Bionic Hand

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 57

Bionic Hand

Presenter Moderator
Dr Fathima Haneena P Dr S L Yadav
• Human hand: complex repertoire of sophisticated movements

• Somesthetic information about our environment (fine touch,


vibration, pain, temperature and proprioception)

• 25 degrees of freedom

• Loss of a hand can be devastating

• Now, replacement hand replicates normal hand functions and looks


Bio mechatronic hand

Artificial hand as a result of advancement in


prosthetic, electronic domain, for functional
substitution of the natural hand which replicate
sensory-motor capabilities of human hand and
provide natural appearance, controllability,
noiselessness, lightness and low energy
consumption
Design of Bionic hand
• Hand has been developed incorporating two fingers and thumb
• Perform two grasping tasks:
1. Cylindrical grasp
2. Tripod pinch grasp
INDEX/MIDDLE FINGER DESIGN

• They consist of three phalanxes and of palm housing, which is the part
of the palm needed to house the proximal actuator
THUMB DESIGN

• A thumb has been designed in order to complete the hand prototype


and to perform grasping tasks with thumb opposition
• The thumb has been designed by simply removing the distal phalanx
from the index/middle finger
• Thumb can be driven through
90
• The position of each joint is measured using Hall effect sensors

• Located on the links adjacent to the measured joint

• The hand prototype has been fabricated using the Fused Deposition
Modeling [FDM] process
The actuation system

• The finger actuator system is based on two micro-actuators


• Drive the MP and the PIP joints
• Both actuators are fully integrated in the hand structure(for cosmetic
reasons)
• First in the palm and the second within the proximal phalange
• Actuator motions are transmitted to the phalanges via tendons
Actuation mechanism
• Worm wheel
Advantage: self locking
Disadvantage: heavy

• DC motors
Provide multiple actuators into a
light weigh and adaptable device
Actuation mechanism
• The adoption of bulky and heavy actuators lead to an extreme
reduction of DOFs
• To achieve a stable grasp, high grip forces required
• From this viewpoint an artificial hand actuated by micro-drives
• Due to its enhanced mobility our hand will be able to increase the
contact areas between phalanxes and grasped object
Actuation mechanism
• The grasping task performed by the biomechatronic hand is divided in
two subsequent phases:
1) Reaching and shape-adapting phases
2) Grasping phase with thumb opposition
Motor control

• Myoelectric control : widely used method in bionic limbs

• Massive amount of electrical activity in the stump

• Eg: electrical activity in the flexor compartment of the forearm will


lead to flexing of the bionic hand
• To increase the accuracy of myoelectrically controlled prostheses

o Targeted motor reinnervation

o Bipolar differential electromyographic (EMG) electrodes within the


muscle to create a system capable of reading intramuscular EMG
signals

o Intraneural electrodes to carry a bidirectional flow of information


between the bionic limb and patient
Sensory feed back
• No longer perceived as part of the body
• Rejection
• Sensory feedback can be attained and provided by means of sensors
and actuators
Afferent pathway replaced by
1) invasively, by interfacing directly to neural structures
2) noninvasively, by providing feedback to intact sensory systems
normally not involved in the task
Sensory substitution
• Auditory sensory substitution :
• Having the grasp force by modulating the pitch, timbre or volume of
auditory signals

• Electrotactile substitution:
• Induced by a current that flows through the skin
• Vibrotactile substitution
• Mechanical vibration of the skin
• Typically at frequencies in the range of 10–500 Hz
• Class of haptic devices that can display pressure on body sites as a
representation of pressure sensed on the prosthesis
Mechanotactile Stimulation

• A force normal to the skin is applied by a pusher to convey sensory


information

• Modality-matched sensory feedback

• Force sensors in the fingers are used to detect the sensory input
• Pneumatic sensation:
• Phantom sensations are due to rearrangement of cortical circuits
occurring in the first hours after amputation

• Remapping of referred sensations D. Borsook,, V. S. Ramachandran,et al. “Acute plasticity in the human
somatosensory cortex following amputation,” Neuroreport

• Transferring the information from sensors in the fingers of a


prosthetic hand to specific locations on the skin, fingers of the
phantom hand can be stimulated IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION
ENGINEERING, 2013
Timing of feedback

• Latency between a variation of the output stimulus to a sensory input


variation should be as short as possible for an effective volitional use
of such information
Socket
• Typical inner socket materials include silicone, thermoplastic and
laminate
• Outer socket is primarily laminate
• For a standard prosthesis, a minimum expected layup would be:
• Inner socket: 2 layers of perlon stockinette, 2 layers of nyglass and 2
layers of perlon stockinette
• Outer socket: 4 layers of nyglass and 2 layers of perlon stockinette
Coverings
• Important part of the appearance and durability
• Made of Silicone
• Closely approximate the natural skin tones and
appendages of the wearer
• Ideal bionic hand:

Highly functional hand with low number of actuators that allow all
functions of hands including sensations
Types of Bionic Hands
I-LIMB Hand

• World's first commercially available


bionic hand
• Invented by David Gow and his team
• At the Bioengineering Centre of the
Princess Margaret Rose Hospital in Edinburgh
• Manufactured by Touch bionics
• Individually powered digits and thumb
• Has a choice of grips
• Controlled through the use of myoelectric signals
• Uses the muscle signals in the patient's residual arm to move the i-
LIMB Hand around
• Electrodes are placed at two pre-determined muscle sites
• Electrodes pick up the muscle signals when the patient contracts
his/her muscles
• These signals are then sent to a microprocessor which causes the
device to move
• The i-LIMB Hand has up to four different muscle triggers.
• The user is able to assign a grip to move the device to a certain
position.
These muscle triggers include:
• `hold open’; This option uses the open signal for a certain amount of
time.
• `double impulse’; This option uses two quick open signals once the
hand is opened completely.
• `triple impulse’ This option uses three quick open signals once the
hand is opened completely.
• `co-contraction’ This allows the device to contract the open and close
muscles at the same time
i-limb ultra
• Looks and moves like a natural hand
• Motorized digits allow the hand to bend at the joints of each digit
• Individual stall out technology gives the hand a compliant grip
• Hand accurately conforms around the shape of the object being
grasped
• Allows the user to increase the strength of their grip around an object
OTTO BOCK HAND
• Naturally-controlled movement
• Pick up signals via two sensors placed on his forearm, picking up
nerve stimuli very similar to those that trigger movement in organic
hands
• Three degrees of movement (rotation, bending/flexion, and
extension)
• Perform pinch and a full-hand grip
• Available now in the market
FINGERS: TOUCH BIONICS
• ProDigits are designed to replace individual fingers, not the entire
hand
• Custom-made to fit
• Triggered by myoelectric sensors which pick up and react to the
minute muscle movement in the hand and arm
• Perform pinch and grip
• Pick things up without crushing them
• Available ranging from around $57,000 to $73,000
• vari-grip mode allows variable digit-by-digit grip strength
• Mobile app control provides instant access to 14 programmable grip
patterns
• Allows flexibility and ability to customize the hand for a variety of
daily activities
• Powered thumb helps the user have access to 4 additional grip
patterns
• Auto-grasp feature to prevent objects from slipping
Bebionic hand
• Individual Motors in each finger allow to move the hand and grip in a
natural, coordinated way

• The motors are positioned to optimise weight distribution – making the


hand feel lighter and more comfortable

• Powerful microprocessors continuously monitor the position of each


finger, for precise, reliable control over hand movements

• 14 Selectable grip patterns and hand positions enable to perform a huge


number of everyday activities with ease
• Proportional Speed Control gives precision control over delicate tasks
• Four Wrist Options including Quick Disconnect, Multi- flex, Flexion
and Short wrist

• Bebalance software and wireless technology makes it easy to


customise the functions to suit patient’s preferences and lifestyle
• Selectable thumb positions and a built-in sensor enable to complete
more tasks than ever before

• Auto grip senses when a gripped item is slipping and adjusts the grip
to secure it

• Foldaway fingers provide natural looking movement, and flex when


brush past people or bump into objects

• Durable construction and advanced materials :strong enough to


handle up to 45kg
• Innovative palm design protects from impact damage, and makes the
hand quieter than ever

• Soft finger pads and a wide thumb profile maximises the surface area,
and enhances grip
Michelangelo hand
Michelangelo hand
• 6 degrees of freedom
• Similar shape of the human hand
• Water resistance
• Different forces and velocities to grab
• Composed of steel and duralumin high strength
• Externally is covered with silicone elastomer replacing the soft
structures
• Plastics replacing the muscles and tendons
ARM: A BRAIN-CONTROLLED LIMB FROM DARPA
• Mimics the natural motion of the arm, elbow, wrist, and hand with 27
different movements (including rotation, bending, and extension)
• Small chip implanted in the brain
• Sense and measure the firing of neurons
• Convey those commands to the arm, all near-instantaneously
• Developed by Dean Kamen
• Clinical trial not started
• If successful available in 4-5 years in market
Bionic hand- Advantages & Disadvantages
Advantages
• Individually motorized digits

• Thumb rotation: powered/manual

• Conformable grip

• vari-grip® feature to apply more force when desired

• Automated grips

• Multiple control options for accessing grips


• iLimb Hand allow individual digits to be removed for servicing

• User can maintain some functionality with the remainder of the limb
intact

• Small reductions in the weight of bionic hands make a big reduction in


the effort required to manipulate them

• Increased battery life and the efficient actuators deliver higher forces for
a given energy consumption

• Sensory feedback available


Disadvantages
• Sweat can cause damage and compromise the function of the
prosthesis
• Dirt or fluids coming in contact with the electrodes cause damage
• When socket tightly fit for better slip control, excessive bruising above
the elbow
• Limb positioning interfere with grip function causing inability to let go
or hold grip
• Lack of reliable precision grip and within-grip-activity change of grip
configuration
• Extensive training with occupational therapist required to achieve
successful function
• Servicing requires specialist input and often affected component need
to be sent back to the manufacturer
• Durability of the coverings requires diligent care and adds further
costs to the prosthesis
• Fitment to the soft tissue reduces the strength of the prosthesis
• Problems with battery function at colder ambient temperatures
ranging down to -15 deg C
• Noise generated during movement can be distressing to some users

You might also like