Project Planning and Scheduling

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

The most effective

project scheduling
technique in
project management
Project managers juggle expectations from
stakeholders with the resources available to complete
the project.
Scheduling is one of the most important things a
project manager needs to navigate.

A project schedule clearly defines project activities,


milestones, deliverables, and objectives.

Read on to learn why schedule management is so


important, some of the best project scheduling
techniques, and how to effectively implement a
CPM: Critical Path Method

The Critical Path Method (CPM) is common in


construction, an industry with projects that have
many moving pieces.

The critical path in project management organizes a


project according to the longest path of task
dependencies.

Tasks that have no dependencies are called floating


tasks and don’t affect the time frame for delivery.
For example, if you are developing an app, one part of
the project is to develop the user interface.

CPM helps you understand what smaller tasks your


project team must complete in order to tackle the
user interface.

This can help a reader immediately understand the


order of operations.
Pros
• A clear understanding of task
dependencies.

• Makes it obvious which steps need to be


completed first.

• Floating tasks provide some opportunity


for flexibility.
Cons

• A linear approach .

• Makes it hard to conceptualize what tasks


your team can do in parallel .

• Little flexibility built in for delays .


Program Evaluation and Review Technique
(PERT)

PERT is a risk analysis technique that takes into account different


timelines.

A PERT analysis calculates three possible outcomes from there:

1. Optimistic timing (O): The fastest time possible to complete


the project.

2. Most likely timing (M): A realistic estimate for completion if


nothing goes wrong.
A final time estimate is given by creating a weighted average of
the three timelines, using the following formula:

(O+4M+P)/6.

PERT charts have the flexibility to account for all outcomes built
in.

Pros:
•A mathematical approach to planning for project delays.

•You can share all three outcomes with shareholders, for increased
transparency and managing expectations.

•The pessimistic outcome provides a starting point for a revised timeline in


Cons:
• Not all possible delays are known for
an accurate pessimistic timeline.

• Easy to underestimate the effect of


delays.

• Doesn’t provide a solution for avoiding


delays.

You might also like