0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views45 pages

Pie 1

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 45

Eosinophilic Lung Disease

EOSINOPHIL

- Two-lobed, polymorphonuclear leukocyte, 12 to 15 um.

- Stains red with Eosin, a red dye. (granules)

- Granules consists of
 Histamines,
 Proteins such as eosinophil peroxidase, RNAse,
DNAse, lipase, plasminogen & major basic protein.
WHAT’S NORMAL

 *The normal AEC : <500/mm3 .


 Mild eosinophilia : 500-1500/mm3
 Moderate eosinophilia : 1500-5000/mm3
 Severe eosinophilia : > 5000/mm3

**Bronchoscopy (BAL) EOS %


 Normal volunteers < 2%
 Increased >5%
 Primary pulmonary eosinophilic syndromes >20-25%
*
Definition: Eosinophilic pneumonias are defined as
a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized
by varying degrees of pulmonary parenchymal or
blood eosinophilia.

Also called pulmonary infiltrates with


eosinophilia(PIE)or eosinophilic pneumonia
The precise role of eosinophils in the pathogenesis
of the eosinophilic pneumonias is not clear However
 Initiation
 Perpetuation

 Amplification of tissue inflammation

 Injury

have been attributed to eosinophils


Diseases Associated with
Pulmonary Infiltrates & Eosinophilia

 Pulmonary Eosinophilic Syndromes of Known Cause

 Pulmonary Eosinophilic Syndromes of Unknown


Cause

 Other Lung Diseases Variably Associated with


Eosinophilia
Pulmonary Eosinophilic Syndromes of Known Cause:

 Parasitic-induced eosinophilic pneumonias (including


Loeffler’s syndrome)

 Drug-or toxin-induced eosinophilic pneumonias

 Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia

 Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis


Pulmonary Eosinophilic Syndromes of Unknown Cause

 Idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia

 Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia

 Churg-Strauss syndrome (allergic granulomatosis and


angiitis)

 Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome


Other Lung Diseases Variably Associated with Eosinophilia

 Asthma/allergy

 Bronchocentric granulomatosis

 Bronchiolitis obliterans-organizing pneumonia

 Infections –
– Fungal (Coccidioidomycosis, Aspergillus,P. jirovecii)
– Tuberculosis,Viral
Other Lung Diseases Variably Associated with Eosinophilia

 Interstitial lung disease:


- Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- Collagen-vascular disease associated Sarcoidosis
- Eosinophilic granuloma (pulmonary histiocytosis X)

 Malignancy:
- Non-small-cell cancer of lung
- Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
- Myeloblastic leukemia

Miscellaneous (lung transplantation, ulcerative colitis)


1. Loeffler’s syndrome
Also called as Simple Pulmonary Eosinophila
In 1932 Loffler first described it as a clinical syndrome
characterized by
 Mild respiratory symptoms
 Peripheral blood eosinophilia
 Transient, migratory pulmonary infiltrates
Immune hypersensitivity to Ascaris lumbricoides and
other parasites
Affects people of all ages
Clinical features
 Low-grade fever
 Nonproductive cough
 Dyspnea (mild to severe)

The pulmonary manifestations begin
approximately 9 to 12 days following ingestion
and occur during the migration of larvae through
the lung.
Respiratory manifestations are self limited,
resolving in 1 to 2 wks
Peripheral blood from patients reveals moderate
to extreme eosinophilia.
Expectorated sputum, if present, frequently
contains eosinophils and Charcot–Leyden crystals
Chest X ray shows
 Transient, migratory, nonsegmental interstitial & alveolar
infiltrates(often peripheral or pleural based)

Pulmonary function evaluation typically reveals a


mild to moderate restrictive ventilatory defect
Ascaris larvae may be identified in sputum or
gastric aspirates during the pneumonic phase
of disease.
Stool examination for ova and parasites is
typically negative until 8 weeks after the
onset of the respiratory syndrome.
Lung histology shows striking eosinophilic
infiltration of interstitium and alveolar-
capillary units
Loeffler’s syndrome
TREATMENT
 Since Loeffler’s syndrome may be induced by a variety of
exposures, a search for an etiologic agent should be
undertaken.
 Bronchodilators and rarely corticosteroids may be used for
alleviation of Pulmonary symptoms, although these are usually
self-limited.
In cases due to Ascaris, treatment with oral mebendazole (100
mg twice a day for 3 days) should be given to prevent late GI
manifestations of Ascaris infestation, which may include
malnutrition, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and/or intestinal
obstruction typically 8 weeks or more after onset of
respiratory symptoms.
Since stool specimens are negative for ova and parasites early in
the illness, clinical follow-up over a 2- to 3-month period is
Strongyloidiasis

Strongyloides is widely distributed in the


tropical and subtropical regions. Following
initial transcutaneous infection, a Loeffler-
like syndrome may occur as larvae migrate
through the lungs.
 Chronic strongyloidiasis occurs as a result of
autoinfection, whereby the noninfectious
rhabditiform larvae transform within the GI
tract into infectious filariform larvae,
penetrate the colonic wall or perianal skin,
and reinfect the host.
Chronic strongyloidiasis may be associated with
recurrent asthma-like symptoms that may worsen
with the administration of corticosteroids. The
hyperinfection syndrome results from accelerated
autoinfection, and usually occurs in persons with
defects in cell-mediated immunity (such as
lymphoma, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]
or human-T lymphotropic virus type 1 [HTLV-1]
infection, and with chronic corticosteroid use), as
well as in persons with underlying GI disease,
chronic lung disease,malnutrition, and use of H2
blockers or antacids.
Respiratory manifestations include cough,
dyspnea,chronic bronchitis, wheezing,
hemoptysis, and patchy pulmonary infiltrates,
in association with blood eosinophilia. Rarely,
acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
has been reported in patients with
hyperinfection
Diagnosis

The diagnosis of Strongyloides infection may


be established by identification of larvae in
sputum, BAL fluid, bronchial brushings, or
transbronchial biopsy specimens, pleural
fluid or stool. Several stool samples are often
required to identify the pathogen.Serologic
testing, such as ELISA to detect IgG antibody
to Strongyloides stercoralis can also be used
to establish a diagnosis
Thiabendazole (25 mg/kg twice a day for 2
days) or ivermectin (200 μg/kg given orally
for 1–2 days) may be used for the treatment
of uncomplicated or disseminated
strongyloidias. ivermectin is generally better
tolerated in terms of side effects
2. Drug and
toxin
induced
eosinophilic
pneumonia
Several drugs have been implicated, many
are commonly used
Acetylsalicylic acid L-Tryptophan

Amiodarone Methotrexate
Bleomycin Minocycline
Captopril Nitrofurantoin
Carbamazepine Penicillamin
Propylthiouracil Phenytoin
Sulfasalazine Gold salts
Drug and toxin induced eosinophilic pneumonia

Other causes are


Radiation therapy for breast cancer
Iodinated contrast agents
Heroin (inhaled)
Have an acute or subacute onset and are not
always related to either the cumulative dose of
drug used or the duration of treatment.
Respiratory symptoms vary widely in severity,
from a mild Loeffler’s-like symptoms(dyspnea,
cough & fever) to severe fulminant respiratory
failure.
Wheezing may be present, but obstructive
physiology is not common on pulmonary function
testing.
A diagnosis of drug- or toxin-induced eosinophilic
pneumonia is based upon a careful review of
drug and other exposures (including
nonprescription drugs, herbal preparations,
street drugs, and environmental exposures).
Other causes of eosinophilic lung disease should
be excluded.
A concomitant skin rash and pleural effusion can
support the diagnosis of drug-induced
eosinophilic pneumonia.
The DRESS syndrome consists of acute
eosinophilic pneumonia with drug rash and
systemic manifestations.
Although radiographic findings are not
specific, interstitial or alveolar infiltrates are
typically evident on chest radiograph and
common high-resolution chest computed
tomographic (HRCT) findings include
bilateral consolidation and ground-glass
opacities, both of which are frequently
peripherally located.
The prognosis is favorable in most cases.
 Elimination of exposure to the drug or other
toxin - resolution of symptoms, eosinophilia,
pulmonary infiltrates, and normalization of
lung function within a month.
Supplemental therapy with corticosteroids is
not universally required, but it may hasten
recovery in patients who are severely ill.
5. Idiopathic Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) has been


recognized as a distinct clinical entity.
More common in younger men, with a mean age
of approximately 30 years.
History of atopy is not essential.
Occurs in recently commenced smokers and who
have been involved in activities with unusual
exposures(such as cave exploration, plant
repotting, woodpile moving, and indoor
renovations).
It presents as an acute illness with fever,
myalgias, cough, dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain
with diffuse crackles & hypoxemia
Symptoms may lasts upto 30 days with avg. of 3
days persons with a history of chronic
myelogenous leukemia, hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation or HIV infection
Many cases have been reported in patients who
have recently commenced smoking, used flavored
tobacco products or had other changes in smoking
habits. The disease may recur when former
smokers resume smoking.
Moderate Leucocytosis is typical but blood
eosinophil count may be normal
Serum IgE elevated and BAL fluid will
contain eosinophils (25-50%).
Pulmonary function tests reveal a restrictive
ventilatory defect with a reduced DLCO.
Radiological findings

Diffuse bilateral alveolar and


interstitial infiltrates on chest X ray

Diffuse parenchymal ground-glass


Opacity inerlobular septal thicken
and/or consolidation and on CT
Small to moderate bilateral pleural effusions are
common.
Fluid analysis typically reveals a high pH and marked
eosinophilia.
Light microscopic examination of lung tissue reveals
prominent eosinophil infiltration in alveolar spaces,
bronchial walls, and, to a lesser degree, the
interstitium.
The pathological pattern of diffuse alveolar damage
with eosinophilic infiltrates should suggest the
possibility of AEP.
Role for Th2 lymphocytes and eosinophils in disease
pathogenesis. It remains unknown, however, whether
the eosinophils initiate the disease process or are a
Idiopathic AEP is a diagnosis of exclusion &
considered in patients with ALI or ARDS
without a typical antecedent illness.
The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) may
be elevated as well. Serum levels of thymus and
activation-regulated chemokine (TARC)/CCL17
(a ligand for CCR4 on Th2 lymphocytes) may be
elevated and may help to distinguish AEP from
other cause of acute lung injury(ALI).
Striking eosinophilia (25%–55%)is present in
BAL fluid
Idiopathic AEP generally carries an excellent
prognosis. Although fatalities have been
reported, most patients demonstrate rapid
dramatic responses to corticosteroid therapy.
Methylprednisolone 60 to 125 mg 6 th hourly in
respiratory failure.
Abatement of fever and respiratory symptoms
within 12 to 48 hours and complete resolution
of infiltrates, pleural effusion, and pulmonary
function impairment usually within 1 month
Thereafter, oral prednisone 40 -60 mg per day
for 2 -4weeks and tapered over weeks.
6.Chronic eosinophillic pneumonia

First described as a clinical entity by Carrington


and coworkers in 1969
Women > Men, usually Caucasians.
30 to 40 years of age
33-50% patients have history of atopy, allergic
rhinitis, or nasal polyps,urticaria.
Subacute presentation, with symptoms over
several months
symptoms

 low-grade fevers
 wheeze
 drenching night sweats
 Moderate weight loss
 Cough (dry mucoid)
 May develop dyspnea and lead to ARDS
Rarely ,patient may develop, arthralgias, skin
rash, pericarditis or unexplained heart failure
raising suspicion that there may be a
continuum bw CEP and EGPA.
Patients with CEP frequently manifest a moderate
leukocytosis.
The majority (66 to 95 percent) have peripheral blood
eosinophilia, with eosinophils constituting more than 6
percent of their leukocyte differential. ( till 90% eosinophils
have been documented)
A moderate normochromic, normocytic anemia and
thrombocytosis may be present.
The ESR is typically elevated (greater than 20mm/hour), and
IgE levels are elevated in up to one-half of cases.
Analysis of BAL fluid reveals increased eosinophils, typically
accounting for 40 percent or more of the white blood cell
(WBC) differential.
Blood and sputum cultures routinely fail to identify an
infectious etiology in these patients.
Carrington and colleagues described three
radiographic features that are
characteristic for CEP:
(1) peripherally based, progressive dense
infiltrates;
(2) rapid resolution of infiltrates following
corticosteroid treatment, with recurrences in
identical locations; and
(3) The appearance of infiltrates as the
“photographic negative of pulmonary edema.
Radiographic appearance of
chronic eosinophilic pneumonia
(CEP).

Variable computed tomography


appearance of infiltrates in two
patients with chronic eosinophilic
pneumonia.

Peripheral upper-lobe
predominant infiltrates may have
a
ground-glass appearance (A) or

may appear as regions of dense


consolidation or nodular opacity
(B).
Radiological findings
Infiltrates are bilateral, mid- to upper lung zones,
and may mimic loculated pleural fluid.
The areas of consolidation are patchy and dense
and can have ill-defined margins.
The characteristic “photographic negative of
pulmonary edema” appearance (which occurs in
less than 50 percent of cases) results if extensive
infiltrates surround major portions of or the
entire lung.
Common CT scan findings include ground-glass
opacities without clear consolidation.
Mediastinal lymphadenopathy may be present.
Pathogenesis

Th2 helper T cells likely have a role in disease


pathogenesis.
Eosinophils play a primary pathogenetic role in the
pulmonary tissue damage seen in this disorder.
Increased numbers of eosinophils appear in the
peripheral blood and bone marrow before the onset of
clinical disease, and eosinophilia is the predominant
abnormality in BAL fluid. These eosinophils appear to
be activated, since they show evidence of
degranulation on electron microscopy, eosinophil-
derived granule proteins (EDGPs) have been
identified microscopically within the pulmonary
parenchyma and microvasculature.
Treatment
Corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy for CEP.
Even patients presenting with severe respiratory
failure may respond well to steroid treatment.
Dramatic clinical, radiographic, and physiological
improvement occurs with steroid treatment.
In most cases, treatment with steroids leads to
defervescence within 6 hours, reduced dyspnea,
cough, and blood eosinophilia within 24 to 48 hours,
resolution of hypoxia in 2 to 3 days,
radiographic improvementwithin 1 to 2weeks,
complete resolution of symptoms within 2 to 3 weeks,
and
Normalization of the chest radiograph within 2 months.
Prednisone 0.5 mg/kg/d (40–60 mg a day)
continued until 2 weeks after resolution of
symptoms and radiographic abnormalities,
generally for 4 to 6 weeks. The dose of
prednisone can then be tapered slowly by 0.25
mg/kg/d and then continued for the subsequent 8
weeks.
 Treatment is usually maintained for at least 3
months and optimally for 6 to 9 months; during
this phase prednisone dosing can be decreased
by 5 mg every 4 weeks.
The prognosis of CEP is generally favorable.
 Patients may require 1 to 3 years of initial steroid
treatment to control the disease,1 and up to 50% may
require long-term maintenance treatment (2.5–10 mg
prednisone a day) to remain disease-free.
 Clinical, hematologic, or radiographic evidence of
relapses are common, occurring in 50% to 80% of cases
when steroids are tapered or discontinued.
 Relapses should be managed by increasing the prednisone
dose to ≥40 mg per day until 2 weeks after symptom
control has been achieved, with gradual taper thereafter.
 The anti–IL-5 monoclonal antibody omalizumab has also
been used successfully as a steroid-sparing agent in the
treatment of CEP.
THANK YO U

You might also like