maintenance strategies and tasks are assigned based on the criticality ranking.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Equipment Criticality Ranking

    Uploaded by

    Jerome Morta
    926 views8 pages
    The document discusses Pfizer Global Manufacturing's Equipment Criticality Ranking tool, which assigns criticality values to equipment based on factors like product importance, availability, impact, alternative options, and ease of repair in order to prioritize maintenance strategies. Equipment is ranked on a scale of 0.5 to 5, and minimum thresholds are established to ensure criticality rankings are not too low based on safety, environmental, or quality risks. Different maintenance strategies and tasks are assigned based on the criticality ranking.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses Pfizer Global Manufacturing's Equipment Criticality Ranking tool, which assigns criticality values to equipment based on factors like product importance, availability, impact, alternative options, and ease of repair in order to prioritize maintenance strategies. Equipment is ranked on a scale of 0.5 to 5, and minimum thresholds are established to ensure criticality rankings are not too low based on safety, environmental, or quality risks. Different maintenance strategies and tasks are assigned based on the criticality ranking.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    926 views8 pages

    Equipment Criticality Ranking

    Uploaded by

    Jerome Morta
    The document discusses Pfizer Global Manufacturing's Equipment Criticality Ranking tool, which assigns criticality values to equipment based on factors like product importance, availability, impact, alternative options, and ease of repair in order to prioritize maintenance strategies. Equipment is ranked on a scale of 0.5 to 5, and minimum thresholds are established to ensure criticality rankings are not too low based on safety, environmental, or quality risks. Different maintenance strategies and tasks are assigned based on the criticality ranking.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 8

    Pfizer Global Manufacturing Nutrition

    Equipment Criticality Ranking

    A collaboration between: E&M, PPU & TS May 17, 2010

    Equipment Criticality Defined


    Equipment Criticality is a value assigned to each asset indicating its importance within the Workcenter or plant

    Purpose
    To prioritize assets accordingly based on the factors:
    Product/Utility/Facility importance Equipment availability Length of impact Alternative options Ease of repair

    Equipment Criticality Ranking Tool (ECRT)


    The ECRT asks a series of categorical questions to determine the Equipment Criticality Ranking. All equipment is ranked on a scale of 0.5 to 5 where 5 is the most critical. The ranking is then used to specify an appropriate Maintenance Strategy. These rankings are also used to prioritize long term equipment issues across the site.

    ECRT Calculations
    Each category is weighted as follows:
    20% - Product / Utility / Facility Importance 20% - Equipment Availability to Maintenance 20% - Work Center Impact including: Constrained Work Centers (Bottleneck) 10% Length of Impact 10% 20% - Alternative Options including: Additional Manpower 6.7% Alternative Routing 6.7% Spare Availability 6.7% 20% - Ease of Repair including: Replaceability 6.7% Replacement Value 6.7% Maintenance Costs 6.7%

    ECRT Thresholds
    Minimum Thresholds (minimum required ranking) have been established to insure that the Equipment Criticality Ranking is not too low based on Safety, Environmental or Quality risks. When the Threshold Applies:
    If the initial criticality ranking is greater than the threshold, the greater number will apply. If the initial criticality ranking is less than the threshold, the final criticality ranking will default to the threshold limit.

    Selecting a Maintenance Strategy


    The Maintenance Strategy is defined by the Equipment Criticality Ranking.
    Ranking 4.5 5.0 3.5 4.5 2.5 3.5 1.5 2.5 0.5 1.5 Strategy Platinum Gold Silver Bronze Lead

    Maintenance Tasks Based on Given Strategy


    Strategy
    Criticality Ranking Platinum 4.50-5.00 Gold 3.50-4.49 Silver 2.50-3.49 Bronze 1.50-2.49 Lead 0.50-1.49

    Reliability Analysis
    Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) FMEA Reliability Plan

    x x x x x x

    Maintenance Activity
    CBM PM Equipment Training Spare Parting

    x x x x

    x x x x

    x x x x x x x

    Continuous Improvement
    Performance Tracking Detailed RCFA

    x x

    x x

    Proposed Team:
    No.

    Area
    PPU EM RE EHS QA PM

    Process 1
    TBD TBD AEZ

    Process 2
    TBD TBD JPD

    Remarks
    TBD TBD

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    C. Adawag D. Gorrecho JRL / JLB

    When: May 22, 2010 (Saturday) Time: 0600H 1400H Where: Engg Conference Room

    You might also like